North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

Tables of Results
by Academic Profile

The following tables provide results to questions in Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships, broken down by administrative experience, rank, and tenure status. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between groups (e.g., between tenure-track and non-tenure-track) are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section D by College | Section D by Demographic Profile

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	3.4	50.7	37.2	8.5	3.6	1100

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	3.4	48.0	42.7	5.7	3.5	227
..... Assoc Prof	3.5	55.9	36.2	5.5	2.4	290
..... Full Prof	3.4	54.4	37.3	6.4	1.8	450
..... Lecturer	2.8	31.6	29.3	26.3	12.8	133

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.9	33.2	34.2	22.4	10.2	196
..... TT: Non-Tenured	3.4	52.2	40.8	4.3	2.7	184
..... TT: Tenured	3.5	55.1	37.1	5.7	2.1	720

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	3.3	45.4	40.8	9.5	4.3	813
..... Yes (%)	3.6	65.9	26.8	5.6	1.7	287

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	3.2	40.5	45.1	11.2	3.3	1094

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	3.1	31.8	54.3	10.3	3.6	223
..... Assoc Prof	3.3	42.1	46.2	8.6	3.1	290
..... Full Prof	3.3	46.5	42.8	9.4	1.3	449
..... Lecturer	2.9	31.1	34.8	24.2	9.8	132

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.9	31.1	37.3	23.3	8.3	193
..... TT: Non-Tenured	3.2	33.0	56.6	7.7	2.7	182
..... TT: Tenured	3.3	44.9	44.2	8.8	2.1	719

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	3.1	34.4	48.5	13.1	4.0	807
..... Yes (%)	3.5	57.5	35.5	5.6	1.4	287

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	3.3	45.9	38.3	10.7	5.0	1093

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	3.2	40.6	42.9	13.8	2.7	224
..... Assoc Prof	3.3	49.3	38.2	9.4	3.1	288
..... Full Prof	3.4	54.8	36.7	4.9	3.6	449
..... Lecturer	2.5	17.4	36.4	28.0	18.2	132

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.6	19.1	39.2	27.3	14.4	194
..... TT: Non-Tenured	3.3	45.6	40.1	12.1	2.2	182
..... TT: Tenured	3.4	53.3	37.7	5.9	3.2	717

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	3.2	40.6	40.6	12.8	5.9	807
..... Yes (%)	3.5	60.8	31.8	4.9	2.4	286

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.6	13.1	42.2	31.8	12.9	1088

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.5	12.7	37.7	35.9	13.6	220
..... Assoc Prof	2.6	11.3	44.0	33.3	11.3	291
..... Full Prof	2.6	15.5	44.4	28.3	11.9	446
..... Lecturer	2.4	9.9	38.2	33.6	18.3	131

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.4	9.4	38.7	34.6	17.3	191
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.5	12.8	36.1	37.2	13.9	180
..... TT: Tenured	2.6	14.2	44.6	29.7	11.4	717

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.5	11.5	41.8	33.4	13.3	803
..... Yes (%)	2.7	17.9	43.2	27.4	11.6	285

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.3	7.7	36.1	38.7	17.5	1077

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.3	6.9	31.9	43.1	18.1	216
..... Assoc Prof	2.3	6.9	37.0	39.8	16.3	289
..... Full Prof	2.4	8.8	38.6	35.9	16.7	443
..... Lecturer	2.2	7.0	32.6	38.8	21.7	129

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
Tenure Track Status	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.2	5.3	29.8	43.6	21.3	188
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.3	8.0	34.1	39.8	18.2	176
..... TT: Tenured	2.4	8.3	38.3	37.2	16.3	713

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
A2: Ever held an administrative position	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.3	6.7	35.2	40.1	18.1	796
..... Yes (%)	2.4	10.7	38.8	34.9	15.7	281

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept

	Mean Rating	4: Very familiar (%)	3: Somewhat familiar (%)	2: Not very familiar (%)	1: Not at all familiar (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	3.1	39.1	41.2	15.0	4.7	1096

