North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Textiles
by Rank/Tenure Status 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
..... No (%)	50.0	87.5	100.0	100.0
..... Yes (%)	50.0	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	28.6	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	57.1	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	14.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	7	5	2

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	.	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	50.0	20.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	25.0	40.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	3.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	14.3	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	42.9	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	42.9	.	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	7	5	2

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.1	4.4	4.6	4.5
5: Very strong (%)	50.0	37.5	60.0	50.0
4: Strong (%)	28.6	62.5	40.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	7.1	.	.	.
2: Weak (%)	7.1	.	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	4.1	4.2	4.5
5: Very strong (%)	35.7	37.5	60.0	50.0
4: Strong (%)	35.7	50.0	.	50.0
3: Average (%)	14.3	.	40.0	.
2: Weak (%)	7.1	12.5	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	4.3	4.4	4.5
5: Very strong (%)	14.3	37.5	60.0	50.0
4: Strong (%)	50.0	50.0	20.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	21.4	12.5	20.0	.
2: Weak (%)	14.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Strong (%)	.	25.0	50.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	28.6	25.0	.	.
2: Weak (%)	42.9	50.0	50.0	50.0
1: Very weak (%)	28.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	7	4	2	2

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	4.0	4.0	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	14.3	40.0	.
4: Strong (%)	41.7	71.4	20.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	33.3	14.3	40.0	.
2: Weak (%)	8.3	.	.	50.0
1: Very weak (%)	8.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	2

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	4.4	4.8	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	25.0	50.0	80.0	.
4: Strong (%)	50.0	37.5	20.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	8.3	12.5	.	50.0
2: Weak (%)	16.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	2

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	4.3	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	7.1	12.5	50.0	.
4: Strong (%)	42.9	37.5	25.0	.
3: Average (%)	42.9	50.0	25.0	100.0
1: Very weak (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	4	2

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.1	4.4	4.6	5.0
A (%)	28.6	37.5	60.0	100.0
B (%)	57.1	62.5	40.0	.
C (%)	14.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0	4.2	4.5
A (%)	21.4	25.0	20.0	50.0
B (%)	57.1	50.0	80.0	50.0
C (%)	21.4	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.1	4.6	4.4	4.0
A (%)	28.6	62.5	40.0	50.0
B (%)	50.0	37.5	60.0	.
C (%)	21.4	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	4.5	4.8	4.0
A (%)	.	50.0	80.0	.
B (%)	78.6	50.0	20.0	100.0
C (%)	21.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.3	4.5	4.6	4.5
A (%)	28.6	62.5	60.0	50.0
B (%)	71.4	25.0	40.0	50.0
C (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5	4.6	4.5
A (%)	42.9	62.5	60.0	50.0
B (%)	57.1	25.0	40.0	50.0
C (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B4: Department's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	64.3	37.5	60.0	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	7.1	12.5	.	.
No clear vision (%)	28.6	50.0	40.0	50.0
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	4.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	50.0	100.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	50.0	.	100.0
Total (N)	10	4	3	1

B6: College's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	21.4	37.5	40.0	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	50.0	12.5	20.0	.
No clear vision (%)	28.6	50.0	40.0	50.0
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B7a: Department change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	57.1	62.5	80.0	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	35.7	.	.	.
Not really change (%)	7.1	37.5	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B7b: College change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	50.0	50.0	60.0	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	28.6	.	20.0	.
Not really change (%)	21.4	50.0	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	57.1	37.5	60.0	100.0
Change for the worse (%)	21.4	.	.	.
Not really change (%)	21.4	62.5	40.0	.
Total (N)	14	8	5	2

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	25.0	40.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	61.5	12.5	20.0	.
2: Fair (%)	15.4	25.0	40.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	37.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	2

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	3.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	25.0	60.0	.
3: Good (%)	38.5	37.5	40.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	7.7	12.5	.	50.0
1: Poor (%)	23.1	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	2

