North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

College Results
Tenure Track Faculty
(Tenured and Probationary)

The following tables provide results to questions in Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism, broken down by college for tenure track faculty only. For exact question wording for this section, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | College Results for all Faculty

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section E only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism

	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	49.6	38.1	9.4	2.9	893

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.3	45.1	42.3	11.4	1.2	246
..... CALS
..... CED	3.5	59.1	31.8	6.8	2.3	44
..... CHASS	3.5	58.8	32.4	7.4	1.4	148
..... CNR	3.3	45.1	41.2	11.8	2.0	51
..... COE	3.3	47.2	38.7	11.3	2.8	142
..... COM	2.8	25.6	41.9	16.3	16.3	43
..... COT	3.5	61.5	30.8	7.7	.	26
..... CVM	3.5	57.8	37.5	4.7	.	64
..... Design	3.7	76.0	20.0	4.0	.	25
..... PAMS	3.2	43.3	42.3	7.2	7.2	97
..... Student Affairs	3.8	80.0	20.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom

	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.0	31.4	39.8	22.0	6.9	860

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.8	25.8	40.7	24.4	9.0	221
..... CALS
..... CED	3.5	63.6	27.3	4.5	4.5	44
..... CHASS	3.3	48.3	36.1	15.0	0.7	147
..... CNR	2.9	31.1	31.1	31.1	6.7	45
..... COE	2.8	21.1	48.6	23.2	7.0	142
..... COM	2.4	16.3	34.9	25.6	23.3	43
..... COT	3.1	30.8	53.8	11.5	3.8	26
..... CVM	3.0	27.0	42.9	28.6	1.6	63
..... Design	3.7	70.8	29.2	.	.	24
..... PAMS	2.7	19.4	38.8	30.6	11.2	98
..... Student Affairs	3.2	40.0	40.0	20.0	.	5

Back to Top

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.9	12.8	65.9	18.5	2.8	756

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	14.9	68.2	16.4	0.5	201
..... CALS
..... CED	2.9	22.0	48.8	24.4	4.9	41
..... CHASS	2.7	4.0	64.5	26.6	4.8	124
..... CNR	2.8	8.5	70.2	17.0	4.3	47
..... COE	3.0	10.7	75.4	12.3	1.6	122
..... COM	3.0	17.9	66.7	10.3	5.1	39
..... COT	3.2	29.2	58.3	12.5	.	24
..... CVM	2.7	10.9	58.7	19.6	10.9	46
..... Design	2.6	13.0	34.8	47.8	4.3	23
..... PAMS	3.0	14.1	70.6	15.3	.	85
..... Student Affairs	3.0	33.3	33.3	33.3	.	3

Back to Top

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.0	27.0	51.1	17.1	4.8	771

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.9	23.4	51.7	17.6	7.3	205
..... CALS
..... CED	3.0	25.6	55.8	16.3	2.3	43
..... CHASS	2.8	17.6	52.1	25.2	5.0	119
..... CNR	3.2	31.9	57.4	6.4	4.3	47
..... COE	3.0	22.8	52.8	21.3	3.1	127
..... COM	2.9	22.6	58.1	9.7	9.7	31
..... COT	3.1	32.0	48.0	20.0	.	25
..... CVM	3.0	24.5	50.9	20.8	3.8	53
..... Design	2.9	37.5	29.2	20.8	12.5	24
..... PAMS	3.4	48.9	44.7	5.3	1.1	94
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	1

Back to Top

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.0	25.7	56.9	14.0	3.4	736

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	27.5	52.8	15.0	4.7	193
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	26.2	59.5	11.9	2.4	42
..... CHASS	2.9	16.4	62.1	17.2	4.3	116
..... CNR	3.1	22.7	65.9	9.1	2.3	44
..... COE	3.0	17.6	62.2	19.3	0.8	119
..... COM	2.9	22.6	54.8	12.9	9.7	31
..... COT	3.3	41.7	45.8	12.5	.	24
..... CVM	3.0	21.6	62.7	11.8	3.9	51
..... Design	3.1	36.0	44.0	12.0	8.0	25
..... PAMS	3.3	42.5	49.4	6.9	1.1	87
..... Student Affairs	3.0	.	100.0	.	.	2

