North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Natural Resources
by Race/Ethnicity 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	White	Faculty of Color
..... No (%)	81.1	100.0
..... Yes (%)	18.9	.
Total (N)	53	8

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	50.9	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.9	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	53	8

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	53.8	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	17.3	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	52	6

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.3	42.9
3: Agree (%)	57.7	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.3	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	52	7

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.0	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	32.7	42.9
4: Strong (%)	44.2	42.9
3: Average (%)	17.3	14.3
2: Weak (%)	5.8	.
Total (N)	52	7

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	19.2	.
4: Strong (%)	59.6	71.4
3: Average (%)	7.7	28.6
2: Weak (%)	11.5	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	52	7

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	19.2	12.5
4: Strong (%)	53.8	62.5
3: Average (%)	19.2	25.0
2: Weak (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	52	8

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	4.0
4: Strong (%)	19.0	100.0
3: Average (%)	38.1	.
2: Weak (%)	33.3	.
1: Very weak (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	21	2

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	7.7	.
4: Strong (%)	35.9	83.3
3: Average (%)	38.5	16.7
2: Weak (%)	15.4	.
1: Very weak (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	6

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.3	4.4
5: Very strong (%)	52.1	42.9
4: Strong (%)	35.4	57.1
3: Average (%)	6.3	.
2: Weak (%)	4.2	.
1: Very weak (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	7

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	23.4	16.7
4: Strong (%)	44.7	50.0
3: Average (%)	19.1	33.3
2: Weak (%)	8.5	.
1: Very weak (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	6

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0
A (%)	15.4	12.5
B (%)	61.5	75.0
C (%)	15.4	12.5
D (%)	3.8	.
F (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	52	8

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	38.5	12.5
B (%)	44.2	87.5
C (%)	15.4	.
D (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	52	8

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.5
A (%)	41.5	50.0
B (%)	41.5	50.0
C (%)	15.1	.
F (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	53	8

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.1	4.3
A (%)	34.0	25.0
B (%)	47.2	75.0
C (%)	13.2	.
D (%)	3.8	.
F (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	53	8

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4
A (%)	45.3	37.5
B (%)	47.2	62.5
C (%)	7.5	.
Total (N)	53	8

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.3
A (%)	41.5	25.0
B (%)	52.8	75.0
C (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	53	8

B4: Department's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	30.2	25.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	41.5	50.0
No clear vision (%)	22.6	25.0
Not familiar (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	53	8

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	60.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	6

B6: College's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	30.2	12.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	28.3	37.5
No clear vision (%)	28.3	12.5
Not familiar (%)	13.2	37.5
Total (N)	53	8

B7a: Department change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	67.9	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	15.1	12.5
Not really change (%)	17.0	37.5
Total (N)	53	8

B7b: College change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	54.7	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	13.2	.
Not really change (%)	32.1	50.0
Total (N)	53	8

B7c: NC State change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	49.1	50.0
Change for the worse (%)	15.1	.
Not really change (%)	35.8	50.0
Total (N)	53	8

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	39.6	37.5
3: Good (%)	28.3	50.0
2: Fair (%)	18.9	12.5
1: Poor (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	53	8

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	38.5	37.5
3: Good (%)	34.6	50.0
2: Fair (%)	17.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	9.6	.
Total (N)	52	8

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	32.1	28.6
3: Good (%)	43.4	57.1
2: Fair (%)	11.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	53	7

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	28.0	37.5
3: Good (%)	50.0	25.0
2: Fair (%)	12.0	37.5
1: Poor (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	50	8

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.7
4: Excellent (%)	52.9	71.4
3: Good (%)	25.5	28.6
2: Fair (%)	11.8	.
1: Poor (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	51	7

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	16.0	28.6
3: Good (%)	34.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	34.0	28.6
1: Poor (%)	16.0	.
Total (N)	50	7

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	37.7	25.0
3: Good (%)	32.1	50.0
2: Fair (%)	13.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	17.0	.
Total (N)	53	8

