North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	73.2	83.3
..... Yes (%)	26.8	16.7
Total (N)	209	72

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.1	32.4
3: Agree (%)	50.2	47.9
2: Disagree (%)	11.7	18.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	1.4
Total (N)	205	71

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	30.4
3: Agree (%)	49.8	43.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.3	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	8.7
Total (N)	207	69

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	27.7
3: Agree (%)	52.2	50.8
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	6.2
Total (N)	203	65

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	28.4	29.3
4: Strong (%)	36.9	41.4
3: Average (%)	28.4	20.7
2: Weak (%)	4.5	8.6
1: Very weak (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	176	58

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	42.4	29.2
4: Strong (%)	37.9	41.5
3: Average (%)	13.8	24.6
2: Weak (%)	4.4	4.6
1: Very weak (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	203	65

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	44.4	37.7
4: Strong (%)	38.6	31.9
3: Average (%)	13.5	26.1
2: Weak (%)	2.9	4.3
1: Very weak (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	207	69

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	21.9	4.3
4: Strong (%)	45.3	34.8
3: Average (%)	23.4	34.8
2: Weak (%)	7.8	26.1
1: Very weak (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	64	23

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	15.1	8.5
4: Strong (%)	42.4	34.0
3: Average (%)	36.7	42.6
2: Weak (%)	5.8	12.8
1: Very weak (%)	.	2.1
Total (N)	139	47

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.1
5: Very strong (%)	49.2	37.1
4: Strong (%)	34.2	37.1
3: Average (%)	13.9	24.2
2: Weak (%)	2.1	1.6
1: Very weak (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	187	62

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	18.3	18.9
4: Strong (%)	51.5	35.8
3: Average (%)	26.0	37.7
2: Weak (%)	3.6	7.5
1: Very weak (%)	0.6	.
Total (N)	169	53

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	4.1
A (%)	20.6	22.6
B (%)	55.8	64.2
C (%)	18.2	11.3
D (%)	3.0	.
F (%)	2.4	1.9
Total (N)	165	53

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.2
A (%)	40.0	37.9
B (%)	48.3	48.5
C (%)	9.3	10.6
D (%)	1.5	1.5
F (%)	1.0	1.5
Total (N)	205	66

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.6
A (%)	55.8	64.3
B (%)	37.5	28.6
C (%)	6.3	7.1
D (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	208	70

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5
A (%)	50.5	55.7
B (%)	41.3	38.6
C (%)	6.8	5.7
D (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	206	70

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.5
A (%)	54.4	52.9
B (%)	43.2	45.7
C (%)	2.4	1.4
Total (N)	206	70

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.4
A (%)	52.7	48.6
B (%)	41.1	45.7
C (%)	6.3	5.7
Total (N)	207	70

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	31.3	36.8
Vision with slow progress (%)	40.4	39.7
No clear vision (%)	26.0	20.6
Not familiar (%)	2.4	2.9
Total (N)	208	68

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.7	45.1
3: Agree (%)	58.5	49.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	3.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.0
Total (N)	147	51

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	17.8	20.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	32.7	37.1
No clear vision (%)	36.1	25.7
Not familiar (%)	13.5	17.1
Total (N)	208	70

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	59.2	56.3
Change for the worse (%)	16.0	14.1
Not really change (%)	24.8	29.6
Total (N)	206	71

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	28.8	45.1
Change for the worse (%)	20.5	8.5
Not really change (%)	50.7	46.5
Total (N)	205	71

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	37.3	52.1
Change for the worse (%)	15.2	7.0
Not really change (%)	47.5	40.8
Total (N)	204	71

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	37.6	38.8
3: Good (%)	41.6	46.3
2: Fair (%)	16.3	9.0
1: Poor (%)	4.5	6.0
Total (N)	202	67

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	41.8	54.5
3: Good (%)	36.1	28.8
2: Fair (%)	14.4	12.1
1: Poor (%)	7.7	4.5
Total (N)	194	66

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	34.5	49.2
3: Good (%)	44.2	33.8
2: Fair (%)	14.7	7.7
1: Poor (%)	6.6	9.2
Total (N)	197	65

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	29.2	39.1
3: Good (%)	49.7	37.5
2: Fair (%)	18.5	15.6
1: Poor (%)	2.6	7.8
Total (N)	195	64

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	52.5	57.4
3: Good (%)	40.0	33.8
2: Fair (%)	4.0	5.9
1: Poor (%)	3.5	2.9
Total (N)	200	68

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	21.5	30.2
3: Good (%)	37.4	42.9
2: Fair (%)	29.2	17.5
1: Poor (%)	11.8	9.5
Total (N)	195	63

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	39.2	50.0
3: Good (%)	40.2	30.3
2: Fair (%)	14.6	12.1
1: Poor (%)	6.0	7.6
Total (N)	199	66

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	23.8	31.1
3: Good (%)	46.5	37.7
2: Fair (%)	21.5	14.8
1: Poor (%)	8.1	16.4
Total (N)	172	61

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	15.0	27.9
3: Good (%)	41.0	36.8
2: Fair (%)	24.0	26.5
1: Poor (%)	20.0	8.8
Total (N)	200	68

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.3	37.1
3: Good (%)	44.6	38.7
2: Fair (%)	21.5	12.9
1: Poor (%)	8.6	11.3
Total (N)	186	62

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	42.7	50.8
3: Good (%)	34.9	26.2
2: Fair (%)	16.7	15.4
1: Poor (%)	5.7	7.7
Total (N)	192	65

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	54.5	64.1
3: Good (%)	38.2	29.7
2: Fair (%)	5.2	4.7
1: Poor (%)	2.1	1.6
Total (N)	191	64

