North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Design
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	80.0	60.0	27.3	16.7
..... Yes (%)	20.0	40.0	72.7	83.3
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0	3.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	40.0	18.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	60.0	40.0	81.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	.	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	20.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.2	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	20.0	18.2	.
3: Agree (%)	.	20.0	54.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	20.0	27.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	40.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	20.0	18.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	20.0	72.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	20.0	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	40.0	.	20.0
Total (N)	5	5	11	5

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0	4.1	4.2
5: Very strong (%)	20.0	25.0	18.2	40.0
4: Strong (%)	40.0	50.0	72.7	40.0
3: Average (%)	20.0	25.0	9.1	20.0
2: Weak (%)	20.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	5	4	11	5

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.8	4.0	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	.	25.0	40.0	25.0
4: Strong (%)	50.0	25.0	30.0	25.0
3: Average (%)	25.0	50.0	20.0	25.0
2: Weak (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1: Very weak (%)	25.0	.	.	25.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	4

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.5	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	.	.	.	16.7
4: Strong (%)	20.0	50.0	54.5	16.7
3: Average (%)	80.0	25.0	45.5	33.3
2: Weak (%)	.	.	.	16.7
1: Very weak (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	5	4	11	6

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	2.3	4.0	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	25.0	.	27.3	16.7
4: Strong (%)	25.0	.	45.5	33.3
3: Average (%)	50.0	50.0	27.3	50.0
2: Weak (%)	.	25.0	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.4	3.0
4: Strong (%)	25.0	25.0	36.4	40.0
3: Average (%)	50.0	25.0	63.6	40.0
2: Weak (%)	25.0	50.0	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	4	4	11	5

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	.	.	9.1	16.7
4: Strong (%)	40.0	25.0	27.3	33.3
3: Average (%)	60.0	50.0	54.5	33.3
2: Weak (%)	.	25.0	9.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	5	4	11	6

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	3.1	2.6
5: Very strong (%)	.	.	10.0	.
4: Strong (%)	.	25.0	10.0	20.0
3: Average (%)	50.0	.	60.0	40.0
2: Weak (%)	50.0	25.0	20.0	20.0
1: Very weak (%)	.	50.0	.	20.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.6	4.4	4.4	4.8
A (%)	60.0	40.0	45.5	80.0
B (%)	40.0	60.0	45.5	20.0
C (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	5	5	11	5

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.2	4.1	4.3
A (%)	20.0	.	36.4	50.0
B (%)	60.0	40.0	36.4	33.3
C (%)	20.0	40.0	27.3	16.7
D (%)	.	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	4.4	4.5	4.5
A (%)	20.0	40.0	63.6	50.0
B (%)	60.0	60.0	27.3	50.0
C (%)	20.0	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0	4.4	4.3
A (%)	20.0	40.0	45.5	33.3
B (%)	60.0	20.0	45.5	66.7
C (%)	.	40.0	9.1	.
D (%)	20.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.8	4.4	4.7	4.3
A (%)	80.0	40.0	72.7	33.3
B (%)	20.0	60.0	27.3	66.7
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.6	4.2	4.5	4.5
A (%)	60.0	20.0	54.5	50.0
B (%)	40.0	80.0	45.5	50.0
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	.	60.0	36.4	66.7
Vision with slow progress (%)	60.0	.	45.5	16.7
No clear vision (%)	40.0	40.0	18.2	16.7
Total (N)	5	5	11	6

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	4.0	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	100.0	44.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.	55.6	50.0
Total (N)	3	3	9	4

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	60.0	25.0	63.6	33.3
Vision with slow progress (%)	40.0	50.0	36.4	33.3
No clear vision (%)	.	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	5	4	11	6

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	80.0	50.0	81.8	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	20.0	.	9.1	16.7
Not really change (%)	.	50.0	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	5	4	11	6

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	80.0	25.0	45.5	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Not really change (%)	20.0	75.0	45.5	50.0
Total (N)	5	4	11	6

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	60.0	50.0	45.5	33.3
Change for the worse (%)	.	.	18.2	50.0
Not really change (%)	40.0	50.0	36.4	16.7
Total (N)	5	4	11	6

