North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships
Tables of Results
by College
The following tables provide results to questions in D: Faculty-Administration Relationships, broken down by college. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between colleges are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.
Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section D by Academic Profile | Section D by Demographic Profile
D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 3.4 | 50.7 | 37.2 | 8.5 | 3.6 | 1100 |
| D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.4 | 51.6 | 40.3 | 6.2 | 1.8 | 273 |
| ..... CED | 3.7 | 73.1 | 23.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 3.1 | 44.6 | 32.6 | 14.7 | 8.0 | 224 |
| ..... CNR | 3.6 | 61.7 | 33.3 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 60 |
| ..... COE | 3.4 | 53.5 | 35.0 | 9.6 | 1.9 | 157 |
| ..... COM | 3.3 | 45.5 | 43.6 | 3.6 | 7.3 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 3.5 | 63.0 | 25.9 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 3.2 | 39.2 | 48.6 | 9.5 | 2.7 | 74 |
| ..... Design | 3.5 | 60.0 | 36.0 | . | 4.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 3.4 | 62.5 | 12.5 | 25.0 | . | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 3.4 | 47.8 | 43.5 | 7.0 | 1.7 | 115 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 3.1 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 13.3 | 6.7 | 30 |
D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 3.2 | 40.5 | 45.1 | 11.2 | 3.3 | 1094 |
| D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.3 | 41.1 | 44.8 | 12.6 | 1.5 | 270 |
| ..... CED | 3.6 | 67.3 | 28.8 | . | 3.8 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 3.0 | 35.1 | 40.1 | 17.1 | 7.7 | 222 |
| ..... CNR | 3.5 | 48.3 | 48.3 | 3.3 | . | 60 |
| ..... COE | 3.3 | 42.8 | 49.7 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 159 |
| ..... COM | 3.1 | 35.2 | 51.9 | 5.6 | 7.4 | 54 |
| ..... COT | 3.4 | 59.3 | 29.6 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 3.1 | 28.8 | 50.7 | 17.8 | 2.7 | 73 |
| ..... Design | 3.5 | 52.0 | 44.0 | 4.0 | . | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 3.5 | 62.5 | 25.0 | 12.5 | . | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 3.1 | 31.6 | 53.5 | 13.2 | 1.8 | 114 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 3.2 | 40.0 | 43.3 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 30 |
D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 3.3 | 45.9 | 38.3 | 10.7 | 5.0 | 1093 |
| D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.5 | 54.3 | 37.9 | 6.7 | 1.1 | 269 |
| ..... CED | 3.5 | 63.5 | 23.1 | 11.5 | 1.9 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 3.1 | 44.6 | 33.3 | 12.6 | 9.5 | 222 |
| ..... CNR | 3.4 | 52.5 | 39.0 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 59 |
| ..... COE | 3.1 | 35.4 | 46.2 | 13.9 | 4.4 | 158 |
| ..... COM | 3.3 | 49.1 | 34.5 | 10.9 | 5.5 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 3.1 | 44.4 | 33.3 | 14.8 | 7.4 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 3.2 | 37.8 | 48.6 | 8.1 | 5.4 | 74 |
| ..... Design | 3.2 | 44.0 | 40.0 | 4.0 | 12.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 3.4 | 37.5 | 62.5 | . | . | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 3.2 | 42.1 | 41.2 | 13.2 | 3.5 | 114 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.7 | 26.7 | 30.0 | 26.7 | 16.7 | 30 |
D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.6 | 13.1 | 42.2 | 31.8 | 12.9 | 1088 |
| D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.6 | 15.2 | 42.4 | 33.1 | 9.3 | 269 |
| ..... CED | 2.6 | 21.6 | 31.4 | 33.3 | 13.7 | 51 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.5 | 11.7 | 44.6 | 28.8 | 14.9 | 222 |
