North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Design
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	35.3	50.0
..... Yes (%)	64.7	50.0
Total (N)	17	10

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	58.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	10.0
Total (N)	17	10

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	30.0
3: Agree (%)	47.1	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.6	10.0
Total (N)	17	10

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	20.0
3: Agree (%)	56.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	10.0
Total (N)	16	10

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	25.0	22.2
4: Strong (%)	56.3	55.6
3: Average (%)	18.8	11.1
2: Weak (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	26.7	28.6
4: Strong (%)	33.3	28.6
3: Average (%)	26.7	28.6
2: Weak (%)	6.7	.
1: Very weak (%)	6.7	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	5.9	.
4: Strong (%)	41.2	33.3
3: Average (%)	35.3	66.7
2: Weak (%)	5.9	.
1: Very weak (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	9

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	23.5	12.5
4: Strong (%)	11.8	75.0
3: Average (%)	52.9	12.5
2: Weak (%)	5.9	.
1: Very weak (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	8

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strong (%)	29.4	42.9
3: Average (%)	52.9	42.9
2: Weak (%)	11.8	14.3
1: Very weak (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	11.8	.
4: Strong (%)	29.4	33.3
3: Average (%)	47.1	55.6
2: Weak (%)	5.9	11.1
1: Very weak (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	9

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
5: Very strong (%)	6.3	.
4: Strong (%)	12.5	14.3
3: Average (%)	37.5	57.1
2: Weak (%)	25.0	28.6
1: Very weak (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	7

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.5
A (%)	50.0	60.0
B (%)	50.0	30.0
C (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	16	10

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	3.9
A (%)	29.4	30.0
B (%)	41.2	40.0
C (%)	29.4	20.0
D (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	17	10

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.3
A (%)	52.9	40.0
B (%)	41.2	50.0
C (%)	5.9	10.0
Total (N)	17	10

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	41.2	30.0
B (%)	41.2	60.0
C (%)	17.6	.
D (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	17	10

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.7
A (%)	52.9	70.0
B (%)	47.1	30.0
Total (N)	17	10

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.4
A (%)	52.9	40.0
B (%)	47.1	60.0
Total (N)	17	10

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	35.3	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	41.2	20.0
No clear vision (%)	23.5	30.0
Total (N)	17	10

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	50.0	42.9
Total (N)	12	7

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	35.3	77.8
Vision with slow progress (%)	47.1	22.2
No clear vision (%)	17.6	.
Total (N)	17	9

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	64.7	77.8
Change for the worse (%)	11.8	11.1
Not really change (%)	23.5	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	47.1	55.6
Change for the worse (%)	.	11.1
Not really change (%)	52.9	33.3
Total (N)	17	9

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	47.1	44.4
Change for the worse (%)	17.6	22.2
Not really change (%)	35.3	33.3
Total (N)	17	9

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	31.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	31.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	37.5	44.4
2: Fair (%)	12.5	11.1
1: Poor (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	16	9

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	25.0
3: Good (%)	43.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	6.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	25.0	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	.
3: Good (%)	43.8	57.1
2: Fair (%)	31.3	28.6
1: Poor (%)	6.3	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	37.5
2: Fair (%)	26.7	.
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	62.5
2: Fair (%)	13.3	.
1: Poor (%)	33.3	37.5
Total (N)	15	8

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	13.3	22.2
2: Fair (%)	13.3	22.2
1: Poor (%)	33.3	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	12.5
3: Good (%)	46.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	6.7	.
1: Poor (%)	40.0	37.5
Total (N)	15	8

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	12.5
3: Good (%)	46.7	25.0
2: Fair (%)	26.7	50.0
1: Poor (%)	20.0	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	12.5
3: Good (%)	26.7	37.5
2: Fair (%)	33.3	37.5
1: Poor (%)	13.3	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	42.9	66.7
3: Good (%)	35.7	11.1
2: Fair (%)	7.1	.
1: Poor (%)	14.3	22.2
Total (N)	14	9

