North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

College Results
Tenure Track Faculty
(Tenured and Probationary)

The following tables provide results to questions in Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure, broken down by college for tenure track faculty only. For exact question wording for this section, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | College Results for all Faculty

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section H only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	33.4	45.6	16.2	4.8	862

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	29.7	42.8	22.0	5.5	236
..... CALS
..... CED	3.0	25.6	48.8	20.9	4.7	43
..... CHASS	3.2	40.7	46.2	10.3	2.8	145
..... CNR	3.0	27.1	50.0	16.7	6.3	48
..... COE	3.0	29.9	44.0	18.7	7.5	134
..... COM	3.1	30.2	55.8	7.0	7.0	43
..... COT	3.2	34.6	46.2	19.2	.	26
..... CVM	3.4	56.5	30.6	8.1	4.8	62
..... Design	3.0	34.8	34.8	21.7	8.7	23
..... PAMS	3.2	30.5	55.8	13.7	.	95
..... Student Affairs	3.2	20.0	80.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.2	37.6	49.8	9.7	3.0	860

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.2	35.6	51.7	10.6	2.1	236
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	34.9	44.2	14.0	7.0	43
..... CHASS	3.2	38.9	47.9	11.1	2.1	144
..... CNR	3.3	41.3	47.8	6.5	4.3	46
..... COE	3.2	34.1	51.1	11.1	3.7	135
..... COM	3.1	37.2	46.5	9.3	7.0	43
..... COT	3.3	30.8	65.4	3.8	.	26
..... CVM	3.5	56.5	37.1	3.2	3.2	62
..... Design	3.0	39.1	30.4	26.1	4.3	23
..... PAMS	3.3	34.7	58.9	5.3	1.1	95
..... Student Affairs	3.2	20.0	80.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.2	35.3	55.5	6.6	2.7	791

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.3	38.7	55.7	5.7	.	230
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	31.6	55.3	7.9	5.3	38
..... CHASS	3.3	39.0	52.0	7.3	1.6	123
..... CNR	3.2	37.8	51.1	4.4	6.7	45
..... COE	3.1	28.6	58.8	8.4	4.2	119
..... COM	3.0	29.3	48.8	12.2	9.8	41
..... COT	3.2	36.0	48.0	12.0	4.0	25
..... CVM	3.3	39.0	55.9	3.4	1.7	59
..... Design	3.1	33.3	50.0	12.5	4.2	24
..... PAMS	3.3	33.3	63.0	2.5	1.2	81
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	38.5	53.7	5.7	2.2	736

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.3	42.1	49.1	7.5	1.4	214
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	28.6	62.9	2.9	5.7	35
..... CHASS	3.4	44.0	50.0	6.0	.	116
..... CNR	3.3	39.0	51.2	7.3	2.4	41
..... COE	3.2	31.8	57.3	7.3	3.6	110
..... COM	3.3	29.7	70.3	.	.	37
..... COT	3.2	31.8	59.1	9.1	.	22
..... CVM	3.4	47.4	47.4	3.5	1.8	57
..... Design	3.0	42.9	33.3	9.5	14.3	21
..... PAMS	3.3	35.1	62.3	1.3	1.3	77
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	32.6	48.3	13.3	5.8	724

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.1	36.1	42.9	17.4	3.7	219
..... CALS
..... CED	2.9	26.3	47.4	15.8	10.5	38
..... CHASS	3.1	35.5	43.9	13.1	7.5	107
..... CNR	3.2	34.1	56.8	2.3	6.8	44
..... COE	2.9	23.8	52.4	16.2	7.6	105
..... COM	2.8	23.1	51.3	12.8	12.8	39
..... COT	3.2	26.3	63.2	10.5	.	19
..... CVM	3.3	46.6	43.1	8.6	1.7	58
..... Design	3.0	33.3	42.9	9.5	14.3	21
..... PAMS	3.2	27.9	61.8	8.8	1.5	68
..... Student Affairs	3.5	50.0	50.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.9	22.8	47.0	23.4	6.8	785

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	27.4	45.2	24.3	3.0	230
..... CALS
..... CED	2.7	17.1	46.3	26.8	9.8	41
..... CHASS	2.8	21.7	43.4	24.0	10.9	129
..... CNR	2.9	29.8	40.4	21.3	8.5	47
..... COE	2.8	20.9	47.0	26.1	6.1	115
..... COM	2.6	9.8	56.1	17.1	17.1	41
..... COT	2.7	15.8	42.1	42.1	.	19
..... CVM	3.1	32.2	50.8	11.9	5.1	59
..... Design	2.7	19.0	47.6	14.3	19.0	21
..... PAMS	2.8	15.8	55.3	26.3	2.6	76
..... Student Affairs	3.0	20.0	60.0	20.0	.	5

