NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

Tables of Results
by College


The following tables provide results to questions in Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure, broken down by college. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between colleges are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section H by Academic Profile | Section H by Demographic Profile


H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 31.7 45.8 16.8 5.8 1026

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 29.6 42.8 21.8 5.8 257
..... CED 3.0 25.5 48.9 21.3 4.3 47
..... CHASS 3.1 35.7 46.7 12.9 4.8 210
..... CNR 3.0 25.9 50.0 18.5 5.6 54
..... COE 2.9 29.0 43.4 19.3 8.3 145
..... COM 3.0 26.4 52.8 11.3 9.4 53
..... COT 3.1 33.3 48.1 18.5 . 27
..... CVM 3.4 54.3 32.9 8.6 4.3 70
..... Design 3.0 34.8 34.8 21.7 8.7 23
..... FYC 2.6 . 80.0 . 20.0 5
..... PAMS 3.1 27.8 54.6 15.7 1.9 108
..... Student Affairs 2.9 25.9 51.9 7.4 14.8 27
Back to top


H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 35.4 49.5 11.4 3.7 1027

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.2 34.9 51.2 11.6 2.3 258
..... CED 3.1 34.0 44.7 14.9 6.4 47
..... CHASS 3.2 35.2 49.3 13.1 2.3 213
..... CNR 3.2 38.5 48.1 9.6 3.8 52
..... COE 3.1 32.9 50.7 11.6 4.8 146
..... COM 3.0 34.0 43.4 15.1 7.5 53
..... COT 3.3 29.6 66.7 3.7 . 27
..... CVM 3.4 52.9 38.6 4.3 4.3 70
..... Design 3.0 39.1 30.4 26.1 4.3 23
..... FYC 2.6 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 3.2 32.4 57.4 7.4 2.8 108
..... Student Affairs 2.9 28.0 48.0 12.0 12.0 25
Back to top


H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 34.9 55.3 6.9 2.8 880

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.3 38.2 56.1 5.7 . 246
..... CED 3.1 29.3 58.5 7.3 4.9 41
..... CHASS 3.3 38.6 52.4 6.9 2.1 145
..... CNR 3.2 39.2 49.0 5.9 5.9 51
..... COE 3.1 27.6 58.5 8.9 4.9 123
..... COM 3.0 28.9 51.1 11.1 8.9 45
..... COT 3.2 34.6 50.0 11.5 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.3 38.8 56.7 3.0 1.5 67
..... Design 3.1 33.3 50.0 12.5 4.2 24
..... FYC 2.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 2
..... PAMS 3.3 32.2 64.4 2.3 1.1 87
..... Student Affairs 2.9 30.4 39.1 21.7 8.7 23
Back to top


H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 38.1 53.4 5.9 2.6 812

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.3 41.9 48.9 7.9 1.3 227
..... CED 3.1 27.0 64.9 2.7 5.4 37
..... CHASS 3.4 42.6 50.7 5.9 0.7 136
..... CNR 3.3 40.0 51.1 6.7 2.2 45
..... COE 3.2 31.0 57.5 7.1 4.4 113
..... COM 3.3 30.8 69.2 . . 39
..... COT 3.2 30.4 60.9 8.7 . 23
..... CVM 3.4 46.2 46.2 6.2 1.5 65
..... Design 3.0 42.9 33.3 9.5 14.3 21
..... FYC 2.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 2
..... PAMS 3.3 35.8 61.7 1.2 1.2 81
..... Student Affairs 3.0 26.1 56.5 4.3 13.0 23
Back to top


H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 33.3 47.8 12.3 6.6 805

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.1 37.2 42.7 16.2 3.8 234
..... CED 2.9 24.4 48.8 17.1 9.8 41
..... CHASS 3.1 38.3 42.2 10.9 8.6 128
..... CNR 3.2 36.0 56.0 2.0 6.0 50
..... COE 2.9 25.0 51.9 15.7 7.4 108
..... COM 2.9 25.0 50.0 12.5 12.5 40
..... COT 3.2 26.3 63.2 10.5 . 19
..... CVM 3.3 42.4 48.5 7.6 1.5 66
..... Design 3.0 33.3 42.9 9.5 14.3 21
..... FYC 2.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 2
..... PAMS 3.1 28.4 59.5 10.8 1.4 74
..... Student Affairs 2.6 27.3 40.9 . 31.8 22
Back to top


