North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Humanities and Social Sciences
by Race/Ethnicity 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	White	Faculty of Color
..... No (%)	69.4	80.0
..... Yes (%)	30.6	20.0
Total (N)	206	25

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.9	20.8
3: Agree (%)	56.3	54.2
2: Disagree (%)	14.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	.
Total (N)	197	24

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.2	16.0
3: Agree (%)	47.2	32.0
2: Disagree (%)	24.4	32.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.2	20.0
Total (N)	197	25

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.5	13.6
3: Agree (%)	38.9	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	36.8	40.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.9	13.6
Total (N)	193	22

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	12.8	15.0
4: Strong (%)	31.4	40.0
3: Average (%)	49.4	40.0
2: Weak (%)	4.7	5.0
1: Very weak (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	172	20

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	4.5	6.3
4: Strong (%)	41.6	31.3
3: Average (%)	37.7	43.8
2: Weak (%)	13.6	18.8
1: Very weak (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	154	16

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0
5: Very strong (%)	9.0	9.5
4: Strong (%)	35.1	14.3
3: Average (%)	45.2	52.4
2: Weak (%)	10.1	19.0
1: Very weak (%)	0.5	4.8
Total (N)	188	21

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	11.2	9.1
4: Strong (%)	41.1	18.2
3: Average (%)	30.8	63.6
2: Weak (%)	14.0	9.1
1: Very weak (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	107	11

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	4.6	12.5
4: Strong (%)	34.5	25.0
3: Average (%)	39.1	43.8
2: Weak (%)	17.2	18.8
1: Very weak (%)	4.6	.
Total (N)	87	16

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	7.1	15.8
4: Strong (%)	32.9	26.3
3: Average (%)	49.3	31.6
2: Weak (%)	9.3	21.1
1: Very weak (%)	1.4	5.3
Total (N)	140	19

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
5: Very strong (%)	1.3	.
4: Strong (%)	21.1	23.1
3: Average (%)	47.4	38.5
2: Weak (%)	21.1	23.1
1: Very weak (%)	9.2	15.4
Total (N)	76	13

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.0	4.1
A (%)	14.0	28.0
B (%)	68.4	56.0
C (%)	16.6	16.0
D (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	193	25

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.2
A (%)	30.9	36.4
B (%)	58.2	45.5
C (%)	9.7	18.2
D (%)	0.6	.
F (%)	0.6	.
Total (N)	165	22

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5
A (%)	46.5	60.0
B (%)	44.6	28.0
C (%)	7.9	12.0
D (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	202	25

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.4
A (%)	38.3	48.0
B (%)	46.3	44.0
C (%)	13.9	8.0
D (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	201	25

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.5	4.6
A (%)	58.6	64.0
B (%)	36.0	32.0
C (%)	4.9	4.0
D (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	203	25

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.3
A (%)	48.0	50.0
B (%)	42.2	37.5
C (%)	8.8	8.3
D (%)	1.0	4.2
Total (N)	204	24

B4: Department's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	24.1	20.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.0	44.0
No clear vision (%)	34.5	28.0
Not familiar (%)	8.4	8.0
Total (N)	203	25

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	37.5
3: Agree (%)	61.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	5.2	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	115	16

B6: College's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	11.3	24.0
Vision with slow progress (%)	38.4	28.0
No clear vision (%)	22.7	20.0
Not familiar (%)	27.6	28.0
Total (N)	203	25

B7a: Department change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	50.0	32.0
Change for the worse (%)	13.9	20.0
Not really change (%)	36.1	48.0
Total (N)	202	25

B7b: College change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	42.0	44.0
Change for the worse (%)	11.5	16.0
Not really change (%)	46.5	40.0
Total (N)	200	25

B7c: NC State change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	36.8	44.0
Change for the worse (%)	13.4	28.0
Not really change (%)	49.8	28.0
Total (N)	201	25

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	37.5	25.0
3: Good (%)	34.5	37.5
2: Fair (%)	18.0	8.3
1: Poor (%)	10.0	29.2
Total (N)	200	24

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	39.6	32.0
3: Good (%)	29.7	24.0
2: Fair (%)	17.2	16.0
1: Poor (%)	13.5	28.0
Total (N)	192	25

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	35.1	25.0
3: Good (%)	31.9	37.5
2: Fair (%)	20.0	16.7
1: Poor (%)	13.0	20.8
Total (N)	185	24

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	30.8	28.0
3: Good (%)	41.2	36.0
2: Fair (%)	21.4	28.0
1: Poor (%)	6.6	8.0
Total (N)	182	25

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	47.5	33.3
3: Good (%)	31.1	33.3
2: Fair (%)	15.3	20.8
1: Poor (%)	6.0	12.5
Total (N)	183	24

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	27.0	20.0
3: Good (%)	28.6	24.0
2: Fair (%)	35.4	36.0
1: Poor (%)	9.0	20.0
Total (N)	189	25

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	38.7	24.0
3: Good (%)	22.2	20.0
2: Fair (%)	16.5	32.0
1: Poor (%)	22.7	24.0
Total (N)	194	25

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	25.3	23.8
3: Good (%)	29.9	19.0
2: Fair (%)	23.0	19.0
1: Poor (%)	21.8	38.1
Total (N)	174	21

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	16.3	16.7
3: Good (%)	36.2	29.2
2: Fair (%)	28.6	25.0
1: Poor (%)	18.9	29.2
Total (N)	196	24

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	26.6	19.0
3: Good (%)	30.2	23.8
2: Fair (%)	28.1	38.1
1: Poor (%)	15.1	19.0
Total (N)	192	21

