North Carolina State University
2000 Sophomore Student Survey:
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Frequency Distributions
of Academic Services

Orientation for new students | Academic Advising | Labs and Tutoring Services | Library | Technology | Career-related services | Campus Bookstore

Orientation for new students

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Length of orientation session

4: Excellent

13.0

13.7

12.4

14.6

12.7

14.1

3: Good

59.0

61.3

57.1

68.0

58.2

56.5

2: Fair

23.8

20.7

26.3

14.6

24.4

28.2

1: Poor

4.2

4.3

4.2

2.9

4.7

1.2



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Quality of orientation programs

4: Excellent

12.6

12.5

12.7

18.6

12.1

10.7

3: Good

53.3

55.6

51.5

69.6

51.3

57.1

2: Fair

30.0

30.0

30.0

10.8

32.2

28.6

1: Poor

4.1

1.9

5.8

1.0

4.4

3.6



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Helpfulness of orientation staff

4: Excellent

26.4

28.2

25.0

30.1

26.4

21.4

3: Good

55.5

56.1

55.1

56.3

55.7

52.4

2: Fair

16.1

14.4

17.5

13.6

15.7

23.8

1: Poor

2.0

1.4

2.5

0.0

2.2

2.4



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Orientations accommodations

4: Excellent

15.6

15.4

15.8

22.2

14.7

17.5

3: Good

59.9

61.2

58.9

62.6

60.0

55.0

2: Fair

22.1

21.6

22.4

14.1

22.8

23.8

1: Poor

2.5

1.8

2.9

1.0

2.5

3.8



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Overall effectiveness of orientation

4: Excellent

14.4

15.1

13.8

20.2

13.7

15.3

3: Good

60.5

62.6

58.8

67.3

60.1

56.5

2: Fair

21.5

19.8

22.9

11.5

22.4

23.5

1: Poor

3.6

2.5

4.5

1.0

3.8

4.7

Back to Means by Gender/Ethnicity

Academic Advising

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Access to advisor

4: Excellent

36.9

38.9

35.4

38.2

37.1

33.7

3: Good

39.8

36.6

42.3

39.0

40.5

33.7

2: Fair

16.9

18.5

15.6

17.9

16.2

22.8

1: Poor

6.4

5.9

6.7

4.9

6.2

9.9



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Sufficient time with advisor

4: Excellent

32.7

34.6

31.3

32.5

33.0

29.7

3: Good

37.1

37.9

36.5

40.7

36.5

39.6

2: Fair

21.8

19.6

23.5

18.7

22.4

18.8

1: Poor

8.4

7.9

8.8

8.1

8.1

11.9



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Accurate info on requirements/course sequencing

4: Excellent

37.9

38.5

37.5

35.2

38.7

33.3

3: Good

38.0

36.8

39.0

41.0

37.4

41.2

2: Fair

17.7

17.9

17.5

18.0

17.3

20.6

1: Poor

6.4

6.8

6.1

5.7

6.6

4.9



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Advisor knowledge of policies/procedures

4: Excellent

33.3

32.4

34.1

28.6

34.1

30.6

3: Good

42.7

41.5

43.6

44.5

42.5

42.9

2: Fair

18.1

19.5

17.0

19.3

17.5

22.4

1: Poor

5.9

6.6

5.3

7.6

5.9

4.1



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Academic advising services overall

4: Excellent

32.9

35.1

31.1

32.0

33.3

29.7

3: Good

42.6

40.0

44.6

41.0

42.8

42.6

2: Fair

17.8

18.3

17.5

20.5

17.2

20.8

1: Poor

6.7

6.6

6.8

6.6

6.7

6.9

Back to Means by Gender/Ethnicity

Labs and Tutoring Services

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Lab/tutoring writing

4: Excellent

20.7

23.1

19.0

27.6

18.2

25.0

3: Good

48.6

50.7

47.2

55.2

49.4

35.0

2: Fair

23.4

19.4

26.2

13.8

24.7

30.0

1: Poor

7.3

6.7

7.7

3.4

7.8

10.0



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Lab/tutoring reading

4: Excellent

18.4

19.4

17.9

23.1

16.3

25.0

3: Good

48.6

48.4

48.8

59.0

47.8

40.6

2: Fair

24.3

21.5

25.9

10.3

26.6

28.1

1: Poor

8.6

10.8

7.4

7.7

9.2

6.3



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Lab/tutoring mathematics

4: Excellent

32.5

38.8

27.8

36.0

30.8

40.7

3: Good

48.6

45.9

50.6

48.3

49.8

38.9

2: Fair

15.4

11.8

18.1

14.6

15.4

16.7

1: Poor

3.5

3.5

3.5

1.1

4.0

3.7



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Lab/tutoring study skills

4: Excellent

19.8

23.5

17.5

21.7

20.1

14.7

3: Good

53.5

52.2

54.4

56.7

52.5

55.9

2: Fair

20.4

19.1

21.2

15.0

21.2

23.5

1: Poor

6.2

5.1

6.9

6.7

6.2

5.9



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Labs/tutoring services overall

4: Excellent

24.8

31.0

20.2

29.5

23.7

26.9

3: Good

56.6

57.5

56.0

53.4

58.1

48.1

2: Fair

17.3

10.8

22.2

17.0

17.0

21.2

1: Poor

1.3

0.7

1.7

0.0

1.2

3.8

Back to Means by Gender/Ethnicity

Library

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Library hours of operation

4: Excellent

80.1

80.0

80.1

82.8

79.9

78.8

3: Good

18.8

19.3

18.3

17.2

18.9

19.2

2: Fair

1.1

0.7

1.4

0.0

1.1

2.0

1: Poor

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.0



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Access to databases and collections

