North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Management
by Rank/Tenure Status 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
..... No (%)	47.4	94.1	88.9	81.8
..... Yes (%)	52.6	5.9	11.1	18.2
Total (N)	19	17	9	11

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.5	2.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	11.8	11.1	30.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	41.2	55.6	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	35.3	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.8	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	17	9	10

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	6.7	.	9.1
3: Agree (%)	57.9	40.0	22.2	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	33.3	55.6	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	11

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	.	.	36.4
3: Agree (%)	52.6	64.3	77.8	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	14.3	11.1	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	21.4	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	14	9	11

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.0	3.1	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	11.1	.	.	.
4: Strong (%)	38.9	33.3	33.3	54.5
3: Average (%)	50.0	40.0	44.4	45.5
2: Weak (%)	.	20.0	22.2	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	6.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	15	9	11

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2	3.3	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	10.5	.	.	10.0
4: Strong (%)	42.1	37.5	44.4	60.0
3: Average (%)	42.1	43.8	44.4	30.0
2: Weak (%)	5.3	18.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	10

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.9	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	.	.	.	9.1
4: Strong (%)	31.6	25.0	22.2	27.3
3: Average (%)	63.2	50.0	44.4	63.6
2: Weak (%)	5.3	25.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strong (%)	.	50.0	.	25.0
3: Average (%)	66.7	.	100.0	50.0
2: Weak (%)	33.3	50.0	.	25.0
Total (N)	3	2	2	4

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.3	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	10.0	20.0	.	11.1
4: Strong (%)	50.0	33.3	50.0	55.6
3: Average (%)	40.0	26.7	33.3	33.3
2: Weak (%)	.	6.7	16.7	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	10	15	6	9

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.1	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	7.7	7.1	11.1	10.0
4: Strong (%)	15.4	35.7	22.2	60.0
3: Average (%)	69.2	42.9	44.4	30.0
2: Weak (%)	.	14.3	11.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	7.7	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	13	14	9	10

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.4	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	.	8.3	.	.
4: Strong (%)	26.7	8.3	37.5	77.8
3: Average (%)	60.0	41.7	62.5	22.2
2: Weak (%)	6.7	33.3	.	.
1: Very weak (%)	6.7	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	15	12	8	9

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	3.8	3.8	4.0
A (%)	.	6.3	.	.
B (%)	88.9	68.8	77.8	100.0
C (%)	11.1	18.8	22.2	.
D (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1	4.0	4.4
A (%)	31.6	31.3	11.1	40.0
B (%)	57.9	50.0	77.8	60.0
C (%)	5.3	18.8	11.1	.
D (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	10

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.4	3.9	3.8	4.2
A (%)	42.1	18.8	11.1	18.2
B (%)	52.6	62.5	55.6	81.8
C (%)	5.3	12.5	33.3	.
D (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.1	3.8	3.7	4.4
A (%)	31.6	12.5	11.1	36.4
B (%)	47.4	56.3	44.4	63.6
C (%)	15.8	31.3	44.4	.
D (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.4	4.3	4.1	4.5
A (%)	38.9	37.5	11.1	45.5
B (%)	61.1	56.3	88.9	54.5
C (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	4.6	4.3	4.0	4.4
A (%)	55.6	37.5	11.1	36.4
B (%)	44.4	50.0	77.8	63.6
C (%)	.	12.5	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

B4: Department's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	52.6	18.8	.	45.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	42.1	25.0	33.3	45.5
No clear vision (%)	5.3	56.3	55.6	9.1
Not familiar (%)	.	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	28.6	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	57.1	100.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	7	3	10

B6: College's vision for the future	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	36.8	12.5	11.1	72.7
Vision with slow progress (%)	42.1	56.3	55.6	27.3
No clear vision (%)	15.8	31.3	33.3	.
Not familiar (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

B7a: Department change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	42.1	56.3	66.7	54.5
Change for the worse (%)	21.1	18.8	22.2	18.2
Not really change (%)	36.8	25.0	11.1	27.3
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

B7b: College change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	44.4	50.0	44.4	72.7
Change for the worse (%)	33.3	12.5	11.1	.
Not really change (%)	22.2	37.5	44.4	27.3
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Change for the better (%)	31.6	43.8	44.4	36.4
Change for the worse (%)	15.8	.	.	.
Not really change (%)	52.6	56.3	55.6	63.6
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.1	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	55.6	6.3	11.1	18.2
3: Good (%)	27.8	25.0	55.6	54.5
2: Fair (%)	16.7	37.5	22.2	27.3
1: Poor (%)	.	31.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	2.3	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	77.8	12.5	11.1	18.2
3: Good (%)	16.7	25.0	55.6	72.7
2: Fair (%)	5.6	37.5	11.1	9.1
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	2.3	2.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	77.8	12.5	11.1	9.1
3: Good (%)	16.7	18.8	55.6	72.7
2: Fair (%)	5.6	50.0	.	18.2
1: Poor (%)	.	18.8	33.3	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.4	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	61.1	12.5	11.1	9.1
3: Good (%)	33.3	50.0	55.6	63.6
2: Fair (%)	5.6	6.3	11.1	27.3
1: Poor (%)	.	31.3	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.6	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	61.1	25.0	33.3	30.0
3: Good (%)	38.9	37.5	44.4	70.0
2: Fair (%)	.	12.5	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	10

