NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section J: Pay and Compensation

Tables of Results
by College


The following tables provide results to questions in Section J: Pay and Compensation, broken down by college. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between colleges are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section J: Pay and Compensation results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section J by Academic Profile | Section J by Demographic Profile


J1a: My salary is competitive within my department

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 15.3 49.1 23.5 12.1 860

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 20.5 48.3 22.4 8.8 205
..... CED 2.9 23.8 52.4 14.3 9.5 42
..... CHASS 2.5 14.4 41.7 26.7 17.1 187
..... CNR 2.6 8.5 59.6 17.0 14.9 47
..... COE 2.7 11.2 52.6 27.6 8.6 116
..... COM 2.4 9.1 40.9 34.1 15.9 44
..... COT 2.7 11.5 57.7 23.1 7.7 26
..... CVM 2.8 22.0 50.8 15.3 11.9 59
..... Design 2.9 25.0 45.0 20.0 10.0 20
..... FYC 2.8 . 75.0 25.0 . 4
..... PAMS 2.6 9.4 54.1 25.9 10.6 85
..... Student Affairs 2.5 12.0 52.0 12.0 24.0 25
Back to top


J1b: My salary is competitive within my college

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 9.3 42.2 32.0 16.5 690

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 12.5 47.7 25.0 14.8 176
..... CED 2.7 13.9 50.0 27.8 8.3 36
..... CHASS 2.2 4.9 31.5 42.0 21.7 143
..... CNR 2.5 5.3 52.6 28.9 13.2 38
..... COE 2.4 7.3 40.2 39.0 13.4 82
..... COM 2.2 2.4 39.0 39.0 19.5 41
..... COT 2.5 8.0 52.0 24.0 16.0 25
..... CVM 2.7 23.6 36.4 23.6 16.4 55
..... Design 2.8 15.8 52.6 26.3 5.3 19
..... FYC 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
..... PAMS 2.4 3.5 47.4 31.6 17.5 57
..... Student Affairs 1.9 6.7 20.0 33.3 40.0 15
Back to top


J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.2 7.9 32.4 33.4 26.3 670

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.4 10.1 37.9 35.5 16.6 169
..... CED 1.9 2.8 11.1 58.3 27.8 36
..... CHASS 1.6 1.3 11.4 36.7 50.6 158
..... CNR 2.3 5.3 39.5 34.2 21.1 38
..... COE 2.8 11.3 64.8 21.1 2.8 71
..... COM 2.8 6.7 73.3 10.0 10.0 30
..... COT 1.9 5.3 21.1 31.6 42.1 19
..... CVM 3.0 35.6 37.8 15.6 11.1 45
..... Design 1.8 4.8 4.8 57.1 33.3 21
..... FYC 2.3 . 33.3 66.7 . 3
..... PAMS 2.3 3.4 43.1 34.5 19.0 58
..... Student Affairs 1.5 4.5 . 31.8 63.6 22
Back to top


J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.1 5.6 29.3 37.5 27.5 610

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 6.3 35.4 36.7 21.5 158
..... CED 2.2 3.4 41.4 31.0 24.1 29
..... CHASS 1.8 2.6 16.7 41.7 39.1 156
..... CNR 2.3 6.9 44.8 24.1 24.1 29
..... COE 2.4 7.4 38.2 36.8 17.6 68
..... COM 2.3 5.7 31.4 45.7 17.1 35
..... COT 1.9 7.1 7.1 50.0 35.7 14
..... CVM 2.3 14.3 28.6 25.7 31.4 35
..... Design 2.7 16.7 41.7 33.3 8.3 12
..... FYC 2.0 . . 100.0 . 2
..... PAMS 2.1 1.8 33.9 35.7 28.6 56
..... Student Affairs 1.6 6.3 . 43.8 50.0 16
Back to top


J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 1.9 4.6 20.1 39.2 36.1 811

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.1 6.3 26.2 39.3 28.3 191
..... CED 2.3 5.3 34.2 42.1 18.4 38
..... CHASS 1.7 3.3 12.5 35.3 48.9 184
..... CNR 2.3 2.2 45.7 34.8 17.4 46
..... COE 1.8 2.7 13.5 43.2 40.5 111
..... COM 1.8 2.1 17.0 42.6 38.3 47
..... COT 1.7 4.8 4.8 47.6 42.9 21
..... CVM 2.0 6.8 20.3 42.4 30.5 59
..... Design 2.1 20.0 13.3 26.7 40.0 15
..... FYC 2.0 . . 100.0 . 3
..... PAMS 2.0 3.9 23.4 37.7 35.1 77
..... Student Affairs 1.5 5.3 . 36.8 57.9 19
Back to top


