NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section C: Leadership

Tables of Results
by Academic Profile


The following tables provide results to questions in Section C: Leadership, broken down by administrative experience, rank, and tenure status. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between groups (e.g., between tenure-track and non-tenure-track) are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with Section C: Leadership results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section C by College | Section C by Demographic Profile


C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 35.8 37.2 17.3 9.7 1096

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 40.1 38.3 13.7 7.9 227
..... Assoc Prof 3.0 34.7 39.6 16.3 9.4 288
..... Full Prof 3.1 39.4 35.4 16.9 8.2 449
..... Lecturer 2.5 18.2 36.4 27.3 18.2 132

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 28.6 35.7 20.6 15.1 199
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 36.1 38.8 16.9 8.2 183
..... TT: Tenured 3.0 37.7 37.3 16.5 8.5 714

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.9 34.1 36.8 18.7 10.3 812
..... Yes (%) 3.1 40.5 38.4 13.4 7.7 284
Back to top


C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 38.8 33.3 16.9 11.0 1074

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.2 48.1 33.3 11.6 6.9 216
..... Assoc Prof 3.0 35.8 35.8 20.0 8.4 285
..... Full Prof 3.0 42.2 31.2 14.8 11.7 445
..... Lecturer 2.5 18.0 35.2 25.8 21.1 128

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 27.5 34.2 22.3 16.1 193
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.2 47.1 32.2 12.6 8.0 174
..... TT: Tenured 3.0 39.9 33.4 16.4 10.3 707

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 37.7 32.2 18.9 11.3 790
..... Yes (%) 3.1 41.9 36.6 11.3 10.2 284
Back to top


C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 32.9 36.9 18.5 11.8 1062

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 40.5 36.8 13.6 9.1 220
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 31.3 38.8 19.2 10.7 281
..... Full Prof 2.9 34.6 36.0 17.5 11.8 439
..... Lecturer 2.5 16.4 36.1 28.7 18.9 122

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 25.4 34.1 24.9 15.7 185
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 38.2 38.2 13.5 10.1 178
..... TT: Tenured 2.9 33.5 37.3 18.0 11.2 699

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.9 31.0 36.1 20.3 12.6 784
..... Yes (%) 3.1 38.1 39.2 13.3 9.4 278
Back to top


C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 29.3 44.5 19.4 6.9 1048

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 34.1 44.9 13.6 7.5 214
..... Assoc Prof 3.0 28.1 45.0 21.9 5.0 278
..... Full Prof 3.0 30.7 45.1 17.6 6.6 437
..... Lecturer 2.7 18.5 40.3 30.3 10.9 119

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 23.8 42.5 25.4 8.3 181
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 32.4 45.7 13.9 8.1 173
..... TT: Tenured 3.0 30.0 44.7 19.2 6.2 694

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.9 28.6 42.7 20.9 7.8 770
..... Yes (%) 3.1 31.3 49.3 15.1 4.3 278
Back to top


C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 46.8 36.6 10.4 6.2 1063

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.3 49.3 34.5 10.3 5.8 223
..... Assoc Prof 3.2 44.7 39.0 9.6 6.7 282
..... Full Prof 3.3 50.1 35.2 9.2 5.5 437
..... Lecturer 3.0 34.7 39.7 17.4 8.3 121

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.1 38.7 37.6 16.7 7.0 186
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.3 50.3 34.1 9.5 6.1 179
..... TT: Tenured 3.3 48.0 37.0 9.0 6.0 698

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.2 44.1 37.5 11.2 7.1 786
..... Yes (%) 3.4 54.2 33.9 8.3 3.6 277
Back to top


C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 21.0 38.3 29.0 11.7 1055

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 29.2 38.4 21.9 10.5 219
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 18.2 35.7 35.4 10.7 280
..... Full Prof 2.7 20.9 41.5 25.1 12.5 431
..... Lecturer 2.5 13.6 32.8 40.8 12.8 125

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.6 20.0 35.3 34.2 10.5 190
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 27.1 37.3 22.6 13.0 177
..... TT: Tenured 2.7 19.8 39.4 29.2 11.6 688

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 20.1 37.5 30.8 11.7 777
..... Yes (%) 2.8 23.7 40.6 24.1 11.5 278
Back to top