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	3.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	25.0	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	23.1	25.0	40.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.8	25.0	20.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	23.1	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	2

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	3.0	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	12.5	.	.
3: Good (%)	23.1	12.5	100.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	46.2	75.0	.	.
1: Poor (%)	7.7	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	13	8	3	2

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.4	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	42.9	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	46.2	28.6	60.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	7.7	.	.	.
1: Poor (%)	15.4	28.6	.	50.0
Total (N)	13	7	5	2

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.8	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	25.0	20.0	.
3: Good (%)	15.4	12.5	40.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	25.0	40.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	15.4	37.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	2

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.0	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	14.3	60.0	.
3: Good (%)	16.7	28.6	20.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	25.0	.	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	8.3	57.1	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	2

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.7	1.8	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	14.3	.	50.0
3: Good (%)	25.0	.	20.0	.
2: Fair (%)	33.3	28.6	40.0	.
1: Poor (%)	25.0	57.1	40.0	50.0
Total (N)	12	7	5	2

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	3.4	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	12.5	40.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	46.2	25.0	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	23.1	50.0	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	41.7	28.6	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	14.3	40.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	16.7	14.3	.	.
1: Poor (%)	8.3	42.9	20.0	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	1

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6	3.4	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	54.5	25.0	40.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	18.2	37.5	60.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	27.3	12.5	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	11	8	5	2

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	3.4	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	60.0	28.6	40.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	30.0	42.9	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	10.0	14.3	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	10	7	5	1

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	3.4	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	25.0	40.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	23.1	25.0	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	38.5	25.0	.	.
1: Poor (%)	7.7	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	25.0	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	30.8	12.5	40.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	23.1	25.0	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	15.4	37.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	63.6	50.0	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	36.4	25.0	60.0	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	11	8	5	1

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0	2.8	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	20.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	15.4	25.0	40.0	.
2: Fair (%)	46.2	50.0	40.0	.
1: Poor (%)	38.5	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.8	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	14.3	20.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	30.8	.	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	23.1	71.4	.	.
1: Poor (%)	30.8	14.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	1.7	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	.	20.0	.
3: Good (%)	23.1	.	40.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	66.7	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	30.8	33.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	6	5	1

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	28.6	50.0	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	42.9	25.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	28.6	25.0	.
Total (N)	10	7	4	1

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	.
3: Good (%)	46.2	.	40.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	30.8	62.5	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	15.4	25.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	.	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	15.4	28.6	60.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	28.6	.	.
1: Poor (%)	23.1	42.9	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.7	1.6	3.0	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	50.0	.
3: Good (%)	20.0	14.3	.	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	28.6	50.0	.
1: Poor (%)	50.0	57.1	.	50.0
Total (N)	10	7	4	2

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	3.4	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	.	40.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	50.0	37.5	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	25.0	50.0	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	1.6	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	.	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	38.5	14.3	25.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	23.1	28.6	25.0	.
1: Poor (%)	15.4	57.1	25.0	.
Total (N)	13	7	4	1

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	40.0	25.0	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	40.0	75.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	10.0	.	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	5	4	1

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	3.4	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	58.3	28.6	40.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	28.6	60.0	.
2: Fair (%)	8.3	42.9	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	1

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	3.5	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	16.7	50.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	33.3	50.0	.
2: Fair (%)	41.7	50.0	.	.
1: Poor (%)	16.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	6	4	1

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	14.3	50.0	.
3: Good (%)	38.5	28.6	.	100.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	14.3	50.0	.
1: Poor (%)	7.7	42.9	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	4	1

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	54.5	50.0	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	45.5	25.0	60.0	100.0
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	11	8	5	1

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9	2.6	2.0
3: Good (%)	25.0	14.3	60.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	66.7	57.1	40.0	.
1: Poor (%)	8.3	28.6	.	50.0
Total (N)	12	7	5	2