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.2	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	25.0	45.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	50.0	25.0	27.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	50.0	27.3	16.7
1: Poor (%)	25.0	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	25.0	36.4	33.3
3: Good (%)	25.0	25.0	54.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	50.0	.	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	50.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.1	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	50.0	25.0	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	25.0	50.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	.	25.0	11.1	16.7
3: Good (%)	50.0	.	77.8	33.3
2: Fair (%)	50.0	50.0	.	50.0
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	11.1	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	3.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	50.0	60.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	33.3	.	40.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	50.0	.	33.3
1: Poor (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.3	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	25.0	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.0	60.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	66.7	50.0	10.0	50.0
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	3.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	50.0	45.5	33.3
3: Good (%)	.	.	27.3	16.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0	18.2	.
1: Poor (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	50.0
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	20.0	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.0	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	66.7	50.0	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.6	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	25.0	.	.
3: Good (%)	.	25.0	60.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0	40.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	33.3	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.0	2.8	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	.	50.0	20.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	33.3	.	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	33.3	50.0	40.0	16.7
1: Poor (%)	33.3	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	3.5	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	33.3	72.7	33.3
3: Good (%)	33.3	33.3	18.2	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	33.3	.	.
1: Poor (%)	33.3	.	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	3	3	11	6

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.5	3.7	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	25.0	80.0	40.0
3: Good (%)	66.7	25.0	10.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	.	25.0	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	5

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	3.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	50.0	54.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	.	.	27.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	18.2	.
1: Poor (%)	66.7	50.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	3.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	50.0	50.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	.	.	30.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0	10.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	33.3	25.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.7	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	50.0	80.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	.	10.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	3.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	.	25.0	27.3	.
3: Good (%)	66.7	25.0	54.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	50.0	18.2	33.3
1: Poor (%)	33.3	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.9	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	.
3: Good (%)	.	.	72.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0	18.2	16.7
1: Poor (%)	33.3	50.0	.	50.0
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	.	54.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	25.0	36.4	33.3
1: Poor (%)	33.3	50.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	25.0	36.4	16.7
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.0	63.6	16.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	50.0	.	66.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	25.0	45.5	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.0	45.5	66.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	16.7
1: Poor (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.8	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	25.0	27.3	.
3: Good (%)	66.7	.	36.4	40.0
2: Fair (%)	.	50.0	27.3	20.0
1: Poor (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	40.0
Total (N)	3	4	11	5

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8	3.3	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	36.4	.
3: Good (%)	66.7	25.0	54.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	25.0	9.1	50.0
1: Poor (%)	33.3	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.8	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Good (%)	.	25.0	81.8	60.0
2: Fair (%)	66.7	50.0	18.2	40.0
1: Poor (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	5

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.9	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	.	25.0	9.1	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	.	72.7	20.0
2: Fair (%)	66.7	50.0	18.2	40.0
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	40.0
Total (N)	3	4	11	5

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.5	3.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	100.0	50.0	90.9	50.0
3: Good (%)	.	50.0	9.1	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	2.5	3.7	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	25.0	81.8	33.3
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	25.0	9.1	16.7
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	3.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	.	63.6	.
3: Good (%)	.	25.0	36.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	75.0	.	50.0
1: Poor (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	3.3	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	25.0	45.5	.
3: Good (%)	.	25.0	36.4	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	25.0	18.2	33.3
1: Poor (%)	33.3	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	2.8	3.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	50.0	54.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	33.3	.	18.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	25.0	27.3	16.7
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	3.0	2.5	2.0
3: Good (%)	.	100.0	63.6	20.0
2: Fair (%)	50.0	.	27.3	60.0
1: Poor (%)	50.0	.	9.1	20.0
Total (N)	2	2	11	5

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	3.0	2.4	2.0
3: Good (%)	.	100.0	42.9	25.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	57.1	50.0
1: Poor (%)	100.0	.	.	25.0
Total (N)	1	1	7	4

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	2.5
3: Good (%)	100.0	100.0	90.9	75.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	.	25.0
Total (N)	2	3	11	4

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.1	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	33.3	37.5	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	66.7	37.5	75.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	25.0	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	.	25.0
Total (N)	2	3	8	4

