NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section B: Image and Vision

College Results
Tenure Track Faculty
(Tenured and Probationary)


The following tables provide results to questions in Section B: Image and Vision, broken down by college for tenure track faculty only. For exact question wording for this section, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | College Results for all Faculty


To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section B only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.


A2: Ever held an administrative position

  ..... No (%) ..... Yes
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 71.1 28.9 927

A2: Ever held an administrative position ..... No (%) ..... Yes
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 74.0 26.0 254
..... CALS
..... CED 72.7 27.3 44
..... CHASS 58.8 41.2 153
..... CNR 80.8 19.2 52
..... COE 73.3 26.7 150
..... COM 73.3 26.7 45
..... COT 70.4 29.6 27
..... CVM 78.5 21.5 65
..... Design 40.7 59.3 27
..... PAMS 76.7 23.3 103
..... Student Affairs 60.0 40.0 5
Back to Top

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 29.7 52.1 14.3 3.8 915

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.2 34.8 48.8 13.6 2.8 250
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 18.6 65.1 11.6 4.7 43
..... CHASS 3.1 28.8 52.3 14.4 4.6 153
..... CNR 3.0 26.9 51.9 17.3 3.8 52
..... COE 3.0 25.2 55.1 16.3 3.4 147
..... COM 2.9 22.2 51.1 17.8 8.9 45
..... COT 3.2 34.6 50.0 11.5 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.1 31.3 45.3 21.9 1.6 64
..... Design 2.9 18.5 59.3 11.1 11.1 27
..... PAMS 3.2 35.6 54.5 6.9 3.0 101
..... Student Affairs 3.2 40.0 40.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 21.7 48.0 23.0 7.3 908

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.0 25.6 49.2 20.4 4.8 250
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 23.3 46.5 18.6 11.6 43
..... CHASS 2.8 18.4 48.0 23.7 9.9 152
..... CNR 2.9 24.0 52.0 16.0 8.0 50
..... COE 2.7 16.7 49.3 25.7 8.3 144
..... COM 2.6 11.6 44.2 32.6 11.6 43
..... COT 2.6 11.1 48.1 29.6 11.1 27
..... CVM 3.0 25.0 50.0 21.9 3.1 64
..... Design 2.7 22.2 37.0 25.9 14.8 27
..... PAMS 3.0 27.7 45.5 23.8 3.0 101
..... Student Affairs 2.8 20.0 40.0 40.0 . 5
Back to Top

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 19.8 49.9 23.1 7.2 890

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.0 27.6 49.4 18.9 4.1 243
..... CALS
..... CED 2.7 16.3 51.2 23.3 9.3 43
..... CHASS 2.6 14.8 40.3 34.9 10.1 149
..... CNR 2.9 21.6 54.9 17.6 5.9 51
..... COE 2.9 21.3 51.1 23.4 4.3 141
..... COM 2.6 7.1 61.9 16.7 14.3 42
..... COT 3.1 30.8 50.0 15.4 3.8 26
..... CVM 2.6 9.2 52.3 27.7 10.8 65
..... Design 2.8 19.2 53.8 15.4 11.5 26
..... PAMS 2.8 16.5 51.5 23.7 8.2 97
..... Student Affairs 3.2 20.0 80.0 . . 5
Back to Top

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.8 22.5 40.9 30.8 5.0 0.8 779

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.9 27.9 39.1 25.6 6.0 1.4 215
..... CALS
..... CED 3.6 22.2 22.2 44.4 11.1 . 27
..... CHASS 3.6 16.5 31.5 47.2 4.7 . 127
..... CNR 4.0 29.4 47.1 17.6 5.9 . 51
..... COE 3.8 15.6 51.0 29.3 3.4 0.7 147
..... COM 3.3 4.8 35.7 45.2 11.9 2.4 42
..... COT 4.3 48.1 40.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 27
..... CVM 4.2 33.3 50.0 16.7 . . 12
..... Design 4.0 24.0 56.0 16.0 4.0 . 25
..... PAMS 3.8 22.2 41.4 34.3 2.0 . 99
..... Student Affairs 4.6 60.0 40.0 . . . 5
Back to Top