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	39.6	36.4
3: Good (%)	33.7	27.3
2: Fair (%)	18.9	22.7
1: Poor (%)	7.7	13.6
Total (N)	169	22

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	55.4	41.7
3: Good (%)	33.9	33.3
2: Fair (%)	10.2	20.8
1: Poor (%)	0.6	4.2
Total (N)	177	24

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	22.7
3: Good (%)	34.1	36.4
2: Fair (%)	21.1	27.3
1: Poor (%)	9.2	13.6
Total (N)	185	22

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	32.4	20.8
3: Good (%)	31.3	16.7
2: Fair (%)	18.1	37.5
1: Poor (%)	18.1	25.0
Total (N)	182	24

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	36.0	18.2
3: Good (%)	38.3	31.8
2: Fair (%)	17.1	27.3
1: Poor (%)	8.6	22.7
Total (N)	175	22

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	12.6	31.6
3: Good (%)	41.7	26.3
2: Fair (%)	35.1	21.1
1: Poor (%)	10.6	21.1
Total (N)	151	19

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	11.4	17.6
3: Good (%)	39.4	41.2
2: Fair (%)	31.8	23.5
1: Poor (%)	17.4	17.6
Total (N)	132	17

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	6.4	6.7
3: Good (%)	34.9	60.0
2: Fair (%)	35.8	6.7
1: Poor (%)	22.9	26.7
Total (N)	109	15

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	16.8	14.3
3: Good (%)	49.6	50.0
2: Fair (%)	22.4	14.3
1: Poor (%)	11.2	21.4
Total (N)	125	14

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	11.6	31.3
3: Good (%)	33.9	31.3
2: Fair (%)	38.0	12.5
1: Poor (%)	16.5	25.0
Total (N)	121	16

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	11.3	14.3
3: Good (%)	33.8	35.7
2: Fair (%)	24.1	14.3
1: Poor (%)	30.8	35.7
Total (N)	133	14

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	11.8	27.3
3: Good (%)	35.3	27.3
2: Fair (%)	35.3	9.1
1: Poor (%)	17.6	36.4
Total (N)	85	11

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	4.7	20.0
3: Good (%)	24.3	40.0
2: Fair (%)	39.1	13.3
1: Poor (%)	32.0	26.7
Total (N)	169	15

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	7.1	25.0
3: Good (%)	32.3	25.0
2: Fair (%)	36.2	25.0
1: Poor (%)	24.4	25.0
Total (N)	127	12

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	17.1	36.4
3: Good (%)	37.8	27.3
2: Fair (%)	29.7	18.2
1: Poor (%)	15.3	18.2
Total (N)	111	11

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	43.8
3: Good (%)	51.1	37.5
2: Fair (%)	15.3	18.8
1: Poor (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	131	16

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	15.3	35.7
3: Good (%)	45.2	28.6
2: Fair (%)	32.3	14.3
1: Poor (%)	7.3	21.4
Total (N)	124	14

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	14.4	38.5
3: Good (%)	33.9	15.4
2: Fair (%)	35.6	23.1
1: Poor (%)	16.1	23.1
Total (N)	118	13

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	20.7	28.6
3: Good (%)	55.4	28.6
2: Fair (%)	16.5	35.7
1: Poor (%)	7.4	7.1
Total (N)	121	14

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	2.9	.
3: Good (%)	20.8	34.8
2: Fair (%)	39.9	26.1
1: Poor (%)	36.4	39.1
Total (N)	173	23

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	1.6	.
3: Good (%)	14.8	33.3
2: Fair (%)	39.1	38.9
1: Poor (%)	44.5	27.8
Total (N)	128	18

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	3.1	4.5
3: Good (%)	41.1	31.8
2: Fair (%)	33.7	36.4
1: Poor (%)	22.1	27.3
Total (N)	163	22

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	12.8	14.3
3: Good (%)	48.8	28.6
2: Fair (%)	25.6	35.7
1: Poor (%)	12.8	21.4
Total (N)	125	14

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	13.6
3: Good (%)	53.8	31.8
2: Fair (%)	21.4	36.4
1: Poor (%)	4.8	18.2
Total (N)	145	22

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	6.4	13.3
3: Good (%)	38.6	26.7
2: Fair (%)	34.3	40.0
1: Poor (%)	20.7	20.0
Total (N)	140	15

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.9
4: Excellent (%)	5.5	10.5
3: Good (%)	21.9	15.8
2: Fair (%)	28.1	31.6
1: Poor (%)	44.5	42.1
Total (N)	128	19

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	13.3	8.7
3: Good (%)	50.3	30.4
2: Fair (%)	24.5	26.1
1: Poor (%)	11.9	34.8
Total (N)	143	23

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.2	40.0
3: Agree (%)	31.2	44.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	16.0
Total (N)	199	25

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.0	36.0
3: Agree (%)	40.1	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.8	12.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	12.0
Total (N)	197	25

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.7	44.0
3: Agree (%)	32.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.7	4.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	12.0
Total (N)	197	25

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.7	12.0
3: Agree (%)	44.7	44.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.5	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.2	28.0
Total (N)	197	25

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.7	4.0
3: Agree (%)	29.7	44.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.2	16.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.4	36.0
Total (N)	192	25

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very familiar (%)	33.2	26.1
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	45.7	47.8
2: Not very familiar (%)	15.6	13.0
1: Not at all familiar (%)	5.5	13.0
Total (N)	199	23