Back to Top

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.0	29.7	51.6	12.4	6.3	789

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.2	36.1	48.7	11.7	3.5	230
..... CALS
..... CED	2.8	19.5	53.7	14.6	12.2	41
..... CHASS	3.0	32.8	45.8	13.7	7.6	131
..... CNR	3.0	25.5	59.6	6.4	8.5	47
..... COE	2.9	19.5	55.8	18.6	6.2	113
..... COM	2.9	14.6	68.3	7.3	9.8	41
..... COT	3.0	25.0	45.0	30.0	.	20
..... CVM	3.3	45.9	41.0	6.6	6.6	61
..... Design	2.9	30.0	50.0	.	20.0	20
..... PAMS	3.1	24.4	60.3	12.8	2.6	78
..... Student Affairs	3.0	40.0	40.0	.	20.0	5

Back to Top

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.6	17.9	39.2	32.6	10.3	786

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.7	19.2	38.4	35.4	7.0	229
..... CALS
..... CED	2.4	12.2	34.1	39.0	14.6	41
..... CHASS	2.7	23.1	34.6	33.8	8.5	130
..... CNR	2.5	12.8	44.7	23.4	19.1	47
..... COE	2.6	15.7	40.0	33.0	11.3	115
..... COM	2.5	10.3	46.2	23.1	20.5	39
..... COT	2.5	15.8	26.3	52.6	5.3	19
..... CVM	2.8	26.2	36.1	27.9	9.8	61
..... Design	2.3	19.0	23.8	23.8	33.3	21
..... PAMS	2.8	14.3	53.2	28.6	3.9	77
..... Student Affairs	2.4	.	40.0	60.0	.	5

Back to Top

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.8	22.1	50.0	17.1	10.8	768

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.9	26.4	47.6	19.4	6.6	227
..... CALS
..... CED	2.7	19.5	48.8	14.6	17.1	41
..... CHASS	2.9	30.5	44.5	14.1	10.9	128
..... CNR	2.6	14.0	53.5	14.0	18.6	43
..... COE	2.7	11.8	57.3	17.3	13.6	110
..... COM	2.6	12.5	47.5	25.0	15.0	40
..... COT	2.8	27.8	33.3	27.8	11.1	18
..... CVM	3.0	28.3	50.0	11.7	10.0	60
..... Design	2.8	30.0	35.0	20.0	15.0	20
..... PAMS	2.9	14.7	64.0	14.7	6.7	75
..... Student Affairs	2.3	.	50.0	25.0	25.0	4

Back to Top

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy

	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.0	28.7	48.5	18.8	3.9	861

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	26.1	50.0	20.2	3.8	238
..... CALS
..... CED	3.0	37.2	32.6	27.9	2.3	43
..... CHASS	3.0	30.8	46.9	16.8	5.6	143
..... CNR	3.1	31.3	54.2	10.4	4.2	48
..... COE	3.0	27.6	46.3	21.6	4.5	134
..... COM	3.0	25.6	46.5	25.6	2.3	43
..... COT	3.5	50.0	46.2	3.8	.	26
..... CVM	3.2	34.4	49.2	16.4	.	61
..... Design	3.1	37.5	41.7	16.7	4.2	24
..... PAMS	2.9	20.2	55.3	18.1	6.4	94
..... Student Affairs	2.8	.	80.0	20.0	.	5

Back to Top

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate

	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	30.1	69.9	871

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	26.1	73.9	241
..... CALS
..... CED	41.9	58.1	43
..... CHASS	24.8	75.2	145
..... CNR	31.3	68.8	48
..... COE	36.5	63.5	137
..... COM	20.9	79.1	43
..... COT	23.1	76.9	26
..... CVM	27.4	72.6	62
..... Design	29.2	70.8	24
..... PAMS	40.0	60.0	95
..... Student Affairs	40.0	60.0	5

Back to Top

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter

	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	29.4	70.6	871

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	23.7	76.3	241
..... CALS
..... CED	37.2	62.8	43
..... CHASS	32.4	67.6	145
..... CNR	37.5	62.5	48
..... COE	33.6	66.4	137
..... COM	27.9	72.1	43
..... COT	30.8	69.2	26
..... CVM	25.8	74.2	62
..... Design	37.5	62.5	24
..... PAMS	26.3	73.7	95
..... Student Affairs	40.0	60.0	5

