North Carolina State University
1999 Sophomore Student Survey:
College Comparisons Tables
(Academic Environment)

 

Academic Environment
* Faculty contributions
* Intellectual environment
* Overall instruction
* Overall education
* Classroom environment


Academic Environment

Q Faculty Contributions

Set high expectations to learn NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 3.16 3.16 3.22 3.27 3.15 3.13 3.06 3.21 3.10 3.15 3.27
  0.3 0.5 . . 0.3 . . . . 1.1 .
Poor %
Fair % 7.8 8.3 9.3 3.6 9.1 8.9 8.3 7.7 5.9 6.0 6.8
Good % 67.4 65.6 59.3 65.5 66.2 68.9 78.0 63.5 78.4 69.2 59.5
Excellent % 24.4 25.5 31.5 30.9 24.4 22.2 13.8 28.8 15.7 23.6 33.8
Back to top


Respect diverse talents and learning NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.74 2.76 2.74 2.78 2.68 2.80 2.77 2.75 2.61 2.84 2.74
  3.8 5.2 . 3.6 4.8 2.2 0.9 2.0 7.8 1.1 8.1
Poor %
Fair % 29.6 27.1 35.8 27.3 31.8 28.9 29.4 33.3 33.3 26.9 24.3
Good % 55.3 54.7 54.7 56.4 53.7 55.6 61.5 52.9 49.0 58.8 52.7
Excellent % 11.3 13.0 9.4 12.7 9.7 13.3 8.3 11.8 9.8 13.2 14.9
Back to top


Encourage to be actively involved NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.84 2.89 2.96 2.89 2.76 2.82 2.83 3.12 2.69 2.89 2.81
  3.0 2.6 3.7 . 4.3 2.2 0.9 1.9 5.9 2.2 4.1
Poor %
Fair % 25.6 24.0 16.7 27.3 27.6 26.7 27.5 19.2 37.3 23.1 25.7
Good % 55.6 55.7 59.3 56.4 56.3 57.8 58.7 44.2 39.2 58.2 55.4
Excellent % 15.8 17.7 20.4 16.4 11.9 13.3 12.8 34.6 17.6 16.5 14.9
Back to top


Encourage stdnt-fac int. in/out of class NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.79 2.84 2.85 3.00 2.77 2.62 2.64 3.10 2.57 2.80 2.77
  3.9 6.3 5.6 . 4.0 6.7 4.6 . 7.8 1.1 4.1
Poor %
Fair % 30.1 25.0 25.9 27.3 30.7 37.8 37.6 17.3 37.3 30.8 32.4
Good % 49.0 46.9 46.3 45.5 49.4 42.2 46.8 55.8 45.1 55.5 45.9
Excellent % 17.0 21.9 22.2 27.3 15.9 13.3 11.0 26.9 9.8 12.6 17.6
Back to top


Give you frequent and prompt feedback NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.85 2.83 2.91 2.96 2.79 2.71 2.76 3.00 2.88 2.98 2.84
  2.4 4.2 . 1.9 2.8 6.7 . . . 2.2 2.7
Poor %
Fair % 25.9 26.7 27.8 16.7 28.1 28.9 31.2 21.2 21.6 21.4 25.7
Good % 55.9 50.8 53.7 64.8 56.3 51.1 61.5 57.7 68.6 52.2 56.8
Excellent % 15.8 18.3 18.5 16.7 12.8 13.3 7.3 21.2 9.8 24.2 14.9
Back to top


Enc to devote time/energy to coursework NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 3.15 3.16 3.37 3.31 3.12 2.93 3.04 3.31 3.16 3.20 3.04
  0.9 1.0 . . 1.1 2.2 0.9 . 2.0 1.1 .
Poor %
Fair % 13.1 14.6 7.4 7.4 14.2 17.8 17.4 7.7 9.8 9.9 16.2
Good % 56.1 51.6 48.1 53.7 56.3 64.4 58.7 53.8 58.8 56.9 63.5
Excellent % 29.9 32.8 44.4 38.9 28.4 15.6 22.9 38.5 29.4 32.0 20.3
Back to top


Opp. to learn cooperatively w/ students NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.76 2.78 3.11 2.67 2.73 2.82 2.72 2.67 2.59 2.83 2.73
  3.9 6.8 1.9 5.5 5.1 . 1.8 3.8 3.9 1.1 4.1
Poor %
Fair % 30.7 24.5 20.4 36.4 31.8 33.3 34.9 38.5 41.2 28.7 29.7
Good % 50.6 52.6 42.6 43.6 48.3 51.1 53.2 44.2 47.1 56.4 55.4
Excellent % 14.8 16.1 35.2 14.5 14.8 15.6 10.1 13.5 7.8 13.8 10.8
Back to top


