North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Management
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	84.2	78.6	84.6	40.0
..... Yes (%)	15.8	21.4	15.4	60.0
Total (N)	19	14	13	10

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	14.3	46.2	30.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	38.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	28.6	7.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	7.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	18	14	13	10

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	8.3	15.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	36.8	58.3	46.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.1	25.0	30.8	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	8.3	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	12	13	10

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	16.7	25.0	10.0
3: Agree (%)	68.4	66.7	25.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	8.3	25.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	8.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	19	12	12	10

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5	3.4	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	.	.	16.7	.
4: Strong (%)	26.3	58.3	33.3	50.0
3: Average (%)	57.9	33.3	33.3	50.0
2: Weak (%)	15.8	8.3	8.3	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	19	12	12	10

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.7	3.5	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	.	7.7	15.4	.
4: Strong (%)	38.9	61.5	30.8	50.0
3: Average (%)	44.4	23.1	46.2	50.0
2: Weak (%)	16.7	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	18	13	13	10

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.3	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	.	.	7.7	.
4: Strong (%)	15.8	30.8	30.8	40.0
3: Average (%)	57.9	61.5	46.2	60.0
2: Weak (%)	26.3	7.7	15.4	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.5	3.0
4: Strong (%)	.	25.0	50.0	.
3: Average (%)	75.0	25.0	50.0	100.0
2: Weak (%)	25.0	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	2	1

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.6	3.6
5: Very strong (%)	6.7	30.8	.	.
4: Strong (%)	40.0	23.1	85.7	60.0
3: Average (%)	40.0	38.5	.	40.0
2: Weak (%)	6.7	7.7	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	6.7	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	15	13	7	5

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.7	3.3	3.1
5: Very strong (%)	5.9	15.4	12.5	.
4: Strong (%)	35.3	46.2	25.0	12.5
3: Average (%)	41.2	30.8	50.0	87.5
2: Weak (%)	11.8	7.7	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	5.9	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	17	13	8	8

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.0	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	.	9.1	.	.
4: Strong (%)	33.3	18.2	50.0	37.5
3: Average (%)	60.0	45.5	20.0	62.5
2: Weak (%)	6.7	27.3	10.0	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	15	11	10	8

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.8	3.7	4.0
A (%)	.	7.7	.	.
B (%)	89.5	69.2	75.0	100.0
C (%)	10.5	23.1	16.7	.
D (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	19	13	12	10

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.1	4.2	4.1	4.3
A (%)	22.2	38.5	30.8	30.0
B (%)	66.7	46.2	53.8	70.0
C (%)	11.1	15.4	7.7	.
D (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	18	13	13	10

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	4.2	4.0	4.4
A (%)	10.5	30.8	30.8	40.0
B (%)	73.7	61.5	46.2	60.0
C (%)	15.8	7.7	15.4	.
D (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0	3.9	4.3
A (%)	10.5	23.1	30.8	40.0
B (%)	63.2	53.8	38.5	50.0
C (%)	26.3	23.1	23.1	10.0
D (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.5	4.2	4.4
A (%)	21.1	53.8	30.8	44.4
B (%)	78.9	46.2	61.5	55.6
C (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	9

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.5	4.3	4.6
A (%)	21.1	53.8	38.5	55.6
B (%)	73.7	38.5	53.8	44.4
C (%)	5.3	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	9

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	10.5	46.2	38.5	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	36.8	23.1	46.2	40.0
No clear vision (%)	47.4	30.8	15.4	10.0
Not familiar (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	33.3	45.5	44.4
3: Agree (%)	88.9	66.7	45.5	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	9	9	11	9

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	15.8	30.8	46.2	50.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	68.4	38.5	30.8	30.0
No clear vision (%)	15.8	30.8	23.1	10.0
Not familiar (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	68.4	61.5	30.8	40.0
Change for the worse (%)	15.8	7.7	30.8	30.0
Not really change (%)	15.8	30.8	38.5	30.0
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	68.4	50.0	23.1	60.0
Change for the worse (%)	5.3	8.3	46.2	10.0
Not really change (%)	26.3	41.7	30.8	30.0
Total (N)	19	12	13	10

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	47.4	30.8	15.4	60.0
Change for the worse (%)	.	.	23.1	.
Not really change (%)	52.6	69.2	61.5	40.0
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.3	16.7	46.2	50.0
3: Good (%)	52.6	33.3	30.8	20.0
2: Fair (%)	31.6	25.0	15.4	30.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	25.0	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	12	13	10

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.1	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	33.3	46.2	70.0
3: Good (%)	57.9	25.0	23.1	30.0
2: Fair (%)	10.5	33.3	23.1	.
1: Poor (%)	21.1	8.3	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	12	13	10

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	3.1	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	25.0	46.2	70.0
3: Good (%)	52.6	25.0	23.1	30.0
2: Fair (%)	15.8	41.7	23.1	.
1: Poor (%)	21.1	8.3	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	12	13	10

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.9	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.8	8.3	30.8	70.0
3: Good (%)	52.6	66.7	46.2	20.0
2: Fair (%)	15.8	8.3	7.7	10.0
1: Poor (%)	15.8	16.7	15.4	.
Total (N)	19	12	13	10

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2	3.2	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	26.3	41.7	41.7	60.0
3: Good (%)	52.6	41.7	41.7	40.0
2: Fair (%)	.	8.3	8.3	.
1: Poor (%)	21.1	8.3	8.3	.
Total (N)	19	12	12	10

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	.	33.3	22.2
3: Good (%)	26.3	50.0	33.3	44.4
2: Fair (%)	36.8	25.0	25.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	26.3	25.0	8.3	.
Total (N)	19	12	12	9

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	33.3	23.1	30.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	.	46.2	60.0
2: Fair (%)	33.3	50.0	7.7	.
1: Poor (%)	16.7	16.7	23.1	10.0
Total (N)	18	12	13	10