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	1.9	2.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	.	11.1	20.0
3: Good (%)	47.1	25.0	22.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	23.5	37.5	33.3	30.0
1: Poor (%)	.	37.5	33.3	.
Total (N)	17	16	9	10

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.1	2.3	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	44.4	12.5	12.5	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	12.5	25.0	63.6
2: Fair (%)	5.6	43.8	37.5	18.2
1: Poor (%)	.	31.3	25.0	18.2
Total (N)	18	16	8	11

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	1.7	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	38.9	6.3	12.5	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	6.3	50.0	70.0
2: Fair (%)	11.1	37.5	12.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	.	50.0	25.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	8	10

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	1.9	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	64.7	25.0	44.4	81.8
2: Fair (%)	17.6	43.8	44.4	18.2
1: Poor (%)	5.9	31.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	17	16	9	11

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.0	2.3	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	6.3	.	.
3: Good (%)	62.5	25.0	55.6	63.6
2: Fair (%)	6.3	31.3	22.2	18.2
1: Poor (%)	.	37.5	22.2	18.2
Total (N)	16	16	9	11

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	44.4	31.3	12.5	10.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	37.5	62.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	11.1	18.8	12.5	30.0
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5	12.5	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	8	10

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	2.9	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	77.8	40.0	22.2	33.3
3: Good (%)	22.2	26.7	55.6	55.6
2: Fair (%)	.	13.3	11.1	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	20.0	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	15	9	9

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.3	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	70.6	6.3	11.1	10.0
3: Good (%)	23.5	37.5	44.4	70.0
2: Fair (%)	5.9	37.5	33.3	10.0
1: Poor (%)	.	18.8	11.1	10.0
Total (N)	17	16	9	10

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	1.9	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	47.1	.	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	47.1	26.7	44.4	70.0
2: Fair (%)	5.9	33.3	11.1	20.0
1: Poor (%)	.	40.0	33.3	10.0
Total (N)	17	15	9	10

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.7	2.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	53.3	23.1	12.5	10.0
3: Good (%)	46.7	38.5	25.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	.	23.1	25.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	.	15.4	37.5	.
Total (N)	15	13	8	10

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.3	6.3	.	18.2
3: Good (%)	63.2	37.5	44.4	81.8
2: Fair (%)	21.1	50.0	33.3	.
1: Poor (%)	10.5	6.3	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	22.2	12.5	11.1	27.3
3: Good (%)	33.3	43.8	33.3	72.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	31.3	22.2	.
1: Poor (%)	11.1	12.5	33.3	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	12.5	11.1	9.1
3: Good (%)	27.8	31.3	11.1	72.7
2: Fair (%)	38.9	43.8	44.4	9.1
1: Poor (%)	16.7	12.5	33.3	9.1
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	15.8	12.5	11.1	20.0
3: Good (%)	42.1	43.8	22.2	70.0
2: Fair (%)	36.8	25.0	33.3	10.0
1: Poor (%)	5.3	18.8	33.3	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	10

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	1.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	22.2	6.3	.	18.2
3: Good (%)	44.4	31.3	22.2	72.7
2: Fair (%)	27.8	56.3	44.4	9.1
1: Poor (%)	5.6	6.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	1.9	1.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	.	.	10.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	18.8	37.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	27.8	50.0	12.5	30.0
1: Poor (%)	11.1	31.3	50.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	8	10

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9	1.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	.	.	11.1
3: Good (%)	26.7	20.0	25.0	66.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	46.7	37.5	22.2
1: Poor (%)	26.7	33.3	37.5	.
Total (N)	15	15	8	9

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9	2.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	5.3	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	26.3	31.3	33.3	81.8
2: Fair (%)	63.2	31.3	55.6	18.2
1: Poor (%)	5.3	37.5	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	1.9	2.2	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	6.3	.	11.1	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	20.0	22.2	81.8
2: Fair (%)	37.5	46.7	44.4	.
1: Poor (%)	6.3	33.3	22.2	18.2
Total (N)	16	15	9	11

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.3	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	30.8	.	18.2
3: Good (%)	61.5	46.2	55.6	81.8
2: Fair (%)	15.4	.	22.2	.
1: Poor (%)	7.7	23.1	22.2	.
Total (N)	13	13	9	11

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	26.7	11.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	73.3	53.3	66.7	66.7
2: Fair (%)	.	6.7	22.2	.
1: Poor (%)	.	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	15	15	9	9

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.3	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	17.6	6.7	.	10.0
3: Good (%)	64.7	40.0	55.6	90.0
2: Fair (%)	5.9	33.3	22.2	.
1: Poor (%)	11.8	20.0	22.2	.
Total (N)	17	15	9	10

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	2.1	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	.	.	11.1
3: Good (%)	46.7	33.3	44.4	77.8
2: Fair (%)	40.0	46.7	22.2	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	20.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	15	15	9	9

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	2.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	25.0	.	22.2
3: Good (%)	40.0	41.7	37.5	66.7
2: Fair (%)	20.0	25.0	37.5	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	15	12	8	9

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.5	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	17.6	42.9	62.5	45.5
2: Fair (%)	70.6	28.6	25.0	18.2
1: Poor (%)	.	28.6	12.5	36.4
Total (N)	17	14	8	11