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very well (%)	5.0	.
3: Fairly well (%)	25.6	36.0
2: Not very well (%)	51.3	36.0
1: Not at all (%)	18.1	28.0
Total (N)	199	25

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very well (%)	4.5	.
3: Fairly well (%)	26.6	32.0
2: Not very well (%)	53.3	44.0
1: Not at all (%)	15.6	24.0
Total (N)	199	25

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very well (%)	11.1	12.0
3: Fairly well (%)	39.2	32.0
2: Not very well (%)	37.7	44.0
1: Not at all (%)	12.1	12.0
Total (N)	199	25

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very well (%)	32.3	16.0
3: Fairly well (%)	40.9	44.0
2: Not very well (%)	19.2	28.0
1: Not at all (%)	7.6	12.0
Total (N)	198	25

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.0	8.0
3: Agree (%)	43.8	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.3	44.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.9	8.0
Total (N)	194	25

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.8	32.0
3: Agree (%)	38.3	48.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.8	12.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	8.0
Total (N)	196	25

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	36.6	24.0
3: Good (%)	32.5	36.0
2: Fair (%)	20.4	20.0
1: Poor (%)	10.5	20.0
Total (N)	191	25

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	10.1	15.8
3: Good (%)	51.7	47.4
2: Fair (%)	30.9	21.1
1: Poor (%)	7.4	15.8
Total (N)	149	19

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	5.3	11.1
3: Good (%)	31.1	27.8
2: Fair (%)	41.7	33.3
1: Poor (%)	22.0	27.8
Total (N)	132	18

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	4.0	6.3
3: Good (%)	28.8	25.0
2: Fair (%)	45.6	43.8
1: Poor (%)	21.6	25.0
Total (N)	125	16

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.6	5.9
3: Agree (%)	48.6	35.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	47.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.2	11.8
Total (N)	105	17

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.7	13.3
3: Agree (%)	48.1	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	26.9	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.3	20.0
Total (N)	104	15

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.8	6.7
3: Agree (%)	31.1	13.3
2: Disagree (%)	30.1	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	32.0	46.7
Total (N)	103	15

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Very effective (%)	9.3	37.5
3: Somewhat effective (%)	57.4	12.5
2: Not very effective (%)	14.8	37.5
1: Not at all effective (%)	18.5	12.5
Total (N)	54	8

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Very important (%)	62.1	56.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.3	36.0
2: Not very important (%)	6.2	4.0
1: Not at all important (%)	0.5	4.0
Total (N)	195	25

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/Multiculturalism	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	59.0	100.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	34.0	.
2: Not very important (%)	6.0	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	200	24

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.9
4: Very important (%)	48.7	91.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	38.2	8.3
2: Not very important (%)	12.6	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	199	24

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	10.5
3: Agree (%)	67.6	21.1
2: Disagree (%)	21.2	52.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	15.8
Total (N)	170	19

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.7	16.7
3: Agree (%)	55.3	11.1
2: Disagree (%)	24.8	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	22.2
Total (N)	141	18

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.9	11.8
3: Agree (%)	61.8	29.4
2: Disagree (%)	19.9	35.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	23.5
Total (N)	136	17

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.8	12.5
3: Agree (%)	64.1	31.3
2: Disagree (%)	19.7	31.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	25.0
Total (N)	142	16

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.3	21.1
3: Agree (%)	58.4	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	8.4	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	26.3
Total (N)	178	19

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.9	15.0
3: Agree (%)	53.8	35.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.0	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	25.0
Total (N)	156	20

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.8	15.0
3: Agree (%)	54.3	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.2	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	25.0
Total (N)	151	20

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.0	40.9
3: Agree (%)	45.5	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	4.5
Total (N)	198	22

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.4	52.9
3: Agree (%)	45.8	35.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9
Total (N)	168	17

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	47.2	34.8
3: Agree (%)	43.2	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	6.0	8.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	8.7
Total (N)	199	23

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.6	58.3
3: Agree (%)	44.9	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.4	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	89	12

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.9	39.1
3: Agree (%)	45.9	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.2	4.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	8.7
Total (N)	181	23

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.6	36.4
3: Agree (%)	43.8	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.6	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	13.6
Total (N)	192	22

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.4	40.0
3: Agree (%)	46.0	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	0.6	5.0
Total (N)	163	20

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.1	40.9
3: Agree (%)	38.2	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.2	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	4.5
Total (N)	157	22

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.1	54.5
3: Agree (%)	30.5	40.9
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	174	22

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.1	63.2
3: Agree (%)	29.4	31.6
2: Disagree (%)	1.3	5.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	160	19

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.9	52.2
3: Agree (%)	28.5	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	8.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	.
Total (N)	172	23

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.4	70.6
3: Agree (%)	25.9	23.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.9	.
Total (N)	108	17

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.6	52.2
3: Agree (%)	26.8	30.4
2: Disagree (%)	2.4	13.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	4.3
Total (N)	168	23

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	30.6	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.3	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	9.1
Total (N)	173	22

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.5	57.1
3: Agree (%)	32.1	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	0.6	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	165	21

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	68.4	60.0
3: Agree (%)	26.5	35.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.3	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	.
Total (N)	155	20

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	31.3	52.2
3: Some (%)	48.4	30.4
2: A little (%)	16.7	13.0
1: Not at all (%)	3.6	4.3
Total (N)	192	23

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.7
4: A great deal (%)	37.2	75.0
3: Some (%)	45.9	16.7
2: A little (%)	13.3	8.3
1: Not at all (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	196	24

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
4: A great deal (%)	47.5	75.0
3: Some (%)	25.8	16.7
2: A little (%)	13.6	.
1: None (%)	13.1	8.3
Total (N)	198	24

