North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Management
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	75.0	75.0
..... Yes (%)	25.0	25.0
Total (N)	40	16

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	57.5	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	15.0	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	6.7
Total (N)	40	15

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	12.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	31.6	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	12.5
Total (N)	38	16

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	57.9	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.2	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	5.3	.
4: Strong (%)	34.2	53.3
3: Average (%)	52.6	26.7
2: Weak (%)	7.9	13.3
1: Very weak (%)	.	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	5.1	6.7
4: Strong (%)	38.5	60.0
3: Average (%)	46.2	26.7
2: Weak (%)	10.3	6.7
Total (N)	39	15

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	2.6	.
4: Strong (%)	25.6	31.3
3: Average (%)	56.4	56.3
2: Weak (%)	15.4	12.5
Total (N)	39	16

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strong (%)	28.6	.
3: Average (%)	42.9	75.0
2: Weak (%)	28.6	25.0
Total (N)	7	4

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	7.4	23.1
4: Strong (%)	55.6	23.1
3: Average (%)	29.6	38.5
2: Weak (%)	7.4	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	15.4
Total (N)	27	13

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	9.1	7.7
4: Strong (%)	24.2	53.8
3: Average (%)	51.5	38.5
2: Weak (%)	9.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	33	13

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	.	8.3
4: Strong (%)	34.4	33.3
3: Average (%)	53.1	33.3
2: Weak (%)	9.4	16.7
1: Very weak (%)	3.1	8.3
Total (N)	32	12

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0
A (%)	.	6.3
B (%)	81.6	87.5
C (%)	15.8	6.3
D (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	16

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	4.3
A (%)	26.3	37.5
B (%)	60.5	56.3
C (%)	10.5	6.3
D (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	16

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	4.3
A (%)	20.5	37.5
B (%)	64.1	56.3
C (%)	15.4	.
D (%)	.	6.3
Total (N)	39	16

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	4.4
A (%)	15.4	43.8
B (%)	53.8	50.0
C (%)	28.2	6.3
D (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	16

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.4
A (%)	31.6	43.8
B (%)	65.8	56.3
C (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	16

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.3
A (%)	42.1	31.3
B (%)	50.0	68.8
C (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	38	16

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	30.8	37.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	38.5	31.3
No clear vision (%)	28.2	31.3
Not familiar (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	16

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	27.3
3: Agree (%)	59.3	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	27	11

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	28.2	43.8
Vision with slow progress (%)	41.0	56.3
No clear vision (%)	28.2	.
Not familiar (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	16

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	48.7	62.5
Change for the worse (%)	20.5	18.8
Not really change (%)	30.8	18.8
Total (N)	39	16

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	44.7	68.8
Change for the worse (%)	23.7	.
Not really change (%)	31.6	31.3
Total (N)	38	16

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	35.9	43.8
Change for the worse (%)	7.7	.
Not really change (%)	56.4	56.3
Total (N)	39	16

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	36.8	.
3: Good (%)	34.2	43.8
2: Fair (%)	23.7	31.3
1: Poor (%)	5.3	25.0
Total (N)	38	16

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	39.5	25.0
3: Good (%)	36.8	37.5
2: Fair (%)	13.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	12.5
Total (N)	38	16

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	42.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	28.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	18.4	25.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	12.5
Total (N)	38	16

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	36.8	6.3
3: Good (%)	47.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	5.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	18.8
Total (N)	38	16

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	47.4	20.0
3: Good (%)	39.5	60.0
2: Fair (%)	5.3	.
1: Poor (%)	7.9	20.0
Total (N)	38	15

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	21.6	.
3: Good (%)	35.1	40.0
2: Fair (%)	32.4	26.7
1: Poor (%)	10.8	33.3
Total (N)	37	15

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	23.7	13.3
3: Good (%)	44.7	20.0
2: Fair (%)	18.4	40.0
1: Poor (%)	13.2	26.7
Total (N)	38	15

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	24.3	.
3: Good (%)	43.2	33.3
2: Fair (%)	16.2	33.3
1: Poor (%)	16.2	33.3
Total (N)	37	15

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	5.4	.
3: Good (%)	51.4	56.3
2: Fair (%)	32.4	25.0
1: Poor (%)	10.8	18.8
Total (N)	37	16

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	13.9	6.3
3: Good (%)	55.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	19.4	18.8
1: Poor (%)	11.1	37.5
Total (N)	36	16