H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 23.0 47.3 22.1 7.6 934

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 28.4 45.6 22.4 3.6 250
..... CED 2.7 15.2 50.0 26.1 8.7 46
..... CHASS 2.8 24.4 43.5 22.8 9.3 193
..... CNR 2.9 28.3 43.4 20.8 7.5 53
..... COE 2.8 20.8 47.5 25.8 5.8 120
..... COM 2.6 12.5 54.2 14.6 18.8 48
..... COT 2.7 15.8 42.1 42.1 . 19
..... CVM 3.1 28.4 55.2 11.9 4.5 67
..... Design 2.7 19.0 47.6 14.3 19.0 21
..... FYC 2.6 . 80.0 . 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.8 16.7 53.6 26.2 3.6 84
..... Student Affairs 2.4 14.3 39.3 14.3 32.1 28
Back to top


H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 29.1 51.1 12.5 7.4 938

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.2 36.4 48.8 10.8 4.0 250
..... CED 2.8 19.6 54.3 15.2 10.9 46
..... CHASS 3.0 32.8 46.2 12.8 8.2 195
..... CNR 3.0 26.4 54.7 11.3 7.5 53
..... COE 2.9 18.6 55.9 19.5 5.9 118
..... COM 2.9 14.6 66.7 8.3 10.4 48
..... COT 3.0 25.0 45.0 30.0 . 20
..... CVM 3.2 40.6 47.8 5.8 5.8 69
..... Design 2.9 30.0 50.0 . 20.0 20
..... FYC 2.6 . 80.0 . 20.0 5
..... PAMS 3.0 25.6 58.1 11.6 4.7 86
..... Student Affairs 2.4 17.9 32.1 17.9 32.1 28
Back to top


H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 18.0 37.5 32.7 11.8 931

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 19.8 38.3 34.7 7.3 248
..... CED 2.5 13.0 37.0 37.0 13.0 46
..... CHASS 2.7 22.8 31.6 34.7 10.9 193
..... CNR 2.5 13.2 39.6 26.4 20.8 53
..... COE 2.6 15.1 39.5 33.6 11.8 119
..... COM 2.5 13.0 41.3 26.1 19.6 46
..... COT 2.5 15.8 26.3 52.6 5.3 19
..... CVM 2.7 23.2 36.2 31.9 8.7 69
..... Design 2.3 19.0 23.8 23.8 33.3 21
..... FYC 2.6 . 80.0 . 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.7 14.1 49.4 29.4 7.1 85
..... Student Affairs 2.1 11.1 29.6 22.2 37.0 27
Back to top


H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 21.8 47.4 17.9 12.9 909

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)

1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 27.3 47.8 18.8 6.1 245
..... CED 2.7 19.6 50.0 15.2 15.2 46
..... CHASS 2.7 25.3 37.1 19.4 18.3 186
..... CNR 2.6 14.3 49.0 16.3 20.4 49
..... COE 2.7 12.2 56.5 16.5 14.8 115
..... COM 2.6 14.9 46.8 25.5 12.8 47
..... COT 2.8 27.8 33.3 27.8 11.1 18
..... CVM 3.0 27.9 51.5 10.3 10.3 68
..... Design 2.8 30.0 35.0 20.0 15.0 20
..... FYC 2.2 . 60.0 . 40.0 5
..... PAMS 2.9 15.7 62.7 15.7 6.0 83
..... Student Affairs 2.3 14.8 29.6 22.2 33.3 27
Back to top


H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 24.7 44.0 20.8 10.5 1036

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.9 24.6 48.1 21.2 6.1 264
..... CED 2.9 32.0 30.0 34.0 4.0 50
..... CHASS 2.6 22.4 36.2 18.6 22.9 210
..... CNR 3.0 27.8 51.9 13.0 7.4 54
..... COE 2.9 25.5 44.1 22.8 7.6 145
..... COM 2.9 23.1 46.2 26.9 3.8 52
..... COT 3.4 48.1 44.4 3.7 3.7 27
..... CVM 3.1 30.0 47.1 21.4 1.4 70
..... Design 3.1 37.5 41.7 16.7 4.2 24
..... FYC 1.8 . 40.0 . 60.0 5
..... PAMS 2.8 17.8 51.4 19.6 11.2 107
..... Student Affairs 2.2 7.1 35.7 28.6 28.6 28
Back to top


