North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Design
by Rank/Tenure Status 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
..... No (%)	.	66.7	100.0
..... Yes (%)	100.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	12	12	3

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	41.7	75.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	12	3

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	25.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3	.
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	41.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.	66.7
Total (N)	12	12	3

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	66.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	16.7	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	8.3	.
Total (N)	11	12	3

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.1	4.0	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	27.3	27.3	.
4: Strong (%)	54.5	54.5	66.7
3: Average (%)	18.2	9.1	33.3
2: Weak (%)	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.4	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	36.4	22.2	.
4: Strong (%)	36.4	33.3	.
3: Average (%)	18.2	22.2	100.0
2: Weak (%)	.	11.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	9.1	11.1	.
Total (N)	11	9	2

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	.	.
4: Strong (%)	41.7	45.5	.
3: Average (%)	25.0	54.5	100.0
2: Weak (%)	8.3	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	12	11	3

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	33.3	10.0	.
4: Strong (%)	33.3	30.0	33.3
3: Average (%)	25.0	50.0	66.7
2: Weak (%)	.	10.0	.
1: Very weak (%)	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	10	3

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	2.7
4: Strong (%)	33.3	33.3	33.3
3: Average (%)	50.0	66.7	.
2: Weak (%)	8.3	.	66.7
1: Very weak (%)	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	9	3

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	9.1	.
4: Strong (%)	41.7	18.2	33.3
3: Average (%)	33.3	72.7	33.3
2: Weak (%)	8.3	.	33.3
1: Very weak (%)	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	11	3

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.0
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	.	.
4: Strong (%)	16.7	12.5	.
3: Average (%)	33.3	62.5	33.3
2: Weak (%)	25.0	25.0	33.3
1: Very weak (%)	16.7	.	33.3
Total (N)	12	8	3

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.3	5.0
A (%)	63.6	33.3	100.0
B (%)	36.4	58.3	.
C (%)	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	11	12	3

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.3	3.6	4.0
A (%)	50.0	8.3	33.3
B (%)	33.3	50.0	33.3
C (%)	16.7	33.3	33.3
D (%)	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	12	3

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.7	4.3	4.0
A (%)	66.7	33.3	33.3
B (%)	33.3	58.3	33.3
C (%)	.	8.3	33.3
Total (N)	12	12	3

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.3	4.2	3.7
A (%)	41.7	33.3	33.3
B (%)	50.0	50.0	33.3
C (%)	8.3	16.7	.
D (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	12	12	3

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.8	4.4	4.7
A (%)	75.0	41.7	66.7
B (%)	25.0	58.3	33.3
Total (N)	12	12	3

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.8	4.3	4.3
A (%)	75.0	25.0	33.3
B (%)	25.0	75.0	66.7
Total (N)	12	12	3

B4: Department's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	41.7	50.0	.
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.3	33.3	33.3
No clear vision (%)	25.0	16.7	66.7
Total (N)	12	12	3

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	8	10	1

B6: College's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	58.3	45.5	33.3
Vision with slow progress (%)	25.0	54.5	33.3
No clear vision (%)	16.7	.	33.3
Total (N)	12	11	3

B7a: Department change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Change for the better (%)	75.0	63.6	66.7
Change for the worse (%)	8.3	18.2	.
Not really change (%)	16.7	18.2	33.3
Total (N)	12	11	3

B7b: College change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Change for the better (%)	58.3	36.4	66.7
Change for the worse (%)	8.3	.	.
Not really change (%)	33.3	63.6	33.3
Total (N)	12	11	3

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Change for the better (%)	58.3	36.4	33.3
Change for the worse (%)	25.0	18.2	.
Not really change (%)	16.7	45.5	66.7
Total (N)	12	11	3

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	36.4	33.3
3: Good (%)	27.3	36.4	33.3
2: Fair (%)	27.3	18.2	33.3
1: Poor (%)	18.2	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	27.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	27.3	54.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.1	18.2	.
1: Poor (%)	27.3	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	11	3

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	27.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	30.0	63.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	20.0	.	.
1: Poor (%)	30.0	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	10	11	3

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	18.2	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	63.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	33.3	18.2	66.7
1: Poor (%)	22.2	.	.
Total (N)	9	11	3