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	32.4	20.0
3: Good (%)	48.6	40.0
2: Fair (%)	16.2	20.0
1: Poor (%)	2.7	20.0
Total (N)	37	15

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	54.1	35.7
3: Good (%)	35.1	35.7
2: Fair (%)	5.4	14.3
1: Poor (%)	5.4	14.3
Total (N)	37	14

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	35.1	13.3
3: Good (%)	37.8	46.7
2: Fair (%)	21.6	20.0
1: Poor (%)	5.4	20.0
Total (N)	37	15

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	22.2	6.7
3: Good (%)	47.2	40.0
2: Fair (%)	16.7	20.0
1: Poor (%)	13.9	33.3
Total (N)	36	15

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	7.1
3: Good (%)	40.6	42.9
2: Fair (%)	12.5	35.7
1: Poor (%)	9.4	14.3
Total (N)	32	14

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	10.3	.
3: Good (%)	51.3	68.8
2: Fair (%)	25.6	31.3
1: Poor (%)	12.8	.
Total (N)	39	16

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	18.4	18.8
3: Good (%)	36.8	62.5
2: Fair (%)	28.9	12.5
1: Poor (%)	15.8	6.3
Total (N)	38	16

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	13.2	12.5
3: Good (%)	26.3	56.3
2: Fair (%)	42.1	18.8
1: Poor (%)	18.4	12.5
Total (N)	38	16

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	13.2	18.8
3: Good (%)	42.1	50.0
2: Fair (%)	31.6	18.8
1: Poor (%)	13.2	12.5
Total (N)	38	16

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	13.2	12.5
3: Good (%)	31.6	68.8
2: Fair (%)	42.1	18.8
1: Poor (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	38	16

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	.
3: Good (%)	36.8	35.7
2: Fair (%)	28.9	42.9
1: Poor (%)	23.7	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	7.7
3: Good (%)	29.4	38.5
2: Fair (%)	35.3	38.5
1: Poor (%)	29.4	15.4
Total (N)	34	13

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	2.6	.
3: Good (%)	35.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	46.2	37.5
1: Poor (%)	15.4	12.5
Total (N)	39	16

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.6	.
3: Good (%)	41.7	46.7
2: Fair (%)	36.1	26.7
1: Poor (%)	16.7	26.7
Total (N)	36	15

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	12.9	26.7
3: Good (%)	61.3	60.0
2: Fair (%)	9.7	6.7
1: Poor (%)	16.1	6.7
Total (N)	31	15

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	26.5	21.4
3: Good (%)	61.8	71.4
2: Fair (%)	8.8	.
1: Poor (%)	2.9	7.1
Total (N)	34	14

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	6.7
3: Good (%)	52.8	80.0
2: Fair (%)	19.4	6.7
1: Poor (%)	16.7	6.7
Total (N)	36	15

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	8.8	.
3: Good (%)	41.2	64.3
2: Fair (%)	35.3	28.6
1: Poor (%)	14.7	7.1
Total (N)	34	14

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	29.0	15.4
3: Good (%)	41.9	53.8
2: Fair (%)	22.6	23.1
1: Poor (%)	6.5	7.7
Total (N)	31	13

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	5.7	.
3: Good (%)	42.9	26.7
2: Fair (%)	37.1	46.7
1: Poor (%)	14.3	26.7
Total (N)	35	15

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	3.7	.
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	37.0	58.3
1: Poor (%)	25.9	16.7
Total (N)	27	12

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	7.1
3: Good (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	20.0	21.4
1: Poor (%)	23.3	21.4
Total (N)	30	14

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	8.3
3: Good (%)	57.7	33.3
2: Fair (%)	15.4	41.7
1: Poor (%)	11.5	16.7
Total (N)	26	12

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	6.7
3: Good (%)	70.6	80.0
2: Fair (%)	14.7	.
1: Poor (%)	2.9	13.3
Total (N)	34	15

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	.
3: Good (%)	60.7	58.3
2: Fair (%)	21.4	33.3
1: Poor (%)	10.7	8.3
Total (N)	28	12

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	3.7	.
3: Good (%)	63.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.1	25.0
Total (N)	27	12

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	20.7	15.4
3: Good (%)	51.7	46.2
2: Fair (%)	20.7	30.8
1: Poor (%)	6.9	7.7
Total (N)	29	13

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	46.2	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	12.5
Total (N)	39	16

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	31.3
3: Agree (%)	52.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	12.5
Total (N)	38	16

