North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Natural Resources
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	81.3	92.3
..... Yes (%)	18.8	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.9	30.8
3: Agree (%)	52.1	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.8	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	48	13

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.8	30.8
3: Agree (%)	60.0	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	17.8	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	15.4
Total (N)	45	13

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	30.8
3: Agree (%)	60.9	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	15.4
Total (N)	46	13

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	27.7	58.3
4: Strong (%)	51.1	16.7
3: Average (%)	14.9	25.0
2: Weak (%)	6.4	.
Total (N)	47	12

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0
5: Very strong (%)	14.9	25.0
4: Strong (%)	61.7	58.3
3: Average (%)	10.6	8.3
2: Weak (%)	10.6	8.3
1: Very weak (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	47	12

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	20.8	8.3
4: Strong (%)	54.2	58.3
3: Average (%)	18.8	25.0
2: Weak (%)	6.3	8.3
Total (N)	48	12

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strong (%)	27.8	20.0
3: Average (%)	33.3	40.0
2: Weak (%)	27.8	40.0
1: Very weak (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	5

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	5.7	10.0
4: Strong (%)	42.9	40.0
3: Average (%)	37.1	30.0
2: Weak (%)	14.3	10.0
1: Very weak (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	35	10

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	48.8	58.3
4: Strong (%)	41.9	25.0
3: Average (%)	4.7	8.3
2: Weak (%)	2.3	8.3
1: Very weak (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	43	12

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	22.5	23.1
4: Strong (%)	50.0	30.8
3: Average (%)	22.5	15.4
2: Weak (%)	2.5	23.1
1: Very weak (%)	2.5	7.7
Total (N)	40	13

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.9	3.7
A (%)	14.9	15.4
B (%)	63.8	61.5
C (%)	17.0	7.7
D (%)	2.1	7.7
F (%)	2.1	7.7
Total (N)	47	13

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	35.4	33.3
B (%)	50.0	50.0
C (%)	14.6	8.3
D (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	48	12

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.2
A (%)	37.5	61.5
B (%)	50.0	15.4
C (%)	12.5	15.4
F (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	3.9
A (%)	31.3	38.5
B (%)	56.3	30.8
C (%)	8.3	23.1
D (%)	4.2	.
F (%)	.	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.3
A (%)	43.8	46.2
B (%)	52.1	38.5
C (%)	4.2	15.4
Total (N)	48	13

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.2
A (%)	41.7	30.8
B (%)	54.2	61.5
C (%)	4.2	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	27.1	38.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	41.7	46.2
No clear vision (%)	25.0	15.4
Not familiar (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	48	13

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.4	27.3
3: Agree (%)	57.6	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	.
Total (N)	33	11

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	22.9	46.2
Vision with slow progress (%)	31.3	23.1
No clear vision (%)	27.1	23.1
Not familiar (%)	18.8	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	66.7	61.5
Change for the worse (%)	12.5	23.1
Not really change (%)	20.8	15.4
Total (N)	48	13

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	47.9	76.9
Change for the worse (%)	14.6	.
Not really change (%)	37.5	23.1
Total (N)	48	13

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	47.9	53.8
Change for the worse (%)	14.6	7.7
Not really change (%)	37.5	38.5
Total (N)	48	13

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	41.7	30.8
3: Good (%)	31.3	30.8
2: Fair (%)	16.7	23.1
1: Poor (%)	10.4	15.4
Total (N)	48	13

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	36.2	46.2
3: Good (%)	38.3	30.8
2: Fair (%)	14.9	23.1
1: Poor (%)	10.6	.
Total (N)	47	13

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	34.0	23.1
3: Good (%)	42.6	53.8
2: Fair (%)	10.6	15.4
1: Poor (%)	12.8	7.7
Total (N)	47	13

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	29.8	27.3
3: Good (%)	46.8	45.5
2: Fair (%)	12.8	27.3
1: Poor (%)	10.6	.
Total (N)	47	11

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	62.2	30.8
3: Good (%)	17.8	53.8
2: Fair (%)	8.9	15.4
1: Poor (%)	11.1	.
Total (N)	45	13

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	18.2	15.4
3: Good (%)	36.4	30.8
2: Fair (%)	31.8	38.5
1: Poor (%)	13.6	15.4
Total (N)	44	13

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	35.4	38.5
3: Good (%)	33.3	38.5
2: Fair (%)	14.6	15.4
1: Poor (%)	16.7	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	24.4	16.7
3: Good (%)	41.5	50.0
2: Fair (%)	12.2	16.7
1: Poor (%)	22.0	16.7
Total (N)	41	12