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	9.1	30.8	30.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	18.2	38.5	60.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	27.3	23.1	10.0
1: Poor (%)	27.8	45.5	7.7	.
Total (N)	18	11	13	10

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	.	22.2
3: Good (%)	47.4	33.3	69.2	66.7
2: Fair (%)	42.1	41.7	15.4	11.1
1: Poor (%)	10.5	25.0	15.4	.
Total (N)	19	12	13	9

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	.	8.3	25.0	22.2
3: Good (%)	52.6	33.3	50.0	66.7
2: Fair (%)	21.1	33.3	16.7	.
1: Poor (%)	26.3	25.0	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	19	12	12	9

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	50.0	33.3	30.0
3: Good (%)	55.6	25.0	41.7	60.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	25.0	16.7	.
1: Poor (%)	11.1	.	8.3	10.0
Total (N)	18	12	12	10

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.3	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	31.6	60.0	50.0	70.0
3: Good (%)	47.4	20.0	41.7	20.0
2: Fair (%)	10.5	10.0	.	10.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	10.0	8.3	.
Total (N)	19	10	12	10

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	3.2	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	18.2	41.7	60.0
3: Good (%)	47.4	36.4	41.7	30.0
2: Fair (%)	31.6	36.4	8.3	.
1: Poor (%)	10.5	9.1	8.3	10.0
Total (N)	19	11	12	10

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.3	8.3	27.3	44.4
3: Good (%)	52.6	25.0	54.5	44.4
2: Fair (%)	10.5	50.0	9.1	.
1: Poor (%)	31.6	16.7	9.1	11.1
Total (N)	19	12	11	9

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9	3.4	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	27.3	54.5	37.5
3: Good (%)	37.5	45.5	36.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	37.5	18.2	.	12.5
1: Poor (%)	18.8	9.1	9.1	.
Total (N)	16	11	11	8

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	.	7.7	15.4	10.0
3: Good (%)	68.4	46.2	46.2	60.0
2: Fair (%)	21.1	38.5	30.8	20.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	7.7	7.7	10.0
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.8	15.4	30.8	11.1
3: Good (%)	52.6	46.2	30.8	44.4
2: Fair (%)	15.8	23.1	30.8	33.3
1: Poor (%)	15.8	15.4	7.7	11.1
Total (N)	19	13	13	9

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	15.4	15.4	11.1
3: Good (%)	36.8	38.5	38.5	22.2
2: Fair (%)	36.8	38.5	7.7	66.7
1: Poor (%)	15.8	7.7	38.5	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	9

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	15.8	15.4	16.7	10.0
3: Good (%)	42.1	61.5	25.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	26.3	15.4	33.3	40.0
1: Poor (%)	15.8	7.7	25.0	.
Total (N)	19	13	12	10

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	.	15.4	30.8	11.1
3: Good (%)	47.4	38.5	38.5	44.4
2: Fair (%)	36.8	38.5	23.1	44.4
1: Poor (%)	15.8	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	9

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4	2.6	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	.	7.7	16.7	11.1
3: Good (%)	33.3	38.5	50.0	22.2
2: Fair (%)	38.9	38.5	8.3	44.4
1: Poor (%)	27.8	15.4	25.0	22.2
Total (N)	18	13	12	9

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.2	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	.	8.3	10.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	43.8	25.0	30.0	22.2
2: Fair (%)	31.3	41.7	30.0	44.4
1: Poor (%)	25.0	25.0	30.0	22.2
Total (N)	16	12	10	9

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	1.9	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	.	10.0
3: Good (%)	57.9	23.1	46.2	20.0
2: Fair (%)	36.8	46.2	30.8	70.0
1: Poor (%)	5.3	30.8	23.1	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	.	.	11.1
3: Good (%)	44.4	38.5	54.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	38.9	23.1	27.3	44.4
1: Poor (%)	11.1	38.5	18.2	11.1
Total (N)	18	13	11	9

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	36.4	20.0	12.5
3: Good (%)	70.6	54.5	50.0	62.5
2: Fair (%)	11.8	.	.	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.8	9.1	30.0	.
Total (N)	17	11	10	8

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	36.4	44.4	22.2
3: Good (%)	78.9	54.5	33.3	77.8
2: Fair (%)	10.5	.	11.1	.
1: Poor (%)	.	9.1	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	11	9	9

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	.	7.7	25.0	11.1
3: Good (%)	70.6	53.8	50.0	66.7
2: Fair (%)	17.6	23.1	8.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	11.8	15.4	16.7	11.1
Total (N)	17	13	12	9

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	18.2	12.5
3: Good (%)	64.7	41.7	36.4	37.5
2: Fair (%)	17.6	41.7	36.4	50.0
1: Poor (%)	17.6	16.7	9.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	11	8

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	.	40.0	36.4	37.5
3: Good (%)	60.0	20.0	45.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	26.7	40.0	9.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	13.3	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	15	10	11	8

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	8.3	11.1
3: Good (%)	64.7	16.7	33.3	22.2
2: Fair (%)	17.6	50.0	41.7	66.7
1: Poor (%)	17.6	33.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	17	12	12	9

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9	1.9	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	.	16.7
3: Good (%)	46.2	20.0	30.0	16.7
2: Fair (%)	46.2	50.0	30.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	30.0	40.0	16.7
Total (N)	13	10	10	6

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	.	10.0	9.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	66.7	40.0	36.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	6.7	30.0	27.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	26.7	20.0	27.3	12.5
Total (N)	15	10	11	8

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	14.3	11.1	11.1
3: Good (%)	46.2	42.9	55.6	55.6
2: Fair (%)	30.8	14.3	11.1	33.3
1: Poor (%)	7.7	28.6	22.2	.
Total (N)	13	7	9	9

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	18.2	.	22.2
3: Good (%)	88.2	72.7	66.7	55.6
2: Fair (%)	5.9	.	25.0	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	9.1	8.3	11.1
Total (N)	17	11	12	9

