North Carolina State University
2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey:
All Respondents
(Report No. 3)

This report presents findings from the 2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey. It describes the overall responses to each survey question within the following topics: student goals and intentions; academic environment and faculty contributions; evaluation of student services; knowledge, skills and personal development; and employment. For a full discussion of the survey�s methodology, see "2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile." Responses broken down by gender, race/ethnicity, semester of graduation, and college are available on the web.

Table of Contents:
  Student Goals and Intentions:   Knowledge, Skills and Personal Development:
 
  • Educational Goals
  •  
  • General Growth and Training
  •  
  • Post-Graduate Plans
  •  
  • Knowledge, Skills, and Personal Development
  •        
      Academic Environment   Employment
     
  • Satisfaction with Education
  •  
  • Number of Hours Worked
  •  
  • Evaluation of Education
  •  
  • Job Relationship to Major
  •  
  • Faculty Contributions
  •  
  • Co-op Experience
  •        
      Services for Students:    
     
  • Academic Advising
  •    
     
  • Research Support
  •    
     
  • Technology Services
  •    
     
  • Career-related Services
  •    
     
  • Off-campus Degree Program
  •    

    Student Goals and Intentions

    Educational Goals (Table 3-1)

    Students were asked questions regarding their primary goal or objective in attending NCSU and to what degree that goal or objective was accomplished. Table 3-1 shows goals/objectives and accomplishment. The majority of respondents' primary goal in attending NC State was either to prepare for a career (46.3%) or for graduate or professional school (31.2%). Almost three-fourths (74.5%) of all respondents said they "fully accomplished" their goal.

    Respondents who said their primary goal was to earn a bachelor's degree or certificate were most likely to fully accomplish that objective (86.5%). Around three-fourths of the seniors whose goal was to improve for current career (75.0%) or to prepare for a new career (73.4%) said they "fully accomplished" their goal. Slightly fewer of those whose goal was to prepare for graduate or professional school said they "fully accomplished" their goal (70.0%).

    Table 3-1: Goals and Objectives at NC State

    Primary goal/objective

    Accomplishment of goal/objective

    % saying

    Total

    %

    Fully accomplished

    Partially accomplished

    Not accomplished

    Prep for new career

    73.4%

    25.8%

    0.9%

    46.3%

    Prep for grad/prof. school

    70.0%

    29.7%

    0.3%

    31.2%

    Bach. deg./certificate only

    86.5%

    13.2%

    0.3%

    18.2%

    Other

    68.1%

    27.7%

    4.3%

    2.3%

    Improve for current career

    75.0%

    25.0%

    0.0%

    1.6%

    Courses for personal interest

    50.0%

    37.5%

    12.5%

    0.4%

    Total %

    74.5%

    24.8%

    0.7%

    100.0%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Post-Graduation Plans (Table 3-2)

    At the time they completed the survey, about one-fifth of respondents said they had either already accepted a job for after graduation (16.6%) or would continue in their current position (3.2%). About 40 percent (39.1%) were still seeking employment. Slightly more than one-fifth said they plan to go on to graduate or professional school, either full-time (17.7%) or part-time (3.5%).

    Table 3-2: Plans Following Graduation

    Plans following graduation

    n

    % saying Yes

    Still seeking employment

    788

    39.1%

    Graduate/prof. school full-time

    356

    17.7%

    Accepted a job

    334

    16.6%

    Don't know yet

    173

    8.6%

    Other

    116

    5.8%

    G/P school part-time & work part-time

    70

    3.5%

    Continuing in current position

    64

    3.2%

    Not seeking empl./not planning school

    56

    2.8%

    Entering military service

    35

    1.7%

    Take more undergraduate courses

    23

    1.1%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Academic Environment

    Satisfaction with Education (Table 3-3)

    The majority of students appeared to be satisfied with their education at NC State. Almost three-fourths (73.8%) said they would choose NC State again if they could start over. Two-thirds (66.9%) said they would choose the same major again. Less than 10 percent said they would not choose NC State again (8.8%), and 14.4 percent would not choose the same major again.

    Table 3-3: Satisfaction with Education

    % saying

    Yes

    No

    Not Sure

    Choose NC State again?

    73.8%

    8.8%

    17.4%

    Choose same major again?

    66.9%

    14.4%

    18.7%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Evaluation of Education (Tables 3-4 and 3-5)

    Students were asked to give their opinions of the academic environment at NC State. Specifically, they rated the overall education they received, instruction in their major and overall, and the intellectual environment on campus.