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	32.5	29.2
3: Some (%)	28.4	41.7
2: A little (%)	22.3	16.7
1: None (%)	16.8	12.5
Total (N)	197	24

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	10.7	17.4
3: Some (%)	21.3	13.0
2: A little (%)	19.3	26.1
1: None (%)	48.7	43.5
Total (N)	197	23

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	17.2	43.5
3: Some (%)	28.3	21.7
2: A little (%)	24.2	21.7
1: None (%)	30.3	13.0
Total (N)	198	23

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	23.4	41.7
3: Some (%)	20.3	16.7
2: A little (%)	19.8	8.3
1: None (%)	36.5	33.3
Total (N)	197	24

E9f: Interest in advising international students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	17.9	41.7
3: Some (%)	20.9	37.5
2: A little (%)	28.6	4.2
1: None (%)	32.7	16.7
Total (N)	196	24

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.6	29.2
3: Agree (%)	36.7	25.0
2: Disagree (%)	31.2	29.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.6	16.7
Total (N)	199	24

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.5	70.8
3: Agree (%)	35.0	29.2
2: Disagree (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	200	24

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.1	30.4
3: Agree (%)	73.6	65.2
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	4.3
Total (N)	193	23

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	29.2
3: Agree (%)	43.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.6	12.5
Total (N)	198	24

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.3	7.7
3: Agree (%)	54.0	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	36.0	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.8	7.7
Total (N)	139	13

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.0	.
3: Agree (%)	40.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.0	40.0
Total (N)	100	10

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.7	33.3
3: Agree (%)	48.2	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.1	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	12.5
Total (N)	199	24

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
Frequently (%)	45.3	29.2
Sometimes (%)	44.8	41.7
Seldom (%)	7.5	20.8
Never (%)	2.5	8.3
Total (N)	201	24

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
Frequently (%)	33.3	20.8
Sometimes (%)	38.8	45.8
Seldom (%)	13.4	20.8
Never (%)	14.4	12.5
Total (N)	201	24

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
Frequently (%)	45.0	33.3
Sometimes (%)	45.0	25.0
Seldom (%)	7.5	29.2
Never (%)	2.5	12.5
Total (N)	200	24

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
Frequently (%)	38.3	33.3
Sometimes (%)	39.3	33.3
Seldom (%)	13.4	20.8
Never (%)	9.0	12.5
Total (N)	201	24

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
Frequently (%)	11.9	16.7
Sometimes (%)	26.9	12.5
Seldom (%)	26.4	25.0
Never (%)	34.8	45.8
Total (N)	201	24

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
Frequently (%)	21.9	29.2
Sometimes (%)	44.3	37.5
Seldom (%)	14.4	20.8
Never (%)	19.4	12.5
Total (N)	201	24

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.3
Frequently (%)	8.0	20.8
Sometimes (%)	29.6	25.0
Seldom (%)	17.1	12.5
Never (%)	45.2	41.7
Total (N)	199	24

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
Frequently (%)	23.4	25.0
Sometimes (%)	31.8	41.7
Seldom (%)	13.4	4.2
Never (%)	31.3	29.2
Total (N)	201	24

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.3
Frequently (%)	9.0	25.0
Sometimes (%)	24.9	20.8
Seldom (%)	17.9	8.3
Never (%)	48.3	45.8
Total (N)	201	24

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	46.2	39.1
3: Satisfied (%)	42.7	52.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.1	8.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	199	23

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	36.7	30.4
3: Satisfied (%)	44.7	34.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.1	30.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.5	4.3
Total (N)	199	23

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	56.8	52.2
3: Satisfied (%)	29.1	43.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.6	4.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	199	23

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	71.7	65.2
3: Satisfied (%)	22.7	34.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	198	23

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.3	34.8
3: Satisfied (%)	41.9	39.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.2	13.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	13.0
Total (N)	198	23

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.3	17.4
3: Satisfied (%)	62.2	56.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	21.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.1	4.3
Total (N)	196	23

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.1	35.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.8	52.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	11.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	135	17

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.5	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	34.8	21.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.6	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.1	42.9
Total (N)	115	14

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.2	15.4
3: Satisfied (%)	20.4	7.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.7	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.7	61.5
Total (N)	98	13

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.4	22.7
3: Agree (%)	59.0	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	14.4	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	13.6
Total (N)	188	22

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	19.0
3: Agree (%)	59.4	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.7	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	14.3
Total (N)	175	21

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.0	22.2
3: Agree (%)	50.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	31.4	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.7	22.2
Total (N)	86	9

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.7	13.3
3: Agree (%)	58.6	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	13.8	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.9	20.0
Total (N)	116	15

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	18.2
3: Agree (%)	50.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.4	13.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.1	18.2
Total (N)	176	22

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.2	35.0
3: Agree (%)	51.2	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	15.0
Total (N)	168	20

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	30.0
3: Agree (%)	39.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	35.8	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.6	20.0
Total (N)	81	10

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.0	25.0
3: Agree (%)	49.0	41.7
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.0	25.0
Total (N)	100	12

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.2	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	49.0	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.6	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.2	9.1
Total (N)	194	22

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	38.1	5.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.9	57.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.6	21.1
Total (N)	160	19

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.7	23.8
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.5	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.8
Total (N)	178	21

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	25.5	21.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.3	36.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.8	36.8
Total (N)	157	19

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.1	26.3
3: Satisfied (%)	60.7	68.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	5.3
Total (N)	183	19