J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined

  Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 18.8 40.3 21.6 19.3 1045

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
well (%)
3: Fairly
well (%)
2: Not very
well (%)
1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 19.2 37.4 25.3 18.1 265
..... CED 2.6 17.6 45.1 21.6 15.7 51
..... CHASS 2.8 25.9 40.7 19.4 13.9 216
..... CNR 2.3 13.0 35.2 20.4 31.5 54
..... COE 2.3 9.6 37.7 27.4 25.3 146
..... COM 3.0 21.2 61.5 15.4 1.9 52
..... COT 2.3 14.8 33.3 22.2 29.6 27
..... CVM 2.7 22.5 40.8 16.9 19.7 71
..... Design 2.8 29.2 33.3 20.8 16.7 24
..... FYC 1.2 . . 20.0 80.0 5
..... PAMS 2.6 17.0 44.3 16.0 22.6 106
..... Student Affairs 2.4 10.7 42.9 21.4 25.0 28
Back to top


J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 22.7 52.0 16.5 8.7 932

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 23.0 54.7 16.5 5.8 243
..... CED 3.0 29.8 46.8 17.0 6.4 47
..... CHASS 2.8 25.4 45.6 16.1 13.0 193
..... CNR 2.6 13.0 52.2 15.2 19.6 46
..... COE 2.8 15.9 57.1 19.0 7.9 126
..... COM 3.0 23.9 54.3 15.2 6.5 46
..... COT 3.0 34.6 38.5 23.1 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.0 27.3 51.5 16.7 4.5 66
..... Design 3.1 30.0 55.0 5.0 10.0 20
..... FYC 2.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 4
..... PAMS 3.0 21.7 58.7 14.1 5.4 92
..... Student Affairs 2.5 13.0 43.5 26.1 17.4 23
Back to top


J4: I have access to benefits information

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.3 36.8 56.5 6.1 0.7 1038

J4: I have access to benefits information
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.3 37.5 55.9 5.7 0.8 261
..... CED 3.3 37.3 52.9 9.8 . 51
..... CHASS 3.3 38.4 53.2 7.4 0.9 216
..... CNR 3.4 40.7 53.7 5.6 . 54
..... COE 3.2 29.5 65.8 4.8 . 146
..... COM 3.3 38.5 55.8 3.8 1.9 52
..... COT 3.3 33.3 66.7 . . 27
..... CVM 3.3 44.3 45.7 8.6 1.4 70
..... Design 3.3 33.3 58.3 8.3 . 24
..... FYC 3.2 40.0 40.0 20.0 . 5
..... PAMS 3.2 30.8 62.5 5.8 1.0 104
..... Student Affairs 3.5 53.6 46.4 . . 28
Back to top


J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.0 5.3 25.1 32.1 37.6 889

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 1.8 3.8 19.6 32.3 44.3 235
..... CED 2.0 2.3 31.8 29.5 36.4 44
..... CHASS 2.2 9.0 31.5 30.9 28.7 178
..... CNR 1.8 . 19.2 46.2 34.6 52
..... COE 1.8 3.2 19.8 31.0 46.0 126
..... COM 1.9 4.3 26.1 28.3 41.3 46
..... COT 2.2 11.1 22.2 44.4 22.2 18
..... CVM 2.0 4.7 29.7 28.1 37.5 64
..... Design 2.3 10.5 26.3 42.1 21.1 19
..... FYC 2.0 . 40.0 20.0 40.0 5
..... PAMS 2.0 5.7 25.3 33.3 35.6 87
..... Student Affairs 2.7 20.0 53.3 6.7 20.0 15
Back to top


J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 7.0 47.5 24.2 21.2 810

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 8.1 41.7 26.1 24.2 211
..... CED 2.5 7.5 52.5 25.0 15.0 40
..... CHASS 2.5 9.9 52.2 19.9 18.0 161
..... CNR 2.4 2.1 52.1 31.3 14.6 48
..... COE 2.2 2.6 42.6 27.0 27.8 115
..... COM 2.2 6.8 40.9 18.2 34.1 44
..... COT 2.5 5.9 58.8 17.6 17.6 17
..... CVM 2.5 8.1 53.2 22.6 16.1 62
..... Design 2.7 6.3 68.8 12.5 12.5 16
..... FYC 1.8 . 25.0 25.0 50.0 4
..... PAMS 2.4 7.9 44.7 28.9 18.4 76
..... Student Affairs 2.8 6.3 68.8 18.8 6.3 16
Back to top