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	9.1	14.3
3: Good (%)	80.0	42.9	54.5	42.9
2: Fair (%)	20.0	42.9	18.2	28.6
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3	18.2	14.3
Total (N)	15	7	11	7

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	.	14.3
3: Good (%)	80.0	42.9	50.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	13.3	42.9	30.0	14.3
1: Poor (%)	6.7	14.3	20.0	28.6
Total (N)	15	7	10	7

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.5	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	.	40.0	9.1	37.5
3: Good (%)	69.2	30.0	54.5	37.5
2: Fair (%)	30.8	20.0	18.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	.	10.0	18.2	.
Total (N)	13	10	11	8

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	53.8	46.2	50.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	38.5	46.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	7.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.2	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	23.1	46.2	66.7
3: Agree (%)	57.9	69.2	38.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	.	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	9

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.3	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	46.2	53.8	80.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	38.5	30.8	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	15.4	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.2	2.9	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	30.8	15.4	50.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	61.5	69.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	7.7	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.1	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	16.7	.	10.0
3: Agree (%)	26.3	25.0	46.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	47.4	41.7	30.8	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.1	16.7	23.1	.
Total (N)	19	12	13	10

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	3.2	3.3	3.1
4: Very familiar (%)	5.6	23.1	46.2	30.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	50.0	76.9	38.5	50.0
2: Not very familiar (%)	22.2	.	15.4	20.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	22.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	13	13	10

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.4	2.5	2.6
4: Very well (%)	.	7.7	15.4	10.0
3: Fairly well (%)	15.8	38.5	46.2	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	52.6	38.5	15.4	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	31.6	15.4	23.1	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.5	2.4	2.7
4: Very well (%)	.	.	15.4	10.0
3: Fairly well (%)	10.5	46.2	30.8	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	63.2	53.8	30.8	40.0
1: Not at all (%)	26.3	.	23.1	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.7	2.7
4: Very well (%)	5.3	.	15.4	10.0
3: Fairly well (%)	42.1	53.8	53.8	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	31.6	46.2	15.4	40.0
1: Not at all (%)	21.1	.	15.4	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	3.3	3.5
4: Very well (%)	5.3	15.4	46.2	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	57.9	46.2	38.5	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	21.1	30.8	15.4	.
1: Not at all (%)	15.8	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	30.8	20.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	30.8	46.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.1	53.8	15.4	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	15.4	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	46.2	53.8	70.0
3: Agree (%)	68.4	46.2	30.8	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.4	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	31.6	23.1	66.7	50.0
3: Good (%)	31.6	53.8	16.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	15.8	15.4	8.3	.
1: Poor (%)	21.1	7.7	8.3	.
Total (N)	19	13	12	10

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	.	15.4	10.0
3: Good (%)	52.6	76.9	23.1	40.0
2: Fair (%)	26.3	23.1	23.1	40.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	.	38.5	10.0
Total (N)	19	13	13	10

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	11.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	55.6	62.5	33.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	44.4	25.0	33.3	37.5
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5	22.2	.
Total (N)	9	8	9	8

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	.	.	.	12.5
3: Good (%)	75.0	40.0	42.9	37.5
2: Fair (%)	25.0	60.0	42.9	50.0
1: Poor (%)	.	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	8	5	7	8

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1	2.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	11.1	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	83.3	33.3	60.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	11.1	10.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	44.4	30.0	12.5
Total (N)	6	9	10	8

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	12.5	10.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	100.0	37.5	30.0	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	30.0	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	37.5	30.0	.
Total (N)	5	8	10	9

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	10.0	11.1	11.1
3: Agree (%)	80.0	20.0	22.2	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	30.0	33.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	40.0	33.3	11.1
Total (N)	5	10	9	9

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.7	3.4
4: Very effective (%)	.	25.0	28.6	37.5
3: Somewhat effective (%)	100.0	25.0	28.6	62.5
2: Not very effective (%)	.	50.0	28.6	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	.	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	3	4	7	8

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	3.3	3.0
4: Very important (%)	52.6	53.8	41.7	30.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	42.1	15.4	41.7	40.0
2: Not very important (%)	5.3	23.1	16.7	30.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	19	13	12	10

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.7	3.0
4: Very important (%)	47.1	23.1	15.4	30.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.4	53.8	53.8	40.0
2: Not very important (%)	5.9	7.7	15.4	30.0
1: Not at all important (%)	17.6	15.4	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.2	2.4
4: Very important (%)	23.5	30.8	7.7	10.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	47.1	38.5	30.8	40.0
2: Not very important (%)	11.8	23.1	30.8	30.0
1: Not at all important (%)	17.6	7.7	30.8	20.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	7.7	18.2	30.0
3: Agree (%)	64.3	69.2	81.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	15.4	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	14	13	11	10

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	30.8	22.2	12.5
3: Agree (%)	37.5	46.2	66.7	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	7.7	.	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	15.4	11.1	.
Total (N)	8	13	9	8

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	25.0	22.2	12.5
3: Agree (%)	42.9	58.3	55.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	8.3	.	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	22.2	.
Total (N)	7	12	9	8

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	45.5	25.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	62.5	36.4	50.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	9.1	.	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	25.0	.
Total (N)	8	11	8	8

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	30.8	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	33.3	53.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	8.3	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	15.4	.
Total (N)	8	12	13	10

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	50.0	41.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	41.7	41.7	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	9	12	12	10

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	58.3	45.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	57.1	25.0	36.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	8.3	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	18.2	.
Total (N)	7	12	11	10

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	58.3	53.8	60.0
3: Agree (%)	78.6	41.7	30.8	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	15.4	.
Total (N)	14	12	13	10

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.2	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	66.7	60.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	44.4	33.3	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	9	9	10	9

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	53.8	50.0	70.0
3: Agree (%)	42.9	30.8	40.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	15.4	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	14	13	10	10

