NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

College Results
Tenure Track Faculty
(Tenured and Probationary)


The following tables provide results to questions in Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment, broken down by college for tenure track faculty only. For exact question wording for this section, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | College Results for all Faculty


To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section K only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.


K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 15.9 40.9 27.6 15.6 858

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.5 15.2 35.4 29.5 19.8 237
..... CALS
..... CED 2.6 18.6 37.2 27.9 16.3 43
..... CHASS 2.7 16.7 43.8 28.5 11.1 144
..... CNR 2.4 12.8 36.2 29.8 21.3 47
..... COE 2.5 10.5 40.6 33.1 15.8 133
..... COM 2.4 7.1 47.6 23.8 21.4 42
..... COT 3.2 34.6 53.8 11.5 . 26
..... CVM 2.8 21.0 50.0 17.7 11.3 62
..... Design 2.7 20.8 41.7 20.8 16.7 24
..... PAMS 2.7 18.3 40.9 29.0 11.8 93
..... Student Affairs 2.8 20.0 60.0 . 20.0 5
Back to Top

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 14.6 45.8 29.3 10.4 858

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.6 16.5 42.8 28.4 12.3 236
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 20.9 58.1 14.0 7.0 43
..... CHASS 2.8 15.3 55.6 25.7 3.5 144
..... CNR 2.5 12.5 39.6 33.3 14.6 48
..... COE 2.5 8.2 49.3 29.9 12.7 134
..... COM 2.2 4.8 33.3 42.9 19.0 42
..... COT 3.0 26.9 50.0 23.1 . 26
..... CVM 2.6 14.8 37.7 39.3 8.2 61
..... Design 2.7 20.8 41.7 25.0 12.5 24
..... PAMS 2.6 15.1 40.9 32.3 11.8 93
..... Student Affairs 2.6 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 5
Back to Top

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 10.3 52.7 28.7 8.4 848

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)
2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.6 7.2 52.8 31.9 8.1 235
..... CALS
..... CED 2.7 11.6 60.5 18.6 9.3 43
..... CHASS 2.7 11.5 56.8 26.6 5.0 139
..... CNR 2.7 12.8 53.2 23.4 10.6 47
..... COE 2.6 7.6 55.3 28.8 8.3 132
..... COM 2.2 4.8 31.0 42.9 21.4 42
..... COT 3.0 23.1 53.8 23.1 . 26
..... CVM 2.7 16.1 46.8 32.3 4.8 62
..... Design 2.8 16.7 45.8 33.3 4.2 24
..... PAMS 2.6 11.0 52.7 24.2 12.1 91
..... Student Affairs 2.8 20.0 60.0 . 20.0 5
Back to Top

K4a: Satisfaction with office space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 34.5 46.5 14.0 5.0 858

K4a: Satisfaction with office space Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.1 35.9 44.3 12.7 7.2 237
..... CALS
..... CED 3.3 51.2 39.5 2.3 7.0 43
..... CHASS 2.9 24.5 46.2 22.4 7.0 143
..... CNR 3.0 27.1 50.0 18.8 4.2 48
..... COE 3.1 30.6 50.7 15.7 3.0 134
..... COM 3.4 36.6 63.4 . . 41
..... COT 3.4 53.8 34.6 7.7 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.3 46.8 40.3 9.7 3.2 62
..... Design 3.0 33.3 37.5 25.0 4.2 24
..... PAMS 3.1 33.3 50.5 12.9 3.2 93
..... Student Affairs 3.6 60.0 40.0 . . 5
Back to Top

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 20.4 48.2 20.2 11.1 514

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 23.9 48.4 15.8 12.0 184
..... CALS
..... CED 2.7 7.7 61.5 23.1 7.7 13
..... CHASS 2.4 9.1 39.4 30.3 21.2 33
..... CNR 2.6 14.8 40.7 29.6 14.8 27
..... COE 2.8 17.5 52.5 21.7 8.3 120
..... COM 3.0 . 100.0 . . 1
..... COT 2.9 29.2 45.8 12.5 12.5 24
..... CVM 2.9 25.0 46.2 25.0 3.8 52
..... Design 2.5 15.4 38.5 23.1 23.1 13
..... PAMS 2.9 23.3 48.8 18.6 9.3 43
..... Student Affairs 2.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 2
Back to Top