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.7 20.5 41.9 28.9 7.5 1.2 862

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 4.1 39.2 39.2 15.9 4.5 1.2 245
..... CALS
..... CED 3.5 6.8 38.6 47.7 6.8 . 44
..... CHASS 3.4 5.4 44.6 36.6 13.4 . 112
..... CNR 3.8 15.7 60.8 11.8 9.8 2.0 51
..... COE 3.7 13.4 47.7 33.6 4.7 0.7 149
..... COM 3.4 4.5 40.9 43.2 11.4 . 44
..... COT 4.0 40.7 33.3 14.8 7.4 3.7 27
..... CVM 3.5 21.0 27.4 33.9 17.7 . 62
..... Design 3.6 27.3 31.8 27.3 4.5 9.1 22
..... PAMS 3.6 11.8 42.2 41.2 3.9 1.0 102
..... Student Affairs 2.5 . 50.0 . . 50.0 2
Back to Top

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.8 20.6 43.1 29.8 5.9 0.6 908

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 4.2 42.1 37.7 16.7 3.2 0.4 252
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 6.8 34.1 50.0 9.1 . 44
..... CHASS 3.4 9.7 31.7 46.2 11.7 0.7 145
..... CNR 3.8 15.7 54.9 23.5 5.9 . 51
..... COE 3.7 14.3 51.0 29.9 4.1 0.7 147
..... COM 3.1 . 27.3 54.5 18.2 . 44
..... COT 4.0 29.6 44.4 18.5 7.4 . 27
..... CVM 4.0 21.9 53.1 25.0 . . 64
..... Design 3.3 3.8 38.5 46.2 3.8 7.7 26
..... PAMS 3.8 11.8 61.8 23.5 2.9 . 102
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . . 75.0 25.0 . 4
Back to Top

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.3 11.6 33.0 35.8 15.8 3.9 285

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.7 18.2 45.5 23.4 11.7 1.3 77
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 . 13.3 60.0 26.7 . 15
..... CHASS 3.4 12.1 39.7 31.0 15.5 1.7 58
..... CNR 2.7 . 22.2 38.9 27.8 11.1 18
..... COE 3.2 7.3 24.4 51.2 14.6 2.4 41
..... COM 2.9 . 14.3 57.1 28.6 . 7
..... COT 2.4 . 15.4 23.1 46.2 15.4 13
..... CVM 2.9 8.3 16.7 50.0 8.3 16.7 12
..... Design 3.6 20.0 32.0 40.0 4.0 4.0 25
..... PAMS 3.6 18.8 37.5 31.3 6.3 6.3 16
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . . 100.0 . . 1
Back to Top

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.5 10.0 40.0 37.2 11.0 1.7 580

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.6 14.0 41.5 36.3 8.2 . 171
..... CALS
..... CED 3.5 13.3 40.0 26.7 20.0 . 30
..... CHASS 3.1 3.8 28.8 48.1 15.4 3.8 52
..... CNR 3.4 7.9 39.5 36.8 13.2 2.6 38
..... COE 3.4 10.1 38.7 34.5 16.0 0.8 119
..... COM 3.5 12.9 41.9 32.3 6.5 6.5 31
..... COT 3.7 16.7 45.8 29.2 4.2 4.2 24
..... CVM 3.4 6.5 45.2 32.3 9.7 6.5 31
..... Design 3.1 . 33.3 50.0 12.5 4.2 24
..... PAMS 3.5 5.4 44.6 46.4 3.6 . 56
..... Student Affairs 4.0 . 100.0 . . . 2
Back to Top

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.8 24.6 37.2 31.1 5.5 1.5 775

