NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey
Section G: Faculty Support and Professional Development

College Results
Tenure Track Faculty
(Tenured and Probationary)


The following tables provide results to questions in Section G: Faculty Support and Professional Development, broken down by college for tenure track faculty only. For exact question wording for this section, click here.

Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | College Results for all Faculty


To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section G only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.


G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.4 49.0 44.8 4.5 1.7 804

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.4 48.7 47.6 3.2 0.5 187
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 47.6 45.2 7.1 . 42
..... CHASS 3.4 50.7 41.9 6.8 0.7 148
..... CNR 3.2 37.5 47.5 7.5 7.5 40
..... COE 3.4 43.0 52.6 3.0 1.5 135
..... COM 3.6 67.4 27.9 . 4.7 43
..... COT 3.2 44.0 40.0 12.0 4.0 25
..... CVM 3.5 50.0 48.3 1.7 . 60
..... Design 3.5 60.9 34.8 . 4.3 23
..... PAMS 3.4 49.5 42.1 5.3 3.2 95
..... Student Affairs 4.0 100.0 . . . 4
Back to Top

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.2 37.6 47.3 12.6 2.5 811

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 41.1 50.0 7.9 1.1 190
..... CALS
..... CED 3.3 41.9 48.8 9.3 . 43
..... CHASS 3.1 37.2 37.8 20.3 4.7 148
..... CNR 3.1 25.0 60.0 12.5 2.5 40
..... COE 3.2 35.8 51.8 11.7 0.7 137
..... COM 3.1 41.9 41.9 4.7 11.6 43
..... COT 3.0 30.8 38.5 30.8 . 26
..... CVM 3.3 39.3 55.7 4.9 . 61
..... Design 3.1 47.8 26.1 17.4 8.7 23
..... PAMS 3.2 35.1 47.9 14.9 2.1 94
..... Student Affairs 3.0 25.0 50.0 25.0 . 4
Back to Top

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.4 54.3 38.2 5.3 2.2 811

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.5 60.6 34.0 3.7 1.6 188
..... CALS
..... CED 3.5 58.1 34.9 4.7 2.3 43
..... CHASS 3.6 68.9 27.7 2.7 0.7 148
..... CNR 3.4 55.0 30.0 10.0 5.0 40
..... COE 3.3 40.9 49.6 7.3 2.2 137
..... COM 3.4 60.5 27.9 7.0 4.7 43
..... COT 3.1 34.6 42.3 19.2 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.3 40.3 53.2 4.8 1.6 62
..... Design 3.4 56.5 30.4 8.7 4.3 23
..... PAMS 3.4 48.4 45.3 3.2 3.2 95
..... Student Affairs 3.3 25.0 75.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.7 70.6 27.0 2.1 0.4 812

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.8 77.7 19.7 2.7 . 188
..... CALS
..... CED 3.6 65.1 27.9 7.0 . 43
..... CHASS 3.8 83.1 16.2 . 0.7 148
..... CNR 3.7 75.0 22.5 . 2.5 40
..... COE 3.6 57.2 41.3 0.7 0.7 138
..... COM 3.8 79.1 18.6 2.3 . 43
..... COT 3.5 61.5 30.8 7.7 . 26
..... CVM 3.6 66.1 30.6 3.2 . 62
..... Design 3.8 82.6 17.4 . . 23
..... PAMS 3.5 57.9 38.9 3.2 . 95
..... Student Affairs 3.3 25.0 75.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.2 36.5 48.3 12.4 2.8 812

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 41.0 50.5 7.4 1.1 188
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 51.2 39.5 7.0 2.3 43
..... CHASS 3.0 31.8 43.2 20.3 4.7 148
..... CNR 3.2 47.5 30.0 17.5 5.0 40
..... COE 3.1 28.3 52.2 16.7 2.9 138
..... COM 2.9 27.9 39.5 25.6 7.0 43
..... COT 3.4 46.2 46.2 7.7 . 26
..... CVM 3.4 38.7 58.1 3.2 . 62
..... Design 3.4 56.5 34.8 4.3 4.3 23
..... PAMS 3.2 31.6 56.8 8.4 3.2 95
..... Student Affairs 3.3 25.0 75.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.9 15.8 58.2 21.4 4.6 710

