NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

Tables of Results
by College


The following tables provide results to questions in Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment, broken down by college. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between colleges are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section K by Academic Profile | Section K by Demographic Profile


K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 17.6 43.0 25.4 14.0 1039

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.5 14.8 38.0 28.1 19.0 263
..... CED 2.7 23.5 39.2 23.5 13.7 51
..... CHASS 2.8 21.9 47.0 22.3 8.8 215
..... CNR 2.5 15.1 34.0 32.1 18.9 53
..... COE 2.5 12.5 39.6 31.3 16.7 144
..... COM 2.5 9.6 50.0 21.2 19.2 52
..... COT 3.3 37.0 51.9 11.1 . 27
..... CVM 2.8 18.3 50.7 21.1 9.9 71
..... Design 2.7 20.8 41.7 20.8 16.7 24
..... FYC 2.6 . 80.0 . 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.7 17.0 42.5 29.2 11.3 106
..... Student Affairs 3.1 28.6 57.1 10.7 3.6 28
Back to top


K2: I have sufficient tech assistance

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 16.9 47.2 26.5 9.4 1039

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 16.4 43.5 27.9 12.2 262
..... CED 3.1 29.4 52.9 11.8 5.9 51
..... CHASS 2.9 21.4 55.3 20.0 3.3 215
..... CNR 2.6 13.0 42.6 31.5 13.0 54
..... COE 2.5 9.7 48.3 29.0 13.1 145
..... COM 2.4 7.7 42.3 34.6 15.4 52
..... COT 3.0 25.9 51.9 22.2 . 27
..... CVM 2.6 12.9 40.0 38.6 8.6 70
..... Design 2.7 20.8 41.7 25.0 12.5 24
..... FYC 3.0 . 100.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 2.6 16.0 41.5 31.1 11.3 106
..... Student Affairs 3.1 32.1 50.0 14.3 3.6 28
Back to top


K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 12.8 52.8 26.8 7.6 1025

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)
2: Disagree (%) 1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 8.5 52.3 31.2 8.1 260
..... CED 2.9 19.6 56.9 15.7 7.8 51
..... CHASS 2.9 16.7 56.5 23.0 3.8 209
..... CNR 2.7 13.2 52.8 24.5 9.4 53
..... COE 2.6 8.5 55.6 27.5 8.5 142
..... COM 2.3 5.8 38.5 38.5 17.3 52
..... COT 3.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 . 27
..... CVM 2.7 14.1 47.9 32.4 5.6 71
..... Design 2.8 16.7 45.8 33.3 4.2 24
..... FYC 3.2 20.0 80.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 2.6 12.6 50.5 24.3 12.6 103
..... Student Affairs 3.1 28.6 53.6 14.3 3.6 28
Back to top


K4a: Satisfaction with office space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 33.8 45.9 14.6 5.8 1037

K4a: Satisfaction with office space
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.1 36.8 44.8 11.5 6.9 261
..... CED 3.3 45.1 45.1 3.9 5.9 51
..... CHASS 2.7 20.1 43.9 25.2 10.7 214
..... CNR 3.0 29.6 44.4 18.5 7.4 54
..... COE 3.1 31.7 51.0 14.5 2.8 145
..... COM 3.5 45.1 54.9 . . 51
..... COT 3.4 55.6 33.3 7.4 3.7 27
..... CVM 3.2 42.3 42.3 12.7 2.8 71
..... Design 3.0 33.3 37.5 25.0 4.2 24
..... FYC 3.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 . 5
..... PAMS 3.2 34.9 49.1 12.3 3.8 106
..... Student Affairs 3.3 42.9 46.4 10.7 . 28
Back to top


K4b: Satisfaction with lab space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 20.5 49.0 19.4 11.1 567

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 23.0 49.5 15.8 11.7 196
..... CED 2.7 6.7 66.7 20.0 6.7 15
..... CHASS 2.4 11.6 41.9 23.3 23.3 43
..... CNR 2.5 16.7 36.7 30.0 16.7 30
..... COE 2.8 17.2 53.1 21.1 8.6 128
..... COM 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 2
..... COT 3.0 32.0 44.0 12.0 12.0 25
..... CVM 2.9 23.2 50.0 23.2 3.6 56
..... Design 2.5 15.4 38.5 23.1 23.1 13
..... FYC 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
..... PAMS 2.8 23.9 45.7 21.7 8.7 46
..... Student Affairs 3.1 30.0 60.0 . 10.0 10
Back to top