H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 40.1 59.9 1055

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate
College of appointment* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... CALS 31.5 68.5 267
..... CED 51.0 49.0 51
..... CHASS 47.9 52.1 217
..... CNR 36.4 63.6 55
..... COE 40.9 59.1 149
..... COM 35.8 64.2 53
..... COT 25.9 74.1 27
..... CVM 29.6 70.4 71
..... Design 29.2 70.8 24
..... FYC 80.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 46.3 53.7 108
..... Student Affairs 71.4 28.6 28
Back to top


H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 41.2 58.8 1055

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter
College of appointment* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... CALS 30.3 69.7 267
..... CED 47.1 52.9 51
..... CHASS 54.8 45.2 217
..... CNR 43.6 56.4 55
..... COE 38.9 61.1 149
..... COM 41.5 58.5 53
..... COT 33.3 66.7 27
..... CVM 33.8 66.2 71
..... Design 37.5 62.5 24
..... FYC 60.0 40.0 5
..... PAMS 35.2 64.8 108
..... Student Affairs 85.7 14.3 28
Back to top


H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 59.3 40.7 1055

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member
College of appointment* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... CALS 57.7 42.3 267
..... CED 58.8 41.2 51
..... CHASS 66.8 33.2 217
..... CNR 50.9 49.1 55
..... COE 61.1 38.9 149
..... COM 49.1 50.9 53
..... COT 48.1 51.9 27
..... CVM 54.9 45.1 71
..... Design 37.5 62.5 24
..... FYC 60.0 40.0 5
..... PAMS 61.1 38.9 108
..... Student Affairs 78.6 21.4 28
Back to top


H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process

  No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 77.9 22.1 1055

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process
College of appointment* No (%) Yes (%) Total(N)
..... CALS 84.3 15.7 267
..... CED 66.7 33.3 51
..... CHASS 65.9 34.1 217
..... CNR 83.6 16.4 55
..... COE 82.6 17.4 149
..... COM 75.5 24.5 53
..... COT 92.6 7.4 27
..... CVM 84.5 15.5 71
..... Design 95.8 4.2 24
..... FYC 40.0 60.0 5
..... PAMS 84.3 15.7 108
..... Student Affairs 35.7 64.3 28
Back to top


H8: Understand dept RPT standards

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 41.3 39.2 14.3 5.2 1040

H8: Understand dept RPT standards
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.2 41.1 44.1 11.8 3.0 263
..... CED 3.0 36.0 32.0 26.0 6.0 50
..... CHASS 3.0 38.5 35.7 16.0 9.9 213
..... CNR 3.1 37.0 40.7 18.5 3.7 54
..... COE 3.2 42.5 39.0 13.0 5.5 146
..... COM 3.3 46.2 38.5 11.5 3.8 52
..... COT 3.4 44.4 51.9 3.7 . 27
..... CVM 3.3 50.7 32.4 16.9 . 71
..... Design 3.3 41.7 45.8 12.5 . 24
..... FYC 3.0 60.0 . 20.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 3.2 41.1 41.1 14.0 3.7 107
..... Student Affairs 2.9 35.7 32.1 14.3 17.9 28
Back to top


H9: Understand dept RPT procedures

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 45.1 37.8 12.4 4.7 1036

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.3 47.7 39.7 9.5 3.1 262
..... CED 3.1 40.0 32.0 22.0 6.0 50
..... CHASS 3.0 40.4 32.9 16.9 9.9 213
..... CNR 3.2 44.4 35.2 18.5 1.9 54
..... COE 3.3 45.5 44.1 7.6 2.8 145
..... COM 3.2 38.5 44.2 13.5 3.8 52
..... COT 3.6 59.3 37.0 3.7 . 27
..... CVM 3.4 52.1 33.8 12.7 1.4 71
..... Design 3.2 45.8 29.2 20.8 4.2 24
..... FYC 3.0 60.0 . 20.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 3.3 45.3 42.5 9.4 2.8 106
..... Student Affairs 3.0 40.7 37.0 7.4 14.8 27
Back to top