4: Excellent

61.1

60.2

61.8

65.0

60.7

60.8

3: Good

34.1

35.2

33.2

31.7

34.3

35.1

2: Fair

4.3

4.2

4.4

2.4

4.6

4.1

1: Poor

0.5

0.4

0.6

0.8

0.5

0.0



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Training to use library

4: Excellent

24.8

27.1

22.9

34.2

23.3

29.9

3: Good

40.6

39.8

41.3

40.5

40.2

44.8

2: Fair

24.7

22.6

26.4

16.2

26.4

16.1

1: Poor

9.9

10.5

9.4

9.0

10.1

9.2



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

library services overall

4: Excellent

51.6

51.3

51.9

55.0

51.1

53.0

3: Good

43.5

43.9

43.3

40.0

44.0

43.0

2: Fair

4.7

4.6

4.7

5.0

4.7

4.0

1: Poor

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.0

Back to Means by Gender/Ethnicity

Technology

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Access to the Internet

4: Excellent

76.9

74.1

79.1

76.0

77.1

75.7

3: Good

20.8

24.6

17.9

24.0

20.6

19.4

2: Fair

2.3

1.4

3.0

0.0

2.3

4.9



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Hrs of operation for comp center labs and help

4: Excellent

52.9

50.0

55.1

59.7

52.1

53.5

3: Good

38.6

41.2

36.7

30.3

39.9

35.6

2: Fair

7.3

7.4

7.2

9.2

6.7

10.9

1: Poor

1.2

1.5

1.0

0.8

1.4

0.0



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Access to up-to-date facilities

4: Excellent

48.5

49.7

47.6

44.0

49.0

48.0

3: Good

44.0

43.8

44.1

47.4

43.6

44.0

2: Fair

6.9

5.9

7.6

8.6

6.6

8.0

1: Poor

0.6

0.6

0.7

0.0

0.8

0.0



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Access to trained staff for help

4: Excellent

22.8

23.2

22.4

21.8

22.9

22.5

3: Good

42.4

41.7

43.0

42.7

43.0

36.0

2: Fair

27.3

26.6

27.8

23.6

26.9

36.0

1: Poor

7.5

8.5

6.8

11.8

7.2

5.6



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Technology training classes

4: Excellent

25.4

23.9

26.3

27.8

25.0

26.2

3: Good

48.0

49.0

47.4

54.4

47.0

50.8

2: Fair

22.5

23.2

22.1

15.2

23.5

21.5

1: Poor

4.1

3.9

4.2

2.5

4.5

1.5



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Technology services overall

4: Excellent

40.1

40.2

40.0

36.4

40.6

39.2

3: Good

55.0

54.6

55.2

57.6

54.8

53.9

2: Fair

4.8

5.0

4.6

5.1

4.6

6.9

1: Poor

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.8

0.1

0.0

Back to Means by Gender/Ethnicity

Career-related Services

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Opportunity for career assistance

4: Excellent

34.1

37.9

30.8

32.7

34.8

29.7

3: Good

52.0

48.9

54.6

52.0

51.5

56.8

2: Fair

11.5

11.0

12.0

14.3

11.1

12.2

1: Poor

2.4

2.1

2.6

1.0

2.7

1.4



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Info on internships/co-op/other

4: Excellent

35.6

37.3

34.2

39.0

35.8

29.5

3: Good

45.9

43.8

47.8

44.8

45.5

51.3

2: Fair

15.7

16.4

15.2

14.3

16.0

15.4

1: Poor

2.7

2.6

2.8

1.9

2.7

3.8



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Resources to explore career options

4: Excellent

32.3

35.6

29.3

32.4

32.7

27.0

3: Good

51.6

49.0

54.0

54.3

50.8

56.8

2: Fair

13.1

12.8

13.4

12.4

13.3

12.2

1: Poor

3.0

2.6

3.3

1.0

3.1

4.1



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Info available through computers/Internet

4: Excellent

40.0

43.8

36.8

44.9

40.0

34.1

3: Good

48.0

45.5

50.2

43.9

48.2

51.2

2: Fair

9.9

8.9

10.8

8.4

9.8

13.4

1: Poor

2.1

1.9

2.2

2.8

2.0

1.2



All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Career-related services overall

4: Excellent

31.6

35.5

28.3

32.7

31.6

30.1

3: Good

54.8

51.8

57.4

54.2

55.0

54.2

2: Fair

11.7

11.1

12.2

13.1

11.4

12.0

1: Poor

1.9

1.6

2.1

0.0

2.0

3.6

Back to Means by Gender/Ethnicity

Campus Bookstore

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

OtherMin

Availability of books/supplies at bookstore

4: Excellent

14.9

15.5

14.3

15.1

14.9

14.0

3: Good

50.0

53.9

46.9

55.5

49.2

52.7

2: Fair

27.7

24.5

30.2

21.8

28.2

29.0

1: Poor

7.5

6.2

8.5

7.6

7.7

4.3

Back to Means by Gender/Ethnicity


For more information on the 2000 Sophomore Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: March, 2001

Download a Microsoft Word Version (Word 6.0 or higher) of this report.
We've named the file .bin so your browser gives you a download window instead of displaying the file. When you download it you can rename it to .doc to indicate that it's a Word file.

Return to 2000 Sophomore Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page