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	62.5
3: Good (%)	28.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	14.3	.
1: Poor (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	8

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	26.7	22.2
2: Fair (%)	6.7	11.1
1: Poor (%)	26.7	22.2
Total (N)	15	9

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	50.0
3: Good (%)	20.0	25.0
2: Fair (%)	26.7	12.5
1: Poor (%)	20.0	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	53.3	75.0
3: Good (%)	26.7	12.5
2: Fair (%)	13.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	40.0	66.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	6.7	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	22.2
3: Good (%)	40.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	20.0	22.2
1: Poor (%)	33.3	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	22.2
3: Good (%)	33.3	44.4
2: Fair (%)	33.3	22.2
1: Poor (%)	26.7	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	55.6
3: Good (%)	53.3	22.2
2: Fair (%)	33.3	22.2
Total (N)	15	9

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	60.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	13.3	22.2
1: Poor (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	9

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	35.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	35.7	11.1
1: Poor (%)	21.4	22.2
Total (N)	14	9

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	.	44.4
3: Good (%)	60.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	26.7	11.1
1: Poor (%)	13.3	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	.
3: Good (%)	64.3	44.4
2: Fair (%)	28.6	44.4
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	14	9

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	11.1
3: Good (%)	42.9	44.4
2: Fair (%)	35.7	33.3
1: Poor (%)	14.3	11.1
Total (N)	14	9

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	88.9
3: Good (%)	26.7	11.1
2: Fair (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	9

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	46.7	77.8
3: Good (%)	33.3	11.1
2: Fair (%)	13.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	9

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	66.7
3: Good (%)	46.7	11.1
2: Fair (%)	33.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	55.6
3: Good (%)	33.3	22.2
2: Fair (%)	33.3	.
1: Poor (%)	13.3	22.2
Total (N)	15	9

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	55.6
3: Good (%)	26.7	22.2
2: Fair (%)	26.7	11.1
1: Poor (%)	6.7	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	41.7	25.0
1: Poor (%)	8.3	25.0
Total (N)	12	8

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8
3: Good (%)	50.0	20.0
2: Fair (%)	50.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	.	40.0
Total (N)	8	5

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
3: Good (%)	91.7	87.5
2: Fair (%)	8.3	.
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	12	8

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	16.7
3: Good (%)	54.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	9.1	16.7
1: Poor (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	11	6

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	12.5
3: Good (%)	58.3	62.5
2: Fair (%)	.	12.5
1: Poor (%)	8.3	12.5
Total (N)	12	8

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	16.7
3: Good (%)	61.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	15.4	16.7
1: Poor (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	13	6

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	.
3: Good (%)	69.2	42.9
2: Fair (%)	15.4	28.6
1: Poor (%)	7.7	28.6
Total (N)	13	7

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	12.5
3: Good (%)	30.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	25.0
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	13	8

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	77.8
3: Agree (%)	43.8	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	9

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	66.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	9

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	55.6
3: Agree (%)	43.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	9

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	22.2
3: Agree (%)	37.5	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.3	22.2
Total (N)	16	9

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	43.8	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	42.9
Total (N)	16	7

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Very familiar (%)	62.5	55.6
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	31.3	22.2
2: Not very familiar (%)	6.3	11.1
1: Not at all familiar (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very well (%)	6.3	.
3: Fairly well (%)	31.3	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	43.8	66.7
1: Not at all (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	9

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very well (%)	18.8	.
3: Fairly well (%)	25.0	55.6
2: Not very well (%)	43.8	44.4
1: Not at all (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	9

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very well (%)	12.5	33.3
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	22.2
2: Not very well (%)	37.5	44.4
1: Not at all (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	9

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very well (%)	37.5	33.3
3: Fairly well (%)	18.8	22.2
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	44.4
1: Not at all (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	9