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 14.1 60.7 20.2 4.9 163
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 31.8 40.9 27.3 . 22
..... CHASS 2.8 14.4 55.5 26.0 4.1 146
..... CNR 2.7 9.8 61.0 19.5 9.8 41
..... COE 2.8 9.0 65.7 20.9 4.5 134
..... COM 2.7 10.0 60.0 22.5 7.5 40
..... COT 3.2 26.9 65.4 7.7 . 26
..... CVM 3.0 22.2 55.6 22.2 . 18
..... Design 3.7 69.6 26.1 4.3 . 23
..... PAMS 2.8 13.3 55.6 24.4 6.7 90
..... Student Affairs 3.4 40.0 60.0 . . 5
Back to Top

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 23.9 62.2 12.4 1.5 823

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.2 27.1 63.8 7.8 1.4 218
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 22.7 54.5 20.5 2.3 44
..... CHASS 3.1 28.0 56.8 14.4 0.8 125
..... CNR 3.1 31.3 52.1 8.3 8.3 48
..... COE 3.1 18.5 69.6 11.9 . 135
..... COM 3.0 19.0 64.3 11.9 4.8 42
..... COT 3.3 30.8 65.4 3.8 . 26
..... CVM 3.0 16.4 68.9 14.8 . 61
..... Design 3.3 43.5 43.5 13.0 . 23
..... PAMS 2.9 16.8 62.1 20.0 1.1 95
..... Student Affairs 3.3 25.0 75.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 15.9 45.7 23.9 14.5 674

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 16.4 54.1 21.4 8.2 159
..... CALS
..... CED 2.0 5.1 15.4 51.3 28.2 39
..... CHASS 2.4 18.1 30.5 29.5 21.9 105
..... CNR 2.7 20.0 45.0 22.5 12.5 40
..... COE 2.9 17.6 56.6 22.8 2.9 136
..... COM 2.2 13.9 27.8 19.4 38.9 36
..... COT 2.4 13.6 36.4 27.3 22.7 22
..... CVM 2.1 4.2 33.3 29.2 33.3 24
..... Design 2.2 10.0 40.0 10.0 40.0 20
..... PAMS 2.9 18.7 59.3 15.4 6.6 91
Back to Top

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 15.8 44.2 23.2 16.8 715

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 16.2 52.3 20.8 10.7 197
..... CALS
..... CED 2.0 4.5 20.5 43.2 31.8 44
..... CHASS 2.0 9.3 17.5 36.1 37.1 97
..... CNR 2.8 20.5 47.7 20.5 11.4 44
..... COE 3.0 24.3 55.1 19.1 1.5 136
..... COM 2.1 10.8 27.0 18.9 43.2 37
..... COT 2.7 12.0 56.0 24.0 8.0 25
..... CVM 2.1 5.9 32.4 29.4 32.4 34
..... Design 2.3 10.0 45.0 5.0 40.0 20
..... PAMS 3.0 21.5 58.2 15.2 5.1 79
Back to Top

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 29.9 56.6 9.5 4.0 832

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.2 33.2 60.0 4.1 2.7 220
..... CALS
..... CED 3.2 36.4 50.0 11.4 2.3 44
..... CHASS 3.0 22.9 57.1 14.3 5.7 140
..... CNR 3.3 45.7 45.7 6.5 2.2 46
..... COE 3.1 27.8 55.6 13.5 3.0 133
..... COM 3.1 23.3 65.1 7.0 4.7 43
..... COT 3.2 26.9 65.4 3.8 3.8 26
..... CVM 3.2 37.3 50.8 6.8 5.1 59
..... Design 2.7 17.4 47.8 17.4 17.4 23
..... PAMS 3.1 27.5 58.2 12.1 2.2 91
..... Student Affairs 3.4 40.0 60.0 . . 5
Back to Top

