NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section D: Faculty-Administrative Relationships

Tables of Results
by Demographic Profile


The following tables provide results to questions in Section D: Faculty-Administrative Relationships, broken down by gender, race/ethnicity, citizenship status, age, and number of years employed at NC State. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between groups (e.g., between women and men) are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section D: Faculty-Administrative Relationships results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section D by College | Section D by Academic Profile


D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 50.7 37.2 8.5 3.6 1100

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 3.3 51.1 32.0 10.8 6.2 325
..... Male 3.4 50.6 39.4 7.5 2.6 775

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 3.3 47.1 43.1 3.9 5.9 51
..... Asian 3.4 50.0 40.7 7.0 2.3 86
..... Hispanic 3.0 37.5 41.7 8.3 12.5 24
..... White 3.4 51.4 36.3 8.9 3.4 936

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 3.4 51.7 35.9 8.7 3.7 919
.... Resident Alien 3.3 45.8 43.7 8.5 2.1 142
..... NonRes Alien 3.3 46.2 43.6 2.6 7.7 39

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 3.3 50.7 36.2 9.0 4.1 221
..... 40 to 55 3.3 48.2 39.2 8.5 4.1 531
..... 56 and over 3.4 54.6 34.8 8.0 2.6 348

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 3.3 47.8 37.0 10.2 4.9 324
.... 7-15 3.3 50.2 36.0 9.2 4.6 303
..... 16-25 3.4 52.3 38.0 7.3 2.4 287
...... 26 or more 3.5 54.3 38.2 5.9 1.6 186
Back to top


D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 40.5 45.1 11.2 3.3 1094

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 3.2 45.0 36.0 13.0 5.9 322
..... Male 3.2 38.6 48.8 10.4 2.2 772

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 3.3 41.2 47.1 9.8 2.0 51
..... Asian 3.2 37.2 50.0 9.3 3.5 86
..... Hispanic 3.0 25.0 54.2 12.5 8.3 24
..... White 3.2 41.2 44.2 11.4 3.2 930

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 3.2 41.3 44.2 11.5 3.1 915
.... Resident Alien 3.2 36.4 50.0 10.0 3.6 140
..... NonRes Alien 3.1 35.9 48.7 7.7 7.7 39

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 3.2 37.3 47.0 12.9 2.8 217
..... 40 to 55 3.2 38.5 46.4 10.9 4.2 530
..... 56 and over 3.3 45.5 41.8 10.4 2.3 347

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 3.1 34.3 47.0 14.3 4.4 321
.... 7-15 3.2 42.3 43.0 10.3 4.3 300
..... 16-25 3.3 43.3 43.3 11.4 2.1 289
...... 26 or more 3.3 44.0 47.8 6.5 1.6 184
Back to top


D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 45.9 38.3 10.7 5.0 1093

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 3.1 44.0 34.7 13.3 8.0 323
..... Male 3.3 46.8 39.9 9.6 3.8 770

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 3.2 37.3 47.1 9.8 5.9 51
..... Asian 3.2 41.9 40.7 12.8 4.7 86
..... Hispanic 3.0 29.2 50.0 8.3 12.5 24
..... White 3.3 47.1 37.4 10.7 4.8 929

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 3.3 46.9 37.5 10.6 5.0 915
.... Resident Alien 3.2 42.4 40.3 12.2 5.0 139
..... NonRes Alien 3.2 35.9 51.3 7.7 5.1 39

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 3.3 46.6 38.4 10.5 4.6 219
..... 40 to 55 3.2 42.8 38.8 12.9 5.5 528
..... 56 and over 3.3 50.3 37.6 7.5 4.6 346

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 3.2 40.2 41.1 14.0 4.7 321
.... 7-15 3.2 47.3 33.7 12.0 7.0 300
..... 16-25 3.3 46.9 41.3 7.7 4.2 286
...... 26 or more 3.4 52.2 36.6 7.5 3.8 186
Back to top