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	50.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	30.0	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	30.0	.	33.3
1: Poor (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8	1.7
4: Excellent (%)	.	20.0	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	50.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	50.0	10.0	66.7
Total (N)	10	10	3

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	50.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	18.2	20.0	.
2: Fair (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	36.4	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.6	1.7
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	60.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	50.0	20.0	66.7
Total (N)	10	10	3

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	10.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	40.0	50.0	.
2: Fair (%)	40.0	40.0	.
1: Poor (%)	20.0	.	66.7
Total (N)	10	10	3

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	3.1	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	30.0	30.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	40.0	30.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	20.0	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	60.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	20.0	30.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	.	33.3
1: Poor (%)	30.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	66.7	50.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	22.2	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	10.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	9	10	3

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	50.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	27.3	30.0	.
2: Fair (%)	9.1	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	27.3	10.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	50.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	30.0	20.0	.
2: Fair (%)	20.0	20.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	20.0	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	60.0	70.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	30.0	10.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	20.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	30.0	.
3: Good (%)	72.7	30.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.1	40.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	45.5	50.0	.
2: Fair (%)	9.1	40.0	.
1: Poor (%)	36.4	.	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	36.4	50.0	.
2: Fair (%)	27.3	40.0	.
1: Poor (%)	27.3	.	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	45.5	10.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	18.2	60.0	66.7
2: Fair (%)	36.4	30.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	30.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	63.6	50.0	.
2: Fair (%)	.	20.0	66.7
1: Poor (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	30.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	10.0	40.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	20.0	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	1.7
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	.	.
3: Good (%)	36.4	70.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	18.2	30.0	.
1: Poor (%)	9.1	.	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	1.7
4: Excellent (%)	.	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	70.0	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	30.0	30.0	66.7
1: Poor (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	30.0	20.0	100.0
1: Poor (%)	20.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	72.7	80.0	66.7
3: Good (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	63.6	60.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	27.3	20.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	.	20.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	50.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	45.5	30.0	.
2: Fair (%)	27.3	20.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	40.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	36.4	30.0	.
2: Fair (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	18.2	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	36.4	10.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.1	30.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	9.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	1.5
3: Good (%)	50.0	62.5	.
2: Fair (%)	50.0	12.5	50.0
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	50.0
Total (N)	10	8	2

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	1.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.0	.
2: Fair (%)	66.7	33.3	.
1: Poor (%)	.	16.7	100.0
Total (N)	6	6	1

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	3.0
3: Good (%)	100.0	77.8	100.0
2: Fair (%)	.	11.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	9	2

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	42.9	50.0
3: Good (%)	75.0	28.6	50.0
2: Fair (%)	12.5	14.3	.
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	8	7	2

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	70.0	37.5	100.0
2: Fair (%)	.	12.5	.
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	10	8	2

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	66.7	44.4	100.0
2: Fair (%)	.	33.3	.
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	9	1

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	77.8	44.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	11.1	33.3	.
1: Poor (%)	11.1	11.1	50.0
Total (N)	9	9	2

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	22.2	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	22.2	100.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	44.4	.
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	10	9	2

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	54.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	18.2	45.5	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	36.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	18.2	63.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	36.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	27.3	54.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	11	3

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5	1.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	45.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	27.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	18.2	66.7
Total (N)	11	11	3

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	36.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	27.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	27.3	33.3
Total (N)	9	11	3

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	2.7
4: Very familiar (%)	81.8	54.5	.
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	18.2	27.3	66.7
2: Not very familiar (%)	.	9.1	33.3
1: Not at all familiar (%)	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.0
4: Very well (%)	9.1	.	.
3: Fairly well (%)	36.4	36.4	.
2: Not very well (%)	36.4	54.5	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	18.2	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.0
4: Very well (%)	18.2	9.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	45.5	36.4	.
2: Not very well (%)	27.3	45.5	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	9.1	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.0
4: Very well (%)	27.3	18.2	.
3: Fairly well (%)	36.4	36.4	.
2: Not very well (%)	27.3	36.4	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	9.1	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.3
4: Very well (%)	45.5	36.4	.
3: Fairly well (%)	.	36.4	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	36.4	18.2	66.7
1: Not at all (%)	18.2	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	27.3	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	36.4	.
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	27.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	27.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	36.4	45.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	18.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	18.2	40.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	36.4	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	36.4	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.1	20.0	.
3: Good (%)	54.5	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	27.3	30.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	14.3	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	14.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	57.1	50.0
1: Poor (%)	10.0	14.3	.
Total (N)	10	7	2

