North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Humanities and Social Sciences
by Gender

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	Male	Female
..... No (%)	65.4	76.9
..... Yes (%)	34.6	23.1
Total (N)	127	104

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	18.9
3: Agree (%)	54.8	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.5	18.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	4.2
Total (N)	126	95

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.3	13.5
3: Agree (%)	52.4	36.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.8	27.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	22.9
Total (N)	126	96

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.4	10.9
3: Agree (%)	45.5	28.3
2: Disagree (%)	31.7	44.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.3	16.3
Total (N)	123	92

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	15.2	10.3
4: Strong (%)	33.3	31.0
3: Average (%)	45.7	51.7
2: Weak (%)	4.8	4.6
1: Very weak (%)	1.0	2.3
Total (N)	105	87

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
5: Very strong (%)	5.2	4.1
4: Strong (%)	45.4	34.2
3: Average (%)	37.1	39.7
2: Weak (%)	12.4	16.4
1: Very weak (%)	.	5.5
Total (N)	97	73

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	9.2	8.9
4: Strong (%)	37.0	27.8
3: Average (%)	43.7	48.9
2: Weak (%)	10.1	12.2
1: Very weak (%)	.	2.2
Total (N)	119	90

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
5: Very strong (%)	6.8	15.3
4: Strong (%)	47.5	30.5
3: Average (%)	32.2	35.6
2: Weak (%)	13.6	13.6
1: Very weak (%)	.	5.1
Total (N)	59	59

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
5: Very strong (%)	5.4	6.4
4: Strong (%)	33.9	31.9
3: Average (%)	42.9	36.2
2: Weak (%)	16.1	19.1
1: Very weak (%)	1.8	6.4
Total (N)	56	47

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	7.4	9.2
4: Strong (%)	34.0	29.2
3: Average (%)	47.9	46.2
2: Weak (%)	10.6	10.8
1: Very weak (%)	.	4.6
Total (N)	94	65

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
5: Very strong (%)	.	2.7
4: Strong (%)	19.2	24.3
3: Average (%)	53.8	35.1
2: Weak (%)	15.4	29.7
1: Very weak (%)	11.5	8.1
Total (N)	52	37

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.0	4.0
A (%)	14.8	16.7
B (%)	68.9	64.6
C (%)	15.6	17.7
D (%)	0.8	1.0
Total (N)	122	96

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.1
A (%)	35.0	27.4
B (%)	53.4	60.7
C (%)	10.7	10.7
D (%)	.	1.2
F (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	103	84

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.3	4.4
A (%)	45.2	51.5
B (%)	44.4	40.6
C (%)	9.5	6.9
D (%)	0.8	1.0
Total (N)	126	101

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.2	4.3
A (%)	38.9	40.0
B (%)	46.8	45.0
C (%)	11.9	15.0
D (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	126	100

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.5	4.6
A (%)	55.6	63.7
B (%)	38.9	31.4
C (%)	4.8	4.9
D (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	126	102

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	4.4	4.4
A (%)	48.0	48.5
B (%)	42.5	40.6
C (%)	7.9	9.9
D (%)	1.6	1.0
Total (N)	127	101

B4: Department's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	29.6	16.5
Vision with slow progress (%)	32.0	36.9
No clear vision (%)	32.0	35.9
Not familiar (%)	6.4	10.7
Total (N)	125	103

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.8	20.0
3: Agree (%)	51.3	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	6.6	5.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	1.8
Total (N)	76	55

B6: College's vision for the future	Male	Female
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	13.6	11.7
Vision with slow progress (%)	36.0	38.8
No clear vision (%)	23.2	21.4
Not familiar (%)	27.2	28.2
Total (N)	125	103

B7a: Department change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	54.8	39.8
Change for the worse (%)	13.7	15.5
Not really change (%)	31.5	44.7
Total (N)	124	103

B7b: College change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	43.1	41.2
Change for the worse (%)	13.8	9.8
Not really change (%)	43.1	49.0
Total (N)	123	102

B7c: NC State change in next five years	Male	Female
Change for the better (%)	38.7	36.3
Change for the worse (%)	20.2	8.8
Not really change (%)	41.1	54.9
Total (N)	124	102

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	46.3	23.8
3: Good (%)	34.1	35.6
2: Fair (%)	12.2	22.8
1: Poor (%)	7.3	17.8
Total (N)	123	101