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	40.9	40.3
3: Good (%)	40.4	43.3
2: Fair (%)	12.6	11.9
1: Poor (%)	6.1	4.5
Total (N)	198	67

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	39.8	38.5
3: Good (%)	38.7	41.5
2: Fair (%)	13.6	12.3
1: Poor (%)	7.9	7.7
Total (N)	191	65

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	45.4	42.9
3: Good (%)	37.2	27.0
2: Fair (%)	12.6	20.6
1: Poor (%)	4.9	9.5
Total (N)	183	63

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	4.6	15.4
3: Good (%)	42.1	36.9
2: Fair (%)	34.5	38.5
1: Poor (%)	18.8	9.2
Total (N)	197	65

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	3.2	12.1
3: Good (%)	25.4	27.6
2: Fair (%)	39.2	39.7
1: Poor (%)	32.3	20.7
Total (N)	189	58

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	3.6	13.2
3: Good (%)	26.3	24.5
2: Fair (%)	40.7	39.6
1: Poor (%)	29.3	22.6
Total (N)	167	53

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	19.4	23.4
3: Good (%)	41.4	51.6
2: Fair (%)	20.9	17.2
1: Poor (%)	18.3	7.8
Total (N)	191	64

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.6	11.9
3: Good (%)	29.8	35.6
2: Fair (%)	37.0	30.5
1: Poor (%)	26.5	22.0
Total (N)	181	59

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	18.9	19.7
3: Good (%)	36.8	37.7
2: Fair (%)	24.9	27.9
1: Poor (%)	19.5	14.8
Total (N)	185	61

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	3.7	14.7
3: Good (%)	35.3	29.4
2: Fair (%)	33.8	38.2
1: Poor (%)	27.2	17.6
Total (N)	136	34

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	6.4	13.8
3: Good (%)	31.2	29.2
2: Fair (%)	31.2	30.8
1: Poor (%)	31.2	26.2
Total (N)	202	65

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	2.9	9.6
3: Good (%)	31.8	40.4
2: Fair (%)	30.1	28.8
1: Poor (%)	35.3	21.2
Total (N)	173	52

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	25.6	24.1
3: Good (%)	46.9	44.8
2: Fair (%)	18.8	25.9
1: Poor (%)	8.8	5.2
Total (N)	160	58

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	34.4	38.7
3: Good (%)	51.7	46.8
2: Fair (%)	8.3	12.9
1: Poor (%)	5.6	1.6
Total (N)	180	62

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	17.9
3: Good (%)	45.6	46.4
2: Fair (%)	26.7	28.6
1: Poor (%)	17.8	7.1
Total (N)	180	56

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	15.7
3: Good (%)	42.3	45.1
2: Fair (%)	28.6	31.4
1: Poor (%)	22.0	7.8
Total (N)	168	51

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	35.1	29.3
3: Good (%)	43.5	39.7
2: Fair (%)	13.7	17.2
1: Poor (%)	7.7	13.8
Total (N)	168	58

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	4.7	9.8
3: Good (%)	35.2	34.4
2: Fair (%)	43.0	42.6
1: Poor (%)	17.1	13.1
Total (N)	193	61

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	3.9	11.9
3: Good (%)	27.9	33.3
2: Fair (%)	42.6	28.6
1: Poor (%)	25.6	26.2
Total (N)	129	42

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	17.0
3: Good (%)	53.3	35.8
2: Fair (%)	27.2	35.8
1: Poor (%)	13.9	11.3
Total (N)	180	53

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	30.1	32.7
3: Good (%)	47.2	44.9
2: Fair (%)	12.3	20.4
1: Poor (%)	10.4	2.0
Total (N)	163	49

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	35.6	36.8
3: Good (%)	51.1	47.4
2: Fair (%)	9.4	12.3
1: Poor (%)	3.9	3.5
Total (N)	180	57

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	12.9	17.0
3: Good (%)	50.3	53.2
2: Fair (%)	26.4	23.4
1: Poor (%)	10.4	6.4
Total (N)	163	47

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	12.2	16.3
3: Good (%)	43.2	51.2
2: Fair (%)	28.4	25.6
1: Poor (%)	16.2	7.0
Total (N)	148	43

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	36.5	26.3
3: Good (%)	46.7	47.4
2: Fair (%)	13.8	12.3
1: Poor (%)	3.0	14.0
Total (N)	167	57

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.7	54.4
3: Agree (%)	42.4	33.8
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	5.9
Total (N)	205	68

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.4	46.3
3: Agree (%)	47.3	37.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.8	11.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	4.5
Total (N)	203	67

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.9	46.3
3: Agree (%)	37.1	40.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.4	10.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	3.0
Total (N)	202	67

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.4	20.9
3: Agree (%)	45.5	32.8
2: Disagree (%)	31.2	38.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.9	7.5
Total (N)	202	67

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.9	15.4
3: Agree (%)	39.6	35.4
2: Disagree (%)	41.1	38.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.4	10.8
Total (N)	202	65

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very familiar (%)	41.2	35.3
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	38.2	33.8
2: Not very familiar (%)	17.2	22.1
1: Not at all familiar (%)	3.4	8.8
Total (N)	204	68

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very well (%)	6.3	4.4
3: Fairly well (%)	30.2	33.8
2: Not very well (%)	50.7	47.1
1: Not at all (%)	12.7	14.7
Total (N)	205	68

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very well (%)	5.4	2.9
3: Fairly well (%)	31.7	33.8
2: Not very well (%)	54.1	48.5
1: Not at all (%)	8.8	14.7
Total (N)	205	68

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very well (%)	13.7	11.6
3: Fairly well (%)	37.6	50.7
2: Not very well (%)	42.9	30.4
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	7.2
Total (N)	205	69