H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 33.0 44.3 14.9 7.7 857

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.2 41.6 40.7 14.5 3.2 221
..... CED 2.8 30.8 35.9 20.5 12.8 39
..... CHASS 2.9 25.8 44.2 22.1 8.0 163
..... CNR 2.9 25.0 50.0 15.9 9.1 44
..... COE 3.1 30.4 52.0 10.4 7.2 125
..... COM 2.8 33.3 31.1 15.6 20.0 45
..... COT 2.8 20.0 48.0 20.0 12.0 25
..... CVM 3.3 50.8 34.9 7.9 6.3 63
..... Design 3.0 38.9 38.9 5.6 16.7 18
..... FYC 2.5 50.0 . . 50.0 2
..... PAMS 3.1 25.6 60.0 12.2 2.2 90
..... Student Affairs 2.5 22.7 36.4 13.6 27.3 22
Back to top


H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 38.7 46.3 9.0 6.1 856

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.3 44.7 46.9 4.4 4.0 226
..... CED 3.2 42.1 47.4 2.6 7.9 38
..... CHASS 3.1 36.0 44.7 13.7 5.6 161
..... CNR 3.2 42.9 40.5 14.3 2.4 42
..... COE 3.2 34.1 53.2 7.9 4.8 126
..... COM 2.9 38.1 26.2 23.8 11.9 42
..... COT 3.1 28.0 60.0 4.0 8.0 25
..... CVM 3.4 49.2 42.6 3.3 4.9 61
..... Design 2.9 38.9 33.3 11.1 16.7 18
..... FYC 2.5 50.0 . . 50.0 2
..... PAMS 3.1 30.4 55.4 12.0 2.2 92
..... Student Affairs 2.5 26.1 30.4 8.7 34.8 23
Back to top


H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 10.6 57.9 25.6 5.9 939

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students
College of appointment Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 12.6 54.5 26.6 6.3 222
..... CED 2.8 6.3 72.9 18.8 2.1 48
..... CHASS 2.7 8.5 56.8 26.6 8.0 199
..... CNR 2.8 14.0 54.0 28.0 4.0 50
..... COE 2.7 9.4 57.2 31.2 2.2 138
..... COM 2.7 6.3 64.6 22.9 6.3 48
..... COT 2.8 12.5 58.3 20.8 8.3 24
..... CVM 2.8 10.8 66.2 15.4 7.7 65
..... Design 2.7 13.0 52.2 30.4 4.3 23
..... FYC 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 4
..... PAMS 2.7 12.6 54.7 26.3 6.3 95
..... Student Affairs 2.9 17.4 65.2 8.7 8.7 23
Back to top


H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 8.9 54.6 29.1 7.4 853

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge
College of appointment Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 11.4 53.6 28.6 6.4 220
..... CED 2.7 2.3 65.9 27.3 4.5 44
..... CHASS 2.6 8.1 49.7 34.7 7.5 173
..... CNR 2.7 12.0 52.0 28.0 8.0 50
..... COE 2.7 9.3 52.5 33.9 4.2 118
..... COM 2.6 7.3 56.1 24.4 12.2 41
..... COT 2.8 4.2 66.7 29.2 . 24
..... CVM 2.7 7.9 60.3 22.2 9.5 63
..... Design 2.6 10.0 50.0 25.0 15.0 20
..... FYC 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 4
..... PAMS 2.6 6.2 56.8 25.9 11.1 81
..... Student Affairs 2.9 20.0 66.7 . 13.3 15
Back to top


H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 8.7 49.8 29.8 11.7 265

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 15.7 58.8 17.6 7.8 51
..... CED 2.7 11.1 55.6 22.2 11.1 18
..... CHASS 2.3 4.8 40.5 36.9 17.9 84
..... CNR 2.8 8.3 66.7 25.0 . 12
..... COE 2.5 . 64.0 24.0 12.0 25
..... COM 2.8 12.5 50.0 37.5 . 8
..... COT 2.4 . 37.5 62.5 . 8
..... CVM 2.7 14.3 57.1 14.3 14.3 7
..... Design 2.1 . 30.0 50.0 20.0 20
..... FYC 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 2
..... PAMS 2.8 13.3 60.0 20.0 6.7 15
..... Student Affairs 2.9 26.7 46.7 20.0 6.7 15
Back to top


