North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Textiles
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	63.2	90.0
..... Yes (%)	36.8	10.0
Total (N)	19	10

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	22.2
3: Agree (%)	47.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	9

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	.
3: Agree (%)	57.9	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	20.0
Total (N)	19	10

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	11.1
3: Agree (%)	47.4	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	9

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.2
5: Very strong (%)	63.2	20.0
4: Strong (%)	21.1	80.0
3: Average (%)	5.3	.
2: Weak (%)	5.3	.
1: Very weak (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	10

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	42.1	40.0
4: Strong (%)	26.3	50.0
3: Average (%)	15.8	10.0
2: Weak (%)	10.5	.
1: Very weak (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	10

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	26.3	40.0
4: Strong (%)	42.1	50.0
3: Average (%)	21.1	10.0
2: Weak (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	19	10

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.8
4: Strong (%)	.	37.5
3: Average (%)	42.9	.
2: Weak (%)	28.6	62.5
1: Very weak (%)	28.6	.
Total (N)	7	8

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	18.8	10.0
4: Strong (%)	43.8	50.0
3: Average (%)	25.0	30.0
2: Weak (%)	6.3	10.0
1: Very weak (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	10

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	47.1	30.0
4: Strong (%)	41.2	40.0
3: Average (%)	.	30.0
2: Weak (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	10

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	15.8	11.1
4: Strong (%)	42.1	22.2
3: Average (%)	36.8	66.7
1: Very weak (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	9

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.5
A (%)	36.8	50.0
B (%)	52.6	50.0
C (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	19	10

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	4.2
A (%)	21.1	30.0
B (%)	57.9	60.0
C (%)	21.1	10.0
Total (N)	19	10

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.3
A (%)	42.1	40.0
B (%)	42.1	50.0
C (%)	15.8	10.0
Total (N)	19	10

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	4.4
A (%)	21.1	40.0
B (%)	63.2	60.0
C (%)	15.8	.
Total (N)	19	10

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5
A (%)	36.8	60.0
B (%)	63.2	30.0
C (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	19	10

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.6	4.3
A (%)	57.9	40.0
B (%)	42.1	50.0
C (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	19	10

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	68.4	30.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	10.5	.
No clear vision (%)	21.1	70.0
Total (N)	19	10

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	33.3
Total (N)	15	3

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	36.8	20.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	36.8	20.0
No clear vision (%)	26.3	60.0
Total (N)	19	10

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	57.9	70.0
Change for the worse (%)	26.3	.
Not really change (%)	15.8	30.0
Total (N)	19	10

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	47.4	60.0
Change for the worse (%)	21.1	10.0
Not really change (%)	31.6	30.0
Total (N)	19	10

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	52.6	60.0
Change for the worse (%)	15.8	.
Not really change (%)	31.6	40.0
Total (N)	19	10

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	10.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	20.0
2: Fair (%)	16.7	40.0
1: Poor (%)	5.6	30.0
Total (N)	18	10

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	20.0
3: Good (%)	38.9	40.0
2: Fair (%)	5.6	20.0
1: Poor (%)	16.7	20.0
Total (N)	18	10

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	10.0
3: Good (%)	27.8	30.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	40.0
1: Poor (%)	16.7	20.0
Total (N)	18	10

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	12.5
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	44.4	50.0
1: Poor (%)	5.6	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	22.2
3: Good (%)	44.4	44.4
2: Fair (%)	5.6	.
1: Poor (%)	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	10.0
3: Good (%)	22.2	20.0
2: Fair (%)	33.3	40.0
1: Poor (%)	11.1	30.0
Total (N)	18	10

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	47.1	22.2
3: Good (%)	23.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	17.6	11.1
1: Poor (%)	11.8	33.3
Total (N)	17	9

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.6
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	10.0
3: Good (%)	18.8	10.0
2: Fair (%)	43.8	10.0
1: Poor (%)	18.8	70.0
Total (N)	16	10

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	22.2
3: Good (%)	38.9	44.4
2: Fair (%)	27.8	22.2
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	47.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	29.4	37.5
2: Fair (%)	11.8	12.5
1: Poor (%)	11.8	37.5
Total (N)	17	8

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	56.3	20.0
3: Good (%)	25.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	18.8	10.0
1: Poor (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	16	10

