NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section B: Image and Vision

Tables of Results
by College


The following tables provide results to questions in Section B: Image and Vision, broken down by college. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between colleges are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section B: Image and Vision results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section B by Academic Profile | Section B by Demographic Profile


A2: Ever held an administrative position

  ..... No (%) ..... Yes (%) Total(N)
Total(N) 74.1 25.9 1132

A2: Ever held an administrative position
College of appointment* ..... No (%) ..... Yes (%) Total(N)
..... CALS 75.8 24.2 281
..... CED 73.1 26.9 52
..... CHASS 70.6 29.4 231
..... CNR 83.6 16.4 61
..... COE 73.2 26.8 164
..... COM 75.0 25.0 56
..... COT 72.4 27.6 29
..... CVM 78.7 21.3 75
..... Design 40.7 59.3 27
..... FYC 62.5 37.5 8
..... PAMS 76.3 23.7 118
..... Student Affairs 86.7 13.3 30
Back to top


B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 27.8 53.8 14.8 3.6 1105

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty
College of appointment Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.2 34.4 49.6 13.4 2.5 276
..... CED 3.0 15.7 68.6 11.8 3.9 51
..... CHASS 3.0 24.4 56.1 15.8 3.6 221
..... CNR 3.0 24.6 54.1 18.0 3.3 61
..... COE 3.0 23.9 56.0 17.0 3.1 159
..... COM 2.9 23.6 54.5 14.5 7.3 55
..... COT 3.1 32.1 53.6 10.7 3.6 28
..... CVM 3.1 31.1 47.3 20.3 1.4 74
..... Design 2.9 18.5 59.3 11.1 11.1 27
..... FYC 3.1 37.5 37.5 25.0 . 8
..... PAMS 3.2 33.0 54.8 8.7 3.5 115
..... Student Affairs 2.8 20.0 50.0 20.0 10.0 30
Back to top


B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 20.4 48.9 22.9 7.8 1099

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 27.2 48.2 20.3 4.3 276
..... CED 2.8 19.6 54.9 15.7 9.8 51
..... CHASS 2.6 16.2 45.5 25.2 13.1 222
..... CNR 2.9 20.7 55.2 17.2 6.9 58
..... COE 2.7 16.0 50.0 25.6 8.3 156
..... COM 2.6 11.1 46.3 33.3 9.3 54
..... COT 2.6 10.3 48.3 31.0 10.3 29
..... CVM 3.0 24.3 52.7 20.3 2.7 74
..... Design 2.7 22.2 37.0 25.9 14.8 27
..... FYC 3.0 25.0 62.5 . 12.5 8
..... PAMS 2.9 25.2 47.8 23.5 3.5 115
..... Student Affairs 2.6 6.9 58.6 20.7 13.8 29
Back to top


B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 18.5 50.0 24.1 7.4 1075

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 26.5 51.9 17.5 4.1 268
..... CED 2.7 14.0 54.0 24.0 8.0 50
..... CHASS 2.5 13.5 38.1 37.2 11.2 215
..... CNR 2.9 20.3 55.9 16.9 6.8 59
..... COE 2.9 20.1 51.9 24.0 3.9 154
..... COM 2.8 13.2 60.4 15.1 11.3 53
..... COT 3.0 28.6 50.0 17.9 3.6 28
..... CVM 2.6 8.1 51.4 31.1 9.5 74
..... Design 2.8 19.2 53.8 15.4 11.5 26
..... FYC 2.8 12.5 62.5 12.5 12.5 8
..... PAMS 2.7 15.5 51.8 22.7 10.0 110
..... Student Affairs 2.8 16.7 53.3 23.3 6.7 30
Back to top


B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.8 21.5 40.5 32.4 4.5 1.2 941

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ
College of appointment* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.9 28.6 38.0 26.5 5.6 1.3 234
..... CED 3.6 21.2 30.3 39.4 9.1 . 33
..... CHASS 3.5 13.0 32.3 48.4 4.7 1.6 192
..... CNR 4.1 33.9 44.1 16.9 5.1 . 59
..... COE 3.7 15.0 49.4 31.3 3.1 1.3 160
..... COM 3.3 3.8 39.6 45.3 9.4 1.9 53
..... COT 4.3 48.3 41.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 29
..... CVM 4.2 30.8 53.8 15.4 . . 13
..... Design 4.0 24.0 56.0 16.0 4.0 . 25
..... FYC 4.4 57.1 28.6 14.3 . . 7
..... PAMS 3.8 20.5 44.6 33.0 1.8 . 112
..... Student Affairs 3.8 25.0 37.5 33.3 . 4.2 24
Back to top


