NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

Tables of Results
by College


The following tables provide results to questions in Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism, broken down by college. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between colleges are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here .

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section E by Academic Profile | Section E by Demographic Profile


E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 52.0 37.1 8.5 2.5 1085

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.3 46.0 41.9 11.0 1.1 272
..... CED 3.5 59.6 32.7 5.8 1.9 52
..... CHASS 3.6 63.4 30.4 5.4 0.9 224
..... CNR 3.3 48.3 37.9 10.3 3.4 58
..... COE 3.3 48.1 38.3 11.0 2.6 154
..... COM 2.9 30.2 43.4 13.2 13.2 53
..... COT 3.6 63.0 29.6 7.4 . 27
..... CVM 3.5 52.1 41.1 6.8 . 73
..... Design 3.7 76.0 20.0 4.0 . 25
..... FYC 3.4 71.4 14.3 . 14.3 7
..... PAMS 3.3 46.8 38.7 8.1 6.3 111
..... Student Affairs 3.6 58.6 41.4 . . 29
Back to top


E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom

  Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 34.7 38.8 20.4 6.1 1040

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Very
important (%)
3: Somewhat
important (%)
2: Not very
important (%)
1: Not at
all important (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.9 26.9 40.1 24.8 8.3 242
..... CED 3.5 63.5 26.9 5.8 3.8 52
..... CHASS 3.4 53.4 35.0 11.2 0.4 223
..... CNR 2.9 35.3 29.4 27.5 7.8 51
..... COE 2.9 22.4 48.0 23.0 6.6 152
..... COM 2.6 18.9 39.6 22.6 18.9 53
..... COT 3.1 30.8 53.8 11.5 3.8 26
..... CVM 2.9 23.9 40.8 32.4 2.8 71
..... Design 3.7 70.8 29.2 . . 24
..... FYC 3.6 71.4 14.3 14.3 . 7
..... PAMS 2.7 19.1 40.9 29.1 10.9 110
..... Student Affairs 3.3 48.3 34.5 13.8 3.4 29
Back to top


E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 13.5 65.8 18.3 2.4 924

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 15.1 68.0 16.4 0.4 225
..... CED 2.9 22.4 46.9 26.5 4.1 49
..... CHASS 2.8 9.5 63.0 24.3 3.2 189
..... CNR 2.8 7.5 69.8 18.9 3.8 53
..... COE 2.9 10.4 74.6 13.4 1.5 134
..... COM 2.9 14.6 68.8 10.4 6.3 48
..... COT 3.2 28.0 60.0 12.0 . 25
..... CVM 2.8 11.3 62.3 17.0 9.4 53
..... Design 2.6 13.0 34.8 47.8 4.3 23
..... FYC 2.8 33.3 16.7 50.0 . 6
..... PAMS 3.0 13.4 73.2 13.4 . 97
..... Student Affairs 3.2 27.3 68.2 4.5 . 22
Back to top


E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 26.2 50.8 18.0 5.0 894

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.9 23.6 52.0 17.3 7.1 225
..... CED 3.0 25.0 54.2 18.8 2.1 48
..... CHASS 2.8 17.6 50.3 27.7 4.4 159
..... CNR 3.2 30.8 57.7 7.7 3.8 52
..... COE 2.9 21.2 52.6 22.6 3.6 137
..... COM 3.0 26.3 52.6 13.2 7.9 38
..... COT 3.1 30.8 50.0 19.2 . 26
..... CVM 3.0 23.3 53.3 20.0 3.3 60
..... Design 2.9 37.5 29.2 20.8 12.5 24
..... FYC 3.6 60.0 40.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.4 49.0 45.2 4.8 1.0 104
..... Student Affairs 2.3 6.3 50.0 12.5 31.3 16
Back to top