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	12.5	23.1
3: Good (%)	43.8	46.2
2: Fair (%)	27.1	7.7
1: Poor (%)	16.7	23.1
Total (N)	48	13

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	24.4	16.7
3: Good (%)	42.2	58.3
2: Fair (%)	24.4	16.7
1: Poor (%)	8.9	8.3
Total (N)	45	12

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	42.2	50.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	33.3
2: Fair (%)	11.1	16.7
1: Poor (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	45	12

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	56.8	61.5
3: Good (%)	31.8	23.1
2: Fair (%)	6.8	7.7
1: Poor (%)	4.5	7.7
Total (N)	44	13

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	38.5
3: Good (%)	51.1	38.5
2: Fair (%)	13.3	15.4
1: Poor (%)	8.9	7.7
Total (N)	45	13

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	28.9	23.1
3: Good (%)	46.7	46.2
2: Fair (%)	13.3	15.4
1: Poor (%)	11.1	15.4
Total (N)	45	13

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	34.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	52.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.1	25.0
1: Poor (%)	4.5	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	11.9	.
3: Good (%)	50.0	75.0
2: Fair (%)	26.2	16.7
1: Poor (%)	11.9	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.3	.
3: Good (%)	46.3	72.7
2: Fair (%)	26.8	18.2
1: Poor (%)	19.5	9.1
Total (N)	41	11

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	13.5	.
3: Good (%)	43.2	63.6
2: Fair (%)	24.3	27.3
1: Poor (%)	18.9	9.1
Total (N)	37	11

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	38.5	9.1
3: Good (%)	48.7	81.8
2: Fair (%)	5.1	9.1
1: Poor (%)	7.7	.
Total (N)	39	11

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	13.2	9.1
3: Good (%)	39.5	54.5
2: Fair (%)	23.7	27.3
1: Poor (%)	23.7	9.1
Total (N)	38	11

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	12.8	.
3: Good (%)	48.7	70.0
2: Fair (%)	12.8	20.0
1: Poor (%)	25.6	10.0
Total (N)	39	10

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	16.1	.
3: Good (%)	48.4	71.4
2: Fair (%)	25.8	14.3
1: Poor (%)	9.7	14.3
Total (N)	31	7

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	14.6	23.1
3: Good (%)	41.5	38.5
2: Fair (%)	22.0	30.8
1: Poor (%)	22.0	7.7
Total (N)	41	13

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	7.9	10.0
3: Good (%)	52.6	40.0
2: Fair (%)	23.7	40.0
1: Poor (%)	15.8	10.0
Total (N)	38	10

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	19.4	60.0
3: Good (%)	61.1	40.0
2: Fair (%)	13.9	.
1: Poor (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	36	10

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	42.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	55.0	75.0
1: Poor (%)	2.5	8.3
Total (N)	40	12

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	18.9	9.1
3: Good (%)	59.5	81.8
2: Fair (%)	13.5	.
1: Poor (%)	8.1	9.1
Total (N)	37	11

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	9.1
3: Good (%)	48.6	72.7
2: Fair (%)	25.7	9.1
1: Poor (%)	5.7	9.1
Total (N)	35	11

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	52.5	41.7
3: Good (%)	37.5	41.7
2: Fair (%)	2.5	8.3
1: Poor (%)	7.5	8.3
Total (N)	40	12

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	2.3	.
3: Good (%)	44.2	33.3
2: Fair (%)	34.9	50.0
1: Poor (%)	18.6	16.7
Total (N)	43	12

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	.
3: Good (%)	36.1	33.3
2: Fair (%)	38.9	33.3
1: Poor (%)	16.7	33.3
Total (N)	36	9

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	47.5	58.3
2: Fair (%)	25.0	25.0
1: Poor (%)	17.5	16.7
Total (N)	40	12

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	22.2	44.4
3: Good (%)	41.7	55.6
2: Fair (%)	16.7	.
1: Poor (%)	19.4	.
Total (N)	36	9

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	35.0	15.4
3: Good (%)	45.0	69.2
2: Fair (%)	12.5	7.7
1: Poor (%)	7.5	7.7
Total (N)	40	13

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	10.8	.
3: Good (%)	48.6	70.0
2: Fair (%)	21.6	10.0
1: Poor (%)	18.9	20.0
Total (N)	37	10

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	5.7	.
3: Good (%)	54.3	42.9
2: Fair (%)	17.1	28.6
1: Poor (%)	22.9	28.6
Total (N)	35	7

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	34.1	30.8
3: Good (%)	46.3	38.5
2: Fair (%)	12.2	23.1
1: Poor (%)	7.3	7.7
Total (N)	41	13