B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 19.8 41.8 29.4 7.7 1.4 1005

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education
College of appointment* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 4.1 39.2 38.8 16.4 4.5 1.1 268
..... CED 3.5 9.6 40.4 44.2 5.8 . 52
..... CHASS 3.3 4.7 40.6 38.2 14.1 2.4 170
..... CNR 3.8 16.9 61.0 10.2 10.2 1.7 59
..... COE 3.7 12.4 47.8 34.2 5.0 0.6 161
..... COM 3.5 5.6 44.4 40.7 9.3 . 54
..... COT 4.0 41.4 34.5 13.8 6.9 3.4 29
..... CVM 3.6 22.5 31.0 31.0 15.5 . 71
..... Design 3.6 27.3 31.8 27.3 4.5 9.1 22
..... FYC 3.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 . 2
..... PAMS 3.6 12.3 41.2 42.1 3.5 0.9 114
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 66.7 . . 33.3 3
Back to top


B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 20.6 41.3 30.8 6.3 0.9 1077

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity
College of appointment* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 4.2 42.8 37.0 16.7 3.3 0.4 276
..... CED 3.5 9.6 34.6 48.1 7.7 . 52
..... CHASS 3.4 9.1 33.0 45.9 11.0 1.0 209
..... CNR 3.9 18.3 55.0 20.0 6.7 . 60
..... COE 3.7 13.1 50.6 30.6 4.4 1.3 160
..... COM 3.2 1.8 27.3 56.4 14.5 . 55
..... COT 4.0 31.0 44.8 17.2 6.9 . 29
..... CVM 4.1 28.4 48.6 23.0 . . 74
..... Design 3.3 3.8 38.5 46.2 3.8 7.7 26
..... FYC 2.3 . 16.7 16.7 50.0 16.7 6
..... PAMS 3.8 13.8 57.8 25.9 2.6 . 116
..... Student Affairs 2.4 . . 57.1 28.6 14.3 14
Back to top


B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 10.4 33.4 35.7 16.7 3.8 395

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature
College of appointment* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 17.2 42.5 26.4 12.6 1.1 87
..... CED 3.0 . 25.0 50.0 25.0 . 20
..... CHASS 3.4 11.0 39.0 33.9 13.6 2.5 118
..... CNR 2.8 . 26.1 34.8 30.4 8.7 23
..... COE 3.1 6.3 22.9 47.9 20.8 2.1 48
..... COM 2.9 . 18.2 54.5 27.3 . 11
..... COT 2.5 . 20.0 20.0 46.7 13.3 15
..... CVM 3.0 7.7 23.1 46.2 7.7 15.4 13
..... Design 3.6 20.0 32.0 40.0 4.0 4.0 25
..... FYC 2.7 . 33.3 . 66.7 . 3
..... PAMS 3.6 15.8 42.1 31.6 5.3 5.3 19
..... Student Affairs 2.8 7.7 15.4 46.2 15.4 15.4 13
Back to top


B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 9.5 39.6 37.6 11.4 2.0 713

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation
College of appointment Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 13.4 40.3 38.2 7.5 0.5 186
..... CED 3.5 13.5 43.2 21.6 18.9 2.7 37
..... CHASS 3.2 5.8 33.0 39.8 17.5 3.9 103
..... CNR 3.4 6.7 42.2 35.6 13.3 2.2 45
..... COE 3.4 9.8 37.1 37.1 15.2 0.8 132
..... COM 3.6 12.5 45.0 32.5 5.0 5.0 40
..... COT 3.6 15.4 46.2 26.9 7.7 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.4 5.6 47.2 33.3 8.3 5.6 36
..... Design 3.1 . 33.3 50.0 12.5 4.2 24
..... FYC 2.8 . 16.7 50.0 33.3 . 6
..... PAMS 3.5 4.7 43.8 48.4 3.1 . 64
..... Student Affairs 3.5 14.3 35.7 35.7 14.3 . 14
Back to top