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 16.9 50.3 24.2 8.6 801

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 16.1 52.8 24.4 6.7 193
..... CALS
..... CED 2.4 4.8 45.2 33.3 16.7 42
..... CHASS 2.3 6.3 41.7 32.6 19.4 144
..... CNR 2.8 12.5 57.5 27.5 2.5 40
..... COE 3.1 28.6 52.6 15.0 3.8 133
..... COM 3.1 26.8 56.1 17.1 . 41
..... COT 3.6 68.0 28.0 4.0 . 25
..... CVM 3.0 17.7 64.5 16.1 1.6 62
..... Design 2.6 4.3 56.5 34.8 4.3 23
..... PAMS 2.5 8.8 46.2 30.8 14.3 91
..... Student Affairs 3.4 40.0 60.0 . . 5
Back to Top

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 20.5 50.0 22.6 6.9 376

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 20.9 45.2 20.9 13.0 115
..... CALS
..... CED 2.6 5.6 55.6 33.3 5.6 18
..... CHASS 2.8 10.0 60.0 30.0 . 20
..... CNR 2.8 10.5 63.2 26.3 . 19
..... COE 3.0 27.2 46.9 22.2 3.7 81
..... COM 2.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 2
..... COT 3.5 50.0 45.5 4.5 . 22
..... CVM 3.0 16.7 66.7 16.7 . 42
..... Design 2.4 5.6 44.4 33.3 16.7 18
..... PAMS 2.8 20.0 42.9 31.4 5.7 35
..... Student Affairs 2.0 . 50.0 . 50.0 2
Back to Top

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.5 10.2 46.7 26.9 16.2 854

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.4 12.7 37.3 28.8 21.2 236
..... CALS
..... CED 2.5 9.3 51.2 23.3 16.3 43
..... CHASS 2.4 4.9 48.6 30.3 16.2 142
..... CNR 2.6 6.3 60.4 18.8 14.6 48
..... COE 2.6 13.5 48.1 24.8 13.5 133
..... COM 2.7 4.9 68.3 22.0 4.9 41
..... COT 2.4 7.7 42.3 30.8 19.2 26
..... CVM 2.6 9.7 53.2 24.2 12.9 62
..... Design 2.8 12.5 58.3 25.0 4.2 24
..... PAMS 2.5 12.0 39.1 31.5 17.4 92
..... Student Affairs 3.2 20.0 80.0 . . 5
Back to Top

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.4 10.0 40.0 29.4 20.7 851

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.3 13.6 28.9 26.8 30.6 235
..... CALS
..... CED 2.4 4.7 41.9 39.5 14.0 43
..... CHASS 2.1 2.9 30.0 40.7 26.4 140
..... CNR 2.5 2.1 60.4 18.8 18.8 48
..... COE 2.7 16.5 47.4 21.1 15.0 133
..... COM 2.8 2.4 73.8 21.4 2.4 42
..... COT 2.6 12.0 52.0 20.0 16.0 25
..... CVM 2.5 12.9 41.9 30.6 14.5 62
..... Design 2.6 12.5 41.7 37.5 8.3 24
..... PAMS 2.4 9.8 38.0 35.9 16.3 92
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 10.7 53.2 26.6 9.5 842

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.5 7.3 53.8 25.2 13.7 234
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 16.7 57.1 21.4 4.8 42
..... CHASS 2.5 5.8 48.2 34.5 11.5 139
..... CNR 2.7 10.9 54.3 30.4 4.3 46
..... COE 2.6 9.7 51.5 30.6 8.2 134
..... COM 3.0 11.9 73.8 11.9 2.4 42
..... COT 3.1 32.0 52.0 12.0 4.0 25
..... CVM 2.8 16.1 56.5 22.6 4.8 62
..... Design 2.9 16.7 54.2 29.2 . 24
..... PAMS 2.6 13.8 47.1 25.3 13.8 87
..... Student Affairs 3.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.9 19.3 58.3 16.1 6.3 856

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 13.1 53.2 20.3 13.5 237
..... CALS
..... CED 3.2 27.9 62.8 9.3 . 43
..... CHASS 2.9 18.2 60.8 17.5 3.5 143
..... CNR 3.3 39.6 54.2 4.2 2.1 48
..... COE 2.9 12.7 68.7 17.2 1.5 134
..... COM 3.2 28.6 61.9 9.5 . 42
..... COT 3.6 57.7 42.3 . . 26
..... CVM 2.7 16.4 47.5 23.0 13.1 61
..... Design 2.8 8.3 66.7 20.8 4.2 24
..... PAMS 3.0 22.0 59.3 13.2 5.5 91
..... Student Affairs 3.2 20.0 80.0 . . 5
Back to Top