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.6	69.2
3: Agree (%)	36.2	23.1
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	47	13

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.6	69.2
3: Agree (%)	53.2	30.8
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	13

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	61.5
3: Agree (%)	39.1	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	46	13

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.2	15.4
3: Agree (%)	52.2	76.9
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	.
Total (N)	46	13

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.6	7.7
3: Agree (%)	44.7	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	31.9	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.8	.
Total (N)	47	13

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very familiar (%)	21.3	46.2
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	59.6	30.8
2: Not very familiar (%)	17.0	15.4
1: Not at all familiar (%)	2.1	7.7
Total (N)	47	13

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Very well (%)	2.1	7.7
3: Fairly well (%)	20.8	23.1
2: Not very well (%)	60.4	53.8
1: Not at all (%)	16.7	15.4
Total (N)	48	13

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
3: Fairly well (%)	31.3	38.5
2: Not very well (%)	52.1	53.8
1: Not at all (%)	16.7	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Very well (%)	4.2	23.1
3: Fairly well (%)	47.9	38.5
2: Not very well (%)	35.4	30.8
1: Not at all (%)	12.5	7.7
Total (N)	48	13

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very well (%)	25.0	30.8
3: Fairly well (%)	45.8	38.5
2: Not very well (%)	18.8	15.4
1: Not at all (%)	10.4	15.4
Total (N)	48	13

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.8	7.7
3: Agree (%)	59.6	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	23.4	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	7.7
Total (N)	47	13

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.4	84.6
3: Agree (%)	36.2	7.7
2: Disagree (%)	4.3	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	47	13

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	48.9	38.5
3: Good (%)	36.2	38.5
2: Fair (%)	10.6	23.1
1: Poor (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	47	13

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	32.6	15.4
3: Good (%)	39.5	53.8
2: Fair (%)	23.3	30.8
1: Poor (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	43	13

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	18.9	11.1
3: Good (%)	43.2	77.8
2: Fair (%)	27.0	.
1: Poor (%)	10.8	11.1
Total (N)	37	9

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	.
3: Good (%)	45.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	35.0	40.0
1: Poor (%)	10.0	20.0
Total (N)	40	10

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.8	9.1
3: Agree (%)	45.9	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.9	9.1
Total (N)	37	11

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.1	9.1
3: Agree (%)	45.5	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	24.2	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.2	9.1
Total (N)	33	11

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.5	10.0
3: Agree (%)	32.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	41.9	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.4	10.0
Total (N)	31	10

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very effective (%)	25.0	25.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	55.0	50.0
2: Not very effective (%)	20.0	25.0
Total (N)	20	4

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very important (%)	47.8	53.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.5	38.5
2: Not very important (%)	6.5	7.7
1: Not at all important (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	46	13

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8
4: Very important (%)	39.1	83.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.5	16.7
2: Not very important (%)	13.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	46	12

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.6
4: Very important (%)	25.6	66.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.8	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	33.3	8.3
1: Not at all important (%)	10.3	.
Total (N)	39	12

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.8	18.2
3: Agree (%)	76.2	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	9.1
Total (N)	42	11

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.6	9.1
3: Agree (%)	53.7	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	4.9	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	41	11

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.7	22.2
3: Agree (%)	68.4	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	9

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.8	22.2
3: Agree (%)	54.1	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.4	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.7	.
Total (N)	37	9

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.2	27.3
3: Agree (%)	69.0	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	11

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.9	22.2
3: Agree (%)	65.8	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	11.1
Total (N)	38	9

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.6	20.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	10.0
Total (N)	36	10

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	66.7
3: Agree (%)	40.0	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.4	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	45	12

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.8	88.9
3: Agree (%)	44.4	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	36	9

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	58.3
3: Agree (%)	40.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	80.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	5

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.1	70.0
3: Agree (%)	38.6	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	10

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	58.3
3: Agree (%)	42.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	8.3
Total (N)	45	12

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	70.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	30.0
Total (N)	38	10

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.5	60.0
3: Agree (%)	45.5	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	10.0
Total (N)	33	10

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.1	63.6
3: Agree (%)	34.1	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	11

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.5	77.8
3: Agree (%)	37.5	22.2
2: Disagree (%)	2.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	40	9

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.4	63.6
3: Agree (%)	36.4	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	11

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.3	100.0
3: Agree (%)	42.1	.
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	38	6

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.1	70.0
3: Agree (%)	39.5	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	43	10

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.1	63.6
3: Agree (%)	40.5	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	11

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.8	70.0
3: Agree (%)	47.2	30.0
Total (N)	36	10