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 32.6 51.2 13.5 2.8 854

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.2 37.3 49.8 11.6 1.2 241
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 47.7 43.2 6.8 2.3 44
..... CHASS 2.9 18.8 55.8 21.0 4.3 138
..... CNR 3.2 35.4 54.2 4.2 6.3 48
..... COE 3.1 32.8 49.6 13.9 3.6 137
..... COM 2.9 17.1 56.1 22.0 4.9 41
..... COT 3.2 30.8 57.7 11.5 . 26
..... CVM 3.3 40.3 46.8 11.3 1.6 62
..... Design 3.0 34.8 43.5 13.0 8.7 23
..... PAMS 3.2 34.5 51.7 13.8 . 87
..... Student Affairs 3.2 20.0 80.0 . . 5
Back to Top

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.9 23.8 48.1 20.9 7.2 235

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.2 39.7 48.3 8.6 3.4 58
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 40.0 13.3 40.0 6.7 15
..... CHASS 2.6 14.0 44.0 32.0 10.0 50
..... CNR 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 15
..... COE 2.9 14.8 63.0 18.5 3.7 27
..... COM 3.1 28.6 57.1 14.3 . 7
..... COT 3.1 42.9 42.9 . 14.3 7
..... CVM 3.0 27.3 54.5 9.1 9.1 11
..... Design 2.5 9.1 45.5 31.8 13.6 22
..... PAMS 2.8 27.8 38.9 22.2 11.1 18
..... Student Affairs 3.3 33.3 66.7 . . 3
Back to Top

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 28.9 56.7 10.2 4.2 626

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 39.1 51.0 6.8 3.1 192
..... CALS
..... CED 3.2 36.8 50.0 7.9 5.3 38
..... CHASS 2.8 18.3 57.0 15.1 9.7 93
..... CNR 3.1 35.1 45.9 13.5 5.4 37
..... COE 3.0 16.8 66.3 13.9 3.0 101
..... COM 2.9 16.0 68.0 8.0 8.0 25
..... COT 3.2 22.7 77.3 . . 22
..... CVM 3.2 34.8 54.3 8.7 2.2 46
..... Design 3.4 45.5 50.0 . 4.5 22
..... PAMS 3.0 20.5 63.6 15.9 . 44
..... Student Affairs 3.3 25.0 75.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 12.8 51.0 25.8 10.4 811

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 16.3 55.0 19.1 9.6 209
..... CALS
..... CED 2.7 14.6 53.7 22.0 9.8 41
..... CHASS 2.6 8.0 51.4 28.3 12.3 138
..... CNR 2.6 8.9 51.1 26.7 13.3 45
..... COE 2.6 8.5 50.8 30.8 10.0 130
..... COM 2.5 4.8 57.1 26.2 11.9 42
..... COT 2.9 26.1 43.5 21.7 8.7 23
..... CVM 2.8 20.6 46.0 27.0 6.3 63
..... Design 2.5 13.0 39.1 30.4 17.4 23
..... PAMS 2.7 15.6 46.7 28.9 8.9 90
..... Student Affairs 2.6 . 60.0 40.0 . 5
Back to Top

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 35.3 47.0 12.6 5.1 844

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 40.7 46.8 10.0 2.6 231
..... CALS
..... CED 3.5 47.6 52.4 . . 42
..... CHASS 2.9 25.9 44.6 20.9 8.6 139
..... CNR 3.2 39.1 47.8 4.3 8.7 46
..... COE 3.1 32.1 47.8 13.4 6.7 134
..... COM 2.9 23.8 57.1 7.1 11.9 42
..... COT 3.1 26.9 57.7 15.4 . 26
..... CVM 3.3 47.6 39.7 11.1 1.6 63
..... Design 3.0 34.8 43.5 13.0 8.7 23
..... PAMS 3.1 35.2 44.0 17.6 3.3 91
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 16.0 46.7 25.5 11.8 212