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	3.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	.	50.0	27.3	20.0
3: Good (%)	100.0	50.0	54.5	60.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	9.1	20.0
Total (N)	2	2	11	5

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	33.3	10.0	40.0
3: Good (%)	100.0	33.3	70.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	.	33.3	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	1	3	10	5

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.3	2.6	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	.	33.3	.	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	66.7	60.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	.	.	40.0	.
1: Poor (%)	50.0	.	.	40.0
Total (N)	2	3	10	5

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	.	33.3	27.3	20.0
3: Good (%)	100.0	33.3	27.3	40.0
2: Fair (%)	.	33.3	45.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	2	3	11	5

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	50.0	72.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	27.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0	63.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	25.0	36.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.5	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0	45.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	.	54.5	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	2.6	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	18.2	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	50.0	36.4	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.	36.4	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	50.0	9.1	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.6	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	22.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.	44.4	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	50.0	11.1	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.8	3.5	3.8
4: Very familiar (%)	25.0	75.0	54.5	83.3
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	25.0	25.0	36.4	16.7
2: Not very familiar (%)	25.0	.	9.1	.
1: Not at all familiar (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.0	2.3	2.0
4: Very well (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Fairly well (%)	.	50.0	36.4	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	100.0	25.0	54.5	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.3	2.5	2.3
4: Very well (%)	.	50.0	9.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	.	25.0	45.5	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	100.0	25.0	36.4	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	9.1	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8	3.0	2.3
4: Very well (%)	.	25.0	36.4	.
3: Fairly well (%)	.	25.0	36.4	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	100.0	50.0	18.2	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	9.1	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.0	2.7
4: Very well (%)	.	50.0	45.5	33.3
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	.	18.2	16.7
2: Not very well (%)	50.0	25.0	27.3	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	25.0	9.1	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	18.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	25.0	.	45.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	75.0	25.0	27.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0	27.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.	54.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	18.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	3.1	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	50.0	36.4	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	.	45.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	25.0	9.1	16.7
1: Poor (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.0	2.9	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	25.0	18.2	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.0	63.6	16.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	66.7
1: Poor (%)	33.3	.	9.1	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5	2.6	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	.	50.0	22.2	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	50.0	22.2	33.3
2: Fair (%)	50.0	.	44.4	50.0
1: Poor (%)	.	.	11.1	16.7
Total (N)	2	2	9	6

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.3	2.3
3: Good (%)	100.0	100.0	42.9	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	.	42.9	66.7
1: Poor (%)	.	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	1	2	7	6

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.7	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	10.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	.	33.3	70.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	66.7	10.0	.
Total (N)	2	3	10	5

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.7	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	22.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	.	33.3	44.4	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	.	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	66.7	.	.
Total (N)	1	3	9	5

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.0	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	12.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	.	.	37.5	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	.	37.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	100.0	12.5	25.0
Total (N)	1	2	8	4

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	1.0	3.2	2.8
4: Very effective (%)	.	.	33.3	20.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	.	.	50.0	40.0
2: Not very effective (%)	50.0	.	16.7	40.0
1: Not at all effective (%)	50.0	100.0	.	.
Total (N)	2	1	6	5

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8	3.3	3.7
4: Very important (%)	50.0	75.0	36.4	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	50.0	25.0	54.5	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	50.0	100.0	72.7	83.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	50.0	.	18.2	16.7
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.8	4.0	3.6
4: Very important (%)	.	75.0	100.0	60.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	100.0	25.0	.	40.0
Total (N)	4	4	11	5

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	10.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.	30.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	50.0	60.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	54.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	27.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	54.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	75.0	25.0	27.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	30.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	50.0	50.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.0	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	45.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	45.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	.	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	60.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	100.0	50.0	20.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	44.4	16.7
3: Agree (%)	66.7	25.0	33.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	22.2	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	9	6

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	50.0	81.8	66.7
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	18.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	50.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	50.0	70.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	30.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	4

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5	3.7	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	50.0	72.7	83.3
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	27.3	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.3	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	33.3	71.4	.
3: Agree (%)	.	66.7	28.6	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	3	7	1

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5	3.7	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	50.0	72.7	80.0
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	27.3	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	5

