North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Natural Resources
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	100.0	78.9	80.0	66.7
..... Yes (%)	.	21.1	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	15.8	10.0	41.7
3: Agree (%)	45.0	73.7	60.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	5.3	30.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	8.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.3	15.8	.	40.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	73.7	40.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.6	5.3	30.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	30.0	.
Total (N)	19	19	10	10

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2	2.6	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	31.6	10.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	57.9	60.0	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	5.3	10.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	5.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	18	19	10	12

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	4.2	4.2	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	26.3	42.1	44.4	25.0
4: Strong (%)	42.1	47.4	33.3	50.0
3: Average (%)	31.6	.	22.2	16.7
2: Weak (%)	.	10.5	.	8.3
Total (N)	19	19	9	12

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.9	4.0	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	10.5	21.1	22.2	16.7
4: Strong (%)	52.6	63.2	66.7	66.7
3: Average (%)	21.1	5.3	.	8.3
2: Weak (%)	15.8	10.5	11.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	.	8.3
Total (N)	19	19	9	12

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	4.1	3.6	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	20.0	21.1	.	25.0
4: Strong (%)	50.0	68.4	55.6	41.7
3: Average (%)	15.0	5.3	44.4	33.3
2: Weak (%)	15.0	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	20	19	9	12

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.4	3.0
4: Strong (%)	22.2	40.0	.	50.0
3: Average (%)	33.3	40.0	40.0	25.0
2: Weak (%)	44.4	.	60.0	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	20.0	.	25.0
Total (N)	9	5	5	4

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6	2.6	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	.	7.1	.	22.2
4: Strong (%)	35.7	57.1	12.5	55.6
3: Average (%)	50.0	21.4	50.0	22.2
2: Weak (%)	14.3	14.3	25.0	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	12.5	.
Total (N)	14	14	8	9

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.5	3.9	4.5
5: Very strong (%)	41.2	73.7	22.2	50.0
4: Strong (%)	47.1	15.8	55.6	50.0
3: Average (%)	5.9	5.3	11.1	.
2: Weak (%)	5.9	.	11.1	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	17	19	9	10

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0	3.4	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	23.5	29.4	10.0	22.2
4: Strong (%)	29.4	52.9	50.0	55.6
3: Average (%)	29.4	11.8	20.0	22.2
2: Weak (%)	17.6	.	10.0	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	5.9	10.0	.
Total (N)	17	17	10	9

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.1	3.8	3.5	3.8
A (%)	20.0	11.1	10.0	16.7
B (%)	70.0	66.7	50.0	58.3
C (%)	5.0	16.7	30.0	16.7
D (%)	5.0	5.6	.	.
F (%)	.	.	10.0	8.3
Total (N)	20	18	10	12

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	4.4	3.9	4.4
A (%)	21.1	42.1	30.0	50.0
B (%)	57.9	52.6	40.0	41.7
C (%)	21.1	5.3	20.0	8.3
D (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.6	3.5	4.3
A (%)	40.0	63.2	20.0	33.3
B (%)	40.0	36.8	30.0	66.7
C (%)	20.0	.	40.0	.
F (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.1	4.4	3.4	4.3
A (%)	35.0	36.8	20.0	33.3
B (%)	40.0	63.2	30.0	66.7
C (%)	20.0	.	30.0	.
D (%)	5.0	.	10.0	.
F (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4	4.2	4.4
A (%)	50.0	42.1	40.0	41.7
B (%)	40.0	57.9	40.0	58.3
C (%)	10.0	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4	4.2	4.3
A (%)	50.0	36.8	30.0	33.3
B (%)	40.0	63.2	60.0	66.7
C (%)	10.0	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	30.0	36.8	20.0	25.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	55.0	52.6	20.0	25.0
No clear vision (%)	15.0	5.3	60.0	33.3
Not familiar (%)	.	5.3	.	16.7
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	29.4	25.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	52.9	70.6	75.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.	.	.
Total (N)	17	17	4	6

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	40.0	10.5	20.0	41.7
Vision with slow progress (%)	40.0	31.6	20.0	16.7
No clear vision (%)	10.0	36.8	50.0	16.7
Not familiar (%)	10.0	21.1	10.0	25.0
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	80.0	63.2	40.0	66.7
Change for the worse (%)	5.0	21.1	30.0	8.3
Not really change (%)	15.0	15.8	30.0	25.0
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	70.0	52.6	20.0	58.3
Change for the worse (%)	10.0	10.5	20.0	8.3
Not really change (%)	20.0	36.8	60.0	33.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	70.0	31.6	20.0	66.7
Change for the worse (%)	10.0	21.1	20.0	.
Not really change (%)	20.0	47.4	60.0	33.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	2.0	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	47.4	10.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	30.0	36.8	20.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	25.0	10.5	30.0	8.3
1: Poor (%)	5.0	5.3	40.0	8.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	2.5	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	35.0	52.6	10.0	45.5
3: Good (%)	40.0	31.6	40.0	36.4
2: Fair (%)	15.0	10.5	40.0	9.1
1: Poor (%)	10.0	5.3	10.0	9.1
Total (N)	20	19	10	11

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2	2.5	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	21.1	42.1	10.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	47.4	47.4	50.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	21.1	.	20.0	8.3
1: Poor (%)	10.5	10.5	20.0	8.3
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	2.6	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	21.1	33.3	11.1	50.0
3: Good (%)	52.6	50.0	44.4	33.3
2: Fair (%)	10.5	11.1	33.3	16.7
1: Poor (%)	15.8	5.6	11.1	.
Total (N)	19	18	9	12

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.1	3.8
4: Excellent (%)	45.0	57.9	44.4	80.0
3: Good (%)	30.0	26.3	22.2	20.0
2: Fair (%)	10.0	5.3	33.3	.
1: Poor (%)	15.0	10.5	.	.
Total (N)	20	19	9	10

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	1.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	22.2	.	22.2
3: Good (%)	35.0	44.4	10.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	30.0	27.8	60.0	22.2
1: Poor (%)	15.0	5.6	30.0	11.1
Total (N)	20	18	10	9