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	3.0
3: Good (%)	57.1	37.5	100.0
2: Fair (%)	42.9	50.0	.
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	7	8	1

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	77.8	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	30.0	.
Total (N)	9	10	1

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	77.8	25.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	37.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	9	8	1

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	1.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	28.6	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	57.1	.
Total (N)	7	7	1

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3	1.0
4: Very effective (%)	28.6	16.7	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	57.1	16.7	.
2: Not very effective (%)	14.3	50.0	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	.	16.7	100.0
Total (N)	7	6	1

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2	4.0
4: Very important (%)	63.6	27.3	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	36.4	63.6	.
2: Not very important (%)	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	81.8	63.6	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	18.2	27.3	.
2: Not very important (%)	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.3
4: Very important (%)	80.0	72.7	33.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.0	27.3	66.7
Total (N)	10	11	3

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	54.5	11.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	66.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	9	3

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	36.4	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	27.3	.
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	27.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	9.1	50.0
Total (N)	11	11	2

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	36.4	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	45.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	11	3

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	36.4	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	54.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	9	11	3

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	36.4	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	45.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	50.0
Total (N)	11	11	2

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	30.0	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	20.0	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	9	10	3

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	72.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	27.3	18.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	11	11	3

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	70.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	30.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	8	10	3

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	72.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	27.3	18.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	50.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	40.0	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	5	6	3

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.0	63.6	33.3
3: Agree (%)	20.0	27.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	10	11	3

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.8	70.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	9.1	10.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	70.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	42.9	10.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	7	10	3

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	66.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	22.2	22.2	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	9	3

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.8	70.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.4	66.7	66.7
3: Agree (%)	28.6	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	7	9	3

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.8	70.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	57.1	66.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	42.9	33.3
Total (N)	5	7	3

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.0	70.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	20.0	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.8	70.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.4	66.7	66.7
3: Agree (%)	28.6	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	7	9	3

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	62.5	66.7
3: Agree (%)	22.2	37.5	33.3
Total (N)	9	8	3

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	54.5	50.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	36.4	.
3: Some (%)	50.0	54.5	66.7
2: A little (%)	.	9.1	33.3
Total (N)	10	11	3

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	4.0
4: A great deal (%)	54.5	54.5	100.0
3: Some (%)	18.2	27.3	.
2: A little (%)	18.2	18.2	.
1: None (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	54.5	27.3	66.7
3: Some (%)	27.3	36.4	33.3
2: A little (%)	18.2	27.3	.
1: None (%)	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.8	1.7	1.0
3: Some (%)	27.3	27.3	.
2: A little (%)	27.3	18.2	.
1: None (%)	45.5	54.5	100.0
Total (N)	11	11	3

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	18.2	9.1	.
3: Some (%)	54.5	36.4	66.7
2: A little (%)	18.2	18.2	.
1: None (%)	9.1	36.4	33.3
Total (N)	11	11	3

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	.	18.2	.
3: Some (%)	54.5	9.1	.
2: A little (%)	9.1	36.4	100.0
1: None (%)	36.4	36.4	.
Total (N)	11	11	3

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.0	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	18.2	.
3: Some (%)	30.0	18.2	33.3
2: A little (%)	10.0	9.1	66.7
1: None (%)	10.0	54.5	.
Total (N)	10	11	3

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	40.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.8	70.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	9.1	30.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	20.0	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	22.2	.
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	77.8	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	9	3

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	.	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	57.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	28.6	50.0
Total (N)	10	7	2