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	3.7	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	50.0	81.8	83.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	25.0	9.1	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	50.0	80.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	50.0	10.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	2

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.5	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	50.0	77.8	80.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	22.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	9	5

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	50.0	81.8	83.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	18.2	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	33.3	80.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	33.3	66.7	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	3	3	10	3

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	50.0	81.8	83.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	18.2	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	33.3	75.0	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	66.7	25.0	100.0
Total (N)	3	3	8	1

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	50.0	81.8	80.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	18.2	20.0
Total (N)	3	4	11	5

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	50.0	81.8	83.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	18.2	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.8	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	50.0	80.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	3	4	10	2

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	33.3	80.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	66.7	20.0	25.0
Total (N)	3	3	10	4

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.0	3.7	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	.	81.8	33.3
3: Some (%)	66.7	25.0	9.1	33.3
2: A little (%)	.	50.0	9.1	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	11	6

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.5	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	.	25.0	54.5	40.0
3: Some (%)	100.0	50.0	36.4	60.0
2: A little (%)	.	25.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	4	4	11	5

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.8	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	75.0	81.8	16.7
3: Some (%)	50.0	.	18.2	16.7
2: A little (%)	.	25.0	.	50.0
1: None (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.3	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	50.0	54.5	33.3
3: Some (%)	75.0	25.0	18.2	33.3
2: A little (%)	.	25.0	27.3	16.7
1: None (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	1.5	1.7	1.8
3: Some (%)	25.0	.	27.3	33.3
2: A little (%)	.	50.0	18.2	16.7
1: None (%)	75.0	50.0	54.5	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.8	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	.	25.0	18.2	.
3: Some (%)	75.0	.	54.5	50.0
2: A little (%)	.	25.0	18.2	16.7
1: None (%)	25.0	50.0	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.2	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	.	.	18.2	.
3: Some (%)	25.0	25.0	18.2	50.0
2: A little (%)	75.0	50.0	27.3	.
1: None (%)	.	25.0	36.4	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	11	6

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.5	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	.	25.0	36.4	40.0
3: Some (%)	50.0	25.0	9.1	40.0
2: A little (%)	25.0	25.0	18.2	.
1: None (%)	25.0	25.0	36.4	20.0
Total (N)	4	4	11	5

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	30.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	75.0	.	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	30.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.0	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	50.0	80.0	83.3
3: Agree (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	25.0	60.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	25.0	75.0	40.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	40.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	75.0	25.0	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	50.0	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	.	25.0	30.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	50.0	50.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	5

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	.	22.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	100.0	33.3	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	66.7	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	3	2	9	5

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0	40.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	25.0	25.0	40.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	3.0	3.0
Frequently (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	50.0	25.0	70.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	.	25.0	.	33.3
Never (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	3.4	3.2
Frequently (%)	.	.	50.0	50.0
Sometimes (%)	50.0	50.0	40.0	16.7
Seldom (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	33.3
Never (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.7	3.2
Frequently (%)	25.0	50.0	70.0	16.7
Sometimes (%)	75.0	.	30.0	83.3
Seldom (%)	.	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	3.5	3.3
Frequently (%)	25.0	50.0	70.0	50.0
Sometimes (%)	.	.	20.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	75.0	50.0	.	16.7
Never (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	1.3	2.5	2.0
Frequently (%)	25.0	.	.	16.7
Sometimes (%)	25.0	.	60.0	.
Seldom (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	50.0
Never (%)	25.0	75.0	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.4	3.3
Frequently (%)	25.0	50.0	50.0	66.7
Sometimes (%)	75.0	25.0	40.0	16.7
Seldom (%)	.	25.0	10.0	.
Never (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.7	2.5
Frequently (%)	50.0	25.0	10.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	25.0	25.0	60.0	16.7
Seldom (%)	.	25.0	20.0	16.7
Never (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.5	2.6	2.7
Frequently (%)	25.0	.	.	16.7
Sometimes (%)	.	50.0	60.0	50.0
Seldom (%)	.	50.0	40.0	16.7
Never (%)	75.0	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	2.5	1.8
Frequently (%)	75.0	75.0	30.0	.
Sometimes (%)	.	.	10.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	.	.	40.0	16.7
Never (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.6	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	60.0	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	75.0	40.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	3.3	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	60.0	80.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	20.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	10.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8	3.4	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	75.0	25.0	50.0	80.0
3: Satisfied (%)	.	50.0	40.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	10.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	4.0	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0	100.0	80.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	.	20.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	2.8	3.6	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	75.0	25.0	60.0	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	40.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.7	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	70.0	80.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8	3.3	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	40.0	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	50.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	1.3	2.7	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	66.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	75.0	22.2	66.7
Total (N)	4	4	9	3

