2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey Data Tables:
College Comparisons
in Services for Students

This document reports survey data on college/school differences in respondents´┐Ż ratings of student services. Survey results for all respondents are provided in "
2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods, see " 2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile."

Services For Students: Academic Advising (In Major) | Research Support | Technology Services | Career-related Services
Off Campus Degree Program


Academic Advising (In Major)

Q Access to advisor
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.09 3.40 2.76 2.96 3.08 3.18 3.19 3.44 3.31 2.66
    7.8 4.1 10.9 9.8 6.1 4.0 7.6 2.5 3.8 17.8
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 16.2 9.2 26.1 21.6 17.7 17.6 11.6 7.6 3.8 23.3
3: Good % 35.1 29.2 39.1 31.4 38.1 34.4 35.1 32.9 50.0 33.8
4: Excellent % 41.0 57.6 23.9 37.3 38.0 44.0 45.8 57.0 42.3 25.1
Back to Top


 

Q Sufficient Time with Advisor
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 2.96 3.28 2.67 2.87 2.89 3.22 3.08 3.34 3.18 2.46
    11.3 7.8 10.9 12.6 10.1 4.0 8.8 5.1 3.9 25.5
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 18.8 10.9 32.6 21.9 22.5 16.0 16.1 8.9 13.7 22.5
3: Good % 33.1 26.5 34.8 31.8 35.3 33.6 33.7 32.9 43.1 32.7
4: Excellent % 36.9 54.8 21.7 33.8 32.1 46.4 41.4 53.2 39.2 19.3
Back to Top


 

Q Accurately Informed On Degree Requirements/Course Sequencing
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.06 3.16 2.51 2.87 3.16 3.22 2.99 3.19 3.19 2.86
    7.6 6.5 14.9 10.6 6.4 4.8 9.7 5.0 5.7 8.6
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 19.5 17.3 29.8 27.2 14.8 14.4 22.2 16.3 13.2 27.3
3: Good % 32.8 30.3 44.7 27.2 34.9 34.4 27.4 33.8 37.7 34.0
4: Excellent % 40.2 45.9 10.6 35.1 43.9 46.4 40.7 45.0 43.4 30.1
Back to Top


 

Q Knowledge of Campus Policies/Procedures
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.03 3.13 2.48 2.91 3.14 3.15 2.95 3.07 3.04 2.89
    6.6 4.5 13.6 12.2 4.9 6.5 8.3 2.7 5.8 8.1
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 18.4 17.2 31.8 20.9 14.5 11.3 24.9 21.3 23.1 20.2
3: Good % 40.1 39.0 47.7 30.4 42.4 43.5 30.7 42.7 32.7 46.6
4: Excellent % 35.0 39.3 6.8 36.5 38.2 38.7 36.1 33.3 38.5 25.1
Back to Top


 

Q Academic Advising Overall
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.00 3.23 2.64 2.84 3.00 3.21 3.04 3.25 3.25 2.71
    7.6 4.8 10.6 11.3 6.7 6.4 6.8 6.3 1.9 12.3
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 20.3 14.7 29.8 27.2 21.6 9.6 19.9 10.0 9.4 26.8
3: Good % 36.6 32.9 44.7 27.8 37.1 40.8 35.9 36.3 50.9 38.8
4: Excellent % 35.5 47.6 14.9 33.8 34.6 43.2 37.5 47.5 37.7 22.2
Back to Top


Research Support

Q Access to Faculty Involved in Research
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 2.90 3.05 2.38 3.17 2.70 3.17 2.80 3.00 3.17 2.92
    7.7 1.5 9.5 5.1 13.8 2.9 10.1 . 4.8 7.4
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 21.5 23.1 47.6 11.2 24.6 17.1 19.4 22.4 16.7 20.4
3: Good % 43.6 44.2 38.1 44.9 39.5 40.0 51.2 55.2 35.7 45.1
4: Excellent % 27.1 31.2 4.8 38.8 22.1 40.0 19.4 22.4 42.9 27.2
Back to Top


 