K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 17.0 51.1 23.7 8.3 967

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 15.6 55.0 22.7 6.6 211
..... CED 2.4 4.2 47.9 33.3 14.6 48
..... CHASS 2.5 7.9 46.0 29.8 16.3 215
..... CNR 2.7 11.4 54.5 29.5 4.5 44
..... COE 3.1 29.4 51.7 14.7 4.2 143
..... COM 3.2 35.3 51.0 13.7 . 51
..... COT 3.6 68.0 28.0 4.0 . 25
..... CVM 3.0 17.1 65.7 15.7 1.4 70
..... Design 2.6 4.3 56.5 34.8 4.3 23
..... FYC 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.5 7.7 48.1 31.7 12.5 104
..... Student Affairs 3.1 32.1 46.4 17.9 3.6 28
Back to top


K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 21.3 49.9 21.3 7.4 431

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 23.2 44.0 20.0 12.8 125
..... CED 2.7 5.0 60.0 30.0 5.0 20
..... CHASS 2.9 16.7 60.0 20.0 3.3 30
..... CNR 2.7 9.1 59.1 27.3 4.5 22
..... COE 2.9 27.3 45.5 21.6 5.7 88
..... COM 2.7 33.3 33.3 . 33.3 3
..... COT 3.5 50.0 45.5 4.5 . 22
..... CVM 3.0 14.3 71.4 14.3 . 49
..... Design 2.4 5.6 44.4 33.3 16.7 18
..... FYC 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
..... PAMS 2.8 19.5 41.5 34.1 4.9 41
..... Student Affairs 2.8 30.0 40.0 10.0 20.0 10
Back to top


K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 10.6 48.6 25.7 15.1 1032

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.5 13.0 39.3 27.5 20.2 262
..... CED 2.6 10.0 52.0 24.0 14.0 50
..... CHASS 2.5 4.7 52.8 27.8 14.6 212
..... CNR 2.5 5.6 57.4 20.4 16.7 54
..... COE 2.6 14.6 47.9 24.3 13.2 144
..... COM 2.8 7.8 68.6 19.6 3.9 51
..... COT 2.4 7.4 44.4 29.6 18.5 27
..... CVM 2.6 8.5 54.9 23.9 12.7 71
..... Design 2.8 12.5 58.3 25.0 4.2 24
..... FYC 2.4 . 60.0 20.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.5 11.5 41.3 28.8 18.3 104
..... Student Affairs 3.2 32.1 53.6 14.3 . 28
Back to top


K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 10.5 41.4 28.6 19.5 1030

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 14.9 29.9 25.7 29.5 261
..... CED 2.4 5.9 45.1 35.3 13.7 51
..... CHASS 2.2 2.9 37.3 38.3 21.5 209
..... CNR 2.4 1.9 57.4 18.5 22.2 54
..... COE 2.7 18.8 45.8 20.8 14.6 144
..... COM 2.8 5.8 75.0 17.3 1.9 52
..... COT 2.6 11.5 53.8 19.2 15.4 26
..... CVM 2.5 12.7 42.3 31.0 14.1 71
..... Design 2.6 12.5 41.7 37.5 8.3 24
..... FYC 2.4 . 60.0 20.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.4 8.6 38.1 36.2 17.1 105
..... Student Affairs 2.8 17.9 50.0 21.4 10.7 28
Back to top


K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 12.3 53.6 24.9 9.2 1022

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 9.3 52.9 25.5 12.4 259
..... CED 2.9 18.0 56.0 22.0 4.0 50
..... CHASS 2.5 7.6 51.0 29.5 11.9 210
..... CNR 2.7 11.5 53.8 30.8 3.8 52
..... COE 2.7 12.4 51.0 28.3 8.3 145
..... COM 3.0 17.3 71.2 9.6 1.9 52
..... COT 3.1 30.8 53.8 11.5 3.8 26
..... CVM 2.8 14.1 60.6 21.1 4.2 71
..... Design 2.9 16.7 54.2 29.2 . 24
..... FYC 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.6 13.0 49.0 23.0 15.0 100
..... Student Affairs 3.1 32.1 50.0 14.3 3.6 28
Back to top