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Very familiar (%)	3: Somewhat familiar (%)	2: Not very familiar (%)	1: Not at all familiar (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.8	23.5	46.0	22.1	8.4	226
..... Assoc Prof	3.2	40.8	40.8	14.2	4.2	289
..... Full Prof	3.4	49.7	38.5	10.5	1.3	449
..... Lecturer	2.9	26.5	43.2	19.7	10.6	132

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Very familiar (%)	3: Somewhat familiar (%)	2: Not very familiar (%)	1: Not at all familiar (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.8	23.9	43.1	21.8	11.2	197
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.9	25.8	46.2	21.4	6.6	182
..... TT: Tenured	3.3	46.7	39.5	11.4	2.4	717

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Very familiar (%)	3: Somewhat familiar (%)	2: Not very familiar (%)	1: Not at all familiar (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	3.0	29.8	45.1	18.9	6.2	809
..... Yes (%)	3.6	65.5	30.3	3.8	0.3	287

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university

	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.2	4.5	28.4	49.5	17.6	1100

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.0	1.3	21.3	54.2	23.1	225
..... Assoc Prof	2.1	4.1	24.7	51.9	19.2	291
..... Full Prof	2.4	6.2	35.6	45.6	12.6	452
..... Lecturer	2.1	5.3	23.5	49.2	22.0	132

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.0	3.6	21.4	50.5	24.5	196
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.0	1.1	22.0	53.8	23.1	182
..... TT: Tenured	2.3	5.7	31.9	48.1	14.4	722

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.1	2.6	27.3	51.5	18.6	812
..... Yes (%)	2.4	10.1	31.3	43.8	14.9	288

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college

	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.2	3.6	28.4	53.7	14.3	1101

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.1	1.3	23.3	55.5	19.8	227
..... Assoc Prof	2.2	2.7	24.4	58.1	14.8	291
..... Full Prof	2.4	5.5	34.7	50.0	9.7	452
..... Lecturer	2.1	3.1	24.4	53.4	19.1	131

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.1	2.0	25.5	52.0	20.4	196
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.1	1.1	22.4	57.4	19.1	183
..... TT: Tenured	2.3	4.7	30.7	53.2	11.4	722

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.1	2.0	27.3	54.2	16.6	814
..... Yes (%)	2.4	8.4	31.7	52.3	7.7	287

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department

	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.5	11.5	38.1	41.1	9.3	1102

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.5	7.5	39.0	44.7	8.8	228
..... Assoc Prof	2.4	8.6	37.8	42.6	11.0	291
..... Full Prof	2.7	16.6	39.5	37.0	6.9	451
..... Lecturer	2.3	7.6	32.6	45.5	14.4	132

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.4	7.6	36.5	43.1	12.7	197
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.4	6.5	37.0	46.7	9.8	184
..... TT: Tenured	2.6	13.9	38.8	39.1	8.2	721

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.4	7.5	38.1	43.7	10.7	814
..... Yes (%)	2.8	22.9	38.2	33.7	5.2	288

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department

	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.9	27.0	42.8	23.7	6.5	1101

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.8	17.6	52.0	24.7	5.7	227
..... Assoc Prof	2.9	23.6	46.6	22.3	7.5	292
..... Full Prof	3.1	37.6	36.4	21.8	4.2	450
..... Lecturer	2.6	14.4	40.2	31.8	13.6	132

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.6	16.2	41.6	29.9	12.2	197
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.8	16.4	53.6	24.6	5.5	183
..... TT: Tenured	3.0	32.6	40.4	21.8	5.3	721

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Very well (%)	3: Fairly well (%)	2: Not very well (%)	1: Not at all (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.8	19.5	46.4	26.3	7.7	814
..... Yes (%)	3.3	48.1	32.4	16.4	3.1	287

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.7	13.6	48.3	29.7	8.4	1088

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.7	10.3	56.5	27.4	5.8	223
..... Assoc Prof	2.7	12.7	47.5	32.0	7.7	284
..... Full Prof	2.7	17.8	46.9	26.9	8.4	450
..... Lecturer	2.4	6.9	41.2	38.2	13.7	131

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.5	9.9	44.5	34.0	11.5	191
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.7	8.3	56.4	29.8	5.5	181
..... TT: Tenured	2.7	15.9	47.3	28.5	8.2	716