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	1.6	2.5	2.0
3: Good (%)	30.0	20.0	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	40.0	20.0	50.0	.
1: Poor (%)	30.0	60.0	.	50.0
Total (N)	10	5	2	2

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	3.3	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	.	50.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	50.0	42.9	25.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	57.1	25.0	.
1: Poor (%)	10.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	10	7	4	2

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	16.7	50.0	.
3: Good (%)	80.0	66.7	50.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	10.0	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	10	6	4	1

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	3.2	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	36.4	14.3	40.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	63.6	57.1	40.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	28.6	20.0	.
Total (N)	11	7	5	2

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.3	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	16.7	33.3	50.0
3: Good (%)	50.0	50.0	66.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	33.3	.	.
1: Poor (%)	10.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	10	6	3	2

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	3.3	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	20.0	33.3	50.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	40.0	66.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	.	.	.
1: Poor (%)	10.0	40.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	5	3	2

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7	3.5	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	28.6	50.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	70.0	42.9	50.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	.	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	10	7	4	2

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6	3.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	75.0	80.0	.
3: Agree (%)	30.8	12.5	20.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.6	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	62.5	60.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	30.8	25.0	40.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	3.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.2	25.0	80.0	.
3: Agree (%)	38.5	25.0	20.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.9	1.9	2.5	3.0
3: Agree (%)	23.1	12.5	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	46.2	62.5	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.8	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.6	3.0
3: Agree (%)	61.5	25.0	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.8	50.0	40.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8	3.6	3.0
4: Very familiar (%)	66.7	75.0	60.0	.
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	33.3	25.0	40.0	100.0
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	2.2	2.0
3: Fairly well (%)	23.1	12.5	40.0	.
2: Not very well (%)	76.9	75.0	40.0	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	12.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9	2.4	2.0
3: Fairly well (%)	30.8	.	60.0	.
2: Not very well (%)	69.2	87.5	20.0	100.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	12.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	2.6	3.0
4: Very well (%)	7.7	.	20.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	53.8	25.0	40.0	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	38.5	62.5	20.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	.	12.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.3	3.0	3.0
4: Very well (%)	38.5	12.5	20.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	46.2	25.0	60.0	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	15.4	37.5	20.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	28.6	.	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	14.3	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	42.9	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	25.0	80.0	.
3: Agree (%)	38.5	50.0	20.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	12.5	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	3.2	4.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	12.5	40.0	100.0
3: Good (%)	38.5	25.0	40.0	.
2: Fair (%)	7.7	50.0	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	23.1	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	40.0	.
3: Good (%)	46.2	50.0	40.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	46.2	37.5	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	3.0	3.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	60.0	100.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	50.0	20.0	.	.
1: Poor (%)	10.0	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	5	2	1

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	3.0	3.0
3: Good (%)	55.6	50.0	100.0	100.0
2: Fair (%)	44.4	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	9	4	4	1

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	69.2	50.0	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	25.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	4	2	1

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	81.8	75.0	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	11	4	3	1

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	40.0	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	40.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	12	5	2	1

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	42.9	.	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	42.9	66.7	100.0
2: Not very effective (%)	.	33.3	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	7	3	1

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	30.8	75.0	60.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	61.5	25.0	40.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	2

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	61.5	62.5	60.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.8	25.0	40.0	.
2: Not very important (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4	3.0
4: Very important (%)	30.8	37.5	20.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	46.2	62.5	60.0
2: Not very important (%)	15.4	.	20.0
1: Not at all important (%)	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	37.5	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	12.5	25.0	.
Total (N)	12	8	4	1

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	57.1	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	14.3	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	66.7	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	.	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	6	5	1

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.4	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	57.1	40.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	14.3	60.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	14.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	1

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	50.0	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	25.0	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	12.5	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	37.5	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	57.1	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	41.7	14.3	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	14.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	1

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	37.5	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	37.5	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.0	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	66.7	.	100.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	33.3	100.0	.
Total (N)	9	3	2	1

