North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Humanities and Social Sciences
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	86.9	71.4	63.0	35.5
..... Yes (%)	13.1	28.6	37.0	64.5
Total (N)	84	70	46	31

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.8	24.6	26.7	35.5
3: Agree (%)	66.3	50.8	57.8	38.7
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	23.1	11.1	16.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	1.5	4.4	9.7
Total (N)	80	65	45	31

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	10.4	11.1	26.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.3	48.9	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.3	37.3	24.4	23.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.8	11.9	15.6	10.0
Total (N)	80	67	45	30

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.5	10.9	14.0	23.3
3: Agree (%)	43.6	35.9	37.2	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	39.7	37.5	34.9	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	15.6	14.0	13.3
Total (N)	78	64	43	30

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.6	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	12.7	12.1	18.9	7.7
4: Strong (%)	39.4	22.4	27.0	42.3
3: Average (%)	42.3	56.9	51.4	42.3
2: Weak (%)	5.6	3.4	2.7	7.7
1: Very weak (%)	.	5.2	.	.
Total (N)	71	58	37	26

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	5.0	3.7	9.4	.
4: Strong (%)	38.3	46.3	34.4	41.7
3: Average (%)	33.3	37.0	43.8	45.8
2: Weak (%)	18.3	11.1	12.5	12.5
1: Very weak (%)	5.0	1.9	.	.
Total (N)	60	54	32	24

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.4	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	13.2	8.1	4.9	6.7
4: Strong (%)	23.7	38.7	43.9	30.0
3: Average (%)	48.7	40.3	41.5	56.7
2: Weak (%)	11.8	12.9	9.8	6.7
1: Very weak (%)	2.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	76	62	41	30

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.7	3.2	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	8.3	19.4	5.0	7.1
4: Strong (%)	35.4	44.4	30.0	50.0
3: Average (%)	41.7	27.8	40.0	14.3
2: Weak (%)	10.4	5.6	25.0	28.6
1: Very weak (%)	4.2	2.8	.	.
Total (N)	48	36	20	14

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3	3.2	2.9
5: Very strong (%)	7.1	6.3	5.3	.
4: Strong (%)	28.6	40.6	31.6	30.0
3: Average (%)	45.2	34.4	42.1	30.0
2: Weak (%)	16.7	12.5	15.8	40.0
1: Very weak (%)	2.4	6.3	5.3	.
Total (N)	42	32	19	10

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.1	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	8.6	12.8	3.0	4.8
4: Strong (%)	34.5	36.2	18.2	38.1
3: Average (%)	43.1	38.3	63.6	52.4
2: Weak (%)	8.6	12.8	15.2	4.8
1: Very weak (%)	5.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	58	47	33	21

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.5	2.9
5: Very strong (%)	2.9	.	.	.
4: Strong (%)	22.9	16.0	22.2	27.3
3: Average (%)	48.6	52.0	27.8	54.5
2: Weak (%)	20.0	28.0	27.8	.
1: Very weak (%)	5.7	4.0	22.2	18.2
Total (N)	35	25	18	11

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.1	4.0	3.8	3.8
A (%)	24.1	15.6	6.7	6.7
B (%)	62.0	70.3	68.9	70.0
C (%)	12.7	14.1	24.4	20.0
D (%)	1.3	.	.	3.3
Total (N)	79	64	45	30

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.3	4.1	4.0
A (%)	35.5	39.7	25.0	14.8
B (%)	48.4	55.2	65.0	66.7
C (%)	14.5	5.2	7.5	18.5
D (%)	1.6	.	.	.
F (%)	.	.	2.5	.
Total (N)	62	58	40	27

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5	4.3	4.3
A (%)	47.6	56.7	42.2	38.7
B (%)	42.9	35.8	44.4	54.8
C (%)	9.5	6.0	11.1	6.5
D (%)	.	1.5	2.2	.
Total (N)	84	67	45	31

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	4.2	4.3	4.3
A (%)	32.1	42.4	47.8	40.0
B (%)	54.8	40.9	37.0	46.7
C (%)	11.9	15.2	13.0	13.3
D (%)	1.2	1.5	2.2	.
Total (N)	84	66	46	30

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6	4.5	4.4
A (%)	65.5	57.4	54.3	53.3
B (%)	28.6	41.2	39.1	36.7
C (%)	4.8	1.5	6.5	10.0
D (%)	1.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	84	68	46	30

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4	4.3	4.3
A (%)	51.2	47.1	50.0	40.0
B (%)	38.1	45.6	37.0	50.0
C (%)	9.5	5.9	10.9	10.0
D (%)	1.2	1.5	2.2	.
Total (N)	84	68	46	30

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	26.5	18.8	19.6	33.3
Vision with slow progress (%)	31.3	42.0	28.3	33.3
No clear vision (%)	33.7	29.0	41.3	33.3
Not familiar (%)	8.4	10.1	10.9	.
Total (N)	83	69	46	30

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	36.6	31.8	20.0
3: Agree (%)	60.4	58.5	54.5	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	4.9	13.6	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	.	.	5.0
Total (N)	48	41	22	20

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	16.7	8.7	15.2	6.9
Vision with slow progress (%)	45.2	39.1	21.7	34.5
No clear vision (%)	14.3	23.2	34.8	24.1
Not familiar (%)	23.8	29.0	28.3	34.5
Total (N)	84	69	46	29

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	56.0	49.3	31.1	48.3
Change for the worse (%)	8.3	11.6	31.1	13.8
Not really change (%)	35.7	39.1	37.8	37.9
Total (N)	84	69	45	29

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	54.8	44.1	27.3	24.1
Change for the worse (%)	4.8	8.8	22.7	24.1
Not really change (%)	40.5	47.1	50.0	51.7
Total (N)	84	68	44	29

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	57.1	30.4	24.4	17.9
Change for the worse (%)	3.6	13.0	31.1	28.6
Not really change (%)	39.3	56.5	44.4	53.6
Total (N)	84	69	45	28

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	37.8	27.5	33.3	57.1
3: Good (%)	35.4	40.6	31.1	25.0
2: Fair (%)	9.8	20.3	28.9	10.7
1: Poor (%)	17.1	11.6	6.7	7.1
Total (N)	82	69	45	28

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	45.6	25.4	37.2	53.6
3: Good (%)	21.5	38.8	30.2	25.0
2: Fair (%)	13.9	17.9	25.6	10.7
1: Poor (%)	19.0	17.9	7.0	10.7
Total (N)	79	67	43	28

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	35.5	27.7	31.0	50.0
3: Good (%)	28.9	33.8	40.5	26.9
2: Fair (%)	19.7	23.1	21.4	7.7
1: Poor (%)	15.8	15.4	7.1	15.4
Total (N)	76	65	42	26

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	30.3	27.4	28.6	40.7
3: Good (%)	40.8	33.9	52.4	37.0
2: Fair (%)	23.7	29.0	14.3	14.8
1: Poor (%)	5.3	9.7	4.8	7.4
Total (N)	76	62	42	27

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	38.7	42.9	56.5
3: Good (%)	30.0	30.6	33.3	34.8
2: Fair (%)	13.8	22.6	16.7	4.3
1: Poor (%)	6.3	8.1	7.1	4.3
Total (N)	80	62	42	23

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	23.8	25.4	23.8	40.0
3: Good (%)	30.0	28.4	23.8	28.0
2: Fair (%)	36.3	32.8	45.2	24.0
1: Poor (%)	10.0	13.4	7.1	8.0
Total (N)	80	67	42	25

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	41.5	30.4	34.9	44.0
3: Good (%)	20.7	23.2	20.9	24.0
2: Fair (%)	17.1	20.3	20.9	12.0
1: Poor (%)	20.7	26.1	23.3	20.0
Total (N)	82	69	43	25

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.4	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	28.8	18.3	25.6	30.4
3: Good (%)	32.9	28.3	17.9	34.8
2: Fair (%)	21.9	20.0	25.6	26.1
1: Poor (%)	16.4	33.3	30.8	8.7
Total (N)	73	60	39	23