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.6	11.1	46.2	33.9	8.8	803
..... Yes (%)	2.9	20.7	54.4	17.9	7.0	285

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	3.3	45.2	40.8	10.2	3.8	1096

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	3.3	42.3	45.4	9.3	3.1	227
..... Assoc Prof	3.3	46.2	41.0	8.6	4.1	290
..... Full Prof	3.4	52.9	35.5	8.5	3.1	448
..... Lecturer	2.9	21.4	50.4	21.4	6.9	131

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	3.0	30.1	48.2	17.1	4.7	193
..... TT: Non-Tenured	3.2	39.7	46.2	9.8	4.3	184
..... TT: Tenured	3.4	50.6	37.4	8.5	3.5	719

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	3.2	41.5	42.9	11.5	4.2	812
..... Yes (%)	3.4	55.6	34.9	6.7	2.8	284

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	3.1	38.9	38.3	14.9	7.9	1077

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	3.2	46.0	36.7	11.9	5.3	226
..... Assoc Prof	3.1	38.7	39.7	14.5	7.1	282
..... Full Prof	3.1	41.0	39.4	12.9	6.8	442
..... Lecturer	2.6	19.7	33.9	28.3	18.1	127

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.8	30.0	33.7	21.6	14.7	190
..... TT: Non-Tenured	3.2	41.5	39.9	13.7	4.9	183
..... TT: Tenured	3.1	40.6	39.1	13.5	6.8	704

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	3.0	35.7	39.5	16.5	8.3	795
..... Yes (%)	3.2	47.9	34.8	10.6	6.7	282

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.7	15.1	48.6	26.6	9.8	974

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.8	18.3	48.2	25.4	8.1	197
..... Assoc Prof	2.7	13.4	50.8	27.2	8.7	254
..... Full Prof	2.7	15.3	47.9	25.4	11.4	413
..... Lecturer	2.6	12.7	46.4	31.8	9.1	110

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
Tenure Track Status	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.7	14.5	48.8	28.3	8.4	166
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.7	16.4	49.1	26.4	8.2	159
..... TT: Tenured	2.7	14.9	48.4	26.2	10.5	649

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
A2: Ever held an administrative position	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.7	15.9	47.2	27.0	9.9	710
..... Yes (%)	2.7	12.9	52.3	25.4	9.5	264

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.5	8.7	44.3	33.5	13.6	759

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.6	10.0	51.4	30.7	7.9	140
..... Assoc Prof	2.4	6.8	41.4	34.6	17.3	191
..... Full Prof	2.5	9.2	43.6	33.2	13.9	337
..... Lecturer	2.5	8.8	41.8	36.3	13.2	91

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
Tenure Track Status	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.5	9.4	43.3	35.4	11.8	127
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.6	8.8	53.1	31.9	6.2	113
..... TT: Tenured	2.4	8.5	42.6	33.3	15.6	519

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.5	9.2	46.6	30.1	14.0	534
..... Yes (%)	2.4	7.6	38.7	41.3	12.4	225

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.4	5.9	43.8	38.4	11.9	730

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.6	9.0	50.8	32.8	7.4	122
..... Assoc Prof	2.3	3.8	38.0	41.8	16.3	184
..... Full Prof	2.4	5.9	42.6	39.7	11.8	340
..... Lecturer	2.5	6.0	51.2	33.3	9.5	84

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
Tenure Track Status	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.5	6.2	49.6	35.4	8.8	113
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.6	8.9	52.5	31.7	6.9	101
..... TT: Tenured	2.4	5.2	40.9	40.3	13.6	516

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Excellent (%)	3: Good (%)	2: Fair (%)	1: Poor (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.5	5.9	47.4	34.4	12.2	508
..... Yes (%)	2.4	5.9	35.6	47.3	11.3	222

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.5	7.9	53.1	25.0	14.1	725

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.7	3.8	70.2	19.2	6.7	104
..... Assoc Prof	2.5	8.7	49.5	29.3	12.5	208
..... Full Prof	2.4	7.4	47.3	26.5	18.8	351
..... Lecturer	2.9	14.5	69.4	11.3	4.8	62