| ..... CNR | 2.8 | 15.3 | 57.6 | 22.0 | 5.1 | 59 |
| ..... COE | 2.4 | 8.8 | 39.0 | 36.5 | 15.7 | 159 |
| ..... COM | 3.0 | 23.6 | 60.0 | 7.3 | 9.1 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 2.0 | . | 26.9 | 50.0 | 23.1 | 26 |
| ..... CVM | 2.7 | 16.2 | 47.3 | 25.7 | 10.8 | 74 |
| ..... Design | 2.2 | 8.0 | 32.0 | 32.0 | 28.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 2.1 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.4 | 10.8 | 35.1 | 41.4 | 12.6 | 111 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.3 | 6.9 | 37.9 | 37.9 | 17.2 | 29 |
D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.3 | 7.7 | 36.1 | 38.7 | 17.5 | 1077 |
| D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.4 | 9.0 | 38.6 | 40.4 | 12.0 | 267 |
| ..... CED | 2.5 | 19.6 | 29.4 | 29.4 | 21.6 | 51 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.2 | 5.5 | 31.3 | 39.2 | 24.0 | 217 |
| ..... CNR | 2.6 | 10.0 | 48.3 | 31.7 | 10.0 | 60 |
| ..... COE | 2.2 | 5.7 | 34.8 | 36.7 | 22.8 | 158 |
| ..... COM | 2.4 | 7.4 | 37.0 | 38.9 | 16.7 | 54 |
| ..... COT | 2.4 | . | 51.9 | 37.0 | 11.1 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 2.4 | 8.2 | 32.9 | 47.9 | 11.0 | 73 |
| ..... Design | 2.2 | 8.7 | 34.8 | 26.1 | 30.4 | 23 |
| ..... FYC | 2.1 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.3 | 6.4 | 35.5 | 41.8 | 16.4 | 110 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.4 | 6.9 | 44.8 | 34.5 | 13.8 | 29 |
D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept
| Mean Rating | 4: Very familiar (%) |
3: Somewhat familiar (%) |
2: Not very familiar (%) |
1: Not at all familiar (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 3.1 | 39.1 | 41.2 | 15.0 | 4.7 | 1096 |
| D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Very familiar (%) |
3: Somewhat familiar (%) |
2: Not very familiar (%) |
1: Not at all familiar (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.1 | 39.7 | 37.1 | 18.4 | 4.8 | 272 |
| ..... CED | 3.5 | 61.5 | 28.8 | 9.6 | . | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 3.0 | 32.4 | 45.9 | 15.3 | 6.3 | 222 |
| ..... CNR | 3.0 | 26.7 | 53.3 | 16.7 | 3.3 | 60 |
| ..... COE | 3.4 | 49.1 | 43.4 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 159 |
| ..... COM | 2.9 | 24.1 | 53.7 | 14.8 | 7.4 | 54 |
| ..... COT | 3.7 | 65.4 | 34.6 | . | . | 26 |
| ..... CVM | 2.9 | 28.0 | 37.3 | 30.7 | 4.0 | 75 |
| ..... Design | 3.4 | 60.0 | 28.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 4.0 | 100.0 | . | . | . | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 3.0 | 30.7 | 43.9 | 17.5 | 7.9 | 114 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 3.3 | 48.3 | 34.5 | 17.2 | . | 29 |
D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university
| Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.2 | 4.5 | 28.4 | 49.5 | 17.6 | 1100 |
| D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.3 | 5.9 | 31.1 | 49.8 | 13.2 | 273 |
| ..... CED | 2.3 | 3.8 | 32.7 | 55.8 | 7.7 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.2 | 4.5 | 26.8 | 49.6 | 19.2 | 224 |
| ..... CNR | 2.1 | 3.3 | 21.3 | 59.0 | 16.4 | 61 |
| ..... COE | 2.0 | 1.3 | 22.2 | 47.5 | 29.1 | 158 |
| ..... COM | 2.3 | 7.3 | 32.7 | 40.0 | 20.0 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 2.1 | . | 22.2 | 70.4 | 7.4 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 2.2 | 6.7 | 25.3 | 52.0 | 16.0 | 75 |
| ..... Design | 2.3 | 4.0 | 32.0 | 52.0 | 12.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 2.0 | . | 25.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.3 | 6.3 | 36.6 | 42.0 | 15.2 | 112 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.1 | 3.3 | 26.7 | 43.3 | 26.7 | 30 |
D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college
| Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.2 | 3.6 | 28.4 | 53.7 | 14.3 | 1101 |
| D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.3 | 4.8 | 32.2 | 52.7 | 10.3 | 273 |
| ..... CED | 2.4 | 3.8 | 32.7 | 59.6 | 3.8 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.2 | 4.0 | 27.2 | 52.2 | 16.5 | 224 |
| ..... CNR | 2.2 | . | 32.8 | 52.5 | 14.8 | 61 |
| ..... COE | 2.0 | 1.3 | 16.4 | 59.1 | 23.3 | 159 |
| ..... COM | 2.3 | 5.5 | 30.9 | 49.1 | 14.5 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 2.2 | . | 25.9 | 66.7 | 7.4 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 2.3 | 4.0 | 36.0 | 49.3 | 10.7 | 75 |
| ..... Design | 2.5 | 12.0 | 36.0 | 44.0 | 8.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 2.1 | . | 25.0 | 62.5 | 12.5 | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.3 | 4.5 | 28.6 | 54.5 | 12.5 | 112 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 1.9 | . | 23.3 | 46.7 | 30.0 | 30 |
D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department
| Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.5 | 11.5 | 38.1 | 41.1 | 9.3 | 1102 |
| D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.6 | 13.1 | 40.9 | 39.8 | 6.2 | 274 |
| ..... CED | 2.6 | 11.5 | 38.5 | 46.2 | 3.8 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.5 | 11.2 | 38.4 | 38.4 | 12.1 | 224 |
| ..... CNR | 2.5 | 8.2 | 45.9 | 34.4 | 11.5 | 61 |
| ..... COE | 2.3 | 7.6 | 27.8 | 53.2 | 11.4 | 158 |
| ..... COM | 2.5 | 7.3 | 49.1 | 32.7 | 10.9 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 2.5 | 7.4 | 44.4 | 40.7 | 7.4 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 2.8 | 24.0 | 34.7 | 37.3 | 4.0 | 75 |
| ..... Design | 2.6 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 40.0 | 8.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 2.4 | 12.5 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 12.5 | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.5 | 9.7 | 40.7 | 39.8 | 9.7 | 113 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.2 | 6.7 | 30.0 | 43.3 | 20.0 | 30 |
D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department
| Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.9 | 27.0 | 42.8 | 23.7 | 6.5 | 1101 |
| D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Very well (%) |
3: Fairly well (%) |
2: Not very well (%) |
1: Not at all (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.0 | 28.9 | 44.0 | 22.7 | 4.4 | 273 |
| ..... CED | 2.8 | 17.3 | 46.2 | 30.8 | 5.8 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.9 | 30.5 | 41.3 | 20.2 | 8.1 | 223 |
| ..... CNR | 2.9 | 26.2 | 44.3 | 18.0 | 11.5 | 61 |
| ..... COE | 2.8 | 17.0 | 47.2 | 31.4 | 4.4 | 159 |
| ..... COM | 2.9 | 25.5 | 49.1 | 18.2 | 7.3 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 2.9 | 25.9 | 44.4 | 22.2 | 7.4 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 3.3 | 50.0 | 31.1 | 17.6 | 1.4 | 74 |
| ..... Design | 2.8 | 36.0 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 12.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 2.3 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 14.3 | 7 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.8 | 20.0 | 47.8 | 25.2 | 7.0 | 115 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.6 | 23.3 | 33.3 | 23.3 | 20.0 | 30 |
D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.7 | 13.6 | 48.3 | 29.7 | 8.4 | 1088 |
| D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.7 | 14.4 | 50.2 | 28.4 | 7.0 | 271 |
| ..... CED | 2.6 | 7.8 | 52.9 | 29.4 | 9.8 | 51 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.6 | 16.9 | 43.4 | 27.4 | 12.3 | 219 |
| ..... CNR | 2.8 | 11.7 | 58.3 | 25.0 | 5.0 | 60 |
| ..... COE | 2.5 | 7.0 | 46.5 | 38.9 | 7.6 | 157 |
| ..... COM | 2.5 | 10.9 | 41.8 | 36.4 | 10.9 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 2.7 | 11.5 | 53.8 | 26.9 | 7.7 | 26 |