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	40.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	9.1	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.3
Frequently (%)	27.3	20.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	45.5	70.0	.
Seldom (%)	18.2	.	33.3
Never (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.0
Frequently (%)	54.5	20.0	.
Sometimes (%)	18.2	60.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
Never (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.0
Frequently (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.9	2.7
Frequently (%)	72.7	40.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	18.2	20.0	.
Seldom (%)	9.1	30.0	66.7
Never (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9	2.0
Frequently (%)	9.1	10.0	.
Sometimes (%)	45.5	10.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	27.3	40.0	33.3
Never (%)	18.2	40.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.0
Frequently (%)	63.6	40.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	27.3	50.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	.	10.0	33.3
Never (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	3.7
Frequently (%)	27.3	10.0	66.7
Sometimes (%)	36.4	40.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	18.2	20.0	.
Never (%)	18.2	30.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1	2.3
Frequently (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Sometimes (%)	72.7	30.0	.
Seldom (%)	9.1	50.0	33.3
Never (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8	4.0
Frequently (%)	18.2	40.0	100.0
Sometimes (%)	9.1	20.0	.
Seldom (%)	27.3	20.0	.
Never (%)	45.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	60.0	70.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	30.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	60.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	30.0	10.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	70.0	50.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	40.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.7	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	90.0	70.0	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	10.0	30.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	70.0	40.0	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	10.0	60.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	80.0	60.0	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	40.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	60.0	30.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	30.0	60.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	10	3

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	50.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	57.1	20.0	66.7
Total (N)	7	10	3

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	44.4	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	37.5	33.3	66.7
Total (N)	8	9	3

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	44.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	9	3

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	66.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	62.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	25.0	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	12.5	.
Total (N)	11	8	3

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	37.5	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	62.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	8	3

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	54.5	22.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	55.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	9	3

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	66.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	11.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	9	3

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	2.3
3: Agree (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	50.0	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	45.5	.	.
Total (N)	11	8	3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	37.5	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	12.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	8	3

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	77.8	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	11.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	9	3

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.6	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	44.4	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	60.0	33.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	10	9	3

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	88.9	71.4	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	9	7	3

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.9	2.1	1.3
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	44.4	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	44.4	22.2	66.7
Total (N)	9	9	3

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	62.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	44.4	12.5	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	25.0	33.3
Total (N)	9	8	3

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	85.7	28.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	28.6	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	28.6	.
Total (N)	7	7	2

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	44.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	22.2	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	22.2	33.3
Total (N)	10	9	3

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	40.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	40.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	2

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	36.4	33.3	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	33.3	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	11	9	2

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	6	1

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	10	9	3

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.5	33.3	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	44.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	22.2	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	25.0	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	62.5	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	12.5	.
Total (N)	11	8	3

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.1	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	44.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	8	9	2

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Yes (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
No (%)	90.9	80.0	33.3
Don't know (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0	3.0
4: Very helpful (%)	100.0	100.0	.
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	1	2	1

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	1.3
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	33.3	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	66.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.	66.7
Total (N)	7	3	3

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	66.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	33.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.	33.3
Total (N)	6	3	3

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	1.0
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	66.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	66.7	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	6	3	1

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	1.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	66.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	5	3	1

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	75.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	71.4	.	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	7	4	1

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	16.7	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	66.7	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	25.0	.
Total (N)	6	4	1

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	60.0	.	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	25.0	.
Total (N)	5	4	2

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	30.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	40.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	2

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	20.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	2

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	37.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	30.0	25.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	25.0	.
Total (N)	10	8	3

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	37.5	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	37.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	12.5	.
Total (N)	11	8	2

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	37.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	25.0	.
Total (N)	11	8	2

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	30.0	62.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.0	12.5	.
Total (N)	10	8	2

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	25.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	12.5	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	37.5	50.0
Total (N)	11	8	2

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	30.0	37.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	25.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	12.5	.
Total (N)	10	8	2

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	2.7
4: Very well (%)	45.5	40.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	54.5	20.0	66.7
2: Not very well (%)	.	30.0	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	45.5	10.0	33.3
Yes (%)	54.5	90.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	9.1	50.0	100.0
Yes (%)	90.9	50.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	.	60.0	100.0
Yes (%)	100.0	40.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	100.0	100.0	66.7
Yes (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	2.7
4: Very well (%)	63.6	30.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	27.3	60.0	66.7
2: Not very well (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	2.0
4: Very well (%)	63.6	40.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	27.3	30.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	9.1	30.0	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	66.7	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	16.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	16.7	.
Total (N)	11	6	1