E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 24.7 56.2 15.4 3.7 849

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 27.5 52.6 15.2 4.7 211
..... CED 3.1 25.0 58.3 14.6 2.1 48
..... CHASS 2.9 16.3 58.2 21.6 3.9 153
..... CNR 3.1 23.4 66.0 8.5 2.1 47
..... COE 2.9 17.1 60.5 20.9 1.6 129
..... COM 2.8 19.4 52.8 19.4 8.3 36
..... COT 3.3 40.0 48.0 12.0 . 25
..... CVM 3.0 19.0 65.5 12.1 3.4 58
..... Design 3.1 36.0 44.0 12.0 8.0 25
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.3 41.8 51.0 6.1 1.0 98
..... Student Affairs 2.5 7.7 53.8 15.4 23.1 13
Back to top


E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 25.8 57.0 13.5 3.7 849

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.1 28.0 56.5 11.2 4.2 214
..... CED 3.1 27.7 59.6 10.6 2.1 47
..... CHASS 2.9 14.6 60.8 20.9 3.8 158
..... CNR 3.2 34.8 56.5 6.5 2.2 46
..... COE 3.0 17.7 62.3 19.2 0.8 130
..... COM 3.0 25.7 54.3 11.4 8.6 35
..... COT 3.2 44.0 40.0 12.0 4.0 25
..... CVM 2.9 19.6 62.5 10.7 7.1 56
..... Design 3.0 21.7 60.9 8.7 8.7 23
..... FYC 3.7 71.4 28.6 . . 7
..... PAMS 3.3 43.0 47.3 8.6 1.1 93
..... Student Affairs 2.8 20.0 53.3 13.3 13.3 15
Back to top


E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 27.1 53.2 15.9 3.9 950

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.9 22.9 50.0 23.3 3.8 236
..... CED 3.1 34.7 40.8 20.4 4.1 49
..... CHASS 3.1 29.4 56.3 9.1 5.1 197
..... CNR 3.2 26.4 64.2 7.5 1.9 53
..... COE 3.0 20.3 58.6 20.3 0.8 133
..... COM 3.0 27.9 48.8 16.3 7.0 43
..... COT 3.2 38.5 50.0 7.7 3.8 26
..... CVM 2.8 18.9 49.1 24.5 7.5 53
..... Design 3.0 33.3 45.8 12.5 8.3 24
..... FYC 3.3 33.3 66.7 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.3 40.6 52.8 5.7 0.9 106
..... Student Affairs 2.6 8.3 54.2 25.0 12.5 24
Back to top


E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 27.6 52.9 15.0 4.5 860

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.0 26.9 52.9 15.9 4.3 208
..... CED 2.9 29.2 33.3 31.3 6.3 48
..... CHASS 3.0 25.6 51.7 17.0 5.7 176
..... CNR 3.2 27.7 66.0 2.1 4.3 47
..... COE 3.0 21.2 58.5 19.5 0.8 118
..... COM 3.1 32.6 53.5 7.0 7.0 43
..... COT 3.3 42.3 46.2 7.7 3.8 26
..... CVM 2.8 20.4 48.1 20.4 11.1 54
..... Design 3.2 39.1 43.5 13.0 4.3 23
..... FYC 3.2 16.7 83.3 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.3 40.7 52.3 5.8 1.2 86
..... Student Affairs 2.8 12.0 68.0 12.0 8.0 25
Back to top


E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 29.7 52.9 13.2 4.2 839

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.1 31.3 52.6 11.8 4.3 211
..... CED 3.1 33.3 44.4 20.0 2.2 45
..... CHASS 3.0 28.1 51.5 15.2 5.3 171
..... CNR 3.2 28.3 65.2 2.2 4.3 46
..... COE 3.0 21.2 61.9 15.9 0.9 113
..... COM 3.2 40.0 42.5 10.0 7.5 40
..... COT 3.3 48.0 40.0 8.0 4.0 25
..... CVM 2.8 17.3 53.8 19.2 9.6 52
..... Design 3.0 27.3 45.5 22.7 4.5 22
..... FYC 3.3 33.3 66.7 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.3 40.0 50.6 9.4 . 85
..... Student Affairs 2.8 17.4 56.5 13.0 13.0 23
Back to top