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.9 25.5 51.0 13.7 9.8 51
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 30.8 30.8 30.8 7.7 13
..... CHASS 2.4 10.2 38.8 32.7 18.4 49
..... CNR 2.6 . 66.7 25.0 8.3 12
..... COE 2.7 12.5 50.0 33.3 4.2 24
..... COM 3.0 33.3 44.4 11.1 11.1 9
..... COT 3.0 33.3 33.3 33.3 . 3
..... CVM 3.0 12.5 75.0 12.5 . 8
..... Design 2.2 . 45.5 31.8 22.7 22
..... PAMS 2.9 25.0 43.8 25.0 6.3 16
..... Student Affairs 2.7 . 66.7 33.3 . 3
Back to Top

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity

  Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 16.9 52.5 21.3 9.3 549

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity Mean Rating 4: Strongly
agree (%)
3: Agree
(%)

2: Disagree
(%)
1: Strongly
disagree (%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.9 23.3 50.0 18.2 8.5 176
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 15.2 54.5 24.2 6.1 33
..... CHASS 2.6 14.5 46.1 27.6 11.8 76
..... CNR 2.5 8.1 48.6 24.3 18.9 37
..... COE 2.7 13.3 48.2 30.1 8.4 83
..... COM 2.6 13.6 50.0 18.2 18.2 22
..... COT 3.1 21.4 71.4 7.1 . 14
..... CVM 3.0 14.6 68.3 14.6 2.4 41
..... Design 3.0 28.6 52.4 14.3 4.8 21
..... PAMS 2.8 10.0 65.0 17.5 7.5 40
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 75.0 25.0 . 4
Back to Top

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.0 27.2 53.4 14.2 5.1 801

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.1 27.0 58.7 9.0 5.3 189
..... CALS
..... CED 2.8 19.0 47.6 26.2 7.1 42
..... CHASS 2.8 19.6 49.0 25.2 6.3 143
..... CNR 3.2 33.3 53.8 7.7 5.1 39
..... COE 3.2 35.6 52.6 8.9 3.0 135
..... COM 3.2 30.2 58.1 9.3 2.3 43
..... COT 3.7 73.1 23.1 3.8 . 26
..... CVM 3.0 21.3 59.0 16.4 3.3 61
..... Design 2.7 4.5 63.6 27.3 4.5 22
..... PAMS 2.9 24.2 51.6 14.7 9.5 95
..... Student Affairs 3.3 25.0 75.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 10.3 48.2 27.9 13.6 670

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 9.1 61.4 20.5 9.1 132
..... CALS
..... CED 2.3 7.7 41.0 28.2 23.1 39
..... CHASS 2.4 10.2 38.7 35.8 15.3 137
..... CNR 2.8 22.6 48.4 16.1 12.9 31
..... COE 2.6 7.0 57.4 24.3 11.3 115
..... COM 2.4 5.3 47.4 28.9 18.4 38
..... COT 2.5 15.0 30.0 40.0 15.0 20
..... CVM 2.6 13.0 45.7 26.1 15.2 46
..... Design 2.2 4.5 31.8 45.5 18.2 22
..... PAMS 2.6 15.5 44.0 27.4 13.1 84
..... Student Affairs 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 4
Back to Top

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.1 20.9 72.5 5.4 1.2 745

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.1 20.4 74.6 3.9 1.1 181
..... CALS
..... CED 3.1 27.5 62.5 5.0 5.0 40
..... CHASS 3.2 26.4 69.8 3.9 . 129
..... CNR 3.3 31.7 63.4 4.9 . 41
..... COE 3.1 15.5 76.0 7.0 1.6 129
..... COM 3.1 20.6 70.6 8.8 . 34
..... COT 3.4 40.0 56.0 4.0 . 25
..... CVM 3.0 12.3 75.4 10.5 1.8 57
..... Design 2.8 5.3 73.7 15.8 5.3 19
..... PAMS 3.2 19.3 79.5 . 1.2 83
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.3 6.9 40.0 32.1 21.1 598