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6	3.2	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	62.5	60.0	77.8
3: Agree (%)	80.0	37.5	20.0	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	5	8	5	9

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	58.3	50.0	70.0
3: Agree (%)	61.5	41.7	41.7	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	13	12	12	10

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5	3.3	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.1	61.5	50.0	70.0
3: Agree (%)	53.8	30.8	41.7	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	7.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	13	13	12	10

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6	3.2	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	61.5	54.5	70.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	38.5	27.3	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	18.2	.
Total (N)	8	13	11	10

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	50.0	40.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	50.0	40.0	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	11.1
Total (N)	5	10	5	9

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	75.0	69.2	50.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	25.0	23.1	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	14	12	13	10

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	77.8	66.7	77.8
3: Agree (%)	66.7	22.2	22.2	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	12	9	9	9

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	75.0	66.7	70.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	25.0	25.0	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	14	12	12	10

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	62.5	71.4	77.8
3: Agree (%)	75.0	37.5	14.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	8	8	7	9

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	75.0	69.2	70.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	25.0	23.1	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	14	12	13	10

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	75.0	69.2	70.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	25.0	23.1	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	14	12	13	10

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	75.0	75.0	70.0
3: Agree (%)	69.2	25.0	16.7	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	13	12	12	10

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.7	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	66.7	71.4	77.8
3: Agree (%)	75.0	33.3	14.3	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	.	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	8	9	7	9

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.5	2.3	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	.	15.4	.	.
3: Some (%)	33.3	46.2	50.0	40.0
2: A little (%)	13.3	15.4	25.0	40.0
1: Not at all (%)	53.3	23.1	25.0	20.0
Total (N)	15	13	12	10

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2	1.8	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	6.7	7.7	.	10.0
3: Some (%)	13.3	38.5	23.1	20.0
2: A little (%)	33.3	23.1	30.8	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	46.7	30.8	46.2	20.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	3.2	3.0	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	61.5	38.5	10.0
3: Some (%)	25.0	15.4	30.8	40.0
2: A little (%)	12.5	7.7	23.1	40.0
1: None (%)	37.5	15.4	7.7	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.4	2.6	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	69.2	30.8	10.0
3: Some (%)	50.0	15.4	23.1	50.0
2: A little (%)	12.5	.	23.1	20.0
1: None (%)	18.8	15.4	23.1	20.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2	1.4	1.2
4: A great deal (%)	.	7.7	7.7	.
3: Some (%)	25.0	38.5	.	.
2: A little (%)	31.3	15.4	15.4	20.0
1: None (%)	43.8	38.5	76.9	80.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.5	1.8	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	6.3	15.4	15.4	.
3: Some (%)	25.0	38.5	.	20.0
2: A little (%)	25.0	23.1	38.5	20.0
1: None (%)	43.8	23.1	46.2	60.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2	1.5	1.5
4: A great deal (%)	6.3	7.7	7.7	.
3: Some (%)	25.0	38.5	.	10.0
2: A little (%)	6.3	15.4	23.1	30.0
1: None (%)	62.5	38.5	69.2	60.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.6	2.2	2.2	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	6.7	7.7	15.4	.
3: Some (%)	13.3	30.8	15.4	20.0
2: A little (%)	13.3	38.5	38.5	50.0
1: None (%)	66.7	23.1	30.8	30.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	7.7	53.8	40.0
3: Agree (%)	41.2	69.2	30.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	15.4	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.6	7.7	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.7	46.2	38.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	35.3	53.8	61.5	50.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.5	15.4	15.4	30.0
3: Agree (%)	58.8	53.8	76.9	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	23.1	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	7.7	30.8	40.0
3: Agree (%)	58.8	76.9	53.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	15.4	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.	15.4	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	53.3	58.3	38.5	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	41.7	30.8	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	.	30.8	11.1
Total (N)	15	12	13	9

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	14.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	37.5	50.0	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	62.5	10.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	40.0	14.3
Total (N)	11	8	10	7

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.5	15.4	38.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	52.9	84.6	46.2	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	.	7.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.1	2.9
Frequently (%)	11.8	23.1	38.5	40.0
Sometimes (%)	70.6	53.8	38.5	20.0
Seldom (%)	5.9	23.1	15.4	30.0
Never (%)	11.8	.	7.7	10.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.3
Frequently (%)	35.3	46.2	46.2	50.0
Sometimes (%)	47.1	23.1	30.8	40.0
Seldom (%)	11.8	23.1	7.7	.
Never (%)	5.9	7.7	15.4	10.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5	3.3	3.3
Frequently (%)	23.5	61.5	41.7	44.4
Sometimes (%)	58.8	30.8	41.7	44.4
Seldom (%)	17.6	7.7	16.7	11.1
Total (N)	17	13	12	9

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	2.6	3.3
Frequently (%)	23.5	46.2	33.3	40.0
Sometimes (%)	52.9	38.5	8.3	50.0
Seldom (%)	17.6	7.7	41.7	10.0
Never (%)	5.9	7.7	16.7	.
Total (N)	17	13	12	10

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	2.4	1.8	2.2
Frequently (%)	5.9	15.4	.	11.1
Sometimes (%)	17.6	30.8	16.7	33.3
Seldom (%)	29.4	30.8	50.0	22.2
Never (%)	47.1	23.1	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	17	13	12	9