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.9	60.0
3: Agree (%)	35.3	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	10.0
Total (N)	34	10

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	22.2	41.7
3: Some (%)	51.1	33.3
2: A little (%)	20.0	16.7
1: Not at all (%)	6.7	8.3
Total (N)	45	12

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	8.6	30.0
3: Some (%)	20.0	40.0
2: A little (%)	31.4	10.0
1: Not at all (%)	40.0	20.0
Total (N)	35	10

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	58.7	41.7
3: Some (%)	34.8	8.3
2: A little (%)	.	41.7
1: None (%)	6.5	8.3
Total (N)	46	12

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	35.6	33.3
3: Some (%)	37.8	8.3
2: A little (%)	8.9	16.7
1: None (%)	17.8	41.7
Total (N)	45	12

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	13.3	8.3
3: Some (%)	26.7	16.7
2: A little (%)	20.0	33.3
1: None (%)	40.0	41.7
Total (N)	45	12

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	28.3	25.0
3: Some (%)	30.4	8.3
2: A little (%)	23.9	16.7
1: None (%)	17.4	50.0
Total (N)	46	12

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	17.8	25.0
3: Some (%)	17.8	16.7
2: A little (%)	24.4	.
1: None (%)	40.0	58.3
Total (N)	45	12

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	30.4	33.3
3: Some (%)	47.8	33.3
2: A little (%)	13.0	8.3
1: None (%)	8.7	25.0
Total (N)	46	12

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.8	41.7
3: Agree (%)	38.6	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.3	63.6
3: Agree (%)	53.7	36.4
Total (N)	41	11

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	60.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	7.5	11.1
Total (N)	40	9

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	16.7
3: Agree (%)	54.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	44	12

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.8	10.0
3: Agree (%)	51.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.7	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.3	10.0
Total (N)	41	10

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	52.9	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.8	.
Total (N)	34	7

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.6	41.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.1
Frequently (%)	25.0	25.0
Sometimes (%)	38.6	66.7
Seldom (%)	11.4	.
Never (%)	25.0	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
Frequently (%)	45.5	33.3
Sometimes (%)	40.9	58.3
Seldom (%)	2.3	.
Never (%)	11.4	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
Frequently (%)	34.1	50.0
Sometimes (%)	38.6	33.3
Seldom (%)	11.4	8.3
Never (%)	15.9	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
Frequently (%)	34.1	41.7
Sometimes (%)	47.7	41.7
Seldom (%)	11.4	8.3
Never (%)	6.8	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
Frequently (%)	9.1	16.7
Sometimes (%)	34.1	41.7
Seldom (%)	27.3	33.3
Never (%)	29.5	8.3
Total (N)	44	12

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4
Frequently (%)	81.8	58.3
Sometimes (%)	13.6	25.0
Seldom (%)	2.3	16.7
Never (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	44	12

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
Frequently (%)	34.1	41.7
Sometimes (%)	43.2	41.7
Seldom (%)	15.9	16.7
Never (%)	6.8	.
Total (N)	44	12

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	39.5	33.3
Sometimes (%)	44.2	41.7
Seldom (%)	11.6	25.0
Never (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	43	12

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
Frequently (%)	56.8	27.3
Sometimes (%)	25.0	63.6
Seldom (%)	9.1	9.1
Never (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	44	11

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.2	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	20.0
Total (N)	34	10

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.5	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	10.0
Total (N)	34	10

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	52.9	60.0
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.8	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	10.0
Total (N)	34	10

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	76.5	70.0
3: Satisfied (%)	20.6	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	34	10

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	47.1	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	29.4	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	34	10

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.9	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.5	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	16.7
Total (N)	34	12

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	41.5	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	41	12

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	21.9	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	10.0
Total (N)	32	10

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	36	9

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.0	36.4
3: Agree (%)	47.5	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.0	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	40	11

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.6	25.0
3: Agree (%)	53.7	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	4.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	8.3
Total (N)	41	12

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	20.0
3: Agree (%)	85.7	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	40.0
Total (N)	14	5

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	44.4
3: Agree (%)	42.4	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	15.2	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	33	9

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.1	9.1
3: Agree (%)	54.1	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.5	9.1
Total (N)	37	11

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	51.3	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	8.3
Total (N)	39	12

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2
3: Agree (%)	80.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	10	5

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	20.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.1	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.6	20.0
Total (N)	32	10

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	32.4	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.9	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	.
Total (N)	34	9

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	53.6	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.7	14.3
Total (N)	28	7

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.0	62.5
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	37	8

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.3	.
Total (N)	30	6

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.9	44.4
3: Satisfied (%)	72.2	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.9	11.1
Total (N)	36	9