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	50.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	12.5	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	37.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	57.1	50.0
Total (N)	7	2

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	62.5	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	25.0	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	62.5	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	12.5	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	71.4	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	.	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	4	1

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	4.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	100.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	.	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	7	1	1	1

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	57.1	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	28.6	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	1

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	33.3	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	22.2	66.7	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	9	3	4	1

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	57.1	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	36.4	14.3	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	11	7	5	1

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	50.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	.
Total (N)	6	2	1

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	66.7	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	12	6	4	1

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	83.3	60.0	.
3: Agree (%)	27.3	16.7	40.0	100.0
Total (N)	11	6	5	1

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.7	57.1	60.0
3: Agree (%)	27.3	14.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	28.6	.
Total (N)	11	7	5

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	100.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.	50.0
Total (N)	4	1	2

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.8	4.0
4: A great deal (%)	23.1	37.5	40.0	100.0
3: Some (%)	61.5	37.5	20.0	.
2: A little (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	9.1	.	20.0
3: Some (%)	27.3	37.5	20.0
2: A little (%)	18.2	50.0	20.0
1: Not at all (%)	45.5	12.5	40.0
Total (N)	11	8	5

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.6	4.0
4: A great deal (%)	53.8	62.5	60.0	100.0
3: Some (%)	30.8	37.5	40.0	.
2: A little (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4	3.6	1.0
4: A great deal (%)	38.5	62.5	60.0	.
3: Some (%)	15.4	12.5	40.0	.
2: A little (%)	30.8	25.0	.	.
1: None (%)	15.4	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.5	2.3	2.6	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	7.7	12.5	40.0	.
3: Some (%)	7.7	37.5	20.0	.
2: A little (%)	15.4	12.5	.	100.0
1: None (%)	69.2	37.5	40.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.8	4.0
4: A great deal (%)	30.8	12.5	20.0	100.0
3: Some (%)	30.8	50.0	40.0	.
2: A little (%)	23.1	25.0	40.0	.
1: None (%)	15.4	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0	2.5	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	15.4	.	.	.
3: Some (%)	.	37.5	75.0	.
2: A little (%)	23.1	25.0	.	100.0
1: None (%)	61.5	37.5	25.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.2	4.0
4: A great deal (%)	61.5	25.0	20.0	100.0
3: Some (%)	15.4	75.0	80.0	.
2: A little (%)	23.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	25.0	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	46.2	25.0	20.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	25.0	40.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	37.5	40.0
3: Agree (%)	46.2	62.5	60.0
Total (N)	13	8	5

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	12.5	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	76.9	75.0	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	25.0	20.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	61.5	25.0	60.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	50.0	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.9	2.3	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	12.5	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	18.2	12.5	.	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	54.5	62.5	80.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	11	8	5	1

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	25.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	25.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	.	.
Total (N)	9	4	4

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.4	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	37.5	60.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	46.2	25.0	20.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	37.5	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.5	3.4	1.0
Frequently (%)	30.8	50.0	60.0	.
Sometimes (%)	46.2	50.0	20.0	.
Seldom (%)	7.7	.	20.0	.
Never (%)	15.4	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.2	2.0
Frequently (%)	23.1	37.5	40.0	.
Sometimes (%)	53.8	37.5	40.0	.
Seldom (%)	15.4	25.0	20.0	100.0
Never (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.2	2.0
Frequently (%)	38.5	37.5	40.0	.
Sometimes (%)	46.2	50.0	40.0	.
Seldom (%)	15.4	12.5	20.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.2	1.0
Frequently (%)	53.8	37.5	40.0	.
Sometimes (%)	30.8	62.5	40.0	.
Seldom (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Never (%)	15.4	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	1.9	2.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	15.4	12.5	.	.
Sometimes (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	100.0
Seldom (%)	23.1	25.0	80.0	.
Never (%)	53.8	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.8	4.0
Frequently (%)	76.9	50.0	80.0	100.0
Sometimes (%)	15.4	37.5	20.0	.
Seldom (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	4.0	1.0
Frequently (%)	53.8	62.5	100.0	.
Sometimes (%)	30.8	25.0	.	.
Seldom (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Never (%)	7.7	12.5	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.0	1.0
Frequently (%)	23.1	25.0	.	.
Sometimes (%)	61.5	50.0	40.0	.
Seldom (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Never (%)	15.4	25.0	40.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.6	2.0
Frequently (%)	30.8	12.5	20.0	.
Sometimes (%)	46.2	62.5	40.0	.
Seldom (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	100.0
Never (%)	15.4	12.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	58.3	12.5	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	75.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	12.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.5	25.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	37.5	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	37.5	60.0
Total (N)	13	8	5