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very well (%)	28.3	30.9
3: Fairly well (%)	42.9	47.1
2: Not very well (%)	24.4	17.6
1: Not at all (%)	4.4	4.4
Total (N)	205	68

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.2	11.9
3: Agree (%)	47.1	59.7
2: Disagree (%)	30.4	22.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	6.0
Total (N)	204	67

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.7	49.3
3: Agree (%)	38.5	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	10.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	1.4
Total (N)	205	69

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	40.5	49.2
3: Good (%)	43.0	33.8
2: Fair (%)	14.0	12.3
1: Poor (%)	2.5	4.6
Total (N)	200	65

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	22.2
3: Good (%)	43.6	57.1
2: Fair (%)	26.2	15.9
1: Poor (%)	14.9	4.8
Total (N)	195	63

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	12.3	15.7
3: Good (%)	47.4	52.9
2: Fair (%)	28.6	25.5
1: Poor (%)	11.7	5.9
Total (N)	154	51

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	8.8	9.8
3: Good (%)	46.3	51.0
2: Fair (%)	36.7	35.3
1: Poor (%)	8.2	3.9
Total (N)	147	51

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.3	69.4
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	10.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.2	6.1
Total (N)	151	49

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.8	15.2
3: Agree (%)	49.7	67.4
2: Disagree (%)	26.5	8.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.0	8.7
Total (N)	147	46

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.8	6.7
3: Agree (%)	42.6	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	29.8	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.9	11.1
Total (N)	141	45

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very effective (%)	16.7	18.2
3: Somewhat effective (%)	52.8	50.0
2: Not very effective (%)	26.4	13.6
1: Not at all effective (%)	4.2	18.2
Total (N)	72	22

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very important (%)	43.6	53.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	47.5	40.9
2: Not very important (%)	7.8	4.5
1: Not at all important (%)	1.0	1.5
Total (N)	204	66

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Very important (%)	39.4	65.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.8	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	14.3	1.4
1: Not at all important (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	203	69

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: Very important (%)	21.5	42.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	39.8	41.0
2: Not very important (%)	28.7	13.1
1: Not at all important (%)	9.9	3.3
Total (N)	181	61

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.3	11.9
3: Agree (%)	72.9	54.2
2: Disagree (%)	10.8	32.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.7
Total (N)	166	59

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.5	26.8
3: Agree (%)	53.3	48.2
2: Disagree (%)	18.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	10.7
Total (N)	169	56

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.5	27.5
3: Agree (%)	55.0	45.1
2: Disagree (%)	14.4	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	9.8
Total (N)	160	51

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	28.3
3: Agree (%)	58.4	50.9
2: Disagree (%)	10.6	13.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	7.5
Total (N)	161	53

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.0	22.4
3: Agree (%)	51.1	46.6
2: Disagree (%)	23.0	24.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	6.9
Total (N)	178	58

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	29.8
3: Agree (%)	55.9	42.6
2: Disagree (%)	15.5	17.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	10.6
Total (N)	161	47

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.4	30.8
3: Agree (%)	54.7	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	11.3	13.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	9.6
Total (N)	159	52

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.5	53.7
3: Agree (%)	43.5	38.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	6.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	1.5
Total (N)	200	67

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	46.0	45.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	2.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	2.2
Total (N)	163	46

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	51.5
3: Agree (%)	43.2	35.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.5	8.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.4
Total (N)	199	68

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.5	66.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	134	36

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.1	54.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	38.1
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	1.6
Total (N)	196	63

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	45.5	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	4.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	1.6
Total (N)	198	64

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.2	42.6
3: Agree (%)	46.6	42.6
2: Disagree (%)	4.0	11.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	3.3
Total (N)	176	61

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.1	39.1
3: Agree (%)	43.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.1	8.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.7	2.2
Total (N)	137	46

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.5	65.6
3: Agree (%)	32.0	29.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	3.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	1.6
Total (N)	200	64

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.9	64.7
3: Agree (%)	34.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.6	2.0
Total (N)	178	51

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.7	61.5
3: Agree (%)	32.3	35.4
2: Disagree (%)	1.5	1.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	1.5
Total (N)	198	65

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.2	68.3
3: Agree (%)	34.8	31.7
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	155	41

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.5	59.3
3: Agree (%)	32.0	35.6
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	1.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.4
Total (N)	197	59

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.5	63.9
3: Agree (%)	33.5	32.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	1.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.6
Total (N)	197	61

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.8	55.7
3: Agree (%)	32.8	34.4
2: Disagree (%)	5.4	6.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.1	3.3
Total (N)	186	61

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.2	59.1
3: Agree (%)	32.2	34.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.7	2.3
Total (N)	152	44

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	15.3	23.8
3: Some (%)	41.8	44.4
2: A little (%)	25.5	23.8
1: Not at all (%)	17.3	7.9
Total (N)	196	63

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	9.2	9.3
3: Some (%)	23.0	50.0
2: A little (%)	21.7	20.4
1: Not at all (%)	46.1	20.4
Total (N)	152	54

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	42.3	44.1
3: Some (%)	34.8	30.9
2: A little (%)	15.4	11.8
1: None (%)	7.5	13.2
Total (N)	201	68

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	17.9	22.7
3: Some (%)	28.9	21.2
2: A little (%)	21.9	15.2
1: None (%)	31.3	40.9
Total (N)	201	66

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	6.0	14.9
3: Some (%)	22.4	19.4
2: A little (%)	19.4	22.4
1: None (%)	52.2	43.3
Total (N)	201	67

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	15.4	25.0
3: Some (%)	33.8	26.5
2: A little (%)	26.9	20.6
1: None (%)	23.9	27.9
Total (N)	201	68

