North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Design
by Race/Ethnicity1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	White	Faculty of Color
..... No (%)	42.1	37.5
..... Yes (%)	57.9	62.5
Total (N)	19	8

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	12.5
3: Agree (%)	52.6	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	12.5
Total (N)	19	8

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	25.0
3: Agree (%)	36.8	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	26.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	12.5
Total (N)	19	8

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	12.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	23.5	25.0
4: Strong (%)	58.8	50.0
3: Average (%)	11.8	25.0
2: Weak (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	8

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	33.3	14.3
4: Strong (%)	33.3	28.6
3: Average (%)	20.0	42.9
2: Weak (%)	.	14.3
1: Very weak (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	7

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
5: Very strong (%)	5.6	.
4: Strong (%)	38.9	37.5
3: Average (%)	44.4	50.0
2: Weak (%)	5.6	.
1: Very weak (%)	5.6	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	17.6	25.0
4: Strong (%)	41.2	12.5
3: Average (%)	35.3	50.0
2: Weak (%)	5.9	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strong (%)	31.3	37.5
3: Average (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Weak (%)	12.5	12.5
1: Very weak (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	5.6	12.5
4: Strong (%)	38.9	12.5
3: Average (%)	38.9	75.0
2: Weak (%)	11.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	8

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
5: Very strong (%)	6.7	.
4: Strong (%)	20.0	.
3: Average (%)	33.3	62.5
2: Weak (%)	26.7	25.0
1: Very weak (%)	13.3	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.6	4.3
A (%)	61.1	37.5
B (%)	38.9	50.0
C (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.1	3.8
A (%)	31.6	25.0
B (%)	47.4	25.0
C (%)	15.8	50.0
D (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	8

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.5	4.3
A (%)	52.6	37.5
B (%)	42.1	50.0
C (%)	5.3	12.5
Total (N)	19	8

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	36.8	37.5
B (%)	52.6	37.5
C (%)	5.3	25.0
D (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	8

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6
A (%)	57.9	62.5
B (%)	42.1	37.5
Total (N)	19	8

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.5	4.5
A (%)	47.4	50.0
B (%)	52.6	50.0
Total (N)	19	8

B4: Department's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	42.1	37.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	31.6	37.5
No clear vision (%)	26.3	25.0
Total (N)	19	8

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	46.2	50.0
Total (N)	13	6

B6: College's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	50.0	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.3	50.0
No clear vision (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	18	8

B7a: Department change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	66.7	75.0
Change for the worse (%)	11.1	12.5
Not really change (%)	22.2	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

B7b: College change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	50.0	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	5.6	.
Not really change (%)	44.4	50.0
Total (N)	18	8

B7c: NC State change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	38.9	62.5
Change for the worse (%)	27.8	.
Not really change (%)	33.3	37.5
Total (N)	18	8

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	23.5	50.0
3: Good (%)	41.2	12.5
2: Fair (%)	17.6	37.5
1: Poor (%)	17.6	.
Total (N)	17	8

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	37.5
3: Good (%)	41.2	37.5
2: Fair (%)	11.8	12.5
1: Poor (%)	17.6	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	37.5
3: Good (%)	43.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	12.5	.
1: Poor (%)	25.0	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	25.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	62.5
2: Fair (%)	46.7	.
1: Poor (%)	6.7	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	57.1
3: Good (%)	37.5	28.6
2: Fair (%)	18.8	14.3
1: Poor (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	14.3
3: Good (%)	43.8	57.1
2: Fair (%)	6.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	43.8	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	35.3	57.1
3: Good (%)	23.5	.
2: Fair (%)	17.6	14.3
1: Poor (%)	23.5	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	14.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	.	14.3
1: Poor (%)	43.8	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	.
3: Good (%)	31.3	57.1
2: Fair (%)	31.3	42.9
1: Poor (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	16	7

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	28.6
3: Good (%)	31.3	28.6
2: Fair (%)	31.3	42.9
1: Poor (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	7

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	47.1	66.7
3: Good (%)	23.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	5.9	.
1: Poor (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	6

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	53.3	57.1
3: Good (%)	40.0	14.3
2: Fair (%)	6.7	14.3
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	41.2	42.9
3: Good (%)	23.5	28.6
2: Fair (%)	5.9	14.3
1: Poor (%)	29.4	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	42.9
3: Good (%)	25.0	14.3
2: Fair (%)	25.0	14.3
1: Poor (%)	12.5	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	62.5	57.1
3: Good (%)	25.0	14.3
2: Fair (%)	12.5	14.3
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	28.6
3: Good (%)	47.1	57.1
2: Fair (%)	29.4	14.3
1: Poor (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	7