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.0	17.9	13.0	22.2
3: Good (%)	41.3	32.8	26.1	40.7
2: Fair (%)	28.8	28.4	37.0	11.1
1: Poor (%)	15.0	20.9	23.9	25.9
Total (N)	80	67	46	27

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.8	25.4	33.3	29.2
3: Good (%)	29.9	25.4	28.9	41.7
2: Fair (%)	36.4	31.3	22.2	12.5
1: Poor (%)	13.0	17.9	15.6	16.7
Total (N)	77	67	45	24

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	45.2	24.1	43.9	52.6
3: Good (%)	28.8	39.7	36.6	21.1
2: Fair (%)	19.2	22.4	17.1	15.8
1: Poor (%)	6.8	13.8	2.4	10.5
Total (N)	73	58	41	19

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.4	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	54.5	51.6	50.0	63.6
3: Good (%)	35.1	32.3	35.0	31.8
2: Fair (%)	7.8	16.1	15.0	4.5
1: Poor (%)	2.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	77	62	40	22

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.8	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	34.6	35.9	27.9	40.9
3: Good (%)	38.5	26.6	34.9	40.9
2: Fair (%)	19.2	23.4	30.2	9.1
1: Poor (%)	7.7	14.1	7.0	9.1
Total (N)	78	64	43	22

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	31.2	30.2	29.5	36.4
3: Good (%)	28.6	27.0	29.5	40.9
2: Fair (%)	18.2	22.2	29.5	4.5
1: Poor (%)	22.1	20.6	11.4	18.2
Total (N)	77	63	44	22

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	32.0	31.7	33.3	50.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	40.0	33.3	30.0
2: Fair (%)	18.7	18.3	19.0	15.0
1: Poor (%)	9.3	10.0	14.3	5.0
Total (N)	75	60	42	20

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.3	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.7	16.7	5.7	23.5
3: Good (%)	47.1	33.3	37.1	35.3
2: Fair (%)	28.6	39.6	40.0	23.5
1: Poor (%)	8.6	10.4	17.1	17.6
Total (N)	70	48	35	17

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.1	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	12.7	12.5	6.7	18.8
3: Good (%)	46.0	42.5	23.3	37.5
2: Fair (%)	28.6	30.0	43.3	18.8
1: Poor (%)	12.7	15.0	26.7	25.0
Total (N)	63	40	30	16

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4	2.0	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	4.0	9.4	3.4	15.4
3: Good (%)	44.0	37.5	27.6	38.5
2: Fair (%)	30.0	37.5	37.9	15.4
1: Poor (%)	22.0	15.6	31.0	30.8
Total (N)	50	32	29	13

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	18.5	20.5	6.7	18.8
3: Good (%)	44.4	51.3	56.7	50.0
2: Fair (%)	20.4	23.1	26.7	12.5
1: Poor (%)	16.7	5.1	10.0	18.8
Total (N)	54	39	30	16

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.0	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	18.3	14.7	3.1	18.2
3: Good (%)	31.7	44.1	25.0	36.4
2: Fair (%)	35.0	32.4	43.8	18.2
1: Poor (%)	15.0	8.8	28.1	27.3
Total (N)	60	34	32	11

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	11.5	11.4	7.1	21.4
3: Good (%)	37.7	31.8	32.1	28.6
2: Fair (%)	23.0	25.0	21.4	21.4
1: Poor (%)	27.9	31.8	39.3	28.6
Total (N)	61	44	28	14

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.3	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	13.9	19.4	5.3	10.0
3: Good (%)	36.1	32.3	36.8	30.0
2: Fair (%)	33.3	29.0	36.8	30.0
1: Poor (%)	16.7	19.4	21.1	30.0
Total (N)	36	31	19	10

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	1.8	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	7.0	7.1	2.7	5.0
3: Good (%)	23.9	30.4	18.9	30.0
2: Fair (%)	42.3	39.3	35.1	15.0
1: Poor (%)	26.8	23.2	43.2	50.0
Total (N)	71	56	37	20

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1	2.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	8.8	7.1	8.0	13.3
3: Good (%)	31.6	23.8	32.0	53.3
2: Fair (%)	31.6	40.5	52.0	6.7
1: Poor (%)	28.1	28.6	8.0	26.7
Total (N)	57	42	25	15

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	18.0	20.0	12.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	34.0	42.9	40.0	25.0
2: Fair (%)	38.0	22.9	28.0	8.3
1: Poor (%)	10.0	14.3	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	50	35	25	12

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.0	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	34.9	35.0	24.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	52.4	45.0	51.7	46.7
2: Fair (%)	9.5	20.0	24.1	13.3
1: Poor (%)	3.2	.	.	6.7
Total (N)	63	40	29	15

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	21.3	18.4	7.7	15.4
3: Good (%)	39.3	44.7	50.0	46.2
2: Fair (%)	34.4	23.7	38.5	15.4
1: Poor (%)	4.9	13.2	3.8	23.1
Total (N)	61	38	26	13

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	21.8	13.2	11.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	29.1	31.6	34.6	41.7
2: Fair (%)	30.9	34.2	50.0	16.7
1: Poor (%)	18.2	21.1	3.8	25.0
Total (N)	55	38	26	12

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	28.9	14.3	21.4
3: Good (%)	58.2	47.4	50.0	50.0
2: Fair (%)	14.5	18.4	28.6	14.3
1: Poor (%)	7.3	5.3	7.1	14.3
Total (N)	55	38	28	14

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0	1.7	1.6
4: Excellent (%)	1.4	5.2	2.4	.
3: Good (%)	30.6	22.4	9.8	20.0
2: Fair (%)	41.7	36.2	43.9	24.0
1: Poor (%)	26.4	36.2	43.9	56.0
Total (N)	72	58	41	25

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8	1.6	1.5
4: Excellent (%)	2.0	2.4	.	.
3: Good (%)	25.5	19.5	9.7	4.3
2: Fair (%)	41.2	36.6	38.7	39.1
1: Poor (%)	31.4	41.5	51.6	56.5
Total (N)	51	41	31	23

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2	2.1	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	1.9	2.6	.
3: Good (%)	44.1	41.5	35.9	32.0
2: Fair (%)	39.7	32.1	33.3	24.0
1: Poor (%)	10.3	24.5	28.2	44.0
Total (N)	68	53	39	25

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.4	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	19.6	10.8	6.7	6.3
3: Good (%)	48.2	51.4	43.3	37.5
2: Fair (%)	26.8	21.6	33.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	5.4	16.2	16.7	31.3
Total (N)	56	37	30	16

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	22.6	18.0	17.1	15.0
3: Good (%)	54.8	56.0	40.0	45.0
2: Fair (%)	19.4	22.0	34.3	20.0
1: Poor (%)	3.2	4.0	8.6	20.0
Total (N)	62	50	35	20

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.1	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	9.5	2.9	.
3: Good (%)	40.0	42.9	35.3	21.1
2: Fair (%)	36.7	33.3	32.4	36.8
1: Poor (%)	13.3	14.3	29.4	42.1
Total (N)	60	42	34	19

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9	1.9	1.5
4: Excellent (%)	8.8	7.1	3.2	.
3: Good (%)	24.6	23.8	16.1	11.8
2: Fair (%)	24.6	21.4	45.2	29.4
1: Poor (%)	42.1	47.6	35.5	58.8
Total (N)	57	42	31	17

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	15.3	13.0	8.8	10.5
3: Good (%)	55.9	48.1	38.2	36.8
2: Fair (%)	16.9	22.2	38.2	31.6
1: Poor (%)	11.9	16.7	14.7	21.1
Total (N)	59	54	34	19

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.9	36.2	47.7	62.1
3: Agree (%)	30.5	31.9	38.6	31.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	18.8	9.1	6.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	13.0	4.5	.
Total (N)	82	69	44	29

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.9	29.4	40.9	46.4
3: Agree (%)	35.4	44.1	36.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.0	17.6	15.9	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.8	8.8	6.8	.
Total (N)	82	68	44	28

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.0	38.2	50.0	58.6
3: Agree (%)	30.9	32.4	36.4	37.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.3	14.7	6.8	3.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.9	14.7	6.8	.
Total (N)	81	68	44	29