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.4	31.3
3: Agree (%)	30.8	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	12.5
Total (N)	39	16

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.6	18.8
3: Agree (%)	61.5	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	18.8
Total (N)	39	16

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.9	6.3
3: Agree (%)	42.1	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.8	43.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.2	25.0
Total (N)	38	16

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very familiar (%)	23.7	25.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	52.6	56.3
2: Not very familiar (%)	15.8	12.5
1: Not at all familiar (%)	7.9	6.3
Total (N)	38	16

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Very well (%)	2.6	18.8
3: Fairly well (%)	38.5	18.8
2: Not very well (%)	33.3	56.3
1: Not at all (%)	25.6	6.3
Total (N)	39	16

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.6
4: Very well (%)	.	18.8
3: Fairly well (%)	35.9	18.8
2: Not very well (%)	43.6	62.5
1: Not at all (%)	20.5	.
Total (N)	39	16

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Very well (%)	2.6	18.8
3: Fairly well (%)	51.3	43.8
2: Not very well (%)	33.3	31.3
1: Not at all (%)	12.8	6.3
Total (N)	39	16

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very well (%)	25.6	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	48.7	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	20.5	12.5
1: Not at all (%)	5.1	12.5
Total (N)	39	16

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	41.0	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	38.5	31.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	25.0
Total (N)	39	16

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.7	31.3
3: Agree (%)	46.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	6.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	12.5
Total (N)	39	16

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	48.7	20.0
3: Good (%)	33.3	46.7
2: Fair (%)	10.3	13.3
1: Poor (%)	7.7	20.0
Total (N)	39	15

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	12.5
3: Good (%)	46.2	56.3
2: Fair (%)	28.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	17.9	6.3
Total (N)	39	16

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	.
3: Good (%)	45.8	60.0
2: Fair (%)	33.3	40.0
1: Poor (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	24	10

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	4.5	.
3: Good (%)	54.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	36.4	66.7
1: Poor (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	22	6

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	14.3
3: Agree (%)	42.3	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	19.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	30.8	.
Total (N)	26	7

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	32.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	24.0	.
Total (N)	25	7

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.9	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.6	.
Total (N)	27	6

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	29.4	20.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	47.1	60.0
2: Not very effective (%)	17.6	20.0
1: Not at all effective (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	17	5

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
4: Very important (%)	39.5	62.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	34.2	37.5
2: Not very important (%)	23.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	16

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	15.8	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	50.0	26.7
2: Not very important (%)	18.4	.
1: Not at all important (%)	15.8	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	3.3
4: Very important (%)	5.3	53.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	44.7	26.7
2: Not very important (%)	26.3	13.3
1: Not at all important (%)	23.7	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	15.4
3: Agree (%)	74.3	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	5.7	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	7.7
Total (N)	35	13

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.2	41.7
3: Agree (%)	69.2	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	16.7
Total (N)	26	12

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.0	9.1
3: Agree (%)	64.0	27.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.0	45.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	18.2
Total (N)	25	11

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	68.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	20.0
Total (N)	25	10

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.1	27.3
3: Agree (%)	56.3	27.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	18.2
Total (N)	32	11

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	58.1	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.2	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	16.7
Total (N)	31	12

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.8	27.3
3: Agree (%)	44.8	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.9	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	18.2
Total (N)	29	11

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.8	16.7
3: Agree (%)	40.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	37	12

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	67.9	44.4
3: Agree (%)	32.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	22.2
Total (N)	28	9

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.8	23.1
3: Agree (%)	32.4	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	34	13

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	21	6

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	25.0
3: Agree (%)	37.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	35	12

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	23.1
3: Agree (%)	31.4	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	35	13

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.6	30.0
3: Agree (%)	28.1	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	10.0
Total (N)	32	10

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.9	12.5
3: Agree (%)	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	21	8

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.9	30.8
3: Agree (%)	36.1	61.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	36	13

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	30.0	55.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	30	9

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.6	30.8
3: Agree (%)	31.4	61.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	35	13

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.9	22.2
3: Agree (%)	26.1	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	23	9

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.4	30.8
3: Agree (%)	30.6	61.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	36	13

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.4	30.8
3: Agree (%)	30.6	61.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	36	13

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	28.6	58.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	35	12

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.9	20.0
3: Agree (%)	26.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	23	10

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	2.7	7.7
3: Some (%)	32.4	69.2
2: A little (%)	27.0	7.7
1: Not at all (%)	37.8	15.4
Total (N)	37	13