Back to Top

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	26.6	56.8	12.8	3.7	732

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.1	28.1	56.1	11.7	4.1	196
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	28.6	59.5	9.5	2.4	42
..... CHASS	2.9	15.3	61.0	19.5	4.2	118
..... CNR	3.3	34.9	58.1	4.7	2.3	43
..... COE	3.0	19.3	62.2	17.6	0.8	119
..... COM	3.0	27.6	55.2	6.9	10.3	29
..... COT	3.2	41.7	41.7	12.5	4.2	24
..... CVM	2.9	22.0	58.0	12.0	8.0	50
..... Design	3.0	21.7	60.9	8.7	8.7	23
..... PAMS	3.3	43.4	45.8	9.6	1.2	83
..... Student Affairs	3.3	33.3	66.7	.	.	3

Back to Top

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.0	28.3	52.5	15.1	4.2	814

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.9	23.5	49.8	22.6	4.1	217
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	36.4	40.9	18.2	4.5	44
..... CHASS	3.1	32.6	53.5	7.6	6.3	144
..... CNR	3.2	26.5	65.3	6.1	2.0	49
..... COE	3.0	20.6	58.7	19.8	0.8	126
..... COM	2.9	27.8	47.2	16.7	8.3	36
..... COT	3.2	40.0	48.0	8.0	4.0	25
..... CVM	2.8	20.0	50.0	22.0	8.0	50
..... Design	3.0	33.3	45.8	12.5	8.3	24
..... PAMS	3.3	39.8	53.8	5.4	1.1	93
..... Student Affairs	2.8	25.0	50.0	.	25.0	4

Back to Top

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	29.2	52.7	13.4	4.8	733

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.0	26.7	53.9	14.7	4.7	191
..... CALS
..... CED	2.9	31.0	35.7	26.2	7.1	42
..... CHASS	3.0	28.5	51.5	13.8	6.2	130
..... CNR	3.2	27.9	65.1	2.3	4.7	43
..... COE	3.0	21.4	59.8	17.9	0.9	112
..... COM	3.1	34.3	51.4	5.7	8.6	35
..... COT	3.3	44.0	44.0	8.0	4.0	25
..... CVM	2.8	22.0	48.0	18.0	12.0	50
..... Design	3.2	39.1	43.5	13.0	4.3	23
..... PAMS	3.4	40.8	53.9	5.3	.	76
..... Student Affairs	3.0	50.0	25.0	.	25.0	4

Back to Top

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	31.7	51.5	12.7	4.2	719

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.1	31.6	52.8	11.4	4.1	193
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	35.0	42.5	20.0	2.5	40
..... CHASS	3.1	33.3	47.3	14.0	5.4	129
..... CNR	3.2	28.6	66.7	.	4.8	42
..... COE	3.0	21.5	62.6	15.0	0.9	107
..... COM	3.1	42.4	36.4	12.1	9.1	33
..... COT	3.3	50.0	37.5	8.3	4.2	24
..... CVM	2.8	18.8	52.1	18.8	10.4	48
..... Design	3.0	27.3	45.5	22.7	4.5	22
..... PAMS	3.3	41.3	49.3	9.3	.	75
..... Student Affairs	3.0	50.0	25.0	.	25.0	4

Back to Top

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.4	51.4	43.1	3.2	2.2	867

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.5	52.7	43.2	3.3	0.8	241
..... CALS
..... CED	3.5	59.1	36.4	2.3	2.3	44
..... CHASS	3.4	53.7	40.8	2.0	3.4	147
..... CNR	3.5	54.9	37.3	5.9	2.0	51
..... COE	3.4	44.8	50.7	2.2	2.2	134
..... COM	3.5	52.5	42.5	2.5	2.5	40
..... COT	3.2	30.8	57.7	11.5	.	26
..... CVM	3.5	55.0	41.7	3.3	.	60
..... Design	3.5	68.0	24.0	.	8.0	25
..... PAMS	3.3	46.7	44.6	4.3	4.3	92
..... Student Affairs	3.6	60.0	40.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.5	54.8	42.5	1.8	0.9	661

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.5	50.5	45.7	2.1	1.6	188
..... CALS
..... CED	3.6	65.7	31.4	2.9	.	35
..... CHASS	3.6	59.8	37.6	1.7	0.9	117
..... CNR	3.6	58.5	39.0	2.4	.	41
..... COE	3.5	50.0	49.0	1.0	.	104
..... COM	3.6	65.5	31.0	.	3.4	29
..... COT	3.5	50.0	50.0	.	.	14
..... CVM	3.5	57.4	38.3	2.1	2.1	47
..... Design	3.5	57.1	38.1	4.8	.	21
..... PAMS	3.5	50.0	48.3	1.7	.	60
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.4	50.9	42.4	4.7	2.0	865