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	49.6	25.5
3: Good (%)	29.4	28.6
2: Fair (%)	14.3	20.4
1: Poor (%)	6.7	25.5
Total (N)	119	98

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	42.6	23.4
3: Good (%)	35.7	28.7
2: Fair (%)	14.8	25.5
1: Poor (%)	7.0	22.3
Total (N)	115	94

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	23.9
3: Good (%)	40.9	40.2
2: Fair (%)	18.3	27.2
1: Poor (%)	5.2	8.7
Total (N)	115	92

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	51.3	38.9
3: Good (%)	30.8	32.2
2: Fair (%)	12.8	20.0
1: Poor (%)	5.1	8.9
Total (N)	117	90

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	31.6	19.6
3: Good (%)	31.6	23.7
2: Fair (%)	32.5	39.2
1: Poor (%)	4.3	17.5
Total (N)	117	97

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	46.3	25.5
3: Good (%)	24.0	19.4
2: Fair (%)	10.7	27.6
1: Poor (%)	19.0	27.6
Total (N)	121	98

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	33.6	14.8
3: Good (%)	29.9	27.3
2: Fair (%)	19.6	26.1
1: Poor (%)	16.8	31.8
Total (N)	107	88

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	19.7	12.2
3: Good (%)	40.2	29.6
2: Fair (%)	23.0	34.7
1: Poor (%)	17.2	23.5
Total (N)	122	98

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	36.1	12.1
3: Good (%)	31.1	27.5
2: Fair (%)	23.0	37.4
1: Poor (%)	9.8	23.1
Total (N)	122	91

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	50.5	25.6
3: Good (%)	27.6	39.5
2: Fair (%)	17.1	22.1
1: Poor (%)	4.8	12.8
Total (N)	105	86

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	64.3	39.5
3: Good (%)	27.0	43.0
2: Fair (%)	8.7	15.1
1: Poor (%)	.	2.3
Total (N)	115	86

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	45.2	20.7
3: Good (%)	33.0	35.9
2: Fair (%)	17.4	27.2
1: Poor (%)	4.3	16.3
Total (N)	115	92

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	43.5	15.4
3: Good (%)	30.4	28.6
2: Fair (%)	16.5	25.3
1: Poor (%)	9.6	30.8
Total (N)	115	91

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	45.9	19.3
3: Good (%)	33.9	42.0
2: Fair (%)	14.7	22.7
1: Poor (%)	5.5	15.9
Total (N)	109	88

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	15.7	13.6
3: Good (%)	36.0	44.4
2: Fair (%)	38.2	28.4
1: Poor (%)	10.1	13.6
Total (N)	89	81

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	13.8	10.1
3: Good (%)	37.5	42.0
2: Fair (%)	30.0	31.9
1: Poor (%)	18.8	15.9
Total (N)	80	69

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	8.3	3.8
3: Good (%)	30.6	48.1
2: Fair (%)	38.9	23.1
1: Poor (%)	22.2	25.0
Total (N)	72	52

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	23.2	7.0
3: Good (%)	50.0	49.1
2: Fair (%)	20.7	22.8
1: Poor (%)	6.1	21.1
Total (N)	82	57

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	14.5	13.1
3: Good (%)	30.3	37.7
2: Fair (%)	39.5	29.5
1: Poor (%)	15.8	19.7
Total (N)	76	61

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	14.5	8.5
3: Good (%)	34.2	33.8
2: Fair (%)	28.9	16.9
1: Poor (%)	22.4	40.8
Total (N)	76	71

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	16.7	9.5
3: Good (%)	29.6	40.5
2: Fair (%)	37.0	26.2
1: Poor (%)	16.7	23.8
Total (N)	54	42

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	6.0
3: Good (%)	24.8	26.5
2: Fair (%)	36.6	37.3
1: Poor (%)	32.7	30.1
Total (N)	101	83

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	10.5	6.3
3: Good (%)	35.5	27.0
2: Fair (%)	34.2	36.5
1: Poor (%)	19.7	30.2
Total (N)	76	63

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	23.2	13.2
3: Good (%)	33.3	41.5
2: Fair (%)	27.5	30.2
1: Poor (%)	15.9	15.1
Total (N)	69	53

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	35.7	28.6
3: Good (%)	46.4	54.0
2: Fair (%)	14.3	17.5
1: Poor (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	84	63