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	17.6	.
3: Good (%)	29.4	71.4
2: Fair (%)	23.5	14.3
1: Poor (%)	29.4	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	17.6	.
3: Good (%)	23.5	71.4
2: Fair (%)	35.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	23.5	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	35.3	14.3
3: Good (%)	29.4	71.4
2: Fair (%)	35.3	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	28.6
3: Good (%)	47.1	57.1
2: Fair (%)	17.6	14.3
1: Poor (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	37.5	28.6
2: Fair (%)	18.8	42.9
1: Poor (%)	18.8	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	23.5	.
3: Good (%)	41.2	71.4
2: Fair (%)	23.5	14.3
1: Poor (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	71.4
2: Fair (%)	37.5	28.6
1: Poor (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	.
3: Good (%)	25.0	85.7
2: Fair (%)	50.0	.
1: Poor (%)	12.5	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Excellent (%)	70.6	85.7
3: Good (%)	23.5	14.3
2: Fair (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	71.4
3: Good (%)	35.3	.
2: Fair (%)	11.8	14.3
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	57.1
3: Good (%)	35.3	28.6
2: Fair (%)	29.4	14.3
1: Poor (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	35.3	28.6
3: Good (%)	23.5	42.9
2: Fair (%)	23.5	14.3
1: Poor (%)	17.6	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	28.6
3: Good (%)	35.3	.
2: Fair (%)	5.9	57.1
1: Poor (%)	5.9	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
3: Good (%)	30.8	85.7
2: Fair (%)	53.8	.
1: Poor (%)	15.4	14.3
Total (N)	13	7

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.6
3: Good (%)	25.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	50.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	8	5

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
3: Good (%)	92.3	85.7
2: Fair (%)	.	14.3
1: Poor (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	7

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	27.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	54.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	9.1	16.7
1: Poor (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	11	6

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	28.6
3: Good (%)	69.2	42.9
2: Fair (%)	.	14.3
1: Poor (%)	7.7	14.3
Total (N)	13	7

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	14.3
3: Good (%)	58.3	57.1
2: Fair (%)	8.3	28.6
1: Poor (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	7

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	.
3: Good (%)	61.5	57.1
2: Fair (%)	7.7	42.9
1: Poor (%)	23.1	.
Total (N)	13	7

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	28.6	14.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	14.3
2: Fair (%)	14.3	71.4
1: Poor (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	7

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	35.3	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.8	37.5
3: Agree (%)	41.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.1	37.5
3: Agree (%)	35.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	12.5
3: Agree (%)	35.3	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.4	25.0
Total (N)	17	8

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	12.5
3: Agree (%)	26.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	46.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very familiar (%)	58.8	62.5
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	29.4	25.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	5.9	12.5
1: Not at all familiar (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	8

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Very well (%)	.	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	35.3	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	52.9	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	11.8	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very well (%)	11.8	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	35.3	37.5
2: Not very well (%)	47.1	37.5
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very well (%)	23.5	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	23.5	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	47.1	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very well (%)	35.3	37.5
3: Fairly well (%)	17.6	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	41.2	12.5
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	25.0
Total (N)	17	8

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	25.0
3: Agree (%)	29.4	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	41.2	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	25.0
Total (N)	17	8

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	35.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	28.6
3: Good (%)	35.3	42.9
2: Fair (%)	11.8	14.3
1: Poor (%)	23.5	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	14.3
3: Good (%)	41.2	57.1
2: Fair (%)	35.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	25.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	41.7	42.9
1: Poor (%)	8.3	14.3
Total (N)	12	7

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
3: Good (%)	55.6	42.9
2: Fair (%)	44.4	42.9
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	9	7

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	12.5
Total (N)	12	8

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	14.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.
Total (N)	11	7

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	30.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.0	20.0
Total (N)	10	5

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very effective (%)	22.2	20.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	44.4	20.0
2: Not very effective (%)	11.1	60.0
1: Not at all effective (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	9	5

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Very important (%)	58.8	37.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	41.2	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5
4: Very important (%)	82.4	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.6	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Very important (%)	62.5	87.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	37.5	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	85.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	41.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	12.5
3: Agree (%)	37.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	12.5
3: Agree (%)	42.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	14	8