E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 49.8 44.7 3.1 2.4 1050

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 53.6 42.3 3.0 1.1 267
..... CED 3.5 55.8 40.4 1.9 1.9 52
..... CHASS 3.4 48.2 46.4 2.7 2.7 220
..... CNR 3.5 56.1 36.8 5.3 1.8 57
..... COE 3.4 42.8 52.4 2.1 2.8 145
..... COM 3.4 46.9 46.9 2.0 4.1 49
..... COT 3.2 29.6 59.3 11.1 . 27
..... CVM 3.5 55.9 41.2 2.9 . 68
..... Design 3.5 68.0 24.0 . 8.0 25
..... FYC 3.4 57.1 28.6 14.3 . 7
..... PAMS 3.4 48.1 44.2 3.8 3.8 104
..... Student Affairs 3.2 37.9 51.7 3.4 6.9 29
Back to top


E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.5 52.8 44.3 1.8 1.1 815

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 50.7 45.9 1.9 1.4 209
..... CED 3.6 63.4 34.1 2.4 . 41
..... CHASS 3.5 52.4 44.9 2.2 0.5 185
..... CNR 3.6 60.0 37.8 2.2 . 45
..... COE 3.5 48.2 50.0 0.9 0.9 112
..... COM 3.5 62.2 32.4 . 5.4 37
..... COT 3.5 53.3 46.7 . . 15
..... CVM 3.5 53.7 42.6 1.9 1.9 54
..... Design 3.5 57.1 38.1 4.8 . 21
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.5 52.2 46.3 1.5 . 67
..... Student Affairs 3.3 43.5 47.8 4.3 4.3 23
Back to top


E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 48.9 43.7 5.7 1.7 1050

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 52.8 41.2 4.9 1.1 267
..... CED 3.4 50.0 42.3 3.8 3.8 52
..... CHASS 3.3 45.9 43.7 6.3 4.1 222
..... CNR 3.5 55.4 39.3 1.8 3.6 56
..... COE 3.4 41.3 55.2 3.5 . 143
..... COM 3.3 51.1 34.0 12.8 2.1 47
..... COT 3.3 37.0 51.9 11.1 . 27
..... CVM 3.5 56.3 39.4 4.2 . 71
..... Design 3.6 68.0 24.0 4.0 4.0 25
..... FYC 3.6 57.1 42.9 . . 7
..... PAMS 3.4 48.1 44.2 7.7 . 104
..... Student Affairs 3.2 31.0 55.2 13.8 . 29
Back to top


E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.5 52.2 43.8 2.6 1.3 607

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 52.4 46.5 1.2 . 170
..... CED 3.6 66.7 26.7 6.7 . 30
..... CHASS 3.4 51.5 42.6 5.0 1.0 101
..... CNR 3.4 53.5 39.5 4.7 2.3 43
..... COE 3.4 43.8 51.3 3.8 1.3 80
..... COM 3.5 59.3 37.0 . 3.7 27
..... COT 3.4 44.4 55.6 . . 9
..... CVM 3.6 57.4 40.7 1.9 . 54
..... Design 3.3 50.0 35.7 7.1 7.1 14
..... FYC 3.4 40.0 60.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.5 54.5 41.8 . 3.6 55
..... Student Affairs 3.3 42.1 52.6 . 5.3 19
Back to top


E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.5 51.8 43.9 2.9 1.4 1002

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 53.3 42.9 3.1 0.8 259
..... CED 3.5 52.2 43.5 4.3 . 46
..... CHASS 3.5 50.5 46.1 2.5 1.0 204
..... CNR 3.6 61.1 37.0 . 1.9 54
..... COE 3.4 43.9 49.6 4.3 2.2 139
..... COM 3.4 48.9 44.7 4.3 2.1 47
..... COT 3.4 48.1 48.1 3.7 . 27
..... CVM 3.5 58.8 38.2 . 2.9 68
..... Design 3.5 66.7 25.0 4.2 4.2 24
..... FYC 3.3 42.9 42.9 14.3 . 7
..... PAMS 3.5 54.4 43.7 . 1.9 103
..... Student Affairs 3.3 37.5 50.0 12.5 . 24
Back to top