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	2.6	15.4
3: Some (%)	18.4	38.5
2: A little (%)	36.8	23.1
1: Not at all (%)	42.1	23.1
Total (N)	38	13

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	36.8	28.6
3: Some (%)	28.9	21.4
2: A little (%)	23.7	7.1
1: None (%)	10.5	42.9
Total (N)	38	14

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	31.6	35.7
3: Some (%)	31.6	42.9
2: A little (%)	18.4	.
1: None (%)	18.4	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	5.3	.
3: Some (%)	13.2	28.6
2: A little (%)	18.4	28.6
1: None (%)	63.2	42.9
Total (N)	38	14

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	10.5	7.1
3: Some (%)	13.2	42.9
2: A little (%)	31.6	14.3
1: None (%)	44.7	35.7
Total (N)	38	14

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	2.6	14.3
3: Some (%)	18.4	21.4
2: A little (%)	18.4	14.3
1: None (%)	60.5	50.0
Total (N)	38	14

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	5.4	14.3
3: Some (%)	24.3	7.1
2: A little (%)	32.4	35.7
1: None (%)	37.8	42.9
Total (N)	37	14

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	6.7
3: Agree (%)	39.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	20.0
Total (N)	38	15

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.4	60.0
3: Agree (%)	52.6	40.0
Total (N)	38	15

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.4	26.7
3: Agree (%)	71.1	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	38	15

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.9	6.7
3: Agree (%)	60.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.9	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	13.3
Total (N)	38	15

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.8	.
3: Agree (%)	47.2	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	36.1	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.9	15.4
Total (N)	36	13

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.2	.
3: Agree (%)	54.2	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	16.7
Total (N)	24	12

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.9	13.3
3: Agree (%)	57.9	73.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
Frequently (%)	31.6	13.3
Sometimes (%)	44.7	60.0
Seldom (%)	18.4	13.3
Never (%)	5.3	13.3
Total (N)	38	15

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6
Frequently (%)	52.6	20.0
Sometimes (%)	36.8	33.3
Seldom (%)	2.6	33.3
Never (%)	7.9	13.3
Total (N)	38	15

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
Frequently (%)	38.9	46.7
Sometimes (%)	47.2	40.0
Seldom (%)	13.9	13.3
Total (N)	36	15

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
Frequently (%)	40.5	20.0
Sometimes (%)	35.1	46.7
Seldom (%)	16.2	26.7
Never (%)	8.1	6.7
Total (N)	37	15

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1
Frequently (%)	5.6	13.3
Sometimes (%)	27.8	13.3
Seldom (%)	30.6	40.0
Never (%)	36.1	33.3
Total (N)	36	15

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
Frequently (%)	44.7	20.0
Sometimes (%)	36.8	46.7
Seldom (%)	13.2	26.7
Never (%)	5.3	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
Frequently (%)	21.1	20.0
Sometimes (%)	26.3	20.0
Seldom (%)	31.6	20.0
Never (%)	21.1	40.0
Total (N)	38	15

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
Frequently (%)	36.8	20.0
Sometimes (%)	44.7	46.7
Seldom (%)	2.6	26.7
Never (%)	15.8	6.7
Total (N)	38	15

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
Frequently (%)	13.2	6.7
Sometimes (%)	34.2	33.3
Seldom (%)	26.3	13.3
Never (%)	26.3	46.7
Total (N)	38	15

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	68.4	57.1
3: Satisfied (%)	31.6	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.7	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	44.7	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.6	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.9	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	57.9	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	36.8	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	76.3	64.3
3: Satisfied (%)	21.1	35.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.6	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	36.8	35.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	7.1
Total (N)	38	14

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	63.9	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	7.7
Total (N)	36	13

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	35	12

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.2	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	30.3	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.2	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.3	33.3
Total (N)	33	12

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.9	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	27.6	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.7	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	44.8	33.3
Total (N)	29	9

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	68.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.9	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3
Total (N)	38	15

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.4	28.6
3: Agree (%)	58.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	7.1
Total (N)	36	14

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	.
3: Agree (%)	71.4	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	75.0
Total (N)	7	4

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	30.0
3: Agree (%)	60.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	.
Total (N)	23	10

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.4	7.1
3: Agree (%)	59.5	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.8	28.6
Total (N)	37	14

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	51.4	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.4	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.2	7.1
Total (N)	37	14

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	44.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	66.7
Total (N)	9	3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	25.0
3: Agree (%)	52.2	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.7	25.0
Total (N)	23	8