Back to Top

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member

	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	51.3	48.7	871

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	53.5	46.5	241
..... CALS
..... CED	51.2	48.8	43
..... CHASS	51.0	49.0	145
..... CNR	43.8	56.3	48
..... COE	58.4	41.6	137
..... COM	37.2	62.8	43
..... COT	46.2	53.8	26
..... CVM	48.4	51.6	62
..... Design	37.5	62.5	24
..... PAMS	56.8	43.2	95
..... Student Affairs	.	100.0	5

Back to Top

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process

	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	90.1	9.9	871

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	No (%)	Yes (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	90.5	9.5	241
..... CALS
..... CED	79.1	20.9	43
..... CHASS	91.0	9.0	145
..... CNR	89.6	10.4	48
..... COE	87.6	12.4	137
..... COM	90.7	9.3	43
..... COT	96.2	3.8	26
..... CVM	88.7	11.3	62
..... Design	95.8	4.2	24
..... PAMS	93.7	6.3	95
..... Student Affairs	100.0	.	5

Back to Top

H8: Understand dept RPT standards

	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	47.3	41.1	10.3	1.3	864

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.3	43.7	44.5	10.9	0.8	238
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	41.9	32.6	23.3	2.3	43
..... CHASS	3.5	53.5	41.7	4.2	0.7	144
..... CNR	3.2	37.5	43.8	16.7	2.1	48
..... COE	3.3	45.9	39.3	11.9	3.0	135
..... COM	3.5	55.8	39.5	2.3	2.3	43
..... COT	3.4	46.2	50.0	3.8	.	26
..... CVM	3.4	56.5	30.6	12.9	.	62
..... Design	3.3	41.7	45.8	12.5	.	24
..... PAMS	3.3	45.7	42.6	10.6	1.1	94
..... Student Affairs	3.8	80.0	20.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures

	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.4	51.5	40.5	7.4	0.6	862

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.4	50.8	41.9	6.8	0.4	236
..... CALS
..... CED	3.2	46.5	32.6	18.6	2.3	43
..... CHASS	3.5	54.5	40.0	4.8	0.7	145
..... CNR	3.3	47.9	37.5	14.6	.	48
..... COE	3.4	49.3	45.5	5.2	.	134
..... COM	3.3	46.5	44.2	7.0	2.3	43
..... COT	3.6	61.5	34.6	3.8	.	26
..... CVM	3.5	59.7	33.9	6.5	.	62
..... Design	3.2	45.8	29.2	20.8	4.2	24
..... PAMS	3.4	50.0	43.6	6.4	.	94
..... Student Affairs	3.6	60.0	40.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	34.2	43.9	15.0	6.8	774

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.2	41.7	40.3	15.0	2.9	206
..... CALS
..... CED	2.9	33.3	33.3	22.2	11.1	36
..... CHASS	2.9	27.7	44.5	21.2	6.6	137
..... CNR	2.8	23.1	48.7	17.9	10.3	39
..... COE	3.1	30.6	51.6	10.5	7.3	124
..... COM	2.8	35.7	31.0	14.3	19.0	42
..... COT	2.8	20.8	45.8	20.8	12.5	24
..... CVM	3.3	52.5	32.2	8.5	6.8	59
..... Design	3.0	38.9	38.9	5.6	16.7	18
..... PAMS	3.1	25.0	59.5	13.1	2.4	84
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.2	40.7	45.7	8.5	5.1	772

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.3	45.7	45.7	4.8	3.8	210
..... CALS
..... CED	3.3	45.7	45.7	2.9	5.7	35
..... CHASS	3.2	40.0	43.7	11.9	4.4	135
..... CNR	3.2	42.1	42.1	13.2	2.6	38
..... COE	3.2	34.4	52.8	8.0	4.8	125
..... COM	2.9	41.0	25.6	20.5	12.8	39
..... COT	3.1	29.2	58.3	4.2	8.3	24
..... CVM	3.4	51.7	39.7	3.4	5.2	58
..... Design	2.9	38.9	33.3	11.1	16.7	18
..... PAMS	3.1	30.6	54.1	12.9	2.4	85
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.7	10.5	56.8	27.1	5.7	791