H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 10.9 55.8 24.0 9.3 579

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 11.3 56.3 23.8 8.6 151
..... CED 2.9 11.4 65.7 20.0 2.9 35
..... CHASS 2.9 17.4 53.3 27.2 2.2 92
..... CNR 2.5 6.1 57.6 21.2 15.2 33
..... COE 2.4 5.4 45.7 32.6 16.3 92
..... COM 2.7 12.5 56.3 21.9 9.4 32
..... COT 2.8 5.6 77.8 11.1 5.6 18
..... CVM 2.5 8.8 52.9 20.6 17.6 34
..... Design 2.6 9.5 52.4 23.8 14.3 21
..... FYC 3.0 . 100.0 . . 2
..... PAMS 2.6 8.0 58.0 24.0 10.0 50
..... Student Affairs 3.2 26.3 68.4 5.3 . 19
Back to top


H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 9.8 56.0 25.1 9.1 634

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 13.8 49.2 27.5 9.5 189
..... CED 2.8 10.0 62.5 22.5 5.0 40
..... CHASS 2.6 6.9 53.9 28.4 10.8 102
..... CNR 2.7 14.6 48.8 26.8 9.8 41
..... COE 2.5 1.1 59.1 30.7 9.1 88
..... COM 2.7 7.4 63.0 18.5 11.1 27
..... COT 2.9 4.8 81.0 14.3 . 21
..... CVM 2.7 4.4 64.4 24.4 6.7 45
..... Design 2.8 20.0 45.0 25.0 10.0 20
..... FYC 2.0 . . 100.0 . 1
..... PAMS 2.7 9.3 62.8 14.0 14.0 43
..... Student Affairs 3.2 29.4 64.7 . 5.9 17
Back to top


H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 8.7 49.5 31.8 10.0 804

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 11.5 50.9 28.3 9.3 226
..... CED 2.5 7.0 46.5 37.2 9.3 43
..... CHASS 2.4 5.8 42.4 38.8 12.9 139
..... CNR 2.6 14.6 43.8 31.3 10.4 48
..... COE 2.4 3.5 47.4 38.6 10.5 114
..... COM 2.6 5.3 55.3 28.9 10.5 38
..... COT 2.6 . 72.7 18.2 9.1 22
..... CVM 2.7 9.7 58.1 27.4 4.8 62
..... Design 2.4 5.9 41.2 41.2 11.8 17
..... FYC 2.0 . . 100.0 . 2
..... PAMS 2.7 11.3 50.7 31.0 7.0 71
..... Student Affairs 2.9 22.7 59.1 . 18.2 22
Back to top


H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 17.5 52.4 22.5 7.6 952

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 23.6 55.4 16.3 4.7 233
..... CED 2.8 14.9 55.3 25.5 4.3 47
..... CHASS 2.7 18.6 47.7 21.1 12.6 199
..... CNR 2.7 10.4 58.3 25.0 6.3 48
..... COE 2.6 10.5 51.9 28.6 9.0 133
..... COM 2.7 11.8 56.9 25.5 5.9 51
..... COT 3.0 30.4 47.8 13.0 8.7 23
..... CVM 2.9 20.9 50.7 23.9 4.5 67
..... Design 2.8 18.2 50.0 22.7 9.1 22
..... FYC 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.8 14.4 53.6 25.8 6.2 97
..... Student Affairs 2.6 14.8 44.4 29.6 11.1 27
Back to top