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9	2.4	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	23.1	27.3	42.9	37.5
2: Fair (%)	46.2	36.4	57.1	37.5
1: Poor (%)	23.1	36.4	.	25.0
Total (N)	13	11	7	8

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	2.4	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	50.0	62.5	54.5
2: Fair (%)	33.3	10.0	12.5	18.2
1: Poor (%)	6.7	40.0	25.0	27.3
Total (N)	15	10	8	11

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	.	28.6	10.0
3: Good (%)	61.5	62.5	28.6	40.0
2: Fair (%)	15.4	12.5	42.9	30.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	25.0	.	20.0
Total (N)	13	8	7	10

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	14.3	14.3	.
3: Good (%)	70.6	57.1	85.7	90.9
2: Fair (%)	17.6	14.3	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	14.3	.	9.1
Total (N)	17	14	7	11

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	.	.	11.1
3: Good (%)	53.8	45.5	85.7	66.7
2: Fair (%)	23.1	36.4	14.3	22.2
1: Poor (%)	15.4	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	13	11	7	9

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.9	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	41.7	45.5	85.7	77.8
2: Fair (%)	33.3	36.4	14.3	.
1: Poor (%)	16.7	18.2	.	22.2
Total (N)	12	11	7	9

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	23.1	.	.
3: Good (%)	28.6	53.8	66.7	66.7
2: Fair (%)	28.6	7.7	33.3	33.3
1: Poor (%)	7.1	15.4	.	.
Total (N)	14	13	6	9

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.6	37.5	44.4	45.5
3: Agree (%)	47.4	31.3	44.4	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.7	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.1	18.8	11.1	36.4
3: Agree (%)	38.9	50.0	77.8	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.1	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	84.2	43.8	44.4	.
3: Agree (%)	15.8	31.3	33.3	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	18.8	11.1	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	11.1	9.1
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	25.0	11.1	18.2
3: Agree (%)	63.2	56.3	55.6	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	6.3	11.1	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	22.2	9.1
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	12.5	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	37.5	22.2	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	37.5	44.4	45.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	12.5	22.2	18.2
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.5	2.8
4: Very familiar (%)	36.8	18.8	.	27.3
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	52.6	62.5	62.5	36.4
2: Not very familiar (%)	10.5	6.3	25.0	27.3
1: Not at all familiar (%)	.	12.5	12.5	9.1
Total (N)	19	16	8	11

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	1.8	2.3
4: Very well (%)	.	12.5	.	18.2
3: Fairly well (%)	47.4	37.5	11.1	18.2
2: Not very well (%)	42.1	31.3	55.6	36.4
1: Not at all (%)	10.5	18.8	33.3	27.3
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	1.7	2.4
4: Very well (%)	.	6.3	.	18.2
3: Fairly well (%)	42.1	43.8	.	18.2
2: Not very well (%)	52.6	37.5	66.7	45.5
1: Not at all (%)	5.3	12.5	33.3	18.2
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.1	2.9
4: Very well (%)	5.3	6.3	.	18.2
3: Fairly well (%)	52.6	50.0	33.3	54.5
2: Not very well (%)	36.8	25.0	44.4	27.3
1: Not at all (%)	5.3	18.8	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.4	2.6	3.1
4: Very well (%)	47.4	12.5	11.1	18.2
3: Fairly well (%)	52.6	31.3	44.4	72.7
2: Not very well (%)	.	37.5	33.3	9.1
1: Not at all (%)	.	18.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	1.9	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	47.4	18.8	44.4	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	50.0	44.4	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	31.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	2.9	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	78.9	25.0	33.3	18.2
3: Agree (%)	21.1	56.3	55.6	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	18.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.5	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	63.2	18.8	44.4	30.0
3: Good (%)	31.6	37.5	22.2	60.0
2: Fair (%)	5.3	18.8	11.1	10.0
1: Poor (%)	.	25.0	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	10

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	12.5	.	9.1
3: Good (%)	36.8	50.0	55.6	63.6
2: Fair (%)	31.6	25.0	22.2	27.3
1: Poor (%)	21.1	12.5	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	16	9	11

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	14.3	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	35.7	66.7	50.0	57.1
2: Fair (%)	42.9	11.1	50.0	42.9
1: Poor (%)	7.1	22.2	.	.
Total (N)	14	9	4	7

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.8	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	35.7	60.0	75.0	60.0
2: Fair (%)	50.0	40.0	25.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	14	5	4	5

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	9.1	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	40.0	54.5	75.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	9.1	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	27.3	.	.
Total (N)	15	11	4	3

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	10.0	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	18.8	60.0	100.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	10.0	.	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	16	10	3	3

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	10.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	25.0	40.0	66.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	20.0	33.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.3	30.0	.	.
Total (N)	16	10	3	4

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	3.0	3.3
4: Very effective (%)	36.4	16.7	.	33.3
3: Somewhat effective (%)	45.5	33.3	100.0	66.7
2: Not very effective (%)	9.1	50.0	.	.
1: Not at all effective (%)	9.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	11	6	2	3

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	27.8	50.0	66.7	54.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.9	31.3	33.3	36.4
2: Not very important (%)	27.8	18.8	.	9.1
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	11