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	23.9	14.3
3: Good (%)	43.5	42.9
2: Fair (%)	10.9	28.6
1: Poor (%)	21.7	14.3
Total (N)	46	7

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.1	12.5
3: Good (%)	43.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	22.6	25.0
1: Poor (%)	18.9	12.5
Total (N)	53	8

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	23.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	45.1	50.0
2: Fair (%)	21.6	33.3
1: Poor (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	51	6

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	44.9	37.5
3: Good (%)	36.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	12.2	12.5
1: Poor (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	49	8

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	57.1	62.5
3: Good (%)	30.6	25.0
2: Fair (%)	6.1	12.5
1: Poor (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	49	8

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	16.7
3: Good (%)	44.2	83.3
2: Fair (%)	15.4	.
1: Poor (%)	9.6	.
Total (N)	52	6

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	26.9	33.3
3: Good (%)	48.1	33.3
2: Fair (%)	11.5	33.3
1: Poor (%)	13.5	.
Total (N)	52	6

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	39.6	.
3: Good (%)	47.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	8.3	37.5
1: Poor (%)	4.2	12.5
Total (N)	48	8

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	8.5	14.3
3: Good (%)	51.1	85.7
2: Fair (%)	27.7	.
1: Poor (%)	12.8	.
Total (N)	47	7

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	4.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	52.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	23.9	33.3
1: Poor (%)	19.6	.
Total (N)	46	6

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	9.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	45.2	66.7
2: Fair (%)	26.2	16.7
1: Poor (%)	19.0	.
Total (N)	42	6

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	30.2	42.9
3: Good (%)	55.8	57.1
2: Fair (%)	7.0	.
1: Poor (%)	7.0	.
Total (N)	43	7

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	14.0	.
3: Good (%)	34.9	100.0
2: Fair (%)	27.9	.
1: Poor (%)	23.3	.
Total (N)	43	6

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	9.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	48.8	83.3
2: Fair (%)	16.3	.
1: Poor (%)	25.6	.
Total (N)	43	6

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	14.7	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	75.0
2: Fair (%)	23.5	25.0
1: Poor (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	34	4

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	17.0	14.3
3: Good (%)	40.4	42.9
2: Fair (%)	23.4	28.6
1: Poor (%)	19.1	14.3
Total (N)	47	7

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	7.0	20.0
3: Good (%)	48.8	60.0
2: Fair (%)	27.9	20.0
1: Poor (%)	16.3	.
Total (N)	43	5

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	16.7
3: Good (%)	52.5	83.3
2: Fair (%)	12.5	.
1: Poor (%)	5.0	.
Total (N)	40	6

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	34.1	50.0
3: Good (%)	61.4	50.0
1: Poor (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	44	8

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	16.7
3: Good (%)	61.9	83.3
2: Fair (%)	11.9	.
1: Poor (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	42	6

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	17.1	20.0
3: Good (%)	51.2	80.0
2: Fair (%)	24.4	.
1: Poor (%)	7.3	.
Total (N)	41	5

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	53.3	28.6
3: Good (%)	37.8	42.9
2: Fair (%)	2.2	14.3
1: Poor (%)	6.7	14.3
Total (N)	45	7

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	2.0	.
3: Good (%)	36.7	83.3
2: Fair (%)	40.8	16.7
1: Poor (%)	20.4	.
Total (N)	49	6

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	5.0	20.0
3: Good (%)	32.5	60.0
2: Fair (%)	40.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	22.5	.
Total (N)	40	5

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	4.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	47.8	66.7
2: Fair (%)	28.3	.
1: Poor (%)	19.6	.
Total (N)	46	6

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	40.0
3: Good (%)	45.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	12.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	17.5	.
Total (N)	40	5

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	28.3	42.9
3: Good (%)	50.0	57.1
2: Fair (%)	13.0	.
1: Poor (%)	8.7	.
Total (N)	46	7

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	7.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	48.8	83.3
2: Fair (%)	22.0	.
1: Poor (%)	22.0	.
Total (N)	41	6