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	82.1	88.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	28	9

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.5	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.5	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.0	10.0
Total (N)	40	10

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.8	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	28.6
Total (N)	36	7

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	48.6	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	33.3
Total (N)	35	6

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.0	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	69.7	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.2	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.1	22.2
Total (N)	33	9

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.6	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.7	18.2
Total (N)	34	11

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.9	50.0
3: Satisfied (%)	60.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	43	12

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	71.9	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.6	.
Total (N)	32	10

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	12.5
Total (N)	35	8

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	11.4	8.3
No (%)	81.8	91.7
Don't know (%)	6.8	.
Total (N)	44	12

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	4.0
4: Very helpful (%)	60.0	100.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	20.0	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	20.0	.
Total (N)	5	1

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	45.0	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.5	12.5
Total (N)	40	8

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.8	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	59.0	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.9	12.5
Total (N)	39	8

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	52.8	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	14.3
Total (N)	36	7

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	28.6
Total (N)	33	7

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	38.2	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.4	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	29.4	42.9
Total (N)	34	7

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	32.3	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.7	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.8	20.0
Total (N)	31	5

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.1	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	34.3	40.0
Total (N)	35	5

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.8	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	47.5	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	8.3
Total (N)	40	12

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	41.7
3: Agree (%)	51.3	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.1	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	8.3
Total (N)	39	12

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.9	44.4
3: Agree (%)	52.8	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	36	9

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.2	41.7
3: Agree (%)	57.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	8.3
Total (N)	38	12

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.7	16.7
3: Agree (%)	39.0	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	22.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.3	8.3
Total (N)	41	12

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	58.5	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.3	8.3
Total (N)	41	12

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	43.9	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	26.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.1	33.3
Total (N)	41	12

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	9.1
3: Agree (%)	47.4	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	15.8	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	21.1	18.2
Total (N)	38	11

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very well (%)	28.6	25.0
3: Fairly well (%)	50.0	58.3
2: Not very well (%)	16.7	.
1: Not at all (%)	4.8	16.7
Total (N)	42	12

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	34.9	41.7
Yes (%)	65.1	58.3
Total (N)	43	12

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	41.9	50.0
Yes (%)	58.1	50.0
Total (N)	43	12

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	44.2	75.0
Yes (%)	55.8	25.0
Total (N)	43	12

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	83.7	83.3
Yes (%)	16.3	16.7
Total (N)	43	12

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very well (%)	33.3	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	42.9	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	23.8	.
1: Not at all (%)	.	16.7
Total (N)	42	12

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Very well (%)	45.2	41.7
3: Fairly well (%)	35.7	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	19.0	16.7
1: Not at all (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.9	75.0
3: Agree (%)	58.3	12.5
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	12.5
Total (N)	36	8

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.3	85.7
3: Agree (%)	45.7	14.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	35	7

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	9.1
3: Agree (%)	56.4	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.6	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	9.1
Total (N)	39	11

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	.
3: Agree (%)	51.3	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.6	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.7	9.1
Total (N)	39	11

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	50.0
Total (N)	8	4

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.4	.
3: Agree (%)	51.9	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	25.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.8	16.7
Total (N)	27	6

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.2	12.5
3: Agree (%)	45.5	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	30.3	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	12.5
Total (N)	33	8

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.2	9.1
3: Agree (%)	40.5	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	32.4	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.8	9.1
Total (N)	37	11

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	8.3
3: Agree (%)	55.6	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	8.3
Total (N)	36	12

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.5	18.2
3: Agree (%)	44.7	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	9.1
Total (N)	38	11

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
3: Agree (%)	71.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	50.0
Total (N)	7	4

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	.
3: Agree (%)	68.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	16.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	14.3
Total (N)	25	7

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	30.0
3: Agree (%)	59.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.4	.
Total (N)	32	10

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	18.2
3: Agree (%)	51.4	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.7	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.6	18.2
Total (N)	35	11

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	66.7	66.7
No experience (%)	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	42	9

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	47.6	55.6
Yes (%)	52.4	44.4
Total (N)	42	9

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	54.8	77.8
Yes (%)	45.2	22.2
Total (N)	42	9

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	92.9	100.0
Yes (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	42	9

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	95.2	100.0
Yes (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	42	9

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.5	.
3: Agree (%)	61.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.8	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	16.7
Total (N)	34	6

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	48.6	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	31.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	14.3
Total (N)	35	7

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.4	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	14.3
Total (N)	36	7

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	.
3: Agree (%)	63.9	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	14.3
Total (N)	36	7

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	78.8	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	.
Total (N)	33	5