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	22.2
3: Agree (%)	43.8	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	16	9

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	43.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	20.0	22.2
Total (N)	15	9

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	22.2
3: Good (%)	46.7	44.4
2: Fair (%)	33.3	22.2
1: Poor (%)	13.3	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	14.3
3: Good (%)	25.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	41.7	42.9
1: Poor (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	7

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
3: Good (%)	53.8	33.3
2: Fair (%)	38.5	66.7
1: Poor (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	3

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.4	.
Total (N)	14	6

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	41.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	6

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	22.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	16.7
Total (N)	9	6

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very effective (%)	20.0	25.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	40.0	25.0
2: Not very effective (%)	30.0	25.0
1: Not at all effective (%)	10.0	25.0
Total (N)	10	4

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Very important (%)	43.8	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	9

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Very important (%)	75.0	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	18.8	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	9

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Very important (%)	73.3	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.7	33.3
Total (N)	15	9

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	.
3: Agree (%)	28.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	55.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	9

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	.
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	44.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	57.1
3: Agree (%)	43.8	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	6

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	88.9
3: Agree (%)	37.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	85.7
3: Agree (%)	57.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	88.9
3: Agree (%)	37.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	9

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	80.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	5

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	88.9
3: Agree (%)	40.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	9

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	87.5
3: Agree (%)	18.8	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	87.5
3: Agree (%)	41.7	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	8

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	85.7
3: Agree (%)	35.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	7

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	100.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.
Total (N)	12	7

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	100.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	.
Total (N)	10	5

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	.
Total (N)	15	8

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	100.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.
Total (N)	12	7

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.
Total (N)	12	8

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.9
4: A great deal (%)	31.3	87.5
3: Some (%)	31.3	12.5
2: A little (%)	31.3	.
1: Not at all (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	44.4
3: Some (%)	53.3	55.6
2: A little (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	9

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: A great deal (%)	56.3	66.7
3: Some (%)	18.8	22.2
2: A little (%)	18.8	11.1
1: None (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	9

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	31.3	33.3
2: A little (%)	18.8	22.2
1: None (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.3
3: Some (%)	31.3	11.1
2: A little (%)	25.0	11.1
1: None (%)	43.8	77.8
Total (N)	16	9

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	.
3: Some (%)	37.5	66.7
2: A little (%)	18.8	11.1
1: None (%)	25.0	22.2
Total (N)	16	9

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	.
3: Some (%)	37.5	11.1
2: A little (%)	25.0	44.4
1: None (%)	25.0	44.4
Total (N)	16	9

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	40.0	11.1
3: Some (%)	26.7	22.2
2: A little (%)	13.3	22.2
1: None (%)	20.0	44.4
Total (N)	15	9

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	31.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.8	87.5
3: Agree (%)	25.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	62.5
3: Agree (%)	56.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	42.9	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	62.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	8

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	12.5
3: Agree (%)	18.2	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	54.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	25.0
Total (N)	11	8

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	31.3	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	8

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3
Frequently (%)	12.5	50.0
Sometimes (%)	56.3	37.5
Seldom (%)	18.8	.
Never (%)	12.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
Frequently (%)	25.0	50.0
Sometimes (%)	43.8	25.0
Seldom (%)	25.0	12.5
Never (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8
Frequently (%)	31.3	75.0
Sometimes (%)	56.3	25.0
Seldom (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
Frequently (%)	50.0	62.5
Sometimes (%)	25.0	.
Seldom (%)	18.8	37.5
Never (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.6
Frequently (%)	6.3	12.5
Sometimes (%)	12.5	62.5
Seldom (%)	50.0	.
Never (%)	31.3	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
Frequently (%)	43.8	62.5
Sometimes (%)	37.5	37.5
Seldom (%)	12.5	.
Never (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
Frequently (%)	25.0	25.0
Sometimes (%)	37.5	37.5
Seldom (%)	12.5	25.0
Never (%)	25.0	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
Frequently (%)	6.3	12.5
Sometimes (%)	50.0	37.5
Seldom (%)	31.3	25.0
Never (%)	12.5	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
Frequently (%)	43.8	25.0
Sometimes (%)	12.5	12.5
Seldom (%)	18.8	25.0
Never (%)	25.0	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	66.7	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	60.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	15	8