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.3	2.9	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	12.5	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	8	4

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	50.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	25.0	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	25.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	60.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	50.0	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	2	4	10	6

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	50.0	60.0
3: Agree (%)	100.0	25.0	50.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	5

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	.	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	50.0	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	50.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	25.0	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	.	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	6

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.6	1.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	70.0	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	50.0	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	10.0	50.0
Total (N)	2	4	10	6

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	22.2	40.0
3: Agree (%)	100.0	.	66.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	11.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	9	5

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	25.0	80.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	20.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	5

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.5	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	50.0	30.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	66.7	.	60.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	.	40.0
Total (N)	3	4	10	5

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	88.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	.	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	25.0
Total (N)	2	4	9	4

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8	1.9	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	22.2	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	44.4	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	50.0	33.3	40.0
Total (N)	3	4	9	5

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.4	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	60.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0	20.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	20.0	25.0
Total (N)	2	4	10	4

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	2.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	28.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	28.6	.
Total (N)	2	4	7	3

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.0	2.6	1.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	55.6	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	11.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	22.2	60.0
Total (N)	4	4	9	5

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.8	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	40.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	66.7	66.7	40.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	3	3	10	6

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	2.4	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	33.3	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	50.0	44.4	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	11.1	50.0
Total (N)	3	4	9	6

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3	11.1	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	66.7	66.7	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	1	3	9	5

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.7	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	50.0	70.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	30.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	3	4	10	5

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	4.0	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	100.0	33.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	.	.	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	66.7	50.0	11.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	88.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	9	6

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	66.7	62.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	.	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	3	3	8	5

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	50.0	25.0	10.0	.
No (%)	50.0	50.0	90.0	100.0
Don't know (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0	4.0
4: Very helpful (%)	50.0	100.0	100.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	2	1	1

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	2.3	2.6	1.5
3: Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	60.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	75.0	40.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	100.0	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	2	4	5	2

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	2.8	2.8	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	.	75.0	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	2	4	4	2

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	2.7	2.5	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	.	66.7	50.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	50.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	100.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	1	3	4	2

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	2.7	2.7	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	.	66.7	66.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	33.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	100.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	1	3	3	2

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.0	2.0	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	.	100.0	16.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	100.0	.	66.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	1	3	6	2

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	1.8	1.5
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	100.0	.	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	80.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	1	3	5	2

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.0	1.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	100.0	20.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	60.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	100.0
Total (N)	2	3	5	1

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	33.3	30.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	.	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	33.3	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	4	3	10	6

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	33.3	40.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	.	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	33.3	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	4	3	10	6

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0	40.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	50.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	10.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	2.7	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	33.3	40.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3	40.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	10.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	10.0	20.0
Total (N)	3	3	10	5

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	3.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	44.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	25.0	44.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	11.1	20.0
Total (N)	3	4	9	5

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	3.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	22.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	25.0	66.7	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	11.1	20.0
Total (N)	3	4	9	5

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	3.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	50.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	50.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	.	40.0
Total (N)	3	4	8	5

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8	2.7	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	22.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	.	33.3	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	75.0	11.1	40.0
Total (N)	3	4	9	5

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	3.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	44.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	33.3	33.3	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	22.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	40.0
Total (N)	3	3	9	5

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	3.1	3.0
4: Very well (%)	25.0	75.0	30.0	33.3
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	.	50.0	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	25.0	40.0	16.7
Yes (%)	75.0	75.0	60.0	83.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	50.0	30.0	.
Yes (%)	.	50.0	70.0	100.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	50.0	20.0	16.7
Yes (%)	.	50.0	80.0	83.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.4	3.5
4: Very well (%)	.	50.0	50.0	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	100.0	.	40.0	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	.	50.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	3.4	3.3
4: Very well (%)	.	50.0	60.0	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	75.0	.	20.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	.	50.0	20.0	16.7
1: Not at all (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	66.7	37.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	12.5	20.0
Total (N)	2	3	8	5