H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 32.8 49.2 13.1 4.8 868

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.2 34.0 51.3 11.3 3.4 238
..... CED 3.2 37.8 44.4 15.6 2.2 45
..... CHASS 3.1 33.9 45.5 13.9 6.7 165
..... CNR 3.1 34.7 46.9 12.2 6.1 49
..... COE 3.0 26.0 52.8 14.6 6.5 123
..... COM 3.0 23.7 55.3 15.8 5.3 38
..... COT 3.1 28.6 52.4 19.0 . 21
..... CVM 3.5 56.1 39.4 3.0 1.5 66
..... Design 2.9 14.3 66.7 9.5 9.5 21
..... FYC 2.0 . 25.0 50.0 25.0 4
..... PAMS 3.2 32.1 54.3 12.3 1.2 81
..... Student Affairs 2.2 5.9 29.4 41.2 23.5 17
Back to top


H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 19.0 45.0 21.8 14.2 289

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 22.2 59.3 13.0 5.6 54
..... CED 2.6 12.5 43.8 37.5 6.3 16
..... CHASS 2.6 20.0 39.0 21.0 20.0 100
..... CNR 2.6 . 63.6 36.4 . 11
..... COE 2.7 13.6 50.0 27.3 9.1 22
..... COM 2.6 12.5 50.0 25.0 12.5 8
..... COT 1.9 . 12.5 62.5 25.0 8
..... CVM 3.0 37.5 37.5 12.5 12.5 8
..... Design 3.0 22.7 63.6 4.5 9.1 22
..... FYC 2.0 . 25.0 50.0 25.0 4
..... PAMS 2.6 18.8 43.8 12.5 25.0 16
..... Student Affairs 2.6 30.0 20.0 30.0 20.0 20
Back to top


H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 15.1 56.6 21.1 7.3 564

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 22.2 58.2 16.3 3.3 153
..... CED 2.8 12.0 52.0 36.0 . 25
..... CHASS 2.5 14.1 43.5 24.7 17.6 85
..... CNR 2.7 6.3 68.8 15.6 9.4 32
..... COE 2.7 7.6 58.7 27.2 6.5 92
..... COM 2.8 13.3 60.0 23.3 3.3 30
..... COT 2.9 17.6 64.7 5.9 11.8 17
..... CVM 2.9 21.1 55.3 18.4 5.3 38
..... Design 2.7 10.0 60.0 20.0 10.0 20
..... FYC 2.3 . 50.0 25.0 25.0 4
..... PAMS 2.8 12.8 61.7 19.1 6.4 47
..... Student Affairs 2.9 19.0 52.4 23.8 4.8 21
Back to top


H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 16.8 54.3 19.9 9.1 715

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.1 25.8 61.2 9.6 3.3 209
..... CED 2.6 6.8 50.0 36.4 6.8 44
..... CHASS 2.4 7.4 43.8 28.1 20.7 121
..... CNR 2.8 16.7 54.8 21.4 7.1 42
..... COE 2.6 9.8 53.3 25.0 12.0 92
..... COM 2.5 10.3 48.3 24.1 17.2 29
..... COT 2.9 9.5 71.4 19.0 . 21
..... CVM 3.1 27.8 53.7 14.8 3.7 54
..... Design 2.9 19.0 57.1 19.0 4.8 21
..... FYC 2.8 . 75.0 25.0 . 4
..... PAMS 2.8 17.2 53.4 19.0 10.3 58
..... Student Affairs 2.8 20.0 45.0 25.0 10.0 20
Back to top


H13f: Department rewards professional service

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 12.2 55.6 24.1 8.2 855

H13f: Department rewards professional service
College of appointment Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.9 14.9 60.4 19.6 5.1 235
..... CED 2.6 13.0 45.7 30.4 10.9 46
..... CHASS 2.6 9.3 51.0 25.8 13.9 151
..... CNR 2.7 15.2 50.0 23.9 10.9 46
..... COE 2.7 8.6 55.2 29.3 6.9 116
..... COM 2.5 7.1 50.0 28.6 14.3 42
..... COT 2.6 8.7 56.5 21.7 13.0 23
..... CVM 2.9 15.9 60.3 19.0 4.8 63
..... Design 2.8 14.3 57.1 19.0 9.5 21
..... FYC 2.3 . 25.0 75.0 . 4
..... PAMS 2.8 13.3 60.2 24.1 2.4 83
..... Student Affairs 2.6 12.0 52.0 24.0 12.0 25
Back to top

Continue to Section I: Post-Tenure Review


View These Results by Academic Profile

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page