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.4	51.0	42.7	5.0	1.2	241
..... CALS
..... CED	3.4	52.3	38.6	4.5	4.5	44
..... CHASS	3.4	53.7	35.4	5.4	5.4	147
..... CNR	3.5	54.0	42.0	.	4.0	50
..... COE	3.4	42.9	54.1	3.0	.	133
..... COM	3.4	56.8	32.4	8.1	2.7	37
..... COT	3.3	38.5	50.0	11.5	.	26
..... CVM	3.5	55.6	39.7	4.8	.	63
..... Design	3.6	68.0	24.0	4.0	4.0	25
..... PAMS	3.4	47.8	46.7	5.4	.	92
..... Student Affairs	3.6	60.0	40.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.5	53.6	42.5	2.8	1.2	504

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.5	49.7	49.0	1.3	.	153
..... CALS
..... CED	3.6	70.8	20.8	8.3	.	24
..... CHASS	3.5	59.4	34.4	4.7	1.6	64
..... CNR	3.4	52.5	40.0	5.0	2.5	40
..... COE	3.4	44.6	50.0	4.1	1.4	74
..... COM	3.5	63.6	31.8	.	4.5	22
..... COT	3.4	44.4	55.6	.	.	9
..... CVM	3.6	58.3	39.6	2.1	.	48
..... Design	3.3	50.0	35.7	7.1	7.1	14
..... PAMS	3.5	56.9	41.2	.	2.0	51
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.5	53.4	42.1	2.9	1.6	833

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.5	52.1	43.6	3.4	0.9	234
..... CALS
..... CED	3.5	53.8	41.0	5.1	.	39
..... CHASS	3.5	56.3	40.0	2.2	1.5	135
..... CNR	3.6	62.0	36.0	.	2.0	50
..... COE	3.4	45.7	48.1	4.7	1.6	129
..... COM	3.4	55.3	36.8	5.3	2.6	38
..... COT	3.5	50.0	46.2	3.8	.	26
..... CVM	3.5	58.3	38.3	.	3.3	60
..... Design	3.5	66.7	25.0	4.2	4.2	24
..... PAMS	3.5	52.2	45.7	.	2.2	92
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.4	52.2	42.0	3.7	2.1	849

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.5	50.4	45.8	3.0	0.8	236
..... CALS
..... CED	3.4	55.8	32.6	9.3	2.3	43
..... CHASS	3.5	56.3	38.2	2.8	2.8	144
..... CNR	3.5	56.9	39.2	.	3.9	51
..... COE	3.3	43.2	50.0	5.3	1.5	132
..... COM	3.4	57.9	28.9	10.5	2.6	38
..... COT	3.4	46.2	46.2	7.7	.	26
..... CVM	3.4	53.3	40.0	3.3	3.3	60
..... Design	3.5	70.8	16.7	4.2	8.3	24
..... PAMS	3.5	52.3	45.5	.	2.3	88
..... Student Affairs	3.6	60.0	40.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.4	51.9	42.6	3.8	1.7	744

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.3	45.6	46.0	6.0	2.3	215
..... CALS
..... CED	3.4	57.9	34.2	2.6	5.3	38
..... CHASS	3.6	60.7	37.7	1.6	.	122
..... CNR	3.5	54.5	45.5	.	.	44
..... COE	3.4	44.8	49.1	5.2	0.9	116
..... COM	3.5	62.9	28.6	2.9	5.7	35
..... COT	3.4	52.2	39.1	8.7	.	23
..... CVM	3.5	55.6	40.7	1.9	1.9	54
..... Design	3.5	60.0	30.0	5.0	5.0	20
..... PAMS	3.5	52.1	46.5	.	1.4	71
..... Student Affairs	3.6	60.0	40.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.4	52.3	41.0	4.0	2.7	597