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	2.7	20.0
3: Good (%)	51.4	60.0
2: Fair (%)	18.9	20.0
1: Poor (%)	27.0	.
Total (N)	37	5

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	36.2	14.3
3: Good (%)	44.7	42.9
2: Fair (%)	12.8	28.6
1: Poor (%)	6.4	14.3
Total (N)	47	7

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.4	71.4
3: Agree (%)	34.0	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	53	7

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.2	57.1
3: Agree (%)	49.1	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	53	7

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	42.9
3: Agree (%)	36.5	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	52	7

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.5	28.6
3: Agree (%)	57.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.8	.
Total (N)	52	7

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	14.3
3: Agree (%)	45.3	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	34.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.3	.
Total (N)	53	7

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very familiar (%)	26.9	25.0
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	51.9	62.5
2: Not very familiar (%)	17.3	12.5
1: Not at all familiar (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	52	8

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
4: Very well (%)	3.8	.
3: Fairly well (%)	20.8	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	58.5	62.5
1: Not at all (%)	17.0	12.5
Total (N)	53	8

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
3: Fairly well (%)	34.0	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	50.9	62.5
1: Not at all (%)	15.1	12.5
Total (N)	53	8

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very well (%)	7.5	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	50.9	12.5
2: Not very well (%)	28.3	75.0
1: Not at all (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	53	8

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very well (%)	28.3	12.5
3: Fairly well (%)	45.3	37.5
2: Not very well (%)	13.2	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	53	8

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.2	.
3: Agree (%)	54.7	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.4	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	.
Total (N)	53	7

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.3	71.4
3: Agree (%)	30.2	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	5.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	53	7

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	45.3	57.1
3: Good (%)	37.7	28.6
2: Fair (%)	13.2	14.3
1: Poor (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	53	7

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	26.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	42.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	28.0	.
1: Poor (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	6

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	17.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	45.0	83.3
2: Fair (%)	25.0	.
1: Poor (%)	12.5	.
Total (N)	40	6

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.7	20.0
3: Good (%)	44.4	40.0
2: Fair (%)	35.6	40.0
1: Poor (%)	13.3	.
Total (N)	45	5

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.0	.
Total (N)	42	6

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	16.7
3: Agree (%)	47.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.4	.
Total (N)	38	6

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	33.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	41.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.4	.
Total (N)	36	5

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	28.6	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	47.6	100.0
2: Not very effective (%)	23.8	.
Total (N)	21	3

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.9
4: Very important (%)	44.2	85.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	46.2	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	7.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	52	7

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.7
4: Very important (%)	45.1	71.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	39.2	28.6
2: Not very important (%)	11.8	.
1: Not at all important (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	51	7

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.4
4: Very important (%)	29.5	71.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.8	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	31.8	.
1: Not at all important (%)	6.8	14.3
Total (N)	44	7

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.5	.
3: Agree (%)	70.2	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	17.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	6

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.0	.
3: Agree (%)	57.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	5

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.2	.
3: Agree (%)	61.9	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	5

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.0	.
3: Agree (%)	56.1	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	41	5

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.2	.
3: Agree (%)	62.5	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	5

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.2	.
3: Agree (%)	62.8	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	43	4

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.0	.
3: Agree (%)	64.3	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	42	4

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.9	66.7
3: Agree (%)	37.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	51	6

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.5	80.0
3: Agree (%)	40.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	40	5

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	6

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	37.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	40	3

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	35.4	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	6

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	39.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	51	6

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.5	60.0
3: Agree (%)	46.5	40.0
Total (N)	43	5

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	60.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	38	5

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.3	71.4
3: Agree (%)	35.4	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	7

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.5	71.4
3: Agree (%)	35.7	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	7

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.4	71.4
3: Agree (%)	37.5	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	48	7

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	62.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	35.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	40	4

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.7	71.4
3: Agree (%)	39.1	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	7