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.3	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	100.0	66.7	22.2	40.0
3: Agree (%)	.	.	55.6	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	22.2	20.0
Total (N)	1	3	9	5

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	25.0	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	50.0	20.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	2.8	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	.	25.0	66.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	11.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	100.0	.	11.1	16.7
Total (N)	1	4	9	6

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.3	1.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	44.4	.
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	75.0	44.4	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	60.0
Total (N)	2	4	9	5

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3	50.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	33.3	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	20.0
Total (N)	3	3	10	5

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	22.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	33.3	44.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	22.2	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	3	3	9	5

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	2.6	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	100.0	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	.	25.0	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	12.5	25.0
Total (N)	3	2	8	4

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	20.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	66.7	33.3	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	30.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	3	10	6

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	10.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	33.3	80.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	3	3	10	5

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	30.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	100.0	33.3	60.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	3	10	6

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.	80.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	33.3	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	25.0
Total (N)	3	3	10	4

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	20.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	25.0	60.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	4	10	4

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.	80.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	10.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	25.0
Total (N)	3	4	10	4

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	.	75.0	70.0	100.0
No experience (%)	100.0	25.0	30.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	75.0	40.0	16.7
Yes (%)	.	25.0	60.0	83.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	50.0	60.0	.
Yes (%)	.	50.0	40.0	100.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	50.0	90.0	83.3
Yes (%)	.	50.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	100.0	90.0	83.3
Yes (%)	.	.	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	66.7	12.5	16.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.	37.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.	37.5	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	12.5	.
Total (N)	2	3	8	6

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.3	2.7
3: Agree (%)	33.3	25.0	44.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	50.0	44.4	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	11.1	.
Total (N)	3	4	9	6

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	2.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	11.1	16.7
3: Agree (%)	.	33.3	22.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	33.3	55.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	1	3	9	6

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	12.5	16.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3	25.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	33.3	50.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	12.5	.
Total (N)	2	3	8	6

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	12.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	.	.	37.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	33.3	37.5	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	12.5	.
Total (N)	1	3	8	5

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	14.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	.	.	57.1	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	.	14.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0	14.3	.
Total (N)	1	2	7	5

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	66.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	66.7	.	.
Total (N)	3	6	4

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.7	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	16.7	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	.	.	16.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	100.0	66.7	66.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	.	16.7
Total (N)	1	3	6	6

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	3.0	3.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	37.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	25.0	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	3	4	8	5

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	37.5	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	25.0	37.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	2	4	8	5

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.3	2.3	2.0	1.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	.	.	12.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	50.0	75.0	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	75.0	25.0	12.5	40.0
Total (N)	4	4	8	5

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	100.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	4	3	5

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	3.0	3.5	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	.	25.0	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	100.0	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	3	4	2	6

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	3.0	2.7
4: Very well (%)	.	50.0	30.0	33.3
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	.	40.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	25.0	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	37.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	100.0	50.0	62.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	2	4	8	6

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.8	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	75.0	40.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	75.0	25.0	60.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.3	3.0	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	14.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	57.1	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	66.7	.	14.3	20.0
Total (N)	3	4	7	5

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.3	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	75.0	75.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	3	4	4	5

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	100.0	50.0	100.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	2	2	3	5

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.3	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	75.0	44.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.	55.6	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.7	2.7
3: Agree (%)	25.0	25.0	66.7	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	75.0	50.0	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.6	2.8
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	66.7	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	50.0	22.2	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	50.0	100.0	66.7	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	50.0	.	22.2	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0	3.8	3.7
4: Very important (%)	75.0	100.0	77.8	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.0	.	22.2	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0	3.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	75.0	100.0	66.7	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	.	.	33.3	16.7
2: Not very important (%)	25.0	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8	3.8	3.7
4: Very important (%)	75.0	75.0	77.8	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	.	25.0	22.2	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0	3.8	3.3
4: Very important (%)	100.0	100.0	77.8	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	.	.	22.2	16.7
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0	3.6	3.3
4: Very important (%)	75.0	100.0	66.7	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.0	.	22.2	16.7
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	11.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	25.0	50.0	60.0	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	50.0	25.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	60.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	50.0	30.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.1	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	40.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	30.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	2.7	2.8	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	.	33.3	50.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	100.0	33.3	.	33.3
Total (N)	1	3	6	3