K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 19.7 58.1 16.2 6.0 1036

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 13.3 54.4 19.0 13.3 263
..... CED 3.2 27.5 62.7 9.8 . 51
..... CHASS 2.9 16.4 57.5 21.5 4.7 214
..... CNR 3.3 38.9 55.6 3.7 1.9 54
..... COE 3.0 16.0 66.7 16.0 1.4 144
..... COM 3.2 30.8 61.5 7.7 . 52
..... COT 3.6 55.6 44.4 . . 27
..... CVM 2.7 15.7 50.0 22.9 11.4 70
..... Design 2.8 8.3 66.7 20.8 4.2 24
..... FYC 3.2 40.0 40.0 20.0 . 5
..... PAMS 3.0 19.2 63.5 12.5 4.8 104
..... Student Affairs 3.3 35.7 53.6 10.7 . 28
Back to top


K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 12.3 45.3 29.2 13.3 1012

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 15.4 53.1 20.5 11.0 254
..... CED 2.1 3.9 27.5 43.1 25.5 51
..... CHASS 2.1 3.0 32.0 40.5 24.5 200
..... CNR 2.7 9.3 57.4 29.6 3.7 54
..... COE 2.8 15.2 57.2 22.8 4.8 145
..... COM 2.7 13.7 58.8 15.7 11.8 51
..... COT 3.3 40.7 51.9 3.7 3.7 27
..... CVM 2.6 14.3 37.1 38.6 10.0 70
..... Design 2.2 8.3 20.8 50.0 20.8 24
..... FYC 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.5 13.6 40.8 32.0 13.6 103
..... Student Affairs 2.7 21.4 39.3 28.6 10.7 28
Back to top


K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.2 3.4 38.2 35.8 22.6 743

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 4.3 44.9 31.9 18.9 185
..... CED 2.4 5.3 47.4 34.2 13.2 38
..... CHASS 2.1 1.4 32.6 42.0 23.9 138
..... CNR 2.4 2.9 54.3 25.7 17.1 35
..... COE 2.0 1.6 26.2 37.7 34.4 122
..... COM 2.0 . 26.7 50.0 23.3 30
..... COT 1.8 . 28.0 28.0 44.0 25
..... CVM 2.4 4.9 46.3 34.1 14.6 41
..... Design 2.2 8.7 30.4 34.8 26.1 23
..... FYC 2.8 . 75.0 25.0 . 4
..... PAMS 2.2 4.9 33.3 42.0 19.8 81
..... Student Affairs 2.9 9.5 76.2 9.5 4.8 21
Back to top


K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 5.6 47.8 26.4 20.1 1010

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 5.5 44.1 27.2 23.2 254
..... CED 2.3 5.9 41.2 33.3 19.6 51
..... CHASS 2.3 7.9 42.4 25.6 24.1 203
..... CNR 1.8 . 20.4 38.9 40.7 54
..... COE 2.5 3.5 55.6 29.9 11.1 144
..... COM 2.7 10.2 57.1 22.4 10.2 49
..... COT 2.7 18.5 48.1 22.2 11.1 27
..... CVM 2.6 2.9 65.7 17.1 14.3 70
..... Design 2.7 . 79.2 8.3 12.5 24
..... FYC 2.4 . 60.0 20.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.5 5.9 52.0 27.5 14.7 102
..... Student Affairs 2.1 3.7 40.7 18.5 37.0 27
Back to top


K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.0 2.5 29.5 36.1 31.9 1006

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.0 2.8 26.9 36.0 34.4 253
..... CED 2.0 3.9 23.5 41.2 31.4 51
..... CHASS 1.9 2.0 27.5 31.5 39.0 200
..... CNR 1.6 . 13.2 32.1 54.7 53
..... COE 2.2 1.4 39.6 39.6 19.4 144
..... COM 2.4 8.0 38.0 36.0 18.0 50
..... COT 1.7 . 18.5 37.0 44.4 27
..... CVM 2.1 2.8 28.2 45.1 23.9 71
..... Design 2.2 . 33.3 50.0 16.7 24
..... FYC 1.4 . . 40.0 60.0 5
..... PAMS 2.2 4.0 40.6 28.7 26.7 101
..... Student Affairs 1.8 . 18.5 40.7 40.7 27
Back to top