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	21.5	11.9
3: Good (%)	45.6	40.7
2: Fair (%)	26.6	35.6
1: Poor (%)	6.3	11.9
Total (N)	79	59

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	22.1	9.3
3: Good (%)	31.2	33.3
2: Fair (%)	35.1	33.3
1: Poor (%)	11.7	24.1
Total (N)	77	54

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	26.3	15.3
3: Good (%)	53.9	50.8
2: Fair (%)	14.5	23.7
1: Poor (%)	5.3	10.2
Total (N)	76	59

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	3.6	1.2
3: Good (%)	26.4	17.4
2: Fair (%)	36.4	40.7
1: Poor (%)	33.6	40.7
Total (N)	110	86

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	1.2	1.6
3: Good (%)	15.3	19.7
2: Fair (%)	38.8	39.3
1: Poor (%)	44.7	39.3
Total (N)	85	61

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	4.8	1.2
3: Good (%)	37.5	43.2
2: Fair (%)	40.4	25.9
1: Poor (%)	17.3	29.6
Total (N)	104	81

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	10.0	16.9
3: Good (%)	47.5	45.8
2: Fair (%)	30.0	22.0
1: Poor (%)	12.5	15.3
Total (N)	80	59

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	19.1	19.2
3: Good (%)	46.8	56.2
2: Fair (%)	26.6	19.2
1: Poor (%)	7.4	5.5
Total (N)	94	73

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	7.7	6.3
3: Good (%)	33.0	43.8
2: Fair (%)	37.4	31.3
1: Poor (%)	22.0	18.8
Total (N)	91	64

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.8
4: Excellent (%)	7.0	4.9
3: Good (%)	23.3	18.0
2: Fair (%)	26.7	31.1
1: Poor (%)	43.0	45.9
Total (N)	86	61

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	14.3	10.7
3: Good (%)	49.5	45.3
2: Fair (%)	28.6	20.0
1: Poor (%)	7.7	24.0
Total (N)	91	75

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.4	37.6
3: Agree (%)	35.8	28.7
2: Disagree (%)	9.8	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	12.9
Total (N)	123	101

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.2	35.0
3: Agree (%)	49.2	29.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.3	23.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	13.0
Total (N)	122	100

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	49.6	38.6
3: Agree (%)	36.4	29.7
2: Disagree (%)	10.7	14.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	16.8
Total (N)	121	101

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.8	14.0
3: Agree (%)	45.1	44.0
2: Disagree (%)	33.6	23.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.5	19.0
Total (N)	122	100

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.0	6.2
3: Agree (%)	26.7	37.1
2: Disagree (%)	42.5	35.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.8	21.6
Total (N)	120	97

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Very familiar (%)	39.0	24.2
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	44.7	47.5
2: Not very familiar (%)	13.8	17.2
1: Not at all familiar (%)	2.4	11.1
Total (N)	123	99

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very well (%)	4.0	5.0
3: Fairly well (%)	25.8	28.0
2: Not very well (%)	56.5	41.0
1: Not at all (%)	13.7	26.0
Total (N)	124	100

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very well (%)	4.8	3.0
3: Fairly well (%)	32.3	21.0
2: Not very well (%)	50.8	54.0
1: Not at all (%)	12.1	22.0
Total (N)	124	100

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very well (%)	13.7	8.0
3: Fairly well (%)	45.2	30.0
2: Not very well (%)	31.5	47.0
1: Not at all (%)	9.7	15.0
Total (N)	124	100

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Very well (%)	39.8	19.0
3: Fairly well (%)	43.9	38.0
2: Not very well (%)	12.2	30.0
1: Not at all (%)	4.1	13.0
Total (N)	123	100

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.8	7.1
3: Agree (%)	47.9	37.8
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	37.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	17.3
Total (N)	121	98

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.7	31.3
3: Agree (%)	36.9	42.4
2: Disagree (%)	12.3	21.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	5.1
Total (N)	122	99

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	46.6	21.4
3: Good (%)	32.2	33.7
2: Fair (%)	15.3	26.5
1: Poor (%)	5.9	18.4
Total (N)	118	98

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	14.4	5.6
3: Good (%)	51.5	50.7
2: Fair (%)	26.8	33.8
1: Poor (%)	7.2	9.9
Total (N)	97	71