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0	50.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	40.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	2.3	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	.	66.7	44.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	44.4	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	50.0	33.3	.	25.0
Total (N)	2	3	9	4

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	25.0	60.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	20.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.8	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	40.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0	40.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	30.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	25.0	40.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	30.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0	70.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	30.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.3	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	60.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.1	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	.	75.0	33.3	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	44.4	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	22.2	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.6	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	100.0	70.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	1.9	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	10.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	70.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.7	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	100.0	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	1	2	3	2

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.3	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	66.7	66.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	2	3	3	2

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.3	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0	33.3	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	66.7	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	5

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.4	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	50.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	80.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	25.0	70.0	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	75.0	30.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.6	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	50.0	62.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	66.7	50.0	37.5	25.0
Total (N)	3	2	8	4

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	2.7	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0	66.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	33.3	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	2	2	6	3

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	3.3	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	.	66.7	75.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	66.7	.	12.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	3	8	5

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.5	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7	62.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	33.3	25.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	12.5	25.0
Total (N)	2	3	8	4

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0	57.1	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	14.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0	14.3	.
Total (N)	2	2	7	3

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.0	2.4	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	.	.	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	100.0	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	100.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	1	1	5	2

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	2.3	2.6	2.0
4: A lot (%)	.	.	20.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	.
2: A little (%)	.	75.0	40.0	.
1: None at all (%)	75.0	.	10.0	66.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	2.8	2.2
4: Very likely (%)	25.0	.	20.0	33.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	25.0	75.0	50.0	.
2: Not very likely (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	16.7
1: Not at all likely (%)	25.0	.	10.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0	77.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	22.2	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	33.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	9	6

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	100.0	60.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	40.0	16.7
Total (N)	2	2	5	6

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	50.0	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	25.0	25.0
Total (N)	1	4	4	4

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.5	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	100.0	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	50.0	33.3
Total (N)	2	1	4	3

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.7	2.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	66.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	33.3	85.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	14.3	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	3	3	7	6

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	100.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	25.0
Total (N)	1	1	4

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5	1.9	4.8
Once a week or more (%)	.	50.0	.	50.0
A few times a month (%)	25.0	.	.	33.3
A few times a semester (%)	.	.	30.0	.
Once a semester (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Never (%)	50.0	50.0	70.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	2.5	2.0	3.2
A few times a month (%)	.	25.0	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	.	.	30.0	60.0
Once a semester (%)	.	25.0	.	20.0
Once a year (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Never (%)	100.0	50.0	60.0	20.0
Total (N)	3	4	10	5

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.3	1.9	2.2
A few times a semester (%)	25.0	.	30.0	33.3
Once a year (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Never (%)	75.0	75.0	70.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	4.0	4.3
Once a week or more (%)	.	.	10.0	16.7
A few times a month (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	33.3
A few times a semester (%)	25.0	50.0	30.0	16.7
Once a semester (%)	50.0	.	20.0	33.3
Never (%)	.	25.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	1.8	1.7	3.2
Once a week or more (%)	.	.	.	16.7
A few times a month (%)	.	.	10.0	16.7
A few times a semester (%)	.	25.0	.	16.7
Once a semester (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Once a year (%)	.	.	10.0	16.7
Never (%)	100.0	75.0	70.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	1.8	3.0	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	.	50.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	25.0	.	10.0	16.7
2: A little (%)	.	75.0	30.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	2.0	1.5	1.5
4: Very likely (%)	.	.	.	16.7
3: Somewhat likely (%)	25.0	50.0	20.0	.
2: Not very likely (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	75.0	50.0	70.0	83.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	53.8	66.5	52.1	57.0
more than 60 hrs (%)	50.0	50.0	11.1	40.0
51 to 60 hrs (%)	.	50.0	33.3	20.0
41 to 50 hrs (%)	25.0	.	33.3	20.0
40 hrs or less (%)	25.0	.	22.2	20.0
Total (N)	4	4	9	5