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	60.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	86.7	75.0
3: Satisfied (%)	13.3	25.0
Total (N)	15	8

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.3	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	73.3	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.7	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	8

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	46.2	28.6
Total (N)	13	7

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	46.2	28.6
Total (N)	13	7

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	42.9
3: Agree (%)	50.0	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	7

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	28.6
3: Agree (%)	53.3	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	6

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	.
3: Agree (%)	31.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	42.9
3: Agree (%)	50.0	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
3: Agree (%)	40.0	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	26.7	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	5

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	14	8

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	12.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	87.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.6	.
Total (N)	14	8

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	7

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	40.0	33.3
Total (N)	15	6

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.8	.
Total (N)	13	7

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.
Total (N)	13	3

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.4	37.5
Total (N)	14	8

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.7	28.6
Total (N)	15	7

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	5

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	28.6
Total (N)	15	7

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.0	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	57.1
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	7

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	64.3	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.4	.
Total (N)	14	5

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	6.3	37.5
No (%)	87.5	62.5
Don't know (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	3.7
4: Very helpful (%)	100.0	66.7
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	1	3

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	62.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	40.0
Total (N)	8	5

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	20.0
Total (N)	7	5

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	57.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	7	3

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	6	3

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	8	4

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	8	3

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	75.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.6	.
Total (N)	7	4

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	40.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	26.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	42.9
3: Agree (%)	28.6	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	46.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	6

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	15	6

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	40.0
3: Agree (%)	53.3	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	20.0
Total (N)	15	5

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	26.7	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	40.0	16.7
Total (N)	15	6

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	33.3
3: Agree (%)	28.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	16.7
Total (N)	14	6

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
4: Very well (%)	50.0	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	31.3	62.5
2: Not very well (%)	18.8	12.5
1: Not at all (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	25.0	37.5
Yes (%)	75.0	62.5
Total (N)	16	8

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	37.5	37.5
Yes (%)	62.5	62.5
Total (N)	16	8

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	31.3	50.0
Yes (%)	68.8	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	100.0	87.5
Yes (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very well (%)	43.8	37.5
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	62.5
2: Not very well (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	8

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Very well (%)	50.0	37.5
3: Fairly well (%)	25.0	37.5
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	12.5
1: Not at all (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	40.0
3: Agree (%)	30.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.1	.
Total (N)	13	5

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	25.0
3: Agree (%)	21.4	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.4	.
Total (N)	14	4

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	16.7
Total (N)	14	6

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3
3: Agree (%)	23.1	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	53.8	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.1	14.3
Total (N)	13	7

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	6

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	14	6

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.
Total (N)	11	6

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	40.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	64.3	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	60.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	7

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	14	6

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	6

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	6

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	68.8	62.5
No experience (%)	31.3	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	81.3	87.5
Yes (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	93.8	87.5
Yes (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	14	5

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
3: Agree (%)	53.3	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	71.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	7

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	16.7
3: Agree (%)	38.5	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	38.5	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	.
Total (N)	13	6

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	41.7	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	7

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	41.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	5

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	5

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	20.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	3

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	30.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	83.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	6

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	37.5
3: Agree (%)	66.7	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	12	8

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	58.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	12	7

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	.	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	64.3	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	28.6	42.9
Total (N)	14	7

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	8	4

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	10.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.0	60.0
Total (N)	10	5

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very well (%)	31.3	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	25.0	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	12.5
1: Not at all (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	40.0
3: Agree (%)	53.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	5