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.3	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	26.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.9	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	15

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.6	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.3	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.9	40.0
Total (N)	31	10

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	36.4
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	30	11

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	55.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	22.2
Total (N)	30	9

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	61.8	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	34	14

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.6	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.1	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	32	12

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.4	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.1	20.0
Total (N)	35	10

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	41.9	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.6	42.9
Total (N)	31	7

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	31.0	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.0	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	31.0	42.9
Total (N)	29	7

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	78.9	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	10.0
Total (N)	19	10

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	36.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	27.3
Total (N)	24	11

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.8	26.7
3: Satisfied (%)	56.8	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.7	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.7	6.7
Total (N)	37	15

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	65.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.7	25.0
Total (N)	35	12

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	65.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.0	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	10.0
Total (N)	20	10

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	.	14.3
No (%)	100.0	85.7
Total (N)	38	14

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Female
Mean Rating	3.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	100.0
Total (N)	2

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	50.0
Total (N)	16	6

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	20.0
Total (N)	11	5

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	40.0
Total (N)	12	5

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	88.9	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	9	4

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	50.0
Total (N)	10	4

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	25.0
Total (N)	10	4

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	50.0
Total (N)	9	4

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	13.3
3: Agree (%)	63.2	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	26.7
Total (N)	38	15

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	47.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	20.0
Total (N)	38	15

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.6	22.2
3: Agree (%)	55.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	22.2
Total (N)	36	9

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	72.7	50.0
Total (N)	33	6

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.1	12.5
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.4	25.0
Total (N)	32	8

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	7.7
3: Agree (%)	54.3	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	30.8
Total (N)	35	13

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.1	7.7
3: Agree (%)	68.6	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	23.1
Total (N)	35	13

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.2	7.7
3: Agree (%)	48.5	23.1
2: Disagree (%)	21.2	38.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.2	30.8
Total (N)	33	13

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	7.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.6	38.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	15.4
Total (N)	34	13

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very well (%)	23.7	21.4
3: Fairly well (%)	47.4	42.9
2: Not very well (%)	26.3	28.6
1: Not at all (%)	2.6	7.1
Total (N)	38	14

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	28.9	53.3
Yes (%)	71.1	46.7
Total (N)	38	15

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	34.2	60.0
Yes (%)	65.8	40.0
Total (N)	38	15

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	44.7	60.0
Yes (%)	55.3	40.0
Total (N)	38	15

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	81.6	60.0
Yes (%)	18.4	40.0
Total (N)	38	15

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Very well (%)	52.6	28.6
3: Fairly well (%)	36.8	42.9
2: Not very well (%)	7.9	21.4
1: Not at all (%)	2.6	7.1
Total (N)	38	14

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Very well (%)	42.1	28.6
3: Fairly well (%)	42.1	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	10.5	21.4
1: Not at all (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	38	14

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	10.0
3: Agree (%)	28.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	40.0
Total (N)	35	10

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	11.1
3: Agree (%)	27.3	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	22.2
Total (N)	33	9

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	.
3: Agree (%)	65.7	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	7.7
Total (N)	35	13

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.7	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	69.2
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.7	15.4
Total (N)	28	13

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	66.7
Total (N)	5	3

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.0	.
3: Agree (%)	52.4	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.
Total (N)	21	11

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	.
3: Agree (%)	63.2	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	.
Total (N)	19	8

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.4	.
3: Agree (%)	55.6	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	29.6	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	18.2
Total (N)	27	11

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.2	7.7
3: Agree (%)	60.5	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	23.7	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	15.4
Total (N)	38	13

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	25.0
3: Agree (%)	56.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	30	8

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	.
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	50.0
Total (N)	6	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.0	.
3: Agree (%)	61.9	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	21	9

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	14.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	22.7	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.6	28.6
Total (N)	22	7

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	.
3: Agree (%)	56.3	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.1	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	40.0
Total (N)	32	10

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	70.6	50.0
No experience (%)	29.4	50.0
Total (N)	34	10

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	44.1	70.0
Yes (%)	55.9	30.0
Total (N)	34	10

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	44.1	50.0
Yes (%)	55.9	50.0
Total (N)	34	10

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	91.2	100.0
Yes (%)	8.8	.
Total (N)	34	10

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	94.1	100.0
Yes (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	34	10

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.9	20.0
3: Agree (%)	51.9	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	20.0
Total (N)	27	5

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	.
3: Agree (%)	54.2	16.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	16.7
Total (N)	24	6