D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 13.1 42.2 31.8 12.9 1088

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
GenderMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.6 17.2 39.7 30.3 12.8 320
..... Male 2.5 11.5 43.2 32.4 12.9 768

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.5 18.0 38.0 24.0 20.0 50
..... Asian 2.6 17.4 38.4 30.2 14.0 86
..... Hispanic 2.2 8.3 33.3 29.2 29.2 24
..... White 2.6 12.5 43.0 32.5 11.9 925

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.6 12.8 42.5 31.9 12.7 911
.... Resident Alien 2.6 15.2 40.6 31.9 12.3 138
..... NonRes Alien 2.5 12.8 41.0 28.2 17.9 39

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.6 15.3 38.1 34.0 12.6 215
..... 40 to 55 2.5 10.8 46.2 29.7 13.3 526
..... 56 and over 2.6 15.3 38.6 33.7 12.4 347

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.5 12.7 39.2 36.1 12.0 316
.... 7-15 2.6 13.4 43.5 28.1 15.1 299
..... 16-25 2.6 12.5 45.1 31.9 10.4 288
...... 26 or more 2.6 14.6 40.5 30.3 14.6 185
Back to top


D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.3 7.7 36.1 38.7 17.5 1077

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
GenderMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.4 10.3 34.4 38.3 17.0 311
..... Male 2.3 6.7 36.8 38.9 17.6 766

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.3 8.2 40.8 28.6 22.4 49
..... Asian 2.5 9.3 41.9 36.0 12.8 86
..... Hispanic 2.3 13.0 30.4 26.1 30.4 23
..... White 2.3 7.3 35.6 39.7 17.4 916

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.3 7.7 35.5 39.0 17.8 899
.... Resident Alien 2.4 7.2 40.3 37.4 15.1 139
..... NonRes Alien 2.4 10.3 35.9 35.9 17.9 39

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.4 7.6 35.7 41.0 15.7 210
..... 40 to 55 2.3 6.7 37.7 38.4 17.2 523
..... 56 and over 2.3 9.3 34.0 37.8 18.9 344

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.3 7.4 32.2 43.7 16.7 311
.... 7-15 2.4 6.4 40.9 34.9 17.8 298
..... 16-25 2.4 8.4 36.5 39.3 15.8 285
...... 26 or more 2.3 9.3 34.4 35.5 20.8 183
Back to top


D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept

  Mean Rating 4: Very
familiar (%)
3: Somewhat
familiar (%)
2: Not very
familiar (%)
1: Not at
all familiar (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 39.1 41.2 15.0 4.7 1096

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Very
familiar (%)
3: Somewhat
familiar (%)
2: Not very
familiar (%)
1: Not at
all familiar (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 3.0 35.2 39.8 17.0 8.0 324
..... Male 3.2 40.8 41.8 14.1 3.2 772

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Very
familiar (%)
3: Somewhat
familiar (%)
2: Not very
familiar (%)
1: Not at
all familiar (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 3.2 41.7 43.8 6.3 8.3 48
..... Asian 3.1 32.6 52.3 9.3 5.8 86
..... Hispanic 2.9 25.0 50.0 12.5 12.5 24
..... White 3.2 40.1 39.8 15.9 4.2 935

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
Citizenship Status* Mean Rating 4: Very
familiar (%)
3: Somewhat
familiar (%)
2: Not very
familiar (%)
1: Not at
all familiar (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 3.2 40.5 39.9 15.6 4.0 917
.... Resident Alien 3.1 36.4 46.4 10.0 7.1 140
..... NonRes Alien 2.8 17.9 53.8 17.9 10.3 39

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
Age* Mean Rating 4: Very
familiar (%)
3: Somewhat
familiar (%)
2: Not very
familiar (%)
1: Not at
all familiar (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.9 24.9 48.4 19.9 6.8 221
..... 40 to 55 3.1 38.3 40.9 15.5 5.3 530
..... 56 and over 3.3 49.6 37.1 11.0 2.3 345