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	35.0	36.8	.	66.7
3: Good (%)	35.0	42.1	50.0	8.3
2: Fair (%)	10.0	10.5	30.0	16.7
1: Poor (%)	20.0	10.5	20.0	8.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	2.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	26.3	13.3	11.1	40.0
3: Good (%)	31.6	66.7	22.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	10.5	6.7	44.4	.
1: Poor (%)	31.6	13.3	22.2	10.0
Total (N)	19	15	9	10

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	15.8	.	33.3
3: Good (%)	40.0	47.4	50.0	41.7
2: Fair (%)	30.0	15.8	20.0	25.0
1: Poor (%)	20.0	21.1	30.0	.
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	21.1	22.2	22.2	27.3
3: Good (%)	42.1	50.0	22.2	63.6
2: Fair (%)	31.6	16.7	44.4	.
1: Poor (%)	5.3	11.1	11.1	9.1
Total (N)	19	18	9	11

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	2.9	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	45.0	41.2	33.3	54.5
3: Good (%)	40.0	41.2	33.3	36.4
2: Fair (%)	15.0	5.9	22.2	9.1
1: Poor (%)	.	11.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	20	17	9	11

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.2	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	61.1	61.1	40.0	63.6
3: Good (%)	22.2	27.8	50.0	27.3
2: Fair (%)	16.7	.	.	9.1
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	18	10	11

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	2.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	26.3	38.9	.	45.5
3: Good (%)	47.4	50.0	50.0	45.5
2: Fair (%)	26.3	.	30.0	.
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1	20.0	9.1
Total (N)	19	18	10	11

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.4	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	31.6	16.7	10.0	54.5
3: Good (%)	42.1	61.1	40.0	36.4
2: Fair (%)	15.8	11.1	30.0	.
1: Poor (%)	10.5	11.1	20.0	9.1
Total (N)	19	18	10	11

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.0	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	44.4	16.7	30.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	27.8	72.2	50.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	5.6	10.0	10.0
1: Poor (%)	5.6	5.6	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	18	10	10

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	.	.	33.3
3: Good (%)	68.4	62.5	30.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	15.8	25.0	40.0	22.2
1: Poor (%)	5.3	12.5	30.0	.
Total (N)	19	16	10	9

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	1.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	.	.	11.1
3: Good (%)	64.7	56.3	20.0	55.6
2: Fair (%)	11.8	31.3	40.0	22.2
1: Poor (%)	11.8	12.5	40.0	11.1
Total (N)	17	16	10	9

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	1.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	.	.	33.3
3: Good (%)	58.8	53.8	22.2	44.4
2: Fair (%)	17.6	30.8	44.4	11.1
1: Poor (%)	11.8	15.4	33.3	11.1
Total (N)	17	13	9	9

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.0	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	31.3	22.2	55.6
3: Good (%)	56.3	56.3	66.7	44.4
2: Fair (%)	18.8	.	.	.
1: Poor (%)	.	12.5	11.1	.
Total (N)	16	16	9	9

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	1.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	11.1	7.1	.	37.5
3: Good (%)	61.1	50.0	11.1	25.0
2: Fair (%)	16.7	14.3	55.6	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.1	28.6	33.3	12.5
Total (N)	18	14	9	8

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	7.7	.	33.3
3: Good (%)	70.6	53.8	30.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	5.9	7.7	40.0	11.1
1: Poor (%)	17.6	30.8	30.0	11.1
Total (N)	17	13	10	9

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	23.1	.	.	33.3
3: Good (%)	53.8	54.5	62.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	15.4	36.4	12.5	33.3
1: Poor (%)	7.7	9.1	25.0	.
Total (N)	13	11	8	6

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	12.5	20.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	26.3	56.3	40.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	42.1	18.8	10.0	11.1
1: Poor (%)	21.1	12.5	30.0	11.1
Total (N)	19	16	10	9

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.3	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	.	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	25.0	71.4	40.0	75.0
2: Fair (%)	43.8	14.3	20.0	25.0
1: Poor (%)	12.5	14.3	30.0	.
Total (N)	16	14	10	8

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.9	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	23.5	25.0	22.2	50.0
3: Good (%)	64.7	58.3	55.6	37.5
2: Fair (%)	11.8	8.3	11.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	17	12	9	8

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.0	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	41.2	33.3	20.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	58.8	60.0	70.0	50.0
1: Poor (%)	.	6.7	10.0	.
Total (N)	17	15	10	10

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.3	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	17.6	15.4	.	33.3
3: Good (%)	70.6	69.2	55.6	55.6
2: Fair (%)	11.8	7.7	22.2	.
1: Poor (%)	.	7.7	22.2	11.1
Total (N)	17	13	9	9

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.3	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	18.8	8.3	11.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	50.0	75.0	33.3	55.6
2: Fair (%)	31.3	8.3	33.3	11.1
1: Poor (%)	.	8.3	22.2	.
Total (N)	16	12	9	9

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.3	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	47.1	60.0	44.4
3: Good (%)	43.8	35.3	20.0	55.6
2: Fair (%)	.	5.9	10.0	.
1: Poor (%)	6.3	11.8	10.0	.
Total (N)	16	17	10	9

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	1.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	.	5.6	.	.
3: Good (%)	41.2	33.3	30.0	70.0
2: Fair (%)	35.3	50.0	30.0	30.0
1: Poor (%)	23.5	11.1	40.0	.
Total (N)	17	18	10	10

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	1.8	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	12.5	.	.
3: Good (%)	41.7	25.0	12.5	66.7
2: Fair (%)	33.3	37.5	50.0	33.3
1: Poor (%)	16.7	25.0	37.5	.
Total (N)	12	16	8	9

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.2	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	6.7	.	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	40.0	44.4	70.0
2: Fair (%)	16.7	26.7	33.3	30.0
1: Poor (%)	16.7	26.7	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	15	9	10

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.4	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	26.7	.	37.5
3: Good (%)	28.6	46.7	62.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	21.4	6.7	12.5	12.5
1: Poor (%)	14.3	20.0	25.0	.
Total (N)	14	15	8	8