Q Access to Up-to-date Facilities
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 2.90 2.89 3.19 3.24 2.53 2.98 2.94 3.05 3.38 3.19
    8.7 3.9 2.8 3.4 18.1 9.7 7.2 1.6 2.1 2.7
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 20.7 25.8 13.9 12.6 28.1 18.3 16.0 23.8 14.6 11.8
3: Good % 42.9 48.0 44.4 41.2 36.6 36.6 52.5 42.9 27.1 48.9
4: Excellent % 27.7 22.3 38.9 42.9 17.3 35.5 24.3 31.7 56.3 36.6
Back to Top


 

Q Research Support Overall
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 2.91 2.97 2.88 3.15 2.63 3.02 2.93 3.00 3.28 3.11
    4.3 1.3 2.9 1.7 9.3 4.6 3.4 . 2.2 1.6
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 22.3 22.9 20.6 12.8 32.2 17.2 20.1 23.8 13.0 13.7
3: Good % 51.0 52.9 61.8 53.8 44.2 49.4 56.3 52.4 39.1 57.0
4: Excellent % 22.4 22.9 14.7 31.6 14.3 28.7 20.1 23.8 45.7 27.7
Back to Top


Technology Services

Q Access to the Internet
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.65 3.67 3.73 3.73 3.66 3.48 3.65 3.72 3.73 3.60
    1.0 1.0 . 0.7 1.3 4.0 0.4 . . 0.3
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 3.4 2.1 2.2 2.7 3.5 4.8 2.4 2.5 1.9 5.3
3: Good % 25.3 25.8 22.2 19.5 22.8 30.6 28.5 22.8 23.1 28.8
4: Excellent % 70.3 71.1 75.6 77.2 72.5 60.5 68.7 74.7 75.0 65.6
Back to Top


 

Q Hours of Operation for Computer Labs & Help Desks
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.30 3.30 3.20 3.51 3.37 2.94 3.27 3.46 3.42 3.20
    2.4 3.2 2.2 . 1.9 8.1 2.9 1.3 . 1.9
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 10.8 9.2 15.6 6.2 8.7 21.0 11.4 6.3 7.7 14.4
3: Good % 41.2 41.8 42.2 36.3 39.7 40.3 42.0 38.0 42.3 45.5
4: Excellent % 45.6 45.7 40.0 57.5 49.7 30.6 43.7 54.4 50.0 38.3
Back to Top


 

Q Access to Up-to-date Facilities
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.30 3.36 3.13 3.47 3.19 3.11 3.33 3.39 3.50 3.41
    2.1 1.4 6.7 1.3 3.3 4.1 1.3 2.6 . 0.5
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 10.0 7.4 15.6 4.7 14.4 13.8 6.7 3.9 3.8 8.9
3: Good % 43.2 44.9 35.6 39.6 41.9 48.8 50.0 45.5 42.3 39.8
4: Excellent % 44.7 46.3 42.2 54.4 40.3 33.3 42.0 48.1 53.8 50.7
Back to Top


 

Q Access to Trained Staff for Help
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 2.69 2.71 2.56 2.99 2.52 2.47 2.82 2.52 2.84 2.85
    9.7 10.5 11.1 3.5 14.6 15.7 5.9 7.8 8.0 4.8
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 31.0 29.1 37.8 19.1 35.0 36.5 27.0 43.8 26.0 28.7
3: Good % 40.0 39.5 35.6 51.8 34.7 33.0 46.4 37.5 40.0 43.4
4: Excellent % 19.3 20.9 15.6 25.5 15.8 14.8 20.7 10.9 26.0 23.1
Back to Top


 

Q Technology Training Classes
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 2.78 2.89 2.12 3.05 2.61 2.55 2.83 2.69 3.03 3.01
    7.6 4.2 32.0 2.3 11.2 12.0 5.9 6.1 5.4 3.3
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 27.5 24.7 28.0 19.3 32.6 32.6 28.7 32.7 21.6 20.9
3: Good % 44.0 49.4 36.0 50.0 40.0 43.5 41.9 46.9 37.8 47.6
4: Excellent % 20.9 21.7 4.0 28.4 16.2 12.0 23.5 14.3 35.1 28.2
Back to Top


 