E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 50.1 44.1 3.8 2.0 1025

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 51.5 45.0 2.7 0.8 262
..... CED 3.4 52.9 37.3 7.8 2.0 51
..... CHASS 3.4 50.0 43.9 3.7 2.3 214
..... CNR 3.5 54.4 40.4 1.8 3.5 57
..... COE 3.3 41.8 51.8 5.0 1.4 141
..... COM 3.4 50.0 39.6 8.3 2.1 48
..... COT 3.4 44.4 48.1 7.4 . 27
..... CVM 3.4 53.7 40.3 3.0 3.0 67
..... Design 3.5 70.8 16.7 4.2 8.3 24
..... FYC 3.6 57.1 42.9 . . 7
..... PAMS 3.5 53.5 44.4 . 2.0 99
..... Student Affairs 3.1 32.1 53.6 10.7 3.6 28
Back to top


E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 49.7 45.3 3.5 1.6 890

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.4 46.0 45.6 5.9 2.5 237
..... CED 3.4 54.3 37.0 4.3 4.3 46
..... CHASS 3.5 51.9 47.0 1.1 . 183
..... CNR 3.5 54.2 45.8 . . 48
..... COE 3.4 43.5 50.8 4.8 0.8 124
..... COM 3.5 57.1 35.7 2.4 4.8 42
..... COT 3.4 50.0 41.7 8.3 . 24
..... CVM 3.5 54.1 42.6 1.6 1.6 61
..... Design 3.5 60.0 30.0 5.0 5.0 20
..... FYC 3.2 33.3 50.0 16.7 . 6
..... PAMS 3.5 53.2 45.6 . 1.3 79
..... Student Affairs 3.4 40.0 55.0 5.0 . 20
Back to top


E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 50.6 42.6 4.2 2.6 721

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.4 48.1 44.8 6.0 1.1 183
..... CED 3.5 52.4 42.9 4.8 . 42
..... CHASS 3.4 52.5 39.1 3.9 4.5 179
..... CNR 3.4 51.2 41.9 2.3 4.7 43
..... COE 3.4 46.2 50.0 2.6 1.3 78
..... COM 3.3 48.3 37.9 6.9 6.9 29
..... COT 3.4 40.0 60.0 . . 10
..... CVM 3.5 56.1 40.4 1.8 1.8 57
..... Design 3.6 66.7 28.6 . 4.8 21
..... FYC 3.4 42.9 57.1 . . 7
..... PAMS 3.4 52.8 37.7 5.7 3.8 53
..... Student Affairs 3.4 42.1 52.6 5.3 . 19
Back to top


E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 61.8 35.1 2.2 1.0 1007

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 64.8 31.4 3.0 0.8 264
..... CED 3.6 66.0 31.9 2.1 . 47
..... CHASS 3.6 64.8 31.6 2.0 1.5 196
..... CNR 3.5 60.0 34.5 3.6 1.8 55
..... COE 3.5 52.4 45.5 1.4 0.7 145
..... COM 3.5 55.1 42.9 . 2.0 49
..... COT 3.6 64.0 32.0 4.0 . 25
..... CVM 3.6 66.7 30.4 2.9 . 69
..... Design 3.8 75.0 25.0 . . 24
..... FYC 3.3 50.0 33.3 16.7 . 6
..... PAMS 3.6 60.4 37.6 . 2.0 101
..... Student Affairs 3.5 50.0 46.2 3.8 . 26
Back to top


E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 61.9 36.1 1.0 0.9 867

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 63.3 34.5 1.3 0.9 229
..... CED 3.7 70.7 29.3 . . 41
..... CHASS 3.6 67.6 29.6 1.7 1.1 179
..... CNR 3.6 61.2 34.7 2.0 2.0 49
..... COE 3.5 51.2 47.2 0.8 0.8 125
..... COM 3.6 61.5 35.9 . 2.6 39
..... COT 3.6 58.8 41.2 . . 17
..... CVM 3.6 65.0 33.3 1.7 . 60
..... Design 3.7 68.4 31.6 . . 19
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.6 60.8 38.0 . 1.3 79
..... Student Affairs 3.5 45.8 54.2 . . 24
Back to top