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Excellent (%)	7.9	3.3
3: Good (%)	36.0	23.0
2: Fair (%)	36.0	47.5
1: Poor (%)	20.2	26.2
Total (N)	89	61

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Excellent (%)	7.4	.
3: Good (%)	25.9	31.7
2: Fair (%)	44.4	46.7
1: Poor (%)	22.2	21.7
Total (N)	81	60

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	5.8
3: Agree (%)	40.0	55.8
2: Disagree (%)	34.3	26.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.1	11.5
Total (N)	70	52

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.6	6.0
3: Agree (%)	39.1	54.0
2: Disagree (%)	29.0	28.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.3	12.0
Total (N)	69	50

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.0	3.9
3: Agree (%)	28.4	29.4
2: Disagree (%)	31.3	29.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	31.3	37.3
Total (N)	67	51

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very effective (%)	9.1	17.2
3: Somewhat effective (%)	60.6	41.4
2: Not very effective (%)	12.1	24.1
1: Not at all effective (%)	18.2	17.2
Total (N)	33	29

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Very important (%)	61.2	61.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	31.4	32.3
2: Not very important (%)	6.6	5.1
1: Not at all important (%)	0.8	1.0
Total (N)	121	99

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Very important (%)	52.5	76.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	37.7	21.6
2: Not very important (%)	8.2	2.0
1: Not at all important (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	122	102

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Very important (%)	39.7	69.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.8	24.5
2: Not very important (%)	15.7	5.9
1: Not at all important (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	121	102

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.7	10.6
3: Agree (%)	69.2	55.3
2: Disagree (%)	21.2	28.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	5.9
Total (N)	104	85

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.1	12.5
3: Agree (%)	53.7	45.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.2	34.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	7.8
Total (N)	95	64

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	15.8
3: Agree (%)	64.6	47.4
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	29.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	7.0
Total (N)	96	57

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.5	13.1
3: Agree (%)	68.0	49.2
2: Disagree (%)	14.4	31.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	6.6
Total (N)	97	61

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.9	23.2
3: Agree (%)	55.7	57.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.8	11.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	8.5
Total (N)	115	82

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.4	20.3
3: Agree (%)	55.9	45.9
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	24.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.9	9.5
Total (N)	102	74

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	15.5
3: Agree (%)	51.0	52.1
2: Disagree (%)	9.0	23.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	8.5
Total (N)	100	71

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.1	40.8
3: Agree (%)	43.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.6	4.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	5.1
Total (N)	122	98

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.5	45.6
3: Agree (%)	42.5	48.1
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.3
Total (N)	106	79

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.9	31.7
3: Agree (%)	38.0	50.5
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	9.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	7.9
Total (N)	121	101

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.8	40.5
3: Agree (%)	39.1	48.6
2: Disagree (%)	3.1	8.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.7
Total (N)	64	37

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	55.3	44.4
3: Agree (%)	42.1	51.1
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	3.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	1.1
Total (N)	114	90

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	58.0	40.0
3: Agree (%)	39.5	49.5
2: Disagree (%)	.	8.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	2.1
Total (N)	119	95

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.8	40.7
3: Agree (%)	38.2	58.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.0	1.2
Total (N)	102	81

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.0	44.3
3: Agree (%)	34.0	45.6
2: Disagree (%)	4.0	3.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	6.3
Total (N)	100	79

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.0	58.1
3: Agree (%)	28.2	36.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	2.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.5
Total (N)	110	86

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.8	60.5
3: Agree (%)	27.2	32.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	3.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	2.6
Total (N)	103	76

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	71.6	57.0
3: Agree (%)	25.7	34.9
2: Disagree (%)	1.8	4.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	3.5
Total (N)	109	86

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.4	67.3
3: Agree (%)	26.3	24.5
2: Disagree (%)	1.3	4.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.1
Total (N)	76	49

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.1	60.2
3: Agree (%)	24.1	31.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.9	6.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	2.4
Total (N)	108	83

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.9	55.3
3: Agree (%)	26.4	36.5
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	2.4
Total (N)	110	85

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.1	54.9
3: Agree (%)	26.9	39.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	3.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	2.4
Total (N)	104	82

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.0	60.0
3: Agree (%)	24.0	32.0
2: Disagree (%)	1.0	2.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	5.3
Total (N)	100	75