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.9	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	23.5	22.2	45.5
3: Good (%)	50.0	47.1	55.6	54.5
2: Fair (%)	12.5	17.6	11.1	.
1: Poor (%)	6.3	11.8	11.1	.
Total (N)	16	17	9	11

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	.	.	10.0
3: Good (%)	50.0	50.0	42.9	70.0
2: Fair (%)	7.1	31.3	28.6	10.0
1: Poor (%)	21.4	18.8	28.6	10.0
Total (N)	14	16	7	10

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	1.5	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	15.4	.	.	.
3: Good (%)	53.8	53.3	.	87.5
2: Fair (%)	7.7	20.0	50.0	12.5
1: Poor (%)	23.1	26.7	50.0	.
Total (N)	13	15	6	8

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.3	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	25.0	50.0	36.4
3: Good (%)	47.1	37.5	40.0	54.5
2: Fair (%)	17.6	25.0	.	9.1
1: Poor (%)	5.9	12.5	10.0	.
Total (N)	17	16	10	11

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.9	68.4	50.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	36.8	26.3	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	57.9	40.0	58.3
3: Agree (%)	63.2	36.8	60.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	8.3
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.6	55.6	50.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	36.8	38.9	40.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	.	10.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.6	.	8.3
Total (N)	19	18	10	12

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	10.5	20.0	8.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	63.2	30.0	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	21.1	40.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	10.0	8.3
Total (N)	18	19	10	12

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	5.3	20.0	8.3
3: Agree (%)	57.9	57.9	10.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	31.6	50.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	5.3	20.0	8.3
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	3.1
4: Very familiar (%)	20.0	31.6	20.0	36.4
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	60.0	47.4	70.0	36.4
2: Not very familiar (%)	20.0	15.8	.	27.3
1: Not at all familiar (%)	.	5.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	20	19	10	11

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	2.1	2.3
4: Very well (%)	5.0	5.3	.	.
3: Fairly well (%)	20.0	10.5	20.0	41.7
2: Not very well (%)	55.0	68.4	70.0	41.7
1: Not at all (%)	20.0	15.8	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.2	2.2
3: Fairly well (%)	30.0	36.8	30.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	55.0	47.4	60.0	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	15.0	15.8	10.0	16.7
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.4	2.6
4: Very well (%)	10.0	5.3	.	16.7
3: Fairly well (%)	45.0	47.4	60.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	35.0	36.8	20.0	41.7
1: Not at all (%)	10.0	10.5	20.0	8.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.7	3.3
4: Very well (%)	10.0	26.3	30.0	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	52.6	30.0	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	30.0	10.5	20.0	8.3
1: Not at all (%)	10.0	10.5	20.0	8.3
Total (N)	20	19	10	12

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.3	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	15.8	.	16.7
3: Agree (%)	63.2	63.2	40.0	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	26.3	15.8	50.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	10.0	8.3
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.6	78.9	40.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	31.6	15.8	60.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	2.7	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	52.6	47.4	10.0	66.7
3: Good (%)	31.6	42.1	50.0	25.0
2: Fair (%)	15.8	.	40.0	8.3
1: Poor (%)	.	10.5	.	.
Total (N)	19	19	10	12

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.6	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	22.2	20.0	40.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	44.4	30.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	27.8	40.0	10.0
1: Poor (%)	.	5.6	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	18	10	10

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	13.3	11.1	25.0
3: Good (%)	64.3	46.7	22.2	62.5
2: Fair (%)	14.3	26.7	33.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	.	13.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	14	15	9	8

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2	2.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	21.4	.	.	10.0
3: Good (%)	42.9	47.1	22.2	60.0
2: Fair (%)	28.6	29.4	66.7	30.0
1: Poor (%)	7.1	23.5	11.1	.
Total (N)	14	17	9	10

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	18.8	.	10.0
3: Agree (%)	61.5	43.8	44.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	25.0	22.2	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.4	12.5	33.3	10.0
Total (N)	13	16	9	10

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	12.5	12.5	22.2
3: Agree (%)	72.7	43.8	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	31.3	12.5	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	12.5	25.0	22.2
Total (N)	11	16	8	9

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.1	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	7.7	.	22.2
3: Agree (%)	45.5	38.5	37.5	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	45.5	38.5	37.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	15.4	25.0	22.2
Total (N)	11	13	8	9

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0	3.0	3.6
4: Very effective (%)	16.7	11.1	25.0	60.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	33.3	77.8	50.0	40.0
2: Not very effective (%)	50.0	11.1	25.0	.
Total (N)	6	9	4	5

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.2	3.1
4: Very important (%)	61.1	52.6	40.0	33.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.9	42.1	40.0	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	.	5.3	20.0	8.3
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	8.3
Total (N)	18	19	10	12

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	2.9	3.3
4: Very important (%)	63.2	58.8	10.0	41.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.3	23.5	70.0	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	5.3	17.6	20.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	5.3	.	.	8.3
Total (N)	19	17	10	12

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	2.4	2.6
4: Very important (%)	52.9	42.9	11.1	18.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.5	28.6	33.3	36.4
2: Not very important (%)	17.6	21.4	44.4	36.4
1: Not at all important (%)	5.9	7.1	11.1	9.1
Total (N)	17	14	9	11

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	6.3	12.5	8.3
3: Agree (%)	70.6	68.8	75.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	25.0	.	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	12.5	8.3
Total (N)	17	16	8	12

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	35.3	12.5	45.5
3: Agree (%)	62.5	52.9	75.0	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	5.9	12.5	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	16	17	8	11

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	29.4	12.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	76.9	64.7	75.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	.	12.5	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	13	17	8	9

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	35.3	33.3	44.4
3: Agree (%)	57.1	52.9	66.7	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	5.9	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	14	17	6	9

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	29.4	22.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	58.8	66.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	5.9	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	15	17	9	12

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	26.7	33.3	22.2
3: Agree (%)	64.3	66.7	55.6	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	14	15	9	9

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	25.0	25.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	69.2	62.5	62.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	6.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	12.5	.
Total (N)	13	16	8	9

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.6	64.7	50.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	38.9	29.4	40.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.	10.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	18	17	10	12

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.2	62.5	62.5	37.5
3: Agree (%)	30.8	31.3	37.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	16	8	8