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.4	46.7	46.1	6.0	1.2	167
..... CALS
..... CED	3.5	52.8	41.7	5.6	.	36
..... CHASS	3.5	60.7	30.3	4.1	4.9	122
..... CNR	3.4	50.0	42.5	2.5	5.0	40
..... COE	3.4	45.9	50.0	2.7	1.4	74
..... COM	3.4	50.0	41.7	4.2	4.2	24
..... COT	3.4	44.4	55.6	.	.	9
..... CVM	3.5	57.1	38.8	2.0	2.0	49
..... Design	3.6	66.7	28.6	.	4.8	21
..... PAMS	3.4	52.1	39.6	4.2	4.2	48
..... Student Affairs	3.6	60.0	40.0	.	.	5

Back to Top

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	62.8	34.2	2.1	0.8	842

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.6	63.6	32.2	3.3	0.8	239
..... CALS
..... CED	3.7	67.5	30.0	2.5	.	40
..... CHASS	3.7	68.8	29.1	2.1	.	141
..... CNR	3.5	60.4	35.4	2.1	2.1	48
..... COE	3.5	54.1	43.6	1.5	0.8	133
..... COM	3.5	59.0	38.5	.	2.6	39
..... COT	3.6	66.7	29.2	4.2	.	24
..... CVM	3.6	66.7	30.0	3.3	.	60
..... Design	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	24
..... PAMS	3.5	58.0	39.8	.	2.3	88
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	63.0	35.3	0.8	0.8	719

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.6	62.6	35.0	1.5	1.0	206
..... CALS
..... CED	3.7	73.5	26.5	.	.	34
..... CHASS	3.7	71.8	27.4	0.8	.	124
..... CNR	3.6	61.4	36.4	.	2.3	44
..... COE	3.5	51.7	46.6	0.9	0.9	116
..... COM	3.6	67.7	29.0	.	3.2	31
..... COT	3.6	62.5	37.5	.	.	16
..... CVM	3.6	65.4	32.7	1.9	.	52
..... Design	3.7	68.4	31.6	.	.	19
..... PAMS	3.5	57.7	40.8	.	1.4	71
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	62.6	35.0	1.4	1.0	839

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.6	63.4	34.0	1.7	0.8	238
..... CALS
..... CED	3.6	64.3	35.7	.	.	42
..... CHASS	3.6	68.6	27.9	2.1	1.4	140
..... CNR	3.6	62.5	35.4	.	2.1	48
..... COE	3.5	54.5	43.9	0.8	0.8	132
..... COM	3.6	63.2	34.2	.	2.6	38
..... COT	3.5	60.9	30.4	8.7	.	23
..... CVM	3.6	65.6	31.1	3.3	.	61
..... Design	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	24
..... PAMS	3.5	56.3	42.5	.	1.1	87
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	63.2	34.8	1.5	0.5	581

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.6	62.7	35.6	1.7	.	177
..... CALS
..... CED	3.7	73.9	26.1	.	.	23
..... CHASS	3.7	74.4	22.1	3.5	.	86
..... CNR	3.6	62.5	35.0	2.5	.	40
..... COE	3.5	51.1	46.6	1.1	1.1	88
..... COM	3.6	64.0	32.0	.	4.0	25
..... COT	3.7	66.7	33.3	.	.	9
..... CVM	3.6	66.0	32.1	1.9	.	53
..... Design	3.6	60.0	40.0	.	.	15
..... PAMS	3.6	59.3	39.0	.	1.7	59
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	62.5	34.5	1.8	1.2	824

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.6	62.7	33.0	3.4	0.9	233
..... CALS
..... CED	3.6	63.4	34.1	2.4	.	41
..... CHASS	3.7	71.9	25.2	2.2	0.7	135
..... CNR	3.6	60.4	37.5	.	2.1	48
..... COE	3.5	52.3	44.6	1.5	1.5	130
..... COM	3.6	64.1	33.3	.	2.6	39
..... COT	3.6	63.6	36.4	.	.	22
..... CVM	3.6	65.0	31.7	1.7	1.7	60
..... Design	3.7	73.9	26.1	.	.	23
..... PAMS	3.5	57.5	40.2	.	2.3	87
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	62.2	35.2	1.3	1.2	826

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.6	63.5	33.9	2.1	0.4	233
..... CALS
..... CED	3.6	61.9	38.1	.	.	42
..... CHASS	3.6	68.3	28.8	1.4	1.4	139
..... CNR	3.6	61.7	36.2	.	2.1	47
..... COE	3.5	52.7	44.3	1.5	1.5	131
..... COM	3.6	64.1	33.3	.	2.6	39
..... COT	3.7	72.7	27.3	.	.	22
..... CVM	3.5	61.0	33.9	3.4	1.7	59
..... Design	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	24
..... PAMS	3.5	57.1	40.5	.	2.4	84
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	61.1	35.0	2.8	1.0	777