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Very
familiar (%)
3: Somewhat
familiar (%)
2: Not very
familiar (%)
1: Not at
all familiar (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.9 27.2 43.2 20.4 9.3 324
.... 7-15 3.2 38.0 44.0 13.3 4.7 300
..... 16-25 3.3 46.2 38.3 13.4 2.1 290
...... 26 or more 3.4 51.1 37.9 10.4 0.5 182
Back to top


D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.2 4.5 28.4 49.5 17.6 1100

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
GenderMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.2 4.3 26.8 48.6 20.3 325
..... Male 2.2 4.6 29.0 49.8 16.5 775

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.2 4.0 36.0 38.0 22.0 50
..... Asian 2.0 1.2 18.6 59.3 20.9 86
..... Hispanic 2.0 . 29.2 45.8 25.0 24
..... White 2.2 5.0 28.9 49.1 17.0 937

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.2 4.9 29.5 48.3 17.3 921
.... Resident Alien 2.1 3.5 22.7 56.0 17.7 141
..... NonRes Alien 1.9 . 21.1 52.6 26.3 38

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
Age* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 1.9 0.9 19.6 53.0 26.5 219
..... 40 to 55 2.2 4.7 28.8 49.7 16.8 531
..... 56 and over 2.3 6.6 33.1 46.9 13.4 350

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.0 1.6 19.0 54.8 24.6 321
.... 7-15 2.2 4.3 28.8 51.7 15.2 302
..... 16-25 2.3 5.8 32.6 47.4 14.1 291
...... 26 or more 2.4 8.1 37.1 39.8 15.1 186
Back to top


D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.2 3.6 28.4 53.7 14.3 1101

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
GenderMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.1 2.8 24.0 57.2 16.0 325
..... Male 2.2 4.0 30.3 52.2 13.5 776

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
Race/Ethnicity* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.3 4.0 30.0 54.0 12.0 50
..... Asian 2.0 1.1 13.8 67.8 17.2 87
..... Hispanic 2.0 . 25.0 45.8 29.2 24
..... White 2.2 3.9 29.9 52.4 13.8 937

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
Citizenship Status* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.2 3.8 30.3 51.8 14.1 921
.... Resident Alien 2.1 3.5 20.4 60.6 15.5 142
..... NonRes Alien 2.0 . 13.2 73.7 13.2 38

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
Age* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.0 0.9 20.2 56.4 22.5 218
..... 40 to 55 2.2 3.8 28.9 54.6 12.8 533
..... 56 and over 2.3 5.1 32.9 50.6 11.4 350

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.0 0.9 22.1 56.4 20.6 321
.... 7-15 2.2 3.6 26.7 56.4 13.2 303
..... 16-25 2.3 4.8 32.6 51.9 10.7 291
...... 26 or more 2.4 6.5 35.5 47.3 10.8 186
Back to top


D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 11.5 38.1 41.1 9.3 1102

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
GenderMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.5 10.2 36.0 43.1 10.8 325
..... Male 2.5 12.1 39.0 40.3 8.6 777

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
Race/Ethnicity* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.5 12.2 30.6 51.0 6.1 49
..... Asian 2.3 3.4 32.2 58.6 5.7 87
..... Hispanic 2.2 8.3 25.0 45.8 20.8 24
..... White 2.5 12.4 39.4 38.8 9.5 939

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.5 12.0 38.4 40.5 9.1 922
.... Resident Alien 2.5 10.6 37.3 41.5 10.6 142
..... NonRes Alien 2.3 2.6 34.2 55.3 7.9 38

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
Age* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.3 5.0 36.4 46.8 11.8 220
..... 40 to 55 2.5 11.8 37.0 42.5 8.6 532
..... 56 and over 2.6 15.1 40.9 35.4 8.6 350