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 12.9 44.0 28.8 14.3 840

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 15.3 52.4 21.4 10.9 229
..... CALS
..... CED 2.0 2.3 25.6 41.9 30.2 43
..... CHASS 2.0 3.7 23.7 40.0 32.6 135
..... CNR 2.8 8.3 60.4 29.2 2.1 48
..... COE 2.8 14.9 58.2 21.6 5.2 134
..... COM 2.6 11.9 54.8 19.0 14.3 42
..... COT 3.3 42.3 50.0 3.8 3.8 26
..... CVM 2.6 14.5 37.1 38.7 9.7 62
..... Design 2.2 8.3 20.8 50.0 20.8 24
..... PAMS 2.5 15.6 36.7 34.4 13.3 90
..... Student Affairs 3.2 40.0 40.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.2 3.3 34.5 37.6 24.6 631

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.3 3.5 45.6 31.6 19.3 171
..... CALS
..... CED 2.5 6.3 46.9 34.4 12.5 32
..... CHASS 1.9 2.0 21.2 45.5 31.3 99
..... CNR 2.5 3.1 56.3 28.1 12.5 32
..... COE 2.0 1.8 26.3 39.5 32.5 114
..... COM 1.8 . 12.5 58.3 29.2 24
..... COT 1.8 . 25.0 29.2 45.8 24
..... CVM 2.4 5.7 42.9 34.3 17.1 35
..... Design 2.2 8.7 30.4 34.8 26.1 23
..... PAMS 2.2 5.6 29.2 43.1 22.2 72
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 3
Back to Top

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.4 6.1 47.9 26.5 19.5 835

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.3 5.7 42.8 27.5 24.0 229
..... CALS
..... CED 2.3 7.0 37.2 34.9 20.9 43
..... CHASS 2.4 10.4 41.5 25.2 23.0 135
..... CNR 1.8 . 20.8 39.6 39.6 48
..... COE 2.5 3.8 57.1 28.6 10.5 133
..... COM 2.8 12.8 61.5 15.4 10.3 39
..... COT 2.7 19.2 46.2 23.1 11.5 26
..... CVM 2.6 3.3 63.9 18.0 14.8 61
..... Design 2.7 . 79.2 8.3 12.5 24
..... PAMS 2.5 4.4 51.1 30.0 14.4 90
..... Student Affairs 2.2 . 60.0 . 40.0 5
Back to Top

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.0 2.5 29.8 36.9 30.9 833

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.0 2.6 26.3 35.5 35.5 228
..... CALS
..... CED 2.0 4.7 18.6 44.2 32.6 43
..... CHASS 1.9 2.2 27.6 32.1 38.1 134
..... CNR 1.6 . 14.6 33.3 52.1 48
..... COE 2.2 1.5 38.3 41.4 18.8 133
..... COM 2.5 10.0 42.5 35.0 12.5 40
..... COT 1.7 . 19.2 34.6 46.2 26
..... CVM 2.1 3.2 29.0 46.8 21.0 62
..... Design 2.2 . 33.3 50.0 16.7 24
..... PAMS 2.2 2.3 40.9 30.7 26.1 88
..... Student Affairs 1.8 . 20.0 40.0 40.0 5
Back to Top

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 8.5 64.9 19.2 7.4 271

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 9.5 65.5 14.3 10.7 84
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 . 91.7 8.3 . 12
..... CHASS 2.5 . 65.5 20.7 13.8 29
..... CNR 2.8 6.3 68.8 18.8 6.3 16
..... COE 2.8 11.1 63.0 18.5 7.4 54
..... COM 3.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 . 3
..... COT 2.4 . 45.5 45.5 9.1 11
..... CVM 3.0 21.1 63.2 10.5 5.3 19
..... Design 2.9 . 87.5 12.5 . 8
..... PAMS 2.8 9.1 60.6 30.3 . 33
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 1
Back to Top

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.3 5.3 43.7 30.8 20.3 419

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.3 4.2 38.3 36.7 20.8 120
..... CALS
..... CED 2.4 . 56.5 26.1 17.4 23
..... CHASS 2.5 4.2 62.5 12.5 20.8 24
..... CNR 2.5 4.5 63.6 9.1 22.7 22
..... COE 2.3 2.9 42.2 38.2 16.7 102
..... COM 2.5 7.7 46.2 30.8 15.4 13
..... COT 2.2 9.5 33.3 28.6 28.6 21
..... CVM 3.0 16.7 66.7 12.5 4.2 24
..... Design 2.5 . 70.0 10.0 20.0 10
..... PAMS 2.2 8.6 27.6 36.2 27.6 58
Back to Top