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.6	62.5
3: Agree (%)	23.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	30.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	8

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.6	62.5
3: Agree (%)	23.5	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	40.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	9	5

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.5	42.9
3: Agree (%)	17.6	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	62.5
3: Agree (%)	25.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.5	57.1
3: Agree (%)	38.5	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	13	7

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.4	57.1
3: Agree (%)	28.6	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.3	62.5
3: Agree (%)	18.8	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	25.0	42.9
Total (N)	12	7

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.3	62.5
3: Agree (%)	18.8	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0
Total (N)	9	6

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.3	57.1
3: Agree (%)	18.8	42.9
Total (N)	16	7

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.3	62.5
3: Agree (%)	18.8	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	57.1
3: Agree (%)	25.0	42.9
Total (N)	12	7

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.9	57.1
3: Agree (%)	23.1	42.9
Total (N)	13	7

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	50.0
3: Some (%)	25.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	25.0	12.5
1: Not at all (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	37.5	37.5
3: Some (%)	56.3	50.0
2: A little (%)	6.3	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8
4: A great deal (%)	52.9	75.0
3: Some (%)	17.6	25.0
2: A little (%)	23.5	.
1: None (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	8

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	41.2	50.0
3: Some (%)	35.3	25.0
2: A little (%)	17.6	25.0
1: None (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	8

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.5	2.1
3: Some (%)	17.6	37.5
2: A little (%)	11.8	37.5
1: None (%)	70.6	25.0
Total (N)	17	8

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	5.9	25.0
3: Some (%)	41.2	62.5
2: A little (%)	17.6	12.5
1: None (%)	35.3	.
Total (N)	17	8

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	.	25.0
3: Some (%)	23.5	37.5
2: A little (%)	41.2	12.5
1: None (%)	35.3	25.0
Total (N)	17	8

E9f: Interest in advising international students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	50.0
3: Some (%)	31.3	12.5
2: A little (%)	25.0	.
1: None (%)	25.0	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	28.6
3: Agree (%)	41.2	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.6	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.5	71.4
3: Agree (%)	23.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	57.1
3: Agree (%)	47.1	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	7

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	14.3
3: Agree (%)	47.1	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	.
3: Agree (%)	35.3	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	47.1	80.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	5

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	16.7
3: Agree (%)	30.8	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	38.5	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	16.7
Total (N)	13	6

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.9	28.6
3: Agree (%)	17.6	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4
Frequently (%)	35.3	.
Sometimes (%)	41.2	71.4
Seldom (%)	17.6	.
Never (%)	5.9	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
Frequently (%)	41.2	14.3
Sometimes (%)	29.4	57.1
Seldom (%)	23.5	14.3
Never (%)	5.9	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
Frequently (%)	52.9	28.6
Sometimes (%)	41.2	57.1
Seldom (%)	5.9	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
Frequently (%)	58.8	42.9
Sometimes (%)	17.6	14.3
Seldom (%)	23.5	28.6
Never (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	1.7
Frequently (%)	11.8	.
Sometimes (%)	35.3	14.3
Seldom (%)	29.4	42.9
Never (%)	23.5	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
Frequently (%)	58.8	28.6
Sometimes (%)	29.4	57.1
Seldom (%)	5.9	14.3
Never (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
Frequently (%)	29.4	14.3
Sometimes (%)	29.4	57.1
Seldom (%)	11.8	28.6
Never (%)	29.4	.
Total (N)	17	7

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
Frequently (%)	11.8	.
Sometimes (%)	41.2	57.1
Seldom (%)	29.4	28.6
Never (%)	17.6	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	3.4
Frequently (%)	29.4	57.1
Sometimes (%)	5.9	28.6
Seldom (%)	23.5	14.3
Never (%)	41.2	.
Total (N)	17	7

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	56.3	71.4
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.5	71.4
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	7

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	62.5	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	81.3	85.7
3: Satisfied (%)	18.8	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	62.5	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	62.5	85.7
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.8	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	38.5	42.9
Total (N)	13	7

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	38.5	42.9
Total (N)	13	7

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	43.8	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	37.5	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	43.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	46.7	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	37.5	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	37.5	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	33.3
Total (N)	16	6

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	6

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	56.3	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	78.6	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	14	5