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	57.5	47.5	46.0	38.5
more than 50% of time (%)	50.0	25.0	20.0	16.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	50.0	75.0	70.0	66.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	.	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	.	.	10.0	16.7
Yes (%)	100.0	100.0	90.0	83.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	50.0	50.0	40.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	50.0	.	30.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	100.0	70.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	50.0	90.0	83.3
Yes (%)	25.0	50.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	.	20.0	50.0
Yes (%)	75.0	100.0	80.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.5	8.8	7.7	11.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	.	10.0	33.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	75.0	40.0	50.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	100.0	25.0	50.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Yes (%)	100.0	100.0	90.0	100.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	.	20.0	16.7
Yes (%)	75.0	100.0	80.0	83.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	19.5	10.0	9.6	13.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	25.0	.	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	50.0	.	20.0	50.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	25.0	100.0	60.0	16.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	.	10.0	33.3
0% of time (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.3	8.8	9.3	6.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	.	10.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	16.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	.	10.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	50.0	50.0	20.0	50.0
0% of time (%)	25.0	25.0	40.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.8	3.8	3.4	8.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	.	.	16.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	.	10.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	25.0	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	75.0	25.0	30.0	33.3
0% of time (%)	25.0	50.0	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	66.7	50.0	25.0	66.7
Yes (%)	33.3	50.0	75.0	33.3
Total (N)	3	2	4	3

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	33.3	50.0	75.0	33.3
Yes (%)	66.7	50.0	25.0	66.7
Total (N)	3	2	4	3

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	50.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	.	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	2	4	3

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	33.3	50.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	66.7	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	2	4	3

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	50.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	.	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	2	4	3

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	9.3	8.8	13.3	16.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	.	.	33.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	50.0	25.0	40.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	.	60.0	50.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	50.0	75.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	50.0	70.0	83.3
Yes (%)	75.0	50.0	30.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Yes (%)	100.0	100.0	90.0	100.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	50.0	50.0	60.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0	40.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	.	50.0	66.7
Yes (%)	25.0	100.0	50.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	50.0	40.0	33.3
Yes (%)	25.0	50.0	60.0	66.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.8	5.0	0.2	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	25.0	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	25.0	50.0	10.0	.
0% of time (%)	75.0	25.0	90.0	100.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.5	7.5	10.5	4.2
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	25.0	10.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	.	20.0	16.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	.	20.0	16.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	50.0	.	.	.
0% of time (%)	50.0	75.0	50.0	66.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	50.0	50.0	70.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0	30.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	50.0	70.0	100.0
Yes (%)	25.0	50.0	30.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	100.0	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	50.0	70.0	66.7
Yes (%)	.	50.0	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	75.0	20.0	83.3
Yes (%)	25.0	25.0	80.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	75.0	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	75.0	25.0	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	75.0	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	.	25.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Never (%)	.	.	.	16.7
A few times (%)	25.0	50.0	60.0	66.7
About once per month (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	.
Two or three times per month (%)	.	25.0	20.0	16.7
At least once per week (%)	50.0	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Never (%)	25.0	50.0	50.0	83.3
Once or twice (%)	50.0	25.0	20.0	16.7
Three to five times (%)	.	25.0	20.0	.
Six to ten times (%)	.	.	10.0	.
More than 10 times (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	.	.	.	16.7
2 (%)	25.0	25.0	20.0	33.3
3 (%)	.	25.0	40.0	16.7
4 (%)	50.0	25.0	40.0	.
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	25.0	25.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

M7: Change how you spend your work time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
I would change how I spent time (%)	100.0	100.0	66.7	83.3
I would not change a thing (%)	.	.	33.3	16.7
Total (N)	3	4	9	6

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0	30.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	50.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	10.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	2.8	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	50.0	40.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	.	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.5	3.8	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	100.0	50.0	80.0	83.3
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	50.0	70.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	.	50.0	30.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	50.0	40.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	25.0	25.0	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	4	4	10	6

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	70.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	25.0	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	10	5

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	50.0	20.0