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	64.3	22.2
3: Good (%)	28.6	55.6
2: Fair (%)	7.1	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	14	9

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	22.2
3: Good (%)	27.8	33.3
2: Fair (%)	27.8	22.2
1: Poor (%)	5.6	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	11.1
3: Good (%)	27.8	33.3
2: Fair (%)	22.2	22.2
1: Poor (%)	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	75.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	25.0	66.7
1: Poor (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	16	9

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	11.1
3: Good (%)	22.2	22.2
2: Fair (%)	44.4	44.4
1: Poor (%)	27.8	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	37.5
3: Good (%)	33.3	12.5
2: Fair (%)	33.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	22.2	25.0
Total (N)	18	8

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	12.5
3: Good (%)	23.5	25.0
2: Fair (%)	47.1	25.0
1: Poor (%)	23.5	37.5
Total (N)	17	8

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	46.7	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	57.1
2: Fair (%)	20.0	42.9
Total (N)	15	7

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	38.9	33.3
1: Poor (%)	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	23.5	11.1
3: Good (%)	23.5	44.4
2: Fair (%)	35.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	17.6	33.3
Total (N)	17	9

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.6
4: Excellent (%)	14.3	.
3: Good (%)	21.4	11.1
2: Fair (%)	28.6	33.3
1: Poor (%)	35.7	55.6
Total (N)	14	9

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	11.1
3: Good (%)	41.2	55.6
2: Fair (%)	23.5	33.3
1: Poor (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	9

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	23.5	.
3: Good (%)	35.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	23.5	25.0
1: Poor (%)	17.6	50.0
Total (N)	17	8

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	42.9	66.7
2: Fair (%)	7.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	14	6

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	68.8	11.1
3: Good (%)	18.8	66.7
2: Fair (%)	12.5	22.2
Total (N)	16	9

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	14.3
3: Good (%)	25.0	57.1
2: Fair (%)	37.5	28.6
1: Poor (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	7

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	.
3: Good (%)	29.4	37.5
2: Fair (%)	35.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	5.9	37.5
Total (N)	17	8

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	68.8	11.1
3: Good (%)	31.3	66.7
1: Poor (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	16	9

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
3: Good (%)	31.3	30.0
2: Fair (%)	62.5	40.0
1: Poor (%)	6.3	30.0
Total (N)	16	10

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8
3: Good (%)	28.6	40.0
2: Fair (%)	42.9	.
1: Poor (%)	28.6	60.0
Total (N)	14	5

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	12.5
3: Good (%)	46.7	37.5
2: Fair (%)	26.7	50.0
1: Poor (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	28.6	.
3: Good (%)	64.3	85.7
2: Fair (%)	7.1	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	43.8	11.1
3: Good (%)	50.0	66.7
2: Fair (%)	6.3	22.2
Total (N)	16	9

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	14.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	57.1
2: Fair (%)	21.4	28.6
1: Poor (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	7

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	20.0
3: Good (%)	46.7	40.0
2: Fair (%)	20.0	.
1: Poor (%)	6.7	40.0
Total (N)	15	5

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	50.0	66.7
1: Poor (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	14	9

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	55.6
3: Agree (%)	22.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	44.4
3: Agree (%)	22.2	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.3
3: Agree (%)	17.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	52.9	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.4	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	38.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4
4: Very familiar (%)	76.5	44.4
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	23.5	55.6
Total (N)	17	9

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
3: Fairly well (%)	22.2	22.2
2: Not very well (%)	77.8	55.6
1: Not at all (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
3: Fairly well (%)	33.3	11.1
2: Not very well (%)	66.7	66.7
1: Not at all (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0
4: Very well (%)	11.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	55.6	22.2
2: Not very well (%)	33.3	55.6
1: Not at all (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.2
4: Very well (%)	38.9	.
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	44.4
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	11.1
3: Agree (%)	58.8	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	38.9	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	11.1
3: Good (%)	38.9	22.2
2: Fair (%)	5.6	55.6
1: Poor (%)	16.7	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	33.3	44.4
1: Poor (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
3: Good (%)	53.8	60.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	20.0
Total (N)	13	5

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
3: Good (%)	61.5	80.0
2: Fair (%)	38.5	20.0
Total (N)	13	5

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	80.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	5

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	92.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	40.0
Total (N)	14	5

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	71.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	16.7
Total (N)	14	6