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	5.0	7.5
3: Some (%)	17.0	16.4
2: A little (%)	18.5	16.4
1: None (%)	59.5	59.7
Total (N)	200	67

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	25.5	35.8
3: Some (%)	38.5	29.9
2: A little (%)	16.5	13.4
1: None (%)	19.5	20.9
Total (N)	200	67

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	27.9
3: Agree (%)	46.8	45.6
2: Disagree (%)	19.2	19.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.4	7.4
Total (N)	203	68

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.3	68.9
3: Agree (%)	48.7	31.1
2: Disagree (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	189	61

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.2	31.7
3: Agree (%)	60.8	63.3
2: Disagree (%)	4.0	3.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.7
Total (N)	199	60

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.6	21.2
3: Agree (%)	53.7	57.6
2: Disagree (%)	20.2	15.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	6.1
Total (N)	203	66

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.7	9.1
3: Agree (%)	55.7	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	26.8	25.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	10.9
Total (N)	183	55

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.8	7.9
3: Agree (%)	55.0	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	31.7	36.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	7.9
Total (N)	120	38

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.2	34.4
3: Agree (%)	52.3	48.4
2: Disagree (%)	9.0	10.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	6.3
Total (N)	199	64

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
Frequently (%)	22.8	37.9
Sometimes (%)	52.5	33.3
Seldom (%)	12.4	13.6
Never (%)	12.4	15.2
Total (N)	202	66

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
Frequently (%)	50.7	37.9
Sometimes (%)	38.4	50.0
Seldom (%)	7.4	7.6
Never (%)	3.4	4.5
Total (N)	203	66

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
Frequently (%)	34.0	35.4
Sometimes (%)	41.9	46.2
Seldom (%)	19.7	12.3
Never (%)	4.4	6.2
Total (N)	203	65

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	39.4	36.9
Sometimes (%)	46.3	38.5
Seldom (%)	10.3	18.5
Never (%)	3.9	6.2
Total (N)	203	65

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
Frequently (%)	10.4	12.3
Sometimes (%)	28.4	35.4
Seldom (%)	31.3	27.7
Never (%)	29.9	24.6
Total (N)	201	65

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
Frequently (%)	76.8	74.2
Sometimes (%)	18.7	22.7
Seldom (%)	2.5	.
Never (%)	2.0	3.0
Total (N)	203	66

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
Frequently (%)	55.9	51.5
Sometimes (%)	29.2	34.8
Seldom (%)	12.9	7.6
Never (%)	2.0	6.1
Total (N)	202	66

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	46.5	41.8
Sometimes (%)	35.1	41.8
Seldom (%)	13.4	4.5
Never (%)	5.0	11.9
Total (N)	202	67

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
Frequently (%)	40.4	38.5
Sometimes (%)	30.5	26.2
Seldom (%)	19.2	13.8
Never (%)	9.9	21.5
Total (N)	203	65

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.4	51.9
3: Satisfied (%)	50.3	44.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.6	3.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	153	52

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.6	41.5
3: Satisfied (%)	49.7	54.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.4	3.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	155	53

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	58.4	61.5
3: Satisfied (%)	36.4	32.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.9	3.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.3	1.9
Total (N)	154	52

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	76.1	80.4
3: Satisfied (%)	21.9	15.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	1.9	3.9
Total (N)	155	51

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.4	41.2
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	49.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	7.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.6	2.0
Total (N)	156	51

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.3	14.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.7	72.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.2	11.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.8	2.3
Total (N)	137	43

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.8	29.1
3: Satisfied (%)	62.8	65.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.8	5.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	180	55

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.8	19.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	54.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.9	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.4	9.5
Total (N)	131	42

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.3	18.6
3: Satisfied (%)	54.0	44.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.2	20.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.4	16.3
Total (N)	163	43

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.4	40.0
3: Agree (%)	59.9	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.4	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	182	60

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	36.9
3: Agree (%)	48.7	52.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	9.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	1.5
Total (N)	195	65

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	42.9
3: Agree (%)	50.0	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	11.4	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	4.8
Total (N)	44	21

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.5	33.9
3: Agree (%)	51.6	55.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.4	5.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	5.4
Total (N)	157	56

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.7	16.4
3: Agree (%)	54.9	50.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.3	23.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	9.1
Total (N)	175	55

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.3	55.2
3: Agree (%)	52.1	29.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.9	13.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	1.7
Total (N)	190	58

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	22.2
3: Agree (%)	53.8	61.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.8	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.3	5.6
Total (N)	39	18

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	26.1
3: Agree (%)	51.7	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.8	4.3
Total (N)	147	46

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.0	24.0
3: Satisfied (%)	59.9	52.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.9	14.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.2	10.0
Total (N)	157	50

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	60.9	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	18.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.3	12.5
Total (N)	110	32

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.7	26.5
3: Satisfied (%)	76.7	67.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.3	6.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	150	49

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.2	18.8
3: Satisfied (%)	41.4	40.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.9	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.4	15.6
Total (N)	111	32

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.3	22.4
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	67.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.0	8.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	2.0
Total (N)	144	49

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.4	18.4
3: Satisfied (%)	71.1	73.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.7	7.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	121	38

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	17.9
3: Satisfied (%)	39.1	33.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.3	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.8	10.7
Total (N)	184	56

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.8	17.1
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	51.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.2	19.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.9	12.2
Total (N)	163	41

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.5	12.8
3: Satisfied (%)	41.1	35.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.7	35.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.6	15.4
Total (N)	146	39

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.2	10.6
3: Satisfied (%)	67.2	70.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.2	14.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.5	4.3
Total (N)	134	47