    Most respondents (91.0%) gave positive ratings to the overall education they had received at NC State. The majority of students were also happy with the quality of instruction they had received, although ratings were much higher for instruction within their major than overall. Almost 45 percent of respondents (44.7%) said instruction in their major was "excellent" and another 44.5% said it was "good." In comparison, only 13.2% rated their overall instruction as "excellent," while 67.4 percent said it was "good." Finally, over two-thirds of respondents (67.2%) agreed that the intellectual environment on campus was "strong" (54.0%) or "very strong" (13.2%).

    Table 3-4: Evaluation of Education

    Mean

    % saying

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Overall education at NC State

    3.24

    34.0%

    57.0%

    8.3%

    0.7%

    Quality of instruction in major

    3.33

    44.7%

    44.5%

    9.7%

    1.1%

    Quality of instruction overall

    2.93

    13.2%

    67.4%

    18.5%

    0.9%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Table 3-5: Campus Environment

    Mean

    Very strong

    Strong

    Average

    Weak

    Very weak

    Intellectual environment on campus

    3.76

    13.2%

    54.0%

    29.3%

    2.9%

    0.7%

    Comparisons and Frequencies: Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Faculty Contributions

    Data not available. Click here for more information.

    Services for Students

    Survey respondents were instructed to evaluate various academic services provided by NC State, based on their experiences within the last two years on campus. Ratings ranged from 1 ("poor") to 4 ("excellent"). The "don't know/did not use" option available for those students with insufficient experience to evaluate a service area was excluded from analyses. Students participating in an off-campus degree program were asked about their likelihood of obtaining a degree on a UNC campus had this service not been available.

    Academic Services (Table 3-6)

    Four primary areas of academic services were assessed: academic advising, research support, technology services, and career-related services. Among overall ratings of each service area, highest mean ratings were given to technology services (3.21) and career-related services (3.18). The three highest ranking individual items were within the technology services area: access to the Internet (3.65), hours of operation for computer labs and help desks (3.30), and access to up-to-date facilities (3.30).

    Academic Advising: Between two-thirds and three-fourths of respondents gave positive ratings to each of the various aspects of academic advising in their major. About 40 percent rated access to advisor (41.0%) and accurate information about degree requirements and course sequencing (40.2%) as "excellent." Students were less satisfied with the amount of time they had with their advisor: over ten percent (11.3%) rated this aspect of advising as "poor."

    Research Support: Research support items received relatively lower ratings when compared with those in other areas. Each of the three items received mean ratings below 3.0, with less than 30 percent of respondents rating each of them as "excellent."

    Technology Services: Seventy percent of respondents rated access to the Internet as "excellent," and about 45 percent rated hours of operation for computer labs and help desks (45.6%) and access to up-to-date facilities (44.7%) as "excellent." However, access to trained staff for help (mean rating of 2.69) and technology training classes (2.78) had the lowest average ratings of all academic service items.

    Career-related Services: Highest average ratings for career-related services were for information available through Internet and other technology (3.28) and opportunity for career assistance (3.22). All career-related services items received mean ratings above 3.0, making this area the most consistently high-rated academic service area.

    Table 3-6: Academic Services Areas

    Mean Response

    % saying

    4: Excellent

    3: Good

    2: Fair

    1: Poor

    Academic Advising (in major)

    Access to advisor

    3.09

    41.0%

    35.1%

    16.2%

    7.8%

    Accurate info. on requirements/course sequencing

    3.06

    40.2%

    32.8%

    19.5%

    7.6%

    Knowledge of policies/procedures

    3.03

    35.0%

    40.1%

    18.4%

    6.6%

    Sufficient time with advisor

    2.96

    36.9%

    33.1%

    18.8%

    11.3%

    Academic advising overall

    3.00

    35.5%

    36.6%

    20.3%

    7.6%

    Research Support

    Access to faculty involved in research

    2.90

    27.1%

    43.6%

    21.5%

    7.7%

    Access to up-to-date facilities

    2.90

    27.7%

    42.9%

    20.7%

    8.7%

    Research support overall

    2.91

    22.4%

    51.0%

    22.3%

    4.3%

    Technology Services

    Access to the Internet

    3.65

    70.3%

    25.3%

    3.4%

    1.0%

    Hours of operation for computer labs & help desks

    3.30

    45.6%

    41.2%

    10.8%

    2.4%

    Access to up-to-date facilities

    3.30

    44.7%

    43.2%

    10.0%

    2.1%

    Access to trained staff for help

    2.69

    19.3%

    40.0%

    31.0%

    9.7%

    Technology training classes

    2.78

    20.9%

    44.0%

    27.5%

    7.6%

    Technology services overall

    3.21

    33.8%

    54.5%

    10.3%

    1.4%

    Career-related Services

    Information available through Internet and other technology

    3.28

    42.0%

    45.7%

    10.3%

    2.0%

    Opportunity for career assistance

    3.22

    39.5%

    46.1%

    11.8%

    2.6%

    Information on internships, co-op, and other career-related experiences

    3.15

    39.0%

    42.0%

    14.4%

    4.6%

    Resources available to explore career options

    3.14

    36.1%

    45.6%

    14.4%

    3.9%

    Career-related services overall

    3.18

    35.1%

    49.9%

    12.7%

    2.2%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Off-campus Degree Program (Table 3-7)