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.6	11.6	6.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	40.7	47.8	50.0	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	30.9	21.7	25.0	46.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.8	18.8	18.2	.
Total (N)	81	69	44	28

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.1	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.6	4.4	4.7	3.7
3: Agree (%)	22.8	41.2	32.6	29.6
2: Disagree (%)	46.8	30.9	32.6	48.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.8	23.5	30.2	18.5
Total (N)	79	68	43	27

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	3.1	3.6
4: Very familiar (%)	18.3	33.8	38.6	60.7
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	53.7	45.6	36.4	39.3
2: Not very familiar (%)	19.5	14.7	18.2	.
1: Not at all familiar (%)	8.5	5.9	6.8	.
Total (N)	82	68	44	28

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.1	2.4
4: Very well (%)	2.5	2.9	4.4	13.8
3: Fairly well (%)	22.2	31.9	22.2	34.5
2: Not very well (%)	55.6	46.4	55.6	31.0
1: Not at all (%)	19.8	18.8	17.8	20.7
Total (N)	81	69	45	29

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1	2.2	2.4
4: Very well (%)	1.2	.	6.7	17.2
3: Fairly well (%)	29.6	27.5	22.2	27.6
2: Not very well (%)	50.6	55.1	60.0	37.9
1: Not at all (%)	18.5	17.4	11.1	17.2
Total (N)	81	69	45	29

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.4	2.7
4: Very well (%)	11.1	8.7	8.9	20.7
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	33.3	35.6	37.9
2: Not very well (%)	29.6	49.3	44.4	27.6
1: Not at all (%)	14.8	8.7	11.1	13.8
Total (N)	81	69	45	29

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	3.0	3.1
4: Very well (%)	30.9	24.6	33.3	39.3
3: Fairly well (%)	37.0	46.4	42.2	39.3
2: Not very well (%)	25.9	18.8	15.6	14.3
1: Not at all (%)	6.2	10.1	8.9	7.1
Total (N)	81	69	45	28

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.5	15.9	22.7	23.1
3: Agree (%)	45.0	36.2	50.0	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	30.0	33.3	20.5	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	14.5	6.8	15.4
Total (N)	80	69	44	26

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.5	33.8	37.2	53.6
3: Agree (%)	36.6	42.6	39.5	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	15.9	19.1	18.6	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	4.4	4.7	.
Total (N)	82	68	43	28

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	40.7	26.9	30.2	48.0
3: Good (%)	24.7	40.3	37.2	32.0
2: Fair (%)	22.2	19.4	20.9	16.0
1: Poor (%)	12.3	13.4	11.6	4.0
Total (N)	81	67	43	25

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	10.1	11.4	5.4	22.2
3: Good (%)	49.3	50.0	59.5	44.4
2: Fair (%)	33.3	27.3	32.4	16.7
1: Poor (%)	7.2	11.4	2.7	16.7
Total (N)	69	44	37	18

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.1	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.5	9.5	3.6	.
3: Good (%)	32.3	33.3	28.6	22.2
2: Fair (%)	43.5	38.1	42.9	33.3
1: Poor (%)	17.7	19.0	25.0	44.4
Total (N)	62	42	28	18

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.0	1.5
4: Excellent (%)	1.8	10.5	3.2	.
3: Good (%)	38.2	31.6	19.4	5.9
2: Fair (%)	41.8	44.7	54.8	41.2
1: Poor (%)	18.2	13.2	22.6	52.9
Total (N)	55	38	31	17

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.5	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	9.8	7.1	.
3: Agree (%)	48.6	51.2	46.4	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.1	24.4	32.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.7	14.6	14.3	33.3
Total (N)	35	41	28	18

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	13.2	7.4	5.6
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	40.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	21.1	25.9	38.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	15.8	25.9	22.2
Total (N)	36	38	27	18

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.0	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.8	7.5	7.7	.
3: Agree (%)	26.5	32.5	23.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	32.5	30.8	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	35.3	27.5	38.5	38.9
Total (N)	34	40	26	18

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8	2.5	2.5
4: Very effective (%)	20.0	15.0	7.1	7.7
3: Somewhat effective (%)	33.3	60.0	50.0	61.5
2: Not very effective (%)	20.0	15.0	28.6	7.7
1: Not at all effective (%)	26.7	10.0	14.3	23.1
Total (N)	15	20	14	13

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7	3.5	3.6
4: Very important (%)	56.8	68.7	57.8	63.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	34.6	28.4	31.1	33.3
2: Not very important (%)	6.2	3.0	11.1	3.7
1: Not at all important (%)	2.5	.	.	.
Total (N)	81	67	45	27

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7	3.5	3.3
4: Very important (%)	70.7	69.6	59.1	34.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.2	27.5	29.5	58.6
2: Not very important (%)	6.1	1.4	9.1	6.9
1: Not at all important (%)	.	1.4	2.3	.
Total (N)	82	69	44	29

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6	3.3	3.1
4: Very important (%)	56.1	59.4	52.3	32.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.5	37.7	31.8	46.4
2: Not very important (%)	13.4	2.9	13.6	21.4
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	2.3	.
Total (N)	82	69	44	28

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.8	10.3	8.6	4.5
3: Agree (%)	64.9	60.3	62.9	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	23.0	24.1	25.7	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	5.2	2.9	4.5
Total (N)	74	58	35	22

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	15.6	18.8	14.8
3: Agree (%)	47.3	57.8	34.4	63.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.1	22.2	40.6	18.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	4.4	6.3	3.7
Total (N)	55	45	32	27

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	8.7	25.8	13.6
3: Agree (%)	53.7	67.4	41.9	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	24.1	19.6	25.8	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	4.3	6.5	.
Total (N)	54	46	31	22

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.8	9.1	24.2	8.3
3: Agree (%)	56.1	68.2	45.5	79.2
2: Disagree (%)	24.6	18.2	24.2	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	4.5	6.1	.
Total (N)	57	44	33	24

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.0	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.3	29.3	26.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	63.0	56.9	55.3	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.0	8.6	7.9	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.7	5.2	10.5	3.6
Total (N)	73	58	38	28

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	17.6	27.0	41.7
3: Agree (%)	56.3	51.0	45.9	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.6	25.5	16.2	4.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	5.9	10.8	4.2
Total (N)	64	51	37	24

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.8	22.9	30.6	45.8
3: Agree (%)	55.6	47.9	52.8	45.8
2: Disagree (%)	17.5	25.0	5.6	4.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	4.2	11.1	4.2
Total (N)	63	48	36	24

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.4	45.6	52.4	44.8
3: Agree (%)	45.7	50.0	45.2	41.4
2: Disagree (%)	2.5	2.9	.	6.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	1.5	2.4	6.9
Total (N)	81	68	42	29

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.6	50.9	54.3	50.0
3: Agree (%)	43.5	47.3	42.9	46.2
2: Disagree (%)	1.4	1.8	2.9	3.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.	.	.
Total (N)	69	55	35	26

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.8	34.8	53.5	53.6
3: Agree (%)	41.5	56.5	32.6	35.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.3	2.9	9.3	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	5.8	4.7	3.6
Total (N)	82	69	43	28

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	45.5	64.3	58.3
3: Agree (%)	47.6	42.4	35.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	9.1	.	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.0	.	.
Total (N)	42	33	14	12

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.9	41.3	54.1	64.0
3: Agree (%)	43.0	55.6	43.2	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	1.6	2.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	1.6	.	.
Total (N)	79	63	37	25

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	42.4	52.5	53.6
3: Agree (%)	40.0	51.5	40.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.0	3.0	2.5	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	3.0	5.0	.
Total (N)	80	66	40	28

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.6	45.0	66.7	60.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.0	30.3	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.4	.	3.0	.
Total (N)	70	60	33	20

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.2	44.8	59.5	59.1
3: Agree (%)	38.7	48.3	32.4	27.3
2: Disagree (%)	4.8	3.4	2.7	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	3.4	5.4	9.1
Total (N)	62	58	37	22

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.1	59.6	64.1	67.9
3: Agree (%)	29.2	35.1	35.9	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.4	1.8	.	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	3.5	.	.
Total (N)	72	57	39	28