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5
4: Very effective (%)	33.3	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	55.6	50.0
2: Not very effective (%)	.	50.0
1: Not at all effective (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	2

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Very important (%)	50.0	60.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.4	40.0
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	10

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Very important (%)	61.1	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	33.3	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Very important (%)	22.2	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	61.1	37.5
2: Not very important (%)	11.1	12.5
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	8

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	58.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	37.5
Total (N)	18	8

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	.
3: Agree (%)	38.9	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	28.6
Total (N)	18	7

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.8	12.5
3: Agree (%)	35.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.8	.
3: Agree (%)	35.3	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.8	11.1
3: Agree (%)	35.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.7	12.5
3: Agree (%)	29.4	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.6	25.0
3: Agree (%)	36.4	75.0
Total (N)	11	4

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	11.1
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	100.0
Total (N)	8	1

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	33.3
3: Agree (%)	44.4	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	22.2
3: Agree (%)	44.4	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	43.8	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	33.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1	66.7
Total (N)	7	3

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	18.8	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	16	9

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	83.3	.
3: Agree (%)	16.7	100.0
Total (N)	12	5

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	26.7	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	15	9

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	100.0
Total (N)	8	1

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	26.7	62.5
Total (N)	15	8

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	20.0	50.0
Total (N)	15	8

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.0	37.5
3: Agree (%)	20.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	15	8

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	50.0
Total (N)	5	2

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	38.9	22.2
3: Some (%)	44.4	44.4
2: A little (%)	11.1	11.1
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	.
3: Some (%)	18.8	50.0
2: A little (%)	25.0	37.5
1: Not at all (%)	43.8	12.5
Total (N)	16	8

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.9
4: A great deal (%)	44.4	88.9
3: Some (%)	44.4	11.1
2: A little (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.6
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	77.8
3: Some (%)	22.2	11.1
2: A little (%)	33.3	.
1: None (%)	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	11.1	22.2
3: Some (%)	5.6	44.4
2: A little (%)	11.1	22.2
1: None (%)	72.2	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	27.8	22.2
3: Some (%)	33.3	44.4
2: A little (%)	22.2	33.3
1: None (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	18	9

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	5.9	11.1
3: Some (%)	5.9	55.6
2: A little (%)	29.4	11.1
1: None (%)	58.8	22.2
Total (N)	17	9

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	33.3	66.7
2: A little (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	18	9

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	38.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	25.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	75.0
Total (N)	18	8

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	72.2	88.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	11.1
3: Agree (%)	55.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	55.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	12.5	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	77.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	16	9

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	.
3: Agree (%)	46.2	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	.
Total (N)	13	4

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	22.2
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
Frequently (%)	33.3	55.6
Sometimes (%)	50.0	22.2
Seldom (%)	5.6	11.1
Never (%)	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
Frequently (%)	27.8	33.3
Sometimes (%)	44.4	44.4
Seldom (%)	22.2	22.2
Never (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
Frequently (%)	44.4	22.2
Sometimes (%)	38.9	55.6
Seldom (%)	16.7	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
Frequently (%)	50.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	38.9	44.4
Seldom (%)	.	11.1
Never (%)	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
Frequently (%)	11.1	11.1
Sometimes (%)	11.1	22.2
Seldom (%)	27.8	44.4
Never (%)	50.0	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4
Frequently (%)	77.8	55.6
Sometimes (%)	16.7	33.3
Seldom (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
Frequently (%)	61.1	66.7
Sometimes (%)	27.8	11.1
Seldom (%)	5.6	.
Never (%)	5.6	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
Frequently (%)	16.7	22.2
Sometimes (%)	61.1	33.3
Seldom (%)	.	11.1
Never (%)	22.2	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
Frequently (%)	16.7	33.3
Sometimes (%)	50.0	44.4
Seldom (%)	16.7	11.1
Never (%)	16.7	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	52.9	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	8

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	50.0
Total (N)	18	8

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.4	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	8

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	72.2	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	22.2	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	55.6	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.8	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.8	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	33.3
Total (N)	14	9

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	9

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	61.1	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	4	4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	12.5
3: Agree (%)	71.4	87.5
Total (N)	14	8

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	28.6
Total (N)	16	7

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	55.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	9

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	100.0	.
3: Agree (%)	.	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	1	3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	71.4	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	7	7