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.3 7.7 42.3 26.9 23.1 130
..... CALS
..... CED 2.2 2.5 32.5 47.5 17.5 40
..... CHASS 2.1 5.9 28.6 37.8 27.7 119
..... CNR 2.6 12.5 50.0 18.8 18.8 32
..... COE 2.2 2.2 35.2 41.8 20.9 91
..... COM 2.4 5.9 52.9 20.6 20.6 34
..... COT 2.7 9.1 54.5 36.4 . 22
..... CVM 2.4 13.3 35.6 31.1 20.0 45
..... Design 1.9 . 28.6 33.3 38.1 21
..... PAMS 2.7 12.1 56.9 20.7 10.3 58
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.9 16.8 63.9 14.2 5.1 732

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.9 16.5 64.8 13.6 5.1 176
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 29.5 50.0 15.9 4.5 44
..... CHASS 3.0 21.8 60.9 12.8 4.5 133
..... CNR 3.0 17.1 70.7 12.2 . 41
..... COE 3.0 12.0 75.2 9.4 3.4 117
..... COM 2.7 10.3 61.5 12.8 15.4 39
..... COT 3.3 43.5 39.1 17.4 . 23
..... CVM 2.8 11.3 58.5 26.4 3.8 53
..... Design 2.3 . 50.0 30.0 20.0 20
..... PAMS 2.9 13.8 70.0 11.3 5.0 80
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.0 16.7 70.7 9.1 3.5 659

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.0 16.4 71.9 11.0 0.7 146
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 20.0 65.0 7.5 7.5 40
..... CHASS 3.0 18.7 66.2 10.1 5.0 139
..... CNR 3.0 8.8 82.4 5.9 2.9 34
..... COE 3.1 13.8 79.3 5.2 1.7 116
..... COM 3.0 17.1 71.4 5.7 5.7 35
..... COT 2.9 20.8 54.2 20.8 4.2 24
..... CVM 2.9 23.8 57.1 4.8 14.3 21
..... Design 2.6 6.3 56.3 25.0 12.5 16
..... PAMS 3.1 19.8 72.8 7.4 . 81
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.4 8.2 38.5 34.5 18.7 825

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.4 11.1 37.2 37.2 14.6 226
..... CALS
..... CED 2.4 6.8 40.9 34.1 18.2 44
..... CHASS 2.1 4.9 30.6 30.6 34.0 144
..... CNR 2.6 4.3 63.0 21.7 10.9 46
..... COE 2.2 4.0 28.6 47.6 19.8 126
..... COM 2.4 4.7 48.8 27.9 18.6 43
..... COT 2.8 19.2 38.5 42.3 . 26
..... CVM 2.4 8.6 41.4 34.5 15.5 58
..... Design 2.3 9.1 40.9 22.7 27.3 22
..... PAMS 2.6 13.3 45.8 27.7 13.3 83
..... Student Affairs 3.2 20.0 80.0 . . 5
Back to Top

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 10.6 50.3 26.3 12.8 716

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.9 17.7 56.3 19.8 6.3 192
..... CALS
..... CED 2.0 2.9 28.6 37.1 31.4 35
..... CHASS 2.4 5.1 43.8 34.3 16.8 137
..... CNR 2.6 9.8 53.7 22.0 14.6 41
..... COE 2.6 7.2 54.6 30.9 7.2 97
..... COM 2.3 5.3 44.7 23.7 26.3 38
..... COT 2.6 10.5 47.4 36.8 5.3 19
..... CVM 2.7 14.0 58.0 14.0 14.0 50
..... Design 2.4 9.1 36.4 40.9 13.6 22
..... PAMS 2.6 12.2 51.2 22.0 14.6 82
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 1
Back to Top