K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 8.3 65.7 19.0 7.0 327

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 8.3 63.5 17.7 10.4 96
..... CED 2.9 . 92.3 7.7 . 13
..... CHASS 2.7 5.8 67.3 17.3 9.6 52
..... CNR 2.6 5.3 57.9 26.3 10.5 19
..... COE 2.8 10.5 64.9 17.5 7.0 57
..... COM 3.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 . 4
..... COT 2.4 . 50.0 41.7 8.3 12
..... CVM 3.0 20.0 65.0 10.0 5.0 20
..... Design 2.9 . 87.5 12.5 . 8
..... FYC 2.0 . . 100.0 . 1
..... PAMS 2.8 10.5 63.2 26.3 . 38
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 7
Back to top


K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 4.9 45.6 30.6 18.9 471

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 3.6 39.1 37.0 20.3 138
..... CED 2.4 . 60.0 24.0 16.0 25
..... CHASS 2.6 6.9 65.5 10.3 17.2 29
..... CNR 2.5 4.0 64.0 12.0 20.0 25
..... COE 2.3 2.7 43.6 37.3 16.4 110
..... COM 2.5 6.7 46.7 33.3 13.3 15
..... COT 2.3 9.1 36.4 27.3 27.3 22
..... CVM 3.0 16.7 66.7 12.5 4.2 24
..... Design 2.5 . 70.0 10.0 20.0 10
..... FYC 1.0 . . . 100.0 2
..... PAMS 2.2 7.7 30.8 36.9 24.6 65
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 83.3 16.7 . 6
Back to top


K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 5.0 73.9 16.1 4.9 898

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 4.7 69.8 17.4 8.1 235
..... CED 2.8 6.5 71.7 17.4 4.3 46
..... CHASS 2.7 4.0 70.5 20.2 5.2 173
..... CNR 2.8 5.9 76.5 13.7 3.9 51
..... COE 2.9 5.0 81.8 12.4 0.8 121
..... COM 2.7 4.4 71.1 17.8 6.7 45
..... COT 2.9 12.0 72.0 12.0 4.0 25
..... CVM 2.9 5.0 85.0 6.7 3.3 60
..... Design 2.5 4.5 45.5 45.5 4.5 22
..... FYC 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.8 5.6 76.7 13.3 4.4 90
..... Student Affairs 3.0 4.0 96.0 . . 25
Back to top


K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 3.6 56.7 28.3 11.4 1009

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.4 3.5 48.6 32.2 15.7 255
..... CED 2.5 . 58.8 29.4 11.8 51
..... CHASS 2.6 3.3 61.8 26.9 8.0 212
..... CNR 2.3 . 46.3 37.0 16.7 54
..... COE 2.5 3.6 56.4 28.6 11.4 140
..... COM 2.6 6.3 60.4 22.9 10.4 48
..... COT 2.9 11.1 77.8 3.7 7.4 27
..... CVM 2.7 3.0 71.6 16.4 9.0 67
..... Design 2.3 4.2 41.7 37.5 16.7 24
..... FYC 2.4 . 60.0 20.0 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.5 4.0 51.5 36.4 8.1 99
..... Student Affairs 2.9 7.4 77.8 11.1 3.7 27
Back to top


K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 7.8 73.6 13.3 5.3 1004

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 5.9 68.4 16.2 9.5 253
..... CED 2.8 10.0 72.0 10.0 8.0 50
..... CHASS 3.0 9.6 78.0 12.0 0.5 209
..... CNR 2.7 5.7 66.0 17.0 11.3 53
..... COE 2.8 5.7 76.6 13.5 4.3 141
..... COM 2.8 10.0 68.0 10.0 12.0 50
..... COT 3.1 14.8 81.5 3.7 . 27
..... CVM 2.9 6.0 82.1 9.0 3.0 67
..... Design 2.9 8.3 75.0 16.7 . 24
..... FYC 2.6 . 80.0 . 20.0 5
..... PAMS 2.8 7.1 73.5 16.3 3.1 98
..... Student Affairs 3.1 18.5 70.4 11.1 . 27
Back to top