J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 7.2 61.6 19.5 11.8 627

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.5 6.4 54.7 25.0 14.0 172
..... CED 2.7 5.4 64.9 21.6 8.1 37
..... CHASS 2.8 12.7 62.7 14.5 10.0 110
..... CNR 2.8 7.5 70.0 12.5 10.0 40
..... COE 2.6 3.3 62.6 24.2 9.9 91
..... COM 2.5 5.4 54.1 21.6 18.9 37
..... COT 2.9 10.0 80.0 . 10.0 10
..... CVM 2.7 10.9 63.0 15.2 10.9 46
..... Design 3.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 . 12
..... FYC 2.3 . 66.7 . 33.3 3
..... PAMS 2.6 3.6 64.3 16.1 16.1 56
..... Student Affairs 2.8 7.7 69.2 23.1 . 13
Back to top


J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 4.3 42.6 38.0 15.0 1039

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.5 5.7 50.0 35.2 9.1 264
..... CED 2.5 5.9 49.0 39.2 5.9 51
..... CHASS 2.1 2.8 31.9 36.1 29.2 216
..... CNR 2.5 3.7 50.0 35.2 11.1 54
..... COE 2.3 2.1 40.0 41.4 16.6 145
..... COM 2.1 1.9 34.6 38.5 25.0 52
..... COT 2.3 7.7 26.9 53.8 11.5 26
..... CVM 2.5 7.0 42.3 40.8 9.9 71
..... Design 2.5 4.3 47.8 43.5 4.3 23
..... FYC 2.2 . 20.0 80.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.5 4.8 49.0 37.5 8.7 104
..... Student Affairs 2.5 7.1 50.0 32.1 10.7 28
Back to top


J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 19.9 57.2 16.5 6.4 1026

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.9 21.1 59.0 13.0 6.9 261
..... CED 3.0 23.5 56.9 13.7 5.9 51
..... CHASS 2.9 22.3 50.7 18.5 8.5 211
..... CNR 2.9 20.4 57.4 16.7 5.6 54
..... COE 2.9 16.7 61.1 18.1 4.2 144
..... COM 3.1 26.9 63.5 5.8 3.8 52
..... COT 2.9 15.4 61.5 19.2 3.8 26
..... CVM 2.8 14.1 56.3 26.8 2.8 71
..... Design 2.5 . 56.5 34.8 8.7 23
..... FYC 3.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.8 16.0 57.0 17.0 10.0 100
..... Student Affairs 3.3 35.7 57.1 3.6 3.6 28
Back to top


J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 11.8 63.0 19.4 5.9 1021

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 13.7 59.5 19.8 6.9 262
..... CED 2.9 16.0 66.0 14.0 4.0 50
..... CHASS 2.7 10.5 57.6 24.8 7.1 210
..... CNR 2.7 11.1 59.3 22.2 7.4 54
..... COE 2.9 11.2 67.1 18.9 2.8 143
..... COM 3.1 17.6 72.5 7.8 2.0 51
..... COT 2.9 14.8 63.0 18.5 3.7 27
..... CVM 2.8 11.6 62.3 21.7 4.3 69
..... Design 2.6 . 65.2 30.4 4.3 23
..... FYC 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.7 6.1 67.7 15.2 11.1 99
..... Student Affairs 3.1 17.9 78.6 3.6 . 28
Back to top


J11a: Importance of flexible work hours

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 75.0 21.4 2.6 1.1 1038

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.7 69.7 26.5 3.0 0.8 264
..... CED 3.9 94.1 5.9 . . 51
..... CHASS 3.8 80.9 16.3 2.3 0.5 215
..... CNR 3.8 83.3 16.7 . . 54
..... COE 3.7 73.3 20.5 4.1 2.1 146
..... COM 3.5 60.8 35.3 2.0 2.0 51
..... COT 3.7 70.4 25.9 3.7 . 27
..... CVM 3.7 70.4 28.2 1.4 . 71
..... Design 3.7 69.6 26.1 4.3 . 23
..... FYC 4.0 100.0 . . . 5
..... PAMS 3.6 74.8 17.5 3.9 3.9 103
..... Student Affairs 3.8 78.6 21.4 . . 28
Back to top