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	57.1
3: Agree (%)	45.5	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	28.6
Total (N)	11	7

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	40.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	40.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	63.6	28.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	14.3	50.0
Total (N)	11	7	2

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1	2.3
3: Agree (%)	20.0	42.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	60.0	28.6	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	28.6	.
Total (N)	10	7	3

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	28.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	14.3	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	28.6	.
Total (N)	11	7	3

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	50.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	16.7	.
Total (N)	11	6	3

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	30.0	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	20.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	5	2

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	55.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	50.0
Total (N)	11	9	2

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	77.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.	50.0
Total (N)	10	9	2

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	77.8	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	11	9	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	70.0	57.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	28.6	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	7	3

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	62.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	12.5	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	8	3

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	62.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	12.5	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	8	3

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Has experience (%)	100.0	50.0	.
No experience (%)	.	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	18.2	70.0	100.0
Yes (%)	81.8	30.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	18.2	70.0	100.0
Yes (%)	81.8	30.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	72.7	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	27.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	90.9	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	9.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	25.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	37.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	10	8	1

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.0
3: Agree (%)	54.5	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	25.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	11	8	3

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	28.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	42.9	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	28.6	.
Total (N)	11	7	1

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	28.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	42.9	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	28.6	.
Total (N)	10	7	2

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	16.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	33.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	10	6	1

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	40.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	40.0	.
Total (N)	9	5	1

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	20.0
Total (N)	8	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	20.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	60.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	5	1

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	57.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	14.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	33.3
Total (N)	10	7	3

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	70.0	14.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	57.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	10	7	2

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	11.1	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	44.4	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	44.4	33.3
Total (N)	9	9	3

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	66.7	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	8	3	1

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	12.5	.	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	8	5	2

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4	2.3
4: Very well (%)	54.5	10.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	27.3	40.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	.	30.0	66.7
1: Not at all (%)	18.2	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	30.0	75.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	8	2

J4: I have access to benefits information	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	.	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	71.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	14.3	50.0
Total (N)	10	7	2

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	77.8	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	.	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	20.0	.
Total (N)	9	5	2

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	87.5	66.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	8	3	1

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	44.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	54.5	44.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	9	3

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.0
3: Agree (%)	63.6	66.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	33.3	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.3
3: Agree (%)	81.8	55.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	44.4	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	4.0
4: Very important (%)	72.7	55.6	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.3	33.3	.
2: Not very important (%)	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8	4.0
4: Very important (%)	72.7	77.8	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.3	22.2	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7	4.0
4: Very important (%)	63.6	77.8	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.3	11.1	.
2: Not very important (%)	9.1	11.1	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	72.7	66.7	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.3	22.2	.
2: Not very important (%)	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9	4.0
4: Very important (%)	72.7	88.9	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	18.2	11.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8	4.0
4: Very important (%)	63.6	77.8	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	18.2	22.2	.
2: Not very important (%)	9.1	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	10.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	36.4	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	36.4	60.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	30.0	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.4	30.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	30.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	3.2	1.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	50.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.	100.0
Total (N)	5	6	2

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	60.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	1.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	71.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	14.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	66.7
Total (N)	8	7	3

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	36.4	50.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	30.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	70.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.9	2.3	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	18.2	30.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	54.5	40.0	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	27.3	44.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	33.3	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	36.4	22.2	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	81.8	70.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	10.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	27.3	30.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	63.6	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	30.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	2	2

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	50.0	.
Total (N)	5	2	3

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	55.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	60.0	44.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	10	9	3

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	30.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	70.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	81.8	70.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	50.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	9	6	2

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	60.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	40.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	6	5	2

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	71.4	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	14.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	9	7	3

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	40.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	60.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	.	.
Total (N)	9	5	3

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	60.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	7	5	2

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	.
Total (N)	4	4	1

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1	1.3
4: A lot (%)	36.4	.	.
3: Some (%)	9.1	40.0	.
2: A little (%)	27.3	30.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	27.3	30.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.7
4: Very likely (%)	36.4	.	33.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	27.3	60.0	.
2: Not very likely (%)	18.2	10.0	66.7
1: Not at all likely (%)	18.2	30.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	30.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	50.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	30.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	71.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	28.6	.
Total (N)	7	7	1