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.3 7.2 36.0 37.8 19.0 669

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.4 8.1 39.9 38.7 13.3 173
..... CALS
..... CED 1.9 . 28.6 37.1 34.3 35
..... CHASS 2.1 5.3 29.0 39.7 26.0 131
..... CNR 2.4 5.3 47.4 28.9 18.4 38
..... COE 2.3 4.5 36.0 44.9 14.6 89
..... COM 2.1 5.7 28.6 31.4 34.3 35
..... COT 2.6 5.6 44.4 50.0 . 18
..... CVM 2.5 14.9 34.0 34.0 17.0 47
..... Design 2.1 4.5 31.8 36.4 27.3 22
..... PAMS 2.5 12.8 42.3 30.8 14.1 78
..... Student Affairs 1.0 . . . 100.0 1
Back to Top

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 8.0 62.2 21.9 7.9 547

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.9 10.7 67.9 17.3 4.2 168
..... CALS
..... CED 2.6 8.8 55.9 23.5 11.8 34
..... CHASS 2.6 8.0 56.0 26.7 9.3 75
..... CNR 2.6 5.4 64.9 16.2 13.5 37
..... COE 2.6 1.2 61.7 29.6 7.4 81
..... COM 2.7 4.8 71.4 14.3 9.5 21
..... COT 2.6 11.1 50.0 27.8 11.1 18
..... CVM 2.7 10.5 52.6 28.9 7.9 38
..... Design 2.9 16.7 66.7 11.1 5.6 18
..... PAMS 2.7 7.8 62.7 17.6 11.8 51
..... Student Affairs 2.5 . 50.0 50.0 . 4
Back to Top

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 9.2 56.9 24.9 8.9 638

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 12.6 58.7 23.4 5.4 167
..... CALS
..... CED 2.2 2.8 36.1 38.9 22.2 36
..... CHASS 2.6 11.0 43.0 36.0 10.0 100
..... CNR 2.5 2.5 65.0 15.0 17.5 40
..... COE 2.7 3.7 68.5 25.0 2.8 108
..... COM 2.6 6.9 55.2 24.1 13.8 29
..... COT 2.9 21.7 52.2 17.4 8.7 23
..... CVM 2.7 13.6 54.5 20.5 11.4 44
..... Design 2.5 . 59.1 31.8 9.1 22
..... PAMS 2.8 12.9 62.9 14.5 9.7 62
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.3 40.0 53.6 5.4 1.0 858

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 36.0 57.6 5.5 0.8 236
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 45.5 47.7 6.8 . 44
..... CHASS 3.4 47.6 46.2 4.8 1.4 145
..... CNR 3.3 38.8 57.1 4.1 . 49
..... COE 3.4 41.8 53.0 4.5 0.7 134
..... COM 3.2 35.7 54.8 4.8 4.8 42
..... COT 3.5 50.0 50.0 . . 26
..... CVM 3.1 30.0 55.0 11.7 3.3 60
..... Design 3.4 47.8 43.5 8.7 . 23
..... PAMS 3.4 39.8 55.9 4.3 . 93
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.0 17.1 71.4 8.9 2.7 709

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.1 16.7 74.4 7.1 1.8 168
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 12.8 66.7 15.4 5.1 39
..... CHASS 3.1 19.4 69.8 9.3 1.6 129
..... CNR 3.0 15.8 71.1 13.2 . 38
..... COE 3.0 13.7 73.5 9.4 3.4 117
..... COM 2.9 16.2 67.6 8.1 8.1 37
..... COT 3.2 26.1 69.6 . 4.3 23
..... CVM 3.0 13.7 72.5 9.8 3.9 51
..... Design 3.2 31.8 59.1 9.1 . 22
..... PAMS 3.1 19.2 70.5 7.7 2.6 78
..... Student Affairs 2.8 . 80.0 20.0 . 5
Back to Top