C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 36.3 34.0 16.7 12.9 1075

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 41.6 34.7 15.5 8.2 219
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 34.9 31.3 19.7 14.1 284
..... Full Prof 3.1 40.8 36.5 13.4 9.3 441
..... Lecturer 2.3 15.3 30.5 23.7 30.5 131

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.5 21.9 31.6 23.5 23.0 196
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.1 42.0 34.7 13.1 10.2 176
..... TT: Tenured 3.0 38.8 34.6 15.8 10.8 703

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.9 33.4 33.3 18.6 14.7 796
..... Yes (%) 3.2 44.4 36.2 11.5 7.9 279
Back to top


C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 22.2 36.8 22.8 18.2 962

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 31.3 34.4 18.8 15.6 192
..... Assoc Prof 2.5 20.1 35.4 23.6 20.9 254
..... Full Prof 2.7 23.6 40.3 22.1 13.9 402
..... Lecturer 2.1 7.0 31.6 29.8 31.6 114

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.4 16.0 32.0 26.6 25.4 169
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 27.9 34.4 17.5 20.1 154
..... TT: Tenured 2.7 22.5 38.7 23.0 15.8 639

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.6 21.9 34.3 24.1 19.6 693
..... Yes (%) 2.7 23.0 43.1 19.3 14.5 269
Back to top


C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 18.3 41.2 26.2 14.4 1086

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 23.6 41.3 24.4 10.7 225
..... Assoc Prof 2.6 19.6 38.8 26.9 14.7 286
..... Full Prof 2.6 15.5 41.8 26.5 16.2 445
..... Lecturer 2.6 16.2 43.8 26.2 13.8 130

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 18.8 41.6 25.9 13.7 197
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 22.7 41.4 25.4 10.5 181
..... TT: Tenured 2.6 17.1 41.0 26.4 15.5 708

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.6 19.0 38.8 27.2 14.9 804
..... Yes (%) 2.7 16.3 47.9 23.0 12.8 282
Back to top


C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 26.0 41.1 22.1 10.8 1028

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 27.5 41.2 21.3 10.0 211
..... Assoc Prof 2.8 27.1 36.4 24.9 11.5 269
..... Full Prof 2.9 28.4 44.4 19.4 7.8 423
..... Lecturer 2.4 12.8 40.0 26.4 20.8 125

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.6 19.6 40.8 23.4 16.3 184
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 24.7 40.6 21.8 12.9 170
..... TT: Tenured 2.9 28.0 41.4 21.8 8.8 674

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 23.7 40.0 24.3 12.0 752
..... Yes (%) 3.0 32.2 44.2 15.9 7.6 276
Back to top


C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 43.4 34.5 15.2 6.9 1006

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.3 48.7 34.7 11.6 5.0 199
..... Assoc Prof 3.2 42.8 36.4 14.4 6.4 264
..... Full Prof 3.2 47.3 31.4 15.0 6.4 421
..... Lecturer 2.7 23.0 41.0 23.8 12.3 122

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 32.4 37.4 20.3 9.9 182
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.2 45.4 35.6 12.3 6.7 163
..... TT: Tenured 3.2 46.0 33.4 14.5 6.1 661

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.1 40.8 35.5 16.6 7.1 737
..... Yes (%) 3.3 50.6 31.6 11.5 6.3 269
Back to top


C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.4 53.8 35.6 7.7 2.9 1010

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.5 57.7 32.6 8.4 1.4 215
..... Assoc Prof 3.4 51.1 37.9 6.8 4.2 264
..... Full Prof 3.5 58.2 33.6 5.4 2.9 411
..... Lecturer 3.2 37.5 43.3 16.7 2.5 120

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.3 44.4 39.4 13.9 2.2 180
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.4 54.9 34.9 8.0 2.3 175
..... TT: Tenured 3.4 56.0 34.8 6.0 3.2 655

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.3 49.5 38.1 9.3 3.1 745
..... Yes (%) 3.6 65.7 28.7 3.4 2.3 265
Back to top


C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 35.3 39.6 16.4 8.7 1057

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 37.8 45.2 10.1 6.9 217
..... Assoc Prof 3.0 33.5 41.5 18.5 6.5 275
..... Full Prof 3.1 40.2 35.6 16.0 8.2 438
..... Lecturer 2.6 18.1 40.2 23.6 18.1 127

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 24.9 41.3 19.6 14.3 189
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.1 35.8 44.3 11.9 8.0 176
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 38.0 38.0 16.6 7.4 692