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.7	12.4	53.7	27.4	6.5	201
..... CALS
..... CED	2.8	4.9	70.7	22.0	2.4	41
..... CHASS	2.6	7.2	53.2	33.1	6.5	139
..... CNR	2.8	15.2	54.3	26.1	4.3	46
..... COE	2.8	9.4	58.6	29.7	2.3	128
..... COM	2.7	7.5	60.0	25.0	7.5	40
..... COT	2.8	12.5	58.3	20.8	8.3	24
..... CVM	2.8	12.1	62.1	17.2	8.6	58
..... Design	2.7	13.0	52.2	30.4	4.3	23
..... PAMS	2.7	12.9	55.3	24.7	7.1	85
..... Student Affairs	2.8	.	80.0	20.0	.	5

Back to Top

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.6	8.7	52.5	31.1	7.6	733

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.7	11.2	52.2	30.2	6.3	205
..... CALS
..... CED	2.6	2.6	61.5	30.8	5.1	39
..... CHASS	2.5	5.6	43.7	42.1	8.7	126
..... CNR	2.7	13.6	54.5	22.7	9.1	44
..... COE	2.7	9.9	52.3	33.3	4.5	111
..... COM	2.5	9.1	51.5	24.2	15.2	33
..... COT	2.7	4.3	65.2	30.4	.	23
..... CVM	2.7	8.9	57.1	25.0	8.9	56
..... Design	2.6	10.0	50.0	25.0	15.0	20
..... PAMS	2.6	6.9	54.2	27.8	11.1	72
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	3

Back to Top

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.5	7.5	48.4	30.6	13.4	186

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.8	15.6	57.8	17.8	8.9	45
..... CALS
..... CED	2.5	7.1	50.0	28.6	14.3	14
..... CHASS	2.1	2.4	29.3	41.5	26.8	41
..... CNR	2.9	11.1	66.7	22.2	.	9
..... COE	2.6	.	65.2	26.1	8.7	23
..... COM	3.0	25.0	50.0	25.0	.	4
..... COT	2.3	.	28.6	71.4	.	7
..... CVM	2.7	16.7	50.0	16.7	16.7	6
..... Design	2.1	.	30.0	50.0	20.0	20
..... PAMS	2.8	14.3	57.1	21.4	7.1	14
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	2

Back to Top

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.6	9.1	53.9	26.1	10.8	471

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.7	10.8	55.4	24.5	9.4	139
..... CALS
..... CED	2.8	6.7	66.7	23.3	3.3	30
..... CHASS	2.7	12.0	50.0	38.0	.	50
..... CNR	2.5	7.1	57.1	17.9	17.9	28
..... COE	2.4	5.9	44.7	31.8	17.6	85
..... COM	2.6	12.5	50.0	25.0	12.5	24
..... COT	2.8	5.9	76.5	11.8	5.9	17
..... CVM	2.6	10.3	51.7	20.7	17.2	29
..... Design	2.6	9.5	52.4	23.8	14.3	21
..... PAMS	2.6	9.3	51.2	27.9	11.6	43
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.6	8.5	55.5	26.4	9.6	541

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.7	13.3	49.7	27.2	9.8	173
..... CALS
..... CED	2.7	8.8	58.8	26.5	5.9	34
..... CHASS	2.5	4.2	53.5	32.4	9.9	71
..... CNR	2.6	14.3	45.7	28.6	11.4	35
..... COE	2.5	1.2	57.3	31.7	9.8	82
..... COM	2.6	4.8	61.9	19.0	14.3	21
..... COT	2.9	5.0	80.0	15.0	.	20
..... CVM	2.7	4.9	65.9	22.0	7.3	41
..... Design	2.8	20.0	45.0	25.0	10.0	20
..... PAMS	2.6	7.7	61.5	15.4	15.4	39
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.6	8.0	49.0	33.1	9.9	700

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.6	11.4	50.0	29.0	9.5	210
..... CALS
..... CED	2.5	5.4	45.9	37.8	10.8	37
..... CHASS	2.4	3.7	42.1	40.2	14.0	107
..... CNR	2.6	16.3	39.5	32.6	11.6	43
..... COE	2.5	3.7	47.2	39.8	9.3	108
..... COM	2.5	3.2	51.6	35.5	9.7	31
..... COT	2.6	.	72.7	18.2	9.1	22
..... CVM	2.7	10.7	57.1	26.8	5.4	56
..... Design	2.4	5.9	41.2	41.2	11.8	17
..... PAMS	2.7	11.1	50.8	30.2	7.9	63
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.8	18.1	54.3	21.1	6.5	805