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 7.9 58.5 19.1 14.5 585

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 8.0 62.0 18.7 11.2 187
..... CALS
..... CED 2.7 4.2 66.7 25.0 4.2 24
..... CHASS 2.8 10.8 64.6 16.9 7.7 65
..... CNR 2.5 5.1 56.4 23.1 15.4 39
..... COE 2.3 3.7 49.5 22.4 24.3 107
..... COM 2.8 17.4 60.9 8.7 13.0 23
..... COT 2.2 4.8 42.9 19.0 33.3 21
..... CVM 2.6 9.1 56.8 15.9 18.2 44
..... Design 2.6 5.3 68.4 10.5 15.8 19
..... PAMS 2.7 13.7 52.9 23.5 9.8 51
..... Student Affairs 3.0 . 100.0 . . 4
Back to Top

G5: Assignment of formal mentor

  Yes (%)
No (%)
Don't know
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 25.9 72.6 1.5 881

G5: Assignment of formal mentor Yes (%)
No (%)
Don't know
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 38.0 61.2 0.8 242
..... CALS
..... CED 11.4 86.4 2.3 44
..... CHASS 21.1 77.6 1.4 147
..... CNR 12.0 82.0 6.0 50
..... COE 22.9 75.0 2.1 140
..... COM . 100.0 . 42
..... COT 53.8 46.2 . 26
..... CVM 28.6 71.4 . 63
..... Design 16.7 79.2 4.2 24
..... PAMS 25.0 74.0 1.0 96
..... Student Affairs 40.0 60.0 . 5
Back to Top

G6: Mentor helpfulness

  Mean Rating 4: Very
helpful (%)
3: Somewhat
helpful (%)
2: Not very
helpful (%)
1: Not at
all helpful
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 3.2 50.9 26.8 16.7 5.7 228

G6: Mentor helpfulness Mean Rating 4: Very
helpful (%)
3: Somewhat
helpful (%)
2: Not very
helpful (%)
1: Not at
all helpful
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 3.3 51.1 27.2 18.5 3.3 92
..... CALS
..... CED 2.0 . . 100.0 . 5
..... CHASS 3.4 61.3 22.6 6.5 9.7 31
..... CNR 3.5 66.7 16.7 16.7 . 6
..... COE 3.2 46.9 34.4 6.3 12.5 32
..... COT 3.3 50.0 35.7 7.1 7.1 14
..... CVM 3.2 50.0 27.8 16.7 5.6 18
..... Design 3.8 75.0 25.0 . . 4
..... PAMS 3.1 45.8 25.0 25.0 4.2 24
..... Student Affairs 3.0 50.0 . 50.0 . 2
Back to Top

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.8 18.5 50.5 20.8 10.3 731

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.8 14.7 56.4 19.7 9.2 218
..... CALS
..... CED 3.4 61.0 26.8 4.9 7.3 41
..... CHASS 2.4 11.1 30.0 44.4 14.4 90
..... CNR 2.9 26.7 42.2 22.2 8.9 45
..... COE 2.7 11.9 57.0 20.0 11.1 135
..... COM 2.5 9.1 54.5 9.1 27.3 22
..... COT 2.8 12.0 64.0 20.0 4.0 25
..... CVM 2.8 16.4 58.2 18.2 7.3 55
..... Design 2.1 . 30.8 46.2 23.1 13
..... PAMS 3.1 30.6 54.1 8.2 7.1 85
Back to Top

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.7 11.4 55.1 21.7 11.7 691

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.6 8.0 58.2 23.0 10.8 213
..... CALS
..... CED 2.9 35.3 29.4 20.6 14.7 34
..... CHASS 2.5 10.1 41.8 31.6 16.5 79
..... CNR 2.7 15.9 54.5 11.4 18.2 44
..... COE 2.7 8.4 60.3 21.4 9.9 131
..... COM 2.5 6.3 62.5 6.3 25.0 16
..... COT 2.8 20.0 48.0 28.0 4.0 25
..... CVM 2.8 11.5 59.6 25.0 3.8 52
..... Design 2.4 . 58.3 25.0 16.7 12
..... PAMS 2.8 14.5 59.0 14.5 12.0 83
Back to Top