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	77.8	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	16.7	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	8

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	33.3
Total (N)	14	6

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	52.9	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	42.9
Total (N)	15	7

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	60.0	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	11.1
Total (N)	15	9

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	8

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	44.4
Total (N)	18	9

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	83.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	13	6

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	71.4
Total (N)	11	7

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	20.0
Total (N)	13	5

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	6

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	44.4
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	55.6
Total (N)	18	9

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	87.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	40.0	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	38.9	88.9
No (%)	61.1	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Very helpful (%)	71.4	37.5
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	14.3	50.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	.	12.5
1: Not at all helpful (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	7	8

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	7

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	7

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	41.2	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	17	6

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	20.0
Total (N)	16	5

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	4

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	21.4	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.7	28.6
Total (N)	14	7

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	11.1
3: Agree (%)	44.4	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	88.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	22.2
3: Agree (%)	47.1	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	9

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	15	8

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	28.6
Total (N)	12	7

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	57.1
Total (N)	12	7

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	46.2	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	42.9
Total (N)	13	7

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	41.7	71.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	7

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	16.7
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	6

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Very well (%)	50.0	44.4
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	.	11.1
1: Not at all (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	27.8	22.2
Yes (%)	72.2	77.8
Total (N)	18	9

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	22.2	55.6
Yes (%)	77.8	44.4
Total (N)	18	9

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	33.3	77.8
Yes (%)	66.7	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	94.4	88.9
Yes (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.1
4: Very well (%)	55.6	22.2
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	66.7
2: Not very well (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Very well (%)	66.7	44.4
3: Fairly well (%)	33.3	44.4
2: Not very well (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	.
3: Agree (%)	41.2	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	25.0
Total (N)	17	8

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	12.5
3: Agree (%)	58.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	16	8

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	.
3: Agree (%)	68.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	37.5
Total (N)	16	8

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	66.7
Total (N)	2	6

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	11	7

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	83.3	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	22.2
Total (N)	12	9

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
3: Agree (%)	73.3	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	7

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	14.3
Total (N)	16	7

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	12.5
3: Agree (%)	46.2	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	25.0
Total (N)	13	8

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0
3: Agree (%)	.	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	66.7	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	20.0
Total (N)	3	5

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	63.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	.
Total (N)	11	6

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	76.9	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	37.5
Total (N)	13	8

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	56.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	16	7

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	72.2	33.3
No experience (%)	27.8	66.7
Total (N)	18	9

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	44.4	66.7
Yes (%)	55.6	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	66.7
Yes (%)	50.0	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	88.9	100.0
Yes (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	94.4	100.0
Yes (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	71.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	66.7
Total (N)	14	3

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	64.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	66.7
Total (N)	14	6

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	60.0
Total (N)	15	5

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	60.0
Total (N)	15	5

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	11	3

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	80.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	1.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	.
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	66.7
Total (N)	9	3

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.7	50.0
Total (N)	12	4

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	12.5
3: Agree (%)	55.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	8

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	11.1
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	16	9

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.
3: Agree (%)	20.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	40.0	50.0
Total (N)	15	4

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	9.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	63.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	66.7
Total (N)	11	3

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	.	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	56.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	43.8	40.0
Total (N)	16	5

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.9
4: Very well (%)	22.2	.
3: Fairly well (%)	33.3	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	22.2	22.2
1: Not at all (%)	22.2	44.4
Total (N)	18	9

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.1	11.1
3: Agree (%)	23.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	9

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	66.7
Total (N)	18	9

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	16.7
3: Agree (%)	16.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	16.7
Total (N)	12	6

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	12	5

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	77.8	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	1

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	.
3: Agree (%)	11.8	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	64.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	11.1
3: Agree (%)	70.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	11.1
3: Agree (%)	72.2	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	66.7	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.8	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Very important (%)	72.2	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.2	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Very important (%)	72.2	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.8	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	61.1	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.9	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Very important (%)	55.6	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.9	22.2
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Very important (%)	72.2	55.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.7	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	11.1
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	22.2
3: Agree (%)	55.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	22.2
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	11.1
3: Agree (%)	50.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.2	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	70.6	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5
Total (N)	17	8

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	56.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	43.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	16	6

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	8

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	9

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	66.7	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	66.7
Total (N)	18	9