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 31.5 41.3 18.1 9.0 777
..... Yes (%) 3.2 45.7 35.0 11.4 7.9 280
Back to top


C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 33.3 37.8 17.2 11.7 1033

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.0 35.8 40.9 15.3 7.9 215
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 33.8 35.0 19.9 11.3 266
..... Full Prof 3.0 37.6 37.4 16.2 8.7 425
..... Lecturer 2.4 13.4 39.4 18.1 29.1 127

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.6 21.5 40.3 16.7 21.5 186
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.0 33.0 40.3 17.0 9.7 176
..... TT: Tenured 3.0 36.7 36.4 17.4 9.5 671

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 30.1 37.0 19.6 13.4 762
..... Yes (%) 3.2 42.4 39.9 10.7 7.0 271
Back to top


C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.1 37.6 38.7 16.6 7.1 987

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 39.8 35.8 16.9 7.5 201
..... Assoc Prof 3.0 36.7 37.9 16.8 8.6 256
..... Full Prof 3.2 41.7 40.0 13.2 5.1 408
..... Lecturer 2.8 22.1 41.0 27.0 9.8 122

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 26.8 41.3 24.6 7.3 179
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.1 39.6 36.0 15.2 9.1 164
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 40.1 38.7 14.8 6.5 644

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept
A2: Ever held an administrative position* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 34.6 38.6 19.1 7.6 722
..... Yes (%) 3.2 45.7 38.9 9.8 5.7 265
Back to top


C2a: College admin communication with faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 10.1 43.1 33.6 13.2 974

C2a: College admin communication with faculty
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.7 18.1 41.5 33.2 7.3 193
..... Assoc Prof 2.4 7.5 38.7 39.9 13.8 253
..... Full Prof 2.4 7.3 44.8 31.5 16.5 413
..... Lecturer 2.6 12.2 49.6 27.8 10.4 115

C2a: College admin communication with faculty
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 13.9 49.1 28.3 8.7 173
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 17.3 40.4 33.3 9.0 156
..... TT: Tenured 2.4 7.3 42.2 35.0 15.5 645

C2a: College admin communication with faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.5 10.4 42.3 33.5 13.8 719
..... Yes (%) 2.5 9.0 45.5 33.7 11.8 255
Back to top


C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.3 9.2 34.1 34.5 22.2 901

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.5 16.1 37.4 28.7 17.8 174
..... Assoc Prof 2.2 6.0 33.0 36.5 24.5 233
..... Full Prof 2.2 7.1 30.4 37.8 24.7 392
..... Lecturer 2.6 12.7 45.1 27.5 14.7 102

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.6 12.4 47.1 27.5 13.1 153
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.5 15.6 34.8 29.1 20.6 141
..... TT: Tenured 2.2 6.9 30.6 37.6 24.9 607

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.3 9.8 32.9 34.5 22.9 656
..... Yes (%) 2.3 7.8 37.1 34.7 20.4 245
Back to top


C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.2 7.8 32.3 36.3 23.6 818

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.4 15.5 28.4 37.4 18.7 155
..... Assoc Prof 2.1 3.3 32.9 37.6 26.2 210
..... Full Prof 2.2 6.6 30.1 37.5 25.8 365
..... Lecturer 2.5 10.2 46.6 26.1 17.0 88

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.5 10.8 44.6 30.0 14.6 130
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.4 14.2 29.1 35.4 21.3 127
..... TT: Tenured 2.2 5.7 30.1 38.0 26.2 561

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.2 7.8 32.6 35.8 23.8 589
..... Yes (%) 2.2 7.9 31.4 37.6 23.1 229
Back to top


C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.8 20.6 47.7 20.3 11.4 896

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 24.3 45.1 17.9 12.7 173
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 13.9 53.2 22.9 10.0 231
..... Full Prof 2.8 23.2 45.8 18.9 12.1 397
..... Lecturer 2.8 20.0 46.3 24.2 9.5 95

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 21.2 46.6 24.0 8.2 146
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 24.3 45.0 15.7 15.0 140
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 19.7 48.5 20.5 11.3 610

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 19.2 48.3 19.8 12.6 650
..... Yes (%) 2.9 24.4 45.9 21.5 8.1 246
Back to top