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.6 9.9 53.0 25.2 12.0 619

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.7 10.9 57.6 19.0 12.5 184
..... CALS
..... CED 3.0 33.3 42.4 18.2 6.1 33
..... CHASS 2.3 8.5 29.6 43.7 18.3 71
..... CNR 2.8 19.0 52.4 19.0 9.5 42
..... COE 2.6 4.1 59.3 26.8 9.8 123
..... COM 2.3 . 58.8 11.8 29.4 17
..... COT 2.3 . 47.8 34.8 17.4 23
..... CVM 2.5 4.2 54.2 29.2 12.5 48
..... Design 2.3 . 40.0 50.0 10.0 10
..... PAMS 2.8 13.6 59.1 21.2 6.1 66
Back to Top

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.5 7.6 52.1 26.5 13.8 593

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.5 6.6 56.3 21.9 15.3 183
..... CALS
..... CED 2.7 20.0 36.7 33.3 10.0 30
..... CHASS 2.3 8.1 32.3 45.2 14.5 62
..... CNR 2.6 12.8 51.3 23.1 12.8 39
..... COE 2.6 5.9 58.5 25.4 10.2 118
..... COM 2.8 . 84.6 7.7 7.7 13
..... COT 2.4 9.1 45.5 22.7 22.7 22
..... CVM 2.4 4.3 48.9 27.7 19.1 47
..... Design 2.4 . 55.6 33.3 11.1 9
..... PAMS 2.6 8.8 51.5 26.5 13.2 68
Back to Top

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.1 3.0 33.4 32.0 31.5 631

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.1 2.1 37.1 34.0 26.8 194
..... CALS
..... CED 2.5 8.6 40.0 40.0 11.4 35
..... CHASS 2.2 3.3 34.4 37.7 24.6 61
..... CNR 2.1 2.6 38.5 28.2 30.8 39
..... COE 1.8 . 21.6 36.0 42.4 125
..... COM 2.3 21.4 21.4 21.4 35.7 14
..... COT 2.6 9.5 57.1 19.0 14.3 21
..... CVM 2.3 1.9 48.1 32.7 17.3 52
..... Design 2.3 . 41.7 50.0 8.3 12
..... PAMS 1.7 3.9 22.4 17.1 56.6 76
Back to Top

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 2.1 3.7 31.6 36.5 28.1 572

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.2 3.3 36.5 36.5 23.8 181
..... CALS
..... CED 2.5 8.8 38.2 44.1 8.8 34
..... CHASS 2.2 3.4 37.3 39.0 20.3 59
..... CNR 2.2 2.9 35.3 38.2 23.5 34
..... COE 1.8 . 23.3 37.9 38.8 103
..... COM 2.4 21.4 21.4 28.6 28.6 14
..... COT 2.8 18.8 50.0 25.0 6.3 16
..... CVM 2.2 4.1 32.7 46.9 16.3 49
..... Design 2.2 . 36.4 45.5 18.2 11
..... PAMS 1.7 1.4 18.8 24.6 55.1 69
Back to Top

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation

  Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
Total (N) 1.9 3.7 22.7 34.4 39.2 625

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation Mean Rating 4: Very
Satisfied
(%)
3: Satisfied
(%)
2: Dissatisfied
(%)
1: Very dissatisfied
(%)
Total (N)
College of appointment 2.0 3.7 23.0 38.2 35.1 191
..... CALS
..... CED 2.2 5.6 27.8 47.2 19.4 36
..... CHASS 2.1 6.8 27.1 35.6 30.5 59
..... CNR 2.0 2.6 26.3 36.8 34.2 38
..... COE 1.6 . 14.4 32.8 52.8 125
..... COM 2.2 15.4 30.8 15.4 38.5 13
..... COT 2.0 9.5 14.3 42.9 33.3 21
..... CVM 2.1 1.9 35.8 35.8 26.4 53
..... Design 2.3 . 45.5 36.4 18.2 11
..... PAMS 1.7 5.3 17.1 19.7 57.9 76
Back to top

Continue to Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure



For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document (Section G only), click here.

To download a Microsoft Word document with results for all sections of the survey, click here.

Return to Annotated Questionnaire

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page