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	68.8	50.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	25.0	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.3	60.0	44.4	40.0
3: Agree (%)	35.7	40.0	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	22.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	14	10	9	10

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	64.7	55.6	58.3
3: Agree (%)	37.5	29.4	44.4	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	.	.
Total (N)	16	17	9	12

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	58.8	50.0	58.3
3: Agree (%)	44.4	35.3	40.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	17	10	12

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.2	60.0	55.6	54.5
3: Agree (%)	53.8	40.0	44.4	45.5
Total (N)	13	15	9	11

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	57.1	50.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	38.5	42.9	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	13	14	6	10

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.9	62.5	62.5	58.3
3: Agree (%)	31.6	31.3	37.5	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	8	12

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	60.0	62.5	54.5
3: Agree (%)	26.7	33.3	37.5	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	.	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	.	.
Total (N)	15	15	8	11

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.9	68.8	62.5	58.3
3: Agree (%)	42.1	25.0	37.5	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	8	12

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	60.0	62.5	54.5
3: Agree (%)	26.7	40.0	37.5	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	15	10	8	11

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.8	62.5	62.5	58.3
3: Agree (%)	41.2	31.3	37.5	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	17	16	8	12

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.6	64.3	62.5	58.3
3: Agree (%)	47.4	28.6	37.5	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	19	14	8	12

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	61.5	62.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	46.7	38.5	37.5	50.0
Total (N)	15	13	8	10

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.3	61.5	50.0	45.5
3: Agree (%)	28.6	38.5	16.7	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	16.7	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	14	13	6	11

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	2.4	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	26.3	41.2	11.1	16.7
3: Some (%)	63.2	23.5	44.4	58.3
2: A little (%)	10.5	29.4	22.2	16.7
1: Not at all (%)	.	5.9	22.2	8.3
Total (N)	19	17	9	12

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	1.7	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	13.3	23.1	.	10.0
3: Some (%)	33.3	23.1	14.3	20.0
2: A little (%)	20.0	30.8	42.9	20.0
1: Not at all (%)	33.3	23.1	42.9	50.0
Total (N)	15	13	7	10

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.0	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	68.4	52.9	40.0	50.0
3: Some (%)	15.8	35.3	40.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	10.5	11.8	.	8.3
1: None (%)	5.3	.	20.0	8.3
Total (N)	19	17	10	12

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.7	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	29.4	20.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	22.2	35.3	50.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	16.7	5.9	10.0	8.3
1: None (%)	11.1	29.4	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	18	17	10	12

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	1.5	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	22.2	.	.	25.0
3: Some (%)	16.7	47.1	10.0	16.7
2: A little (%)	38.9	11.8	30.0	8.3
1: None (%)	22.2	41.2	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	18	17	10	12

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.3	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	36.8	23.5	20.0	25.0
3: Some (%)	15.8	35.3	20.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	36.8	17.6	30.0	.
1: None (%)	10.5	23.5	30.0	41.7
Total (N)	19	17	10	12

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	1.7	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	27.8	17.6	10.0	16.7
3: Some (%)	11.1	23.5	10.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	22.2	23.5	20.0	8.3
1: None (%)	38.9	35.3	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	18	17	10	12

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	36.8	35.3	30.0	16.7
3: Some (%)	47.4	41.2	30.0	58.3
2: A little (%)	5.3	17.6	20.0	8.3
1: None (%)	10.5	5.9	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	19	17	10	12

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	2.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.4	31.3	10.0	41.7
3: Agree (%)	27.8	43.8	50.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	12.5	30.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.3	53.3	44.4	41.7
3: Agree (%)	43.8	46.7	55.6	58.3
Total (N)	16	15	9	12

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	28.6	12.5	36.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	57.1	87.5	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	14.3	.	9.1
Total (N)	16	14	8	11

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	31.3	10.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	56.3	60.0	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.	30.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	21.4	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	42.9	40.0	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	37.5	21.4	40.0	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	14.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	16	14	10	11

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	15.4	33.3	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	46.2	16.7	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	23.1	50.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	15.4	.	.
Total (N)	12	13	6	10

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	2.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.9	43.8	20.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	50.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	.	20.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.6	2.8
Frequently (%)	27.8	31.3	10.0	25.0
Sometimes (%)	44.4	31.3	60.0	50.0
Seldom (%)	11.1	6.3	10.0	8.3
Never (%)	16.7	31.3	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	2.9	3.2
Frequently (%)	50.0	37.5	30.0	50.0
Sometimes (%)	38.9	56.3	50.0	33.3
Seldom (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Never (%)	5.6	6.3	20.0	16.7
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.7	3.1
Frequently (%)	38.9	31.3	40.0	41.7
Sometimes (%)	38.9	43.8	20.0	41.7
Seldom (%)	11.1	18.8	10.0	.
Never (%)	11.1	6.3	30.0	16.7
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	38.9	25.0	50.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	38.9	62.5	30.0	50.0
Seldom (%)	16.7	6.3	10.0	8.3
Never (%)	5.6	6.3	10.0	8.3
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	2.0	2.4
Frequently (%)	16.7	12.5	.	8.3
Sometimes (%)	16.7	43.8	40.0	50.0
Seldom (%)	50.0	18.8	20.0	16.7
Never (%)	16.7	25.0	40.0	25.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.6	3.8
Frequently (%)	83.3	68.8	70.0	83.3
Sometimes (%)	5.6	25.0	20.0	16.7
Seldom (%)	11.1	.	10.0	.
Never (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.0	3.2
Frequently (%)	38.9	31.3	30.0	41.7
Sometimes (%)	44.4	43.8	40.0	41.7
Seldom (%)	11.1	18.8	30.0	8.3
Never (%)	5.6	6.3	.	8.3
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	52.9	31.3	30.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	29.4	50.0	60.0	41.7
Seldom (%)	17.6	12.5	10.0	16.7
Never (%)	.	6.3	.	8.3
Total (N)	17	16	10	12

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.0	3.6
Frequently (%)	38.9	60.0	30.0	75.0
Sometimes (%)	38.9	26.7	50.0	16.7
Seldom (%)	16.7	6.7	10.0	.
Never (%)	5.6	6.7	10.0	8.3
Total (N)	18	15	10	12