| ..... CVM | 3.0 | 23.0 | 55.4 | 20.3 | 1.4 | 74 |
| ..... Design | 2.6 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 32.0 | 16.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 2.0 | . | 12.5 | 75.0 | 12.5 | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.7 | 10.6 | 56.6 | 28.3 | 4.4 | 113 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.6 | 24.1 | 31.0 | 24.1 | 20.7 | 29 |
D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 3.3 | 45.2 | 40.8 | 10.2 | 3.8 | 1096 |
| D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) | 1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.4 | 52.6 | 38.7 | 7.3 | 1.5 | 274 |
| ..... CED | 3.4 | 51.9 | 38.5 | 5.8 | 3.8 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 3.1 | 39.8 | 39.4 | 16.3 | 4.5 | 221 |
| ..... CNR | 3.6 | 63.3 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 60 |
| ..... COE | 3.2 | 37.6 | 49.7 | 10.2 | 2.5 | 157 |
| ..... COM | 3.3 | 43.6 | 47.3 | 1.8 | 7.3 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 3.1 | 40.7 | 40.7 | 11.1 | 7.4 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 3.3 | 45.9 | 44.6 | 5.4 | 4.1 | 74 |
| ..... Design | 3.0 | 32.0 | 40.0 | 20.0 | 8.0 | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 3.3 | 57.1 | 14.3 | 28.6 | . | 7 |
| ..... PAMS | 3.3 | 43.9 | 41.2 | 11.4 | 3.5 | 114 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.7 | 26.7 | 33.3 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 30 |
D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin
| Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 3.1 | 38.9 | 38.3 | 14.9 | 7.9 | 1077 |
| D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.2 | 42.6 | 40.8 | 13.6 | 3.0 | 265 |
| ..... CED | 3.2 | 46.2 | 28.8 | 21.2 | 3.8 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.9 | 35.2 | 32.9 | 20.4 | 11.6 | 216 |
| ..... CNR | 3.3 | 46.7 | 36.7 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 60 |
| ..... COE | 2.9 | 27.6 | 48.1 | 15.4 | 9.0 | 156 |
| ..... COM | 3.1 | 40.7 | 37.0 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 54 |
| ..... COT | 2.8 | 29.6 | 33.3 | 22.2 | 14.8 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 3.5 | 56.2 | 38.4 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 73 |
| ..... Design | 2.8 | 29.2 | 37.5 | 12.5 | 20.8 | 24 |
| ..... FYC | 3.0 | 28.6 | 57.1 | . | 14.3 | 7 |
| ..... PAMS | 3.2 | 43.4 | 40.7 | 8.8 | 7.1 | 113 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.3 | 20.0 | 16.7 | 33.3 | 30.0 | 30 |
D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin
| Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.7 | 15.1 | 48.6 | 26.6 | 9.8 | 974 |
| D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.7 | 17.1 | 46.9 | 23.6 | 12.4 | 258 |
| ..... CED | 2.6 | 19.2 | 32.7 | 36.5 | 11.5 | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.6 | 10.7 | 51.2 | 29.8 | 8.3 | 168 |
| ..... CNR | 3.0 | 28.6 | 42.9 | 25.0 | 3.6 | 56 |
| ..... COE | 2.7 | 8.7 | 54.8 | 31.7 | 4.8 | 126 |
| ..... COM | 2.5 | 9.1 | 49.1 | 27.3 | 14.5 | 55 |
| ..... COT | 2.6 | 7.4 | 48.1 | 37.0 | 7.4 | 27 |
| ..... CVM | 2.9 | 20.5 | 54.8 | 16.4 | 8.2 | 73 |
| ..... Design | 2.6 | 12.5 | 45.8 | 29.2 | 12.5 | 24 |
| ..... FYC | 3.1 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 14.3 | . | 7 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.7 | 17.8 | 49.5 | 19.8 | 12.9 | 101 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.5 | 11.1 | 40.7 | 37.0 | 11.1 | 27 |
D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin
| Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.5 | 8.7 | 44.3 | 33.5 | 13.6 | 759 |
| D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.6 | 13.2 | 48.8 | 27.8 | 10.2 | 205 |