    Respondents participating in an off-campus degree program (n = 67) were asked how likely it is that they would have obtained their degree on a UNC campus had the off-campus program not been available. Over half indicated that they "probably" would have (38.8%) or that it was "very likely" (17.9%). Over one-fourth said it was "not likely" (28.4%).

    Table 3-7: Likelihood of Obtaining Degree at a UNC Campus (among off-campus degree program students)

    n

    %

    4: Very likely

    12

    17.9%

    3: Probably

    26

    38.8%

    2: Probably not

    10

    14.9%

    1: Not likely

    19

    28.4%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Knowledge, Skills, and Personal Development

    General Growth and Training (Table 3-8)

    A majority of respondents (53.8%) said NC State met their intellectual growth needs "very well." Respondents were slightly less positive about NC State's contribution to their personal growth (45.4% said their needs were met "very well") and much less positive about the contribution to their career training (33.4%). More than one-fifth said NC State contributed only "somewhat adequately" (17.3%) or "poorly" (5.1%) to their career training needs.

    Table 3-8: NC State's Contribution to Needs

    Mean Rating

    % saying

    4: Very Well

    3: Adequately

    2: Somewhat adequately

    1: Poorly

    Intellectual growth needs

    3.44

    53.8%

    38.2%

    6.7%

    1.3%

    Personal growth needs

    3.27

    45.4%

    39.5%

    11.7%

    3.4%

    Career training needs

    3.06

    33.4%

    44.2%

    17.3%

    5.1%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Knowledge, Skills, and Personal Development (Table 3-9)

    Graduating seniors rated the extent to which NC State contributed to 35 factors related to their general education, personal development, and world views, using a scale of 1 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). The majority of respondents said NC State contributed at least "somewhat" to all factors listed. In general, higher mean ratings were given to NC State's contribution to general education and personal development goals compared with world view goals.

    On average, highest ratings were given to enhancing analytic skills (3.62), ability to critically analyze ideas and information (3.59), ability to plan and carry out projects independently (3.59), realizing potential for success (3.57), and ability to function as part of a team (3.56). Lowest ratings were given to advancing appreciation of the arts (2.76), exercising public responsibility and community service (2.89), commitment to personal health and fitness (3.00), appreciating racial equity (3.04), appreciating gender equity (3.06), understanding the present as it relates to history (3.10), and understanding issues and problems facing the world (3.10).

    Table 3-9: Contribution to Knowledge, Skills, and Personal Development

    Mean Rating

    % saying

    4: Very Much

    3: Somewhat

    2: Very Little

    1: Not at all

    General Education

    Enhancing analytic skills

    3.62

    66.5%

    29.6%

    3.2%

    0.8%

    Ability to critically analyze ideas/info.