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.7	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.2	62.3	70.6	70.4
3: Agree (%)	27.7	32.1	29.4	29.6
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	1.9	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.8	.	.
Total (N)	65	53	34	27

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.4	56.9	64.1	67.9
3: Agree (%)	20.0	37.9	35.9	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	1.7	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	3.4	.	3.6
Total (N)	70	58	39	28

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.8	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	78.3	57.9	81.0	65.0
3: Agree (%)	19.6	34.2	19.0	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	2.6	.	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	46	38	21	20

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.1	56.1	64.9	73.1
3: Agree (%)	18.3	35.1	35.1	23.1
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	3.5	.	3.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	71	57	37	26

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	67.1	56.1	64.9	71.4
3: Agree (%)	27.4	35.1	35.1	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.1	3.5	.	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	73	57	37	28

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	56.4	69.4	69.2
3: Agree (%)	31.9	36.4	27.8	30.8
2: Disagree (%)	1.4	3.6	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6	2.8	.
Total (N)	69	55	36	26

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.5	58.5	69.4	76.0
3: Agree (%)	24.6	35.8	25.0	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	.	5.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	5.7	.	4.0
Total (N)	61	53	36	25

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	2.9	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	35.1	42.4	27.3	17.9
3: Some (%)	46.8	39.4	45.5	64.3
2: A little (%)	18.2	13.6	20.5	10.7
1: Not at all (%)	.	4.5	6.8	7.1
Total (N)	77	66	44	28

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.1	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	47.5	34.3	38.6	44.8
3: Some (%)	41.3	50.7	40.9	31.0
2: A little (%)	10.0	13.4	11.4	20.7
1: Not at all (%)	1.3	1.5	9.1	3.4
Total (N)	80	67	44	29

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0	3.0	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	57.3	47.8	45.5	44.8
3: Some (%)	26.8	26.9	20.5	20.7
2: A little (%)	9.8	7.5	20.5	17.2
1: None (%)	6.1	17.9	13.6	17.2
Total (N)	82	67	44	29

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.8	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	36.6	37.9	20.5	24.1
3: Some (%)	30.5	21.2	45.5	24.1
2: A little (%)	20.7	18.2	22.7	31.0
1: None (%)	12.2	22.7	11.4	20.7
Total (N)	82	66	44	29

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0	1.8	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	12.5	11.8	11.4	7.1
3: Some (%)	27.5	19.1	11.4	17.9
2: A little (%)	21.3	22.1	18.2	14.3
1: None (%)	38.8	47.1	59.1	60.7
Total (N)	80	68	44	28

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.3	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	20.6	15.9	10.3
3: Some (%)	27.5	26.5	25.0	34.5
2: A little (%)	25.0	19.1	36.4	13.8
1: None (%)	22.5	33.8	22.7	41.4
Total (N)	80	68	44	29

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5	2.2	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	24.7	31.3	20.5	20.7
3: Some (%)	18.5	20.9	20.5	20.7
2: A little (%)	24.7	11.9	15.9	20.7
1: None (%)	32.1	35.8	43.2	37.9
Total (N)	81	67	44	29

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.3	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	19.5	23.9	18.6	17.9
3: Some (%)	30.5	14.9	23.3	17.9
2: A little (%)	25.6	23.9	27.9	28.6
1: None (%)	24.4	37.3	30.2	35.7
Total (N)	82	67	43	28

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.5	20.3	18.2	21.4
3: Agree (%)	40.2	29.0	40.9	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	29.3	31.9	29.5	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.0	18.8	11.4	14.3
Total (N)	82	69	44	28

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.7	66.7	58.1	56.7
3: Agree (%)	28.0	33.3	41.9	43.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	82	69	43	30

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.1	18.5	16.7	13.3
3: Agree (%)	72.2	72.3	76.2	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	9.2	7.1	16.7
Total (N)	79	65	42	30

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.5	14.9	16.3	23.3
3: Agree (%)	41.5	38.8	53.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.5	38.8	23.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	7.5	7.0	3.3
Total (N)	82	67	43	30

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.6	7.0	.	8.0
3: Agree (%)	55.4	53.5	64.3	44.0
2: Disagree (%)	35.7	32.6	28.6	44.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.4	7.0	7.1	4.0
Total (N)	56	43	28	25

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.2	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.5	.	.	6.3
3: Agree (%)	42.5	41.7	33.3	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	32.5	36.1	50.0	18.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.5	22.2	16.7	37.5
Total (N)	40	36	18	16

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.1	29.0	31.8	37.9
3: Agree (%)	54.3	42.0	47.7	41.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	18.8	11.4	13.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	10.1	9.1	6.9
Total (N)	81	69	44	29

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.3	3.1
Frequently (%)	46.3	44.9	40.9	36.7
Sometimes (%)	43.9	43.5	47.7	43.3
Seldom (%)	7.3	8.7	9.1	13.3
Never (%)	2.4	2.9	2.3	6.7
Total (N)	82	69	44	30

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	3.1	3.0
Frequently (%)	31.7	27.5	40.9	30.0
Sometimes (%)	39.0	39.1	38.6	43.3
Seldom (%)	14.6	15.9	6.8	20.0
Never (%)	14.6	17.4	13.6	6.7
Total (N)	82	69	44	30

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.3	3.3
Frequently (%)	50.0	35.3	45.5	43.3
Sometimes (%)	39.0	45.6	45.5	43.3
Seldom (%)	11.0	11.8	4.5	10.0
Never (%)	.	7.4	4.5	3.3
Total (N)	82	68	44	30

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	40.2	30.4	47.7	33.3
Sometimes (%)	35.4	42.0	36.4	43.3
Seldom (%)	15.9	14.5	4.5	23.3
Never (%)	8.5	13.0	11.4	.
Total (N)	82	69	44	30

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.0	2.3
Frequently (%)	11.0	13.0	11.4	16.7
Sometimes (%)	24.4	26.1	22.7	30.0
Seldom (%)	29.3	26.1	25.0	20.0
Never (%)	35.4	34.8	40.9	33.3
Total (N)	82	69	44	30

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9	2.7	2.7
Frequently (%)	15.9	31.9	22.7	20.0
Sometimes (%)	46.3	37.7	45.5	46.7
Seldom (%)	15.9	15.9	11.4	16.7
Never (%)	22.0	14.5	20.5	16.7
Total (N)	82	69	44	30

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.1	2.1	2.1
Frequently (%)	6.2	14.7	11.4	3.3
Sometimes (%)	29.6	26.5	27.3	36.7
Seldom (%)	12.3	14.7	18.2	30.0
Never (%)	51.9	44.1	43.2	30.0
Total (N)	81	68	44	30

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.6	2.7
Frequently (%)	24.4	20.3	25.0	26.7
Sometimes (%)	32.9	26.1	38.6	40.0
Seldom (%)	12.2	18.8	4.5	10.0
Never (%)	30.5	34.8	31.8	23.3
Total (N)	82	69	44	30

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	1.9	2.1
Frequently (%)	12.2	8.7	6.8	16.7
Sometimes (%)	22.0	24.6	29.5	23.3
Seldom (%)	14.6	24.6	9.1	16.7
Never (%)	51.2	42.0	54.5	43.3
Total (N)	82	69	44	30

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	44.4	42.6	44.2	56.7
3: Satisfied (%)	43.2	42.6	51.2	36.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.3	13.2	4.7	3.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	1.5	.	3.3
Total (N)	81	68	43	30

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	45.7	25.0	30.2	43.3
3: Satisfied (%)	39.5	44.1	53.5	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.3	26.5	11.6	13.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	4.4	4.7	3.3
Total (N)	81	68	43	30

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.7	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.6	48.5	69.8	70.0
3: Satisfied (%)	34.6	30.9	25.6	26.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.3	17.6	4.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	2.9	.	3.3
Total (N)	81	68	43	30

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6	3.8	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	72.5	64.7	76.7	73.3
3: Satisfied (%)	21.3	27.9	23.3	23.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.8	5.9	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	1.5	.	3.3
Total (N)	80	68	43	30

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.0	32.4	25.6	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	38.2	51.2	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	20.6	16.3	23.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	8.8	7.0	6.7
Total (N)	80	68	43	30