| ..... CED | 2.6 | 9.1 | 54.5 | 27.3 | 9.1 | 33 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.2 | 6.0 | 30.7 | 40.7 | 22.7 | 150 |
| ..... CNR | 2.7 | 17.4 | 50.0 | 21.7 | 10.9 | 46 |
| ..... COE | 2.4 | 4.0 | 47.5 | 36.6 | 11.9 | 101 |
| ..... COM | 2.5 | 5.9 | 50.0 | 35.3 | 8.8 | 34 |
| ..... COT | 2.4 | . | 55.6 | 33.3 | 11.1 | 18 |
| ..... CVM | 2.3 | 4.3 | 38.3 | 36.2 | 21.3 | 47 |
| ..... Design | 2.5 | 15.8 | 31.6 | 42.1 | 10.5 | 19 |
| ..... FYC | 2.7 | 14.3 | 42.9 | 42.9 | . | 7 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.5 | 7.9 | 46.1 | 34.2 | 11.8 | 76 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.5 | 4.3 | 52.2 | 34.8 | 8.7 | 23 |
D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin
| Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.4 | 5.9 | 43.8 | 38.4 | 11.9 | 730 |
| D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Excellent (%) |
3: Good (%) |
2: Fair (%) |
1: Poor (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.6 | 9.1 | 47.5 | 36.4 | 7.1 | 198 |
| ..... CED | 2.6 | 8.6 | 54.3 | 25.7 | 11.4 | 35 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.1 | 4.3 | 28.4 | 45.4 | 22.0 | 141 |
| ..... CNR | 2.5 | 8.0 | 44.0 | 36.0 | 12.0 | 50 |
| ..... COE | 2.4 | 3.0 | 44.6 | 37.6 | 14.9 | 101 |
| ..... COM | 2.5 | 3.6 | 50.0 | 42.9 | 3.6 | 28 |
| ..... COT | 2.7 | . | 66.7 | 33.3 | . | 18 |
| ..... CVM | 2.3 | . | 43.9 | 39.0 | 17.1 | 41 |
| ..... Design | 2.4 | . | 50.0 | 43.8 | 6.3 | 16 |
| ..... FYC | 2.6 | 14.3 | 28.6 | 57.1 | . | 7 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.5 | 8.2 | 46.6 | 34.2 | 11.0 | 73 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.6 | 4.5 | 54.5 | 40.9 | . | 22 |
D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) |
1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.5 | 7.9 | 53.1 | 25.0 | 14.1 | 725 |
| D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) |
1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.6 | 8.5 | 55.0 | 23.5 | 13.0 | 200 |
| ..... CED | 2.8 | 8.1 | 67.6 | 18.9 | 5.4 | 37 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.5 | 7.4 | 46.7 | 31.1 | 14.8 | 122 |
| ..... CNR | 2.5 | 10.4 | 50.0 | 22.9 | 16.7 | 48 |
| ..... COE | 2.4 | 4.7 | 48.6 | 29.9 | 16.8 | 107 |
| ..... COM | 2.5 | 9.1 | 51.5 | 15.2 | 24.2 | 33 |
| ..... COT | 2.9 | 10.0 | 70.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 20 |
| ..... CVM | 2.3 | 6.1 | 34.7 | 40.8 | 18.4 | 49 |
| ..... Design | 2.7 | 10.0 | 60.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 20 |
| ..... FYC | 3.0 | . | 100.0 | . | . | 3 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.6 | 6.3 | 57.8 | 21.9 | 14.1 | 64 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 3.1 | 18.2 | 77.3 | 4.5 | . | 22 |
D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) |
1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.6 | 9.4 | 51.7 | 25.0 | 14.0 | 693 |
| D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) |
1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.6 | 10.4 | 53.9 | 22.3 | 13.5 | 193 |
| ..... CED | 2.7 | 11.1 | 55.6 | 27.8 | 5.6 | 36 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.5 | 9.2 | 45.4 | 28.6 | 16.8 | 119 |
| ..... CNR | 2.6 | 11.4 | 50.0 | 22.7 | 15.9 | 44 |
| ..... COE | 2.5 | 7.0 | 48.0 | 29.0 | 16.0 | 100 |
| ..... COM | 2.5 | 15.6 | 40.6 | 25.0 | 18.8 | 32 |
| ..... COT | 2.9 | 5.3 | 84.2 | 10.5 | . | 19 |
| ..... CVM | 2.2 | 4.3 | 39.1 | 32.6 | 23.9 | 46 |
| ..... Design | 2.7 | 16.7 | 50.0 | 22.2 | 11.1 | 18 |
| ..... FYC | 3.0 | . | 100.0 | . | . | 3 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.6 | 5.0 | 56.7 | 26.7 | 11.7 | 60 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 3.1 | 17.4 | 73.9 | 8.7 | . | 23 |
D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me
| Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) |