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	3.0	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.8	16.7	42.9	55.6
3: Satisfied (%)	43.8	75.0	28.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	14.3	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	8.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	12	7	9

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.1	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	8.3	14.3	55.6
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	66.7	85.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	25.0	.	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	12	7	9

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	2.9	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	62.5	50.0	28.6	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	25.0	41.7	28.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	42.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	16	12	7	9

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	68.8	83.3	71.4	77.8
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	8.3	28.6	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	16	12	7	9

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.8	33.3	57.1	55.6
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	50.0	14.3	11.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	8.3	28.6	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	.	11.1
Total (N)	16	12	7	9

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	7.7	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	76.9	33.3	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	15.4	33.3	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.	22.2	14.3
Total (N)	17	13	9	7

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	26.7	30.0	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	66.7	60.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	.	10.0	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	6.7	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	15	10	10

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	7.7	.	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	76.9	33.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	7.7	33.3	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	7.7	33.3	.
Total (N)	15	13	6	8

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.4	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	7.1	14.3	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	26.7	64.3	42.9	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	21.4	14.3	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	7.1	28.6	11.1
Total (N)	15	14	7	9

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	46.7	12.5	80.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	26.7	87.5	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	.	.
Total (N)	18	15	8	10

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.0	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	26.7	22.2	72.7
3: Agree (%)	66.7	66.7	66.7	18.2
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	6.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	11.1	9.1
Total (N)	18	15	9	11

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	77.8	50.0	100.0	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	25.0	.	20.0
Total (N)	9	4	1	5

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	2.9	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	28.6	14.3	66.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	28.6	71.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	35.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	14.3	.
Total (N)	12	14	7	9

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.	.	30.0
3: Agree (%)	53.3	50.0	55.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	28.6	22.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	21.4	22.2	.
Total (N)	15	14	9	10

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	43.8	33.3	60.0
3: Agree (%)	68.8	43.8	44.4	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	6.3	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	6.3	11.1	10.0
Total (N)	16	16	9	10

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	3.0	2.5
3: Agree (%)	66.7	60.0	100.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	20.0	.	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	6	5	2	2

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.1	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	38.5	44.4	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	30.8	22.2	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	30.8	22.2	12.5
Total (N)	12	13	9	8

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.3	41.7	40.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	33.3	60.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	16.7	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	8.3	.	.
Total (N)	16	12	5	10

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	27.3	.	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	36.4	60.0	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	27.3	40.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	9.1	.	14.3
Total (N)	12	11	5	7

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.2	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.5	30.8	16.7	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	61.5	83.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.3	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	16	13	6	10

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	.	.	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	60.0	50.0	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	20.0	16.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	20.0	33.3	20.0
Total (N)	15	10	6	5

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	14.3	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	71.4	83.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	14.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	16	14	6	9

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.	16.7	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	100.0	83.3	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	13	10	6	8

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.3	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	78.6	50.0	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.4	14.3	25.0	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	7.1	25.0	.
Total (N)	17	14	8	11

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	7.1	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	50.0	60.0	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	35.7	20.0	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	7.1	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	14	10	9

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.4	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	30.0	45.5	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	45.5	30.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.0	9.1	20.0	10.0
Total (N)	10	11	10	10

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.5	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	66.7	70.0	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	16.7	10.0	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	16.7	20.0	.
Total (N)	12	12	10	8

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.4	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	69.2	62.5	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	15.4	12.5	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	15.4	25.0	11.1
Total (N)	15	13	8	9

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.4	37.5	40.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	62.5	60.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	17	16	10	12

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	8.3	22.2	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	76.9	83.3	66.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	8.3	11.1	25.0
Total (N)	13	12	9	8

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	.	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	63.6	33.3	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	27.3	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	9.1	33.3	.
Total (N)	14	11	9	9

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	22.2	12.5	.	.
No (%)	72.2	87.5	90.0	91.7
Don't know (%)	5.6	.	10.0	8.3
Total (N)	18	16	10	12

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer	7-15
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Very helpful (%)	75.0	50.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	.	50.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	4	2

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6	2.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.8	16.7	.	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	41.7	44.4	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	33.3	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	16.7	22.2	.
Total (N)	16	12	9	11

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	8.3	.	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	58.3	33.3	72.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	8.3	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.3	25.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	15	12	9	11

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	16.7	.	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	41.7	41.7	50.0	81.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	41.7	12.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.	37.5	.
Total (N)	12	12	8	11

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	1.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	18.2	.	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	45.5	25.0	90.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	36.4	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	50.0	.
Total (N)	11	11	8	10

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9	1.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	12.5	22.2	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	62.5	11.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.7	25.0	66.7	.
Total (N)	14	8	9	10

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0	1.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	30.8	16.7	28.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	66.7	28.6	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	38.5	16.7	42.9	.
Total (N)	13	6	7	10

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.6	1.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	35.7	.	12.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	62.5	12.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.7	37.5	62.5	10.0
Total (N)	14	8	8	10

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	31.3	30.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	56.3	30.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	6.3	30.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	6.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	31.3	40.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	47.1	62.5	50.0	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	.	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	17	16	10	9

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	2.9	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	50.0	33.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	28.6	44.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	14.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	14	9	10

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	42.9	60.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	62.5	35.7	40.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	14.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	16	14	5	10

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	2.8	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	50.0	11.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	64.7	35.7	66.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	17	14	9	10

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	37.5	10.0	30.0
3: Agree (%)	47.1	37.5	30.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	18.8	40.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	20.0	10.0
Total (N)	17	16	10	10

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	31.3	10.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	52.9	43.8	70.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	12.5	10.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	10.0	10.0
Total (N)	17	16	10	10

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	12.5	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	29.4	43.8	30.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	18.8	50.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.5	25.0	20.0	10.0
Total (N)	17	16	10	10

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	14.3	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	50.0	44.4	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	.	33.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	35.7	22.2	10.0
Total (N)	16	14	9	10