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.4 7.1 36.2 44.3 12.4 323
.... 7-15 2.5 11.6 34.7 44.9 8.9 303
..... 16-25 2.6 13.1 40.7 39.7 6.6 290
...... 26 or more 2.7 16.7 43.0 31.7 8.6 186
Back to top


D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 27.0 42.8 23.7 6.5 1101

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
GenderMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.8 22.8 42.9 25.3 9.0 324
..... Male 2.9 28.7 42.7 23.0 5.5 777

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
Race/Ethnicity* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.7 21.6 39.2 29.4 9.8 51
..... Asian 2.7 11.5 52.9 32.2 3.4 87
..... Hispanic 2.4 12.5 37.5 29.2 20.8 24
..... White 2.9 29.0 42.3 22.4 6.3 936

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.9 28.1 41.7 23.6 6.6 921
.... Resident Alien 2.9 23.8 46.2 23.8 6.3 143
..... NonRes Alien 2.7 10.8 56.8 27.0 5.4 37

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
Age* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.7 15.5 52.7 22.3 9.5 220
..... 40 to 55 2.9 25.3 42.0 26.6 6.0 533
..... 56 and over 3.1 36.8 37.6 20.1 5.5 348

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.7 17.6 45.5 28.8 8.0 323
.... 7-15 2.9 25.0 43.8 23.0 8.2 304
..... 16-25 3.0 34.3 39.1 22.5 4.2 289
...... 26 or more 3.1 35.1 42.2 17.8 4.9 185
Back to top


D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 13.6 48.3 29.7 8.4 1088

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.6 9.1 47.2 33.4 10.3 320
..... Male 2.7 15.5 48.8 28.1 7.6 768

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.5 13.7 35.3 41.2 9.8 51
..... Asian 2.6 8.0 52.9 33.3 5.7 87
..... Hispanic 2.3 . 37.5 50.0 12.5 24
..... White 2.7 14.5 49.0 28.1 8.5 923

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.7 14.3 47.4 29.2 9.1 910
.... Resident Alien 2.7 10.7 53.6 30.0 5.7 140
..... NonRes Alien 2.7 7.9 52.6 39.5 . 38

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.6 9.2 50.0 31.7 9.2 218
..... 40 to 55 2.7 13.9 46.5 30.7 8.9 527
..... 56 and over 2.8 16.0 50.1 26.8 7.0 343

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.6 10.1 50.0 31.3 8.5 316
.... 7-15 2.7 15.2 44.0 31.5 9.3 302
..... 16-25 2.7 15.3 50.3 27.8 6.6 288
...... 26 or more 2.7 14.3 49.5 26.9 9.3 182
Back to top


D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 45.2 40.8 10.2 3.8 1096

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 3.2 42.9 38.3 13.3 5.6 324
..... Male 3.3 46.1 41.8 8.9 3.1 772

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 3.1 37.3 45.1 9.8 7.8 51
..... Asian 3.1 35.6 47.1 13.8 3.4 87
..... Hispanic 3.1 37.5 37.5 20.8 4.2 24
..... White 3.3 46.7 40.1 9.6 3.7 931

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 3.3 45.6 40.2 10.1 4.0 917
.... Resident Alien 3.3 45.7 38.6 12.9 2.9 140
..... NonRes Alien 3.3 33.3 61.5 2.6 2.6 39

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 3.2 39.4 43.9 11.8 5.0 221
..... 40 to 55 3.3 43.7 42.0 10.2 4.1 531
..... 56 and over 3.4 51.2 36.9 9.3 2.6 344

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
Number of years employed at NCSU* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 3.2 38.4 47.7 9.3 4.6 323
.... 7-15 3.3 47.5 36.6 11.6 4.3 303
..... 16-25 3.2 42.7 42.3 10.8 4.2 286
...... 26 or more 3.5 57.1 33.2 8.7 1.1 184
Back to top