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	1.7
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.6	57.1
Total (N)	14	7

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	50.0
Total (N)	14	6

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	77.8	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	28.6
Total (N)	9	7

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.7	28.6
Total (N)	15	7

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	42.9
Total (N)	15	7

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	12	6

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	7

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	58.8	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	16.7
Total (N)	17	6

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	28.6
Total (N)	12	7

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	White	Faculty of Color
Yes (%)	23.5	.
No (%)	70.6	100.0
Don't know (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

G6: Mentor helpfulness	White
Mean Rating	3.8
4: Very helpful (%)	75.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	25.0
Total (N)	4

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	.
Total (N)	10	3

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	9	3

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	7	3

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	6	3

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	62.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	8	4

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	25.0
Total (N)	7	4

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	57.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0
Total (N)	7	4

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	37.5	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	42.9
3: Agree (%)	37.5	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	52.9	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	42.9
3: Agree (%)	42.9	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	28.6
Total (N)	14	7

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	46.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	33.3
Total (N)	15	6

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	46.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	33.3
Total (N)	15	6

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	16.7
3: Agree (%)	42.9	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.4	16.7
Total (N)	14	6

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	26.7	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	15	6

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	40.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	5

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Very well (%)	29.4	57.1
3: Fairly well (%)	52.9	14.3
2: Not very well (%)	11.8	28.6
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	29.4	28.6
Yes (%)	70.6	71.4
Total (N)	17	7

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	23.5	71.4
Yes (%)	76.5	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	41.2	28.6
Yes (%)	58.8	71.4
Total (N)	17	7

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	94.1	100.0
Yes (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Very well (%)	47.1	28.6
3: Fairly well (%)	47.1	42.9
2: Not very well (%)	5.9	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very well (%)	47.1	42.9
3: Fairly well (%)	35.3	14.3
2: Not very well (%)	11.8	42.9
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	40.0
3: Agree (%)	46.2	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	40.0
Total (N)	13	5

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	41.7	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	33.3
Total (N)	12	6

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	.
3: Agree (%)	43.8	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	53.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	20.0
Total (N)	15	5

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	1.8
3: Agree (%)	33.3	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	53.3	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	40.0
Total (N)	15	5

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	14.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	28.6
Total (N)	14	7

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	14.3
3: Agree (%)	38.5	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	38.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	28.6
Total (N)	13	7

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	16.7
Total (N)	11	6

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	7

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	71.4	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	14	7

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	69.2	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	14.3
Total (N)	13	7

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	14.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

H13f: Department rewards professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	White	Faculty of Color
Has experience (%)	76.5	42.9
No experience (%)	23.5	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	41.2	71.4
Yes (%)	58.8	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	47.1	57.1
Yes (%)	52.9	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	82.4	85.7
Yes (%)	17.6	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	88.2	100.0
Yes (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	7

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	16.7
3: Agree (%)	38.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.8	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	16.7
Total (N)	13	6

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	43.8	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	35.7	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	20.0
Total (N)	14	5

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	35.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	20.0
Total (N)	14	5

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	41.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	20.0
Total (N)	12	5

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	41.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	33.3
Total (N)	12	3

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	80.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	20.0
Total (N)	8	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	23.1	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.2	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.
Total (N)	13	3

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	4

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	4

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.
3: Agree (%)	6.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	60.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	26.7	50.0
Total (N)	15	6

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	2

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	1.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	16.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	66.7
Total (N)	12	3

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very well (%)	29.4	28.6
3: Fairly well (%)	35.3	28.6
2: Not very well (%)	11.8	42.9
1: Not at all (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	7

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	33.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	16.7
Total (N)	14	6

J4: I have access to benefits information	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	52.9	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	7

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	30.8	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	30.8	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.1	16.7
Total (N)	13	6

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	4

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	87.5	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	8	4

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	.
3: Agree (%)	41.2	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	47.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	6

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
3: Agree (%)	52.9	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	41.2	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	16.7
Total (N)	17	6

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
3: Agree (%)	58.8	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	35.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	6

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	70.6	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.4	16.7
2: Not very important (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	17	6

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8
4: Very important (%)	76.5	83.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.5	16.7
Total (N)	17	6

J11c: Importance of family leave time	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	70.6	83.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.5	.
2: Not very important (%)	5.9	16.7
Total (N)	17	6

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Very important (%)	70.6	83.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.4	.
2: Not very important (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	17	6