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.5	58.7	33.8	6.2	1.3	225
..... CALS
..... CED	3.6	65.7	31.4	2.9	.	35
..... CHASS	3.7	69.5	29.0	0.8	0.8	131
..... CNR	3.6	56.1	43.9	.	.	41
..... COE	3.5	54.4	42.4	2.4	0.8	125
..... COM	3.6	65.8	31.6	.	2.6	38
..... COT	3.6	65.2	26.1	8.7	.	23
..... CVM	3.6	64.3	32.1	1.8	1.8	56
..... Design	3.7	68.4	31.6	.	.	19
..... PAMS	3.6	57.7	41.0	.	1.3	78
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.5	60.9	33.7	3.5	1.9	624

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.5	59.0	33.7	6.2	1.1	178
..... CALS
..... CED	3.6	65.6	28.1	6.3	.	32
..... CHASS	3.7	72.4	24.4	1.6	1.6	123
..... CNR	3.4	57.5	32.5	5.0	5.0	40
..... COE	3.4	45.1	51.2	1.2	2.4	82
..... COM	3.5	61.5	34.6	.	3.8	26
..... COT	3.6	57.1	42.9	.	.	7
..... CVM	3.6	62.3	34.0	1.9	1.9	53
..... Design	3.7	70.0	30.0	.	.	20
..... PAMS	3.5	58.6	32.8	5.2	3.4	58
..... Student Affairs	3.8	75.0	25.0	.	.	4

Back to Top

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.7	22.1	42.4	21.5	14.0	860

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.6	18.8	40.6	25.2	15.4	234
..... CALS
..... CED	3.0	27.9	51.2	16.3	4.7	43
..... CHASS	3.1	33.3	44.4	16.7	5.6	144
..... CNR	2.9	24.0	46.0	22.0	8.0	50
..... COE	2.6	15.6	42.2	25.2	17.0	135
..... COM	2.1	5.0	32.5	25.0	37.5	40
..... COT	3.0	30.8	46.2	11.5	11.5	26
..... CVM	2.7	14.8	50.8	26.2	8.2	61
..... Design	3.2	50.0	25.0	20.8	4.2	24
..... PAMS	2.6	19.8	42.7	14.6	22.9	96
..... Student Affairs	2.8	40.0	20.0	20.0	20.0	5

Back to Top

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.3	16.6	27.5	20.3	35.6	789

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.0	7.5	28.9	21.9	41.7	187
..... CALS
..... CED	3.3	44.2	46.5	7.0	2.3	43
..... CHASS	3.3	46.6	35.6	14.4	3.4	146
..... CNR	2.1	12.2	24.4	26.8	36.6	41
..... COE	1.7	2.4	20.0	21.6	56.0	125
..... COM	1.8	4.8	16.7	35.7	42.9	42
..... COT	2.1	8.3	29.2	29.2	33.3	24
..... CVM	1.7	6.3	17.5	15.9	60.3	63
..... Design	3.3	37.5	54.2	8.3	.	24
..... PAMS	1.8	4.5	19.3	25.0	51.1	88
..... Student Affairs	1.8	.	25.0	25.0	50.0	4

Back to Top

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.2	47.6	31.4	11.3	9.7	888

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	3.1	43.4	34.4	13.9	8.2	244
..... CALS
..... CED	3.1	38.6	40.9	13.6	6.8	44
..... CHASS	3.2	55.1	23.1	10.2	11.6	147
..... CNR	3.4	54.9	33.3	5.9	5.9	51
..... COE	3.3	51.1	34.0	6.4	8.5	141
..... COM	3.0	40.5	28.6	19.0	11.9	42
..... COT	3.5	57.7	34.6	7.7	.	26
..... CVM	3.0	40.6	31.3	14.1	14.1	64
..... Design	3.4	60.0	20.0	16.0	4.0	25
..... PAMS	3.1	45.4	30.9	10.3	13.4	97
..... Student Affairs	2.4	20.0	40.0	.	40.0	5