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	2.8	3.4
4: Very well (%)	22.2	25.0	30.0	40.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	56.3	40.0	60.0
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	18.8	10.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	11.1	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	63.2	12.5	30.0	30.0
Yes (%)	36.8	87.5	70.0	70.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	89.5	25.0	20.0	10.0
Yes (%)	10.5	75.0	80.0	90.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	89.5	50.0	20.0	10.0
Yes (%)	10.5	50.0	80.0	90.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	52.6	100.0	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	47.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	3.0	3.5
4: Very well (%)	27.8	43.8	30.0	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	27.8	43.8	50.0	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	38.9	12.5	10.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4	3.1	3.8
4: Very well (%)	22.2	50.0	40.0	80.0
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	37.5	30.0	20.0
2: Not very well (%)	27.8	12.5	30.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	21.4	.	40.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	64.3	75.0	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	12	14	8	10

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	38.5	28.6	60.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	53.8	71.4	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	.	.	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	12	13	7	10

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	2.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	13.3	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	56.3	66.7	40.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	20.0	40.0	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	16	15	10	9

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	6.3	12.5	22.2
3: Agree (%)	58.8	68.8	25.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	18.8	37.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	25.0	11.1
Total (N)	17	16	8	9

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	75.0	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	6	4	1	1

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	1.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	.	.	16.7
3: Agree (%)	44.4	83.3	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	44.4	8.3	16.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	50.0	16.7
Total (N)	9	12	6	6

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	1.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	.	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	58.3	61.5	14.3	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	30.8	57.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.7	28.6	11.1
Total (N)	12	13	7	9

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	1.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.	.	40.0
3: Agree (%)	46.7	57.1	22.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	35.7	44.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	7.1	33.3	.
Total (N)	15	14	9	10

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	7.1	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	68.8	57.1	55.6	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	21.4	33.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	14.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	16	14	9	9

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	37.5	50.0	44.4
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	37.5	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	6.3	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.3	12.5	11.1
Total (N)	16	16	8	9

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8	3.0	3.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	75.0	100.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	60.0	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	5	4	1	1

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	10.0	.	14.3
3: Agree (%)	87.5	60.0	71.4	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	20.0	14.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	14.3	14.3
Total (N)	8	10	7	7

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	14.3	14.3	11.1
3: Agree (%)	50.0	57.1	42.9	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	21.4	28.6	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	14.3	11.1
Total (N)	12	14	7	9

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	13.3	.	30.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	60.0	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	13.3	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	13.3	33.3	.
Total (N)	12	15	9	10

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	31.3	73.3	90.0	90.0
No experience (%)	68.8	26.7	10.0	10.0
Total (N)	16	15	10	10

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	87.5	53.3	20.0	10.0
Yes (%)	12.5	46.7	80.0	90.0
Total (N)	16	15	10	10

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	87.5	66.7	40.0	20.0
Yes (%)	12.5	33.3	60.0	80.0
Total (N)	16	15	10	10

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	86.7	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	.	13.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	16	15	10	10

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	93.3	100.0	90.0
Yes (%)	.	6.7	.	10.0
Total (N)	16	15	10	10

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	21.4	20.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1	71.4	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	.	20.0	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	7	14	10	9

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	7.7	.	30.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	53.8	55.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	30.8	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	7.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	10	13	9	10

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	7.7	10.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	70.0	69.2	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	15.4	20.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	7.7	10.0	.
Total (N)	10	13	10	10

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	70.0	69.2	60.0	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	23.1	20.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	7.7	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	13	10	10

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	87.5	81.8	88.9	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	9.1	11.1	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	8	11	9	10

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	85.7	90.9	100.0	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	7	11	6	9

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	83.3	66.7	44.4	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	.	22.2	33.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	11.1	22.2	.
Total (N)	6	9	9	9

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	.	10.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	66.7	40.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	8.3	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	25.0	30.0	.
Total (N)	6	12	10	9

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	8.3	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	47.1	50.0	77.8	77.8
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	8.3	11.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.8	33.3	.	11.1
Total (N)	17	12	9	9

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	9.1	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	45.5	45.5	37.5	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	27.3	50.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	18.2	.	12.5
Total (N)	11	11	8	8

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.5	2.3	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	8.3	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	18.2	50.0	28.6	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	54.5	25.0	28.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	27.3	16.7	28.6	12.5
Total (N)	11	12	7	8

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.3	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	16.7	20.0	.
3: Agree (%)	30.0	33.3	60.0	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	16.7	.	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	40.0	33.3	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	6	5	8

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.5	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	9.1	.	.
3: Agree (%)	17.6	45.5	62.5	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	52.9	27.3	25.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.4	18.2	12.5	.
Total (N)	17	11	8	10

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	1.9	2.9
4: Very well (%)	5.6	18.8	10.0	20.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	18.8	10.0	60.0
2: Not very well (%)	11.1	25.0	40.0	10.0
1: Not at all (%)	33.3	37.5	40.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	.	10.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	61.5	46.2	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	30.8	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.1	23.1	20.0	10.0
Total (N)	13	13	10	10

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.2	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.9	25.0	40.0	70.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	75.0	40.0	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	.	20.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.9	1.7	2.0
3: Agree (%)	22.2	20.0	.	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	38.9	46.7	70.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	38.9	33.3	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	18	15	10	9

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	46.2	14.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	30.8	71.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	23.1	14.3	20.0
Total (N)	18	13	7	10

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	69.2	63.6	85.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	18.2	.	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	18.2	14.3	.
Total (N)	13	11	7	9

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	.	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	50.0	40.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	43.8	40.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	6.3	20.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	6.3	.	40.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	62.5	70.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	25.0	20.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	6.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.	30.0
3: Agree (%)	61.1	62.5	60.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	31.3	30.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	6.3	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.9	3.6	3.9
4: Very important (%)	88.9	87.5	60.0	90.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	11.1	12.5	40.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.3
4: Very important (%)	72.2	68.8	70.0	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.8	31.3	30.0	40.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.5	3.3
4: Very important (%)	72.2	62.5	50.0	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.8	37.5	50.0	40.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.9	3.4
4: Very important (%)	77.8	56.3	90.0	60.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	11.1	43.8	10.0	30.0
2: Not very important (%)	11.1	.	.	.
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2	3.4	3.2
4: Very important (%)	72.2	37.5	50.0	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.7	43.8	40.0	30.0
2: Not very important (%)	11.1	18.8	10.0	10.0
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.1	3.2	3.4
4: Very important (%)	77.8	40.0	50.0	60.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.7	33.3	30.0	30.0
2: Not very important (%)	5.6	20.0	10.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	.	6.7	10.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	15	10	10