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.4	66.7
3: Agree (%)	40.4	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	47	6

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	56.1	60.0
3: Agree (%)	43.9	40.0
Total (N)	41	5

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.3	66.7
3: Agree (%)	34.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	38	6

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	26.0	28.6
3: Some (%)	44.0	71.4
2: A little (%)	22.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	50	7

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	12.8	16.7
3: Some (%)	23.1	33.3
2: A little (%)	30.8	.
1: Not at all (%)	33.3	50.0
Total (N)	39	6

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: A great deal (%)	52.9	71.4
3: Some (%)	31.4	14.3
2: A little (%)	7.8	14.3
1: None (%)	7.8	.
Total (N)	51	7

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	37.3	16.7
3: Some (%)	27.5	66.7
2: A little (%)	11.8	.
1: None (%)	23.5	16.7
Total (N)	51	6

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	13.7	.
3: Some (%)	25.5	16.7
2: A little (%)	19.6	50.0
1: None (%)	41.2	33.3
Total (N)	51	6

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	29.4	14.3
3: Some (%)	25.5	28.6
2: A little (%)	19.6	42.9
1: None (%)	25.5	14.3
Total (N)	51	7

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	19.6	16.7
3: Some (%)	17.6	16.7
2: A little (%)	17.6	33.3
1: None (%)	45.1	33.3
Total (N)	51	6

E9f: Interest in advising international students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	14.3
3: Some (%)	39.2	85.7
2: A little (%)	13.7	.
1: None (%)	13.7	.
Total (N)	51	7

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	39.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.6	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	51	5

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.1	40.0
3: Agree (%)	48.9	60.0
Total (N)	47	5

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.8	40.0
3: Agree (%)	59.1	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	44	5

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.5	20.0
3: Agree (%)	56.9	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	51	5

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	54.2	.
2: Disagree (%)	29.2	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	48	3

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	.
3: Agree (%)	55.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	38	3

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.2	40.0
3: Agree (%)	49.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.8	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	51	5

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
Frequently (%)	23.5	40.0
Sometimes (%)	47.1	20.0
Seldom (%)	5.9	40.0
Never (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	51	5

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
Frequently (%)	43.1	40.0
Sometimes (%)	45.1	40.0
Seldom (%)	2.0	.
Never (%)	9.8	20.0
Total (N)	51	5

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
Frequently (%)	35.3	60.0
Sometimes (%)	39.2	20.0
Seldom (%)	11.8	.
Never (%)	13.7	20.0
Total (N)	51	5

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
Frequently (%)	37.3	20.0
Sometimes (%)	43.1	80.0
Seldom (%)	11.8	.
Never (%)	7.8	.
Total (N)	51	5

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	1.8
Frequently (%)	11.8	.
Sometimes (%)	37.3	20.0
Seldom (%)	27.5	40.0
Never (%)	23.5	40.0
Total (N)	51	5

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
Frequently (%)	74.5	100.0
Sometimes (%)	17.6	.
Seldom (%)	5.9	.
Never (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	51	5

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
Frequently (%)	33.3	60.0
Sometimes (%)	45.1	20.0
Seldom (%)	17.6	.
Never (%)	3.9	20.0
Total (N)	51	5

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
Frequently (%)	38.0	40.0
Sometimes (%)	46.0	20.0
Seldom (%)	14.0	20.0
Never (%)	2.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	2.2
Frequently (%)	56.0	.
Sometimes (%)	32.0	40.0
Seldom (%)	6.0	40.0
Never (%)	6.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.9	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.3	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	39	5

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	5

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	59.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	28.2	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.1	.
Total (N)	39	5

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	76.9	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	20.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	5

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	48.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.8	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.1	.
Total (N)	39	5

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.3	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	65.9	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.1	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	41	5

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.2	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	48	5

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	40.5	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.6	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.5	.
Total (N)	37	5

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.5	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	43.9	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.2	.
Total (N)	41	4

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.5	40.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	5

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.6	75.0
3: Agree (%)	59.2	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	49	4