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.0	3.4
Frequently (%)	23.5	46.2	38.5	50.0
Sometimes (%)	52.9	30.8	30.8	40.0
Seldom (%)	11.8	23.1	23.1	10.0
Never (%)	11.8	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.5	2.6
Frequently (%)	23.5	23.1	15.4	20.0
Sometimes (%)	23.5	15.4	30.8	30.0
Seldom (%)	11.8	30.8	38.5	40.0
Never (%)	41.2	30.8	15.4	10.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	2.4	2.9
Frequently (%)	52.9	38.5	15.4	10.0
Sometimes (%)	35.3	38.5	38.5	80.0
Seldom (%)	5.9	15.4	15.4	.
Never (%)	5.9	7.7	30.8	10.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5	2.1	2.1
Frequently (%)	5.9	15.4	15.4	10.0
Sometimes (%)	47.1	46.2	15.4	20.0
Seldom (%)	11.8	15.4	30.8	40.0
Never (%)	35.3	23.1	38.5	30.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8	3.5	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	56.3	76.9	69.2	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	23.1	23.1	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.2	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	38.5	38.5	70.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	38.5	46.2	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	15.4	7.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6	3.2	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	69.2	46.2	90.0
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	23.1	38.5	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	7.7	7.7	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9	3.4	3.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	68.8	92.3	46.2	90.0
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	7.7	46.2	10.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.7	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.3	23.1	23.1	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	38.5	30.8	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	30.8	38.5	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	8.3	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	66.7	58.3	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	25.0	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	15	12	12	10

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	7.7	22.2	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	76.9	55.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	15.4	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	16	13	9	9

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	11.1	16.7	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	33.3	25.0	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	11.1	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	44.4	25.0	22.2
Total (N)	15	9	12	9

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	1.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	12.5	11.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	15.4	25.0	22.2	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	12.5	11.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	46.2	50.0	55.6	12.5
Total (N)	13	8	9	8

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	30.8	30.8	30.0
3: Agree (%)	70.6	61.5	46.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	7.7	15.4	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	9.1	30.8	30.0
3: Agree (%)	62.5	45.5	46.2	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	36.4	15.4	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	11	13	10

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.5	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	50.0	25.0
Total (N)	3	2	2	4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	20.0	28.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	55.6	60.0	42.9	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	9	10	7	7

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	7.7	7.7	10.0
3: Agree (%)	53.3	53.8	53.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	38.5	23.1	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	26.7	.	15.4	20.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.3	23.1	23.1	60.0
3: Agree (%)	46.7	69.2	61.5	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	.	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	26.7	7.7	7.7	10.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	33.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	66.7	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	.	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	3	3	3	3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.9	.	25.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	14.3	44.4	37.5	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	44.4	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	42.9	11.1	25.0	14.3
Total (N)	7	9	8	7

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	47.1	38.5	23.1	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	53.8	61.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	7.7	15.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.5	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	7.7	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	18.2	53.8	66.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	23.1	22.2	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	45.5	15.4	11.1	.
Total (N)	11	13	9	8

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	27.3	20.0	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	63.6	70.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	9.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	12	11	10	8

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.4	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	.	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	30.0	60.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	50.0	20.0	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	20.0	20.0	11.1
Total (N)	10	10	10	9

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	2.5	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.4	8.3	8.3	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	64.3	58.3	58.3	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	8.3	8.3	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	25.0	.
Total (N)	14	12	12	10

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.8	20.0	16.7	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	70.0	66.7	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0	8.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	13	10	12	9

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2	2.4	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	.	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	41.7	60.0	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	33.3	20.0	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	25.0	20.0	11.1
Total (N)	14	12	10	9

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4	2.4	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	9.1	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	30.0	54.5	55.6	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	.	33.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	36.4	11.1	25.0
Total (N)	10	11	9	8

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.1	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	10.0	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	30.0	33.3	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	20.0	44.4	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	37.5	40.0	22.2	33.3
Total (N)	8	10	9	9

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	60.0	83.3	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	30.0	16.7	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	8	10	6	5

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	30.0	66.7	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	60.0	11.1	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	10.0	11.1	14.3
Total (N)	9	10	9	7

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.4	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.3	38.5	41.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	46.2	58.3	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	7.7	.	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	17	13	12	10

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	9.1	22.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	72.7	66.7	90.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	9.1	.	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.6	9.1	11.1	.
Total (N)	17	11	9	10

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	11.1	.	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	44.4	100.0	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	11.1	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	8	9	6	7

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	11.8	.	.	.
No (%)	88.2	100.0	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	17	12	13	10

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer
Mean Rating	3.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	100.0
Total (N)	2

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	1.6	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	25.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	12.5	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	62.5	.	.
Total (N)	7	8	1	6

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	1.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	20.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	60.0	.
Total (N)	6	5	5

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	28.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	42.9	.
Total (N)	6	7	4

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	60.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	4	5	4

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	1.6	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	14.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	71.4	.
Total (N)	4	7	3

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	1.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	14.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	57.1	.
Total (N)	4	7	3

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	1.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	14.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	71.4	.
Total (N)	4	7	2

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	30.8	38.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	58.8	38.5	46.2	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	23.1	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.6	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	38.5	53.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	52.9	53.8	30.8	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	7.7	7.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.6	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	36.4	27.3	44.4
3: Agree (%)	57.1	27.3	63.6	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	36.4	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.4	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	14	11	11	9

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	40.0	40.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	90.0	60.0	60.0	66.7
Total (N)	10	10	10	9

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	18.2	44.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	54.5	33.3	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	18.2	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	9.1	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	11	11	9	9

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	7.7	25.0	10.0
3: Agree (%)	61.5	53.8	33.3	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	23.1	16.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.1	15.4	25.0	10.0
Total (N)	13	13	12	10

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	7.7	25.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	76.9	61.5	50.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	15.4	8.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	15.4	16.7	.
Total (N)	13	13	12	10

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	16.7	25.0	11.1
3: Agree (%)	46.2	16.7	41.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	50.0	8.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.8	16.7	25.0	.
Total (N)	13	12	12	9

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	7.7	33.3	10.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	38.5	58.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	46.2	.	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	7.7	8.3	.
Total (N)	12	13	12	10

