NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

Tables of Results
by Academic Profile


The following tables provide results to questions in Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure, broken down by administrative experience, rank, and tenure status. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between groups (e.g., between tenure-track and non-tenure-track) are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section H by College | Section H by Demographic Profile


H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 31.7 45.8 16.8 5.8 1026

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 24.8 50.0 18.0 7.3 206
..... Assoc Prof 3.0 30.0 44.7 18.7 6.6 273
..... Full Prof 3.2 37.9 45.3 14.0 2.8 435
..... Lecturer 2.8 24.1 42.9 20.5 12.5 112

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 22.6 47.0 19.5 11.0 164
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 24.6 49.7 18.7 7.0 171
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 35.6 44.6 15.6 4.2 691

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 28.7 46.4 18.3 6.6 755
..... Yes (%) 3.2 39.9 44.3 12.5 3.3 271
Back to top


H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 35.4 49.5 11.4 3.7 1027

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.0 24.8 55.3 15.5 4.4 206
..... Assoc Prof 3.1 32.4 51.5 11.0 5.1 272
..... Full Prof 3.3 44.7 46.8 6.9 1.6 434
..... Lecturer 2.9 27.0 44.3 21.7 7.0 115

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 24.6 47.9 20.4 7.2 167
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 25.9 55.9 15.3 2.9 170
..... TT: Tenured 3.3 40.4 48.3 8.3 3.0 690

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.1 31.8 51.3 12.9 4.0 757
..... Yes (%) 3.3 45.6 44.4 7.0 3.0 270
Back to top


H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 34.9 55.3 6.9 2.8 880

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.2 29.7 62.5 4.2 3.6 192
..... Assoc Prof 3.2 32.1 55.2 9.9 2.8 252
..... Full Prof 3.3 38.7 53.4 5.8 2.1 382
..... Lecturer 3.2 38.9 44.4 11.1 5.6 54

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.1 31.5 53.9 10.1 4.5 89
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.2 32.1 60.7 3.6 3.6 168
..... TT: Tenured 3.2 36.1 54.1 7.4 2.4 623

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.2 33.7 55.5 7.7 3.1 652
..... Yes (%) 3.3 38.2 54.8 4.8 2.2 228
Back to top


H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 38.1 53.4 5.9 2.6 812

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.2 31.0 60.2 5.8 2.9 171
..... Assoc Prof 3.2 35.1 52.2 9.6 3.1 228
..... Full Prof 3.4 42.9 51.9 3.8 1.4 366
..... Lecturer 3.2 40.4 46.8 4.3 8.5 47

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.1 34.2 51.3 7.9 6.6 76
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.2 32.2 61.2 3.9 2.6 152
..... TT: Tenured 3.3 40.1 51.7 6.2 2.1 584

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.2 36.5 54.7 6.0 2.8 600
..... Yes (%) 3.3 42.5 50.0 5.7 1.9 212
Back to top


H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 33.3 47.8 12.3 6.6 805

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 31.2 50.9 13.3 4.6 173
..... Assoc Prof 3.0 31.6 44.4 15.0 9.0 234
..... Full Prof 3.1 34.3 49.9 11.5 4.3 347
..... Lecturer 3.0 41.2 39.2 2.0 17.6 51

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.1 39.5 43.2 3.7 13.6 81
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.1 32.0 49.7 15.0 3.3 153
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 32.7 48.0 12.8 6.5 571

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.1 32.8 47.3 13.7 6.2 598
..... Yes (%) 3.1 34.8 49.3 8.2 7.7 207
Back to top


H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 23.0 47.3 22.1 7.6 934

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 22.5 52.9 18.8 5.8 191
..... Assoc Prof 2.8 25.2 43.6 20.8 10.4 250
..... Full Prof 2.9 21.4 47.4 26.0 5.2 388
..... Lecturer 2.8 24.8 45.7 16.2 13.3 105