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	100.0
3: Agree (%)	77.8	.
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	18	1

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	45.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	.
Total (N)	40	2

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	25.0
Total (N)	44	4

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	47.9	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	48	3

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
3: Agree (%)	64.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	14	1

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.0	50.0
Total (N)	40	2

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.6	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.3	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	20.0
Total (N)	38	5

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	48.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.1	.
Total (N)	33	2

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.0	.
Total (N)	40	5

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.1	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	48.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.2	.
Total (N)	33	3

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.5	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.2	25.0
Total (N)	41	4

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	82.4	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	34	3

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.2	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	45	5

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.2	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.4	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.6	.
Total (N)	41	2

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	43.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.9	.
Total (N)	39	2

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	62.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.0	.
Total (N)	40	2

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.4	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.6	25.0
Total (N)	41	4

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.0	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.8	.
Total (N)	39	3

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.0	.
Total (N)	40	3

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	White	Faculty of Color
Yes (%)	11.8	.
No (%)	82.4	100.0
Don't know (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	51	5

G6: Mentor helpfulness	White
Mean Rating	3.5
4: Very helpful (%)	66.7
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	16.7
2: Not very helpful (%)	16.7
Total (N)	6

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.9	.
Total (N)	45	3

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.8	.
Total (N)	45	2

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.0	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	55.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	40	3

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	38	2

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	38.5	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.8	50.0
Total (N)	39	2

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	4.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	100.0
3: Satisfied (%)	34.3	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.7	.
Total (N)	35	1

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	26.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	34.2	50.0
Total (N)	38	2

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	54.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	18.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.7	100.0
3: Agree (%)	51.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	10.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	49	3

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	48.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.4	.
Total (N)	47	4

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	51.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	41	4

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.6	75.0
3: Agree (%)	58.7	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	.
Total (N)	46	4

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	42.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	.
Total (N)	49	4

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.5	50.0
3: Agree (%)	57.1	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.2	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	.
Total (N)	49	4

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	40.8	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.4	50.0
Total (N)	49	4

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.6	.
3: Agree (%)	48.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	25.0
Total (N)	45	4

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very well (%)	28.0	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	75.0
2: Not very well (%)	14.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	36.0	40.0
Yes (%)	64.0	60.0
Total (N)	50	5

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	40.0	80.0
Yes (%)	60.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	46.0	100.0
Yes (%)	54.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	84.0	80.0
Yes (%)	16.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Very well (%)	36.0	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	42.0	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	18.0	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8
4: Very well (%)	42.0	75.0
3: Fairly well (%)	36.0	25.0
2: Not very well (%)	20.0	.
1: Not at all (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.0	66.7
3: Agree (%)	51.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	41	3

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	100.0
3: Agree (%)	43.6	.
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	3

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	56.5	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	46	4

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.9	25.0
3: Agree (%)	52.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	.
Total (N)	46	4

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	.
Total (N)	10	2

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.5	.
3: Agree (%)	54.8	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.1	.
Total (N)	31	2

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	.
3: Agree (%)	47.4	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	.
Total (N)	38	3

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.6	.
3: Agree (%)	42.2	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	31.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	45	3

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	.
3: Agree (%)	60.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	45	3

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.2	.
3: Agree (%)	46.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.6	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.4	.
Total (N)	47	2

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
3: Agree (%)	55.6	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	44.4	.
Total (N)	9	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.
3: Agree (%)	66.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	30	2

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.5	.
3: Agree (%)	52.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	.
Total (N)	40	2

H13f: Department rewards professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.9	.
3: Agree (%)	47.7	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	.
Total (N)	44	2

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	White	Faculty of Color
Has experience (%)	68.1	50.0
No experience (%)	31.9	50.0
Total (N)	47	4

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	46.8	75.0
Yes (%)	53.2	25.0
Total (N)	47	4

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	55.3	100.0
Yes (%)	44.7	.
Total (N)	47	4