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.1	3.2
4: Very well (%)	6.3	23.1	38.5	30.0
3: Fairly well (%)	43.8	46.2	38.5	60.0
2: Not very well (%)	50.0	23.1	15.4	10.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	7.7	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	47.1	15.4	38.5	40.0
Yes (%)	52.9	84.6	61.5	60.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	88.2	7.7	30.8	20.0
Yes (%)	11.8	92.3	69.2	80.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	7.7	38.5	30.0
Yes (%)	.	92.3	61.5	70.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	58.8	92.3	69.2	90.0
Yes (%)	41.2	7.7	30.8	10.0
Total (N)	17	13	13	10

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5	3.3	3.7
4: Very well (%)	18.8	46.2	61.5	70.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	53.8	15.4	30.0
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	.	15.4	.
1: Not at all (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4	3.2	3.6
4: Very well (%)	12.5	38.5	53.8	60.0
3: Fairly well (%)	56.3	61.5	15.4	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	.	23.1	.
1: Not at all (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.6	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	16.7	54.5	66.7
3: Agree (%)	23.1	50.0	27.3	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	38.5	8.3	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.8	25.0	18.2	.
Total (N)	13	12	11	9

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.9	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	25.0	60.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	18.2	50.0	20.0	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	16.7	10.0	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	8.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	11	12	10	9

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	9.1	7.7	.
3: Agree (%)	71.4	27.3	69.2	90.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	63.6	15.4	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	14	11	13	10

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	10.0	.	10.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	60.0	54.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	20.0	27.3	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	10.0	18.2	.
Total (N)	10	10	11	10

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.0	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	100.0	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	3	1	2	2

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.	16.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	41.7	83.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	41.7	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	9	12	6	5

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	62.5	62.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	25.0	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	12.5	12.5	.
Total (N)	7	8	8	4

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	.	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	60.0	40.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	30.0	20.0	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	30.0	.
Total (N)	9	10	10	9

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	15.4	23.1	10.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	46.2	61.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	38.5	7.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.	7.7	10.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	27.3	18.2	33.3
3: Agree (%)	42.9	45.5	63.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	27.3	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	28.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	7	11	11	9

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.0	2.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	50.0
3: Agree (%)	100.0	33.3	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	1	3	2	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	10.0	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.0	85.7	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	40.0	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	8	10	7	5

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	2.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	11.1	.	14.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	22.2	57.1	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	33.3	14.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	28.6	.
Total (N)	6	9	7	7

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.5	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	8.3	9.1	10.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	41.7	45.5	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	33.3	27.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	16.7	18.2	.
Total (N)	9	12	11	10

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	7.1	83.3	100.0	100.0
No experience (%)	92.9	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	14	12	9	9

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	41.7	22.2	11.1
Yes (%)	.	58.3	77.8	88.9
Total (N)	14	12	9	9

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	33.3	22.2	.
Yes (%)	.	66.7	77.8	100.0
Total (N)	14	12	9	9

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	91.7	77.8	100.0
Yes (%)	.	8.3	22.2	.
Total (N)	14	12	9	9

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	92.9	91.7	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	7.1	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	14	12	9	9

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	18.2	25.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	75.0	54.5	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	27.3	12.5	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	4	11	8	9

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	9.1	12.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	36.4	75.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	45.5	.	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	2	11	8	9

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	8.3	25.0	44.4
3: Agree (%)	100.0	66.7	62.5	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	1	12	8	9

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	8.3	11.1	44.4
3: Agree (%)	100.0	75.0	55.6	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	16.7	22.2	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	1	12	9	9

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.0	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	10.0	28.6	44.4
3: Agree (%)	.	80.0	57.1	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	10.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	14.3	11.1
Total (N)	1	10	7	9

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	3.1	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	10.0	25.0	44.4
3: Agree (%)	.	90.0	62.5	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	1	10	8	9

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	10.0	16.7	37.5
3: Agree (%)	.	40.0	50.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	100.0	30.0	16.7	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	16.7	.
Total (N)	1	10	6	8

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	50.0	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	12	8	9

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.4	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	7.7	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	30.8	44.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	61.5	22.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	.	22.2	20.0
Total (N)	12	13	9	10

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2	2.3	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	54.5	38.5	25.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	46.2	37.5	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	15.4	25.0	22.2
Total (N)	11	13	8	9

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	10.0	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	71.4	80.0	40.0	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	10.0	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.	20.0	12.5
Total (N)	7	10	5	8

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0	2.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.	.	12.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	16.7	28.6	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	66.7	42.9	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	16.7	28.6	12.5
Total (N)	8	12	7	8

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.4	1.8	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	.	20.0	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	38.5	40.0	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	26.7	61.5	40.0	22.2
Total (N)	15	13	10	9

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	3.3	3.4
4: Very well (%)	.	15.4	30.8	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	62.5	69.2	69.2	40.0
2: Not very well (%)	31.3	15.4	.	10.0
1: Not at all (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.9	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	7.7	38.5	44.4
3: Agree (%)	27.3	76.9	53.8	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	15.4	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	11	13	13	9

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.0	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	38.5	15.4	60.0
3: Agree (%)	56.3	53.8	69.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	15.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.5	1.8	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	31.3	18.2	22.2	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	18.2	33.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	37.5	63.6	44.4	20.0
Total (N)	16	11	9	10

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0	1.7	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	53.3	36.4	30.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	27.3	10.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	36.4	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	15	11	10	8

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.1	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	71.4	66.7	42.9	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	22.2	28.6	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	11.1	28.6	42.9
Total (N)	14	9	7	7

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.8	2.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	37.5	15.4	46.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	53.8	30.8	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.3	30.8	23.1	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	15.4	38.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	76.9	53.8	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	7.7	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	8.3	23.1	30.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	91.7	69.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	.	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	12	13	10

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.8	3.1
4: Very important (%)	62.5	61.5	75.0	40.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	37.5	38.5	25.0	40.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	12	10