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	3.1	3.5
4: Very important (%)	21.1	20.0	44.4	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	47.4	40.0	33.3	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	21.1	13.3	11.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	10.5	26.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.7	3.2
4: Very important (%)	10.5	20.0	22.2	30.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.6	33.3	44.4	60.0
2: Not very important (%)	36.8	20.0	11.1	10.0
1: Not at all important (%)	21.1	26.7	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	28.6	.	.
3: Agree (%)	76.5	57.1	62.5	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3	25.0	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	17	14	8	9

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	27.3	25.0	42.9
3: Agree (%)	68.8	45.5	50.0	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	9.1	25.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	16	11	4	7

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	3.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	27.3	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	45.5	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	9.1	25.0	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	16	11	4	5

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	40.0	20.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	71.4	30.0	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0	20.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	14	10	5	6

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	54.5	.	28.6
3: Agree (%)	68.4	18.2	33.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	9.1	66.7	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	19	11	6	7

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	54.5	16.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	27.3	50.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	18	11	6	8

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	54.5	20.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	47.1	18.2	40.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	9.1	40.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	18.2	.	.
Total (N)	17	11	5	7

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.2	42.9	42.9	22.2
3: Agree (%)	31.6	50.0	57.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	11.1
Total (N)	19	14	7	9

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.2	58.3	75.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	30.8	33.3	25.0	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.	12.5
Total (N)	13	12	4	8

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.6	46.2	42.9	30.0
3: Agree (%)	29.4	38.5	28.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	7.7	28.6	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	17	13	7	10

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.0	50.0	50.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	20.0	40.0	50.0	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	10	10	2	5

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	42.9	50.0	22.2
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	16.7	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	18	14	6	9

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	46.2	42.9	20.0
3: Agree (%)	27.8	38.5	14.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	7.7	42.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	13	7	10

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	50.0	60.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	22.2	41.7	20.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	12	5	7

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.1	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	33.3	33.3	40.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	55.6	33.3	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1	.	20.0
Total (N)	12	9	3	5

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.2	53.8	57.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	36.8	38.5	42.9	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	19	13	7	10

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.7	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.9	58.3	66.7	37.5
3: Agree (%)	23.1	33.3	33.3	62.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	12	6	8

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.7	50.0	57.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	26.3	41.7	42.9	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	12	7	10

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.7	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	81.8	45.5	66.7	42.9
3: Agree (%)	18.2	45.5	33.3	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	11	11	3	7

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.7	53.8	57.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	26.3	38.5	42.9	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	19	13	7	10

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.7	53.8	57.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	26.3	38.5	42.9	60.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	19	13	7	10

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	53.8	57.1	44.4
3: Agree (%)	22.2	38.5	42.9	55.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	13	7	9

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.2	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	84.6	40.0	33.3	42.9
3: Agree (%)	15.4	50.0	66.7	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	13	10	3	7

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	1.9	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	.	14.3	.	.
3: Some (%)	31.6	28.6	42.9	80.0
2: A little (%)	42.1	14.3	.	10.0
1: Not at all (%)	26.3	42.9	57.1	10.0
Total (N)	19	14	7	10

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	2.1	1.5	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	5.3	6.7	.	11.1
3: Some (%)	10.5	26.7	12.5	55.6
2: A little (%)	42.1	33.3	25.0	22.2
1: Not at all (%)	42.1	33.3	62.5	11.1
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	26.3	60.0	37.5	10.0
3: Some (%)	42.1	6.7	37.5	20.0
2: A little (%)	26.3	6.7	25.0	20.0
1: None (%)	5.3	26.7	.	50.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1	2.6	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	15.8	60.0	25.0	30.0
3: Some (%)	47.4	13.3	37.5	40.0
2: A little (%)	15.8	6.7	12.5	20.0
1: None (%)	21.1	20.0	25.0	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.3	1.9	1.9	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	5.3	6.7	.	.
3: Some (%)	.	33.3	25.0	20.0
2: A little (%)	15.8	.	37.5	50.0
1: None (%)	78.9	60.0	37.5	30.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1	2.3	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	5.3	13.3	12.5	10.0
3: Some (%)	10.5	33.3	25.0	20.0
2: A little (%)	36.8	6.7	37.5	30.0
1: None (%)	47.4	46.7	25.0	40.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.4	1.9	2.1	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	.	6.7	12.5	10.0
3: Some (%)	10.5	26.7	37.5	10.0
2: A little (%)	21.1	13.3	.	30.0
1: None (%)	68.4	53.3	50.0	50.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1	2.1	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	5.3	6.7	14.3	10.0
3: Some (%)	26.3	20.0	28.6	.
2: A little (%)	31.6	46.7	14.3	30.0
1: None (%)	36.8	26.7	42.9	60.0
Total (N)	19	15	7	10

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.4	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.9	.	22.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	36.8	60.0	33.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	20.0	22.2	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	22.2	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.6	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.1	40.0	55.6	80.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	60.0	44.4	20.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	2.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	20.0	11.1	10.0
3: Agree (%)	68.4	46.7	55.6	90.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	26.7	22.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.5	2.7	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.4	.	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	52.6	80.0	33.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	13.3	22.2	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	11.1	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	46.7	44.4	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	38.9	40.0	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	13.3	22.2	14.3
Total (N)	18	15	9	7

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	54.5	33.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	27.3	50.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	18.2	16.7	20.0
Total (N)	14	11	6	5