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	31.4	36.1
3: Some (%)	48.3	44.3
2: A little (%)	16.9	15.5
1: Not at all (%)	3.4	4.1
Total (N)	118	97

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: A great deal (%)	37.2	46.5
3: Some (%)	47.1	37.4
2: A little (%)	11.6	14.1
1: Not at all (%)	4.1	2.0
Total (N)	121	99

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	52.1	48.5
3: Some (%)	22.3	27.7
2: A little (%)	10.7	13.9
1: None (%)	14.9	9.9
Total (N)	121	101

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	30.3	34.3
3: Some (%)	30.3	29.3
2: A little (%)	21.3	22.2
1: None (%)	18.0	14.1
Total (N)	122	99

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	5.8	18.2
3: Some (%)	19.8	21.2
2: A little (%)	23.1	16.2
1: None (%)	51.2	44.4
Total (N)	121	99

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	13.9	27.3
3: Some (%)	23.8	32.3
2: A little (%)	28.7	18.2
1: None (%)	33.6	22.2
Total (N)	122	99

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	24.0	27.0
3: Some (%)	22.3	17.0
2: A little (%)	19.8	17.0
1: None (%)	33.9	39.0
Total (N)	121	100

E9f: Interest in advising international students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	17.6	23.8
3: Some (%)	20.2	25.7
2: A little (%)	31.9	18.8
1: None (%)	30.3	31.7
Total (N)	119	101

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.6	12.7
3: Agree (%)	37.2	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.1	34.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	19.6
Total (N)	121	102

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.8	71.6
3: Agree (%)	39.3	28.4
2: Disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	122	102

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	18.8
3: Agree (%)	74.2	70.8
2: Disagree (%)	5.8	10.4
Total (N)	120	96

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.0	16.0
3: Agree (%)	41.0	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.9	28.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	11.0
Total (N)	122	100

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.2	3.6
3: Agree (%)	55.2	53.6
2: Disagree (%)	35.4	33.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	8.9
Total (N)	96	56

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.1	.
3: Agree (%)	39.1	41.3
2: Disagree (%)	34.4	34.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	23.4	23.9
Total (N)	64	46

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.8	23.5
3: Agree (%)	44.6	51.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.2	14.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	10.8
Total (N)	121	102

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
Frequently (%)	39.0	49.0
Sometimes (%)	48.0	40.2
Seldom (%)	9.8	7.8
Never (%)	3.3	2.9
Total (N)	123	102

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
Frequently (%)	36.6	26.5
Sometimes (%)	40.7	38.2
Seldom (%)	13.0	15.7
Never (%)	9.8	19.6
Total (N)	123	102

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
Frequently (%)	45.1	42.2
Sometimes (%)	44.3	41.2
Seldom (%)	7.4	12.7
Never (%)	3.3	3.9
Total (N)	122	102

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
Frequently (%)	40.7	34.3
Sometimes (%)	39.0	38.2
Seldom (%)	10.6	18.6
Never (%)	9.8	8.8
Total (N)	123	102

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
Frequently (%)	13.0	11.8
Sometimes (%)	26.8	23.5
Seldom (%)	28.5	23.5
Never (%)	31.7	41.2
Total (N)	123	102

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
Frequently (%)	21.1	24.5
Sometimes (%)	46.3	40.2
Seldom (%)	17.1	12.7
Never (%)	15.4	22.5
Total (N)	123	102

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
Frequently (%)	9.0	9.9
Sometimes (%)	30.3	27.7
Seldom (%)	23.0	8.9
Never (%)	37.7	53.5
Total (N)	122	101

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
Frequently (%)	24.4	22.5
Sometimes (%)	35.8	29.4
Seldom (%)	12.2	12.7
Never (%)	27.6	35.3
Total (N)	123	102

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.9
Frequently (%)	9.8	11.8
Sometimes (%)	26.0	22.5
Seldom (%)	21.1	11.8
Never (%)	43.1	53.9
Total (N)	123	102

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	47.9	42.6
3: Satisfied (%)	42.1	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.1	10.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.8	1.0
Total (N)	121	101

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.2	34.7
3: Satisfied (%)	40.5	47.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.2	14.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.1	3.0
Total (N)	121	101

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	63.6	47.5
3: Satisfied (%)	23.1	39.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.9	11.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.3	1.0
Total (N)	121	101