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	80.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	6	5	2

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	66.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	5	3	2

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	9	8	2

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	1	1

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.6	2.3
Once a week or more (%)	36.4	10.0	.
A few times a month (%)	18.2	.	33.3
A few times a semester (%)	.	30.0	.
Once a semester (%)	.	10.0	.
Never (%)	45.5	50.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.3
A few times a month (%)	.	.	33.3
A few times a semester (%)	30.0	33.3	.
Once a semester (%)	20.0	.	.
Once a year (%)	.	11.1	.
Never (%)	50.0	55.6	66.7
Total (N)	10	9	3

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.7	1.9	2.0
A few times a semester (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
Once a year (%)	18.2	.	.
Never (%)	63.6	70.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	4.1	4.1	3.0
Once a week or more (%)	9.1	10.0	.
A few times a month (%)	27.3	30.0	33.3
A few times a semester (%)	27.3	40.0	.
Once a semester (%)	36.4	10.0	33.3
Never (%)	.	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	1.6	1.0
Once a week or more (%)	9.1	.	.
A few times a month (%)	9.1	10.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	18.2	.	.
Once a semester (%)	.	10.0	.
Once a year (%)	18.2	.	.
Never (%)	45.5	80.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	63.6	20.0	.
3: Some (%)	.	20.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	27.3	40.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.5	1.7	1.7
4: Very likely (%)	9.1	.	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	9.1	30.0	33.3
2: Not very likely (%)	.	10.0	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	81.8	60.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean # Hrs Work	57.0	53.1	63.7
more than 60 hrs (%)	22.2	30.0	66.7
51 to 60 hrs (%)	44.4	10.0	33.3
41 to 50 hrs (%)	22.2	30.0	.
40 hrs or less (%)	11.1	30.0	.
Total (N)	9	10	3

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	41.0	50.0	53.3
more than 50% of time (%)	9.1	40.0	33.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	72.7	60.0	66.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	18.2	.	.
Yes (%)	81.8	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
Yes (%)	54.5	50.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	54.5	20.0	.
Yes (%)	45.5	80.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	81.8	90.0	33.3
Yes (%)	18.2	10.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	36.4	10.0	33.3
Yes (%)	63.6	90.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.9	8.5	6.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.1	20.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	63.6	20.0	33.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	27.3	60.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	9.1	.	.
Yes (%)	90.9	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	27.3	.	33.3
Yes (%)	72.7	100.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	12.3	10.6	17.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	.	33.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	36.4	20.0	33.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	45.5	60.0	33.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	9.1	20.0	.
0% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.3	8.4	8.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	10.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	36.4	30.0	66.7
0% of time (%)	36.4	40.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.5	1.7	4.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	9.1	50.0	100.0
0% of time (%)	63.6	50.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	75.0	20.0	66.7
Yes (%)	25.0	80.0	33.3
Total (N)	4	5	3

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	25.0	80.0	33.3
Yes (%)	75.0	20.0	66.7
Total (N)	4	5	3

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	75.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	5	3

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	75.0	100.0	33.3
Yes (%)	25.0	.	66.7
Total (N)	4	5	3

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	100.0	100.0	66.7
Yes (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	4	5	3

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	16.2	10.2	8.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	18.2	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	27.3	30.0	33.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	45.5	40.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	9.1	30.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	81.8	60.0	.
Yes (%)	18.2	40.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	9.1	.	.
Yes (%)	90.9	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	36.4	90.0	.
Yes (%)	63.6	10.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	63.6	40.0	33.3
Yes (%)	36.4	60.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	45.5	50.0	33.3
Yes (%)	54.5	50.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.9	1.0	1.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.1	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	30.0	33.3
0% of time (%)	90.9	70.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.9	9.6	0.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	20.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	18.2	10.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	27.3	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	10.0	33.3
0% of time (%)	54.5	60.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	63.6	60.0	33.3
Yes (%)	36.4	40.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	72.7	70.0	100.0
Yes (%)	27.3	30.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	90.9	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	54.5	80.0	100.0
Yes (%)	45.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	36.4	70.0	66.7
Yes (%)	63.6	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	45.5	60.0	33.3
Yes (%)	54.5	40.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	90.9	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	9.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Never (%)	9.1	.	.
A few times (%)	54.5	70.0	.
About once per month (%)	9.1	.	66.7
Two or three times per month (%)	27.3	10.0	.
At least once per week (%)	.	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Never (%)	54.5	50.0	66.7
Once or twice (%)	18.2	40.0	.
Three to five times (%)	18.2	10.0	.
Six to ten times (%)	9.1	.	.
More than 10 times (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	9.1	.	.
2 (%)	27.3	30.0	.
3 (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
4 (%)	27.3	30.0	33.3
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	18.2	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
I would change how I spent time (%)	72.7	87.5	100.0
I would not change a thing (%)	27.3	12.5	.
Total (N)	11	8	3