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	6.7	33.3	30.0
3: Agree (%)	63.2	73.3	44.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	13.3	11.1	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.0	2.6
Frequently (%)	36.8	20.0	22.2	20.0
Sometimes (%)	36.8	60.0	66.7	40.0
Seldom (%)	21.1	20.0	.	20.0
Never (%)	5.3	.	11.1	20.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2	3.4	1.8
Frequently (%)	63.2	40.0	44.4	10.0
Sometimes (%)	36.8	40.0	55.6	10.0
Seldom (%)	.	20.0	.	30.0
Never (%)	.	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.1	3.3
Frequently (%)	55.6	42.9	22.2	30.0
Sometimes (%)	27.8	35.7	66.7	70.0
Seldom (%)	16.7	21.4	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	14	9	10

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.0	2.0
Frequently (%)	47.4	42.9	33.3	.
Sometimes (%)	31.6	50.0	44.4	30.0
Seldom (%)	21.1	7.1	11.1	40.0
Never (%)	.	.	11.1	30.0
Total (N)	19	14	9	10

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3	1.9	1.7
Frequently (%)	5.6	14.3	.	10.0
Sometimes (%)	33.3	28.6	22.2	.
Seldom (%)	27.8	28.6	44.4	40.0
Never (%)	33.3	28.6	33.3	50.0
Total (N)	18	14	9	10

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9	3.3	2.5
Frequently (%)	57.9	40.0	33.3	.
Sometimes (%)	31.6	20.0	66.7	60.0
Seldom (%)	5.3	33.3	.	30.0
Never (%)	5.3	6.7	.	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.3	2.1
Frequently (%)	21.1	26.7	33.3	.
Sometimes (%)	21.1	26.7	11.1	40.0
Seldom (%)	42.1	20.0	11.1	30.0
Never (%)	15.8	26.7	44.4	30.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.8	2.0
Frequently (%)	21.1	40.0	77.8	.
Sometimes (%)	68.4	33.3	22.2	40.0
Seldom (%)	.	20.0	.	20.0
Never (%)	10.5	6.7	.	40.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.1	2.7	2.2	1.9
Frequently (%)	15.8	13.3	.	10.0
Sometimes (%)	15.8	53.3	55.6	20.0
Seldom (%)	31.6	20.0	11.1	20.0
Never (%)	36.8	13.3	33.3	50.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.8	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	73.7	53.3	77.8	55.6
3: Satisfied (%)	26.3	33.3	22.2	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.8	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	63.2	26.7	22.2	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	31.6	46.7	55.6	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	6.7	.	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.9	2.9	3.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	89.5	40.0	33.3	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	10.5	26.7	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7	3.7	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	89.5	73.3	66.7	44.4
3: Satisfied (%)	5.3	26.7	33.3	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.6	20.0	33.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	42.1	33.3	44.4	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	33.3	11.1	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	13.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	15.4	.	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	61.5	55.6	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	15.4	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	7.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	13	9	9

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.7	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.8	13.3	11.1	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	73.3	55.6	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	13.3	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	15	9	5

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	1.6	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	16.7	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	11.1	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	8.3	33.3	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.7	41.7	55.6	.
Total (N)	15	12	9	9

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	1.6	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	9.1	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	27.3	22.2	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	27.3	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.3	36.4	66.7	.
Total (N)	17	11	9	1

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	13.3	22.2	40.0
3: Agree (%)	63.2	66.7	66.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	6.7	11.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	6.7	25.0	44.4
3: Agree (%)	61.1	53.3	50.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	26.7	25.0	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	15	8	9

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.5	3.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	.	50.0
Total (N)	3	2	2	4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6	2.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.	16.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	71.4	66.7	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	14.3	.	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	12	7	6	8

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	.	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	63.2	46.7	62.5	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	33.3	25.0	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	20.0	12.5	33.3
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.1	7.1	11.1	44.4
3: Agree (%)	47.4	78.6	44.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	7.1	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	7.1	33.3	22.2
Total (N)	19	14	9	9

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	2.7	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	33.3	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	66.7	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	33.3	66.7
Total (N)	3	3	3	3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	11.1	33.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	70.0	33.3	33.3	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	33.3	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	22.2	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	10	9	3	9

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.3	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.3	26.7	44.4	70.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.9	66.7	44.4	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	6.7	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	1.8	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	7.7	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	46.2	25.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.3	23.1	25.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	23.1	50.0	33.3
Total (N)	17	13	8	3

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.2	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	23.1	16.7	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	73.3	61.5	83.3	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	15.4	.	.
Total (N)	15	13	6	7

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.8	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	46.2	60.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	30.8	.	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	23.1	20.0	20.0
Total (N)	16	13	5	5

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	7.1	12.5	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	64.3	62.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	7.1	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.6	21.4	.	.
Total (N)	17	14	8	9

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	18.2	28.6	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	76.5	72.7	57.1	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	9.1	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	17	11	7	9

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1	2.6	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	.	11.1	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.9	40.0	44.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	26.7	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	33.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	2

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	46.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.4	13.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.6	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	17	15	6

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	1.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	8.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	31.6	25.0	25.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.8	25.0	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.3	41.7	50.0	.
Total (N)	19	12	4	1

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	3.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	50.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	85.7	66.7	50.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	16.7	.	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	7	12	2	8