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 5.1 72.9 16.7 5.3 749

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 4.7 69.6 17.8 7.9 214
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 7.9 68.4 18.4 5.3 38
..... CHASS 2.7 2.6 69.3 21.9 6.1 114
..... CNR 2.8 6.5 76.1 13.0 4.3 46
..... COE 2.9 4.4 82.3 12.4 0.9 113
..... COM 2.8 5.3 73.7 13.2 7.9 38
..... COT 2.9 12.5 70.8 12.5 4.2 24
..... CVM 2.9 5.6 83.3 7.4 3.7 54
..... Design 2.5 4.5 45.5 45.5 4.5 22
..... PAMS 2.8 6.3 73.4 15.2 5.1 79
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 5
Back to Top

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.5 3.2 55.0 29.3 12.4 836

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.4 3.4 47.0 32.8 16.8 232
..... CALS
..... CED 2.4 . 53.5 34.9 11.6 43
..... CHASS 2.5 2.1 59.6 28.4 9.9 141
..... CNR 2.3 . 47.9 35.4 16.7 48
..... COE 2.5 3.1 56.6 28.7 11.6 129
..... COM 2.7 5.0 65.0 20.0 10.0 40
..... COT 2.9 11.5 76.9 3.8 7.7 26
..... CVM 2.7 3.4 72.9 13.6 10.2 59
..... Design 2.3 4.2 41.7 37.5 16.7 24
..... PAMS 2.5 4.6 50.6 37.9 6.9 87
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 6.7 73.4 14.1 5.8 830

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 5.2 67.2 17.5 10.0 229
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 11.9 69.0 11.9 7.1 42
..... CHASS 2.9 8.6 77.0 14.4 . 139
..... CNR 2.7 6.4 66.0 14.9 12.8 47
..... COE 2.8 4.6 77.7 13.8 3.8 130
..... COM 2.7 7.1 71.4 9.5 11.9 42
..... COT 3.1 11.5 84.6 3.8 . 26
..... CVM 2.9 6.8 79.7 10.2 3.4 59
..... Design 2.9 8.3 75.0 16.7 . 24
..... PAMS 2.9 7.1 76.5 12.9 3.5 85
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.5 4.2 50.8 31.4 13.7 841

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.3 3.0 45.7 32.1 19.2 234
..... CALS
..... CED 2.4 . 53.5 34.9 11.6 43
..... CHASS 2.5 5.0 48.2 34.8 12.1 141
..... CNR 2.0 4.3 27.7 34.0 34.0 47
..... COE 2.6 3.8 61.4 25.0 9.8 132
..... COM 2.5 4.9 51.2 34.1 9.8 41
..... COT 2.8 11.5 61.5 19.2 7.7 26
..... CVM 2.6 7.0 56.1 29.8 7.0 57
..... Design 2.5 4.2 50.0 41.7 4.2 24
..... PAMS 2.6 3.4 59.6 29.2 7.9 89
..... Student Affairs 2.4 20.0 . 80.0 . 5
Back to Top

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 4.6 55.0 32.8 7.6 629

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.5 4.9 50.8 35.7 8.6 185
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 9.7 64.5 19.4 6.5 31
..... CHASS 2.4 2.3 44.8 40.2 12.6 87
..... CNR 2.4 . 44.2 48.8 7.0 43
..... COE 2.8 8.7 64.1 22.3 4.9 103
..... COM 2.9 5.3 84.2 10.5 . 19
..... COT 2.8 . 81.8 13.6 4.5 22
..... CVM 2.4 2.2 42.2 44.4 11.1 45
..... Design 2.6 . 58.8 41.2 . 17
..... PAMS 2.6 5.6 58.3 29.2 6.9 72
..... Student Affairs 2.3 . 33.3 66.7 . 3
Back to Top

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 5.3 60.3 27.4 7.0 584

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.6 5.1 55.4 29.7 9.7 175
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 11.5 61.5 19.2 7.7 26
..... CHASS 2.4 2.6 47.4 39.7 10.3 78
..... CNR 2.5 . 51.2 43.9 4.9 41
..... COE 2.8 9.8 68.6 17.6 3.9 102
..... COM 3.1 11.1 83.3 5.6 . 18
..... COT 2.9 . 90.5 4.8 4.8 21
..... CVM 2.4 2.2 48.9 37.8 11.1 45
..... Design 2.5 . 53.8 38.5 7.7 13
..... PAMS 2.8 6.7 71.7 20.0 1.7 60
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 3
Back to Top

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.9 11.8 70.5 14.3 3.4 743

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.9 11.8 72.6 12.7 2.8 212
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 23.1 56.4 15.4 5.1 39
..... CHASS 2.7 6.9 67.2 19.0 6.9 116
..... CNR 2.8 6.7 66.7 26.7 . 45
..... COE 2.9 11.5 73.5 13.3 1.8 113
..... COM 3.2 18.5 81.5 . . 27
..... COT 2.8 8.0 72.0 12.0 8.0 25
..... CVM 2.9 13.8 69.0 15.5 1.7 58
..... Design 2.8 10.5 63.2 21.1 5.3 19
..... PAMS 3.0 15.9 72.0 8.5 3.7 82
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 4.7 57.1 29.3 8.9 617