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.5	40.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	36.4	40.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.2	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	60.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	36.4	20.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.8	80.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	60.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	27.3	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	40.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	36.4	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	30.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	10	3

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	30.0	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	50.0	66.7
3: Some (%)	12.5	25.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	37.5	12.5	.
1: None at all (%)	25.0	12.5	.
Total (N)	8	8	3

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	22.2	66.7
3: Some (%)	45.5	44.4	33.3
2: A little (%)	27.3	22.2	.
1: None at all (%)	18.2	11.1	.
Total (N)	11	9	3

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	20.0	66.7
3: Some (%)	36.4	20.0	.
2: A little (%)	18.2	20.0	.
1: None at all (%)	36.4	40.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.2	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	50.0	66.7
3: Some (%)	45.5	30.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	27.3	10.0	.
1: None at all (%)	18.2	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	36.4	30.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	18.2	40.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	18.2	30.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	27.3	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.5	1.7	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	10.0	.
3: Some (%)	.	10.0	66.7
2: A little (%)	18.2	20.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	72.7	60.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	18.2	30.0	66.7
3: Some (%)	9.1	30.0	.
2: A little (%)	54.5	20.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	18.2	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	27.3	30.0	66.7
3: Some (%)	18.2	20.0	.
2: A little (%)	27.3	10.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	27.3	40.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	27.3	20.0	.
2: A little (%)	27.3	20.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	36.4	40.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	4.0
4: A great deal (%)	45.5	30.0	100.0
3: Some (%)	27.3	50.0	.
2: A little (%)	18.2	20.0	.
1: None at all (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	36.4	40.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	18.2	40.0	66.7
2: A little (%)	45.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	.	.	33.3
3: Some (%)	22.2	20.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	22.2	70.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	55.6	10.0	.
Total (N)	9	10	3

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	20.0	.
3: Some (%)	36.4	20.0	66.7
2: A little (%)	18.2	40.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	36.4	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8	1.5
4: A great deal (%)	18.2	30.0	.
3: Some (%)	18.2	30.0	.
2: A little (%)	45.5	30.0	50.0
1: None at all (%)	18.2	10.0	50.0
Total (N)	11	10	2

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.3	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	70.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	20.0	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.0
A lot more satisfied now (%)	9.1	30.0	.
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	36.4	30.0	66.7
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	27.3	10.0	.
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	18.2	10.0	.
A lot less satisfied now (%)	9.1	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	11	10	3

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No - never considered leaving (%)	.	10.0	33.3
Yes - not very seriously (%)	45.5	20.0	.
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	27.3	20.0	.
Yes - very seriously (%)	27.3	50.0	66.7
Total (N)	11	10	3

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No - never considered leaving (%)	54.5	40.0	.
Yes - not very seriously (%)	36.4	30.0	.
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	.	20.0	.
Yes - very seriously (%)	9.1	10.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	10	3

Endnote:

1. Rank and tenure status were combined for the present analysis. All non-tenure track respondents, regardless of rank, were grouped into the "Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)" category. The remaining faculty members were categorized by their rank as either Full, Associate, or Assistant Professors, regardless of whether or not they have achieved tenure. For example, among all respondents, 93.0 percent of Associate Professors are tenured, 3.3 percent are non-tenured/tenure track, and the remaining 3.7 percent are non-tenure track. For the analysis presented here, the 96.3 percent of Associate Professors who are tenure track (tenured and probationary) are included in the "Associate Professor (Tenure Track)" category. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007