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.2	19.1	14.3	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	68.4	63.2	52.4	53.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.7	17.6	31.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	.	2.4	10.0
Total (N)	79	68	42	30

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.3	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.5	31.3	33.3	19.2
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	54.2	63.3	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	14.6	3.3	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	3.8
Total (N)	48	48	30	26

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.5	15.2	12.5	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	28.2	30.4	33.3	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.1	37.0	25.0	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.2	17.4	29.2	10.0
Total (N)	39	46	24	20

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	2.0	1.8	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.6	9.4	8.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	18.8	8.7	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.7	37.5	34.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	45.7	34.4	47.8	23.8
Total (N)	35	32	23	21

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	24.6	14.6	24.1
3: Agree (%)	56.0	58.5	70.7	48.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.7	16.9	9.8	20.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	.	4.9	6.9
Total (N)	75	65	41	29

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.2	26.7	20.0	14.3
3: Agree (%)	64.4	46.7	51.4	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.7	26.7	22.9	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.7	.	5.7	7.1
Total (N)	73	60	35	28

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.4	6.9	26.7	6.7
3: Agree (%)	58.3	51.7	40.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	37.9	26.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	3.4	6.7	20.0
Total (N)	36	29	15	15

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	19.5	15.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	54.2	58.5	65.4	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	17.1	11.5	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	4.9	7.7	18.8
Total (N)	48	41	26	16

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	6.3	5.4	7.1
3: Agree (%)	52.9	46.0	62.2	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.1	34.9	27.0	32.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.7	12.7	5.4	21.4
Total (N)	70	63	37	28

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	30.9	18.9	25.0
3: Agree (%)	51.5	40.0	59.5	46.4
2: Disagree (%)	14.7	20.0	16.2	17.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.4	9.1	5.4	10.7
Total (N)	68	55	37	28

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.6	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.1	14.8	14.3	.
3: Agree (%)	48.6	25.9	50.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	22.9	48.1	21.4	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	11.1	14.3	26.7
Total (N)	35	27	14	15

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	8.8	10.5	6.7
3: Agree (%)	45.5	47.1	47.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	32.4	31.6	26.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	11.8	10.5	6.7
Total (N)	44	34	19	15

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.5	20.6	20.9	18.5
3: Satisfied (%)	46.2	50.0	41.9	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	26.5	27.9	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.0	2.9	9.3	3.7
Total (N)	78	68	43	27

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.7	10.3	8.3	10.3
3: Satisfied (%)	37.5	32.8	33.3	34.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.3	34.5	27.8	34.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	22.4	30.6	20.7
Total (N)	56	58	36	29

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.3	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.1	28.1	30.0	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	79.4	65.6	65.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	1.5	4.7	5.0	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	1.6	.	.
Total (N)	68	64	40	27

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0	1.8	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.7	6.6	3.1	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	35.6	24.6	21.9	4.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.6	32.8	31.3	54.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.1	36.1	43.8	33.3
Total (N)	59	61	32	24

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.6	23.1	30.0	11.5
3: Satisfied (%)	62.0	64.6	52.5	65.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.0	7.7	10.0	19.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	4.6	7.5	3.8
Total (N)	71	65	40	26

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.9	26.6	22.0	17.9
3: Satisfied (%)	68.9	65.6	56.1	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.5	4.7	14.6	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.7	3.1	7.3	.
Total (N)	74	64	41	28

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8	2.0	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	3.4	2.8	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	31.8	18.6	27.8	34.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.3	37.3	33.3	37.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	34.8	40.7	36.1	24.1
Total (N)	66	59	36	29

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	5.8	2.9	3.3
3: Satisfied (%)	43.4	36.5	38.2	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.2	32.7	29.4	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.6	25.0	29.4	23.3
Total (N)	53	52	34	30

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	1.9	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	6.0	2.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	25.5	24.0	23.5	34.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.1	34.0	29.4	37.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.6	36.0	44.1	27.6
Total (N)	51	50	34	29

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.5	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.3	5.6	8.3	.
3: Satisfied (%)	73.2	61.1	54.2	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.8	25.0	20.8	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.8	8.3	16.7	6.7
Total (N)	41	36	24	15

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.6	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.0	4.4	12.5	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	58.7	48.9	50.0	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.6	40.0	20.8	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.7	6.7	16.7	19.0
Total (N)	46	45	24	21

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.4	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.8	46.9	40.5	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	40.3	48.4	59.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.4	4.7	.	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.6	.	.	.
Total (N)	77	64	42	30

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.1	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.0	21.0	25.6	12.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.4	74.2	64.1	72.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	4.8	7.7	16.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	.	2.6	.
Total (N)	71	62	39	25

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	11.4	13.6	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	74.3	68.2	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.1	14.3	4.5	30.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	.	13.6	7.7
Total (N)	36	35	22	13

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	32.9	26.5	9.3	.
No (%)	67.1	72.1	83.7	100.0
Don't know (%)	.	1.5	7.0	.
Total (N)	79	68	43	30

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	4.0
4: Very helpful (%)	61.5	55.6	100.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	19.2	27.8	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	11.5	5.6	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	7.7	11.1	.
Total (N)	26	18	4

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	10.3	9.1	5.9
3: Satisfied (%)	34.3	31.0	31.8	11.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.3	37.9	36.4	64.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.4	20.7	22.7	17.6
Total (N)	35	29	22	17

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	10.7	11.1	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	28.6	55.6	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.8	32.1	22.2	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	28.6	11.1	16.7
Total (N)	24	28	18	18

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.4	8.3	6.3	5.9
3: Satisfied (%)	30.4	41.7	25.0	17.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.8	33.3	50.0	52.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	16.7	18.8	23.5
Total (N)	23	24	16	17

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	9.5	8.3	5.9
3: Satisfied (%)	44.4	38.1	25.0	11.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	28.6	58.3	64.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	23.8	8.3	17.6
Total (N)	18	21	12	17

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	1.9	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	9.5	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	38.1	14.3	29.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	23.8	57.1	35.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	28.6	28.6	35.3
Total (N)	16	21	14	17

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.0	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	10.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	40.0	14.3	26.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	25.0	71.4	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	25.0	14.3	33.3
Total (N)	16	20	14	15

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2	1.7	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	10.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	35.3	30.0	15.4	26.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.3	25.0	38.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	35.0	46.2	33.3
Total (N)	17	20	13	15

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.5	28.6	40.5	44.8
3: Agree (%)	48.7	50.8	45.2	34.5
2: Disagree (%)	9.2	15.9	11.9	17.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.6	4.8	2.4	3.4
Total (N)	76	63	42	29

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.8	27.7	46.3	48.3
3: Agree (%)	51.3	53.8	43.9	41.4
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	13.8	9.8	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	4.6	.	.
Total (N)	78	65	41	29

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1	3.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.3	18.9	51.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	47.3	67.6	44.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	13.5	3.4	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.	.	4.2
Total (N)	55	37	29	24

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	27.0	55.6	36.4
3: Agree (%)	46.0	67.6	40.7	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	2.0	5.4	3.7	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	50	37	27	22

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.9	33.3	40.0	23.8
3: Agree (%)	36.7	54.5	32.0	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	8.2	6.1	16.0	19.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	6.1	12.0	9.5
Total (N)	49	33	25	21

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.2	14.0	32.4	7.7
3: Agree (%)	38.4	52.6	35.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.5	24.6	18.9	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	8.8	13.5	11.5
Total (N)	73	57	37	26

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	29.8	36.8	22.2
3: Agree (%)	46.6	43.9	47.4	48.1
2: Disagree (%)	11.0	19.3	5.3	14.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.5	7.0	10.5	14.8
Total (N)	73	57	38	27

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.2	15.8	24.3	18.5
3: Agree (%)	25.0	35.1	29.7	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	34.7	40.4	32.4	25.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	8.8	13.5	11.1
Total (N)	72	57	37	27

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	18.9	40.0	11.5
3: Agree (%)	31.9	41.5	31.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	20.8	11.4	19.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.1	18.9	17.1	19.2
Total (N)	72	53	35	26