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 24.2 49.0 14.8 12.1 149
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 23.4 50.0 21.5 5.1 158
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 22.6 46.3 23.9 7.2 627

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 23.3 46.1 22.8 7.8 690
..... Yes (%) 2.9 22.1 50.8 20.1 7.0 244
Back to top


H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 29.1 51.1 12.5 7.4 938

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 27.1 56.8 10.9 5.2 192
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 26.7 48.2 14.7 10.4 251
..... Full Prof 3.1 32.1 51.5 11.5 4.9 390
..... Lecturer 2.9 27.6 45.7 13.3 13.3 105

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 26.2 48.3 12.8 12.8 149
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.1 28.5 56.3 12.0 3.2 158
..... TT: Tenured 3.0 30.0 50.4 12.5 7.1 631

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 28.3 50.4 13.7 7.6 695
..... Yes (%) 3.1 31.3 53.1 9.1 6.6 243
Back to top


H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 18.0 37.5 32.7 11.8 931

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.6 17.6 35.1 36.7 10.6 188
..... Assoc Prof 2.5 17.5 33.9 33.5 15.1 251
..... Full Prof 2.7 18.5 44.2 29.8 7.5 389
..... Lecturer 2.4 18.4 25.2 34.0 22.3 103

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.5 18.6 28.3 33.1 20.0 145
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.6 17.2 33.8 38.9 10.2 157
..... TT: Tenured 2.7 18.1 40.5 31.0 10.3 629

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.6 17.7 35.9 33.2 13.2 690
..... Yes (%) 2.7 19.1 41.9 31.1 7.9 241
Back to top


H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 21.8 47.4 17.9 12.9 909

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 25.5 50.5 16.3 7.6 184
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 21.7 45.8 16.3 16.3 240
..... Full Prof 2.9 21.4 51.8 18.0 8.9 384
..... Lecturer 2.3 16.8 28.7 24.8 29.7 101

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.5 19.9 33.3 22.7 24.1 141
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 26.0 50.6 16.2 7.1 154
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 21.2 49.8 17.3 11.7 614

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 21.1 44.8 19.8 14.4 668
..... Yes (%) 2.9 23.7 54.8 12.9 8.7 241
Back to top


H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 24.7 44.0 20.8 10.5 1036

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.6 13.1 46.7 30.4 9.8 214
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 26.0 44.0 22.7 7.3 273
..... Full Prof 3.2 34.7 48.6 13.7 3.0 432
..... Lecturer 1.9 6.0 22.2 24.8 47.0 117

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 1.9 5.1 21.7 30.3 42.9 175
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 16.1 54.6 24.7 4.6 174
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 31.9 47.0 17.3 3.8 687

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 20.2 44.8 22.8 12.1 766
..... Yes (%) 3.1 37.4 41.9 14.8 5.9 270
Back to top


H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 40.1 59.9 1055

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate
Rank* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 52.3 47.7 216
..... Assoc Prof 13.8 86.2 276
..... Full Prof 36.7 63.3 439
..... Lecturer 89.5 10.5 124

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate
Tenure Track Status* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 87.5 12.5 184
..... TT: Non-Tenured 42.9 57.1 175
..... TT: Tenured 26.9 73.1 696

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate
A2: Ever held an administrative positionNo (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... No (%) 39.7 60.3 780
..... Yes (%) 41.1 58.9 275
Back to top


H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 41.2 58.8 1055

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter
Rank* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 96.8 3.2 216
..... Assoc Prof 24.6 75.4 276
..... Full Prof 8.2 91.8 439
..... Lecturer 98.4 1.6 124

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter
Tenure Track Status* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 97.3 2.7 184
..... TT: Non-Tenured 96.0 4.0 175
..... TT: Tenured 12.6 87.4 696

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter
A2: Ever held an administrative position* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... No (%) 49.4 50.6 780
..... Yes (%) 18.2 81.8 275
Back to top