    3.59

    65.1%

    30.3%

    3.4%

    1.2%

    Ability to plan/carry out projects independently

    3.59

    65.7%

    29.4%

    3.4%

    1.5%

    Developing computer skills

    3.55

    65.3%

    26.2%

    6.6%

    1.8%

    Understanding influence of science/technology

    3.50

    58.8%

    33.7%

    5.9%

    1.6%

    Comprehension skills

    3.47

    56.1%

    35.9%

    6.7%

    1.3%

    Applying scientific methods

    3.43

    56.0%

    32.9%

    9.4%

    1.7%

    Speaking skills

    3.40

    51.8%

    37.7%

    9.0%

    1.5%

    Using math skills

    3.38

    52.1%

    35.3%

    10.7%

    1.9%

    Writing skills

    3.37

    47.8%

    42.3%

    8.5%

    1.4%

    Listening skills

    3.37

    48.0%

    42.4%

    8.1%

    1.6%

    Understanding diverse cultures and values

    3.22

    43.5%

    38.9%

    13.6%

    4.0%

    Personal Growth

    Potential for success

    3.57

    65.3%

    28.3%

    4.7%

    1.6%

    Ability to function as part of a team

    3.56

    63.7%

    29.9%

    4.6%

    1.8%

    Valuing learning as a lifelong process

    3.54

    63.6%

    28.9%

    5.7%

    1.9%

    Independence and self-reliance

    3.54

    64.3%

    27.8%

    5.1%

    2.9%

    Personal growth

    3.54

    62.8%

    30.1%

    5.1%

    2.0%

    Self-discipline

    3.49

    60.2%

    31.6%

    5.5%

    2.7%

    Time management

    3.45

    58.0%

    31.7%

    7.5%

    2.8%

    Coping with change

    3.43

    56.7%

    32.3%

    8.1%

    2.9%

    Taking responsibility for own behavior

    3.42

    58.7%

    28.5%

    8.5%

    4.3%

    Ability to lead or guide others

    3.40

    51.8%

    38.8%

    7.0%

    2.4%

    Self-confidence

    3.37

    52.7%

    35.3%

    8.1%

    3.9%

    Ability to handle stress

    3.35

    52.6%

    33.4%

    10.0%

    4.0%

    Sense of personal identity

    3.34

    52.9%

    32.4%

    10.4%

    4.4%

    Recognizing/acting upon ethical principles

    3.20

    41.9%

    40.2%

    13.3%

    4.5%

    Commitment to personal health/fitness

    3.00

    32.6%

    40.3%

    21.2%

    5.8%

    Exercising public responsibility/comm. service

    2.89

    25.4%

    45.1%

    22.8%

    6.7%

    World Views

    Ability to work with people from diverse backgrounds

    3.42

    54.6%

    36.0%

    6.7%

    2.7%

    Developing a tolerance for divergent views

    3.33

    48.4%

    39.1%

    9.5%

    3.0%

    Understanding issues/problems facing the world

    3.10

    35.4%

    43.4%

    16.9%

    4.3%

    Understanding present as it relates to history

    3.10

    34.5%

    45.0%

    16.7%

    3.8%

    Appreciating gender equity

    3.06

    35.9%

    40.7%

    16.6%

    6.8%

    Appreciating racial equity

    3.04

    35.0%

    40.5%

    17.7%

    6.8%

    Advancing appreciation of the arts

    2.76

    25.5%

    36.5%

    26.3%

    11.7%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Employment

    Number of Hours Worked (Table 3-10)

    About 80 percent of respondents (80.4%) indicated they were employed during their graduation year. Of those respondents who worked, 40.1 percent worked an average of 20 or more hours per week during their last year at NC State.

    Table 3-10: Number of Hours Worked (among employed respondents, n=1632)

    n

    % saying yes

    Less than 5 hrs/wk

    129

    7.9%

    5-9 hrs/wk

    194

    11.9%

    10-14 hrs/wk

    339

    20.8%

    15-19 hrs/wk

    314

    19.2%

    20-24 hrs/wk

    321

    19.7%

    25-29 hrs/wk

    146

    8.9%

    30-34 hrs/wk

    74

    4.5%

    35 or more hrs/wk

    115

    7.0%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Job Relationship to Major (Table 3-11)

    More than one-third (36.5%) of respondents who worked during graduation year were working in jobs directly related to their academic major. The majority of those working in areas unrelated to their major said they were doing so by choice (67.9%).

    Table 3-11: Job Relationship to Academic Major

    % saying

    Directly Related

    Somewhat Related

    Not Related

    Job related to academic major?

    36.5%

    31.7%

    31.8%

    Yes

    No

    If "Not Related" was this by choice?

    67.9%

    32.1%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top

    Co-op Experience (Table 3-12)

    Over half of all respondents (52.9%) had a co-op, internship, practicum, or field experience while at NC State. Of these respondents, over half (56.9%) said the experience made an "excellent" contribution to their personal or professional growth. Almost half (44.1%) of those with such experience said they received a job offer from their employer.

    Table 3-12: Co-op Experience

    % saying

    Yes

    Job contribution to

    personal/professional growth

    % saying

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Co-op, internship, practicum, etc.?

    52.9%

    56.9%

    33.6%

    8.3%

    1.3%

    Yes

    No

    Received job offer from co-op, etc.?

    44.1%

    55.9%

    Comparisons and Frequencies:
    Gender/Ethnicity, College
    Back to Top


    For more information on the 2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
    Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
    Office of Institutional Planning and Research
    Box 7002
    NCSU
    Phone: (919) 515-4184
    Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

    Posted: October, 2001

    Download a Microsoft Word Version (Word 6.0 or higher) of this report.
    We've named the file .bin so your browser gives you a download window instead of displaying the file. When you download it you can rename it to .doc to indicate that it's a Word file.

    Return to 2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

    Return to OIRP Survey Page

    Return to OIRP Home Page