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.9	2.6
4: Very well (%)	24.1	19.4	29.3	14.3
3: Fairly well (%)	32.9	32.3	41.5	46.4
2: Not very well (%)	16.5	21.0	14.6	25.0
1: Not at all (%)	26.6	27.4	14.6	14.3
Total (N)	79	62	41	28

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	63.8	45.5	33.3	31.0
Yes (%)	36.3	54.5	66.7	69.0
Total (N)	80	66	42	29

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	80.0	57.6	28.6	17.2
Yes (%)	20.0	42.4	71.4	82.8
Total (N)	80	66	42	29

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	92.5	71.2	38.1	27.6
Yes (%)	7.5	28.8	61.9	72.4
Total (N)	80	66	42	29

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	48.8	62.1	83.3	96.6
Yes (%)	51.3	37.9	16.7	3.4
Total (N)	80	66	42	29

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.3	3.4
4: Very well (%)	31.6	35.4	48.8	50.0
3: Fairly well (%)	35.4	33.8	39.0	35.7
2: Not very well (%)	19.0	16.9	9.8	14.3
1: Not at all (%)	13.9	13.8	2.4	.
Total (N)	79	65	41	28

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9	3.4	3.5
4: Very well (%)	28.2	38.5	53.7	58.6
3: Fairly well (%)	37.2	27.7	31.7	34.5
2: Not very well (%)	20.5	20.0	12.2	6.9
1: Not at all (%)	14.1	13.8	2.4	.
Total (N)	78	65	41	29

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.4	23.1	20.0	21.4
3: Agree (%)	33.3	44.2	51.4	53.6
2: Disagree (%)	20.8	25.0	20.0	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.4	7.7	8.6	3.6
Total (N)	48	52	35	28

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	27.1	44.1	32.1
3: Agree (%)	31.4	52.1	41.2	60.7
2: Disagree (%)	21.6	14.6	8.8	3.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	6.3	5.9	3.6
Total (N)	51	48	34	28

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.6	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.3	6.6	2.6	3.6
3: Agree (%)	63.9	55.7	57.9	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	24.6	36.8	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	13.1	2.6	14.3
Total (N)	72	61	38	28

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.0	9.3	.	3.8
3: Agree (%)	56.1	44.4	58.3	34.6
2: Disagree (%)	24.6	37.0	36.1	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	9.3	5.6	11.5
Total (N)	57	54	36	26

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3	2.3	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.7	8.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	29.2	50.0	7.7
2: Disagree (%)	25.7	45.8	33.3	53.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.4	16.7	16.7	38.5
Total (N)	35	24	12	13

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.3	26.9	8.3	9.1
3: Agree (%)	62.8	42.3	41.7	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	18.6	26.9	50.0	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	3.8	.	.
Total (N)	43	26	12	11

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.5	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.8	12.1	6.3	.
3: Agree (%)	64.3	48.5	43.8	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	27.3	43.8	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	12.1	6.3	27.3
Total (N)	42	33	16	11

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.1	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.2	7.1	.	5.0
3: Agree (%)	51.0	42.9	28.6	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.7	33.3	50.0	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	16.7	21.4	15.0
Total (N)	49	42	28	20

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	22.6	11.1	13.8
3: Agree (%)	50.0	45.2	55.6	37.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.1	16.1	27.8	31.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	16.1	5.6	17.2
Total (N)	72	62	36	29

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.9	31.9	25.8	48.0
3: Agree (%)	45.2	51.1	45.2	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.5	6.4	25.8	12.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	10.6	3.2	4.0
Total (N)	62	47	31	25

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	21.4	12.5	21.4
3: Agree (%)	33.3	42.9	43.8	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	14.3	25.0	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	21.4	18.8	28.6
Total (N)	42	28	16	14

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	26.1	16.7	.
3: Agree (%)	52.5	26.1	33.3	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	22.5	21.7	50.0	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.0	26.1	.	30.0
Total (N)	40	23	12	10

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.4	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.1	10.8	8.0	.
3: Agree (%)	52.4	37.8	36.0	47.1
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	27.0	40.0	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.7	24.3	16.0	29.4
Total (N)	42	37	25	17

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	10.6	6.9	9.1
3: Agree (%)	56.6	44.7	48.3	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	22.6	23.4	41.4	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.3	21.3	3.4	18.2
Total (N)	53	47	29	22

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	15.7	46.3	91.4	93.1
No experience (%)	84.3	53.7	8.6	6.9
Total (N)	51	41	35	29

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	94.1	65.9	14.3	6.9
Yes (%)	5.9	34.1	85.7	93.1
Total (N)	51	41	35	29

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	90.2	78.0	34.3	55.2
Yes (%)	9.8	22.0	65.7	44.8
Total (N)	51	41	35	29

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	96.1	90.2	91.4	93.1
Yes (%)	3.9	9.8	8.6	6.9
Total (N)	51	41	35	29

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	97.6	97.1	96.6
Yes (%)	.	2.4	2.9	3.4
Total (N)	51	41	35	29

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	17.9	16.0	.
3: Agree (%)	67.9	67.9	72.0	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	14.3	12.0	31.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	9.1
Total (N)	28	28	25	22

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	9.7	9.7	4.0
3: Agree (%)	63.3	38.7	58.1	56.0
2: Disagree (%)	23.3	45.2	25.8	28.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	6.5	6.5	12.0
Total (N)	30	31	31	25

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	12.1	18.2	16.0
3: Agree (%)	71.4	57.6	66.7	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	27.3	15.2	12.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	3.0	.	12.0
Total (N)	28	33	33	25

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	12.5	15.2	16.0
3: Agree (%)	57.1	59.4	66.7	44.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.7	21.9	15.2	32.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	6.3	3.0	8.0
Total (N)	28	32	33	25

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	12.5	23.3	17.4
3: Agree (%)	78.9	58.3	63.3	56.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	16.7	10.0	13.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	3.3	13.0
Total (N)	19	24	30	23

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.5	12.5	16.7	21.7
3: Agree (%)	66.7	54.2	70.0	43.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	20.8	10.0	17.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	12.5	3.3	17.4
Total (N)	21	24	30	23

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	12.5	17.9	9.1
3: Agree (%)	72.2	54.2	50.0	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	25.0	21.4	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.3	10.7	18.2
Total (N)	18	24	28	22

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.9	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.2	3.8	18.8	3.8
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	61.5	62.5	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	30.8	6.3	23.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.1	3.8	12.5	19.2
Total (N)	11	26	32	26

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	8.6	21.2	11.1
3: Agree (%)	40.6	44.8	45.5	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.2	31.0	18.2	37.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.8	15.5	15.2	18.5
Total (N)	69	58	33	27

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.2	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.0	4.4	11.5	4.8
3: Agree (%)	37.3	28.9	23.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	37.3	44.4	42.3	47.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.5	22.2	23.1	14.3
Total (N)	51	45	26	21

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	1.6	1.6	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	2.1	.	4.3
3: Agree (%)	15.5	10.4	6.9	8.7
2: Disagree (%)	43.1	31.3	44.8	21.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	41.4	56.3	48.3	65.2
Total (N)	58	48	29	23

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.9	1.7	1.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.5	2.1	.	4.3
3: Agree (%)	22.8	16.7	10.7	8.7
2: Disagree (%)	35.1	45.8	46.4	43.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	38.6	35.4	42.9	43.5
Total (N)	57	48	28	23

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.7	1.5	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.8	1.8	.	.
3: Agree (%)	15.1	14.5	6.3	8.3
2: Disagree (%)	34.2	36.4	37.5	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	43.8	47.3	56.3	58.3
Total (N)	73	55	32	24

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Very well (%)	17.5	26.2	31.0	41.4
3: Fairly well (%)	41.3	44.6	40.5	31.0
2: Not very well (%)	26.3	16.9	14.3	13.8
1: Not at all (%)	15.0	12.3	14.3	13.8
Total (N)	80	65	42	29

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.4	23.2	26.3	28.6
3: Agree (%)	43.7	44.6	52.6	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	16.9	14.3	13.2	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.1	17.9	7.9	7.1
Total (N)	71	56	38	28

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	3.4	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.3	36.4	41.5	31.0
3: Agree (%)	55.0	53.0	53.7	48.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	9.1	4.9	17.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.5	.	3.4
Total (N)	80	66	41	29