C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 13.4 37.3 32.1 17.2 868

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.7 20.7 39.1 27.2 13.0 169
..... Assoc Prof 2.4 9.9 34.1 38.1 17.9 223
..... Full Prof 2.4 11.3 36.1 33.4 19.2 380
..... Lecturer 2.7 16.7 46.9 21.9 14.6 96

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 17.2 46.9 22.1 13.8 145
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.6 19.9 37.5 29.4 13.2 136
..... TT: Tenured 2.4 10.9 34.9 35.3 18.9 587

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.5 13.2 37.7 31.8 17.3 629
..... Yes (%) 2.5 13.8 36.4 33.1 16.7 239
Back to top


C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 16.4 37.4 27.0 19.2 885

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.7 19.3 42.9 24.2 13.7 161
..... Assoc Prof 2.3 11.0 32.0 34.6 22.4 228
..... Full Prof 2.6 19.3 38.6 24.7 17.5 389
..... Lecturer 2.4 13.1 36.4 23.4 27.1 107

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.4 13.1 38.8 26.9 21.3 160
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 20.5 40.9 22.0 16.5 127
..... TT: Tenured 2.5 16.4 36.3 28.1 19.2 598

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.5 15.0 36.6 27.5 20.8 639
..... Yes (%) 2.6 19.9 39.4 25.6 15.0 246
Back to top


C2g: College admin conflict resolution

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 8.9 38.6 31.9 20.6 640

C2g: College admin conflict resolution
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.6 17.3 38.2 27.3 17.3 110
..... Assoc Prof 2.1 1.9 36.1 36.1 25.8 155
..... Full Prof 2.4 9.9 37.1 33.3 19.7 294
..... Lecturer 2.5 7.4 49.4 24.7 18.5 81

C2g: College admin conflict resolution
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.5 10.5 45.6 26.3 17.5 114
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.5 15.7 37.1 27.0 20.2 89
..... TT: Tenured 2.3 7.1 37.1 34.3 21.5 437

C2g: College admin conflict resolution
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.4 9.0 39.1 30.2 21.7 443
..... Yes (%) 2.4 8.6 37.6 35.5 18.3 197
Back to top


C2h: College admin provide necessary resources

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.3 9.1 36.2 32.1 22.7 1004

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.5 14.6 38.0 30.2 17.1 205
..... Assoc Prof 2.3 7.4 36.6 32.7 23.3 257
..... Full Prof 2.2 7.8 33.3 32.8 26.1 421
..... Lecturer 2.4 7.4 42.1 31.4 19.0 121

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.4 8.9 41.7 29.4 20.0 180
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.5 14.5 38.6 31.3 15.7 166
..... TT: Tenured 2.2 7.8 34.0 33.0 25.2 658

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.3 9.7 36.2 30.7 23.4 743
..... Yes (%) 2.3 7.3 36.0 36.0 20.7 261
Back to top


C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.3 8.2 38.2 31.3 22.3 840

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.5 14.5 39.2 26.5 19.9 166
..... Assoc Prof 2.2 5.7 34.9 35.9 23.4 209
..... Full Prof 2.3 8.2 37.9 31.9 22.0 364
..... Lecturer 2.3 3.0 44.6 27.7 24.8 101

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.3 6.0 46.0 24.0 24.0 150
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.4 13.7 35.9 29.8 20.6 131
..... TT: Tenured 2.3 7.5 36.7 33.6 22.2 559

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.3 8.3 37.0 31.4 23.4 606
..... Yes (%) 2.4 8.1 41.5 31.2 19.2 234
Back to top


C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 29.3 43.0 18.0 9.8 779

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 27.9 42.2 19.5 10.4 154
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 28.5 44.6 16.1 10.9 193
..... Full Prof 2.9 30.4 42.2 18.6 8.8 339
..... Lecturer 2.9 29.0 44.1 17.2 9.7 93

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 30.7 42.1 16.4 10.7 140
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 26.2 43.4 19.7 10.7 122
..... TT: Tenured 2.9 29.6 43.1 18.0 9.3 517

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.9 28.9 43.2 17.2 10.8 558
..... Yes (%) 3.0 30.3 42.5 19.9 7.2 221
Back to top


C2k: College admin support academic freedom

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.2 34.7 50.2 11.0 4.2 867

C2k: College admin support academic freedom
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.2 35.8 49.1 12.1 2.9 173
..... Assoc Prof 3.1 29.7 52.7 13.1 4.5 222
..... Full Prof 3.2 38.1 47.8 8.6 5.4 370
..... Lecturer 3.2 31.4 54.9 12.7 1.0 102