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	76.5	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.6	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	6

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	64.7	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.5	.
2: Not very important (%)	5.9	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	6

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	.
3: Agree (%)	29.4	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	7

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	41.2	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	47.1	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.3	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	37.5	.
Total (N)	8	5

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	43.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	12	6

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	52.9	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.4	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.2	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	7

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	70.6	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	23.5	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.1	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.5	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	31.3	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	88.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	1.6
3: Satisfied (%)	41.2	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	58.8	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	85.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	7	1

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	White
Mean Rating	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0
Total (N)	10

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.7	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	7

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	71.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	7

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.5	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.2	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	42.9
Total (N)	10	7

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	7	6

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	6

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	16.7
Total (N)	11	6

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	37.5	.
Total (N)	8	6

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	40.0	.
Total (N)	5	4

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.6
4: A lot (%)	17.6	14.3
3: Some (%)	11.8	42.9
2: A little (%)	29.4	28.6
1: None at all (%)	41.2	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very likely (%)	23.5	14.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	23.5	71.4
2: Not very likely (%)	29.4	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	23.5	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	42.9
Total (N)	16	7

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	7

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	28.6
Total (N)	8	7

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	44.4	.
Total (N)	9	4

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	40.0
Total (N)	5	5

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	13	6

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0
Total (N)	4	2

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.9
Once a week or more (%)	23.5	14.3
A few times a month (%)	11.8	14.3
A few times a semester (%)	.	42.9
Once a semester (%)	.	14.3
Never (%)	64.7	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8
A few times a month (%)	6.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	18.8	50.0
Once a semester (%)	6.3	16.7
Once a year (%)	6.3	.
Never (%)	62.5	33.3
Total (N)	16	6

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.4	2.9
A few times a semester (%)	11.8	57.1
Once a year (%)	5.9	14.3
Never (%)	82.4	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	4.3
Once a week or more (%)	.	28.6
A few times a month (%)	35.3	14.3
A few times a semester (%)	23.5	42.9
Once a semester (%)	35.3	.
Never (%)	5.9	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.5	3.0
Once a week or more (%)	.	14.3
A few times a month (%)	5.9	14.3
A few times a semester (%)	5.9	14.3
Once a semester (%)	.	14.3
Once a year (%)	11.8	.
Never (%)	76.5	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	41.2	28.6
3: Some (%)	11.8	14.3
2: A little (%)	23.5	57.1
1: None at all (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	7

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.1	2.7
4: Very likely (%)	.	14.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	5.9	57.1
2: Not very likely (%)	.	14.3
1: Not at all likely (%)	94.1	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	White	Faculty of Color
Mean # Hrs Work	58.6	50.9
more than 60 hrs (%)	33.3	28.6
51 to 60 hrs (%)	33.3	14.3
41 to 50 hrs (%)	20.0	28.6
40 hrs or less (%)	13.3	28.6
Total (N)	15	7

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	45.9	47.1
more than 50% of time (%)	23.5	28.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	64.7	71.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.9	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	11.8	.
Yes (%)	88.2	100.0
Total (N)	17	7

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	52.9	28.6
Yes (%)	47.1	71.4
Total (N)	17	7

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	41.2	14.3
Yes (%)	58.8	85.7
Total (N)	17	7

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	76.5	85.7
Yes (%)	23.5	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	23.5	28.6
Yes (%)	76.5	71.4
Total (N)	17	7

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.3	8.6
11% to 25% of time (%)	11.8	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	41.2	42.9
1% to 5% of time (%)	47.1	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	5.9	.
Yes (%)	94.1	100.0
Total (N)	17	7

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	23.5	.
Yes (%)	76.5	100.0
Total (N)	17	7

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	12.2	12.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.9	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.5	42.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	52.9	42.9
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.8	14.3
0% of time (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.9	7.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.9	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	17.6	28.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.9	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	35.3	42.9
0% of time (%)	35.3	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.1	3.9
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.9	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.9	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	14.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	23.5	71.4
0% of time (%)	64.7	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	66.7	33.3
Yes (%)	33.3	66.7
Total (N)	6	6

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	50.0	50.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	6	6

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	100.0	83.3
Yes (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	6	6

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	66.7	83.3
Yes (%)	33.3	16.7
Total (N)	6	6

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	83.3	100.0
Yes (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	6	6

