NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section B: Image and Vision

Tables of Results
by Academic Profile


The following tables provide results to questions in Section B: Image and Vision, broken down by administrative experience, rank, and tenure status. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between groups (e.g., between tenure-track and non-tenure-track) are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section B: Image and Vision results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section B by College | Section B by Demographic Profile


A2: Ever held an administrative position

  ..... No (%) ..... Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 74.1 25.9 1132

A2: Ever held an administrative position
Rank* ..... No (%) ..... Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 96.2 3.8 235
..... Assoc Prof 78.3 21.7 300
..... Full Prof 56.0 44.0 461
..... Lecturer 88.2 11.8 136

A2: Ever held an administrative position
Tenure Track Status* ..... No (%) ..... Yes (%) Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 87.8 12.2 205
..... TT: Non-Tenured 98.9 1.1 189
..... TT: Tenured 64.0 36.0 738

A2: Ever held an administrative position
A2: Ever held an administrative position..... No (%) ..... Yes (%) Total(N)
..... No (%) 74.1 . 839
..... Yes (%) . 25.9 293
Back to top


B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 27.8 53.8 14.8 3.6 1105

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 28.9 52.2 15.8 3.1 228
..... Assoc Prof 3.1 24.6 60.3 11.8 3.4 297
..... Full Prof 3.1 32.2 48.5 15.2 4.2 454
..... Lecturer 2.9 17.5 61.1 18.3 3.2 126

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.0 18.4 62.1 16.8 2.6 190
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.1 29.7 51.4 15.7 3.2 185
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 29.7 52.3 14.0 4.0 730

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 25.2 54.6 16.4 3.8 815
..... Yes (%) 3.2 35.2 51.7 10.0 3.1 290
Back to top


B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 20.4 48.9 22.9 7.8 1099

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 24.7 48.1 19.5 7.8 231
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 18.0 46.9 26.2 8.8 294
..... Full Prof 2.9 21.7 50.7 22.1 5.6 448
..... Lecturer 2.6 13.5 48.4 24.6 13.5 126

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 14.1 52.9 22.5 10.5 191
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 26.2 43.3 20.9 9.6 187
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 20.5 49.2 23.6 6.7 721

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 18.8 48.0 24.4 8.7 812
..... Yes (%) 3.0 24.7 51.2 18.8 5.2 287
Back to top


B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 18.5 50.0 24.1 7.4 1075

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty
RankMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 17.0 50.5 25.2 7.3 218
..... Assoc Prof 2.8 16.2 51.1 24.3 8.5 284
..... Full Prof 2.9 22.3 49.8 21.4 6.5 448
..... Lecturer 2.6 12.8 47.2 31.2 8.8 125

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 12.4 50.3 28.6 8.6 185
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 18.8 48.3 25.6 7.4 176
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 20.0 50.3 22.5 7.1 714

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 16.7 49.6 25.9 7.9 789
..... Yes (%) 2.9 23.4 51.0 19.2 6.3 286
Back to top


B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.8 21.5 40.5 32.4 4.5 1.2 941

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ
RankMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.7 16.8 39.1 38.0 4.9 1.1 184
..... Assoc Prof 3.7 19.4 42.1 31.2 6.5 0.8 247
..... Full Prof 3.9 25.9 40.9 28.7 3.6 1.0 394
..... Lecturer 3.7 18.1 37.9 38.8 2.6 2.6 116

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.6 16.7 38.3 40.1 1.9 3.1 162
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.7 17.6 41.2 34.6 5.9 0.7 153
..... TT: Tenured 3.8 23.6 40.9 29.9 4.8 0.8 626

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.7 19.0 41.0 34.5 4.4 1.2 686
..... Yes (%) 3.9 28.2 39.2 26.7 4.7 1.2 255
Back to top


B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 19.8 41.8 29.4 7.7 1.4 1005

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education
Rank* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.6 14.4 41.8 33.7 8.7 1.4 208
..... Assoc Prof 3.7 20.5 38.4 32.5 7.5 1.1 268
..... Full Prof 3.8 23.5 44.3 24.4 6.6 1.1 438
..... Lecturer 3.5 12.1 39.6 34.1 11.0 3.3 91

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.6 15.4 41.3 32.2 8.4 2.8 143
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.6 13.1 41.5 34.1 10.2 1.1 176
..... TT: Tenured 3.8 22.4 42.0 27.6 6.9 1.2 686

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.7 18.7 40.3 31.0 8.5 1.5 739
..... Yes (%) 3.8 22.9 45.9 24.8 5.3 1.1 266
Back to top