C2k: College admin support academic freedom
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.2 32.7 52.9 12.4 2.0 153
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.2 34.5 51.1 11.5 2.9 139
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 35.3 49.2 10.4 5.0 575

C2k: College admin support academic freedom
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.1 32.9 51.4 11.6 4.1 636
..... Yes (%) 3.2 39.8 46.8 9.1 4.3 231
Back to top


C2l: College admin make rational decisions

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.7 16.0 49.3 25.0 9.7 852

C2l: College admin make rational decisions
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.8 21.4 46.5 22.0 10.1 159
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 11.6 49.5 32.4 6.5 216
..... Full Prof 2.7 16.3 50.0 22.1 11.6 380
..... Lecturer 2.7 15.5 50.5 24.7 9.3 97

C2l: College admin make rational decisions
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 17.5 49.0 23.1 10.5 143
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.8 21.7 47.3 21.7 9.3 129
..... TT: Tenured 2.7 14.3 49.8 26.2 9.7 580

C2l: College admin make rational decisions
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.7 15.6 49.2 25.4 9.8 614
..... Yes (%) 2.7 16.8 49.6 23.9 9.7 238
Back to top


C2m: College admin make equitable decisions

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 13.5 43.1 28.7 14.7 805

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.7 17.8 43.2 26.0 13.0 146
..... Assoc Prof 2.4 10.3 36.9 35.0 17.7 203
..... Full Prof 2.6 14.6 46.0 26.4 12.9 363
..... Lecturer 2.5 9.7 45.2 28.0 17.2 93

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.5 11.6 45.7 26.1 16.7 138
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.6 18.3 41.7 26.1 13.9 115
..... TT: Tenured 2.5 13.0 42.8 29.9 14.3 552

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.5 13.2 42.5 28.9 15.4 577
..... Yes (%) 2.6 14.5 44.7 28.1 12.7 228
Back to top


C2n: College admin promote diversity within college

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 32.7 44.2 14.9 8.1 852

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college
RankMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 26.5 48.8 16.7 8.0 162
..... Assoc Prof 2.9 29.3 42.3 19.2 9.1 208
..... Full Prof 3.1 37.8 42.6 11.9 7.7 378
..... Lecturer 3.0 30.8 47.1 14.4 7.7 104

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.0 27.0 50.0 15.1 7.9 152
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 28.5 45.4 16.9 9.2 130
..... TT: Tenured 3.1 35.3 42.5 14.4 7.9 570

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 32.8 43.2 15.0 9.0 613
..... Yes (%) 3.1 32.6 46.9 14.6 5.9 239
Back to top


C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.2 4.4 34.3 39.6 21.6 970

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.4 6.7 41.3 38.0 14.0 179
..... Assoc Prof 2.1 3.1 30.0 37.0 30.0 257
..... Full Prof 2.2 4.8 32.6 42.9 19.8 420
..... Lecturer 2.2 2.6 39.5 36.0 21.9 114

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.3 4.2 39.5 37.1 19.2 167
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.4 6.3 39.9 37.8 16.1 143
..... TT: Tenured 2.2 4.1 31.8 40.6 23.5 660

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.2 4.9 34.8 38.8 21.5 701
..... Yes (%) 2.2 3.3 33.1 41.6 21.9 269
Back to top


C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.1 4.2 27.3 40.2 28.3 696

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.3 10.3 29.3 44.0 16.4 116
..... Assoc Prof 1.8 2.3 18.6 40.7 38.4 172
..... Full Prof 2.1 3.4 28.9 39.7 28.0 325
..... Lecturer 2.2 2.4 36.1 36.1 25.3 83

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.2 4.5 34.2 36.0 25.2 111
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.3 10.4 29.2 43.8 16.7 96
..... TT: Tenured 2.0 2.9 25.4 40.5 31.3 489

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.1 5.5 28.3 38.8 27.5 477
..... Yes (%) 2.0 1.4 25.1 43.4 30.1 219
Back to top


C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.5 7.3 46.5 30.6 15.6 879

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.6 13.0 48.1 27.8 11.1 162
..... Assoc Prof 2.3 3.5 42.1 33.8 20.6 228
..... Full Prof 2.4 7.0 44.4 32.7 15.8 385
..... Lecturer 2.7 7.7 61.5 20.2 10.6 104