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.3	15.0
3: Satisfied (%)	59.6	55.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.7	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.4	5.0
Total (N)	141	40

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.2	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	59.2	54.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	3.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	196	63

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.5	34.9
3: Satisfied (%)	78.0	58.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	4.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	2.3
Total (N)	141	43

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.2	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	54.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.7	27.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.4	6.3
Total (N)	153	48

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	33.0	41.2
No (%)	66.0	58.8
Don't know (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	200	68

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Very helpful (%)	53.0	42.9
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	21.2	46.4
2: Not very helpful (%)	22.7	7.1
1: Not at all helpful (%)	3.0	3.6
Total (N)	66	28

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.7	19.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.8	43.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.5	22.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.9	15.5
Total (N)	173	58

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.1	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	61.6	48.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.5	26.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	17.3
Total (N)	172	52

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	14.9
3: Satisfied (%)	60.4	46.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.1	19.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.1	19.1
Total (N)	149	47

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.0	9.3
3: Satisfied (%)	57.3	51.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.3	18.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	20.9
Total (N)	150	43

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	35.4	42.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.4	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.7	24.4
Total (N)	161	45

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	35.1	39.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.7	36.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.2	24.4
Total (N)	151	41

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	22.9	20.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.9	43.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.7	34.1
Total (N)	157	44

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	34.4
3: Agree (%)	44.6	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.8	21.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	6.3
Total (N)	193	64

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.4	36.4
3: Agree (%)	53.1	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.9	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	4.5
Total (N)	192	66

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.8	36.2
3: Agree (%)	54.8	60.3
2: Disagree (%)	6.4	3.4
Total (N)	188	58

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.8	42.0
3: Agree (%)	49.2	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.5	6.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.6	4.0
Total (N)	177	50

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.9	47.4
3: Agree (%)	44.6	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	18.1	10.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	5.3
Total (N)	177	57

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	35.5
3: Agree (%)	48.9	35.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.3	25.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	3.2
Total (N)	188	62

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.1	40.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	45.2
2: Disagree (%)	11.2	9.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	4.8
Total (N)	188	62

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	24.6
3: Agree (%)	41.2	29.5
2: Disagree (%)	33.7	37.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	8.2
Total (N)	187	61

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.7	35.6
3: Agree (%)	51.6	35.6
2: Disagree (%)	17.7	22.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	6.8
Total (N)	186	59

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very well (%)	20.9	35.3
3: Fairly well (%)	51.5	38.2
2: Not very well (%)	21.9	19.1
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	7.4
Total (N)	196	68

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	28.6	39.7
Yes (%)	71.4	60.3
Total (N)	199	68

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	21.1	57.4
Yes (%)	78.9	42.6
Total (N)	199	68

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	52.8	72.1
Yes (%)	47.2	27.9
Total (N)	199	68

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	88.9	70.6
Yes (%)	11.1	29.4
Total (N)	199	68

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Very well (%)	41.1	40.9
3: Fairly well (%)	45.7	39.4
2: Not very well (%)	11.2	13.6
1: Not at all (%)	2.0	6.1
Total (N)	197	66

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very well (%)	46.4	51.5
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	25.8
2: Not very well (%)	7.7	15.2
1: Not at all (%)	1.5	7.6
Total (N)	196	66

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.2	39.6
3: Agree (%)	39.9	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	10.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	6.3
Total (N)	173	48

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.7	44.7
3: Agree (%)	46.9	46.8
2: Disagree (%)	5.0	2.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	6.4
Total (N)	179	47

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.1	20.8
3: Agree (%)	55.6	50.9
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	22.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	5.7
Total (N)	169	53

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.8	13.0
3: Agree (%)	56.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	26.5	35.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	7.4
Total (N)	166	54

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.2	23.1
3: Agree (%)	55.3	69.2
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	38	13

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.9	15.0
3: Agree (%)	57.7	52.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.0	7.5
Total (N)	111	40

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.4	14.9
3: Agree (%)	50.7	44.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	31.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.9	8.5
Total (N)	142	47

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.4	8.8
3: Agree (%)	52.7	45.6
2: Disagree (%)	26.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	12.3
Total (N)	169	57

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.5	30.4
3: Agree (%)	57.6	48.2
2: Disagree (%)	16.4	16.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	5.4
Total (N)	177	56

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.1	33.9
3: Agree (%)	52.7	46.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.5	10.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	8.9
Total (N)	182	56

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.5	26.7
3: Agree (%)	59.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	6.7
Total (N)	39	15

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	24.3
3: Agree (%)	58.6	56.8
2: Disagree (%)	18.1	10.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	8.1
Total (N)	116	37

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.7	32.1
3: Agree (%)	62.2	58.5
2: Disagree (%)	9.6	9.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	156	53

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.6	18.6
3: Agree (%)	61.9	55.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	22.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	3.4
Total (N)	176	59

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	74.4	45.0
No experience (%)	25.6	55.0
Total (N)	195	60

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	34.9	68.3
Yes (%)	65.1	31.7
Total (N)	195	60

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	56.9	71.7
Yes (%)	43.1	28.3
Total (N)	195	60

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	92.3	88.3
Yes (%)	7.7	11.7
Total (N)	195	60

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	97.4	98.3
Yes (%)	2.6	1.7
Total (N)	195	60

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	16.7
3: Agree (%)	63.7	63.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.7	13.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	5.6
Total (N)	146	36

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.8	18.6
3: Agree (%)	57.8	46.5
2: Disagree (%)	22.4	27.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	7.0
Total (N)	161	43

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	26.8
3: Agree (%)	62.3	53.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.2	14.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	4.9
Total (N)	162	41