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.9	11.7	70.2	11.7	6.4	94
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.7	6.4	66.7	21.8	5.1	78
..... TT: Tenured	2.5	7.4	48.3	27.7	16.6	553

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.6	7.9	56.5	22.4	13.3	496
..... Yes (%)	2.5	7.9	45.9	30.6	15.7	229

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.6	9.4	51.7	25.0	14.0	693

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
Rank*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.8	8.6	67.6	16.2	7.6	105
..... Assoc Prof	2.5	9.4	48.7	29.3	12.6	191
..... Full Prof	2.5	9.2	45.7	26.7	18.4	337
..... Lecturer	2.9	11.7	66.7	16.7	5.0	60

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.8	10.0	70.0	14.4	5.6	90
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.7	9.0	62.8	20.5	7.7	78
..... TT: Tenured	2.5	9.3	46.9	27.4	16.4	525

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.6	9.5	55.7	21.5	13.3	474
..... Yes (%)	2.5	9.1	42.9	32.4	15.5	219

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me

	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.3	6.1	39.6	32.5	21.8	671

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.5	5.4	49.5	33.3	11.8	93
..... Assoc Prof	2.2	7.0	33.0	37.3	22.7	185
..... Full Prof	2.3	5.8	41.2	30.9	22.1	330
..... Lecturer	2.2	6.3	36.5	25.4	31.7	63

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
Tenure Track Status	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.2	4.7	38.4	27.9	29.1	86
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.5	6.8	47.9	37.0	8.2	73
..... TT: Tenured	2.3	6.3	38.7	32.6	22.5	512

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
A2: Ever held an administrative position	Mean Rating	4: Strongly agree (%)	3: Agree (%)	2: Disagree (%)	1: Strongly disagree (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.3	5.9	41.1	30.8	22.2	455
..... Yes (%)	2.3	6.5	36.6	36.1	20.8	216

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures

	Mean Rating	4: Very effective (%)	3: Somewhat effective (%)	2: Not very effective (%)	1: Not at all effective (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	2.8	17.0	51.8	21.1	10.1	388

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Very effective (%)	3: Somewhat effective (%)	2: Not very effective (%)	1: Not at all effective (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	2.7	17.8	46.7	24.4	11.1	45
..... Assoc Prof	2.7	14.5	50.9	21.8	12.7	110
..... Full Prof	2.8	17.9	54.1	19.9	8.2	196
..... Lecturer	2.8	18.9	48.6	21.6	10.8	37

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
Tenure Track Status	Mean Rating	4: Very effective (%)	3: Somewhat effective (%)	2: Not very effective (%)	1: Not at all effective (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	2.8	18.0	52.0	22.0	8.0	50
..... TT: Non-Tenured	2.7	17.1	45.7	22.9	14.3	35
..... TT: Tenured	2.8	16.8	52.5	20.8	9.9	303

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
A2: Ever held an administrative position	Mean Rating	4: Very effective (%)	3: Somewhat effective (%)	2: Not very effective (%)	1: Not at all effective (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	2.7	15.7	51.2	21.3	11.8	254
..... Yes (%)	2.9	19.4	53.0	20.9	6.7	134

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution

	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total(N)
Total(N)	3.4	52.6	39.0	7.1	1.3	1087

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
Rank	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor	3.5	52.7	42.4	4.0	0.9	224
..... Assoc Prof	3.4	53.3	39.1	6.6	1.0	289
..... Full Prof	3.4	49.5	39.2	9.2	2.0	444
..... Lecturer	3.6	61.5	32.3	6.2	.	130

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
Tenure Track Status*	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track	3.5	60.4	33.3	5.2	1.0	192
..... TT: Non-Tenured	3.5	51.1	45.6	3.3	.	182
..... TT: Tenured	3.4	50.9	38.8	8.6	1.7	713

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
A2: Ever held an administrative position*	Mean Rating	4: Very important (%)	3: Somewhat important (%)	2: Not very important (%)	1: Not at all important (%)	Total(N)
..... No (%)	3.4	52.8	39.9	5.8	1.5	805
..... Yes (%)	3.4	52.1	36.5	10.6	0.7	282

Continue to Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

View These Results by College

View These Results by Demographic Profile