H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 59.3 40.7 1055

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member
Rank* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 100.0 . 216
..... Assoc Prof 64.5 35.5 276
..... Full Prof 25.7 74.3 439
..... Lecturer 96.0 4.0 124

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member
Tenure Track Status* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 97.3 2.7 184
..... TT: Non-Tenured 99.4 0.6 175
..... TT: Tenured 39.2 60.8 696

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member
A2: Ever held an administrative position* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... No (%) 68.6 31.4 780
..... Yes (%) 33.1 66.9 275
Back to top


H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 77.9 22.1 1055

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process
Rank* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 48.1 51.9 216
..... Assoc Prof 94.9 5.1 276
..... Full Prof 98.4 1.6 439
..... Lecturer 19.4 80.6 124

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process
Tenure Track Status* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 20.1 79.9 184
..... TT: Non-Tenured 56.6 43.4 175
..... TT: Tenured 98.6 1.4 696

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process
A2: Ever held an administrative position* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... No (%) 73.1 26.9 780
..... Yes (%) 91.6 8.4 275
Back to top


H8: Understand dept RPT standards

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 41.3 39.2 14.3 5.2 1040

H8: Understand dept RPT standards
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 18.2 49.1 23.8 8.9 214
..... Assoc Prof 3.2 39.9 42.1 15.4 2.6 273
..... Full Prof 3.6 61.1 35.4 3.2 0.2 435
..... Lecturer 2.3 12.7 28.8 35.6 22.9 118

H8: Understand dept RPT standards
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.3 11.4 30.1 34.1 24.4 176
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 20.1 53.4 23.6 2.9 174
..... TT: Tenured 3.5 54.2 38.0 7.0 0.9 690

H8: Understand dept RPT standards
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 33.6 43.0 16.8 6.6 768
..... Yes (%) 3.5 62.9 28.7 7.4 1.1 272
Back to top


H9: Understand dept RPT procedures

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 45.1 37.8 12.4 4.7 1036

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 20.4 49.8 20.9 9.0 211
..... Assoc Prof 3.3 44.3 44.0 10.6 1.1 273
..... Full Prof 3.6 66.2 31.0 2.8 . 435
..... Lecturer 2.3 12.8 27.4 36.8 23.1 117

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.3 13.2 24.7 36.8 25.3 174
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 22.7 56.4 18.6 2.3 172
..... TT: Tenured 3.5 58.7 36.5 4.6 0.1 690

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.1 37.7 41.8 14.8 5.7 766
..... Yes (%) 3.6 65.9 26.7 5.6 1.9 270
Back to top


H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 33.0 44.3 14.9 7.7 857

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 18.3 56.7 13.3 11.7 120
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 26.4 43.9 19.1 10.6 246
..... Full Prof 3.2 42.6 41.6 12.3 3.5 430
..... Lecturer 2.7 21.3 41.0 19.7 18.0 61

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 21.7 48.2 14.5 15.7 83
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 17.9 52.8 17.0 12.3 106
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 36.8 42.5 14.7 6.0 668

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.9 26.4 47.9 16.7 9.0 603
..... Yes (%) 3.3 48.8 35.8 10.6 4.7 254
Back to top


H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 38.7 46.3 9.0 6.1 856

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.0 25.2 55.3 11.4 8.1 123
..... Assoc Prof 3.1 33.2 48.6 10.1 8.1 247
..... Full Prof 3.4 48.1 42.7 6.6 2.6 426
..... Lecturer 2.7 21.7 43.3 16.7 18.3 60

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 20.2 51.2 13.1 15.5 84
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 27.1 51.4 13.1 8.4 107
..... TT: Tenured 3.3 42.9 44.8 7.8 4.5 665

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.1 31.5 50.3 10.7 7.4 606
..... Yes (%) 3.5 56.0 36.4 4.8 2.8 250
Back to top