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	1.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	18.8	11.1	10.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	43.8	.	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	18.8	44.4	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	18.8	44.4	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	10

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.5	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	12.5	10.0	20.0
3: Agree (%)	38.9	37.5	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	38.9	31.3	20.0	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	18.8	20.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	6.3	11.1	30.0
3: Agree (%)	61.1	56.3	33.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	25.0	33.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	12.5	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	16	9	10

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.2	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.8	25.0	30.0	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	27.8	50.0	60.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	18.8	10.0	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	14.3	.	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	27.3	28.6	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	42.9	33.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	14.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	11	7	6	6

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.4	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	.	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	66.7	57.1	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	33.3	28.6	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	14.3	.
Total (N)	16	12	7	9

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	66.7	66.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	33.3	33.3	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	11	3	3	5

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	38.9	68.8	60.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	6.3	20.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.8	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	50.0	70.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.6	25.0	20.0	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	38.9	25.0	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.4	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	13.3	.	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	46.7	55.6	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	33.3	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	6.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	15	9	10

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.2	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.9	25.0	40.0	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	68.8	50.0	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	6.3	.	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	12.5	.	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	50.0	50.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	31.3	50.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	45.5	70.0	42.9	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	20.0	42.9	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	10.0	14.3	14.3
Total (N)	11	10	7	7

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8	1.5	1.7
3: Satisfied (%)	27.8	25.0	10.0	10.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	44.4	31.3	30.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.8	43.8	60.0	40.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.5	1.3	1.4
3: Satisfied (%)	27.8	6.7	10.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	33.3	10.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	60.0	80.0	60.0
Total (N)	18	15	10	10

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	57.1	25.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	66.7	28.6	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	25.0	.
Total (N)	3	7	4	5

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	25.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	83.3	66.7	25.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.	.	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	33.3	50.0	16.7
Total (N)	12	3	4	6

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	82.4	78.6	70.0	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	7.1	20.0	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	17	14	10	10

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.7	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	27.8	43.8	70.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	31.3	30.0	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.2	25.0	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	3.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	20.0	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	73.3	70.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	6.7	10.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	20.0	.	10.0
Total (N)	18	15	10	10

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	10.0	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	31.3	30.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	25.0	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	43.8	20.0	22.2
Total (N)	18	16	10	9

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.4	2.6
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	46.2	37.5	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	38.5	62.5	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	15.4	.	.
Total (N)	18	13	8	9

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.5	2.4
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	61.5	50.0	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.1	30.8	50.0	55.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	17	13	6	9

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	13.3	.	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	60.0	75.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	26.7	25.0	30.0
Total (N)	18	15	8	10

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	1.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	7.1	.	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	35.7	25.0	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	42.9	37.5	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	37.5	.
Total (N)	14	14	8	9

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0	2.2	2.4
3: Satisfied (%)	30.0	36.4	40.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	27.3	40.0	57.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	36.4	20.0	.
Total (N)	10	11	5	7

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	.	.	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	44.4	75.0	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	61.5	44.4	25.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1	.	.
Total (N)	13	9	4	7

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1	2.7	3.1
4: A lot (%)	44.4	12.5	30.0	40.0
3: Some (%)	27.8	31.3	30.0	40.0
2: A little (%)	5.6	12.5	20.0	10.0
1: None at all (%)	22.2	43.8	20.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4	3.0	3.3
4: Very likely (%)	38.9	25.0	30.0	50.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	44.4	25.0	50.0	40.0
2: Not very likely (%)	16.7	18.8	10.0	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	.	31.3	10.0	10.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.9	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	6.7	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	93.3	90.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	18	15	10	10

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	88.9	93.8	80.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	6.3	20.0	30.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.1	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	18.2	12.5	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	81.8	87.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	.	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	11	8	8

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	7.7	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	84.6	100.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	7.7	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	16	13	8	8

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	100.0	83.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	.	16.7	.
Total (N)	13	8	6	6

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	16.7	.	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	90.9	75.0	75.0	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3	25.0	25.0
Total (N)	11	12	8	8

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	18.2	12.5	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	54.5	75.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	18.2	.	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	9.1	12.5	.
Total (N)	13	11	8	7

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.8	3.2	4.2	2.9
Once a week or more (%)	66.7	31.3	50.0	22.2
A few times a month (%)	5.6	6.3	10.0	11.1
A few times a semester (%)	5.6	6.3	10.0	11.1
Once a semester (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Once a year (%)	5.6	6.3	.	.
Never (%)	16.7	43.8	30.0	55.6
Total (N)	18	16	10	9

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	2.6	2.7	1.7
Once a week or more (%)	27.8	6.3	10.0	11.1
A few times a month (%)	11.1	12.5	20.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	27.8	18.8	.	.
Once a semester (%)	5.6	6.3	20.0	.
Once a year (%)	11.1	6.3	.	11.1
Never (%)	16.7	50.0	50.0	77.8
Total (N)	18	16	10	9

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	1.3	1.4	1.2
Once a week or more (%)	11.1	.	.	.
A few times a month (%)	5.6	.	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	22.2	6.3	.	.
Once a semester (%)	5.6	6.3	11.1	10.0
Once a year (%)	11.1	.	22.2	.
Never (%)	44.4	87.5	66.7	90.0
Total (N)	18	16	9	10