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 4.3 46.7 35.2 15.9 1.8 0.4 227
..... CALS
..... CED 3.5 7.3 41.5 46.3 4.9 . 41
..... CHASS 3.4 10.5 32.4 43.8 11.4 1.9 105
..... CNR 4.3 50.0 41.3 4.3 2.2 2.2 46
..... COE 3.4 10.1 36.4 42.6 8.5 2.3 129
..... COM 3.2 8.3 25.0 52.8 8.3 5.6 36
..... COT 4.2 44.0 40.0 8.0 8.0 . 25
..... CVM 3.8 22.2 42.6 29.6 1.9 3.7 54
..... Design 3.3 7.7 30.8 50.0 7.7 3.8 26
..... PAMS 3.6 8.9 49.4 35.4 6.3 . 79
..... Student Affairs 3.4 . 40.0 60.0 . . 5
Back to Top

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development

  Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.4 11.3 36.1 39.7 9.4 3.5 637

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development Mean Rating 5: Very
strong (%)
4: Strong
(%)
3: Average
(%)
2: Weak (%)

1: Very weak
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.8 17.2 48.5 28.9 4.9 0.5 204
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 . 21.7 60.9 17.4 . 23
..... CHASS 2.7 . 18.2 49.1 20.0 12.7 55
..... CNR 3.7 21.7 45.7 21.7 6.5 4.3 46
..... COE 3.4 12.0 29.1 44.4 12.8 1.7 117
..... COM 3.0 2.9 22.9 54.3 14.3 5.7 35
..... COT 3.6 15.4 38.5 42.3 . 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.3 6.8 29.5 54.5 4.5 4.5 44
..... Design 2.7 4.3 13.0 43.5 26.1 13.0 23
..... PAMS 3.4 6.7 40.0 43.3 6.7 3.3 60
..... Student Affairs 4.0 . 100.0 . . . 2
Back to Top

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 3.9 19.0 60.8 16.9 2.5 0.8 791

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 3.9 19.9 57.7 17.9 2.5 2.0 201
..... CALS
..... CED 4.3 35.7 53.6 10.7 . . 28
..... CHASS 3.9 12.1 66.4 20.1 1.3 . 149
..... CNR 3.8 13.7 60.8 17.6 3.9 3.9 51
..... COE 3.9 12.8 65.1 18.8 3.4 . 149
..... COM 3.8 2.3 79.1 16.3 2.3 . 43
..... COT 4.3 37.0 55.6 7.4 . . 27
..... CVM 4.0 15.4 69.2 15.4 . . 13
..... Design 4.5 53.8 42.3 3.8 . . 26
..... PAMS 4.0 26.7 52.5 15.8 5.0 . 101
..... Student Affairs 5.0 100.0 . . . . 1
Back to Top

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 4.1 28.9 56.9 12.5 1.2 0.5 888

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 4.2 39.5 48.4 9.7 1.2 1.2 248
..... CALS
..... CED 4.1 27.3 54.5 15.9 2.3 . 44
..... CHASS 4.1 25.4 59.5 14.3 . 0.8 126
..... CNR 4.2 32.7 53.8 11.5 1.9 . 52
..... COE 4.2 27.3 62.7 10.0 . . 150
..... COM 4.1 27.3 59.1 11.4 2.3 . 44
..... COT 4.0 22.2 59.3 18.5 . . 27
..... CVM 4.1 21.5 66.2 10.8 1.5 . 65
..... Design 4.0 29.6 40.7 25.9 3.7 . 27
..... PAMS 3.9 15.7 65.7 15.7 2.9 . 102
..... Student Affairs 5.0 100.0 . . . . 1
Back to Top

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 4.4 48.2 42.8 8.3 0.7 0.1 921

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 4.5 58.3 34.9 6.3 0.4 . 252
..... CALS
..... CED 4.3 38.6 47.7 13.6 . . 44
..... CHASS 4.4 48.0 40.8 9.9 1.3 . 152
..... CNR 4.2 40.4 44.2 13.5 . 1.9 52
..... COE 4.3 38.3 53.0 8.1 0.7 . 149
..... COM 4.1 27.3 56.8 13.6 2.3 . 44
..... COT 4.3 40.7 48.1 11.1 . . 27
..... CVM 4.6 58.5 40.0 1.5 . . 65
..... Design 4.4 48.1 44.4 7.4 . . 27
..... PAMS 4.4 52.9 39.2 6.9 1.0 . 102
..... Student Affairs 4.2 20.0 80.0 . . . 5
Back to Top