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	56.3	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	35.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	40.0
Total (N)	14	5

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	83.3	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0
Total (N)	12	4

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	2

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	62.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
3: Agree (%)	66.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	62.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	8

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
3: Agree (%)	80.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	66.7	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.7	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	4.0
4: Very important (%)	66.7	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	.
Total (N)	15	8

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9
4: Very important (%)	66.7	87.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.0	12.5
2: Not very important (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	8

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	60.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	.
2: Not very important (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9
4: Very important (%)	80.0	87.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	13.3	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	80.0	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	13.3	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	43.8	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	12.5
3: Agree (%)	37.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.3	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	16.7
Total (N)	12	6

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	12.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	12.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	50.0
Total (N)	15	8

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	8

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	16	8

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	5	3

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	6	4

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	43.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	6

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	60.0
Total (N)	12	5

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	12	7

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	20.0
Total (N)	12	5

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	50.0
Total (N)	10	4

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.5
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	50.0
Total (N)	7	2

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9
4: A lot (%)	18.8	12.5
3: Some (%)	25.0	12.5
2: A little (%)	31.3	25.0
1: None at all (%)	25.0	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very likely (%)	18.8	25.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	43.8	25.0
2: Not very likely (%)	18.8	25.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	18.8	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	33.3
Total (N)	12	3

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	50.0
Total (N)	11	2

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	33.3
Total (N)	7	3

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	5

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	5	1

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	1.5
Once a week or more (%)	31.3	.
A few times a month (%)	12.5	12.5
A few times a semester (%)	18.8	.
Once a semester (%)	6.3	.
Never (%)	31.3	87.5
Total (N)	16	8

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	1.0
A few times a month (%)	6.7	.
A few times a semester (%)	40.0	.
Once a semester (%)	13.3	.
Once a year (%)	6.7	.
Never (%)	33.3	100.0
Total (N)	15	7

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.4
A few times a semester (%)	31.3	12.5
Once a year (%)	12.5	.
Never (%)	56.3	87.5
Total (N)	16	8

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	3.9
Once a week or more (%)	12.5	.
A few times a month (%)	25.0	37.5
A few times a semester (%)	37.5	12.5
Once a semester (%)	12.5	50.0
Never (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.0
Once a week or more (%)	6.3	.
A few times a month (%)	12.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	12.5	.
Once a semester (%)	6.3	.
Once a year (%)	12.5	.
Never (%)	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	16	8

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	62.5
3: Some (%)	6.3	25.0
2: A little (%)	50.0	.
1: None at all (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.0
4: Very likely (%)	6.3	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	31.3	.
2: Not very likely (%)	6.3	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	56.3	100.0
Total (N)	16	8

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	56.1	56.1
more than 60 hrs (%)	33.3	28.6
51 to 60 hrs (%)	26.7	28.6
41 to 50 hrs (%)	20.0	28.6
40 hrs or less (%)	20.0	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	45.1	48.8
more than 50% of time (%)	25.0	25.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	68.8	62.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	12.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	6.3	12.5
Yes (%)	93.8	87.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	43.8	50.0
Yes (%)	56.3	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	25.0	50.0
Yes (%)	75.0	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	62.5
Yes (%)	12.5	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	25.0	25.0
Yes (%)	75.0	75.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.5	8.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.5	12.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	43.8	37.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	43.8	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	.	12.5
Yes (%)	100.0	87.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	6.3	37.5
Yes (%)	93.8	62.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	12.3	12.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	12.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	31.3	25.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	56.3	37.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	12.5	12.5
0% of time (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.1	7.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.3	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	18.8	25.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	12.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	43.8	25.0
0% of time (%)	31.3	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.7	4.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.3	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	12.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.3	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	37.5	37.5
0% of time (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	8	4

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	8	4

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	100.0
Yes (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	8	4

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	50.0
Yes (%)	12.5	50.0
Total (N)	8	4