Q Technology Services Overall
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.21 3.23 2.98 3.38 3.15 2.97 3.25 3.25 3.31 3.27
    1.4 1.4 4.4 0.7 1.7 4.0 0.8 . 1.9 0.5
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 10.3 8.7 22.2 6.8 12.4 14.5 8.3 5.1 5.8 9.2
3: Good % 54.5 55.2 44.4 46.6 54.6 62.1 56.3 64.6 51.9 52.4
4: Excellent % 33.8 34.6 28.9 45.9 31.2 19.4 34.6 30.4 40.4 37.8
Back to Top


Career-related Services

Q Opportunity for Career Assistance
Career: Opp. for career assistance NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.22 3.36 2.53 2.86 3.37 3.16 3.07 2.86 3.70 3.17
    2.6 1.1 11.1 6.7 0.9 3.7 3.8 10.2 . 2.5
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 11.8 7.5 38.9 22.9 7.2 11.9 13.6 18.6 4.0 15.0
3: Good % 46.1 45.3 36.1 48.6 45.8 49.5 54.3 45.8 22.0 45.5
4: Excellent % 39.5 46.0 13.9 21.9 46.0 34.9 28.3 25.4 74.0 37.0
Back to Top


 

Q Information on Internships, Co-ops, and Other Career-Related Experiences
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.15 3.34 2.47 2.77 3.26 3.35 2.96 2.74 3.67 3.06
    4.6 2.2 15.8 13.6 2.5 1.7 7.3 9.8 . 5.2
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 14.4 9.9 34.2 20.9 11.8 10.1 15.2 31.1 4.1 18.1
3: Good % 42.0 40.1 36.8 40.0 42.9 39.5 51.3 34.4 24.5 42.7
4: Excellent % 39.0 47.8 13.2 25.5 42.9 48.7 26.2 24.6 71.4 34.0
Back to Top


 

Q Resources Available to Explore Career Options
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.14 3.25 2.43 2.77 3.25 3.15 3.04 2.67 3.54 3.15
    3.9 2.6 16.2 13.5 2.2 3.7 3.2 11.5 2.0 2.5
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 14.4 11.2 35.1 22.5 11.8 13.8 16.3 24.6 4.0 15.1
3: Good % 45.6 44.8 37.8 37.8 44.5 46.8 54.2 49.2 32.0 47.7
4: Excellent % 36.1 41.4 10.8 26.1 41.5 35.8 26.3 14.8 62.0 34.8
Back to Top


 

Q Information Available Through Internet and Other Technology
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.28 3.40 2.71 3.06 3.36 3.21 3.14 2.98 3.50 3.30
    2.0 1.1 14.3 7.1 1.2 0.9 2.0 3.2 . 1.2
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 10.3 7.3 20.0 14.3 7.5 12.5 13.6 19.0 10.4 10.8
3: Good % 45.7 42.2 45.7 43.8 45.3 50.9 53.0 54.0 29.2 44.7
4: Excellent % 42.0 49.5 20.0 34.8 46.0 35.7 31.3 23.8 60.4 43.2
Back to Top


 

Q Career-Related Services Overall
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM
  Mean 3.18 3.30 2.46 2.86 3.29 3.21 3.06 2.87 3.63 3.15
    2.2 1.1 14.6 7.6 1.1 2.5 2.9 4.8 . 1.2
1: Poor %
2: Fair % 12.7 8.2 34.1 22.7 9.0 9.3 15.7 25.8 3.9 15.0
3: Good % 49.9 50.7 41.5 46.2 50.3 52.5 53.9 46.8 29.4 51.3
4: Excellent % 35.1 40.0 9.8 23.5 39.7 35.6 27.5 22.6 66.7 32.4
Back to Top


Off Campus Degree Program

Q Likelihood of Obtaining Degree at a UNC Campus (among off-campus degree program students)
NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS COT COM
    28.4 33.3 . 14.3 29.6 75.0 37.5 . 18.2
1: Not likely %
2: Probably not % 14.9 16.7 . . 11.1 . 37.5 . 27.3
3: Probably % 38.8 50.0 100.0 71.4 40.7 . 12.5 100.0 18.2
4: Very likely % 17.9 . . 14.3 18.5 25.0 12.5 . 36.4
Back to Top


For more information on the 2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: October, 2001


Download an Excel version of this report.

Return to 2000-2001 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page