D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 38.9 38.3 14.9 7.9 1077

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Female 2.9 34.6 36.5 18.1 10.8 315
..... Male 3.1 40.7 39.0 13.6 6.7 762

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... African American 2.9 35.3 37.3 13.7 13.7 51
..... Asian 3.0 34.5 42.9 9.5 13.1 84
..... Hispanic 2.9 29.2 41.7 20.8 8.3 24
..... White 3.1 39.8 37.7 15.4 7.1 915

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... US Citizen 3.1 39.4 36.6 16.1 7.9 900
.... Resident Alien 3.1 36.4 45.0 9.3 9.3 140
..... NonRes Alien 3.2 35.1 54.1 8.1 2.7 37

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
AgeMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... 39 and under 3.1 42.8 35.3 15.8 6.0 215
..... 40 to 55 3.0 35.2 40.8 14.8 9.2 522
..... 56 and over 3.1 42.1 36.2 14.7 7.1 340

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 3.1 40.0 35.3 15.6 9.1 320
.... 7-15 3.1 36.6 41.4 13.6 8.5 295
..... 16-25 3.1 36.4 41.0 14.8 7.8 283
...... 26 or more 3.2 44.7 34.1 16.2 5.0 179
Back to top


D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 15.1 48.6 26.6 9.8 974

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
GenderMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Female 2.7 14.7 49.1 28.3 7.9 279
..... Male 2.7 15.3 48.3 25.9 10.5 695

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... African American 2.9 21.3 53.2 17.0 8.5 47
..... Asian 2.8 18.6 50.0 24.3 7.1 70
..... Hispanic 2.7 20.0 45.0 15.0 20.0 20
..... White 2.7 14.4 48.3 27.6 9.7 834

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.7 15.4 47.3 27.6 9.8 819
.... Resident Alien 2.7 15.0 53.3 21.7 10.0 120
..... NonRes Alien 2.7 8.6 62.9 20.0 8.6 35

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
AgeMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.8 19.5 48.4 25.3 6.8 190
..... 40 to 55 2.7 13.3 49.6 26.6 10.6 482
..... 56 and over 2.7 15.2 47.0 27.5 10.3 302

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.8 16.1 51.6 24.6 7.7 285
.... 7-15 2.6 12.7 51.0 24.3 12.0 259
..... 16-25 2.7 14.5 47.2 29.4 8.9 269
...... 26 or more 2.7 18.0 41.6 29.2 11.2 161
Back to top


D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 8.7 44.3 33.5 13.6 759

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
GenderMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Female 2.5 8.8 43.4 34.6 13.2 205
..... Male 2.5 8.7 44.6 33.0 13.7 554

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... African American 2.7 9.8 56.1 26.8 7.3 41
..... Asian 2.6 11.3 50.9 20.8 17.0 53
..... Hispanic 2.3 18.8 18.8 31.3 31.3 16
..... White 2.5 8.2 43.6 35.1 13.1 647

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.5 8.7 43.4 34.9 13.0 645
.... Resident Alien 2.4 7.8 47.8 24.4 20.0 90
..... NonRes Alien 2.8 12.5 54.2 29.2 4.2 24

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
AgeMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.7 11.6 47.9 34.2 6.2 146
..... 40 to 55 2.4 7.3 42.9 33.7 16.0 368
..... 56 and over 2.5 9.0 44.1 32.7 14.3 245

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.5 8.8 45.9 35.6 9.8 205
.... 7-15 2.5 7.8 45.6 31.6 15.0 206
..... 16-25 2.4 8.7 41.6 33.8 16.0 219
...... 26 or more 2.5 10.1 44.2 32.6 13.2 129
Back to top


D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 5.9 43.8 38.4 11.9 730

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
GenderMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Female 2.4 4.6 44.1 39.5 11.8 195
..... Male 2.4 6.4 43.7 37.9 12.0 535