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	100.0
Yes (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	8	4

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	12.3	13.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	12.5	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.5	62.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	50.0	12.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	25.0	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	68.8	50.0
Yes (%)	31.3	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	.	12.5
Yes (%)	100.0	87.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	56.3	50.0
Yes (%)	43.8	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	37.5
Yes (%)	50.0	62.5
Total (N)	16	8

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.6	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.3	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	25.0	.
0% of time (%)	68.8	100.0
Total (N)	16	8

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.6	5.1
26% to 50% of time (%)	12.5	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.5	12.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.3	25.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.3	12.5
0% of time (%)	62.5	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	56.3	62.5
Yes (%)	43.8	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	81.3	62.5
Yes (%)	18.8	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	100.0	87.5
Yes (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	68.8	75.0
Yes (%)	31.3	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	62.5	37.5
Yes (%)	37.5	62.5
Total (N)	16	8

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	100.0
Yes (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	6.3	.
A few times (%)	50.0	62.5
About once per month (%)	6.3	25.0
Two or three times per month (%)	25.0	.
At least once per week (%)	12.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	56.3	50.0
Once or twice (%)	25.0	25.0
Three to five times (%)	18.8	.
Six to ten times (%)	.	12.5
More than 10 times (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	6.3	.
2 (%)	25.0	25.0
3 (%)	37.5	.
4 (%)	12.5	62.5
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	78.6	87.5
I would not change a thing (%)	21.4	12.5
Total (N)	14	8

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.8	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	8

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	12.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	8

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.8	100.0
3: Agree (%)	31.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	75.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	62.5
3: Agree (%)	43.8	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	8

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	31.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	57.1
3: Some (%)	25.0	14.3
2: A little (%)	33.3	.
1: None at all (%)	8.3	28.6
Total (N)	12	7

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	20.0	25.0
3: Some (%)	46.7	37.5
2: A little (%)	20.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	13.3	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	25.0
3: Some (%)	31.3	12.5
2: A little (%)	18.8	12.5
1: None at all (%)	31.3	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	31.3	37.5
3: Some (%)	43.8	25.0
2: A little (%)	18.8	12.5
1: None at all (%)	6.3	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	31.3	37.5
3: Some (%)	25.0	37.5
2: A little (%)	31.3	12.5
1: None at all (%)	12.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	.
3: Some (%)	6.3	25.0
2: A little (%)	18.8	25.0
1: None at all (%)	62.5	50.0
Total (N)	16	8

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	31.3	25.0
3: Some (%)	18.8	12.5
2: A little (%)	31.3	50.0
1: None at all (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	37.5	25.0
3: Some (%)	12.5	25.0
2: A little (%)	12.5	37.5
1: None at all (%)	37.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	25.0
3: Some (%)	25.0	12.5
2: A little (%)	25.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	37.5	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.6
4: A great deal (%)	31.3	75.0
3: Some (%)	43.8	12.5
2: A little (%)	18.8	12.5
1: None at all (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	37.5	37.5
3: Some (%)	25.0	50.0
2: A little (%)	37.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	.	12.5
3: Some (%)	14.3	37.5
2: A little (%)	50.0	37.5
1: None at all (%)	35.7	12.5
Total (N)	14	8

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	12.5
3: Some (%)	31.3	37.5
2: A little (%)	31.3	25.0
1: None at all (%)	25.0	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	28.6
3: Some (%)	25.0	14.3
2: A little (%)	37.5	42.9
1: None at all (%)	18.8	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
A lot more satisfied now (%)	25.0	.
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	25.0	62.5
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	12.5	25.0
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	18.8	.
A lot less satisfied now (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	6.3	12.5
Yes - not very seriously (%)	25.0	37.5
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	18.8	25.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	50.0	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	43.8	37.5
Yes - not very seriously (%)	31.3	25.0
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	12.5	.
Yes - very seriously (%)	12.5	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007