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	93.6	100.0
Yes (%)	6.4	.
Total (N)	47	4

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	95.7	100.0
Yes (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	4

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.9	66.7
3: Agree (%)	62.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	37	3

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	53.8	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	28.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	39	3

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	62.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	15.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	.
Total (N)	40	3

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.0	.
3: Agree (%)	65.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	40	3

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	.
3: Agree (%)	80.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	35	3

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	90.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	30	3

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.2	.
3: Agree (%)	64.5	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.9	.
Total (N)	31	2

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	68.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.6	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.1	.
Total (N)	35	2

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.3	.
3: Agree (%)	62.8	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.0	25.0
Total (N)	43	4

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	.
3: Agree (%)	55.9	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.7	.
Total (N)	34	4

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.9	.
3: Agree (%)	41.2	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.5	.
Total (N)	34	4

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.7	.
3: Agree (%)	46.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.1	33.3
Total (N)	26	3

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.4	.
3: Agree (%)	47.6	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	42	4

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very well (%)	12.0	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	38.0	.
2: Not very well (%)	18.0	50.0
1: Not at all (%)	32.0	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.0	.
3: Agree (%)	53.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.6	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.9	.
Total (N)	43	3

J4: I have access to benefits information	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	56.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
3: Agree (%)	18.8	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	45.8	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	35.4	25.0
Total (N)	48	4

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	25.0
3: Agree (%)	52.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.9	.
Total (N)	44	4

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.4	33.3
3: Agree (%)	70.3	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.8	.
Total (N)	37	3

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.0	.
3: Agree (%)	52.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	32.0	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	56.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.0	.
3: Agree (%)	56.0	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	24.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8
4: Very important (%)	84.0	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.0	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	64.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	34.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J11c: Importance of family leave time	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	58.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Very important (%)	68.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.0	.
2: Not very important (%)	4.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8
4: Very important (%)	52.0	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	32.0	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	14.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very important (%)	59.2	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	24.5	50.0
2: Not very important (%)	10.2	.
1: Not at all important (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	49	4

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.2	50.0
3: Agree (%)	32.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	34.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.4	.
Total (N)	49	4

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	44.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.2	25.0
3: Agree (%)	51.0	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.2	.
Total (N)	49	4

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	44.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	37.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.9	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.5	.
Total (N)	27	3

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.0	.
Total (N)	40	4

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	19	3

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.0	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.0	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.4	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.2	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	48	4

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.0	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.1	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	.
Total (N)	32	3

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	1.5
3: Satisfied (%)	22.0	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	40.0	50.0
Total (N)	50	4

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.6	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	12.2	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.6	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	57.1	25.0
Total (N)	49	4

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	1.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.1	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	100.0
Total (N)	18	1

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.9	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.7	.
Total (N)	23	2

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	74.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	4

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	46.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.3	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.2	.
Total (N)	49	4

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.7	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	34.7	.
Total (N)	49	4

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
3: Satisfied (%)	43.2	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.8	.
Total (N)	44	4

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
3: Satisfied (%)	46.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	48.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	41	4

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.4	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.5	.
Total (N)	47	4

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	45.2	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.1	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.9	.
Total (N)	42	3

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	35.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	41.9	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.6	.
Total (N)	31	2

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	30	3

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: A lot (%)	30.0	50.0
3: Some (%)	32.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	12.0	.
1: None at all (%)	26.0	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very likely (%)	36.0	25.0
3: Somewhat likely (%)	36.0	75.0
2: Not very likely (%)	14.0	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	14.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.2	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	75.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.2	.
Total (N)	49	4

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.5	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	69.2	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	39	4

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.2	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	78.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	41	4

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	71.9	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.6	.
Total (N)	32	1

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.5	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.5	.
Total (N)	37	2

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	36	3

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	4.5
Once a week or more (%)	46.9	25.0
A few times a month (%)	6.1	25.0
A few times a semester (%)	6.1	25.0
Once a semester (%)	.	25.0
Once a year (%)	4.1	.
Never (%)	36.7	.
Total (N)	49	4