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	1.9	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	20.0	66.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	50.0	.	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	30.0	16.7	16.7
Total (N)	13	10	6	6

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.4	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.6	35.7	44.4	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	42.9	55.6	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	7.1	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	14	9	10

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	16.7	33.3	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	87.5	58.3	44.4	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	8.3	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	11.1	20.0
Total (N)	16	12	9	10

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	14.3	20.0	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	42.9	60.0	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	28.6	.	.
Total (N)	11	7	5	7

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Yes (%)	.	.	.	20.0
No (%)	100.0	100.0	100.0	80.0
Total (N)	19	14	9	10

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	100.0
Total (N)	2

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	1.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	87.5	37.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	50.0	16.7
Total (N)	8	8	6

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	40.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	40.0	20.0
Total (N)	6	5	5

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	42.9	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	28.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	28.6	40.0
Total (N)	5	7	5

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	5	5	3

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	1.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	16.7	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	.	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	66.7	.
Total (N)	4	6	4

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.8	1.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	16.7	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	.	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	.
Total (N)	4	6	4

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.7	1.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	28.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	57.1	.
Total (N)	3	7	3

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.7	3.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.1	20.0	22.2	10.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	46.7	66.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	.	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	11.1	20.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.9	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.2	20.0	11.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	31.6	60.0	55.6	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	6.7	22.2	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	11.1	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.6	2.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	13.3	25.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	46.7	37.5	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	26.7	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	18	15	8	4

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	25.0	16.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	63.2	75.0	83.3	50.0
Total (N)	19	12	6	2

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5	2.6	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	6.7	14.3	100.0
3: Agree (%)	47.1	60.0	42.9	.
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	13.3	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	20.0	14.3	.
Total (N)	17	15	7	1

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional development	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	12.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	61.1	53.3	50.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	20.0	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	26.7	25.0	28.6
Total (N)	18	15	8	7

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	2.3	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	.	12.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	72.2	60.0	75.0	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	13.3	12.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	26.7	.	14.3
Total (N)	18	15	8	7

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.0	2.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.	.	28.6
3: Agree (%)	62.5	33.3	37.5	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	33.3	25.0	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	37.5	14.3
Total (N)	16	15	8	7

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.0	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	.	12.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	66.7	28.6	37.5	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	42.9	25.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	28.6	25.0	.
Total (N)	18	14	8	7

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.7	2.6
4: Very well (%)	31.6	26.7	11.1	11.1
3: Fairly well (%)	47.4	46.7	44.4	44.4
2: Not very well (%)	21.1	20.0	44.4	33.3
1: Not at all (%)	.	6.7	.	11.1
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	21.1	6.7	44.4	100.0
Yes (%)	78.9	93.3	55.6	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	5.3	20.0	88.9	100.0
Yes (%)	94.7	80.0	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	10.5	33.3	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	89.5	66.7	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	100.0	100.0	55.6	10.0
Yes (%)	.	.	44.4	90.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.0	2.2
4: Very well (%)	84.2	46.7	11.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	15.8	46.7	77.8	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	.	.	11.1	55.6
1: Not at all (%)	.	6.7	.	11.1
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	2.8	2.3
4: Very well (%)	73.7	33.3	11.1	.
3: Fairly well (%)	21.1	60.0	66.7	44.4
2: Not very well (%)	5.3	6.7	11.1	44.4
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	19	15	9	9

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.3	2.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.4	13.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	26.3	33.3	37.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	20.0	25.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	37.5	33.3
Total (N)	19	15	8	3

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.7	2.5	2.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	77.8	13.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	11.1	40.0	33.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	26.7	33.3	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	18	15	6	3

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	7.7	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	83.3	30.8	55.6	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	53.8	11.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	13	9	8

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	10.0	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	50.0	28.6	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	20.0	28.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	20.0	28.6	.
Total (N)	16	10	7	8

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	50.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	50.0	.	50.0
Total (N)	2	2	4

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	10.0	20.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	66.7	30.0	60.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	50.0	.	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	10.0	20.0	.
Total (N)	9	10	5	8

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	20.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	87.5	50.0	40.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	37.5	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	12.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	8	8	5	6

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	16.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1	45.5	50.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	36.4	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	18.2	.	14.3
Total (N)	14	11	6	7

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	6.7	.	22.2
3: Agree (%)	73.7	33.3	75.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	46.7	25.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	27.3	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	45.5	33.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	27.3	16.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	16	11	6	5

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.0	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0	100.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	3	2	1	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	20.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	40.0	25.0	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	30.0	50.0	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	8	10	4	8

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	10.0	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	77.8	10.0	25.0	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	30.0	.	16.7
Total (N)	9	10	4	6

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1	2.4	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	7.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	64.7	23.1	40.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	38.5	60.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	30.8	.	28.6
Total (N)	17	13	5	7

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Has experience (%)	94.7	66.7	11.1	.
No experience (%)	5.3	33.3	88.9	100.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	1

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	26.3	46.7	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	73.7	53.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	1

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	10.5	53.3	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	89.5	46.7	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	1

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	84.2	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	15.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	1

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
No (%)	100.0	93.3	88.9	100.0
Yes (%)	.	6.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	15	9	1

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	38.9	58.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	8.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	8.3	.
Total (N)	18	12	2

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.5	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	47.1	45.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	27.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	18.2	.
Total (N)	17	11	2