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.7	2.9
4: Very important (%)	56.3	61.5	69.2	10.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	37.5	30.8	30.8	80.0
2: Not very important (%)	6.3	7.7	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.3	3.0
4: Very important (%)	46.7	61.5	53.8	20.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	46.7	30.8	23.1	70.0
2: Not very important (%)	6.7	7.7	23.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.2
4: Very important (%)	50.0	53.8	61.5	30.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.8	30.8	23.1	60.0
2: Not very important (%)	6.3	15.4	15.4	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	2.8	3.1
4: Very important (%)	31.3	38.5	30.8	20.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	50.0	38.5	38.5	70.0
2: Not very important (%)	18.8	23.1	7.7	10.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	23.1	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0	2.8	2.6
4: Very important (%)	56.3	53.8	30.8	10.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.8	7.7	30.8	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	23.1	23.1	30.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	15.4	15.4	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	7.7	7.7	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	30.8	69.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	38.5	7.7	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.3	23.1	15.4	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	43.8	38.5	38.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	38.5	30.8	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	23.1	15.4	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	7.7	7.7	10.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	30.8	38.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	30.8	38.5	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	30.8	15.4	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.5	38.5	50.0	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	61.5	50.0	40.0
Total (N)	16	13	12	10

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	.
Total (N)	1	1

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.2	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.8	15.4	33.3	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	76.9	50.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	7.7	16.7	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	12	10

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.0	3.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	.	100.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	100.0	.	.
Total (N)	1	1	1

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.	7.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	75.0	61.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	16.7	23.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	12	13	10

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.	7.7	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	84.6	69.2	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	15.4	15.4	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	7.7	23.1	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	81.3	76.9	61.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	15.4	7.7	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.2	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	30.8	30.8	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	53.8	61.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	15.4	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	7.7	7.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	46.2	76.9	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	23.1	7.7	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	23.1	7.7	.
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8	2.0	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	.	33.3	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	75.0	33.3	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	25.0	33.3	20.0
Total (N)	8	8	9	5

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	.	7.7	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	45.5	46.2	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	36.4	38.5	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	18.2	7.7	11.1
Total (N)	16	11	13	9

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1	2.2	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	.	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	33.3	23.1	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	41.7	53.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	25.0	15.4	22.2
Total (N)	16	12	13	9

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	7-15	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	100.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	.	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3
Total (N)	1	3

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	14.3	33.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	57.1	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	3	7	3	2

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.6	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	9.1	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	78.6	60.0	54.5	90.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	30.0	27.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	10.0	9.1	.
Total (N)	14	10	11	10

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.	8.3	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	58.3	58.3	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3	25.0	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	8.3	8.3	.
Total (N)	15	12	12	9

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.	8.3	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	76.9	58.3	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	7.7	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	15.4	8.3	.
Total (N)	15	13	12	10

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	7.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	46.2	58.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	38.5	33.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	7.7	8.3	.
Total (N)	15	13	12	9

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	62.5	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	6	8	4	5

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	28.6	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	57.1	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	6	7	3	5

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	30.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	70.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	9	10	10	7

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	62.5	85.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	12.5	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	8	8	7	6

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	20.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	80.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	5	5	3	2

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	40.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	60.0	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	5	5	2	4

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	3.2	2.1	2.3
4: A lot (%)	13.3	61.5	15.4	.
3: Some (%)	33.3	15.4	30.8	60.0
2: A little (%)	13.3	7.7	.	10.0
1: None at all (%)	40.0	15.4	53.8	30.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	3.3	2.2	2.4
4: Very likely (%)	6.3	61.5	15.4	10.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	25.0	23.1	15.4	40.0
2: Not very likely (%)	37.5	.	46.2	30.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	31.3	15.4	23.1	20.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	8.3	7.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	81.3	58.3	69.2	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	33.3	23.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	12	13	10

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	18.2	7.7	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.8	45.5	84.6	90.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	36.4	7.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	11	13	10

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	14.3	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	71.4	71.4	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.	14.3	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	6	7	7	7

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	14.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	88.9	87.5	71.4	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	14.3	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	9	8	7	7

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	3.0	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	66.7	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	.	.
Total (N)	3	3	3	3

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	22.2	10.0	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	66.7	80.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	11.1	10.0	12.5
Total (N)	5	9	10	8

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	14.3	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	90.0	85.7	90.0	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	7	10	8

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	3.0	2.4	2.2
Once a week or more (%)	12.5	15.4	23.1	10.0
A few times a month (%)	6.3	15.4	.	10.0
A few times a semester (%)	6.3	15.4	.	10.0
Once a semester (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
Once a year (%)	.	15.4	7.7	.
Never (%)	68.8	38.5	61.5	70.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.3	1.8	2.7
Once a week or more (%)	6.3	7.7	7.7	.
A few times a month (%)	.	.	.	20.0
A few times a semester (%)	12.5	15.4	7.7	10.0
Once a semester (%)	6.3	15.4	7.7	30.0
Once a year (%)	12.5	15.4	.	.
Never (%)	62.5	46.2	76.9	40.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.2	1.1	1.0	1.2
A few times a semester (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Once a semester (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Once a year (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Never (%)	93.8	92.3	100.0	90.0
Total (N)	16	13	12	10

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	2.4	3.0	2.9
A few times a month (%)	.	15.4	7.7	.
A few times a semester (%)	12.5	7.7	46.2	40.0
Once a semester (%)	6.3	7.7	15.4	30.0
Once a year (%)	18.8	38.5	.	10.0
Never (%)	62.5	30.8	30.8	20.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	3.1	2.3
A few times a month (%)	6.3	.	15.4	10.0
A few times a semester (%)	25.0	30.8	30.8	10.0
Once a semester (%)	25.0	15.4	23.1	10.0
Once a year (%)	25.0	23.1	7.7	40.0
Never (%)	18.8	30.8	23.1	30.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.4	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	30.8	23.1	20.0
3: Some (%)	18.8	30.8	30.8	10.0
2: A little (%)	31.3	23.1	7.7	20.0
1: None at all (%)	31.3	15.4	38.5	50.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.5	1.6	1.6
4: Very likely (%)	6.3	.	.	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	25.0	16.7	30.8	20.0
2: Not very likely (%)	12.5	16.7	.	20.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	56.3	66.7	69.2	60.0
Total (N)	16	12	13	10