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.2	25.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	37.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	37.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	61.5	62.5	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	30.8	25.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	12.5	.
Total (N)	13	8	5

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.8	50.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	50.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	20.0
Total (N)	13	8	5

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.8	12.5	40.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	87.5	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.2	12.5	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	75.0	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1	1.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.0	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	42.9	20.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	28.6	40.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	28.6	40.0	.
Total (N)	10	7	5	1

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.1	2.8	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	37.5	80.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	37.5	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	25.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	76.9	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	13	8	5

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	25.0	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	62.5	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	1.0	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.	50.0	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	100.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	1	2	1

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	28.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	80.0	71.4	80.0
Total (N)	10	7	5

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	16.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	16.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	12	6	5

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	25.0	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	62.5	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.0	2.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	100.0	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	.	.	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	100.0	.	.
Total (N)	1	1	1	1

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	6	5	3

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	76.9	75.0	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	23.1	12.5	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	13	8	5

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	16.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	50.0	75.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	10	6	4

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.2	42.9	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	57.1	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	13	7	5

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	33.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	50.0	40.0
Total (N)	11	6	5

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.7	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	72.7	14.3	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	18.2	42.9	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	42.9	.	.
Total (N)	11	7	5	1

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.4	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	50.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	37.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	11	8	5

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.8	.	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	30.8	50.0	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.5	50.0	40.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	28.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	71.4	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	7	2

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	28.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	71.4	50.0
Total (N)	9	7	2

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	.	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	60.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	5	3

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	14.3	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	42.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	28.6	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	12	7	4

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.8	50.0	40.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	50.0	60.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.3	28.6	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	71.4	80.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	7	5

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	50.0	33.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.	66.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	12	6	3	1

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Yes (%)	23.1	75.0	100.0	100.0
No (%)	76.9	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.7	3.2	4.0
4: Very helpful (%)	33.3	66.7	40.0	100.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	33.3	33.3	40.0	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	33.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	3	6	5	1

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	71.4	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	13	7	5

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.1	14.3	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	57.1	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.5	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0
Total (N)	13	7	5

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	50.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	46.2	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	13	6	4

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	66.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	12	6	4

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	40.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	40.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	20.0	.
Total (N)	12	5	4

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	8	4	4

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	27.3	.	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	60.0	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	45.5	40.0	.
Total (N)	11	5	5

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	30.8	37.5	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	37.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	25.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	62.5	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	25.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	25.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	16.7	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	54.5	50.0	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	11	6	5	1

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	9	6	4

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	16.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	66.7	25.0
Total (N)	9	6	4

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	14.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	71.4	.
Total (N)	9	7	4

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	.	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	71.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	8	7	4

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	20.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	.	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	60.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	20.0	.
Total (N)	9	5	4