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.7 8.2 59.6 21.2 11.0 146
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.6 13.1 45.4 30.0 11.5 130
..... TT: Tenured 2.4 5.8 43.6 33.0 17.6 603

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.5 8.4 47.0 29.6 15.0 621
..... Yes (%) 2.4 4.7 45.3 32.9 17.1 258
Back to top


C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 23.0 48.8 18.5 9.7 761

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 29.5 41.7 23.0 5.8 139
..... Assoc Prof 2.7 15.4 51.1 18.1 15.4 188
..... Full Prof 2.9 25.2 47.9 18.3 8.6 349
..... Lecturer 2.9 20.0 58.8 12.9 8.2 85

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 21.6 56.0 14.4 8.0 125
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 28.2 41.8 24.5 5.5 110
..... TT: Tenured 2.8 22.2 48.5 18.3 11.0 526

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.8 22.1 49.9 17.5 10.5 543
..... Yes (%) 2.9 25.2 45.9 21.1 7.8 218
Back to top


C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 3.0 27.1 52.4 15.2 5.3 886

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 3.1 31.3 48.8 16.9 3.0 166
..... Assoc Prof 2.8 21.4 47.6 20.5 10.5 229
..... Full Prof 3.1 30.6 52.8 12.1 4.5 379
..... Lecturer 3.1 20.5 66.1 12.5 0.9 112

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 3.1 23.1 62.5 12.5 1.9 160
..... TT: Non-Tenured 3.1 29.8 49.6 17.6 3.1 131
..... TT: Tenured 3.0 27.6 50.3 15.5 6.7 595

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 3.0 25.6 52.5 15.9 5.9 640
..... Yes (%) 3.1 30.9 52.0 13.4 3.7 246
Back to top


C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.6 10.5 50.9 27.3 11.3 788

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.7 13.7 55.4 23.0 7.9 139
..... Assoc Prof 2.4 6.8 43.7 34.5 15.0 206
..... Full Prof 2.6 11.5 50.1 26.5 11.8 355
..... Lecturer 2.8 10.2 63.6 20.5 5.7 88

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.8 11.0 63.0 18.9 7.1 127
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.7 13.9 51.9 26.9 7.4 108
..... TT: Tenured 2.5 9.8 47.9 29.3 13.0 553

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.6 11.2 51.4 25.9 11.4 552
..... Yes (%) 2.6 8.9 49.6 30.5 11.0 236
Back to top


C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.4 9.5 43.0 26.5 21.0 739

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.6 14.1 47.4 21.5 17.0 135
..... Assoc Prof 2.2 6.5 35.1 31.9 26.5 185
..... Full Prof 2.5 10.0 43.5 28.4 18.1 331
..... Lecturer 2.4 6.8 51.1 15.9 26.1 88

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions
Tenure Track Status* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.4 7.2 51.2 18.4 23.2 125
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.6 15.1 46.2 20.8 17.9 106
..... TT: Tenured 2.4 8.9 40.4 29.7 21.1 508

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.4 10.6 42.6 25.2 21.6 519
..... Yes (%) 2.4 6.8 44.1 29.5 19.5 220
Back to top


C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university

  Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
Total(N) 2.9 25.2 49.0 17.9 7.9 858

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university
Rank* Mean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Assist Prof/Instructor 2.9 23.6 50.3 16.6 9.6 157
..... Assoc Prof 2.8 22.4 44.3 20.1 13.2 219
..... Full Prof 3.0 28.7 48.5 18.8 4.0 373
..... Lecturer 2.9 21.1 57.8 12.8 8.3 109

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university
Tenure Track StatusMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... Not Tenure Track 2.9 21.4 57.1 13.0 8.4 154
..... TT: Non-Tenured 2.9 23.2 50.4 16.8 9.6 125
..... TT: Tenured 2.9 26.6 46.5 19.5 7.4 579

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university
A2: Ever held an administrative positionMean Rating 4: Excellent (%)
3: Good (%)

2: Fair (%)

1: Poor (%)

Total(N)
..... No (%) 2.9 25.5 48.6 16.9 9.0 609
..... Yes (%) 2.9 24.5 49.8 20.5 5.2 249
Back to top

Continue to Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships


View These Results by College

View These Results by Demographic Profile

To download an MS Word document with Section C: Leadership results by college, academic profile, and demographic profile, click here.


For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2007

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page