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.2	.
3: Agree (%)	54.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	16.7
Total (N)	24	6

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.0	.
3: Agree (%)	52.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	16.7
Total (N)	25	6

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.8	.
3: Agree (%)	59.1	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	20.0
Total (N)	22	5

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.4	.
3: Agree (%)	60.9	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	20.0
Total (N)	23	5

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.
3: Agree (%)	35.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	20.0
Total (N)	20	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.7	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	56.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	16.7
Total (N)	23	6

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.9	.
3: Agree (%)	48.4	23.1
2: Disagree (%)	29.0	46.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.7	30.8
Total (N)	31	13

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.6	.
3: Agree (%)	42.9	30.8
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.7	38.5
Total (N)	28	13

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	.
3: Agree (%)	73.7	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	18.2
Total (N)	19	11

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.7	.
3: Agree (%)	34.8	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	47.8	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	33.3
Total (N)	23	12

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.0	.
3: Agree (%)	15.2	21.4
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.4	42.9
Total (N)	33	14

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very well (%)	21.1	21.4
3: Fairly well (%)	57.9	71.4
2: Not very well (%)	18.4	7.1
1: Not at all (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.4	.
3: Agree (%)	47.1	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	8.3
Total (N)	34	12

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.5	35.7
3: Agree (%)	55.3	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.9	8.3
3: Agree (%)	20.6	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	32.4	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	44.1	33.3
Total (N)	34	12

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	8.3
3: Agree (%)	34.4	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	21.9	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	37.5	25.0
Total (N)	32	12

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.0	8.3
3: Agree (%)	52.0	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.0	25.0
Total (N)	25	12

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	7.1
3: Agree (%)	39.5	21.4
2: Disagree (%)	39.5	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.1	35.7
Total (N)	38	14

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.2	7.1
3: Agree (%)	63.2	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	7.1
3: Agree (%)	75.7	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.7	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	37	14

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.9
4: Very important (%)	51.4	85.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.2	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	2.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.7	.
Total (N)	37	14

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.9
4: Very important (%)	36.8	92.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	55.3	7.1
2: Not very important (%)	5.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.9
4: Very important (%)	32.4	85.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	51.4	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	13.5	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.7	.
Total (N)	37	14

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.9
4: Very important (%)	36.8	85.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	47.4	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	15.8	.
Total (N)	38	14

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.6
4: Very important (%)	18.4	64.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	52.6	35.7
2: Not very important (%)	21.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	38	14

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Very important (%)	34.2	57.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	34.2	28.6
2: Not very important (%)	18.4	14.3
1: Not at all important (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	38	14

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	7.1
3: Agree (%)	57.9	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	28.6
Total (N)	38	14

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.9	7.1
3: Agree (%)	36.8	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	42.1	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.2	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.9	.
3: Agree (%)	36.8	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	39.5	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.9	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	54.1	57.1
Total (N)	37	14

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	.
Total (N)	1	1

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.7	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	54.1	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.2	7.1
Total (N)	37	14

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.
Total (N)	2	1

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.4	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.6	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	37	14

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	76.3	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	35.7
3: Satisfied (%)	73.7	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.6	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.3	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	60.5	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.5	15.4
Total (N)	38	13

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	20.0
Total (N)	20	10

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.4	30.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	7.7
Total (N)	36	13

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	43.2	23.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.7	53.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.2	23.1
Total (N)	37	13

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	.
Total (N)	2	2

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.2	.
Total (N)	11	4

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	78.1	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.4	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	7.7
Total (N)	32	13

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	64.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	7.1
Total (N)	34	14

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.9	7.1
Total (N)	36	14

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	51.4	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.3	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	7.1
Total (N)	35	14

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	93.3	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	12.5
Total (N)	15	8

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	92.9	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	14	7

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	86.4	78.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	22	14

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	78.9	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	10

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	100.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	9	6

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	90.9	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	11	5

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: A lot (%)	23.7	23.1
3: Some (%)	28.9	46.2
2: A little (%)	7.9	7.7
1: None at all (%)	39.5	23.1
Total (N)	38	13

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very likely (%)	23.7	21.4
3: Somewhat likely (%)	26.3	21.4
2: Not very likely (%)	31.6	21.4
1: Not at all likely (%)	18.4	35.7
Total (N)	38	14

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.8	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	73.0	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.5	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.7	.
Total (N)	37	14

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.3	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.9	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	36	14