E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 61.5 36.0 1.5 1.0 1003

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 64.6 33.1 1.5 0.8 263
..... CED 3.6 63.3 36.7 . . 49
..... CHASS 3.6 65.1 29.7 3.1 2.1 195
..... CNR 3.6 61.8 36.4 . 1.8 55
..... COE 3.5 52.8 45.8 0.7 0.7 144
..... COM 3.5 58.3 39.6 . 2.1 48
..... COT 3.5 58.3 33.3 8.3 . 24
..... CVM 3.6 65.7 31.4 2.9 . 70
..... Design 3.8 75.0 25.0 . . 24
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.6 58.0 41.0 . 1.0 100
..... Student Affairs 3.5 48.0 52.0 . . 25
Back to top


E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 62.5 35.4 1.3 0.9 701

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 64.3 34.2 1.5 . 196
..... CED 3.7 72.4 27.6 . . 29
..... CHASS 3.6 70.4 25.6 2.4 1.6 125
..... CNR 3.6 61.4 36.4 2.3 . 44
..... COE 3.5 50.5 47.4 1.0 1.0 97
..... COM 3.5 59.4 37.5 . 3.1 32
..... COT 3.7 66.7 33.3 . . 9
..... CVM 3.6 65.6 32.8 1.6 . 61
..... Design 3.6 60.0 40.0 . . 15
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.5 59.1 37.9 . 3.0 66
..... Student Affairs 3.5 52.4 47.6 . . 21
Back to top


E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 61.5 35.3 1.9 1.2 980

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 63.3 32.8 3.1 0.8 256
..... CED 3.6 62.5 35.4 2.1 . 48
..... CHASS 3.6 67.5 27.2 3.7 1.6 191
..... CNR 3.6 60.4 37.7 . 1.9 53
..... COE 3.5 51.4 45.7 1.4 1.4 140
..... COM 3.6 59.2 38.8 . 2.0 49
..... COT 3.6 60.9 39.1 . . 23
..... CVM 3.6 66.2 30.9 1.5 1.5 68
..... Design 3.7 73.9 26.1 . . 23
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.6 59.0 39.0 . 2.0 100
..... Student Affairs 3.5 47.8 52.2 . . 23
Back to top


E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 60.9 36.4 1.5 1.2 987

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.6 64.3 33.3 1.9 0.4 258
..... CED 3.6 61.2 38.8 . . 49
..... CHASS 3.6 64.1 30.8 3.1 2.1 195
..... CNR 3.5 58.5 39.6 . 1.9 53
..... COE 3.5 51.4 45.8 1.4 1.4 142
..... COM 3.6 59.2 38.8 . 2.0 49
..... COT 3.7 69.6 30.4 . . 23
..... CVM 3.6 61.8 33.8 2.9 1.5 68
..... Design 3.8 75.0 25.0 . . 24
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.6 59.4 38.5 . 2.1 96
..... Student Affairs 3.5 45.8 54.2 . . 24
Back to top


E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.6 60.2 36.1 2.6 1.2 926

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 59.5 33.2 5.7 1.6 247
..... CED 3.6 64.3 33.3 2.4 . 42
..... CHASS 3.6 64.5 32.3 1.6 1.6 186
..... CNR 3.6 56.5 43.5 . . 46
..... COE 3.5 52.9 44.1 2.2 0.7 136
..... COM 3.6 61.7 36.2 . 2.1 47
..... COT 3.6 65.2 26.1 8.7 . 23
..... CVM 3.6 64.6 32.3 1.5 1.5 65
..... Design 3.7 68.4 31.6 . . 19
..... FYC 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 6
..... PAMS 3.6 59.1 39.8 . 1.1 88
..... Student Affairs 3.5 52.4 47.6 . . 21
Back to top


E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.5 60.4 34.0 3.4 2.1 758

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree (%)