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	73.6	68.0
3: Satisfied (%)	21.5	27.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.5	4.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	1.0
Total (N)	121	100

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.8	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	43.0	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.5	23.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.8	7.0
Total (N)	121	100

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.1	18.0
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	68.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	9.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	5.0
Total (N)	119	100

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.1	33.9
3: Satisfied (%)	60.2	45.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.7	18.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	1.7
Total (N)	93	59

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.9	15.7
3: Satisfied (%)	41.0	21.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	29.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.1	33.3
Total (N)	78	51

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.9	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	23.8	12.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.9	29.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	45.8
Total (N)	63	48

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.2	21.1
3: Agree (%)	60.0	56.8
2: Disagree (%)	12.2	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	6.3
Total (N)	115	95

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.8	16.1
3: Agree (%)	54.1	62.1
2: Disagree (%)	19.3	17.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	4.6
Total (N)	109	87

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.3	13.9
3: Agree (%)	49.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	30.5	27.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	8.3
Total (N)	59	36

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.4	21.8
3: Agree (%)	60.5	54.5
2: Disagree (%)	13.2	14.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.9	9.1
Total (N)	76	55

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.8	8.1
3: Agree (%)	56.3	43.0
2: Disagree (%)	24.1	30.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.8	18.6
Total (N)	112	86

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.9	28.8
3: Agree (%)	49.1	48.8
2: Disagree (%)	17.6	16.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	6.3
Total (N)	108	80

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.4	8.3
3: Agree (%)	40.0	38.9
2: Disagree (%)	30.9	36.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.7	16.7
Total (N)	55	36

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.9	14.3
3: Agree (%)	47.6	49.0
2: Disagree (%)	25.4	26.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	10.2
Total (N)	63	49

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.1	24.2
3: Satisfied (%)	45.3	50.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.6	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.0	7.1
Total (N)	117	99

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.7	10.5
3: Satisfied (%)	35.9	32.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.8	28.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.5	27.6
Total (N)	103	76

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.9	26.7
3: Satisfied (%)	73.4	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.7	5.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	1.1
Total (N)	109	90

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	2.5
3: Satisfied (%)	27.1	22.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.5	35.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	29.2	40.0
Total (N)	96	80

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.8	31.9
3: Satisfied (%)	67.6	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.0	9.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	4.4
Total (N)	111	91

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.7	26.6
3: Satisfied (%)	66.4	66.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.6	6.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	1.1
Total (N)	113	94

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	3.8
3: Satisfied (%)	27.0	27.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.4	34.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	36.0	34.2
Total (N)	111	79

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	1.5
3: Satisfied (%)	39.6	39.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.7	27.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.8	30.9
Total (N)	101	68

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	2.9
3: Satisfied (%)	25.5	27.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.4	34.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	28.7	35.7
Total (N)	94	70

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	5.8
3: Satisfied (%)	65.6	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	28.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.4	11.5
Total (N)	64	52

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	8.9
3: Satisfied (%)	52.5	44.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.3	10.7
Total (N)	80	56

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	43.2	44.2
3: Satisfied (%)	51.7	48.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	4.2	6.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.8	1.1
Total (N)	118	95

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.3	32.3
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	60.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	5.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	2.2
Total (N)	104	93

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.3	13.2
3: Satisfied (%)	67.9	69.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.2	13.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.5	3.8
Total (N)	53	53

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	Male	Female
Yes (%)	20.8	23.0
No (%)	77.5	75.0
Don't know (%)	1.7	2.0
Total (N)	120	100

G6: Mentor helpfulness	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.6
4: Very helpful (%)	52.0	73.9
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	24.0	17.4
2: Not very helpful (%)	12.0	4.3
1: Not at all helpful (%)	12.0	4.3
Total (N)	25	23

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.3	22.5
3: Satisfied (%)	31.7	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	47.6	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	22.5
Total (N)	63	40

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	15.2
3: Satisfied (%)	43.6	36.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.9	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.4	21.2
Total (N)	55	33

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	31.9	27.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	48.9	30.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.9	24.2
Total (N)	47	33

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.9	18.5
3: Satisfied (%)	36.6	22.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	48.8	37.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.8	22.2
Total (N)	41	27

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	11.5
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	19.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	31.0	46.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	26.2	23.1
Total (N)	42	26

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	41.5	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.1	45.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	24.4	16.7
Total (N)	41	24