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 4.3 41.6 46.9 9.9 1.4 0.1 918

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 4.4 51.0 41.4 6.4 1.2 . 251
..... CALS
..... CED 4.1 29.5 54.5 15.9 . . 44
..... CHASS 4.2 38.8 45.4 13.8 2.0 . 152
..... CNR 4.0 28.8 53.8 11.5 3.8 1.9 52
..... COE 4.2 32.7 57.1 8.8 1.4 . 147
..... COM 3.9 20.5 50.0 27.3 2.3 . 44
..... COT 4.2 29.6 59.3 11.1 . . 27
..... CVM 4.6 60.0 38.5 1.5 . . 65
..... Design 4.2 37.0 48.1 11.1 3.7 . 27
..... PAMS 4.4 52.0 41.2 5.9 1.0 . 102
..... Student Affairs 3.6 . 60.0 40.0 . . 5
Back to Top

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 4.5 52.4 44.2 3.1 0.1 0.2 916

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 4.5 55.4 42.6 2.0 . . 251
..... CALS
..... CED 4.4 46.5 51.2 2.3 . . 43
..... CHASS 4.6 61.8 33.6 3.9 0.7 . 152
..... CNR 4.3 42.3 50.0 7.7 . . 52
..... COE 4.4 47.3 48.0 4.1 . 0.7 148
..... COM 4.3 32.6 65.1 2.3 . . 43
..... COT 4.4 44.4 51.9 3.7 . . 27
..... CVM 4.5 53.8 41.5 4.6 . . 65
..... Design 4.6 59.3 40.7 . . . 27
..... PAMS 4.5 55.4 42.6 1.0 . 1.0 101
..... Student Affairs 4.2 20.0 80.0 . . . 5
Back to Top

B3f: Grade own professional achievement

  Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 4.4 48.8 45.7 5.0 0.2 0.2 916

B3f: Grade own professional achievement Mean Rating A (%)


B (%)


C (%)


D (%)


F (%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 4.5 53.4 41.4 5.2 . . 251
..... CALS
..... CED 4.4 39.5 58.1 2.3 . . 43
..... CHASS 4.5 52.6 40.8 5.9 0.7 . 152
..... CNR 4.3 40.4 53.8 5.8 . . 52
..... COE 4.3 43.2 50.0 5.4 0.7 0.7 148
..... COM 4.3 39.5 53.5 7.0 . . 43
..... COT 4.5 51.9 44.4 3.7 . . 27
..... CVM 4.4 47.7 46.2 6.2 . . 65
..... Design 4.5 48.1 51.9 . . . 27
..... PAMS 4.5 53.5 42.6 3.0 . 1.0 101
..... Student Affairs 4.0 20.0 60.0 20.0 . . 5
Back to Top

B4: Department's vision for the future

  Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals
(%)
Vision with
slow progress
(%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar
(%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 33.6 36.6 26.9 2.9 918

B4: Department's vision for the future Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals
(%)
Vision with
slow progress
(%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar
(%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 32.4 39.6 25.6 2.4 250
..... CALS
..... CED 25.0 40.9 34.1 . 44
..... CHASS 28.5 33.8 36.4 1.3 151
..... CNR 28.8 38.5 26.9 5.8 52
..... COE 27.3 38.0 28.0 6.7 150
..... COM 29.5 34.1 34.1 2.3 44
..... COT 55.6 7.4 37.0 . 27
..... CVM 46.2 30.8 18.5 4.6 65
..... Design 40.7 33.3 25.9 . 27
..... PAMS 46.5 42.6 9.9 1.0 101
..... Student Affairs 20.0 20.0 40.0 20.0 5
Back to Top