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.9	38.1
3: Satisfied (%)	67.2	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	.
Total (N)	186	21

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	28.5	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.1	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.5	33.3
Total (N)	172	18

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.3	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	41.8	18.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.4	31.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.5	37.5
Total (N)	153	16

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.7	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	28.1	11.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.0	27.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	30.1	44.4
Total (N)	146	18

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	67.3	13.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.8	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.9	26.7
Total (N)	101	15

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.1	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	51.6	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.0	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.3	8.3
Total (N)	124	12

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.1	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.2	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	192	21

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.2	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	71.6	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.7	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.6	4.8
Total (N)	176	21

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.8	37.5
3: Satisfied (%)	73.3	43.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	12.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.6	6.3
Total (N)	90	16

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	White	Faculty of Color
Yes (%)	21.3	26.1
No (%)	77.2	69.6
Don't know (%)	1.5	4.3
Total (N)	197	23

G6: Mentor helpfulness	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very helpful (%)	61.9	66.7
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	21.4	16.7
2: Not very helpful (%)	7.1	16.7
1: Not at all helpful (%)	9.5	.
Total (N)	42	6

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.0	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	30.8	16.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.7	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.6	16.7
Total (N)	91	12

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.3	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	41.3	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.8	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	12.5
Total (N)	80	8

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.5	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	33.8	.
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.8	44.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.9	33.3
Total (N)	71	9

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	31.1	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	45.9	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.1	28.6
Total (N)	61	7

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	33.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.5	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.4	.
Total (N)	62	6

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	33.9	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.0	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.7	.
Total (N)	59	6

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.9	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	27.6	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.8	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	32.8	14.3
Total (N)	58	7

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.2	22.7
3: Agree (%)	45.7	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	11.7	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	188	22

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.4	17.4
3: Agree (%)	48.9	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	11.1	30.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	190	23

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.7	31.6
3: Agree (%)	51.6	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	6.3	10.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	126	19

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	44.1	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	5.1	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	118	18

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.6	35.7
3: Agree (%)	43.0	35.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	14.3
Total (N)	114	14

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.6	22.2
3: Agree (%)	44.0	38.9
2: Disagree (%)	23.4	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	22.2
Total (N)	175	18

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.7	15.8
3: Agree (%)	44.9	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	11.9	21.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.5	5.3
Total (N)	176	19

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.0	11.1
3: Agree (%)	32.0	27.8
2: Disagree (%)	33.7	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.3	16.7
Total (N)	175	18

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.9	29.4
3: Agree (%)	37.9	29.4
2: Disagree (%)	19.5	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.8	23.5
Total (N)	169	17

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very well (%)	23.3	14.3
3: Fairly well (%)	34.4	52.4
2: Not very well (%)	19.6	9.5
1: Not at all (%)	22.8	23.8
Total (N)	189	21

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	49.5	34.8
Yes (%)	50.5	65.2
Total (N)	194	23

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	53.6	65.2
Yes (%)	46.4	34.8
Total (N)	194	23

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	64.9	82.6
Yes (%)	35.1	17.4
Total (N)	194	23

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	63.4	87.0
Yes (%)	36.6	13.0
Total (N)	194	23

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very well (%)	39.3	31.8
3: Fairly well (%)	34.6	45.5
2: Not very well (%)	15.7	18.2
1: Not at all (%)	10.5	4.5
Total (N)	191	22

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very well (%)	40.8	36.4
3: Fairly well (%)	31.9	40.9
2: Not very well (%)	16.8	18.2
1: Not at all (%)	10.5	4.5
Total (N)	191	22

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	10.5
3: Agree (%)	43.8	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	21.5	26.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.9	15.8
Total (N)	144	19

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.9	36.8
3: Agree (%)	45.8	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	14.1	10.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	15.8
Total (N)	142	19

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.3	11.1
3: Agree (%)	55.2	72.2
2: Disagree (%)	28.2	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	5.6
Total (N)	181	18

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.6	12.5
3: Agree (%)	50.3	43.8
2: Disagree (%)	34.4	37.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.6	6.3
Total (N)	157	16

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.1	.
3: Agree (%)	40.5	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.7	20.0
Total (N)	79	5

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.1	20.0
3: Agree (%)	52.4	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	82	10

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	55.4	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.2	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.0	.
Total (N)	92	10

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.8	15.4
3: Agree (%)	41.3	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	42.1	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.9	23.1
Total (N)	126	13

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	25.0
3: Agree (%)	48.0	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.7	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.4	5.0
Total (N)	179	20

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	38.9
3: Agree (%)	46.9	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.9	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	5.6
Total (N)	147	18

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.6	25.0
3: Agree (%)	38.0	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.7	12.5
Total (N)	92	8

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.8	36.4
3: Agree (%)	44.6	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	27.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.3	.
Total (N)	74	11

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	43.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.4	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.0	8.3
Total (N)	109	12

H13f: Department rewards professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	21.4
3: Agree (%)	49.6	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	27.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.3	.
Total (N)	137	14

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	White	Faculty of Color
Has experience (%)	56.5	44.4
No experience (%)	43.5	55.6
Total (N)	138	18

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	51.4	61.1
Yes (%)	48.6	38.9
Total (N)	138	18

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	65.9	83.3
Yes (%)	34.1	16.7
Total (N)	138	18

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	92.0	100.0
Yes (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	138	18

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	98.6	94.4
Yes (%)	1.4	5.6
Total (N)	138	18

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.9	27.3
3: Agree (%)	67.4	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	19.6	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.2	.
Total (N)	92	11