B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 20.6 41.3 30.8 6.3 0.9 1077

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity
Rank* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.7 21.4 41.5 28.1 6.7 2.2 224
..... Assoc Prof 3.7 17.6 39.7 36.2 6.6 . 290
..... Full Prof 3.9 23.8 44.3 26.4 4.8 0.7 454
..... Lecturer 3.5 13.8 33.0 40.4 11.0 1.8 109

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.6 20.7 32.0 36.1 8.3 3.0 169
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.7 16.7 45.2 29.6 7.5 1.1 186
..... TT: Tenured 3.8 21.6 42.5 29.9 5.5 0.4 722

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.7 20.1 41.0 31.0 7.2 0.8 791
..... Yes (%) 3.8 22.0 42.3 30.4 3.8 1.4 286
Back to top


B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 10.4 33.4 35.7 16.7 3.8 395

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature
RankMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.3 7.5 35.0 38.8 15.0 3.8 80
..... Assoc Prof 3.3 9.1 35.4 35.4 17.2 3.0 99
..... Full Prof 3.3 13.9 32.1 32.8 16.8 4.4 137
..... Lecturer 3.2 8.9 31.6 38.0 17.7 3.8 79

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.2 7.3 34.5 35.5 19.1 3.6 110
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.3 11.1 30.2 39.7 15.9 3.2 63
..... TT: Tenured 3.3 11.7 33.8 34.7 15.8 4.1 222

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.3 9.6 32.9 35.6 17.8 4.1 292
..... Yes (%) 3.4 12.6 35.0 35.9 13.6 2.9 103
Back to top


B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 9.5 39.6 37.6 11.4 2.0 713

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation
RankMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.4 8.4 38.9 37.4 13.7 1.5 131
..... Assoc Prof 3.5 8.8 43.6 36.5 8.8 2.2 181
..... Full Prof 3.4 10.7 38.4 37.5 11.1 2.3 307
..... Lecturer 3.4 8.5 36.2 40.4 13.8 1.1 94

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.3 7.5 37.6 39.1 12.8 3.0 133
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.4 9.0 36.0 39.6 15.3 . 111
..... TT: Tenured 3.5 10.2 40.9 36.7 10.0 2.1 469

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.4 9.2 38.2 38.2 12.4 1.9 531
..... Yes (%) 3.5 10.4 43.4 35.7 8.2 2.2 182
Back to top


B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 23.0 37.4 32.1 6.1 1.4 931

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement
Rank* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.8 23.0 41.9 26.7 5.8 2.6 191
..... Assoc Prof 3.8 25.9 34.8 33.2 4.9 1.2 247
..... Full Prof 3.8 25.3 36.9 30.9 5.9 1.0 388
..... Lecturer 3.4 7.6 37.1 43.8 10.5 1.0 105

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.6 14.7 38.5 37.2 9.0 0.6 156
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.8 21.3 44.4 25.6 5.6 3.1 160
..... TT: Tenured 3.8 25.5 35.3 32.5 5.5 1.1 615

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.8 23.2 37.4 32.2 5.9 1.3 695
..... Yes (%) 3.7 22.5 37.3 31.8 6.8 1.7 236
Back to top


B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 10.9 36.3 38.7 10.6 3.5 746

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development
RankMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.5 12.0 38.3 39.1 9.8 0.8 133
..... Assoc Prof 3.3 8.3 33.2 44.0 11.9 2.6 193
..... Full Prof 3.5 12.3 38.7 35.8 8.6 4.6 349
..... Lecturer 3.2 8.5 29.6 38.0 18.3 5.6 71

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.3 8.3 37.6 33.0 17.4 3.7 109
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.5 12.3 33.3 44.7 8.8 0.9 114
..... TT: Tenured 3.4 11.1 36.7 38.6 9.6 4.0 523

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.4 11.7 35.5 39.4 10.8 2.6 538
..... Yes (%) 3.3 8.7 38.5 37.0 10.1 5.8 208
Back to top


B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.0 20.2 61.5 15.2 2.3 0.7 945

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands
RankMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 4.1 26.8 59.2 11.7 1.7 0.6 179
..... Assoc Prof 3.9 16.9 63.0 16.1 2.8 1.2 254
..... Full Prof 3.9 19.0 59.1 18.5 2.7 0.7 401
..... Lecturer 4.1 21.6 70.3 7.2 0.9 . 111

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 4.2 26.6 64.9 6.5 1.3 0.6 154
..... TT: Non-Tenured 4.1 23.8 60.9 13.2 2.0 . 151
..... TT: Tenured 3.9 17.8 60.8 17.8 2.7 0.9 640