1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.3 | 6.1 | 39.6 | 32.5 | 21.8 | 671 |
| D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment | Mean Rating | 4: Strongly agree (%) |
3: Agree (%) |
2: Disagree (%) |
1: Strongly disagree (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.4 | 7.5 | 45.7 | 29.0 | 17.7 | 186 |
| ..... CED | 2.5 | 6.5 | 51.6 | 32.3 | 9.7 | 31 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.1 | 6.8 | 28.8 | 30.5 | 33.9 | 118 |
| ..... CNR | 2.3 | 7.3 | 36.6 | 39.0 | 17.1 | 41 |
| ..... COE | 2.2 | 3.0 | 37.6 | 34.7 | 24.8 | 101 |
| ..... COM | 2.3 | 9.1 | 36.4 | 30.3 | 24.2 | 33 |
| ..... COT | 2.6 | 5.0 | 65.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 20 |
| ..... CVM | 2.0 | . | 27.3 | 50.0 | 22.7 | 44 |
| ..... Design | 2.3 | 13.3 | 26.7 | 33.3 | 26.7 | 15 |
| ..... FYC | 2.7 | . | 66.7 | 33.3 | . | 3 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.3 | 3.4 | 42.4 | 35.6 | 18.6 | 59 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 2.7 | 15.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 10.0 | 20 |
D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures
| Mean Rating | 4: Very effective (%) |
3: Somewhat effective (%) |
2: Not very effective (%) |
1: Not at all effective (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 2.8 | 17.0 | 51.8 | 21.1 | 10.1 | 388 |
| D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment* | Mean Rating | 4: Very effective (%) |
3: Somewhat effective (%) |
2: Not very effective (%) |
1: Not at all effective (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 2.8 | 17.0 | 52.1 | 23.4 | 7.4 | 94 |
| ..... CED | 2.5 | 10.5 | 36.8 | 42.1 | 10.5 | 19 |
| ..... CHASS | 2.6 | 12.9 | 51.6 | 17.7 | 17.7 | 62 |
| ..... CNR | 3.0 | 25.0 | 54.2 | 20.8 | . | 24 |
| ..... COE | 2.7 | 6.8 | 61.0 | 23.7 | 8.5 | 59 |
| ..... COM | 3.0 | 27.3 | 50.0 | 18.2 | 4.5 | 22 |
| ..... COT | 3.0 | 27.3 | 54.5 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 11 |
| ..... CVM | 2.6 | 20.6 | 35.3 | 23.5 | 20.6 | 34 |
| ..... Design | 2.6 | 21.4 | 35.7 | 28.6 | 14.3 | 14 |
| ..... FYC | 3.0 | . | 100.0 | . | . | 1 |
| ..... PAMS | 2.9 | 16.7 | 63.9 | 11.1 | 8.3 | 36 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 3.3 | 41.7 | 50.0 | 8.3 | . | 12 |
D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution
| Mean Rating | 4: Very important (%) |
3: Somewhat important (%) |
2: Not very important (%) |
1: Not at all important (%) |
Total(N) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total(N) | 3.4 | 52.6 | 39.0 | 7.1 | 1.3 | 1087 |
| D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| College of appointment | Mean Rating | 4: Very important (%) |
3: Somewhat important (%) |
2: Not very important (%) |
1: Not at all important (%) |
Total(N) |
| ..... CALS | 3.4 | 45.9 | 45.9 | 7.0 | 1.1 | 270 |
| ..... CED | 3.5 | 55.8 | 40.4 | 3.8 | . | 52 |
| ..... CHASS | 3.5 | 61.4 | 31.8 | 5.9 | 0.9 | 220 |
| ..... CNR | 3.4 | 49.2 | 42.4 | 6.8 | 1.7 | 59 |
| ..... COE | 3.5 | 54.1 | 39.0 | 5.0 | 1.9 | 159 |
| ..... COM | 3.3 | 46.3 | 35.2 | 16.7 | 1.9 | 54 |
| ..... COT | 3.5 | 53.6 | 42.9 | . | 3.6 | 28 |
| ..... CVM | 3.5 | 58.1 | 36.5 | 5.4 | . | 74 |
| ..... Design | 3.5 | 52.0 | 44.0 | 4.0 | . | 25 |
| ..... FYC | 3.5 | 62.5 | 25.0 | 12.5 | . | 8 |
| ..... PAMS | 3.3 | 45.0 | 39.4 | 12.8 | 2.8 | 109 |
| ..... Student Affairs | 3.6 | 65.5 | 27.6 | 6.9 | . | 29 |
Continue to Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism
View These Results by Academic Profile
View These Results by Demographic Profile
To download an MS Word document with Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu
Posted: January, 2007
Return to Annotated Questionnaire
Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page