2: Disagree (%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.5 60.7 32.7 5.6 1.0 196
..... CED 3.6 65.8 28.9 5.3 . 38
..... CHASS 3.6 67.4 27.4 1.7 3.4 175
..... CNR 3.4 56.8 34.1 4.5 4.5 44
..... COE 3.4 44.9 51.7 1.1 2.2 89
..... COM 3.5 57.6 33.3 6.1 3.0 33
..... COT 3.6 57.1 42.9 . . 7
..... CVM 3.6 62.9 33.9 1.6 1.6 62
..... Design 3.7 70.0 30.0 . . 20
..... FYC 3.6 60.0 40.0 . . 5
..... PAMS 3.5 61.2 29.9 6.0 3.0 67
..... Student Affairs 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 22
Back to top


E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)



3: Some (%)




2: A little (%)



1: Not at
all (%)




Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 22.1 44.5 20.7 12.7 1040

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)



3: Some (%)




2: A little (%)



1: Not at
all (%)




Total(N)
..... CALS 2.6 17.4 42.5 25.1 15.1 259
..... CED 3.1 30.0 52.0 14.0 4.0 50
..... CHASS 3.1 33.5 46.5 16.3 3.7 215
..... CNR 2.9 26.3 47.4 19.3 7.0 57
..... COE 2.6 14.4 43.8 25.3 16.4 146
..... COM 2.2 4.0 42.0 22.0 32.0 50
..... COT 3.0 33.3 44.4 11.1 11.1 27
..... CVM 2.7 13.0 49.3 29.0 8.7 69
..... Design 3.2 50.0 25.0 20.8 4.2 24
..... FYC 3.6 71.4 14.3 14.3 . 7
..... PAMS 2.7 19.4 47.2 13.0 20.4 108
..... Student Affairs 2.4 14.3 39.3 21.4 25.0 28
Back to top


E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.3 17.5 30.5 19.7 32.3 958

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: Not at
all (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.1 9.2 30.1 21.4 39.3 206
..... CED 3.3 39.2 51.0 5.9 3.9 51
..... CHASS 3.2 41.4 42.7 12.7 3.2 220
..... CNR 2.2 13.3 24.4 26.7 35.6 45
..... COE 1.7 2.2 20.1 22.4 55.2 134
..... COM 2.0 5.9 23.5 33.3 37.3 51
..... COT 2.1 8.3 29.2 29.2 33.3 24
..... CVM 1.6 5.7 15.7 15.7 62.9 70
..... Design 3.3 37.5 54.2 8.3 . 24
..... FYC 2.9 28.6 42.9 14.3 14.3 7
..... PAMS 1.8 4.1 21.4 25.5 49.0 98
..... Student Affairs 2.2 17.9 17.9 32.1 32.1 28
Back to top


E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 45.3 30.7 12.0 12.1 1078

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 3.1 42.8 33.8 14.5 8.9 269
..... CED 3.0 36.5 40.4 13.5 9.6 52
..... CHASS 3.1 50.5 24.8 12.2 12.6 222
..... CNR 3.3 55.2 29.3 8.6 6.9 58
..... COE 3.2 48.4 34.6 7.2 9.8 153
..... COM 2.8 34.6 26.9 19.2 19.2 52
..... COT 3.5 59.3 33.3 7.4 . 27
..... CVM 2.9 38.4 30.1 15.1 16.4 73
..... Design 3.4 60.0 20.0 16.0 4.0 25
..... FYC 2.0 14.3 28.6 . 57.1 7
..... PAMS 3.1 45.9 31.5 9.0 13.5 111
..... Student Affairs 2.3 24.1 24.1 10.3 41.4 29
Back to top


E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 26.2 29.6 18.9 25.3 1074

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.3 19.1 27.0 20.2 33.7 267
..... CED 2.7 30.8 28.8 21.2 19.2 52
..... CHASS 2.8 32.1 29.9 21.7 16.3 221
..... CNR 2.8 35.1 31.6 10.5 22.8 57
..... COE 2.6 21.6 36.6 18.3 23.5 153
..... COM 2.8 32.7 34.6 13.5 19.2 52
..... COT 3.0 48.1 18.5 22.2 11.1 27
..... CVM 2.4 20.5 31.5 17.8 30.1 73
..... Design 3.2 44.0 32.0 20.0 4.0 25
..... FYC 2.0 28.6 . 14.3 57.1 7
..... PAMS 2.4 23.4 27.0 17.1 32.4 111
..... Student Affairs 2.3 20.7 24.1 17.2 37.9 29
Back to top