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.5 5.2 55.5 27.7 11.5 191
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 12.1 63.6 18.2 6.1 33
..... CHASS 2.6 1.3 61.5 28.2 9.0 78
..... CNR 2.4 4.9 39.0 43.9 12.2 41
..... COE 2.7 5.0 61.0 30.0 4.0 100
..... COM 2.9 9.5 76.2 9.5 4.8 21
..... COT 2.5 5.0 45.0 40.0 10.0 20
..... CVM 2.4 2.2 50.0 34.8 13.0 46
..... Design 2.5 . 58.8 29.4 11.8 17
..... PAMS 2.6 4.8 58.7 31.7 4.8 63
..... Student Affairs 2.6 . 80.0 . 20.0 5
Back to Top

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.5 4.4 56.7 26.8 12.1 406

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.5 6.1 54.5 26.5 12.9 132
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 16.0 60.0 12.0 12.0 25
..... CHASS 2.4 . 47.8 41.3 10.9 46
..... CNR 2.1 . 31.0 44.8 24.1 29
..... COE 2.7 3.3 68.9 18.0 9.8 61
..... COM 3.1 8.3 91.7 . . 12
..... COT 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 10
..... CVM 2.4 . 56.3 28.1 15.6 32
..... Design 2.5 7.1 57.1 14.3 21.4 14
..... PAMS 2.7 5.0 62.5 25.0 7.5 40
..... Student Affairs 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
Back to Top

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 6.3 66.8 22.1 4.8 398

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 8.5 64.3 21.7 5.4 129
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 20.0 64.0 8.0 8.0 25
..... CHASS 2.6 . 66.7 28.6 4.8 42
..... CNR 2.6 3.3 53.3 40.0 3.3 30
..... COE 2.8 3.2 77.4 17.7 1.6 62
..... COM 3.1 14.3 85.7 . . 14
..... COT 2.6 . 69.2 23.1 7.7 13
..... CVM 2.6 3.4 55.2 34.5 6.9 29
..... Design 2.3 . 55.6 22.2 22.2 9
..... PAMS 2.9 7.3 73.2 17.1 2.4 41
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 2
Back to Top

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus

  Mean Rating 4: A lot
(%)
3: Some
(%)
2: A little
(%)
1: None at
all (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 30.2 26.2 19.3 24.2 854

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus Mean Rating 4: A lot
(%)
3: Some
(%)
2: A little
(%)
1: None at
all (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.6 30.2 24.3 21.3 24.3 235
..... CALS
..... CED 3.1 42.9 28.6 21.4 7.1 42
..... CHASS 2.1 11.8 23.6 25.0 39.6 144
..... CNR 2.6 31.3 29.2 12.5 27.1 48
..... COE 3.1 47.8 23.9 17.2 11.2 134
..... COM 2.4 24.4 29.3 7.3 39.0 41
..... COT 3.0 46.2 23.1 15.4 15.4 26
..... CVM 2.8 32.3 32.3 16.1 19.4 62
..... Design 2.2 16.7 20.8 29.2 33.3 24
..... PAMS 2.7 27.5 34.1 15.4 23.1 91
..... Student Affairs 3.0 40.0 20.0 40.0 . 5
Back to Top

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus

  Mean Rating 4: Very
likely (%)
3: Somewhat
likely (%)
2: Not very
likely (%)
1: Not at
all likely
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 31.1 34.0 21.4 13.5 854

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus Mean Rating 4: Very
likely (%)
3: Somewhat
likely (%)
2: Not very
likely (%)
1: Not at
all likely
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 32.8 31.9 21.3 14.0 235
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 34.9 34.9 27.9 2.3 43
..... CHASS 2.4 13.3 32.9 30.1 23.8 143
..... CNR 3.0 35.4 39.6 10.4 14.6 48
..... COE 3.3 48.9 35.3 9.0 6.8 133
..... COM 2.5 23.8 26.2 26.2 23.8 42
..... COT 3.2 42.3 42.3 11.5 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.0 35.5 32.3 24.2 8.1 62
..... Design 2.6 20.8 37.5 20.8 20.8 24
..... PAMS 2.8 27.5 35.2 26.4 11.0 91
..... Student Affairs 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
Back to top

Continue to Section L: Recreation/Wellness



For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section K only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page