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.6	2.5
A few times a month (%)	11.1	.	.	.
A few times a semester (%)	22.2	43.8	40.0	50.0
Once a semester (%)	16.7	12.5	10.0	.
Once a year (%)	16.7	12.5	20.0	.
Never (%)	33.3	31.3	30.0	50.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.3	2.9
A few times a month (%)	22.2	.	10.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	11.1	31.3	20.0	50.0
Once a semester (%)	11.1	12.5	10.0	10.0
Once a year (%)	22.2	18.8	10.0	20.0
Never (%)	33.3	37.5	50.0	20.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.2	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	44.4	25.0	20.0	20.0
3: Some (%)	16.7	.	20.0	10.0
2: A little (%)	16.7	25.0	20.0	30.0
1: None at all (%)	22.2	50.0	40.0	40.0
Total (N)	18	16	10	10

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	1.2	1.5	1.4
4: Very likely (%)	33.3	.	10.0	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	16.7	6.7	.	10.0
2: Not very likely (%)	22.2	6.7	20.0	20.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	27.8	86.7	70.0	70.0
Total (N)	18	15	10	10

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	57.4	56.6	54.5	53.9
more than 60 hrs (%)	22.2	18.8	10.0	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	27.8	50.0	40.0	55.6
41 to 50 hrs (%)	50.0	31.3	40.0	33.3
40 hrs or less (%)	.	.	10.0	11.1
Total (N)	18	16	10	9

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	29.6	38.1	24.0	32.0
more than 50% of time (%)	10.5	25.0	.	10.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	47.4	37.5	40.0	30.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	21.1	18.8	40.0	40.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.3	12.5	10.0	10.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.3	6.3	.	10.0
0% of time (%)	10.5	.	10.0	.
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	17.6	25.0	22.2	40.0
Yes (%)	82.4	75.0	77.8	60.0
Total (N)	17	16	9	10

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	70.6	37.5	66.7	70.0
Yes (%)	29.4	62.5	33.3	30.0
Total (N)	17	16	9	10

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	29.4	18.8	22.2	20.0
Yes (%)	70.6	81.3	77.8	80.0
Total (N)	17	16	9	10

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	47.1	75.0	55.6	70.0
Yes (%)	52.9	25.0	44.4	30.0
Total (N)	17	16	9	10

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	29.4	12.5	.	20.0
Yes (%)	70.6	87.5	100.0	80.0
Total (N)	17	16	9	10

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.4	6.8	5.6	6.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.3	12.5	10.0	10.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	36.8	12.5	20.0	30.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	42.1	68.8	50.0	30.0
0% of time (%)	15.8	6.3	20.0	30.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	33.3	.	28.6
Yes (%)	75.0	66.7	100.0	71.4
Total (N)	16	15	8	7

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	37.5	46.7	25.0	42.9
Yes (%)	62.5	53.3	75.0	57.1
Total (N)	16	15	8	7

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	34.5	20.7	29.0	32.0
more than 50% of time (%)	15.8	6.3	10.0	10.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	42.1	25.0	40.0	50.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	21.1	18.8	20.0	10.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.5	31.3	10.0	30.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.3	6.3	.	.
0% of time (%)	5.3	12.5	20.0	.
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.8	0.3	0.5	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.3	.	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	6.3	10.0	.
0% of time (%)	94.7	93.8	90.0	100.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.4	14.7	22.5	10.0
more than 50% of time (%)	5.3	12.5	10.0	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.3	6.3	30.0	20.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.3	6.3	10.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.3	.	10.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	36.8	25.0	20.0	50.0
0% of time (%)	42.1	50.0	20.0	30.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	72.7	37.5	100.0	85.7
Yes (%)	27.3	62.5	.	14.3
Total (N)	11	8	8	7

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	54.5	50.0	50.0	85.7
Yes (%)	45.5	50.0	50.0	14.3
Total (N)	11	8	8	7

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	81.8	62.5	75.0	100.0
Yes (%)	18.2	37.5	25.0	.
Total (N)	11	8	8	7

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	72.7	62.5	87.5	85.7
Yes (%)	27.3	37.5	12.5	14.3
Total (N)	11	8	8	7

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	54.5	50.0	75.0	42.9
Yes (%)	45.5	50.0	25.0	57.1
Total (N)	11	8	8	7

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.6	8.3	6.5	11.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	15.8	12.5	10.0	50.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	42.1	31.3	30.0	20.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	36.8	50.0	50.0	20.0
0% of time (%)	5.3	6.3	10.0	10.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	55.6	80.0	88.9	55.6
Yes (%)	44.4	20.0	11.1	44.4
Total (N)	18	15	9	9

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	22.2	13.3	11.1	22.2
Yes (%)	77.8	86.7	88.9	77.8
Total (N)	18	15	9	9

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	50.0	20.0	33.3	33.3
Yes (%)	50.0	80.0	66.7	66.7
Total (N)	18	15	9	9

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	88.9	73.3	55.6	66.7
Yes (%)	11.1	26.7	44.4	33.3
Total (N)	18	15	9	9

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	77.8	53.3	33.3	55.6
Yes (%)	22.2	46.7	66.7	44.4
Total (N)	18	15	9	9

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.7	0.0	0.6	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.3	.	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	10.5	.	20.0	.
0% of time (%)	84.2	100.0	80.0	100.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	4.3	10.8	11.2	8.5
more than 50% of time (%)	.	6.3	.	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	5.3	6.3	20.0	10.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	10.5	12.5	10.0	20.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	6.3	10.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	21.1	18.8	10.0	.
0% of time (%)	63.2	50.0	50.0	70.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	36.8	50.0	40.0	50.0
Yes (%)	63.2	50.0	60.0	50.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	94.7	81.3	100.0	80.0
Yes (%)	5.3	18.8	.	20.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	84.2	68.8	90.0	70.0
Yes (%)	15.8	31.3	10.0	30.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	94.7	93.8	80.0	80.0
Yes (%)	5.3	6.3	20.0	20.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	63.2	62.5	40.0	70.0
Yes (%)	36.8	37.5	60.0	30.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	73.7	62.5	70.0	30.0
Yes (%)	26.3	37.5	30.0	70.0
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	93.8	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	.	6.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	16	10	10

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Never (%)	16.7	25.0	20.0	10.0
A few times (%)	44.4	25.0	60.0	40.0
About once per month (%)	11.1	.	10.0	10.0
Two or three times per month (%)	5.6	37.5	10.0	10.0
At least once per week (%)	22.2	12.5	.	30.0