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	14.3	8.9
26% to 50% of time (%)	11.8	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	35.3	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	29.4	57.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	23.5	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	58.8	71.4
Yes (%)	41.2	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	5.9	.
Yes (%)	94.1	100.0
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	47.1	71.4
Yes (%)	52.9	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	47.1	57.1
Yes (%)	52.9	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	47.1	42.9
Yes (%)	52.9	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.6	2.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	14.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.8	28.6
0% of time (%)	88.2	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.6	9.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.9	14.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	11.8	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	17.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.9	14.3
0% of time (%)	58.8	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	58.8	57.1
Yes (%)	41.2	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	70.6	85.7
Yes (%)	29.4	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	94.1	100.0
Yes (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	76.5	57.1
Yes (%)	23.5	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	58.8	42.9
Yes (%)	41.2	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	52.9	42.9
Yes (%)	47.1	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	100.0	71.4
Yes (%)	.	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	5.9	.
A few times (%)	58.8	42.9
About once per month (%)	17.6	.
Two or three times per month (%)	11.8	28.6
At least once per week (%)	5.9	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	58.8	42.9
Once or twice (%)	23.5	28.6
Three to five times (%)	5.9	28.6
Six to ten times (%)	5.9	.
More than 10 times (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	5.9	.
2 (%)	17.6	42.9
3 (%)	17.6	42.9
4 (%)	35.3	14.3
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	7

M7: Change how you spend your work time	White	Faculty of Color
I would change how I spent time (%)	76.5	100.0
I would not change a thing (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	5

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	47.1	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.9	42.9
3: Agree (%)	35.3	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	82.4	71.4
3: Agree (%)	17.6	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.7	57.1
3: Agree (%)	29.4	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	7

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.9	28.6
3: Agree (%)	35.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	56.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	41.2	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	7

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	46.2	33.3
3: Some (%)	15.4	33.3
2: A little (%)	23.1	16.7
1: None at all (%)	15.4	16.7
Total (N)	13	6

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	28.6
3: Some (%)	50.0	28.6
2: A little (%)	25.0	14.3
1: None at all (%)	6.3	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	17.6	28.6
3: Some (%)	29.4	14.3
2: A little (%)	17.6	14.3
1: None at all (%)	35.3	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	35.3	28.6
3: Some (%)	35.3	42.9
2: A little (%)	17.6	14.3
1: None at all (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	35.3	28.6
3: Some (%)	29.4	28.6
2: A little (%)	23.5	28.6
1: None at all (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.6	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	.	28.6
3: Some (%)	17.6	.
2: A little (%)	23.5	14.3
1: None at all (%)	58.8	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	29.4	28.6
3: Some (%)	11.8	28.6
2: A little (%)	52.9	.
1: None at all (%)	5.9	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	29.4	42.9
3: Some (%)	17.6	14.3
2: A little (%)	29.4	.
1: None at all (%)	23.5	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	11.8	28.6
3: Some (%)	23.5	14.3
2: A little (%)	29.4	14.3
1: None at all (%)	35.3	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	58.8	14.3
3: Some (%)	23.5	57.1
2: A little (%)	17.6	14.3
1: None at all (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	41.2	28.6
3: Some (%)	35.3	28.6
2: A little (%)	23.5	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	6.7	.
3: Some (%)	26.7	14.3
2: A little (%)	40.0	57.1
1: None at all (%)	26.7	28.6
Total (N)	15	7

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	11.8	14.3
3: Some (%)	29.4	42.9
2: A little (%)	23.5	42.9
1: None at all (%)	35.3	.
Total (N)	17	7

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	14.3
3: Some (%)	18.8	28.6
2: A little (%)	37.5	42.9
1: None at all (%)	18.8	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.7
A lot more satisfied now (%)	11.8	28.6
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	35.3	42.9
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	17.6	14.3
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	17.6	.
A lot less satisfied now (%)	17.6	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	11.8	.
Yes - not very seriously (%)	35.3	14.3
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	17.6	28.6
Yes - very seriously (%)	35.3	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	41.2	42.9
Yes - not very seriously (%)	29.4	28.6
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	5.9	14.3
Yes - very seriously (%)	23.5	14.3
Total (N)	17	7

Back to top

Endnote:

1. "Faculty of Color" includes African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American respondents. Due to small cell sizes at this level of analysis,
this categorization of race/ethnicity was necessary to protect respondent confidentiality. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

Return to Design Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page