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.1	3.6	1.0
4: Very well (%)	61.5	25.0	60.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	38.5	62.5	40.0	.
2: Not very well (%)	.	12.5	.	.
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	38.5	.	20.0	100.0
Yes (%)	61.5	100.0	80.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	7.7	25.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	92.3	75.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	15.4	62.5	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	84.6	37.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	100.0	100.0	80.0	.
Yes (%)	.	.	20.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Very well (%)	76.9	12.5	20.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	23.1	75.0	80.0	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.6	3.0
4: Very well (%)	76.9	37.5	60.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	23.1	50.0	40.0	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.1	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	30.8	42.9	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	28.6	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	4	1

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	28.6	.	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	42.9	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	4	1

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	63.6	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	37.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	20.0
Total (N)	11	8	5

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	62.5	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	37.5	50.0	.
Total (N)	11	8	4	1

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.5	3.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	.	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	100.0	50.0	.
Total (N)	2	3	2	1

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	71.4	83.3	75.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	.	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	7	6	4	1

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	87.5	71.4	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	14.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	8	7	5	1

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.8
3: Agree (%)	81.8	50.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	16.7	.
Total (N)	11	6	5

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	.	50.0
3: Agree (%)	41.7	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	12	7	4

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	16.7	40.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	10	6	5

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0	2.0
3: Agree (%)	.	.	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	100.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	50.0
Total (N)	3	3	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	8	5	4

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	71.4	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	28.6	20.0
Total (N)	9	7	5

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	28.6	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	57.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	14.3	.
Total (N)	12	7	4

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Has experience (%)	92.3	50.0	.	.
No experience (%)	7.7	50.0	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	30.8	50.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	69.2	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	23.1	75.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	76.9	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	84.6	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	92.3	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	60.0	.
Total (N)	11	5	1

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	60.0	.
Total (N)	12	5	3

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	50.0	.
Total (N)	12	6	2

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	66.7	.
Total (N)	12	6	2

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	10	4

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	70.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	33.3
Total (N)	9	3

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	45.5	50.0	.
Total (N)	11	4	1

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	14.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	42.9	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	28.6	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	14.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	42.9	40.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	28.6	40.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	14.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	1

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	18.2	50.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	.	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.4	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	11	4	4

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.1	1.3	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	11.1	.	.
2: Disagree (%)	55.6	33.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	66.7	50.0
Total (N)	9	3	2

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	1.7	1.7	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	.	.	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	66.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	45.5	33.3	50.0
Total (N)	11	6	4

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	1.8	2.4	3.0
4: Very well (%)	23.1	.	20.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	38.5	25.0	20.0	100.0
2: Not very well (%)	15.4	25.0	40.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	23.1	50.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	12.5	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	37.5	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	50.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

J4: I have access to benefits information	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.4	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	25.0	40.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	69.2	75.0	60.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.	.
3: Agree (%)	11.1	20.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	44.4	40.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	40.0	.
Total (N)	9	5	4

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	66.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	33.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	3	4

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	1.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	85.7	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	100.0	.
Total (N)	7	1	2

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	15.4	25.0	50.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	53.8	62.5	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	28.6	.	.
3: Agree (%)	69.2	28.6	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	28.6	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	12.5	.	.
3: Agree (%)	61.5	50.0	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	25.0	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9	4.0	3.0
4: Very important (%)	53.8	87.5	100.0	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.5	12.5	.	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9	4.0	3.0
4: Very important (%)	61.5	87.5	100.0	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.8	12.5	.	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9	3.8	3.0
4: Very important (%)	61.5	87.5	80.0	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.5	12.5	20.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8	4.0	3.0
4: Very important (%)	53.8	75.0	100.0	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	46.2	25.0	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.6	3.0
4: Very important (%)	61.5	62.5	60.0	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.5	12.5	40.0	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.0
4: Very important (%)	69.2	75.0	60.0	.
3: Somewhat important (%)	15.4	12.5	40.0	100.0
2: Not very important (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.0	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	50.0	20.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	69.2	25.0	60.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	38.5	37.5	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	37.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	25.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	53.8	50.0	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	25.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.8	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.2	50.0	80.0	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	37.5	20.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	3.2	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.7	14.3	20.0	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	42.9	80.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	14.3	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	5	1