K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 4.4 51.8 31.0 12.9 1010

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 3.5 45.1 32.7 18.7 257
..... CED 2.5 . 58.8 29.4 11.8 51
..... CHASS 2.5 4.3 51.9 33.8 10.0 210
..... CNR 2.1 3.8 32.1 32.1 32.1 53
..... COE 2.6 4.9 59.9 25.4 9.9 142
..... COM 2.5 6.1 49.0 34.7 10.2 49
..... COT 2.8 14.8 59.3 18.5 7.4 27
..... CVM 2.7 6.2 60.0 27.7 6.2 65
..... Design 2.5 4.2 50.0 41.7 4.2 24
..... FYC 2.0 . 40.0 20.0 40.0 5
..... PAMS 2.6 3.0 57.4 31.7 7.9 101
..... Student Affairs 2.7 7.7 57.7 26.9 7.7 26
Back to top


K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 4.3 55.6 32.8 7.3 743

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.5 4.9 51.5 35.8 7.8 204
..... CED 2.8 8.1 70.3 16.2 5.4 37
..... CHASS 2.4 2.3 44.2 41.1 12.4 129
..... CNR 2.4 . 45.8 47.9 6.3 48
..... COE 2.8 9.0 63.1 23.4 4.5 111
..... COM 3.0 4.3 87.0 8.7 . 23
..... COT 2.7 . 78.3 17.4 4.3 23
..... CVM 2.4 2.1 43.8 41.7 12.5 48
..... Design 2.6 . 58.8 41.2 . 17
..... FYC 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
..... PAMS 2.7 4.9 61.7 27.2 6.2 81
..... Student Affairs 2.6 . 63.2 36.8 . 19
Back to top


K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 5.0 60.7 28.1 6.3 684

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 5.2 56.8 29.2 8.9 192
..... CED 2.8 10.0 66.7 16.7 6.7 30
..... CHASS 2.5 3.5 48.2 40.4 7.9 114
..... CNR 2.5 . 51.1 44.4 4.4 45
..... COE 2.8 9.3 68.5 18.5 3.7 108
..... COM 3.0 9.5 85.7 4.8 . 21
..... COT 2.8 . 86.4 9.1 4.5 22
..... CVM 2.4 2.1 47.9 37.5 12.5 48
..... Design 2.5 . 53.8 38.5 7.7 13
..... FYC 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
..... PAMS 2.8 5.8 71.0 21.7 1.4 69
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 84.2 15.8 . 19
Back to top


K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 11.8 70.4 14.6 3.1 896

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.9 12.8 71.8 12.8 2.6 234
..... CED 3.0 19.1 61.7 14.9 4.3 47
..... CHASS 2.8 7.0 68.6 18.6 5.8 172
..... CNR 2.9 9.8 66.7 23.5 . 51
..... COE 2.9 12.1 71.8 13.7 2.4 124
..... COM 3.1 13.9 83.3 2.8 . 36
..... COT 2.8 7.7 73.1 11.5 7.7 26
..... CVM 2.9 12.3 67.7 18.5 1.5 65
..... Design 2.8 10.5 63.2 21.1 5.3 19
..... FYC 3.3 25.0 75.0 . . 4
..... PAMS 3.0 17.2 72.0 7.5 3.2 93
..... Student Affairs 2.8 4.0 72.0 24.0 . 25
Back to top


K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 5.0 59.8 27.2 8.0 742

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.5 4.7 56.4 28.0 10.9 211
..... CED 2.9 10.0 70.0 15.0 5.0 40
..... CHASS 2.6 4.9 61.5 26.2 7.4 122
..... CNR 2.4 6.7 42.2 40.0 11.1 45
..... COE 2.7 4.6 61.5 30.3 3.7 109
..... COM 2.9 6.9 79.3 10.3 3.4 29
..... COT 2.5 4.8 47.6 38.1 9.5 21
..... CVM 2.4 2.1 52.1 33.3 12.5 48
..... Design 2.5 . 58.8 29.4 11.8 17
..... FYC 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.7 5.6 61.1 29.2 4.2 72
..... Student Affairs 2.9 4.3 87.0 . 8.7 23
Back to top