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	51.8	52.9	45.5	51.5
more than 60 hrs (%)	12.5	16.7	.	20.0
51 to 60 hrs (%)	25.0	25.0	23.1	10.0
41 to 50 hrs (%)	37.5	41.7	53.8	60.0
40 hrs or less (%)	25.0	16.7	23.1	10.0
Total (N)	16	12	13	10

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	38.5	39.4	49.8	45.5
more than 50% of time (%)	31.3	7.7	46.2	40.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	31.3	69.2	30.8	30.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	31.3	23.1	15.4	30.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	.	7.7	.
0% of time (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	.	7.7	.	10.0
Yes (%)	100.0	92.3	100.0	90.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	53.3	53.8	61.5	50.0
Yes (%)	46.7	46.2	38.5	50.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	46.7	30.8	38.5	40.0
Yes (%)	53.3	69.2	61.5	60.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	93.3	92.3	84.6	80.0
Yes (%)	6.7	7.7	15.4	20.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	80.0	76.9	53.8	40.0
Yes (%)	20.0	23.1	46.2	60.0
Total (N)	15	13	13	10

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.3	5.3	5.4	5.2
more than 50% of time (%)	6.3	.	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	6.3	15.4	15.4	10.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	18.8	7.7	7.7	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	62.5	69.2	61.5	70.0
0% of time (%)	6.3	7.7	15.4	20.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	26.7	25.0	36.4	25.0
Yes (%)	73.3	75.0	63.6	75.0
Total (N)	15	12	11	8

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	20.0	25.0	63.6	75.0
Yes (%)	80.0	75.0	36.4	25.0
Total (N)	15	12	11	8

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	36.9	23.2	25.6	30.8
more than 50% of time (%)	25.0	7.7	7.7	20.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	37.5	30.8	38.5	40.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.5	38.5	23.1	20.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.3	7.7	7.7	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.3	.	.	.
0% of time (%)	12.5	15.4	23.1	20.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0% of time (%)	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.4	6.8	3.5	0.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	7.7	7.7	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	7.7	.	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	15.4	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	12.5	15.4	30.8	.
0% of time (%)	87.5	53.8	61.5	100.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
No (%)	50.0	100.0	60.0
Yes (%)	50.0	.	40.0
Total (N)	2	6	5

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
No (%)	100.0	50.0	80.0
Yes (%)	.	50.0	20.0
Total (N)	2	6	5

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
No (%)	100.0	66.7	100.0
Yes (%)	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	2	6	5

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
No (%)	50.0	50.0	80.0
Yes (%)	50.0	50.0	20.0
Total (N)	2	6	5

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
No (%)	100.0	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	2	6	5

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.1	18.4	11.5	7.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	15.4	7.7	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.5	53.8	38.5	20.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	25.0	7.7	7.7	20.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	50.0	7.7	46.2	30.0
0% of time (%)	12.5	15.4	.	30.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	71.4	63.6	53.8	85.7
Yes (%)	28.6	36.4	46.2	14.3
Total (N)	14	11	13	7

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	7.1	9.1	23.1	14.3
Yes (%)	92.9	90.9	76.9	85.7
Total (N)	14	11	13	7

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	35.7	27.3	38.5	57.1
Yes (%)	64.3	72.7	61.5	42.9
Total (N)	14	11	13	7

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	78.6	54.5	76.9	71.4
Yes (%)	21.4	45.5	23.1	28.6
Total (N)	14	11	13	7

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	85.7	45.5	69.2	85.7
Yes (%)	14.3	54.5	30.8	14.3
Total (N)	14	11	13	7

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.3	1.5	0.0	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	7.7	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.3	.	.	.
0% of time (%)	93.8	92.3	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.8	10.0	4.2	11.0
more than 50% of time (%)	.	7.7	.	10.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	6.3	.	7.7	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	15.4	.	10.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	7.7	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.3	.	7.7	20.0
0% of time (%)	87.5	69.2	84.6	60.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	43.8	15.4	53.8	40.0
Yes (%)	56.3	84.6	46.2	60.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	53.8	61.5	70.0
Yes (%)	25.0	46.2	38.5	30.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	84.6	84.6	90.0
Yes (%)	.	15.4	15.4	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	84.6	61.5	90.0
Yes (%)	25.0	15.4	38.5	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	62.5	30.8	30.8	40.0
Yes (%)	37.5	69.2	69.2	60.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	23.1	53.8	60.0
Yes (%)	25.0	76.9	46.2	40.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	100.0	92.3	100.0
Yes (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Never (%)	12.5	15.4	23.1	20.0
A few times (%)	50.0	23.1	30.8	40.0
About once per month (%)	12.5	7.7	15.4	20.0
Two or three times per month (%)	18.8	23.1	7.7	20.0
At least once per week (%)	6.3	30.8	23.1	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Never (%)	87.5	46.2	38.5	30.0
Once or twice (%)	6.3	38.5	38.5	50.0
Three to five times (%)	.	.	15.4	10.0
Six to ten times (%)	6.3	7.7	.	.
More than 10 times (%)	.	7.7	7.7	10.0
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	25.0	.	7.7	40.0
2 (%)	18.8	7.7	38.5	30.0
3 (%)	37.5	46.2	30.8	20.0
4 (%)	12.5	30.8	15.4	10.0
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	6.3	15.4	7.7	.
Total (N)	16	13	13	10

M7: Change how you spend your work time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
I would change how I spent time (%)	56.3	90.0	58.3	37.5
I would not change a thing (%)	43.8	10.0	41.7	62.5
Total (N)	16	10	12	8

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	6 or fewer