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.1	11.5
3: Satisfied (%)	30.8	23.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	38.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	26.9
Total (N)	39	26

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.1	32.6
3: Agree (%)	52.5	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	7.6	19.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	8.7
Total (N)	118	92

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.0	28.1
3: Agree (%)	49.6	49.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.4	17.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.2
Total (N)	117	96

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.7	35.6
3: Agree (%)	51.2	54.2
2: Disagree (%)	5.8	8.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	1.7
Total (N)	86	59

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.2	41.8
3: Agree (%)	50.6	50.9
2: Disagree (%)	6.2	5.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.8
Total (N)	81	55

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.1	43.1
3: Agree (%)	49.4	31.4
2: Disagree (%)	11.7	9.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.9	15.7
Total (N)	77	51

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.6	29.1
3: Agree (%)	50.5	34.9
2: Disagree (%)	23.4	22.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	14.0
Total (N)	107	86

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	32.2
3: Agree (%)	50.0	41.4
2: Disagree (%)	12.0	13.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	12.6
Total (N)	108	87

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.4	22.1
3: Agree (%)	38.3	23.3
2: Disagree (%)	31.8	38.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	16.3
Total (N)	107	86

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.7	24.7
3: Agree (%)	49.5	21.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	25.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.5	28.4
Total (N)	105	81

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Very well (%)	26.1	17.9
3: Fairly well (%)	40.0	31.6
2: Not very well (%)	18.3	18.9
1: Not at all (%)	15.7	31.6
Total (N)	115	95

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	Male	Female
No (%)	40.7	56.6
Yes (%)	59.3	43.4
Total (N)	118	99

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	Male	Female
No (%)	43.2	68.7
Yes (%)	56.8	31.3
Total (N)	118	99

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	Male	Female
No (%)	56.8	78.8
Yes (%)	43.2	21.2
Total (N)	118	99

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	Male	Female
No (%)	75.4	54.5
Yes (%)	24.6	45.5
Total (N)	118	99

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.7
4: Very well (%)	45.8	29.5
3: Fairly well (%)	40.7	29.5
2: Not very well (%)	8.5	25.3
1: Not at all (%)	5.1	15.8
Total (N)	118	95

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8
4: Very well (%)	47.5	31.6
3: Fairly well (%)	36.4	28.4
2: Not very well (%)	10.2	25.3
1: Not at all (%)	5.9	14.7
Total (N)	118	95

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.6	16.9
3: Agree (%)	43.9	44.6
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	27.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	10.8
Total (N)	98	65

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.4	36.9
3: Agree (%)	50.0	36.9
2: Disagree (%)	11.5	16.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	9.2
Total (N)	96	65

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.0	8.0
3: Agree (%)	53.2	61.4
2: Disagree (%)	32.4	19.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.4	11.4
Total (N)	111	88

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.0	8.2
3: Agree (%)	51.0	47.9
2: Disagree (%)	35.0	34.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.0	9.6
Total (N)	100	73

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.1	2.9
3: Agree (%)	38.8	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	36.7	37.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	18.4	17.1
Total (N)	49	35

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.7	19.5
3: Agree (%)	51.0	56.1
2: Disagree (%)	33.3	19.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.9
Total (N)	51	41

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.8	4.4
3: Agree (%)	54.4	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	24.6	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.3	8.9
Total (N)	57	45

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.3	5.0
3: Agree (%)	45.6	38.3
2: Disagree (%)	39.2	38.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.9	18.3
Total (N)	79	60

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.6	14.8
3: Agree (%)	51.4	43.2
2: Disagree (%)	21.6	20.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.4	21.6
Total (N)	111	88

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.7	32.9
3: Agree (%)	45.3	45.7
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	8.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	12.9
Total (N)	95	70

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	18.2
3: Agree (%)	44.6	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	20.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	29.5
Total (N)	56	44

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	11.6
3: Agree (%)	50.0	37.2
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	20.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	30.2
Total (N)	42	43

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.1	3.8
3: Agree (%)	46.4	40.4
2: Disagree (%)	26.1	30.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.4	25.0
Total (N)	69	52

H13f: Department rewards professional service	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.5	6.3
3: Agree (%)	57.5	42.2
2: Disagree (%)	23.0	29.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	21.9
Total (N)	87	64