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.9	.
3: Agree (%)	86.2	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	.
Total (N)	29	4

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.6	.
3: Agree (%)	64.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.7	20.0
Total (N)	28	5

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	71.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.1	16.7
Total (N)	31	6

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.9	11.1
3: Agree (%)	60.5	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	13.2	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.4	.
Total (N)	38	9

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	.
3: Agree (%)	53.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.6	.
Total (N)	32	6

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.1	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	80.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	24.2	.
Total (N)	33	5

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.2	.
Total (N)	24	5

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.8	.
3: Agree (%)	41.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	.
Total (N)	36	10

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Very well (%)	11.9	16.7
3: Fairly well (%)	35.7	33.3
2: Not very well (%)	19.0	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	33.3	25.0
Total (N)	42	12

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.9	10.0
3: Agree (%)	52.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.2	10.0
Total (N)	36	10

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.7	58.3
3: Agree (%)	59.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.1
3: Agree (%)	17.5	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.5	58.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	40.0	16.7
Total (N)	40	12

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.6	.
3: Agree (%)	47.4	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	34.2	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.8	10.0
Total (N)	38	10

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	.
3: Agree (%)	65.6	87.5
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.4	12.5
Total (N)	32	8

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.8	.
3: Agree (%)	47.6	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.9	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	41.7
3: Agree (%)	64.3	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	16.7
Total (N)	42	12

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	25.0
3: Agree (%)	64.3	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	16.7
Total (N)	42	12

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0
4: Very important (%)	78.6	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	57.1	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	40.5	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9
4: Very important (%)	52.4	91.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	45.2	8.3
1: Not at all important (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.9
4: Very important (%)	64.3	91.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	28.6	8.3
2: Not very important (%)	4.8	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.8
4: Very important (%)	45.2	83.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	35.7	16.7
2: Not very important (%)	16.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.8
4: Very important (%)	51.2	83.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.7	8.3
2: Not very important (%)	9.8	8.3
1: Not at all important (%)	7.3	.
Total (N)	41	12

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.6	16.7
3: Agree (%)	34.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	31.7	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.5	16.7
Total (N)	41	12

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	42.9	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.9	16.7
Total (N)	42	12

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	56.1	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	24.4	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.3	16.7
Total (N)	41	12

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.2	41.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	42	12

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.2	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.7	16.7
Total (N)	24	6

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.8	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.6	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	10.0
Total (N)	34	10

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.8	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.4	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	17	5

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.8	16.7
Total (N)	42	12

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	60.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	8.3
Total (N)	40	12

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	58.3
3: Satisfied (%)	61.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.5	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	59.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.2	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	42	12

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.6	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.1	25.0
Total (N)	31	4

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1
3: Satisfied (%)	16.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.1	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	45.2	25.0
Total (N)	42	12

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.5	2.0
3: Satisfied (%)	7.3	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	61.0	33.3
Total (N)	41	12

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	33.3
Total (N)	16	3

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	.
Total (N)	20	5

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	9.1
Total (N)	40	11

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.6
3: Satisfied (%)	40.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.0	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	61.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.5	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.6	.
Total (N)	41	12

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	29.3	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.8	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	39.0	8.3
Total (N)	41	12

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	51.4	27.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.5	72.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.1	.
Total (N)	37	11

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.9	66.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.
Total (N)	36	9

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.5	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	72.5	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.0	36.4
Total (N)	40	11

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	10.0
3: Satisfied (%)	45.7	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.7	30.0
Total (N)	35	10

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	1.8
3: Satisfied (%)	39.3	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.9	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.9	40.0
Total (N)	28	5

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	55.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	27	6

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: A lot (%)	35.7	16.7
3: Some (%)	28.6	41.7
2: A little (%)	11.9	8.3
1: None at all (%)	23.8	33.3
Total (N)	42	12

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very likely (%)	40.5	16.7
3: Somewhat likely (%)	33.3	58.3
2: Not very likely (%)	11.9	16.7
1: Not at all likely (%)	14.3	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.6	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	78.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.3	25.0
Total (N)	41	12

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	81.0	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.9	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.6	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	70.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.9	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	.
Total (N)	34	9

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	80.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	11.1
Total (N)	36	9

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.4	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	77.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.8	16.7
Total (N)	27	6

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.3	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	72.4	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.2	.
Total (N)	29	10

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	44.4
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	30	9

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.1	3.2
Once a week or more (%)	51.2	25.0
A few times a month (%)	9.8	.
A few times a semester (%)	2.4	25.0
Once a semester (%)	2.4	.
Once a year (%)	.	16.7
Never (%)	34.1	33.3
Total (N)	41	12