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.8	21.4
3: Agree (%)	55.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	31.1	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	7.1
Total (N)	103	14

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.0	23.1
3: Agree (%)	64.2	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.0	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.8	7.7
Total (N)	106	13

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.1	23.1
3: Agree (%)	57.1	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.0	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	7.7
Total (N)	105	13

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.7	28.6
3: Agree (%)	62.9	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	89	7

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	59.6	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.0	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.0	.
Total (N)	89	9

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.0	30.0
3: Agree (%)	59.8	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	18.3	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.0	.
Total (N)	82	10

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	59.3	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.4	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.8	.
Total (N)	86	9

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	42.8	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	26.0	35.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	16.8	21.4
Total (N)	173	14

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	.
3: Agree (%)	31.6	30.0
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	30.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.3	40.0
Total (N)	133	10

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.6	1.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.4	.
3: Agree (%)	12.3	.
2: Disagree (%)	35.6	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	50.7	50.0
Total (N)	146	12

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.9	.
3: Agree (%)	17.9	6.3
2: Disagree (%)	40.7	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	38.6	43.8
Total (N)	140	16

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	1.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.0	5.0
3: Agree (%)	14.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	34.1	45.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	48.8	50.0
Total (N)	164	20

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very well (%)	26.4	21.7
3: Fairly well (%)	40.9	39.1
2: Not very well (%)	18.7	26.1
1: Not at all (%)	14.0	13.0
Total (N)	193	23

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.9	41.2
3: Agree (%)	46.6	35.3
2: Disagree (%)	15.9	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.6	5.9
Total (N)	176	17

J4: I have access to benefits information	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.1	40.9
3: Agree (%)	53.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.2	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	194	22

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.3	5.9
3: Agree (%)	32.3	23.5
2: Disagree (%)	29.8	41.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	28.6	29.4
Total (N)	161	17

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.7	11.8
3: Agree (%)	52.8	47.1
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.1	17.6
Total (N)	144	17

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.9	22.2
3: Agree (%)	64.4	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.9	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.9	11.1
Total (N)	101	9

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	2.6	4.3
3: Agree (%)	32.6	26.1
2: Disagree (%)	35.2	43.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.5	26.1
Total (N)	193	23

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.2	14.3
3: Agree (%)	51.1	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	14.3
Total (N)	190	21

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.7	8.7
3: Agree (%)	57.8	56.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.1	21.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.4	13.0
Total (N)	187	23

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9
4: Very important (%)	79.8	90.9
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.1	9.1
2: Not very important (%)	2.6	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	193	22

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	4.0
4: Very important (%)	79.8	95.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	15.0	4.5
2: Not very important (%)	3.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	193	22

J11c: Importance of family leave time	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	4.0
4: Very important (%)	81.8	95.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	15.6	4.5
2: Not very important (%)	1.6	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	192	22

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9
4: Very important (%)	74.5	85.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	20.3	14.3
2: Not very important (%)	2.1	.
1: Not at all important (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	192	21

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	4.0
4: Very important (%)	61.8	95.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.3	4.5
2: Not very important (%)	6.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	191	22

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Very important (%)	64.6	77.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	26.6	18.2
2: Not very important (%)	5.2	4.5
1: Not at all important (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	192	22

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	27.3
3: Agree (%)	46.1	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.8	9.1
Total (N)	193	22

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	22.7
3: Agree (%)	55.4	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	19.7	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	193	22

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.0	22.7
3: Agree (%)	56.7	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.0	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	187	22

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.3	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	47.4	13.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.9	54.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.4	13.6
Total (N)	192	22

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.5	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	44.7	20.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.1	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.7	20.0
Total (N)	38	5

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.8	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	47.2	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.1	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.0	36.4
Total (N)	193	22

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.0	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	64.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0
Total (N)	25	5

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	13.6
3: Satisfied (%)	52.6	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.5	13.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.2	18.2
Total (N)	190	22

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.1	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	38.3	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.4	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.2	33.3
Total (N)	188	21

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.9	13.6
3: Satisfied (%)	51.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.9	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.2	18.2
Total (N)	188	22

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.5	23.8
3: Satisfied (%)	57.5	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.3	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.7	4.8
Total (N)	193	21

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.2	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	31.3	38.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.5	23.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	24.0	28.6
Total (N)	179	21

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	0.8	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	32.8	31.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.6	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.8	25.0
Total (N)	122	16

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	43.1	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.1	13.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.1	40.9
Total (N)	181	22

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.7	4.5
3: Satisfied (%)	28.1	22.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.6	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	37.6	50.0
Total (N)	178	22

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.3	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.2	.
Total (N)	49	3

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	65.4	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.5	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.2	.
Total (N)	26	3

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.9	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	70.3	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.6	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.2	5.6
Total (N)	155	18

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.6	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	64.2	40.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.3	40.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.9	9.1
Total (N)	190	22

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.0	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	78.2	76.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.8	4.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.8
Total (N)	188	21

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.2	13.6
3: Satisfied (%)	54.8	27.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.4	45.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.6	13.6
Total (N)	188	22

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.7	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	42.6	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.6	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.0	7.1
Total (N)	115	14

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	48.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.2	41.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.8	.
Total (N)	102	12

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	15.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.4	70.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.7	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	5.0
Total (N)	152	20

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.3	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.1	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.2	9.1
Total (N)	111	11

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.7	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.7	60.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.9	.
Total (N)	64	5

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.5	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.6	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.5	.
Total (N)	55	8