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.0	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.5	9.6	6.1	13.6
3: Agree (%)	36.6	34.6	27.3	13.6
2: Disagree (%)	29.6	28.8	27.3	45.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.4	26.9	39.4	27.3
Total (N)	71	52	33	22

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.9	6.1	7.1	13.6
3: Agree (%)	56.5	59.2	39.3	40.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.7	20.4	17.9	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.9	14.3	35.7	18.2
Total (N)	62	49	28	22

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.0	12.9	6.3	17.6
3: Agree (%)	65.2	58.1	75.0	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.0	22.6	6.3	11.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	6.5	12.5	17.6
Total (N)	46	31	16	17

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0	2.0	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	.	.	3.4
3: Agree (%)	36.3	30.8	31.0	24.1
2: Disagree (%)	33.8	35.4	33.3	48.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.8	33.8	35.7	24.1
Total (N)	80	65	42	29

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.3	17.2	20.0	28.6
3: Agree (%)	48.1	54.7	57.5	39.3
2: Disagree (%)	17.7	20.3	12.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.9	7.8	10.0	7.1
Total (N)	79	64	40	28

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.8	6.5	5.1	17.2
3: Agree (%)	58.8	59.7	61.5	44.8
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	25.8	30.8	27.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.5	8.1	2.6	10.3
Total (N)	80	62	39	29

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8	3.8	3.8
4: Very important (%)	76.3	83.3	87.8	78.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.3	15.2	7.3	17.9
2: Not very important (%)	1.3	1.5	4.9	3.6
1: Not at all important (%)	1.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	80	66	41	28

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8	3.8	3.8
4: Very important (%)	82.5	80.3	82.9	78.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	11.3	15.2	14.6	17.9
2: Not very important (%)	1.3	4.5	2.4	3.6
1: Not at all important (%)	5.0	.	.	.
Total (N)	80	66	41	28

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.8	3.8	3.7
4: Very important (%)	86.1	81.8	82.9	78.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	11.4	16.7	14.6	17.9
2: Not very important (%)	1.3	1.5	2.4	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.3	.	.	3.6
Total (N)	79	66	41	28

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6	3.7	3.7
4: Very important (%)	81.3	65.6	78.0	78.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	15.0	29.7	14.6	17.9
2: Not very important (%)	.	3.1	4.9	.
1: Not at all important (%)	3.8	1.6	2.4	3.6
Total (N)	80	64	41	28

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.7	3.5
4: Very important (%)	63.3	66.7	70.0	60.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	24.1	27.3	27.5	32.1
2: Not very important (%)	7.6	6.1	2.5	3.6
1: Not at all important (%)	5.1	.	.	3.6
Total (N)	79	66	40	28

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.5	3.5
4: Very important (%)	70.0	63.6	60.0	67.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.0	25.8	30.0	21.4
2: Not very important (%)	1.3	9.1	5.0	7.1
1: Not at all important (%)	3.8	1.5	5.0	3.6
Total (N)	80	66	40	28

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.5	20.0	17.1	17.2
3: Agree (%)	48.8	46.2	46.3	44.8
2: Disagree (%)	15.0	21.5	31.7	31.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.8	12.3	4.9	6.9
Total (N)	80	65	41	29

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	23.1	14.6	17.2
3: Agree (%)	55.0	58.5	53.7	51.7
2: Disagree (%)	18.8	13.8	29.3	24.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	4.6	2.4	6.9
Total (N)	80	65	41	29

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.8	21.5	9.8	3.8
3: Agree (%)	54.5	52.3	61.0	65.4
2: Disagree (%)	23.4	18.5	26.8	26.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	7.7	2.4	3.8
Total (N)	77	65	41	26

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	18.5	17.1	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	42.5	32.3	53.7	60.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.5	36.9	24.4	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.0	12.3	4.9	3.6
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6	2.2	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	20.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	27.8	30.0	55.6	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	40.0	11.1	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	10.0	33.3	.
Total (N)	18	10	9	6

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.3	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	7.7	7.3	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	51.3	49.2	39.0	34.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.5	33.8	29.3	41.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.3	9.2	24.4	20.7
Total (N)	80	65	41	29

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	25.0	12.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	37.5	75.0	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	37.5	12.5	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	9	8	8	5

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	3.1	4.9	3.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	54.7	48.8	63.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.5	28.1	31.7	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.3	14.1	14.6	11.1
Total (N)	80	64	41	27

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.5	3.1	2.4	4.0
3: Satisfied (%)	35.4	43.8	29.3	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.5	32.8	43.9	36.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	21.5	20.3	24.4	20.0
Total (N)	79	64	41	25

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	6.2	9.8	.
3: Satisfied (%)	47.5	61.5	46.3	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.5	27.7	31.7	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.0	4.6	12.2	20.8
Total (N)	80	65	41	24

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.5	13.8	14.6	24.1
3: Satisfied (%)	54.4	58.5	61.0	58.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.1	24.6	17.1	13.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.1	3.1	7.3	3.4
Total (N)	79	65	41	29

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.0	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	1.6	.	4.0
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	34.4	25.6	12.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.0	37.7	48.7	36.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.7	26.2	25.6	48.0
Total (N)	75	61	39	25

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.1	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.2	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	39.6	32.6	33.3	11.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	44.2	43.3	47.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	23.3	23.3	41.2
Total (N)	48	43	30	17

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4	2.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.5	6.3	5.0	11.5
3: Satisfied (%)	35.1	49.2	42.5	46.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.3	25.4	25.0	30.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	31.1	19.0	27.5	11.5
Total (N)	74	63	40	26

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0	1.7	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.4	1.6	.	8.0
3: Satisfied (%)	34.2	29.0	17.5	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.4	35.5	35.0	28.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	37.0	33.9	47.5	44.0
Total (N)	73	62	40	25

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.3	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	14.3	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	73.1	64.3	42.9	80.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	7.1	42.9	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.7	14.3	14.3	.
Total (N)	26	14	7	5

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	1.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	9.1	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	72.7	25.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	9.1	25.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.5	9.1	50.0	16.7
Total (N)	8	11	4	6

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	5.4	.	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	74.6	67.9	66.7	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.5	19.6	27.8	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.2	7.1	5.6	5.6
Total (N)	63	56	36	18

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	1.5	2.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	55.4	58.5	59.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.0	33.8	36.6	18.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.1	9.2	2.4	22.2
Total (N)	79	65	41	27

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	6.3	7.3	3.7
3: Satisfied (%)	75.6	82.5	75.6	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.0	11.1	14.6	18.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	2.4	.
Total (N)	78	63	41	27

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.0	1.5	.	3.7
3: Satisfied (%)	55.1	49.2	57.5	40.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	35.4	37.5	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.0	13.8	5.0	11.1
Total (N)	78	65	40	27

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.8	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	40.5	40.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	50.0	50.0	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.2	9.5	10.0	.
Total (N)	52	42	20	15

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.0	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	52.0	45.9	46.7	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.0	51.4	46.7	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.0	2.7	6.7	8.3
Total (N)	50	37	15	12

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.6	3.9	3.2	4.8
3: Satisfied (%)	65.2	66.7	74.2	76.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	21.6	16.1	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	7.8	6.5	4.8
Total (N)	69	51	31	21

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.2	5.0	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	63.3	60.0	66.7	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	25.0	33.3	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.2	10.0	.	.
Total (N)	49	40	15	18

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6	2.8	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.1	57.9	75.0	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	42.1	25.0	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	.	.	10.0
Total (N)	32	19	8	10

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.7	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	64.5	58.8	83.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.1	41.2	16.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.7	.	.	.
Total (N)	31	17	6	9

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9	1.9	1.9
4: A lot (%)	6.3	15.4	7.3	3.4
3: Some (%)	26.3	13.8	19.5	27.6
2: A little (%)	23.8	20.0	29.3	20.7
1: None at all (%)	43.8	50.8	43.9	48.3
Total (N)	80	65	41	29