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	81.8	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.5	20.0
Total (N)	22	5

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	84.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	25	6

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
3: Satisfied (%)	88.9	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	33.3
Total (N)	9	3

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.
Total (N)	24	8

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	85.7	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	28	7

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	1.9
Once a week or more (%)	18.4	7.1
A few times a month (%)	10.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	7.9	7.1
Once a semester (%)	2.6	7.1
Once a year (%)	.	21.4
Never (%)	60.5	57.1
Total (N)	38	14

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
Once a week or more (%)	7.9	.
A few times a month (%)	5.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	7.9	21.4
Once a semester (%)	13.2	14.3
Once a year (%)	10.5	.
Never (%)	55.3	64.3
Total (N)	38	14

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.1	1.3
A few times a semester (%)	.	7.7
Once a semester (%)	2.6	.
Once a year (%)	.	7.7
Never (%)	97.4	84.6
Total (N)	38	13

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9
A few times a month (%)	5.3	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	23.7	28.6
Once a semester (%)	10.5	21.4
Once a year (%)	13.2	28.6
Never (%)	47.4	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
A few times a month (%)	10.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	21.1	35.7
Once a semester (%)	21.1	14.3
Once a year (%)	21.1	28.6
Never (%)	26.3	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	26.3	14.3
3: Some (%)	23.7	21.4
2: A little (%)	18.4	28.6
1: None at all (%)	31.6	35.7
Total (N)	38	14

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.6
4: Very likely (%)	2.7	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	21.6	28.6
2: Not very likely (%)	16.2	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	59.5	71.4
Total (N)	37	14

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	50.5	50.2
more than 60 hrs (%)	10.8	14.3
51 to 60 hrs (%)	21.6	21.4
41 to 50 hrs (%)	54.1	28.6
40 hrs or less (%)	13.5	35.7
Total (N)	37	14

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	40.7	48.9
more than 50% of time (%)	28.9	35.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	39.5	42.9
11% to 25% of time (%)	28.9	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.6	.
0% of time (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	38	14

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	2.6	7.7
Yes (%)	97.4	92.3
Total (N)	38	13

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	57.9	46.2
Yes (%)	42.1	53.8
Total (N)	38	13

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	34.2	53.8
Yes (%)	65.8	46.2
Total (N)	38	13

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	86.8	92.3
Yes (%)	13.2	7.7
Total (N)	38	13

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	52.6	100.0
Yes (%)	47.4	.
Total (N)	38	13

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.9	12.1
more than 50% of time (%)	.	7.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	10.5	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.3	21.4
1% to 5% of time (%)	71.1	50.0
0% of time (%)	13.2	7.1
Total (N)	38	14

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	27.3	30.8
Yes (%)	72.7	69.2
Total (N)	33	13

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	48.5	23.1
Yes (%)	51.5	76.9
Total (N)	33	13

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	33.2	19.5
more than 50% of time (%)	18.4	7.1
26% to 50% of time (%)	42.1	21.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	21.1	28.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.3	7.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	2.6	.
0% of time (%)	10.5	35.7
Total (N)	38	14

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.0	0.0
0% of time (%)	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	38	14

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	3.3	1.1
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.3	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.6	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.6	7.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	15.8	14.3
0% of time (%)	73.7	78.6
Total (N)	38	14

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	80.0	66.7
Yes (%)	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	70.0	66.7
Yes (%)	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	90.0	66.7
Yes (%)	10.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	60.0	66.7
Yes (%)	40.0	33.3
Total (N)	10	3

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	100.0	100.0
Total (N)	10	3

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.8	11.9
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.3	7.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	28.9	35.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	15.8	14.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	39.5	21.4
0% of time (%)	10.5	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	73.5	45.5
Yes (%)	26.5	54.5
Total (N)	34	11

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	14.7	9.1
Yes (%)	85.3	90.9
Total (N)	34	11

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	41.2	27.3
Yes (%)	58.8	72.7
Total (N)	34	11

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	73.5	63.6
Yes (%)	26.5	36.4
Total (N)	34	11

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	76.5	54.5
Yes (%)	23.5	45.5
Total (N)	34	11

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.7	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	2.6	.
0% of time (%)	94.7	100.0
Total (N)	38	14

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.6	6.4
more than 50% of time (%)	5.3	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	2.6	7.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.6	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.9	7.1
0% of time (%)	78.9	71.4
Total (N)	38	14

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	42.1	28.6
Yes (%)	57.9	71.4
Total (N)	38	14