E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 1.9 7.9 20.9 21.0 50.1 1070

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 1.9 8.2 21.6 20.1 50.0 268
..... CED 2.0 9.6 21.2 32.7 36.5 52
..... CHASS 2.0 11.4 20.5 20.0 48.2 220
..... CNR 2.1 12.3 24.6 22.8 40.4 57
..... COE 1.9 3.9 26.8 24.8 44.4 153
..... COM 1.7 3.8 17.3 21.2 57.7 52
..... COT 2.0 14.8 18.5 14.8 51.9 27
..... CVM 1.8 5.6 19.7 19.7 54.9 71
..... Design 1.7 . 24.0 20.0 56.0 25
..... FYC 2.6 28.6 14.3 42.9 14.3 7
..... PAMS 1.6 5.5 11.9 16.5 66.1 109
..... Student Affairs 1.8 6.9 24.1 13.8 55.2 29
Back to top


E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 18.8 29.9 23.5 27.8 1072

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects
College of appointmentMean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.4 17.8 32.0 25.3 24.9 269
..... CED 2.6 25.0 30.8 26.9 17.3 52
..... CHASS 2.4 19.9 27.6 24.0 28.5 221
..... CNR 2.6 27.6 25.9 22.4 24.1 58
..... COE 2.4 19.6 30.7 21.6 28.1 153
..... COM 2.0 9.6 21.2 26.9 42.3 52
..... COT 2.8 25.9 37.0 25.9 11.1 27
..... CVM 2.5 19.7 35.2 23.9 21.1 71
..... Design 2.5 12.0 48.0 16.0 24.0 25
..... FYC 1.4 . 14.3 14.3 71.4 7
..... PAMS 2.2 14.8 25.9 20.4 38.9 108
..... Student Affairs 2.3 17.2 31.0 20.7 31.0 29
Back to top


E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 1.9 11.6 18.2 18.0 52.2 1069

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 1.7 5.6 16.9 18.0 59.6 267
..... CED 1.8 11.5 13.5 17.3 57.7 52
..... CHASS 2.3 25.3 19.9 18.6 36.2 221
..... CNR 2.1 19.3 17.5 19.3 43.9 57
..... COE 1.9 11.1 20.9 17.6 50.3 153
..... COM 1.7 5.8 19.2 17.3 57.7 52
..... COT 1.9 7.7 23.1 23.1 46.2 26
..... CVM 1.7 5.6 16.7 19.4 58.3 72
..... Design 2.1 8.0 28.0 32.0 32.0 25
..... FYC 1.0 . . . 100.0 7
..... PAMS 1.6 3.7 17.4 15.6 63.3 109
..... Student Affairs 1.7 14.3 10.7 7.1 67.9 28
Back to top


E9f: Interest in advising international students

  Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 26.4 33.0 18.1 22.6 1068

E9f: Interest in advising international students
College of appointment* Mean Rating 4: A great
deal (%)
3: Some (%) 2: A little (%) 1: None (%)
Total(N)
..... CALS 2.7 28.1 36.3 15.7 19.9 267
..... CED 2.6 19.6 41.2 17.6 21.6 51
..... CHASS 2.3 20.5 22.7 25.9 30.9 220
..... CNR 2.9 31.0 44.8 12.1 12.1 58
..... COE 3.1 44.1 36.8 8.6 10.5 152
..... COM 2.0 7.8 19.6 33.3 39.2 51
..... COT 3.3 44.4 44.4 11.1 . 27
..... CVM 2.3 19.4 25.0 22.2 33.3 72
..... Design 2.5 29.2 25.0 16.7 29.2 24
..... FYC 2.6 28.6 14.3 42.9 14.3 7
..... PAMS 2.7 21.8 43.6 17.3 17.3 110
..... Student Affairs 2.0 13.8 24.1 10.3 51.7 29
Back to top

Continue to Section F: Working Relationships


View These Results by Academic Profile

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with E: Diversity/Multiculturalism results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page