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.4
4: A lot (%)	7.3	22.7
3: Some (%)	20.2	31.8
2: A little (%)	24.9	9.1
1: None at all (%)	47.7	36.4
Total (N)	193	22

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Very likely (%)	8.3	27.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	28.1	27.3
2: Not very likely (%)	32.8	13.6
1: Not at all likely (%)	30.7	31.8
Total (N)	192	22

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.1	15.0
3: Satisfied (%)	68.1	45.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	10.0
Total (N)	185	20

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.4	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	61.6	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.2	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.8	4.8
Total (N)	190	21

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.9	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	59.6	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.8	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	.
Total (N)	109	10

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.8	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	68.6	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.6	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	102	12

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	65.5	83.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.6	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	55	6

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.4	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	63.6	72.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	9.1
Total (N)	132	11

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.9	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.8	9.1
Total (N)	115	11

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
Once a week or more (%)	10.9	14.3
A few times a month (%)	6.8	.
A few times a semester (%)	9.9	9.5
Once a semester (%)	4.7	9.5
Once a year (%)	7.8	4.8
Never (%)	59.9	61.9
Total (N)	192	21

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
Once a week or more (%)	2.1	4.8
A few times a month (%)	7.3	9.5
A few times a semester (%)	15.5	23.8
Once a semester (%)	7.3	4.8
Once a year (%)	6.2	.
Never (%)	61.7	57.1
Total (N)	193	21

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.3	1.4
Once a week or more (%)	0.5	.
A few times a month (%)	2.1	.
A few times a semester (%)	3.1	9.5
Once a semester (%)	2.6	4.8
Once a year (%)	4.7	4.8
Never (%)	87.0	81.0
Total (N)	192	21

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
Once a week or more (%)	2.1	5.0
A few times a month (%)	5.7	5.0
A few times a semester (%)	31.1	25.0
Once a semester (%)	20.7	.
Once a year (%)	20.2	30.0
Never (%)	20.2	35.0
Total (N)	193	20

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
Once a week or more (%)	2.1	.
A few times a month (%)	4.2	9.5
A few times a semester (%)	18.8	14.3
Once a semester (%)	13.0	.
Once a year (%)	12.0	14.3
Never (%)	50.0	61.9
Total (N)	192	21

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	28.6	50.0
3: Some (%)	25.0	22.7
2: A little (%)	16.1	22.7
1: None at all (%)	30.2	4.5
Total (N)	192	22

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.5	2.1
4: Very likely (%)	3.6	23.8
3: Somewhat likely (%)	15.6	9.5
2: Not very likely (%)	12.5	23.8
1: Not at all likely (%)	68.2	42.9
Total (N)	192	21

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	White	Faculty of Color
Mean # Hrs Work	51.5	54.0
more than 60 hrs (%)	11.1	23.8
51 to 60 hrs (%)	28.9	28.6
41 to 50 hrs (%)	37.9	28.6
40 hrs or less (%)	22.1	19.0
Total (N)	190	21

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	51.1	49.0
more than 50% of time (%)	38.5	36.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	45.8	50.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.5	9.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.6	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	0.5	.
0% of time (%)	.	4.5
Total (N)	192	22

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	9.4	4.8
Yes (%)	90.6	95.2
Total (N)	192	21

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	41.7	47.6
Yes (%)	58.3	52.4
Total (N)	192	21

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	44.3	33.3
Yes (%)	55.7	66.7
Total (N)	192	21

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	86.5	76.2
Yes (%)	13.5	23.8
Total (N)	192	21

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	54.2	57.1
Yes (%)	45.8	42.9
Total (N)	192	21

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.8	7.6
more than 50% of time (%)	0.5	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	1.6	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	10.4	22.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	24.0	18.2
1% to 5% of time (%)	39.6	50.0
0% of time (%)	24.0	9.1
Total (N)	192	22

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	40.4	25.0
Yes (%)	59.6	75.0
Total (N)	146	20

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	28.1	25.0
Yes (%)	71.9	75.0
Total (N)	146	20

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	21.6	17.4
more than 50% of time (%)	2.1	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	38.0	31.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	24.0	27.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.9	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	6.3	9.1
0% of time (%)	18.8	31.8
Total (N)	192	22

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.3	4.1
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	4.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	3.1	9.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.7	4.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	4.7	.
0% of time (%)	87.5	81.8
Total (N)	192	22

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.5	1.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.1	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.7	9.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	13.0	18.2
0% of time (%)	79.2	72.7
Total (N)	192	22

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	70.0	66.7
Yes (%)	30.0	33.3
Total (N)	40	6

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	65.0	100.0
Yes (%)	35.0	.
Total (N)	40	6

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	90.0	100.0
Yes (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	40	6

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	95.0	83.3
Yes (%)	5.0	16.7
Total (N)	40	6

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	80.0	66.7
Yes (%)	20.0	33.3
Total (N)	40	6

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	9.2	11.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.1	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	27.6	40.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	22.9	36.4
1% to 5% of time (%)	20.8	9.1
0% of time (%)	25.5	13.6
Total (N)	192	22

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	78.3	73.7
Yes (%)	21.7	26.3
Total (N)	143	19

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	20.3	21.1
Yes (%)	79.7	78.9
Total (N)	143	19

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	40.6	47.4
Yes (%)	59.4	52.6
Total (N)	143	19

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	70.6	68.4
Yes (%)	29.4	31.6
Total (N)	143	19

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	65.7	42.1
Yes (%)	34.3	57.9
Total (N)	143	19

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.2	0.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	0.5	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	0.5	4.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	2.6	.
0% of time (%)	96.4	95.5
Total (N)	192	22