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	68.4	57.1
Yes (%)	31.6	42.9
Total (N)	38	14

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	97.4	71.4
Yes (%)	2.6	28.6
Total (N)	38	14

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	76.3	78.6
Yes (%)	23.7	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	34.2	64.3
Yes (%)	65.8	35.7
Total (N)	38	14

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	55.3	50.0
Yes (%)	44.7	50.0
Total (N)	38	14

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	97.4	100.0
Yes (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	23.7	.
A few times (%)	39.5	28.6
About once per month (%)	15.8	7.1
Two or three times per month (%)	10.5	35.7
At least once per week (%)	10.5	28.6
Total (N)	38	14

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	47.4	71.4
Once or twice (%)	31.6	28.6
Three to five times (%)	7.9	.
Six to ten times (%)	5.3	.
More than 10 times (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	38	14

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	21.1	7.1
2 (%)	28.9	7.1
3 (%)	31.6	42.9
4 (%)	13.2	28.6
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	5.3	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	60.6	61.5
I would not change a thing (%)	39.4	38.5
Total (N)	33	13

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.8	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.5	7.1
3: Agree (%)	44.7	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.6	42.9
3: Agree (%)	47.4	57.1
Total (N)	38	14

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.8	57.1
3: Agree (%)	31.6	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	14

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.4	28.6
3: Agree (%)	50.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	78.6
2: Disagree (%)	13.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	7.1
Total (N)	36	14

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.2	14.3
3: Agree (%)	47.4	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	17.6	53.8
3: Some (%)	23.5	30.8
2: A little (%)	17.6	7.7
1: None at all (%)	41.2	7.7
Total (N)	34	13

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	25.7	70.0
3: Some (%)	37.1	30.0
2: A little (%)	25.7	.
1: None at all (%)	11.4	.
Total (N)	35	10

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	.	7.7
3: Some (%)	31.4	53.8
2: A little (%)	31.4	38.5
1: None at all (%)	37.1	.
Total (N)	35	13

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	8.3
3: Some (%)	28.1	33.3
2: A little (%)	28.1	41.7
1: None at all (%)	31.3	16.7
Total (N)	32	12

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	11.1	35.7
3: Some (%)	30.6	28.6
2: A little (%)	30.6	21.4
1: None at all (%)	27.8	14.3
Total (N)	36	14

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1
3: Some (%)	21.1	35.7
2: A little (%)	28.9	35.7
1: None at all (%)	50.0	28.6
Total (N)	38	14

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	7.9	14.3
3: Some (%)	18.4	35.7
2: A little (%)	34.2	42.9
1: None at all (%)	39.5	7.1
Total (N)	38	14

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	2.6	28.6
3: Some (%)	28.9	35.7
2: A little (%)	26.3	14.3
1: None at all (%)	42.1	21.4
Total (N)	38	14

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	5.4	7.1
3: Some (%)	35.1	42.9
2: A little (%)	21.6	21.4
1: None at all (%)	37.8	28.6
Total (N)	37	14

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	42.9
3: Some (%)	33.3	50.0
2: A little (%)	25.0	.
1: None at all (%)	16.7	7.1
Total (N)	36	14

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.4
4: A great deal (%)	27.8	50.0
3: Some (%)	19.4	42.9
2: A little (%)	33.3	.
1: None at all (%)	19.4	7.1
Total (N)	36	14

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	5.7	.
3: Some (%)	42.9	57.1
2: A little (%)	34.3	35.7
1: None at all (%)	17.1	7.1
Total (N)	35	14

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	.	7.7
3: Some (%)	25.0	30.8
2: A little (%)	33.3	30.8
1: None at all (%)	41.7	30.8
Total (N)	36	13

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	11.1	25.0
3: Some (%)	22.2	33.3
2: A little (%)	22.2	25.0
1: None at all (%)	44.4	16.7
Total (N)	27	12

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.9	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
A lot more satisfied now (%)	2.6	7.1
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	26.3	14.3
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	34.2	21.4
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	21.1	28.6
A lot less satisfied now (%)	15.8	28.6
Total (N)	38	14

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	7.9	7.1
Yes - not very seriously (%)	21.1	35.7
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	39.5	21.4
Yes - very seriously (%)	31.6	35.7
Total (N)	38	14

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	47.4	50.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	39.5	28.6
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	10.5	7.1
Yes - very seriously (%)	2.6	14.3
Total (N)	38	14

Back to top

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

Return to COM Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page