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	22.6	57.1	15.6	4.7	212
..... CALS
..... CED	2.8	16.7	52.4	26.2	4.8	42
..... CHASS	2.9	21.1	50.7	21.1	7.0	142
..... CNR	2.7	11.6	58.1	23.3	7.0	43
..... COE	2.7	11.3	53.2	26.6	8.9	124
..... COM	2.7	9.5	59.5	23.8	7.1	42
..... COT	3.0	30.4	47.8	13.0	8.7	23
..... CVM	2.9	22.6	50.0	22.6	4.8	62
..... Design	2.8	18.2	50.0	22.7	9.1	22
..... PAMS	2.8	15.1	55.8	22.1	7.0	86
..... Student Affairs	2.6	.	60.0	40.0	.	5

Back to Top

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.2	35.4	49.3	11.3	4.0	754

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.2	34.4	51.1	10.9	3.6	221
..... CALS
..... CED	3.2	40.0	42.5	15.0	2.5	40
..... CHASS	3.2	40.7	42.3	14.6	2.4	123
..... CNR	3.2	39.5	48.8	4.7	7.0	43
..... COE	3.0	27.4	53.0	12.8	6.8	117
..... COM	3.0	27.3	51.5	15.2	6.1	33
..... COT	3.1	28.6	52.4	19.0	.	21
..... CVM	3.5	55.0	40.0	3.3	1.7	60
..... Design	2.9	14.3	66.7	9.5	9.5	21
..... PAMS	3.2	35.2	53.5	9.9	1.4	71
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	2

Back to Top

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.7	19.7	47.6	20.2	12.5	208

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	24.5	57.1	12.2	6.1	49
..... CALS
..... CED	2.7	16.7	41.7	33.3	8.3	12
..... CHASS	2.7	23.2	35.7	25.0	16.1	56
..... CNR	2.6	.	62.5	37.5	.	8
..... COE	2.7	15.0	50.0	25.0	10.0	20
..... COM	2.7	16.7	50.0	16.7	16.7	6
..... COT	1.9	.	12.5	62.5	25.0	8
..... CVM	3.0	42.9	28.6	14.3	14.3	7
..... Design	3.0	22.7	63.6	4.5	9.1	22
..... PAMS	2.5	13.3	46.7	13.3	26.7	15
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	3

Back to Top

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.8	15.7	56.4	21.5	6.4	466

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	22.9	56.3	17.4	3.5	144
..... CALS
..... CED	2.8	14.3	47.6	38.1	.	21
..... CHASS	2.6	10.0	48.0	32.0	10.0	50
..... CNR	2.7	7.4	63.0	18.5	11.1	27
..... COE	2.7	8.2	58.8	25.9	7.1	85
..... COM	2.8	18.2	50.0	27.3	4.5	22
..... COT	2.9	17.6	64.7	5.9	11.8	17
..... CVM	2.9	22.9	51.4	20.0	5.7	35
..... Design	2.7	10.0	60.0	20.0	10.0	20
..... PAMS	2.8	15.4	61.5	15.4	7.7	39
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.8	16.9	56.0	18.7	8.3	614

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.1	25.8	61.1	9.5	3.7	190
..... CALS
..... CED	2.6	7.7	48.7	35.9	7.7	39
..... CHASS	2.5	6.6	49.5	27.5	16.5	91
..... CNR	2.8	13.5	56.8	21.6	8.1	37
..... COE	2.6	10.3	52.9	24.1	12.6	87
..... COM	2.5	13.0	39.1	30.4	17.4	23
..... COT	2.9	9.5	71.4	19.0	.	21
..... CVM	3.1	28.0	54.0	14.0	4.0	50
..... Design	2.9	19.0	57.1	19.0	4.8	21
..... PAMS	2.8	18.4	57.1	14.3	10.2	49
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

H13f: Department rewards professional service

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.7	12.3	56.5	24.0	7.2	741

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.8	15.3	59.7	19.4	5.6	216
..... CALS
..... CED	2.6	14.6	41.5	31.7	12.2	41
..... CHASS	2.6	7.8	56.5	27.0	8.7	115
..... CNR	2.7	14.0	48.8	25.6	11.6	43
..... COE	2.7	9.1	56.4	28.2	6.4	110
..... COM	2.5	8.6	45.7	34.3	11.4	35
..... COT	2.6	8.7	56.5	21.7	13.0	23
..... CVM	2.9	15.5	60.3	19.0	5.2	58
..... Design	2.8	14.3	57.1	19.0	9.5	21
..... PAMS	2.9	13.9	62.5	20.8	2.8	72
..... Student Affairs	2.8	.	80.0	20.0	.	5

Back to top

Continue to Section I: Post-Tenure Review

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section H only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page