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 4.0 19.6 60.8 16.3 2.3 1.0 688
..... Yes (%) 4.0 21.8 63.4 12.5 2.3 . 257
Back to top


B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.1 30.5 55.9 11.8 1.3 0.5 1035

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands
RankMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 4.1 26.5 57.2 14.4 1.4 0.5 215
..... Assoc Prof 4.1 27.0 60.1 10.3 1.8 0.7 281
..... Full Prof 4.2 32.3 54.1 12.2 0.9 0.4 449
..... Lecturer 4.3 42.2 48.9 7.8 1.1 . 90

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 4.3 40.1 50.3 7.5 1.4 0.7 147
..... TT: Non-Tenured 4.1 24.4 58.3 16.1 1.1 . 180
..... TT: Tenured 4.1 30.1 56.5 11.6 1.3 0.6 708

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 4.1 29.2 56.6 12.2 1.6 0.4 760
..... Yes (%) 4.2 34.2 54.2 10.5 0.4 0.7 275
Back to top


B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.4 48.2 43.3 8.0 0.5 0.1 1119

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty
RankMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 4.4 51.3 37.5 10.8 0.4 . 232
..... Assoc Prof 4.4 48.8 42.8 7.4 0.7 0.3 297
..... Full Prof 4.4 46.3 45.4 7.6 0.7 . 458
..... Lecturer 4.4 47.7 47.0 5.3 . . 132

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 4.4 48.0 45.5 6.6 . . 198
..... TT: Non-Tenured 4.4 49.5 39.4 10.6 0.5 . 188
..... TT: Tenured 4.4 47.9 43.7 7.6 0.7 0.1 733

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 4.4 46.3 44.9 8.2 0.5 0.1 827
..... Yes (%) 4.4 53.4 38.7 7.2 0.7 . 292
Back to top


B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.3 42.1 46.7 10.0 1.2 0.1 1115

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty
RankMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 4.3 45.3 42.2 11.2 1.3 . 232
..... Assoc Prof 4.3 39.7 49.2 10.1 0.7 0.3 297
..... Full Prof 4.3 41.7 47.1 9.4 1.8 . 456
..... Lecturer 4.3 43.1 47.7 9.2 . . 130

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 4.3 44.2 45.7 10.2 . . 197
..... TT: Non-Tenured 4.3 45.7 42.0 10.6 1.6 . 188
..... TT: Tenured 4.3 40.5 48.2 9.7 1.4 0.1 730

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 4.3 41.0 47.5 10.2 1.2 0.1 824
..... Yes (%) 4.3 45.0 44.7 9.3 1.0 . 291
Back to top


B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.5 51.8 44.4 3.5 0.1 0.2 1114

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability
Rank* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 4.4 43.2 49.8 7.0 . . 229
..... Assoc Prof 4.4 44.4 51.2 4.4 . . 297
..... Full Prof 4.6 60.4 38.0 0.9 0.2 0.4 455
..... Lecturer 4.5 53.4 42.1 4.5 . . 133

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 4.4 49.0 45.5 5.6 . . 198
..... TT: Non-Tenured 4.4 44.1 48.9 7.0 . . 186
..... TT: Tenured 4.5 54.5 43.0 2.1 0.1 0.3 730

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 4.4 49.9 45.1 4.6 0.1 0.2 824
..... Yes (%) 4.6 57.2 42.4 0.3 . . 290
Back to top


B3f: Grade own professional achievement

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.4 46.9 46.3 6.3 0.4 0.2 1115

B3f: Grade own professional achievement
Rank* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 4.3 37.0 52.6 10.4 . . 230
..... Assoc Prof 4.3 37.4 54.5 7.4 0.7 . 297
..... Full Prof 4.6 59.6 38.2 1.8 . 0.4 455
..... Lecturer 4.3 42.1 44.4 12.0 1.5 . 133

B3f: Grade own professional achievement
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 4.2 38.2 48.7 12.1 1.0 . 199
..... TT: Non-Tenured 4.3 39.2 51.1 9.7 . . 186
..... TT: Tenured 4.5 51.2 44.4 3.8 0.3 0.3 730

B3f: Grade own professional achievement
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 4.4 44.6 47.3 7.4 0.5 0.2 825
..... Yes (%) 4.5 53.4 43.4 3.1 . . 290
Back to top