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... African American 2.4 5.4 40.5 45.9 8.1 37
..... Asian 2.6 12.5 48.2 26.8 12.5 56
..... Hispanic 2.3 12.5 31.3 25.0 31.3 16
..... White 2.4 5.2 44.0 39.4 11.5 620

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.4 5.3 43.5 39.6 11.6 623
.... Resident Alien 2.4 8.0 43.7 33.3 14.9 87
..... NonRes Alien 2.8 15.0 55.0 20.0 10.0 20

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
Age* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.7 9.4 52.0 33.9 4.7 127
..... 40 to 55 2.4 4.5 42.0 39.5 14.0 357
..... 56 and over 2.4 6.1 42.3 39.0 12.6 246

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.5 7.4 47.9 34.0 10.6 188
.... 7-15 2.4 5.1 41.9 39.9 13.1 198
..... 16-25 2.4 3.7 43.1 40.8 12.4 218
...... 26 or more 2.5 8.7 42.1 38.1 11.1 126
Back to top


D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 7.9 53.1 25.0 14.1 725

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.7 10.1 62.2 18.6 9.0 188
..... Male 2.5 7.1 49.9 27.2 15.8 537

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.8 14.3 57.1 22.9 5.7 35
..... Asian 2.7 5.4 66.1 19.6 8.9 56
..... Hispanic 2.5 6.7 40.0 46.7 6.7 15
..... White 2.5 7.8 52.1 25.1 15.0 618

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.5 7.5 52.9 24.4 15.1 614
.... Resident Alien 2.7 10.9 56.5 23.9 8.7 92
..... NonRes Alien 2.5 5.3 42.1 47.4 5.3 19

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.8 9.2 65.3 19.4 6.1 98
..... 40 to 55 2.5 8.2 50.3 26.4 15.1 364
..... 56 and over 2.5 6.8 52.5 25.1 15.6 263

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.6 7.8 58.4 24.0 9.7 154
.... 7-15 2.6 9.8 53.1 23.2 13.9 194
..... 16-25 2.5 6.5 48.9 29.0 15.6 231
...... 26 or more 2.5 7.5 54.1 21.9 16.4 146
Back to top


D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 9.4 51.7 25.0 14.0 693

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
GenderMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.7 10.1 59.2 21.2 9.5 179
..... Male 2.5 9.1 49.0 26.3 15.6 514

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.7 12.9 51.6 25.8 9.7 31
..... Asian 2.7 7.7 65.4 15.4 11.5 52
..... Hispanic 2.4 7.1 42.9 35.7 14.3 14
..... White 2.6 9.4 50.8 25.5 14.3 595

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.6 9.2 51.5 24.7 14.5 586
.... Resident Alien 2.6 11.0 50.5 27.5 11.0 91
..... NonRes Alien 2.6 6.3 62.5 18.8 12.5 16

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.7 10.3 59.8 22.7 7.2 97
..... 40 to 55 2.5 7.9 51.9 26.4 13.8 341
..... 56 and over 2.5 11.0 48.2 23.9 16.9 255

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.6 7.5 60.3 21.2 11.0 146
.... 7-15 2.6 10.8 50.0 24.2 15.1 186
..... 16-25 2.5 9.3 48.6 28.2 13.9 216
...... 26 or more 2.5 9.7 49.7 24.8 15.9 145
Back to top


D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.3 6.1 39.6 32.5 21.8 671

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
GenderMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.3 5.7 40.8 33.3 20.1 174
..... Male 2.3 6.2 39.2 32.2 22.3 497

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.3 10.7 32.1 32.1 25.0 28
..... Asian 2.4 5.8 48.1 26.9 19.2 52
..... Hispanic 2.1 6.7 20.0 46.7 26.7 15
..... White 2.3 5.9 39.8 32.7 21.6 575

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.3 5.7 39.8 32.6 21.9 565
.... Resident Alien 2.3 9.0 37.1 32.6 21.3 89
..... NonRes Alien 2.4 5.9 47.1 29.4 17.6 17