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	55.6	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	18.8	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	56.3	22.2
Total (N)	16	9

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	18	9

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.5	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	11.1	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	55.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	61.1	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	7	5

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	14.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	71.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	14.3
Total (N)	15	7

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	16	9

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	8

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
3: Satisfied (%)	86.7	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	15	7

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	9

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	15	6

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	8	2

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	3

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: A lot (%)	50.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	22.2	22.2
2: A little (%)	5.6	44.4
1: None at all (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	9

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very likely (%)	44.4	33.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	33.3	55.6
2: Not very likely (%)	16.7	11.1
1: Not at all likely (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	88.9	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	12	5

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	25.0
Total (N)	10	4

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	85.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	7	3

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	12	7

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	92.3	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	13	7

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	1.9
Once a week or more (%)	33.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	5.6	22.2
Once a semester (%)	5.6	.
Once a year (%)	5.6	22.2
Never (%)	50.0	55.6
Total (N)	18	9

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
Once a week or more (%)	5.6	.
A few times a month (%)	11.1	12.5
A few times a semester (%)	11.1	12.5
Once a semester (%)	16.7	12.5
Never (%)	55.6	62.5
Total (N)	18	8

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.2	1.2
Once a semester (%)	11.1	11.1
Never (%)	88.9	88.9
Total (N)	18	9

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8
A few times a month (%)	5.6	.
A few times a semester (%)	11.1	44.4
Once a semester (%)	22.2	.
Once a year (%)	22.2	44.4
Never (%)	38.9	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
A few times a month (%)	5.6	11.1
A few times a semester (%)	27.8	44.4
Once a semester (%)	16.7	11.1
Once a year (%)	27.8	11.1
Never (%)	22.2	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	38.9	11.1
3: Some (%)	22.2	55.6
2: A little (%)	22.2	.
1: None at all (%)	16.7	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Very likely (%)	61.1	55.6
3: Somewhat likely (%)	22.2	44.4
2: Not very likely (%)	11.1	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	54.2	57.9
more than 60 hrs (%)	5.6	22.2
51 to 60 hrs (%)	55.6	44.4
41 to 50 hrs (%)	27.8	33.3
40 hrs or less (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	36.8	42.2
more than 50% of time (%)	5.6	44.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	88.9	22.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.6	11.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	11.1
0% of time (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	5.6	12.5
Yes (%)	94.4	87.5
Total (N)	18	8

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	38.9	50.0
Yes (%)	61.1	50.0
Total (N)	18	8

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	11.1	25.0
Yes (%)	88.9	75.0
Total (N)	18	8

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	72.2	75.0
Yes (%)	27.8	25.0
Total (N)	18	8

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	11.1	12.5
Yes (%)	88.9	87.5
Total (N)	18	8

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.2	7.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.6	11.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	27.8	33.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	61.1	44.4
0% of time (%)	5.6	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	23.5	37.5
Yes (%)	76.5	62.5
Total (N)	17	8

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	23.5	12.5
Yes (%)	76.5	87.5
Total (N)	17	8

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	31.3	25.0
more than 50% of time (%)	.	11.1
26% to 50% of time (%)	77.8	22.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	11.1	33.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.6	22.2
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.6	.
0% of time (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.8	1.4
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.6	33.3
0% of time (%)	88.9	66.7
Total (N)	18	9

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.4	3.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	22.2	22.2
1% to 5% of time (%)	22.2	33.3
0% of time (%)	55.6	44.4
Total (N)	18	9

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	37.5	60.0
Yes (%)	62.5	40.0
Total (N)	8	5

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	60.0
Yes (%)	50.0	40.0
Total (N)	8	5

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	75.0	60.0
Yes (%)	25.0	40.0
Total (N)	8	5

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	50.0	40.0
Yes (%)	50.0	60.0
Total (N)	8	5

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	87.5	100.0
Yes (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	8	5

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	12.4	6.9
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.6	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	22.2	11.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	55.6	33.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.1	33.3
0% of time (%)	5.6	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	70.6	57.1
Yes (%)	29.4	42.9
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	29.4	28.6
Yes (%)	70.6	71.4
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	41.2	42.9
Yes (%)	58.8	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	52.9	71.4
Yes (%)	47.1	28.6
Total (N)	17	7

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	58.8	42.9
Yes (%)	41.2	57.1
Total (N)	17	7