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2	2.3	1.9
4: Very likely (%)	10.1	13.8	9.8	3.4
3: Somewhat likely (%)	26.6	26.2	34.1	27.6
2: Not very likely (%)	34.2	26.2	34.1	27.6
1: Not at all likely (%)	29.1	33.8	22.0	41.4
Total (N)	79	65	41	29

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	6.7	17.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	67.5	71.7	56.1	63.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.1	18.3	24.4	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.3	3.3	2.4	3.7
Total (N)	77	60	41	27

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.6	7.7	14.6	3.8
3: Satisfied (%)	67.1	55.4	56.1	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.8	32.3	24.4	23.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	4.6	4.9	19.2
Total (N)	79	65	41	26

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.6	11.8	20.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	46.5	67.6	60.0	64.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.6	20.6	20.0	35.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	43	34	25	17

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.2	8.8	18.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	70.7	70.6	68.2	58.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.1	20.6	13.6	35.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	5.9
Total (N)	41	34	22	17

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.6	5.6	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	68.2	66.7	72.7	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	22.2	18.2	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.6	.	.
Total (N)	22	18	11	10

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.3	11.4	21.4	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	63.5	70.5	57.1	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.3	11.4	21.4	21.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	6.8	.	10.5
Total (N)	52	44	28	19

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.8	13.2	12.5	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	78.9	58.3	43.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	5.3	8.3	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	2.6	20.8	18.8
Total (N)	48	38	24	16

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1	2.5	2.1
Once a week or more (%)	12.8	9.2	17.1	3.4
A few times a month (%)	3.8	7.7	7.3	6.9
A few times a semester (%)	12.8	4.6	7.3	17.2
Once a semester (%)	6.4	4.6	4.9	3.4
Once a year (%)	3.8	12.3	4.9	10.3
Never (%)	60.3	61.5	58.5	58.6
Total (N)	78	65	41	29

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9	2.3	1.9
Once a week or more (%)	2.5	1.5	4.9	.
A few times a month (%)	10.1	4.6	7.3	6.9
A few times a semester (%)	17.7	13.8	19.5	13.8
Once a semester (%)	6.3	7.7	9.8	3.4
Once a year (%)	5.1	7.7	.	10.3
Never (%)	58.2	64.6	58.5	65.5
Total (N)	79	65	41	29

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	1.1	1.2	1.3
Once a week or more (%)	1.3	.	.	.
A few times a month (%)	2.6	.	2.4	3.4
A few times a semester (%)	7.7	.	2.4	3.4
Once a semester (%)	1.3	6.2	.	3.4
Once a year (%)	7.7	1.5	4.9	3.4
Never (%)	79.5	92.3	90.2	86.2
Total (N)	78	65	41	29

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7	2.9	2.8
Once a week or more (%)	2.6	1.5	4.9	.
A few times a month (%)	6.4	4.6	2.4	10.3
A few times a semester (%)	32.1	29.2	31.7	27.6
Once a semester (%)	17.9	16.9	19.5	24.1
Once a year (%)	20.5	26.2	24.4	6.9
Never (%)	20.5	21.5	17.1	31.0
Total (N)	78	65	41	29

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.1	2.0	1.9
Once a week or more (%)	2.5	.	2.4	3.4
A few times a month (%)	5.1	4.7	7.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	29.1	15.6	7.3	10.3
Once a semester (%)	10.1	14.1	9.8	13.8
Once a year (%)	8.9	17.2	12.2	10.3
Never (%)	44.3	48.4	61.0	62.1
Total (N)	79	64	41	29

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5	2.7	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	20.0	30.8	41.5	46.4
3: Some (%)	32.5	20.0	17.1	25.0
2: A little (%)	21.3	18.5	9.8	10.7
1: None at all (%)	26.3	30.8	31.7	17.9
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6	1.4	1.3
4: Very likely (%)	8.9	4.6	4.9	.
3: Somewhat likely (%)	17.7	16.9	9.8	10.7
2: Not very likely (%)	17.7	15.4	7.3	7.1
1: Not at all likely (%)	55.7	63.1	78.0	82.1
Total (N)	79	65	41	28

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	50.3	50.3	53.7	56.5
more than 60 hrs (%)	7.7	13.8	15.0	17.9
51 to 60 hrs (%)	32.1	26.2	22.5	35.7
41 to 50 hrs (%)	38.5	29.2	45.0	39.3
40 hrs or less (%)	21.8	30.8	17.5	7.1
Total (N)	78	65	40	28

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	55.7	55.8	41.3	39.7
more than 50% of time (%)	48.8	44.6	19.5	21.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	40.0	40.0	58.5	60.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.5	13.8	17.1	14.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.5	1.5	2.4	3.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	.	2.4	.
0% of time (%)	1.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	11.4	6.2	4.9	14.3
Yes (%)	88.6	93.8	95.1	85.7
Total (N)	79	65	41	28

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	43.0	36.9	51.2	39.3
Yes (%)	57.0	63.1	48.8	60.7
Total (N)	79	65	41	28

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	49.4	43.1	31.7	42.9
Yes (%)	50.6	56.9	68.3	57.1
Total (N)	79	65	41	28

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	86.1	84.6	82.9	89.3
Yes (%)	13.9	15.4	17.1	10.7
Total (N)	79	65	41	28

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	62.0	56.9	43.9	42.9
Yes (%)	38.0	43.1	56.1	57.1
Total (N)	79	65	41	28

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.8	5.7	10.8	7.3
more than 50% of time (%)	.	.	2.4	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	1.3	.	4.9	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	10.0	7.7	17.1	17.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	17.5	20.0	31.7	35.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	46.3	50.8	29.3	17.9
0% of time (%)	25.0	21.5	14.6	28.6
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	45.0	54.9	11.4	25.0
Yes (%)	55.0	45.1	88.6	75.0
Total (N)	60	51	35	20

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	33.3	22.9	30.0
Yes (%)	75.0	66.7	77.1	70.0
Total (N)	60	51	35	20

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	20.0	19.1	25.3	23.4
more than 50% of time (%)	1.3	.	4.9	3.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	36.3	33.8	43.9	39.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	23.8	24.6	22.0	28.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.0	12.3	4.9	10.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	8.8	3.1	4.9	10.7
0% of time (%)	20.0	26.2	19.5	7.1
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.4	1.5	2.3	1.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	.	2.4	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	5.0	3.1	2.4	3.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.3	9.2	4.9	3.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.3	1.5	2.4	7.1
0% of time (%)	87.5	86.2	87.8	85.7
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.7	1.7	0.9	1.4
11% to 25% of time (%)	3.8	1.5	.	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.3	7.7	.	10.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.3	13.8	19.5	10.7
0% of time (%)	78.8	76.9	80.5	78.6
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	70.6	73.3	75.0	50.0
Yes (%)	29.4	26.7	25.0	50.0
Total (N)	17	15	8	6

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	70.6	66.7	75.0	66.7
Yes (%)	29.4	33.3	25.0	33.3
Total (N)	17	15	8	6

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	94.1	93.3	100.0	66.7
Yes (%)	5.9	6.7	.	33.3
Total (N)	17	15	8	6

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	86.7	100.0	83.3
Yes (%)	.	13.3	.	16.7
Total (N)	17	15	8	6

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	88.2	80.0	87.5	33.3
Yes (%)	11.8	20.0	12.5	66.7
Total (N)	17	15	8	6

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.5	8.2	10.8	12.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	2.5	1.5	.	10.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	26.3	21.5	46.3	28.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	18.8	30.8	22.0	28.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	22.5	16.9	17.1	21.4
0% of time (%)	30.0	29.2	14.6	10.7
Total (N)	80	65	41	28

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	78.6	78.3	80.0	72.0
Yes (%)	21.4	21.7	20.0	28.0
Total (N)	56	46	35	25

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	26.8	17.4	8.6	28.0
Yes (%)	73.2	82.6	91.4	72.0
Total (N)	56	46	35	25

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	53.6	39.1	22.9	44.0
Yes (%)	46.4	60.9	77.1	56.0
Total (N)	56	46	35	25

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	75.0	73.9	57.1	72.0
Yes (%)	25.0	26.1	42.9	28.0
Total (N)	56	46	35	25

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	73.2	67.4	42.9	60.0
Yes (%)	26.8	32.6	57.1 </