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.6	3.7
more than 50% of time (%)	2.1	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	9.4	4.5
11% to 25% of time (%)	8.3	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	3.1	13.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	7.3	13.6
0% of time (%)	69.8	68.2
Total (N)	192	22

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	59.9	77.3
Yes (%)	40.1	22.7
Total (N)	192	22

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	63.0	77.3
Yes (%)	37.0	22.7
Total (N)	192	22

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	81.3	95.5
Yes (%)	18.8	4.5
Total (N)	192	22

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	84.9	95.5
Yes (%)	15.1	4.5
Total (N)	192	22

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	62.5	63.6
Yes (%)	37.5	36.4
Total (N)	192	22

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	72.4	72.7
Yes (%)	27.6	27.3
Total (N)	192	22

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	93.2	90.9
Yes (%)	6.8	9.1
Total (N)	192	22

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	21.1	23.8
A few times (%)	45.8	28.6
About once per month (%)	10.5	14.3
Two or three times per month (%)	7.9	4.8
At least once per week (%)	14.7	28.6
Total (N)	190	21

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	62.6	75.0
Once or twice (%)	19.5	15.0
Three to five times (%)	8.9	.
Six to ten times (%)	4.7	.
More than 10 times (%)	4.2	10.0
Total (N)	190	20

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	11.1	19.0
2 (%)	28.9	23.8
3 (%)	26.3	23.8
4 (%)	27.4	23.8
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	6.3	9.5
Total (N)	190	21

M7: Change how you spend your work time	White	Faculty of Color
I would change how I spent time (%)	69.5	68.4
I would not change a thing (%)	30.5	31.6
Total (N)	174	19

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	27.5	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	46.6	30.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.1	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.8	5.0
Total (N)	189	20

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	23.8
3: Agree (%)	43.4	47.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	19.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.1	9.5
Total (N)	189	21

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	61.9	57.1
3: Agree (%)	37.6	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	189	21

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	67.2	76.2
3: Agree (%)	30.2	23.8
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	189	21

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.6	33.3
3: Agree (%)	38.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	23.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.7	.
Total (N)	188	21

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	35.3
3: Agree (%)	53.5	35.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.2	29.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.6	.
Total (N)	185	17

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	51.4	55.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.9	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.9	5.0
Total (N)	183	20

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	24.8	35.3
3: Some (%)	36.9	35.3
2: A little (%)	14.6	17.6
1: None at all (%)	23.6	11.8
Total (N)	157	17

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	21.6	38.9
3: Some (%)	45.1	38.9
2: A little (%)	15.7	16.7
1: None at all (%)	17.6	5.6
Total (N)	153	18

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	8.6	17.6
3: Some (%)	32.8	23.5
2: A little (%)	24.1	47.1
1: None at all (%)	34.5	11.8
Total (N)	174	17

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	24.1	16.7
3: Some (%)	29.4	38.9
2: A little (%)	28.8	22.2
1: None at all (%)	17.6	22.2
Total (N)	170	18

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	19.2	33.3
3: Some (%)	26.9	27.8
2: A little (%)	29.9	16.7
1: None at all (%)	24.0	22.2
Total (N)	167	18

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	0.5	.
3: Some (%)	16.2	28.6
2: A little (%)	41.6	38.1
1: None at all (%)	41.6	33.3
Total (N)	185	21

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	11.2	19.0
3: Some (%)	25.5	14.3
2: A little (%)	35.6	28.6
1: None at all (%)	27.7	38.1
Total (N)	188	21

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	13.6	28.6
3: Some (%)	27.2	19.0
2: A little (%)	24.5	23.8
1: None at all (%)	34.8	28.6
Total (N)	184	21

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	1.4
4: A great deal (%)	10.6	13.3
3: Some (%)	20.5	.
2: A little (%)	26.7	.
1: None at all (%)	42.2	86.7
Total (N)	161	15

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	31.2	23.8
3: Some (%)	34.9	28.6
2: A little (%)	21.7	33.3
1: None at all (%)	12.2	14.3
Total (N)	189	21

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	30.3	38.1
3: Some (%)	32.4	23.8
2: A little (%)	25.5	23.8
1: None at all (%)	11.7	14.3
Total (N)	188	21

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	13.9	15.0
3: Some (%)	43.9	30.0
2: A little (%)	31.0	40.0
1: None at all (%)	11.2	15.0
Total (N)	187	20

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	7.3	.
3: Some (%)	25.1	10.0
2: A little (%)	34.6	65.0
1: None at all (%)	33.0	25.0
Total (N)	179	20

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	12.9	.
3: Some (%)	27.2	31.3
2: A little (%)	27.9	31.3
1: None at all (%)	32.0	37.5
Total (N)	147	16

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.2	5.0
3: Satisfied (%)	58.0	55.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.2	35.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	5.0
Total (N)	188	20

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
A lot more satisfied now (%)	8.5	23.8
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	37.6	19.0
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	24.3	23.8
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	19.0	28.6
A lot less satisfied now (%)	10.6	4.8
Total (N)	189	21

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	21.2	15.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	13.2	.
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	28.0	45.0
Yes - very seriously (%)	37.6	40.0
Total (N)	189	20

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	53.5	63.2
Yes - not very seriously (%)	21.4	15.8
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	18.2	10.5
Yes - very seriously (%)	7.0	10.5
Total (N)	187	19

Endnote:

1. "Faculty of Color" includes African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American respondents. Due to small cell sizes at this level of analysis,
this categorization of race/ethnicity was necessary to protect respondent confidentiality. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007