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.8
Once a week or more (%)	14.3	25.0
A few times a month (%)	12.2	.
A few times a semester (%)	12.2	50.0
Once a semester (%)	8.2	.
Once a year (%)	8.2	.
Never (%)	44.9	25.0
Total (N)	49	4

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	4.1	.
A few times a month (%)	2.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	8.2	25.0
Once a semester (%)	8.2	.
Once a year (%)	8.2	.
Never (%)	69.4	75.0
Total (N)	49	4

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
A few times a month (%)	4.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	36.0	50.0
Once a semester (%)	12.0	.
Once a year (%)	14.0	.
Never (%)	34.0	50.0
Total (N)	50	4

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
A few times a month (%)	10.0	.
A few times a semester (%)	24.0	50.0
Once a semester (%)	12.0	.
Once a year (%)	20.0	.
Never (%)	34.0	50.0
Total (N)	50	4

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	30.0	25.0
3: Some (%)	10.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	22.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	38.0	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8
4: Very likely (%)	14.3	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	8.2	25.0
2: Not very likely (%)	16.3	25.0
1: Not at all likely (%)	61.2	50.0
Total (N)	49	4

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	White	Faculty of Color
Mean # Hrs Work	55.9	57.5
more than 60 hrs (%)	16.3	.
51 to 60 hrs (%)	36.7	100.0
41 to 50 hrs (%)	42.9	.
40 hrs or less (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	49	4

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	30.4	42.0
more than 50% of time (%)	12.0	20.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	38.0	60.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	30.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.0	.
0% of time (%)	4.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	27.1	.
Yes (%)	72.9	100.0
Total (N)	48	4

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	60.4	50.0
Yes (%)	39.6	50.0
Total (N)	48	4

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	22.9	25.0
Yes (%)	77.1	75.0
Total (N)	48	4

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	64.6	25.0
Yes (%)	35.4	75.0
Total (N)	48	4

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	16.7	25.0
Yes (%)	83.3	75.0
Total (N)	48	4

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.7	2.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	10.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	28.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	48.0	60.0
0% of time (%)	14.0	40.0
Total (N)	50	5

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	25.6	.
Yes (%)	74.4	100.0
Total (N)	43	3

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	41.9	.
Yes (%)	58.1	100.0
Total (N)	43	3

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	29.6	23.2
more than 50% of time (%)	12.0	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	38.0	40.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	18.0	20.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	22.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	2.0	20.0
0% of time (%)	8.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.5	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.0	.
0% of time (%)	94.0	100.0
Total (N)	50	5

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	14.9	2.0
more than 50% of time (%)	8.0	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	14.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	6.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	32.0	40.0
0% of time (%)	36.0	60.0
Total (N)	50	5

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	71.9	100.0
Yes (%)	28.1	.
Total (N)	32	2

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	59.4	50.0
Yes (%)	40.6	50.0
Total (N)	32	2

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	78.1	100.0
Yes (%)	21.9	.
Total (N)	32	2

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	75.0	100.0
Yes (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	32	2

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	59.4	.
Yes (%)	40.6	100.0
Total (N)	32	2

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	9.0	4.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	22.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	34.0	20.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	38.0	60.0
0% of time (%)	6.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	72.3	25.0
Yes (%)	27.7	75.0
Total (N)	47	4

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	19.1	.
Yes (%)	80.9	100.0
Total (N)	47	4

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	38.3	.
Yes (%)	61.7	100.0
Total (N)	47	4

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	76.6	50.0
Yes (%)	23.4	50.0
Total (N)	47	4

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	59.6	50.0
Yes (%)	40.4	50.0
Total (N)	47	4

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.4	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	8.0	.
0% of time (%)	90.0	100.0
Total (N)	50	5

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.4	6.0
more than 50% of time (%)	2.0	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	10.0	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.0	20.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	12.0	40.0
0% of time (%)	60.0	40.0
Total (N)	50	5