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
Once a week or more (%)	14.6	16.7
A few times a month (%)	12.2	8.3
A few times a semester (%)	17.1	8.3
Once a semester (%)	4.9	16.7
Once a year (%)	7.3	8.3
Never (%)	43.9	41.7
Total (N)	41	12

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.6	2.5
Once a week or more (%)	.	18.2
A few times a month (%)	2.4	.
A few times a semester (%)	7.1	18.2
Once a semester (%)	9.5	.
Once a year (%)	7.1	9.1
Never (%)	73.8	54.5
Total (N)	42	11

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	3.6
A few times a month (%)	2.4	8.3
A few times a semester (%)	31.0	58.3
Once a semester (%)	7.1	25.0
Once a year (%)	16.7	.
Never (%)	42.9	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	3.1
A few times a month (%)	7.1	16.7
A few times a semester (%)	23.8	33.3
Once a semester (%)	9.5	16.7
Once a year (%)	21.4	8.3
Never (%)	38.1	25.0
Total (N)	42	12

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	28.6	33.3
3: Some (%)	14.3	.
2: A little (%)	19.0	33.3
1: None at all (%)	38.1	33.3
Total (N)	42	12

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1
4: Very likely (%)	7.1	36.4
3: Somewhat likely (%)	11.9	.
2: Not very likely (%)	21.4	.
1: Not at all likely (%)	59.5	63.6
Total (N)	42	11

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	56.4	54.8
more than 60 hrs (%)	17.1	8.3
51 to 60 hrs (%)	41.5	41.7
41 to 50 hrs (%)	36.6	50.0
40 hrs or less (%)	4.9	.
Total (N)	41	12

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	28.8	41.0
more than 50% of time (%)	4.7	41.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	46.5	16.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	27.9	25.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	9.3	8.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.0	.
0% of time (%)	4.7	8.3
Total (N)	43	12

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	26.8	18.2
Yes (%)	73.2	81.8
Total (N)	41	11

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	58.5	63.6
Yes (%)	41.5	36.4
Total (N)	41	11

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	24.4	18.2
Yes (%)	75.6	81.8
Total (N)	41	11

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	61.0	63.6
Yes (%)	39.0	36.4
Total (N)	41	11

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	14.6	27.3
Yes (%)	85.4	72.7
Total (N)	41	11

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.0	7.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.0	16.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	25.6	25.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	48.8	50.0
0% of time (%)	18.6	8.3
Total (N)	43	12

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	22.9	27.3
Yes (%)	77.1	72.7
Total (N)	35	11

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	37.1	45.5
Yes (%)	62.9	54.5
Total (N)	35	11

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	30.6	23.4
more than 50% of time (%)	11.6	8.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	41.9	25.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	18.6	16.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	20.9	16.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	16.7
0% of time (%)	7.0	16.7
Total (N)	43	12

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.6	0.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.3	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.7	.
0% of time (%)	93.0	100.0
Total (N)	43	12

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	14.2	12.3
more than 50% of time (%)	7.0	8.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	14.0	8.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.7	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	32.6	33.3
0% of time (%)	34.9	50.0
Total (N)	43	12

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	71.4	83.3
Yes (%)	28.6	16.7
Total (N)	28	6

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	57.1	66.7
Yes (%)	42.9	33.3
Total (N)	28	6

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	78.6	83.3
Yes (%)	21.4	16.7
Total (N)	28	6

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	75.0	83.3
Yes (%)	25.0	16.7
Total (N)	28	6

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	57.1	50.0
Yes (%)	42.9	50.0
Total (N)	28	6

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.6	8.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.3	8.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	27.9	50.0
1% to 5% of time (%)	39.5	41.7
0% of time (%)	9.3	.
Total (N)	43	12

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	66.7	75.0
Yes (%)	33.3	25.0
Total (N)	39	12

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	17.9	16.7
Yes (%)	82.1	83.3
Total (N)	39	12

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	30.8	50.0
Yes (%)	69.2	50.0
Total (N)	39	12

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	74.4	75.0
Yes (%)	25.6	25.0
Total (N)	39	12

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	56.4	66.7
Yes (%)	43.6	33.3
Total (N)	39	12

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.5	0.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.3	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	9.3	.
0% of time (%)	88.4	100.0
Total (N)	43	12

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.3	7.8
more than 50% of time (%)	2.3	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	9.3	8.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	14.0	8.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	16.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.6	25.0
0% of time (%)	62.8	41.7
Total (N)	43	12

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	41.9	50.0
Yes (%)	58.1	50.0
Total (N)	43	12