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	54.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	27.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	9.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	1

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.3	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	47.4	63.6	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	18.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	9.1	.
Total (N)	19	11	1

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	61.1	62.5	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	12.5	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	12.5	.
Total (N)	18	8	1

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	63.2	75.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	12.5	.
Total (N)	19	8	1

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	44.4	.
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	11.1	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	15	9	1

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	10.0
Total (N)	19	10

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1	3.0	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	.	40.0	.
3: Agree (%)	64.7	26.7	40.0	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	53.3	.	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	20.0	20.0	28.6
Total (N)	17	15	5	7

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1	2.4	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	46.7	28.6	60.0	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	40.0	50.0	20.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	21.4	20.0	42.9
Total (N)	15	14	5	7

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	72.7	75.0	66.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.3	33.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	11	12	3	4

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0	2.5	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	7.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	41.7	15.4	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	41.7	46.2	50.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	30.8	.	16.7
Total (N)	12	13	4	6

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6	1.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	6.7	.	.
3: Agree (%)	11.8	6.7	25.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	58.8	26.7	37.5	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.4	60.0	37.5	14.3
Total (N)	17	15	8	7

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.5	3.0
4: Very well (%)	36.8	20.0	.	10.0
3: Fairly well (%)	52.6	60.0	62.5	80.0
2: Not very well (%)	10.5	20.0	25.0	10.0
1: Not at all (%)	.	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.6	2.5	2.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	.	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	60.0	.	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	33.3	40.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	40.0	.
Total (N)	18	15	5	8

J4: I have access to benefits information	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	46.7	62.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	46.7	37.5	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	6.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.9	1.6	2.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	12.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	23.5	14.3	25.0	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	41.2	28.6	12.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	35.3	57.1	50.0	14.3
Total (N)	17	14	8	7

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.6	2.4	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	7.1	14.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	25.0	42.9	57.1	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	28.6	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	62.5	21.4	.	28.6
Total (N)	16	14	7	7

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.8	2.7	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	16.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	18.2	76.9	66.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	15.4	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.4	7.7	.	28.6
Total (N)	11	13	6	7

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8	2.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	10.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	20.0	37.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.1	40.0	25.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	40.0	37.5	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	2.7	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.4	6.7	12.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	47.4	73.3	75.0	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	6.7	12.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.3	7.1	12.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	68.4	78.6	75.0	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	7.1	12.5	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	50.0	60.0	62.5	80.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.9	40.0	37.5	20.0
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	.	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	15	8	10

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.6	3.9
4: Very important (%)	31.6	46.7	62.5	90.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	63.2	40.0	37.5	10.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	13.3	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	26.3	46.7	62.5	77.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	63.2	33.3	37.5	11.1
2: Not very important (%)	5.3	20.0	.	11.1
1: Not at all important (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.8	3.7
4: Very important (%)	31.6	46.7	75.0	70.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	47.4	40.0	25.0	30.0
2: Not very important (%)	21.1	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Very important (%)	21.1	26.7	37.5	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	52.6	53.3	37.5	40.0
2: Not very important (%)	15.8	20.0	25.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	10.5	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	21.1	46.7	62.5	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.6	20.0	37.5	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	31.6	20.0	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	15.8	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	.	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	33.3	50.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	33.3	12.5	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	33.3	37.5	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	.	12.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	26.3	46.7	25.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	63.2	13.3	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	40.0	12.5	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	6.7	.	10.0
3: Agree (%)	26.3	40.0	25.0	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	57.9	20.0	50.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	33.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.4	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.8	35.7	37.5	80.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	64.3	62.5	20.0
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	.
Total (N)	1	1

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.3	21.4	37.5	70.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.9	64.3	37.5	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	14.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	1.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	100.0	.
Total (N)	1	1	1

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	.	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	71.4	75.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	28.6	25.0	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	.	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.7	73.3	75.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	26.7	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.1	6.7	.	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	80.0	87.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	13.3	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.6	20.0	37.5	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	60.0	62.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.6	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	6.7	25.0	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	73.7	46.7	25.0	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	13.3	37.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	12.5	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.9	1.7	2.0	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	27.3	.	.	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	70.0	100.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	36.4	30.0	.	.
Total (N)	11	10	3	6

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	3.0	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	37.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	84.6	37.5	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	7.7	12.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	7.7	12.5	10.0
Total (N)	18	13	8	10

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	3.0	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.	37.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	50.0	37.5	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	42.9	12.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	7.1	12.5	40.0
Total (N)	18	14	8	10

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	4.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	100.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	.	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.	.
Total (N)	2	1	1

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	20.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	20.0	100.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	40.0	.	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	5	5	3	2

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.5	69.2	75.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	15.4	12.5	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	15.4	12.5	.
Total (N)	17	13	8	7

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.1	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	78.6	37.5	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	21.4	37.5	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	25.0	12.5
Total (N)	18	14	8	8

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.4	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.8	.	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.4	80.0	62.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	13.3	12.5	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	6.7	25.0	12.5
Total (N)	19	15	8	8

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.1	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	6.7	12.5	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	60.0	12.5	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	33.3	50.0	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	25.0	12.5
Total (N)	18	15	8	8

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	11.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	66.7	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	22.2	.	.
Total (N)	7	9	3	4

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	62.5	100.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	7	8	3	3