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	23.8
3: Agree (%)	53.7	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	25.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	7.1
Total (N)	162	42

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.4	22.9
3: Agree (%)	63.1	62.9
2: Disagree (%)	6.4	5.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	8.6
Total (N)	141	35

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.2	25.8
3: Agree (%)	60.6	61.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	6.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	6.5
Total (N)	142	31

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.7	24.2
3: Agree (%)	59.2	48.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.9	15.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.2	12.1
Total (N)	130	33

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.5	11.8
3: Satisfied (%)	60.3	61.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.8	23.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	2.9
Total (N)	146	34

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	25.9
3: Agree (%)	49.7	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	18.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	11.1
Total (N)	151	54

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	48.5	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.7	22.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	12.5
Total (N)	136	40

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.6	18.9
3: Agree (%)	37.1	40.5
2: Disagree (%)	37.9	27.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.4	13.5
Total (N)	132	37

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.9	11.4
3: Agree (%)	33.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	39.8	25.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.0	20.0
Total (N)	123	35

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.7	11.6
3: Agree (%)	23.0	37.2
2: Disagree (%)	42.6	27.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.7	23.3
Total (N)	148	43

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very well (%)	19.2	19.4
3: Fairly well (%)	37.9	35.8
2: Not very well (%)	26.3	22.4
1: Not at all (%)	16.7	22.4
Total (N)	198	67

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.6	24.6
3: Agree (%)	55.4	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	19.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	3.5
Total (N)	186	57

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.7	46.2
3: Agree (%)	58.2	49.2
2: Disagree (%)	6.6	3.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	1.5
Total (N)	196	65

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.2	8.8
3: Agree (%)	16.9	28.1
2: Disagree (%)	33.7	28.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	47.2	35.1
Total (N)	178	57

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	12.5
3: Agree (%)	39.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.9	25.0
Total (N)	163	48

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.2	10.8
3: Agree (%)	51.9	64.9
2: Disagree (%)	28.1	13.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.8	10.8
Total (N)	135	37

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.1	7.6
3: Agree (%)	49.0	53.0
2: Disagree (%)	35.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.1	6.1
Total (N)	198	66

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	28.8
3: Agree (%)	61.0	53.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.9	7.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	10.6
Total (N)	195	66

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.7	19.7
3: Agree (%)	61.7	53.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	21.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	6.1
Total (N)	196	66

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	65.0	83.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.5	14.9
2: Not very important (%)	4.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.5	1.5
Total (N)	197	67

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Very important (%)	66.7	91.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	28.8	7.5
2: Not very important (%)	3.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.5	1.5
Total (N)	198	67

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Very important (%)	67.0	85.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.0	14.9
2: Not very important (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	197	67

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Very important (%)	66.2	92.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.3	7.5
2: Not very important (%)	4.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	198	67

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Very important (%)	52.8	80.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	36.5	15.2
2: Not very important (%)	8.1	3.0
1: Not at all important (%)	2.5	1.5
Total (N)	197	66

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Very important (%)	70.6	71.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.3	18.2
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	9.1
1: Not at all important (%)	1.5	1.5
Total (N)	197	66

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.7	12.1
3: Agree (%)	37.1	40.9
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	24.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.8	22.7
Total (N)	197	66

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.8	15.2
3: Agree (%)	43.9	42.4
2: Disagree (%)	27.6	28.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.7	13.6
Total (N)	196	66

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.2	9.2
3: Agree (%)	53.3	49.2
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.2	10.8
Total (N)	195	65

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.2	47.7
3: Satisfied (%)	46.9	38.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.2	9.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	4.6
Total (N)	196	65

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	25.6
3: Satisfied (%)	51.6	41.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.0	18.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	14.0
Total (N)	153	43

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.5	9.8
3: Satisfied (%)	55.0	54.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.3	27.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	7.8
Total (N)	160	51

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.7	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	47.8	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.6	21.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.9	18.2
Total (N)	92	33

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.8	7.6
3: Satisfied (%)	37.2	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.1	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.9	24.2
Total (N)	196	66

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	13.6
3: Satisfied (%)	29.7	30.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.2	21.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.7	34.8
Total (N)	195	66

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.8	10.6
3: Satisfied (%)	53.4	51.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.4	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	15.2
Total (N)	193	66

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.7	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	52.3	60.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.3	12.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.7	18.2
Total (N)	197	66

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.3	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	55.3	46.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	26.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	14.1
Total (N)	190	64

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	48.2	34.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.8	41.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.0	21.7
Total (N)	139	46

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.4	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	44.7	42.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.5	34.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	24.5	19.7
Total (N)	188	66

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.1	4.6
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	32.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.5	43.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	39.4	20.0
Total (N)	188	65

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	68.1	51.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	29.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.6	7.4
Total (N)	69	27

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.0	2.6
3: Satisfied (%)	42.0	31.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.0	42.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.0	23.7
Total (N)	100	38

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.1	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	70.6	67.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.9	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.3	10.3
Total (N)	177	58

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.4	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.6	15.9
Total (N)	192	63

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	67.4	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	9.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.9	14.3
Total (N)	190	63

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.1	1.6
3: Satisfied (%)	40.7	58.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.1	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.0	20.6
Total (N)	194	63

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.3	49.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.2	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	10.9
Total (N)	149	55

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.4	54.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.4	31.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	13.7
Total (N)	141	51

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.9	15.5
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	70.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.1	12.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	1.7
Total (N)	176	58

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	1.9
3: Satisfied (%)	58.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.4	32.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.4	15.4
Total (N)	159	52

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.3	57.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.5	21.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.0	21.2
Total (N)	109	33

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.1	6.9
3: Satisfied (%)	65.1	62.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.2	20.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.6	10.3
Total (N)	109	29