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
AgeMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.5 6.5 48.9 29.3 15.2 92
..... 40 to 55 2.2 5.1 37.2 35.1 22.6 336
..... 56 and over 2.3 7.4 39.5 30.0 23.0 243

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.4 6.4 44.3 27.9 21.4 140
.... 7-15 2.2 6.6 33.7 35.9 23.8 181
..... 16-25 2.3 5.2 41.7 34.1 19.0 211
...... 26 or more 2.3 6.5 39.6 30.2 23.7 139
Back to top


D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures

  Mean Rating 4: Very
effective (%)
3: Somewhat
effective (%)
2: Not very
effective (%)
1: Not at
all effective (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 17.0 51.8 21.1 10.1 388

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Very
effective (%)
3: Somewhat
effective (%)
2: Not very
effective (%)
1: Not at
all effective (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 2.6 19.4 42.9 20.4 17.3 98
..... Male 2.8 16.2 54.8 21.4 7.6 290

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
Race/EthnicityMean Rating 4: Very
effective (%)
3: Somewhat
effective (%)
2: Not very
effective (%)
1: Not at
all effective (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 2.7 21.7 43.5 17.4 17.4 23
..... Asian 2.8 12.9 61.3 19.4 6.5 31
..... Hispanic 2.6 22.2 22.2 44.4 11.1 9
..... White 2.8 17.0 52.5 20.7 9.9 324

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Very
effective (%)
3: Somewhat
effective (%)
2: Not very
effective (%)
1: Not at
all effective (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 2.8 17.8 50.3 21.7 10.2 332
.... Resident Alien 2.8 14.6 60.4 16.7 8.3 48
..... NonRes Alien 2.5 . 62.5 25.0 12.5 8

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
AgeMean Rating 4: Very
effective (%)
3: Somewhat
effective (%)
2: Not very
effective (%)
1: Not at
all effective (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 2.8 19.1 53.2 14.9 12.8 47
..... 40 to 55 2.7 14.4 49.1 24.6 12.0 167
..... 56 and over 2.8 19.0 54.0 19.5 7.5 174

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Very
effective (%)
3: Somewhat
effective (%)
2: Not very
effective (%)
1: Not at
all effective (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 2.6 13.6 47.0 22.7 16.7 66
.... 7-15 2.7 15.0 53.0 23.0 9.0 100
..... 16-25 2.8 18.5 48.4 25.8 7.3 124
...... 26 or more 2.9 19.4 58.2 12.2 10.2 98
Back to top


D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 52.6 39.0 7.1 1.3 1087

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
Gender* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... Female 3.5 58.4 36.9 4.1 0.6 320
..... Male 3.4 50.2 39.9 8.3 1.6 767

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
Race/Ethnicity* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... African American 3.6 64.7 33.3 2.0 . 51
..... Asian 3.3 42.4 48.2 4.7 4.7 85
..... Hispanic 3.5 58.3 37.5 4.2 . 24
..... White 3.4 52.7 38.5 7.7 1.1 924

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
Citizenship StatusMean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
... US Citizen 3.4 53.1 38.2 7.7 1.1 914
.... Resident Alien 3.4 50.4 41.5 5.2 3.0 135
..... NonRes Alien 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 38

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
AgeMean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... 39 and under 3.5 53.9 41.5 4.1 0.5 217
..... 40 to 55 3.4 51.0 40.1 7.4 1.5 526
..... 56 and over 3.4 54.4 35.8 8.4 1.5 344

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
Number of years employed at NCSUMean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
... 6 or fewer 3.5 53.9 41.1 4.0 0.9 321
.... 7-15 3.4 53.7 38.3 6.4 1.7 298
..... 16-25 3.4 49.1 39.0 10.5 1.4 287
...... 26 or more 3.4 54.1 36.5 8.3 1.1 181
Back to top

Continue to Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism


View These Results by College

View These Results by Academic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section D: Faculty-Administrative Relationships results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page