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	27.3	50.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	72.7	50.0	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	12	11	4	9

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	22.2	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	87.5	66.7	75.0	87.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.	25.0	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	8	9	4	8

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	85.7	100.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	33.3
Total (N)	3	7	2	3

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	66.7	100.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	50.0
Total (N)	6	6	2	2

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.3	2.8	2.0	2.7
4: A lot (%)	15.8	42.9	12.5	20.0
3: Some (%)	36.8	21.4	25.0	50.0
2: A little (%)	5.3	7.1	12.5	10.0
1: None at all (%)	42.1	28.6	50.0	20.0
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	1.9	2.4
4: Very likely (%)	21.1	40.0	.	20.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	26.3	20.0	37.5	20.0
2: Not very likely (%)	42.1	13.3	12.5	40.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	10.5	26.7	50.0	20.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.8	7.1	.	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.7	64.3	75.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	28.6	12.5	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	14.3	12.5	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	64.3	50.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	21.4	25.0	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	18	14	8	10

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	16.7	33.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	84.6	66.7	33.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	33.3	.
Total (N)	13	6	3	5

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	85.7	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	14.3	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	13	7	5	6

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.5	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	66.7	50.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	33.3	50.0	.
Total (N)	5	3	2	2

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	28.6	25.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	71.4	50.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	.	25.0	.
Total (N)	16	7	4	5

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	11.1	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	87.5	88.9	83.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	9	6	4

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.1	2.0
Once a week or more (%)	21.1	13.3	12.5	10.0
A few times a month (%)	15.8	.	12.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	5.3	20.0	.	.
Once a semester (%)	.	.	.	20.0
Once a year (%)	5.3	6.7	.	10.0
Never (%)	52.6	60.0	75.0	60.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8	2.0	2.1
Once a week or more (%)	5.3	6.7	12.5	.
A few times a month (%)	10.5	.	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	10.5	6.7	12.5	20.0
Once a semester (%)	21.1	6.7	.	20.0
Once a year (%)	5.3	13.3	.	10.0
Never (%)	47.4	66.7	75.0	50.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.1	1.1	1.0	1.3
A few times a semester (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Once a semester (%)	5.3	.	.	.
Once a year (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Never (%)	94.7	92.9	100.0	90.0
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	1.6	2.9
A few times a month (%)	.	13.3	.	10.0
A few times a semester (%)	42.1	6.7	.	40.0
Once a semester (%)	15.8	13.3	12.5	10.0
Once a year (%)	15.8	13.3	37.5	10.0
Never (%)	26.3	53.3	50.0	30.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	3.0	2.6
A few times a month (%)	15.8	.	12.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	26.3	20.0	25.0	30.0
Once a semester (%)	15.8	20.0	25.0	20.0
Once a year (%)	21.1	20.0	25.0	30.0
Never (%)	21.1	40.0	12.5	20.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.6	1.6
4: A great deal (%)	26.3	26.7	37.5	.
3: Some (%)	26.3	26.7	12.5	20.0
2: A little (%)	21.1	20.0	25.0	20.0
1: None at all (%)	26.3	26.7	25.0	60.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track (Any Rank)
Mean Rating	1.5	1.6	1.5	2.1
4: Very likely (%)	.	.	.	10.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	15.8	28.6	12.5	40.0
2: Not very likely (%)	15.8	7.1	25.0	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	68.4	64.3	62.5	50.0
Total (N)	19	14	8	10

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean # Hrs Work	52.6	54.3	55.0	36.8
more than 60 hrs (%)	16.7	13.3	12.5	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	22.2	26.7	37.5	.
41 to 50 hrs (%)	55.6	53.3	50.0	20.0
40 hrs or less (%)	5.6	6.7	.	80.0
Total (N)	18	15	8	10

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	36.3	38.4	38.5	65.7
more than 50% of time (%)	21.1	13.3	25.0	80.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	31.6	66.7	50.0	10.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	42.1	20.0	25.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.3	.	.	.
0% of time (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	5.3	.	.	11.1
Yes (%)	94.7	100.0	100.0	88.9
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	57.9	46.7	75.0	44.4
Yes (%)	42.1	53.3	25.0	55.6
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	42.1	20.0	50.0	55.6
Yes (%)	57.9	80.0	50.0	44.4
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	89.5	86.7	100.0	77.8
Yes (%)	10.5	13.3	.	22.2
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	36.8	80.0	62.5	100.0
Yes (%)	63.2	20.0	37.5	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	9

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.1	3.8	2.6	18.1
more than 50% of time (%)	.	.	.	10.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	10.5	6.7	.	30.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.3	13.3	.	20.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	63.2	66.7	100.0	40.0
0% of time (%)	21.1	13.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	15	8	10

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	13.3	23.1	12.5	70.0
Yes (%)	86.7	76.9	87.5	30.0
Total (N)	15	13	8	10

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
No (%)	66.7	30.8	25.0	30.0
Yes (%)	33.3	69.2	75.0	70.0
Total (N)	15	13	8	10

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	Full Professor (Tenure Track)	Associate Professor (Tenure Track)	Asst Prof/Instructor (Tenure Track)	Non-Tenure Track
Mean % of Time on Activity	30.6	35.1	50.0	2.5
more than 50% of time (%)	15.8	20.0	25.0	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	36.8	40.0	75.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)