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: A lot (%)	29.2	28.8
3: Some (%)	23.6	27.3
2: A little (%)	21.5	21.2
1: None at all (%)	25.6	22.7
Total (N)	195	66

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very likely (%)	31.6	30.8
3: Somewhat likely (%)	33.2	27.7
2: Not very likely (%)	20.4	27.7
1: Not at all likely (%)	14.8	13.8
Total (N)	196	65

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.8	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	72.8	79.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.3	9.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	1.6
Total (N)	195	63

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	75.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	15.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.1	3.1
Total (N)	196	64

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	21.1
3: Satisfied (%)	61.4	60.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	7.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	10.5
Total (N)	140	38

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.2	15.2
3: Satisfied (%)	66.9	57.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.7	21.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.2	6.1
Total (N)	136	33

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.9	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	75.3	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.4	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	4.2
Total (N)	85	24

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.7	17.1
3: Satisfied (%)	71.7	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.0	11.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	113	35

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.0	9.4
3: Satisfied (%)	62.3	84.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.9	6.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	.
Total (N)	138	32

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
Once a week or more (%)	27.9	16.7
A few times a month (%)	10.7	10.6
A few times a semester (%)	12.2	12.1
Once a semester (%)	4.1	4.5
Once a year (%)	4.6	10.6
Never (%)	40.6	45.5
Total (N)	197	66

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
Once a week or more (%)	8.2	3.1
A few times a month (%)	8.2	7.8
A few times a semester (%)	17.4	18.8
Once a semester (%)	9.2	3.1
Once a year (%)	9.2	6.3
Never (%)	47.7	60.9
Total (N)	195	64

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	1.0	4.5
A few times a month (%)	4.1	6.1
A few times a semester (%)	6.1	9.1
Once a semester (%)	4.1	1.5
Once a year (%)	7.1	1.5
Never (%)	77.6	77.3
Total (N)	196	66

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
Once a week or more (%)	0.5	.
A few times a month (%)	1.5	7.6
A few times a semester (%)	19.4	12.1
Once a semester (%)	19.4	24.2
Once a year (%)	17.3	19.7
Never (%)	41.8	36.4
Total (N)	196	66

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2
Once a week or more (%)	2.6	3.1
A few times a month (%)	8.7	9.2
A few times a semester (%)	24.0	12.3
Once a semester (%)	13.8	10.8
Once a year (%)	15.8	12.3
Never (%)	35.2	52.3
Total (N)	196	65

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	21.3	18.2
3: Some (%)	21.8	30.3
2: A little (%)	13.7	22.7
1: None at all (%)	43.1	28.8
Total (N)	197	66

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.9
4: Very likely (%)	9.1	12.1
3: Somewhat likely (%)	14.2	21.2
2: Not very likely (%)	20.8	13.6
1: Not at all likely (%)	55.8	53.0
Total (N)	197	66

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	55.9	54.4
more than 60 hrs (%)	16.8	18.2
51 to 60 hrs (%)	45.3	33.3
41 to 50 hrs (%)	35.3	39.4
40 hrs or less (%)	2.6	9.1
Total (N)	190	66

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	25.5	29.9
more than 50% of time (%)	10.2	16.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	27.6	28.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	28.1	19.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	16.3	15.2
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.7	9.1
0% of time (%)	6.1	10.6
Total (N)	196	66

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	27.7	20.3
Yes (%)	72.3	79.7
Total (N)	184	59

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	63.6	57.6
Yes (%)	36.4	42.4
Total (N)	184	59

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	26.1	23.7
Yes (%)	73.9	76.3
Total (N)	184	59

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	67.4	69.5
Yes (%)	32.6	30.5
Total (N)	184	59

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	16.3	30.5
Yes (%)	83.7	69.5
Total (N)	184	59

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.4	6.2
26% to 50% of time (%)	1.0	1.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.1	15.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	20.4	10.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	41.8	40.9
0% of time (%)	29.6	31.8
Total (N)	196	66

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	29.0	24.4
Yes (%)	71.0	75.6
Total (N)	138	45

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	35.5	24.4
Yes (%)	64.5	75.6
Total (N)	138	45

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	36.4	29.1
more than 50% of time (%)	25.0	16.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	36.2	31.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.0	18.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.6	6.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	3.6	9.1
0% of time (%)	5.6	18.2
Total (N)	196	66

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.6	1.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.5	1.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	0.5	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.0	1.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	2.6	3.0
0% of time (%)	94.4	93.9
Total (N)	196	66

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	17.3	15.5
more than 50% of time (%)	11.7	10.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	14.8	10.6
11% to 25% of time (%)	8.2	7.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.2	3.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	17.9	15.2
0% of time (%)	38.3	53.0
Total (N)	196	66

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	75.2	77.4
Yes (%)	24.8	22.6
Total (N)	121	31

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	36.4	38.7
Yes (%)	63.6	61.3
Total (N)	121	31

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	64.5	87.1
Yes (%)	35.5	12.9
Total (N)	121	31

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	71.9	90.3
Yes (%)	28.1	9.7
Total (N)	121	31

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	66.1	61.3
Yes (%)	33.9	38.7
Total (N)	121	31

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.3	7.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.5	1.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	13.3	12.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	27.6	27.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	44.4	43.9
0% of time (%)	14.3	15.2
Total (N)	196	66

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	78.6	78.6
Yes (%)	21.4	21.4
Total (N)	168	56

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	18.5	16.1
Yes (%)	81.5	83.9
Total (N)	168	56

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	26.8	28.6
Yes (%)	73.2	71.4
Total (N)	168	56

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	77.4	80.4
Yes (%)	22.6	19.6
Total (N)	168	56