K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 5.0 57.9 25.8 11.3 477

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.5 7.0 53.5 26.1 13.4 142
..... CED 2.8 14.3 64.3 10.7 10.7 28
..... CHASS 2.5 4.3 53.6 31.9 10.1 69
..... CNR 2.2 . 36.4 42.4 21.2 33
..... COE 2.6 2.9 67.6 20.6 8.8 68
..... COM 3.0 6.7 86.7 6.7 . 15
..... COT 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 10
..... CVM 2.4 . 55.9 26.5 17.6 34
..... Design 2.5 7.1 57.1 14.3 21.4 14
..... FYC 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 2
..... PAMS 2.6 4.3 60.9 28.3 6.5 46
..... Student Affairs 2.9 6.3 81.3 12.5 . 16
Back to top


K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 6.9 67.3 21.2 4.5 462

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied (%)
3: Satisfied (%)
2: Dissatisfied (%)
1: Very
dissatisfied (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 9.4 64.5 20.3 5.8 138
..... CED 3.0 17.9 67.9 7.1 7.1 28
..... CHASS 2.7 4.8 65.1 25.4 4.8 63
..... CNR 2.6 3.0 54.5 39.4 3.0 33
..... COE 2.8 2.9 76.8 18.8 1.4 69
..... COM 3.1 12.5 81.3 6.3 . 16
..... COT 2.6 . 69.2 23.1 7.7 13
..... CVM 2.6 3.2 58.1 32.3 6.5 31
..... Design 2.3 . 55.6 22.2 22.2 9
..... FYC 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 2
..... PAMS 2.9 8.3 72.9 16.7 2.1 48
..... Student Affairs 3.0 8.3 83.3 8.3 . 12
Back to top


K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus

  Mean Rating 4: A lot (%) 3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 27.5 26.1 19.1 27.4 1034

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: A lot (%) 3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 29.1 24.5 21.5 24.9 261
..... CED 3.0 42.0 28.0 18.0 12.0 50
..... CHASS 1.9 8.8 21.4 23.3 46.5 215
..... CNR 2.7 31.5 31.5 11.1 25.9 54
..... COE 3.0 45.5 26.2 15.9 12.4 145
..... COM 2.5 23.5 33.3 7.8 35.3 51
..... COT 3.0 44.4 22.2 18.5 14.8 27
..... CVM 2.7 31.0 29.6 16.9 22.5 71
..... Design 2.2 16.7 20.8 29.2 33.3 24
..... FYC 1.6 . 20.0 20.0 60.0 5
..... PAMS 2.7 27.2 33.0 17.5 22.3 103
..... Student Affairs 2.5 25.0 25.0 21.4 28.6 28
Back to top


K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus

  Mean Rating 4: Very
likely (%)
3: Somewhat
likely (%)
2: Not very
likely (%)
1: Not at
all likely (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 28.3 32.2 23.1 16.3 1034

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
likely (%)
3: Somewhat
likely (%)
2: Not very
likely (%)
1: Not at
all likely (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.8 31.4 31.8 22.2 14.6 261
..... CED 2.9 35.3 31.4 25.5 7.8 51
..... CHASS 2.2 10.3 28.0 30.8 30.8 214
..... CNR 3.0 35.2 38.9 13.0 13.0 54
..... COE 3.2 47.2 35.4 9.7 7.6 144
..... COM 2.5 23.1 25.0 28.8 23.1 52
..... COT 3.2 40.7 40.7 14.8 3.7 27
..... CVM 2.9 33.8 32.4 23.9 9.9 71
..... Design 2.6 20.8 37.5 20.8 20.8 24
..... FYC 2.8 20.0 40.0 40.0 . 5
..... PAMS 2.8 27.2 35.0 25.2 12.6 103
..... Student Affairs 2.3 10.7 28.6 42.9 17.9 28
Back to top

Continue to Section L: Recreation/Wellness


View These Results by Academic Profile

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page