B5: Agreement with department vision for future

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.3 38.1 56.7 4.6 0.6 637

B5: Agreement with department vision for future Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 39.0 55.4 5.1 0.6 177
..... CALS
..... CED 3.3 34.5 65.5 . . 29
..... CHASS 3.3 38.3 55.3 5.3 1.1 94
..... CNR 3.4 42.9 57.1 . . 35
..... COE 3.3 27.1 70.8 2.1 . 96
..... COM 3.4 39.3 57.1 3.6 . 28
..... COT 3.6 64.7 35.3 . . 17
..... CVM 3.3 40.0 48.0 10.0 2.0 50
..... Design 3.5 52.6 47.4 . . 19
..... PAMS 3.3 37.1 53.9 7.9 1.1 89
..... Student Affairs 4.0 100.0 . . . 2
Back to Top

B6: College's vision for the future

  Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals
(%)
Vision with
slow progress
(%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar
(%)


Total (N)
Total (N) 21.9 35.8 25.5 16.9 919

B6: College's vision for the future Clear vision;
actively working
toward goals
(%)
Vision with
slow progress
(%)
No clear
vision (%)


Not familiar
(%)


Total (N)
College of appointment 17.9 32.1 36.1 13.9 252
..... CALS
..... CED 50.0 38.6 11.4 . 44
..... CHASS 11.9 35.8 25.8 26.5 151
..... CNR 28.8 28.8 26.9 15.4 52
..... COE 9.4 42.3 23.5 24.8 149
..... COM 22.7 50.0 25.0 2.3 44
..... COT 29.6 33.3 37.0 . 27
..... CVM 41.5 40.0 9.2 9.2 65
..... Design 50.0 38.5 11.5 . 26
..... PAMS 27.5 28.4 17.6 26.5 102
..... Student Affairs 20.0 40.0 20.0 20.0 5
Back to Top

B7a: Department change in next five years

  Change for
the better
(%)
Change for
the worse
(%)
Not really
change (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 57.3 15.6 27.2 917

B7a: Department change in next five years Change for
the better
(%)
Change for
the worse
(%)
Not really
change (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 58.6 16.7 24.7 251
..... CALS
..... CED 75.0 4.5 20.5 44
..... CHASS 49.3 15.3 35.3 150
..... CNR 67.3 13.5 19.2 52
..... COE 64.4 12.8 22.8 149
..... COM 52.3 20.5 27.3 44
..... COT 63.0 18.5 18.5 27
..... CVM 53.8 12.3 33.8 65
..... Design 69.2 11.5 19.2 26
..... PAMS 44.1 22.5 33.3 102
..... Student Affairs 20.0 20.0 60.0 5
Back to Top

B7b: College change in next five years

  Change for
the better
(%)
Change for
the worse
(%)
Not really
change (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 42.9 14.2 42.9 911

B7b: College change in next five years Change for
the better
(%)
Change for
the worse
(%)
Not really
change (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 31.2 18.4 50.4 250
..... CALS
..... CED 70.5 9.1 20.5 44
..... CHASS 38.9 14.8 46.3 149
..... CNR 51.9 11.5 36.5 52
..... COE 55.0 5.4 39.6 149
..... COM 46.5 20.9 32.6 43
..... COT 51.9 18.5 29.6 27
..... CVM 53.1 14.1 32.8 64
..... Design 50.0 3.8 46.2 26
..... PAMS 33.0 18.0 49.0 100
..... Student Affairs 20.0 . 80.0 5
Back to Top

B7c: NC State change in next five years

  Change for
the better
(%)
Change for
the worse
(%)
Not really
change (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 39.6 12.6 47.8 913

B7c: NC State change in next five years Change for
the better
(%)
Change for
the worse
(%)
Not really
change (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 39.4 14.1 46.6 249
..... CALS
..... CED 63.6 9.1 27.3 44
..... CHASS 32.2 19.5 48.3 149
..... CNR 48.1 13.5 38.5 52
..... COE 38.3 6.7 55.0 149
..... COM 38.6 6.8 54.5 44
..... COT 51.9 11.1 37.0 27
..... CVM 40.0 4.6 55.4 65
..... Design 46.2 19.2 34.6 26
..... PAMS 34.7 14.9 50.5 101
..... Student Affairs 40.0 . 60.0 5
Back to top

Continue to Section C: Leadership



For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section B only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page