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	64.3	69.6
Yes (%)	35.7	30.4
Total (N)	168	56

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.7	0.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.5	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.0	4.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	12.8	6.1
0% of time (%)	85.7	89.4
Total (N)	196	66

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.2	9.1
more than 50% of time (%)	3.6	4.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.6	7.6
11% to 25% of time (%)	6.1	7.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.6	4.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	15.8	10.6
0% of time (%)	66.3	65.2
Total (N)	196	66

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	54.1	54.5
Yes (%)	45.9	45.5
Total (N)	196	66

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	90.8	87.9
Yes (%)	9.2	12.1
Total (N)	196	66

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	81.6	83.3
Yes (%)	18.4	16.7
Total (N)	196	66

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	87.8	93.9
Yes (%)	12.2	6.1
Total (N)	196	66

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	54.1	77.3
Yes (%)	45.9	22.7
Total (N)	196	66

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	50.5	74.2
Yes (%)	49.5	25.8
Total (N)	196	66

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	98.5	98.5
Yes (%)	1.5	1.5
Total (N)	196	66

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	10.8	12.1
A few times (%)	44.1	42.4
About once per month (%)	20.0	9.1
Two or three times per month (%)	13.8	18.2
At least once per week (%)	11.3	18.2
Total (N)	195	66

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	37.4	51.6
Once or twice (%)	30.8	29.7
Three to five times (%)	15.9	9.4
Six to ten times (%)	5.6	3.1
More than 10 times (%)	10.3	6.3
Total (N)	195	64

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	4.1	9.1
2 (%)	26.7	16.7
3 (%)	31.8	37.9
4 (%)	30.3	21.2
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	7.2	15.2
Total (N)	195	66

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	72.7	71.7
I would not change a thing (%)	27.3	28.3
Total (N)	176	60

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.9	29.7
3: Satisfied (%)	44.6	51.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.4	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	6.3
Total (N)	195	64

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.4	46.8
3: Agree (%)	47.7	35.5
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	12.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	4.8
Total (N)	195	62

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.6	68.9
3: Agree (%)	39.3	31.1
2: Disagree (%)	1.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	191	61

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.4	54.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	40.6
2: Disagree (%)	1.5	4.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	195	64

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.1	43.8
3: Agree (%)	52.3	42.2
2: Disagree (%)	4.6	14.1
Total (N)	195	64

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.9	37.1
3: Agree (%)	53.1	48.4
2: Disagree (%)	12.9	14.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	194	62

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.5	48.4
3: Agree (%)	48.2	31.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	18.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	1.6
Total (N)	195	64

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	19.1	29.8
3: Some (%)	28.9	31.9
2: A little (%)	26.0	17.0
1: None at all (%)	26.0	21.3
Total (N)	173	47

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	32.6	46.4
3: Some (%)	43.2	33.9
2: A little (%)	16.3	16.1
1: None at all (%)	7.9	3.6
Total (N)	190	56

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	9.9	17.9
3: Some (%)	36.5	44.6
2: A little (%)	29.7	16.1
1: None at all (%)	24.0	21.4
Total (N)	192	56

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	26.1	24.1
3: Some (%)	39.9	36.2
2: A little (%)	24.5	29.3
1: None at all (%)	9.6	10.3
Total (N)	188	58

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	13.2	6.8
3: Some (%)	34.2	39.0
2: A little (%)	42.6	40.7
1: None at all (%)	10.0	13.6
Total (N)	190	59

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	2.1	10.3
3: Some (%)	20.0	25.9
2: A little (%)	37.4	27.6
1: None at all (%)	40.5	36.2
Total (N)	190	58

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	7.3	12.7
3: Some (%)	25.0	25.4
2: A little (%)	38.0	34.9
1: None at all (%)	29.7	27.0
Total (N)	192	63

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	13.1	11.1
3: Some (%)	17.8	25.4
2: A little (%)	27.2	20.6
1: None at all (%)	41.9	42.9
Total (N)	191	63

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	9.9	5.4
3: Some (%)	23.1	28.6
2: A little (%)	35.7	21.4
1: None at all (%)	31.3	44.6
Total (N)	182	56

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	43.3	42.2
3: Some (%)	37.6	43.8
2: A little (%)	15.5	7.8
1: None at all (%)	3.6	6.3
Total (N)	194	64

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	35.8	41.3
3: Some (%)	37.8	38.1
2: A little (%)	20.2	17.5
1: None at all (%)	6.2	3.2
Total (N)	193	63

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	16.1	17.0
3: Some (%)	35.1	41.5
2: A little (%)	35.6	34.0
1: None at all (%)	13.2	7.5
Total (N)	174	53

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	7.7	6.6
3: Some (%)	33.5	23.0
2: A little (%)	42.8	45.9
1: None at all (%)	16.0	24.6
Total (N)	194	61

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	16.4	7.4
3: Some (%)	31.1	42.6
2: A little (%)	38.4	25.9
1: None at all (%)	14.1	24.1
Total (N)	177	54

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.0	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	66.0	58.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.5	15.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.5	3.2
Total (N)	194	63

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
A lot more satisfied now (%)	8.8	11.1
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	34.5	39.7
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	22.7	20.6
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	23.7	20.6
A lot less satisfied now (%)	10.3	7.9
Total (N)	194	63

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	16.4	23.8
Yes - not very seriously (%)	18.5	20.6
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	28.7	23.8
Yes - very seriously (%)	36.4	31.7
Total (N)	195	63

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	41.2	41.3
Yes - not very seriously (%)	27.3	28.6
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	17.0	19.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	14.4	11.1
Total (N)	194	63

Back to top

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

Return to CALS Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page