Care about academic success and welfare NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.69 2.79 2.83 2.87 2.61 2.69 2.61 2.75 2.51 2.70 2.76
  6.1 5.2 1.9 1.8 6.0 4.4 11.0 7.7 11.8 6.0 4.1
Poor %
Fair % 31.4 28.6 33.3 23.6 36.0 35.6 29.4 25.0 35.3 29.7 28.4
Good % 49.7 48.4 44.4 60.0 48.9 46.7 47.7 51.9 43.1 52.2 55.4
Excellent % 12.7 17.7 20.4 14.5 9.1 13.3 11.9 15.4 9.8 12.1 12.2
Back to top


General eval of instructors on 8 items NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.94 2.95 3.07 3.00 2.91 2.93 2.82 3.10 2.92 2.96 2.92
  0.6 1.0 . . 0.6 . 0.9 . . 0.5 1.4
Poor %
Fair % 17.3 17.7 14.8 10.9 18.5 20.0 20.4 13.5 21.6 14.8 17.6
Good % 69.8 66.1 63.0 78.2 70.7 66.7 74.1 63.5 64.7 73.1 68.9
Excellent % 12.3 15.1 22.2 10.9 10.2 13.3 4.6 23.1 13.7 11.5 12.2
Back to top


Q Intellectual environment
Intellectual environment on this campus NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 3.73 3.73 3.43 3.78 3.80 3.82 3.57 3.77 3.90 3.71 3.68
  0.4 1.1 1.9 . 0.6 . . . . . .
Very weak %
Weak % 3.7 1.6 5.7 3.6 3.4 2.2 5.5 5.8 . 5.5 4.0
Average % 30.0 32.6 41.5 36.4 25.1 26.7 35.8 23.1 29.4 28.7 34.7
Strong % 54.0 53.2 49.1 38.2 56.9 57.8 55.0 59.6 51.0 54.7 50.7
Very strong % 11.9 11.6 1.9 21.8 14.0 13.3 3.7 11.5 19.6 11.0 10.7
Back to top


Q Overall instruction
Overall quality of instruction NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 2.95 2.95 3.00 2.96 2.92 2.95 2.92 3.17 3.00 2.96 2.85
  1.1 0.5 . . 1.7 . . . . 2.2 2.7
Poor %
Fair % 17.2 17.4 13.2 18.5 18.3 20.5 17.4 7.7 21.6 14.3 21.3
Good % 67.3 68.4 73.6 66.7 65.9 63.6 73.4 67.3 56.9 68.7 64.0
Excellent % 14.4 13.7 13.2 14.8 14.0 15.9 9.2 25.0 21.6 14.8 12.0
Back to top


Q Overall education
Overall education receiving at NC State NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
Mean 3.15 3.16 3.17 3.20 3.13 3.24 3.04 3.33 3.29 3.15 3.00
  0.3 . . . 0.3 . . . . 1.1 1.4
Poor %
Fair % 12.0 11.2 9.4 9.1 13.1 6.7 13.8 3.8 15.7 11.5 18.1
Good % 60.2 61.7 64.2 61.8 59.7 62.2 68.8 59.6 39.2 58.8 59.7
Excellent % 27.4 27.1 26.4 29.1 26.9 31.1 17.4 36.5 45.1 28.6 20.8
Back to top


Q Classroom environment
Classes too large to learn effectively NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  24.4 25.7 28.3 21.8 26.8 20.0 19.3 27.5 23.5 23.3 20.3
None %
One % 15.9 13.1 24.5 18.2 15.3 8.9 21.1 13.7 11.8 18.3 13.5
Two % 24.9 28.3 22.6 21.8 23.6 28.9 25.7 25.5 23.5 23.3 27.0
Three % 19.0 15.7 15.1 23.6 18.4 24.4 17.4 25.5 19.6 20.6 20.3
Four or more % 15.7 17.3 9.4 14.5 15.9 17.8 16.5 7.8 21.6 14.4 18.9
Back to top


Classes diff understand instr English NCSU College/School
CALS Design CEP COE CFR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  29.4 31.1 42.6 34.5 20.5 22.7 51.4 21.2 19.6 34.6 25.3
None %
One % 31.2 35.8 27.8 36.4 30.0 18.2 31.2 38.5 17.6 34.1 29.3
Two % 23.7 17.4 16.7 21.8 28.2 36.4 12.8 23.1 37.3 21.8 29.3
Three % 9.9 11.1 11.1 5.5 14.1 9.1 2.8 9.6 15.7 4.5 9.3
Four or more % 5.8 4.7 1.9 1.8 7.2 13.6 1.8 7.7 9.8 5.0 6.7
Back to top


 

 

 
For more information on the 1999 Sophomore Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: March, 2000

Download a Microsoft Excel Version of this report.
Note: Set page size of Excel file to landscape to print with accurate page breaks.

Return to 1999 Sophomore Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page