B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 23.0 37.4 32.1 6.1 1.4 931

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement
College of appointment* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 4.2 46.2 34.9 16.5 2.0 0.4 249
..... CED 3.6 10.4 43.8 41.7 4.2 . 48
..... CHASS 3.3 8.2 32.1 47.2 10.7 1.9 159
..... CNR 4.3 50.9 38.2 5.5 3.6 1.8 55
..... COE 3.4 9.2 38.3 41.8 8.5 2.1 141
..... COM 3.3 8.7 32.6 47.8 6.5 4.3 46
..... COT 4.1 40.7 40.7 11.1 7.4 . 27
..... CVM 3.8 24.6 41.0 27.9 3.3 3.3 61
..... Design 3.3 7.7 30.8 50.0 7.7 3.8 26
..... FYC 2.8 . . 75.0 25.0 . 4
..... PAMS 3.6 9.0 46.1 37.1 7.9 . 89
..... Student Affairs 3.5 . 53.8 38.5 7.7 . 26
Back to top


B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 10.9 36.3 38.7 10.6 3.5 746

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development
College of appointment* Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong (%)
3: Average (%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very
weak (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.8 18.5 47.7 28.8 4.5 0.5 222
..... CED 3.1 . 28.6 53.6 17.9 . 28
..... CHASS 2.8 1.1 21.3 46.1 21.3 10.1 89
..... CNR 3.8 22.6 45.3 20.8 7.5 3.8 53
..... COE 3.3 10.9 30.5 42.2 14.1 2.3 128
..... COM 3.2 2.3 34.1 47.7 11.4 4.5 44
..... COT 3.6 14.3 35.7 46.4 . 3.6 28
..... CVM 3.3 6.1 32.7 51.0 6.1 4.1 49
..... Design 2.7 4.3 13.0 43.5 26.1 13.0 23
..... FYC 3.5 . 50.0 50.0 . . 2
..... PAMS 3.4 5.9 38.2 45.6 7.4 2.9 68
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 33.3 25.0 33.3 8.3 12
Back to top


B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.0 20.2 61.5 15.2 2.3 0.7 945

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands
College of appointment* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 3.9 21.1 57.8 16.5 2.3 2.3 218
..... CED 4.3 41.2 50.0 8.8 . . 34
..... CHASS 4.0 15.6 67.0 16.5 0.9 . 218
..... CNR 3.8 15.0 63.3 15.0 3.3 3.3 60
..... COE 3.9 12.3 65.4 19.1 3.1 . 162
..... COM 3.9 1.9 83.3 13.0 1.9 . 54
..... COT 4.3 41.4 51.7 6.9 . . 29
..... CVM 3.9 13.3 66.7 13.3 6.7 . 15
..... Design 4.5 53.8 42.3 3.8 . . 26
..... FYC 4.7 66.7 33.3 . . . 6
..... PAMS 4.0 27.2 52.6 14.9 5.3 . 114
..... Student Affairs 4.4 44.4 55.6 . . . 9
Back to top


B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.1 30.5 55.9 11.8 1.3 0.5 1035

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands
College of appointment* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 4.2 39.5 48.3 9.6 1.5 1.1 271
..... CED 4.2 32.7 51.9 13.5 1.9 . 52
..... CHASS 4.2 31.6 56.7 10.7 0.5 0.5 187
..... CNR 4.2 35.0 50.0 13.3 1.7 . 60
..... COE 4.2 26.9 63.1 10.0 . . 160
..... COM 4.2 29.6 59.3 9.3 1.9 . 54
..... COT 4.1 24.1 58.6 17.2 . . 29
..... CVM 4.1 24.0 61.3 12.0 1.3 1.3 75
..... Design 4.0 29.6 40.7 25.9 3.7 . 27
..... FYC 3.5 . 50.0 50.0 . . 2
..... PAMS 3.9 15.5 66.4 15.5 2.6 . 116
..... Student Affairs 5.0 100.0 . . . . 2
Back to top


B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.4 48.2 43.3 8.0 0.5 0.1 1119