H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 10.6 57.9 25.6 5.9 939

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students
Rank- Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 12.4 63.7 18.1 5.7 193
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 8.4 50.6 33.5 7.5 239
..... Full Prof 2.8 11.4 58.3 25.8 4.5 403
..... Lecturer 2.7 9.6 62.5 20.2 7.7 104

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 11.5 64.2 17.6 6.8 148
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 11.1 63.0 21.0 4.9 162
..... TT: Tenured 2.7 10.3 55.2 28.6 5.9 629

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 11.1 58.0 24.3 6.6 683
..... Yes (%) 2.7 9.4 57.8 28.9 3.9 256
Back to top


H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 8.9 54.6 29.1 7.4 853

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.7 9.2 63.8 19.6 7.4 163
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 7.1 53.3 30.7 8.9 225
..... Full Prof 2.6 8.9 49.7 34.4 7.0 384
..... Lecturer 2.9 13.6 63.0 18.5 4.9 81

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 10.0 67.5 16.7 5.8 120
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 10.2 61.3 21.9 6.6 137
..... TT: Tenured 2.6 8.4 50.5 33.2 7.9 596

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 10.0 55.1 27.1 7.8 617
..... Yes (%) 2.6 5.9 53.4 34.3 6.4 236
Back to top


H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 8.7 49.8 29.8 11.7 265

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 18.9 58.5 17.0 5.7 53
..... Assoc Prof 2.3 . 46.3 38.8 14.9 67
..... Full Prof 2.4 7.0 45.3 31.4 16.3 86
..... Lecturer 2.7 11.9 52.5 28.8 6.8 59

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 11.4 53.2 27.8 7.6 79
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 20.5 56.4 17.9 5.1 39
..... TT: Tenured 2.4 4.1 46.3 34.0 15.6 147

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.6 11.5 50.0 28.1 10.4 192
..... Yes (%) 2.4 1.4 49.3 34.2 15.1 73
Back to top


H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 10.9 55.8 24.0 9.3 579

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 16.5 56.5 22.6 4.3 115
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 6.6 52.6 30.3 10.5 152
..... Full Prof 2.6 8.1 54.0 24.7 13.2 235
..... Lecturer 3.0 19.5 66.2 11.7 2.6 77

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.0 18.5 63.9 14.8 2.8 108
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 13.7 58.9 23.2 4.2 95
..... TT: Tenured 2.6 8.0 52.7 26.9 12.5 376

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 12.8 54.5 23.6 9.2 437
..... Yes (%) 2.6 4.9 59.9 25.4 9.9 142
Back to top


H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 9.8 56.0 25.1 9.1 634

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 14.5 59.5 20.6 5.3 131
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 7.1 53.3 29.0 10.7 169
..... Full Prof 2.6 7.7 54.9 27.1 10.3 273
..... Lecturer 2.9 16.4 60.7 14.8 8.2 61

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 17.2 59.1 17.2 6.5 93
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 11.8 62.7 19.1 6.4 110
..... TT: Tenured 2.6 7.7 53.6 28.3 10.4 431

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 11.9 55.4 23.2 9.5 462
..... Yes (%) 2.6 4.1 57.6 30.2 8.1 172
Back to top


H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 8.7 49.5 31.8 10.0 804

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.7 12.3 54.1 27.4 6.2 146
..... Assoc Prof 2.5 4.1 51.6 30.8 13.6 221
..... Full Prof 2.6 9.0 46.2 35.9 9.0 368
..... Lecturer 2.7 14.5 50.7 23.2 11.6 69

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 13.5 52.9 23.1 10.6 104
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 12.3 53.3 27.9 6.6 122
..... TT: Tenured 2.5 7.1 48.1 34.3 10.6 578

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.6 9.9 50.0 29.5 10.6 586
..... Yes (%) 2.5 5.5 48.2 38.1 8.3 218
Back to top