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	66.7	62.5	80.0
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	12	8	5

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.7	50.0	75.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	33.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	6	4

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	1.9	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	25.0	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.5	37.5	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	37.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	14.3	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	28.6	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	28.6	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	60.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	50.0	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	12.5	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.8	62.5	60.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	37.5	40.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.8	25.0	40.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	62.5	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.9	2.0	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	18.2	25.0	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	37.5	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	54.5	37.5	40.0	.
Total (N)	11	8	5	1

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.8	.	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	50.0	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	37.5	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	1.8	2.0	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	15.4	25.0	20.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	25.0	60.0	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	53.8	50.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	1.5	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	60.0	.	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	40.0	50.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	50.0	.
Total (N)	4	5	2	1

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5	2.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	22.2	50.0	25.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	50.0	50.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	55.6	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	9	8	4	1

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	12.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	62.5	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	25.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	11	8	5	1

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	87.5	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.2	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	84.6	87.5	80.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	3.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	75.0	60.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	12.5	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.0	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	71.4	100.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	28.6	.	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	3	1

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	100.0	100.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.	.	100.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	7	2	1

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	57.1	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	28.6	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	1

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	33.3	33.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	50.0	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	33.3	.
Total (N)	11	6	3	1

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	.	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	100.0	.
Total (N)	7	2	1

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	87.5	25.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	75.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	8	4	1

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.6	2.0
4: A lot (%)	61.5	50.0	.	.
3: Some (%)	15.4	12.5	60.0	.
2: A little (%)	.	25.0	40.0	100.0
1: None at all (%)	23.1	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	2.8	2.0
4: Very likely (%)	53.8	50.0	.	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	30.8	37.5	80.0	.
2: Not very likely (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	100.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	87.5	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	84.6	87.5	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	20.0	50.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	60.0	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	9	5	2	1

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	33.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	33.3	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	8	3	2	1

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	5	2	3

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	77.8	80.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	9	5	5

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	12	4	4

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.0	4.0
Once a week or more (%)	30.8	12.5	20.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	.	25.0	.	100.0
Once a semester (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Once a year (%)	7.7	25.0	.	.
Never (%)	53.8	37.5	80.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	2.5	4.0
Once a week or more (%)	7.7	.	.	.
A few times a month (%)	7.7	12.5	25.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	7.7	12.5	.	100.0
Once a semester (%)	15.4	12.5	25.0	.
Never (%)	61.5	62.5	50.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.2	1.0	1.8	1.0
Once a semester (%)	7.7	.	40.0	.
Never (%)	92.3	100.0	60.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	3.4	1.0
A few times a month (%)	7.7	.	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	15.4	12.5	60.0	.
Once a semester (%)	23.1	.	20.0	.
Once a year (%)	7.7	75.0	20.0	.
Never (%)	46.2	12.5	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	3.6	1.0
A few times a month (%)	7.7	.	20.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	38.5	25.0	40.0	.
Once a semester (%)	15.4	12.5	20.0	.
Once a year (%)	15.4	37.5	20.0	.
Never (%)	23.1	25.0	.	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.0	2.6	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	53.8	12.5	.	.
3: Some (%)	23.1	12.5	80.0	100.0
2: A little (%)	7.7	37.5	.	.
1: None at all (%)	15.4	37.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.4	3.0
4: Very likely (%)	69.2	62.5	40.0	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	15.4	25.0	60.0	100.0
2: Not very likely (%)	15.4	.	.	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean # Hrs Work	54.2	59.5	53.0	50.0
more than 60 hrs (%)	15.4	12.5	.	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	46.2	75.0	40.0	.
41 to 50 hrs (%)	23.1	12.5	60.0	100.0
40 hrs or less (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	35.4	45.3	43.0	5.0
more than 50% of time (%)	.	37.5	40.0	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	92.3	50.0	40.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.7	12.5	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	.	.	100.0
0% of time (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	.	12.5	.	100.0
Yes (%)	100.0	87.5	100.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	30.8	37.5	75.0	100.0
Yes (%)	69.2	62.5	25.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	7.7	25.0	.	100.0
Yes (%)	92.3	75.0	100.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	76.9	87.5	50.0	.
Yes (%)	23.1	12.5	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	7.7	12.5	.	100.0
Yes (%)	92.3	87.5	100.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	4	1