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty
College of appointment* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 4.5 57.9 35.3 6.5 0.4 . 278
..... CED 4.3 42.3 46.2 11.5 . . 52
..... CHASS 4.4 48.0 42.7 8.4 0.9 . 227
..... CNR 4.2 42.6 42.6 13.1 . 1.6 61
..... COE 4.3 36.6 54.0 8.7 0.6 . 161
..... COM 4.1 25.5 61.8 10.9 1.8 . 55
..... COT 4.3 41.4 44.8 13.8 . . 29
..... CVM 4.6 60.0 38.7 1.3 . . 75
..... Design 4.4 48.1 44.4 7.4 . . 27
..... FYC 4.5 62.5 25.0 12.5 . . 8
..... PAMS 4.4 51.3 41.0 6.8 0.9 . 117
..... Student Affairs 4.4 44.8 48.3 6.9 . . 29
Back to top


B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.3 42.1 46.7 10.0 1.2 0.1 1115

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty
College of appointment* Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 4.4 51.8 40.6 6.5 1.1 . 276
..... CED 4.2 34.6 51.9 13.5 . . 52
..... CHASS 4.2 39.4 46.0 13.3 1.3 . 226
..... CNR 4.1 32.8 50.8 11.5 3.3 1.6 61
..... COE 4.2 31.3 57.5 10.0 1.3 . 160
..... COM 4.0 23.6 52.7 21.8 1.8 . 55
..... COT 4.2 27.6 62.1 10.3 . . 29
..... CVM 4.6 62.7 36.0 1.3 . . 75
..... Design 4.2 37.0 48.1 11.1 3.7 . 27
..... FYC 4.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 . . 8
..... PAMS 4.5 52.1 41.9 5.1 0.9 . 117
..... Student Affairs 4.1 27.6 51.7 20.7 . . 29
Back to top


B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.5 51.8 44.4 3.5 0.1 0.2 1114

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability
College of appointment Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 4.5 54.0 43.8 2.2 . . 276
..... CED 4.5 49.0 47.1 3.9 . . 51
..... CHASS 4.5 59.2 35.5 4.8 0.4 . 228
..... CNR 4.4 44.3 49.2 6.6 . . 61
..... COE 4.4 44.7 49.7 5.0 . 0.6 161
..... COM 4.3 35.2 63.0 1.9 . . 54
..... COT 4.4 44.8 51.7 3.4 . . 29
..... CVM 4.4 50.7 42.7 6.7 . . 75
..... Design 4.6 59.3 40.7 . . . 27
..... FYC 4.8 75.0 25.0 . . . 8
..... PAMS 4.5 54.8 43.5 0.9 . 0.9 115
..... Student Affairs 4.5 48.3 51.7 . . . 29
Back to top


B3f: Grade own professional achievement

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 4.4 46.9 46.3 6.3 0.4 0.2 1115

B3f: Grade own professional achievement
College of appointment Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 4.5 51.6 42.2 6.1 . . 277
..... CED 4.4 43.1 52.9 3.9 . . 51
..... CHASS 4.4 48.2 41.7 8.8 1.3 . 228
..... CNR 4.3 39.3 55.7 4.9 . . 61
..... COE 4.3 41.0 50.3 7.5 0.6 0.6 161
..... COM 4.3 38.9 55.6 5.6 . . 54
..... COT 4.5 51.7 44.8 3.4 . . 29
..... CVM 4.4 44.0 48.0 8.0 . . 75
..... Design 4.5 48.1 51.9 . . . 27
..... FYC 4.5 50.0 50.0 . . . 8
..... PAMS 4.5 51.3 44.3 3.5 . 0.9 115
..... Student Affairs 4.4 44.8 48.3 6.9 . . 29
Back to top


B4: Department's vision for the future

  Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 32.0 37.6 25.8 4.5 1121

B4: Department's vision for the future
College of appointment* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 32.6 40.2 24.6 2.5 276
..... CED 23.1 46.2 30.8 . 52
..... CHASS 23.7 34.2 33.8 8.3 228
..... CNR 29.5 42.6 23.0 4.9 61
..... COE 26.8 38.4 27.4 7.3 164
..... COM 32.7 36.4 29.1 1.8 55
..... COT 55.2 6.9 37.9 . 29
..... CVM 45.3 32.0 16.0 6.7 75
..... Design 40.7 33.3 25.9 . 27
..... FYC 50.0 25.0 25.0 . 8
..... PAMS 42.2 45.7 10.3 1.7 116
..... Student Affairs 30.0 33.3 30.0 6.7 30
Back to top