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	44.0	40.0
Yes (%)	56.0	60.0
Total (N)	50	5

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	88.0	100.0
Yes (%)	12.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	80.0	60.0
Yes (%)	20.0	40.0
Total (N)	50	5

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	88.0	100.0
Yes (%)	12.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	62.0	40.0
Yes (%)	38.0	60.0
Total (N)	50	5

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	60.0	80.0
Yes (%)	40.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	98.0	100.0
Yes (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	20.0	.
A few times (%)	40.0	50.0
About once per month (%)	8.0	.
Two or three times per month (%)	14.0	50.0
At least once per week (%)	18.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	44.0	50.0
Once or twice (%)	32.0	50.0
Three to five times (%)	12.0	.
Six to ten times (%)	8.0	.
More than 10 times (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	6.0	.
2 (%)	18.0	25.0
3 (%)	26.0	50.0
4 (%)	40.0	25.0
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

M7: Change how you spend your work time	White	Faculty of Color
I would change how I spent time (%)	80.4	100.0
I would not change a thing (%)	19.6	.
Total (N)	46	3

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.0	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	48.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	44.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.2	75.0
3: Agree (%)	36.7	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	49	4

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.0	100.0
3: Agree (%)	36.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.0	75.0
3: Agree (%)	60.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.8	60.0
3: Agree (%)	37.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	48	5

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	22.7	25.0
3: Some (%)	34.1	50.0
2: A little (%)	22.7	25.0
1: None at all (%)	20.5	.
Total (N)	44	4

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	32.7	25.0
3: Some (%)	32.7	25.0
2: A little (%)	22.4	25.0
1: None at all (%)	12.2	25.0
Total (N)	49	4

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	12.0	.
3: Some (%)	32.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	24.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	32.0	50.0
Total (N)	50	4

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	34.7	.
3: Some (%)	26.5	25.0
2: A little (%)	22.4	25.0
1: None at all (%)	16.3	50.0
Total (N)	49	4

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	8.0	.
3: Some (%)	38.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	38.0	50.0
1: None at all (%)	16.0	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	4.0	.
3: Some (%)	24.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	24.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	48.0	50.0
Total (N)	50	4

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	8.0	.
3: Some (%)	18.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	32.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	42.0	50.0
Total (N)	50	4

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	14.3	.
3: Some (%)	22.4	50.0
2: A little (%)	30.6	25.0
1: None at all (%)	32.7	25.0
Total (N)	49	4

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.5
4: A great deal (%)	10.2	.
3: Some (%)	22.4	.
2: A little (%)	34.7	50.0
1: None at all (%)	32.7	50.0
Total (N)	49	4

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	44.0	50.0
3: Some (%)	40.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	16.0	.
1: None at all (%)	.	25.0
Total (N)	50	4

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	40.0	25.0
3: Some (%)	40.0	25.0
2: A little (%)	14.0	50.0
1: None at all (%)	6.0	.
Total (N)	50	4

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	20.8	33.3
3: Some (%)	41.7	.
2: A little (%)	29.2	66.7
1: None at all (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	48	3

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	10.4	.
3: Some (%)	41.7	25.0
2: A little (%)	37.5	25.0
1: None at all (%)	10.4	50.0
Total (N)	48	4

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	19.6	25.0
3: Some (%)	34.8	.
2: A little (%)	28.3	25.0
1: None at all (%)	17.4	50.0
Total (N)	46	4

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.0
A lot more satisfied now (%)	16.0	.
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	30.0	.
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	18.0	20.0
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	20.0	60.0
A lot less satisfied now (%)	16.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	26.0	40.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	20.0	.
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	30.0	40.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	24.0	20.0
Total (N)	50	5

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	42.0	60.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	20.0	20.0
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	24.0	20.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	14.0	.
Total (N)	50	5

Endnote:

1. "Faculty of Color" includes African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American respondents. Due to small cell sizes at this level of analysis,
this categorization of race/ethnicity was necessary to protect respondent confidentiality. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007