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	88.4	91.7
Yes (%)	11.6	8.3
Total (N)	43	12

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	72.1	100.0
Yes (%)	27.9	.
Total (N)	43	12

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	86.0	100.0
Yes (%)	14.0	.
Total (N)	43	12

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	55.8	75.0
Yes (%)	44.2	25.0
Total (N)	43	12

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	62.8	58.3
Yes (%)	37.2	41.7
Total (N)	43	12

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	97.7	100.0
Yes (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	43	12

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	19.0	16.7
A few times (%)	42.9	33.3
About once per month (%)	7.1	8.3
Two or three times per month (%)	16.7	16.7
At least once per week (%)	14.3	25.0
Total (N)	42	12

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	42.9	50.0
Once or twice (%)	33.3	33.3
Three to five times (%)	14.3	.
Six to ten times (%)	4.8	16.7
More than 10 times (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	42	12

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	7.1	.
2 (%)	14.3	33.3
3 (%)	31.0	16.7
4 (%)	38.1	41.7
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	9.5	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	87.2	60.0
I would not change a thing (%)	12.8	40.0
Total (N)	39	10

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	39.5	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	46.5	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.6	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	16.7
Total (N)	43	12

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.9	33.3
3: Agree (%)	44.2	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.3	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	16.7
Total (N)	43	12

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.5	63.6
3: Agree (%)	35.7	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	11

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	66.7
3: Agree (%)	33.3	33.3
Total (N)	42	12

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.1	58.3
3: Agree (%)	52.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.8	16.7
3: Agree (%)	54.8	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.5	58.3
3: Agree (%)	41.5	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.6	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	8.3
Total (N)	41	12

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	16.7
3: Some (%)	38.9	25.0
2: A little (%)	19.4	33.3
1: None at all (%)	16.7	25.0
Total (N)	36	12

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	31.0	36.4
3: Some (%)	35.7	18.2
2: A little (%)	21.4	27.3
1: None at all (%)	11.9	18.2
Total (N)	42	11

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	11.9	8.3
3: Some (%)	33.3	25.0
2: A little (%)	26.2	16.7
1: None at all (%)	28.6	50.0
Total (N)	42	12

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	31.7	33.3
3: Some (%)	24.4	33.3
2: A little (%)	22.0	25.0
1: None at all (%)	22.0	8.3
Total (N)	41	12

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	4.8	16.7
3: Some (%)	35.7	41.7
2: A little (%)	40.5	33.3
1: None at all (%)	19.0	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	4.8	.
3: Some (%)	19.0	41.7
2: A little (%)	21.4	33.3
1: None at all (%)	54.8	25.0
Total (N)	42	12

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	7.1	8.3
3: Some (%)	14.3	33.3
2: A little (%)	33.3	25.0
1: None at all (%)	45.2	33.3
Total (N)	42	12

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	14.6	8.3
3: Some (%)	24.4	25.0
2: A little (%)	26.8	41.7
1: None at all (%)	34.1	25.0
Total (N)	41	12

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	9.5	9.1
3: Some (%)	23.8	9.1
2: A little (%)	35.7	36.4
1: None at all (%)	31.0	45.5
Total (N)	42	11

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	47.6	33.3
3: Some (%)	35.7	50.0
2: A little (%)	14.3	16.7
1: None at all (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	42	12

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	40.5	33.3
3: Some (%)	40.5	33.3
2: A little (%)	14.3	25.0
1: None at all (%)	4.8	8.3
Total (N)	42	12

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	17.9	33.3
3: Some (%)	41.0	33.3
2: A little (%)	30.8	33.3
1: None at all (%)	10.3	.
Total (N)	39	12

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	9.8	9.1
3: Some (%)	41.5	36.4
2: A little (%)	36.6	36.4
1: None at all (%)	12.2	18.2
Total (N)	41	11

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	15.0	40.0
3: Some (%)	35.0	20.0
2: A little (%)	30.0	20.0
1: None at all (%)	20.0	20.0
Total (N)	40	10

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.6	41.7
3: Satisfied (%)	62.8	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.3	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.3	8.3
Total (N)	43	12

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
A lot more satisfied now (%)	16.3	8.3
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	30.2	16.7
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	16.3	25.0
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	23.3	25.0
A lot less satisfied now (%)	14.0	25.0
Total (N)	43	12

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	20.9	50.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	20.9	8.3
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	34.9	16.7
Yes - very seriously (%)	23.3	25.0
Total (N)	43	12

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	39.5	58.3
Yes - not very seriously (%)	18.6	25.0
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	30.2	.
Yes - very seriously (%)	11.6	16.7
Total (N)	43	12

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007