B5: Agreement with department vision for future

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 35.4 59.2 4.7 0.6 773

B5: Agreement with department vision for future
College of appointment Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.3 38.9 56.1 4.5 0.5 198
..... CED 3.3 30.6 69.4 . . 36
..... CHASS 3.2 32.1 60.3 6.1 1.5 131
..... CNR 3.3 36.4 61.4 2.3 . 44
..... COE 3.2 26.7 70.5 2.9 . 105
..... COM 3.3 34.2 63.2 2.6 . 38
..... COT 3.6 61.1 38.9 . . 18
..... CVM 3.3 37.9 51.7 8.6 1.7 58
..... Design 3.5 52.6 47.4 . . 19
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.2 33.7 57.4 7.9 1.0 101
..... Student Affairs 3.3 36.8 57.9 5.3 . 19
Back to top


B6: College's vision for the future

  Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
Total(N) 22.4 35.8 23.5 18.3 1120

B6: College's vision for the future
College of appointment* Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals (%)
Vision with
slow progress (%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar (%)


Total(N)
..... CALS 18.3 33.8 33.5 14.4 278
..... CED 48.1 42.3 9.6 . 52
..... CHASS 12.7 37.3 22.4 27.6 228
..... CNR 27.9 29.5 26.2 16.4 61
..... COE 9.2 39.3 23.3 28.2 163
..... COM 32.7 45.5 20.0 1.8 55
..... COT 31.0 31.0 37.9 . 29
..... CVM 44.0 38.7 9.3 8.0 75
..... Design 50.0 38.5 11.5 . 26
..... FYC 37.5 37.5 25.0 . 8
..... PAMS 25.6 26.5 17.1 30.8 117
..... Student Affairs 28.6 39.3 21.4 10.7 28
Back to top


B7a: Department change in next five years

  Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 56.4 14.7 28.8 1120

B7a: Department change in next five years
College of appointment* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 58.5 15.5 26.0 277
..... CED 76.9 3.8 19.2 52
..... CHASS 48.0 14.5 37.4 227
..... CNR 65.6 14.8 19.7 61
..... COE 63.2 11.7 25.2 163
..... COM 52.7 20.0 27.3 55
..... COT 62.1 17.2 20.7 29
..... CVM 56.0 12.0 32.0 75
..... Design 69.2 11.5 19.2 26
..... FYC 75.0 12.5 12.5 8
..... PAMS 44.4 22.2 33.3 117
..... Student Affairs 43.3 13.3 43.3 30
Back to top


B7b: College change in next five years

  Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 45.0 12.7 42.3 1109

B7b: College change in next five years
College of appointment* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 33.0 17.4 49.6 276
..... CED 69.2 9.6 21.2 52
..... CHASS 42.2 12.0 45.8 225
..... CNR 54.1 11.5 34.4 61
..... COE 54.6 4.9 40.5 163
..... COM 51.9 16.7 31.5 54
..... COT 51.7 17.2 31.0 29
..... CVM 56.8 13.5 29.7 74
..... Design 50.0 3.8 46.2 26
..... FYC 62.5 12.5 25.0 8
..... PAMS 33.0 17.9 49.1 112
..... Student Affairs 51.7 . 48.3 29
Back to top


B7c: NC State change in next five years

  Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 42.0 11.1 46.8 1113

B7c: NC State change in next five years
College of appointment* Change for
the better (%)
Change for
the worse (%)
Not really
change (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 41.1 13.1 45.8 275
..... CED 63.5 7.7 28.8 52
..... CHASS 37.6 15.0 47.3 226
..... CNR 49.2 13.1 37.7 61
..... COE 38.0 6.1 55.8 163
..... COM 38.2 5.5 56.4 55
..... COT 55.2 10.3 34.5 29
..... CVM 42.7 5.3 52.0 75
..... Design 46.2 19.2 34.6 26
..... FYC 50.0 12.5 37.5 8
..... PAMS 36.3 13.3 50.4 113
..... Student Affairs 63.3 3.3 33.3 30
Back to top

Continue to Section C: Leadership


View These Results by Academic Profile

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section B: Image and Vision results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page