B4: Department's vision for the future

  Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 32.0 37.6 25.8 4.5 1121

B4: Department's vision for the future
Rank* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 33.3 33.3 24.2 9.1 231
..... Assoc Prof 29.6 39.4 27.6 3.4 297
..... Full Prof 36.0 37.3 25.8 0.9 458
..... Lecturer 21.5 42.2 24.4 11.9 135

B4: Department's vision for the future
Tenure Track Status* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 25.1 42.4 20.7 11.8 203
..... TT: Non-Tenured 32.3 32.8 28.0 7.0 186
..... TT: Tenured 33.9 37.6 26.6 1.9 732

B4: Department's vision for the future
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 29.9 36.4 27.6 6.0 829
..... Yes (%) 38.0 41.1 20.5 0.3 292
Back to top


B5: Agreement with department vision for future

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 35.4 59.2 4.7 0.6 773

B5: Agreement with department vision for future
RankMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.3 36.6 58.8 3.9 0.7 153
..... Assoc Prof 3.2 31.0 62.1 5.9 1.0 203
..... Full Prof 3.4 41.0 54.8 3.9 0.3 332
..... Lecturer 3.1 22.4 70.6 5.9 1.2 85

B5: Agreement with department vision for future
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.2 22.8 71.3 5.1 0.7 136
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.3 39.2 55.8 4.2 0.8 120
..... TT: Tenured 3.3 37.9 56.9 4.6 0.6 517

B5: Agreement with department vision for future
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.2 29.6 64.5 5.0 0.9 544
..... Yes (%) 3.5 49.3 46.7 3.9 . 229
Back to top


B6: College's vision for the future

  Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 22.4 35.8 23.5 18.3 1120

B6: College's vision for the future
Rank* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 26.3 29.7 18.5 25.4 232
..... Assoc Prof 18.5 40.9 21.8 18.8 298
..... Full Prof 22.5 35.7 29.1 12.7 457
..... Lecturer 24.1 35.3 16.5 24.1 133

B6: College's vision for the future
Tenure Track Status* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 24.9 35.8 14.4 24.9 201
..... TT: Non-Tenured 24.1 28.3 21.4 26.2 187
..... TT: Tenured 21.3 37.7 26.5 14.5 732

B6: College's vision for the future
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... No (%) 22.6 33.2 23.3 21.0 829
..... Yes (%) 22.0 43.3 24.1 10.7 291
Back to top


B7a: Department change in next five years

  Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 56.4 14.7 28.8 1120

B7a: Department change in next five years
Rank* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 67.2 6.5 26.3 232
..... Assoc Prof 56.6 15.5 27.9 297
..... Full Prof 52.9 18.4 28.7 456
..... Lecturer 49.6 14.8 35.6 135

B7a: Department change in next five years
Tenure Track Status* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 52.7 10.8 36.5 203
..... TT: Non-Tenured 70.6 7.0 22.5 187
..... TT: Tenured 53.8 17.8 28.4 730

B7a: Department change in next five years
A2: Ever held an administrative position Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 56.2 14.6 29.2 829
..... Yes (%) 57.0 15.1 27.8 291
Back to top


B7b: College change in next five years

  Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 45.0 12.7 42.3 1109

B7b: College change in next five years
Rank* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 55.3 4.8 39.9 228
..... Assoc Prof 40.1 15.0 44.9 294
..... Full Prof 40.6 17.0 42.4 453
..... Lecturer 53.0 6.7 40.3 134

B7b: College change in next five years
Tenure Track Status* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 54.5 6.1 39.4 198
..... TT: Non-Tenured 54.5 5.3 40.1 187
..... TT: Tenured 39.9 16.4 43.6 724

B7b: College change in next five years
A2: Ever held an administrative position Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 45.3 11.6 43.1 821
..... Yes (%) 44.1 16.0 39.9 288
Back to top


B7c: NC State change in next five years

  Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 42.0 11.1 46.8 1113

B7c: NC State change in next five years
Rank* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 53.5 2.6 43.9 230
..... Assoc Prof 33.6 13.6 52.9 295
..... Full Prof 38.1 15.4 46.5 454
..... Lecturer 54.5 6.0 39.6 134

B7c: NC State change in next five years
Tenure Track Status* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 53.0 4.5 42.5 200
..... TT: Non-Tenured 52.4 2.7 44.9 187
..... TT: Tenured 36.4 15.2 48.5 726

B7c: NC State change in next five years
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... No (%) 42.7 9.6 47.8 825
..... Yes (%) 40.3 15.6 44.1 288
Back to top

Continue to Section C: Leadership


View These Results by College

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section B: Image and Vision results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page