H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 17.5 52.4 22.5 7.6 952

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 13.3 57.5 24.3 5.0 181
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 13.1 53.2 24.2 9.5 252
..... Full Prof 2.9 22.9 53.4 18.4 5.3 414
..... Lecturer 2.5 14.3 38.1 31.4 16.2 105

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.6 14.3 42.2 29.9 13.6 147
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 12.5 57.9 24.3 5.3 152
..... TT: Tenured 2.9 19.4 53.4 20.4 6.7 653

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 15.5 51.5 23.9 9.2 686
..... Yes (%) 3.0 22.9 54.9 18.8 3.4 266
Back to top


H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 32.8 49.2 13.1 4.8 868

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.0 28.2 53.4 12.1 6.3 174
..... Assoc Prof 3.1 35.2 46.7 13.7 4.4 227
..... Full Prof 3.2 38.1 49.0 10.2 2.8 394
..... Lecturer 2.5 8.2 47.9 30.1 13.7 73

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 15.8 48.2 25.4 10.5 114
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 26.4 55.4 12.2 6.1 148
..... TT: Tenured 3.2 37.6 47.9 11.1 3.5 606

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 30.1 49.2 15.0 5.8 622
..... Yes (%) 3.3 39.8 49.2 8.5 2.4 246
Back to top


H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 19.0 45.0 21.8 14.2 289

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature
RankMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 23.2 48.2 12.5 16.1 56
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 11.4 51.4 22.9 14.3 70
..... Full Prof 2.8 24.5 43.1 22.5 9.8 102
..... Lecturer 2.5 14.8 37.7 27.9 19.7 61

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.5 17.3 38.3 25.9 18.5 81
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 18.2 47.7 18.2 15.9 44
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 20.1 47.6 20.7 11.6 164

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.6 16.7 42.1 23.9 17.2 209
..... Yes (%) 3.0 25.0 52.5 16.3 6.3 80
Back to top


H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 15.1 56.6 21.1 7.3 564

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation
RankMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 14.2 60.4 21.7 3.8 106
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 12.8 49.7 27.5 10.1 149
..... Full Prof 2.9 17.7 59.5 16.9 5.9 237
..... Lecturer 2.7 12.5 55.6 20.8 11.1 72

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 12.2 57.1 19.4 11.2 98
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 14.3 58.2 25.3 2.2 91
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 16.0 56.0 20.5 7.5 375

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 15.2 54.6 22.6 7.6 421
..... Yes (%) 2.9 14.7 62.2 16.8 6.3 143
Back to top


H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 16.8 54.3 19.9 9.1 715

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 14.3 56.4 22.9 6.4 140
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 14.2 52.3 21.8 11.7 197
..... Full Prof 2.9 20.8 57.1 15.1 7.1 312
..... Lecturer 2.5 10.6 42.4 30.3 16.7 66

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.6 15.8 43.6 26.7 13.9 101
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 10.2 59.3 23.7 6.8 118
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 18.5 55.2 17.5 8.7 496

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 17.0 52.8 20.3 9.9 517
..... Yes (%) 2.8 16.2 58.1 18.7 7.1 198
Back to top


H13f: Department rewards professional service

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 12.2 55.6 24.1 8.2 855

H13f: Department rewards professional service
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 11.0 59.1 24.7 5.2 154
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 10.7 50.2 27.0 12.0 233
..... Full Prof 2.8 13.6 59.4 21.6 5.4 389
..... Lecturer 2.5 11.4 45.6 26.6 16.5 79

H13f: Department rewards professional service
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.6 11.4 49.1 24.6 14.9 114
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 9.8 59.4 26.3 4.5 133
..... TT: Tenured 2.7 12.8 55.9 23.5 7.7 608

H13f: Department rewards professional service
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 11.9 53.2 25.5 9.4 615
..... Yes (%) 2.8 12.9 61.7 20.4 5.0 240
Back to top

Continue to Section I: Post-Tenure Review


View These Results by College

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page