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.7	2.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.6	11.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	27.8	33.3
0% of time (%)	66.7	55.6
Total (N)	18	9

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.3	0.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.6	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	16.7	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	16.7	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.6	.
0% of time (%)	55.6	100.0
Total (N)	18	9

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	11.1	11.1
Yes (%)	88.9	88.9
Total (N)	18	9

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	77.8	88.9
Yes (%)	22.2	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	61.1	66.7
Yes (%)	38.9	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	88.9	100.0
Yes (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	11.1	77.8
Yes (%)	88.9	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	61.1	55.6
Yes (%)	38.9	44.4
Total (N)	18	9

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	94.4	100.0
Yes (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	5.9	11.1
A few times (%)	35.3	55.6
About once per month (%)	29.4	22.2
Two or three times per month (%)	17.6	11.1
At least once per week (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	17	9

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	82.4	44.4
Once or twice (%)	5.9	44.4
Three to five times (%)	11.8	11.1
Total (N)	17	9

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	22.2	.
2 (%)	16.7	22.2
3 (%)	38.9	22.2
4 (%)	22.2	22.2
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	58.8	66.7
I would not change a thing (%)	41.2	33.3
Total (N)	17	9

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	27.8	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	11.1
3: Agree (%)	33.3	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	38.9	66.7
Total (N)	18	9

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	44.4
3: Agree (%)	22.2	55.6
Total (N)	18	9

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	22.2
3: Agree (%)	38.9	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.9	44.4
3: Agree (%)	41.2	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	9

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	27.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.8
4: A great deal (%)	29.4	75.0
3: Some (%)	35.3	25.0
2: A little (%)	5.9	.
1: None at all (%)	29.4	.
Total (N)	17	8

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.9
4: A great deal (%)	27.8	88.9
3: Some (%)	38.9	11.1
2: A little (%)	5.6	.
1: None at all (%)	27.8	.
Total (N)	18	9

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	.	33.3
3: Some (%)	17.6	66.7
2: A little (%)	23.5	.
1: None at all (%)	58.8	.
Total (N)	17	9

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	11.8	25.0
3: Some (%)	35.3	62.5
2: A little (%)	23.5	12.5
1: None at all (%)	29.4	.
Total (N)	17	8

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.5
4: A great deal (%)	27.8	50.0
3: Some (%)	27.8	50.0
2: A little (%)	33.3	.
1: None at all (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	8

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	5.6	22.2
3: Some (%)	16.7	44.4
2: A little (%)	11.1	22.2
1: None at all (%)	66.7	11.1
Total (N)	18	9

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	5.6	22.2
3: Some (%)	27.8	66.7
2: A little (%)	38.9	11.1
1: None at all (%)	27.8	.
Total (N)	18	9

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	11.1	37.5
3: Some (%)	16.7	25.0
2: A little (%)	27.8	25.0
1: None at all (%)	44.4	12.5
Total (N)	18	8

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	.	11.1
3: Some (%)	27.8	44.4
2: A little (%)	44.4	22.2
1: None at all (%)	27.8	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	27.8	66.7
3: Some (%)	27.8	33.3
2: A little (%)	22.2	.
1: None at all (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	9

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	66.7
3: Some (%)	38.9	33.3
2: A little (%)	33.3	.
1: None at all (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	9

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	.
3: Some (%)	27.8	62.5
2: A little (%)	33.3	12.5
1: None at all (%)	22.2	25.0
Total (N)	18	8

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	5.6	25.0
3: Some (%)	27.8	50.0
2: A little (%)	38.9	.
1: None at all (%)	27.8	25.0
Total (N)	18	8

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	.
3: Some (%)	37.5	62.5
2: A little (%)	37.5	12.5
1: None at all (%)	12.5	25.0
Total (N)	16	8

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.4	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	9

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7
A lot more satisfied now (%)	11.1	.
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	44.4	44.4
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	11.1	11.1
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	33.3	11.1
A lot less satisfied now (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	50.0	22.2
Yes - not very seriously (%)	11.1	33.3
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	27.8	11.1
Yes - very seriously (%)	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	18	9

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	55.6	22.2
Yes - not very seriously (%)	27.8	33.3
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	16.7	22.2
Yes - very seriously (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	18	9

Back to top

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

Return to COT Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page