Back to Top

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.5	24.4	30.6	19.6	25.4	886

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.3	18.6	27.3	21.1	33.1	242
..... CALS
..... CED	2.7	29.5	31.8	20.5	18.2	44
..... CHASS	2.6	24.5	32.0	25.9	17.7	147
..... CNR	2.8	35.3	33.3	9.8	21.6	51
..... COE	2.6	21.3	36.9	17.7	24.1	141
..... COM	2.8	33.3	33.3	11.9	21.4	42
..... COT	3.1	50.0	19.2	23.1	7.7	26
..... CVM	2.4	21.9	29.7	18.8	29.7	64
..... Design	3.2	44.0	32.0	20.0	4.0	25
..... PAMS	2.4	20.6	28.9	18.6	32.0	97
..... Student Affairs	2.0	20.0	20.0	.	60.0	5

Back to Top

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.8	6.9	19.8	20.3	53.0	881

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	1.9	7.8	21.0	19.8	51.4	243
..... CALS
..... CED	2.0	9.1	18.2	34.1	38.6	44
..... CHASS	1.7	7.6	15.9	20.0	56.6	145
..... CNR	2.1	13.7	21.6	21.6	43.1	51
..... COE	1.9	4.3	26.2	22.7	46.8	141
..... COM	1.6	4.8	16.7	14.3	64.3	42
..... COT	2.0	15.4	19.2	11.5	53.8	26
..... CVM	1.7	4.8	17.7	21.0	56.5	62
..... Design	1.7	.	24.0	20.0	56.0	25
..... PAMS	1.5	4.2	12.6	16.8	66.3	95
..... Student Affairs	2.4	.	60.0	20.0	20.0	5

Back to Top

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.4	17.6	29.6	24.5	28.3	882

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.4	16.9	32.1	26.3	24.7	243
..... CALS
..... CED	2.6	27.3	25.0	29.5	18.2	44
..... CHASS	2.2	14.3	23.8	29.3	32.7	147
..... CNR	2.6	29.4	25.5	19.6	25.5	51
..... COE	2.4	19.9	29.8	20.6	29.8	141
..... COM	2.0	9.5	21.4	26.2	42.9	42
..... COT	2.7	23.1	38.5	26.9	11.5	26
..... CVM	2.5	19.4	37.1	22.6	21.0	62
..... Design	2.5	12.0	48.0	16.0	24.0	25
..... PAMS	2.1	12.8	27.7	21.3	38.3	94
..... Student Affairs	2.6	20.0	40.0	20.0	20.0	5

Back to Top

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.9	10.2	18.4	18.7	52.7	882

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	1.7	5.8	16.9	19.0	58.3	242
..... CALS
..... CED	1.8	11.4	15.9	15.9	56.8	44
..... CHASS	2.2	21.8	16.3	21.8	40.1	147
..... CNR	2.1	19.6	17.6	19.6	43.1	51
..... COE	1.9	11.3	21.3	15.6	51.8	141
..... COM	1.7	4.8	21.4	14.3	59.5	42
..... COT	1.9	8.0	24.0	20.0	48.0	25
..... CVM	1.7	6.3	15.9	20.6	57.1	63
..... Design	2.1	8.0	28.0	32.0	32.0	25
..... PAMS	1.6	3.2	17.9	16.8	62.1	95
..... Student Affairs	1.8	.	40.0	.	60.0	5

Back to Top

E9f: Interest in advising international students

	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.7	27.3	34.7	18.2	19.9	880

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Mean Rating	4: A great deal (%)	3: Some (%)	2: A little (%)	1: None (%)	Total (N)
College of appointment	2.8	30.6	35.5	16.1	17.8	242
..... CALS
..... CED	2.7	18.6	46.5	18.6	16.3	43
..... CHASS	2.2	15.8	21.9	30.1	32.2	146
..... CNR	2.9	31.4	43.1	13.7	11.8	51
..... COE	3.2	44.7	38.3	7.8	9.2	141
..... COM	2.0	7.3	24.4	34.1	34.1	41
..... COT	3.3	42.3	46.2	11.5	.	26
..... CVM	2.4	22.2	27.0	22.2	28.6	63
..... Design	2.5	29.2	25.0	16.7	29.2	24
..... PAMS	2.7	20.8	44.8	16.7	17.7	96
..... Student Affairs	1.8	.	40.0	.	60.0	5

Back to top

Continue to Section F: Working Relationships

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section E only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page