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.8	8.0	7.4	5.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	12.5	20.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	23.1	37.5	40.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	69.2	50.0	20.0	100.0
0% of time (%)	7.7	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	25.0	37.5	.	100.0
Yes (%)	75.0	62.5	100.0	.
Total (N)	12	8	4	1

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	25.0	25.0	.	.
Yes (%)	75.0	75.0	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	12	8	4	1

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	32.6	25.0	17.0	80.0
more than 50% of time (%)	.	.	.	100.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	84.6	50.0	20.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	37.5	40.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.7	.	.	.
0% of time (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.2	1.0	1.0	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.7	.	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.7	25.0	20.0	.
0% of time (%)	84.6	75.0	80.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.6	4.8	0.6	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	23.1	37.5	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	23.1	37.5	20.0	.
0% of time (%)	53.8	25.0	80.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	33.3	50.0	100.0
Yes (%)	66.7	50.0	.
Total (N)	6	6	1

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	66.7	50.0	.
Yes (%)	33.3	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	6	6	1

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	66.7	83.3	.
Yes (%)	33.3	16.7	100.0
Total (N)	6	6	1

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	33.3	50.0	100.0
Yes (%)	66.7	50.0	.
Total (N)	6	6	1

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	83.3	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	6	6	1

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	11.1	12.0	9.0	0.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	7.7	.	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.7	37.5	20.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	69.2	25.0	40.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.7	37.5	20.0	.
0% of time (%)	7.7	.	20.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	66.7	75.0	50.0
Yes (%)	33.3	25.0	50.0
Total (N)	12	8	4

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	25.0	37.5	25.0
Yes (%)	75.0	62.5	75.0
Total (N)	12	8	4

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	33.3	62.5	25.0
Yes (%)	66.7	37.5	75.0
Total (N)	12	8	4

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	75.0	50.0	25.0
Yes (%)	25.0	50.0	75.0
Total (N)	12	8	4

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
No (%)	50.0	50.0	75.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0	25.0
Total (N)	12	8	4

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.8	2.1	0.0	10.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.7	.	.	100.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	23.1	62.5	.	.
0% of time (%)	69.2	37.5	100.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	9.6	1.9	2.0	0.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	7.7	.	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.1	.	.	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.7	12.5	20.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	12.5	.	.
0% of time (%)	61.5	75.0	80.0	100.0
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	7.7	12.5	.	100.0
Yes (%)	92.3	87.5	100.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	69.2	87.5	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	30.8	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	61.5	50.0	80.0	100.0
Yes (%)	38.5	50.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	84.6	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	15.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	7.7	37.5	80.0	100.0
Yes (%)	92.3	62.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	53.8	50.0	80.0	100.0
Yes (%)	46.2	50.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	92.3	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Never (%)	.	12.5	.	100.0
A few times (%)	50.0	37.5	40.0	.
About once per month (%)	25.0	25.0	40.0	.
Two or three times per month (%)	8.3	25.0	20.0	.
At least once per week (%)	16.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Never (%)	66.7	87.5	60.0	.
Once or twice (%)	8.3	12.5	40.0	100.0
Three to five times (%)	25.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	12	8	5	1

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	30.8	.	.	.
2 (%)	15.4	12.5	20.0	100.0
3 (%)	38.5	37.5	20.0	.
4 (%)	15.4	25.0	40.0	.
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	.	25.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	8	5	1