J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 73.7 22.1 2.3 1.8 1039

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.7 72.8 23.4 2.3 1.5 265
..... CED 3.8 86.3 9.8 2.0 2.0 51
..... CHASS 3.7 81.4 14.0 2.8 1.9 215
..... CNR 3.6 66.7 31.5 . 1.9 54
..... COE 3.5 63.7 30.1 2.7 3.4 146
..... COM 3.4 51.9 42.3 3.8 1.9 52
..... COT 3.7 74.1 22.2 3.7 . 27
..... CVM 3.8 78.9 19.7 1.4 . 71
..... Design 3.8 78.3 21.7 . . 23
..... FYC 3.8 80.0 20.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.6 73.5 20.6 2.9 2.9 102
..... Student Affairs 3.9 89.3 10.7 . . 28
Back to top


J11c: Importance of family leave time

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.7 71.3 25.8 2.0 0.8 1033

J11c: Importance of family leave time
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.7 71.6 26.9 1.5 . 264
..... CED 3.7 78.0 20.0 . 2.0 50
..... CHASS 3.8 83.2 14.5 1.4 0.9 214
..... CNR 3.6 61.1 37.0 . 1.9 54
..... COE 3.6 60.7 35.9 2.1 1.4 145
..... COM 3.3 47.1 41.2 9.8 2.0 51
..... COT 3.7 70.4 29.6 . . 27
..... CVM 3.7 73.2 26.8 . . 71
..... Design 3.7 73.9 17.4 8.7 . 23
..... FYC 3.8 80.0 20.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.6 69.3 25.7 4.0 1.0 101
..... Student Affairs 3.9 85.7 14.3 . . 28
Back to top


J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 70.4 24.6 3.7 1.4 1036

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.7 72.8 23.8 3.0 0.4 265
..... CED 3.8 82.4 15.7 2.0 . 51
..... CHASS 3.7 75.6 19.7 1.9 2.8 213
..... CNR 3.6 70.4 24.1 3.7 1.9 54
..... COE 3.5 56.2 36.3 4.8 2.7 146
..... COM 3.4 50.0 38.5 11.5 . 52
..... COT 3.7 66.7 33.3 . . 27
..... CVM 3.8 80.3 18.3 1.4 . 71
..... Design 3.7 73.9 21.7 4.3 . 23
..... FYC 3.8 80.0 20.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.6 70.6 20.6 6.9 2.0 102
..... Student Affairs 3.7 70.4 25.9 3.7 . 27
Back to top


J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 56.8 32.0 8.4 2.8 1035

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 59.7 31.2 6.8 2.3 263
..... CED 3.6 70.6 21.6 5.9 2.0 51
..... CHASS 3.5 65.3 26.8 5.6 2.3 213
..... CNR 3.4 53.7 31.5 13.0 1.9 54
..... COE 3.2 42.5 40.4 12.3 4.8 146
..... COM 3.0 30.8 48.1 15.4 5.8 52
..... COT 3.5 59.3 33.3 7.4 . 27
..... CVM 3.4 49.3 39.4 11.3 . 71
..... Design 3.7 82.6 13.0 . 4.3 23
..... FYC 3.8 80.0 20.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.3 52.0 34.3 8.8 4.9 102
..... Student Affairs 3.7 78.6 14.3 7.1 . 28
Back to top


J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.5 66.6 23.0 7.4 2.9 1034

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 70.7 21.3 6.5 1.5 263
..... CED 3.7 78.4 17.6 . 3.9 51
..... CHASS 3.5 65.9 25.7 5.1 3.3 214
..... CNR 3.4 58.5 26.4 9.4 5.7 53
..... COE 3.6 66.7 23.6 8.3 1.4 144
..... COM 3.0 40.4 32.7 17.3 9.6 52
..... COT 3.5 66.7 22.2 7.4 3.7 27
..... CVM 3.6 69.0 22.5 8.5 . 71
..... Design 3.6 73.9 17.4 4.3 4.3 23
..... FYC 3.8 80.0 20.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.4 59.2 23.3 12.6 4.9 103
..... Student Affairs 3.9 89.3 7.1 3.6 . 28
Back to top

Continue to Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment


View These Results by Academic Profile

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section J: Pay and Compensation results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page