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	Male	Female
Has experience (%)	63.6	40.4
No experience (%)	36.4	59.6
Total (N)	99	57

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	Male	Female
No (%)	44.4	66.7
Yes (%)	55.6	33.3
Total (N)	99	57

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	Male	Female
No (%)	61.6	78.9
Yes (%)	38.4	21.1
Total (N)	99	57

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	Male	Female
No (%)	91.9	94.7
Yes (%)	8.1	5.3
Total (N)	99	57

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	Male	Female
No (%)	99.0	96.5
Yes (%)	1.0	3.5
Total (N)	99	57

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.3	13.2
3: Agree (%)	66.2	68.4
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	18.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	.
Total (N)	65	38

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.1	9.3
3: Agree (%)	58.1	46.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.0	37.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	7.0
Total (N)	74	43

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.3	15.9
3: Agree (%)	66.7	59.1
2: Disagree (%)	12.0	20.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	4.5
Total (N)	75	44

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	14.0
3: Agree (%)	57.3	58.1
2: Disagree (%)	18.7	20.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.0	7.0
Total (N)	75	43

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	6.7
3: Agree (%)	63.6	63.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.6	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	13.3
Total (N)	66	30

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.7	6.3
3: Agree (%)	60.6	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.1	12.5
Total (N)	66	32

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.3	3.1
3: Agree (%)	58.3	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	18.3	21.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	18.8
Total (N)	60	32

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.2	.
3: Satisfied (%)	59.1	62.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.2	24.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.6	13.8
Total (N)	66	29

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.1	7.8
3: Agree (%)	43.6	39.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	26.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	27.3
Total (N)	110	77

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.4	3.1
3: Agree (%)	38.5	23.1
2: Disagree (%)	41.0	43.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.1	30.8
Total (N)	78	65

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.7	1.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	1.1	1.4
3: Agree (%)	14.6	7.2
2: Disagree (%)	33.7	40.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	50.6	50.7
Total (N)	89	69

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.8	1.3
3: Agree (%)	25.0	7.9
2: Disagree (%)	38.8	44.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	32.5	46.1
Total (N)	80	76

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.1	3.5
3: Agree (%)	16.3	8.1
2: Disagree (%)	34.7	36.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	45.9	52.3
Total (N)	98	86

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very well (%)	29.1	22.2
3: Fairly well (%)	44.4	36.4
2: Not very well (%)	16.2	23.2
1: Not at all (%)	10.3	18.2
Total (N)	117	99

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.5	19.8
3: Agree (%)	50.9	38.3
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	21.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	21.0
Total (N)	112	81

J4: I have access to benefits information	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.6	41.8
3: Agree (%)	55.1	51.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.5	6.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	1.0
Total (N)	118	98

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.1	10.1
3: Agree (%)	27.3	36.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	35.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	37.4	17.7
Total (N)	99	79

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.2	8.3
3: Agree (%)	47.2	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	19.1	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	22.5	12.5
Total (N)	89	72

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.8	14.3
3: Agree (%)	57.4	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	20.6	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.3	9.5
Total (N)	68	42

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	1.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	3.4	2.0
3: Agree (%)	38.1	24.5
2: Disagree (%)	33.9	38.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	24.6	34.7
Total (N)	118	98

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.2	12.6
3: Agree (%)	50.0	51.6
2: Disagree (%)	12.9	25.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.9	10.5
Total (N)	116	95

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.9	6.3
3: Agree (%)	58.3	56.8
2: Disagree (%)	20.9	29.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	7.4
Total (N)	115	95

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9
4: Very important (%)	75.2	87.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	19.7	12.2
2: Not very important (%)	4.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	117	98

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Very important (%)	76.9	86.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.1	10.2
2: Not very important (%)	2.6	3.1
1: Not at all important (%)	3.4	.
Total (N)	117	98

J11c: Importance of family leave time	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9
4: Very important (%)	79.3	87.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	16.4	12.2
2: Not very important (%)	2.6	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	116	98

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
4: Very important (%)	70.9	81.3
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.2	16.7
2: Not very important (%)	2.6	1.0
1: Not at all important (%)	4.3	1.0
Total (N)	117	96

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.4	3.7
4: Very important (%)	59.5	72.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.3	23.7
2: Not very important (%)	6.9	4.1
1: Not at all important (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	116	97

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Very important (%)	63.8	68.4
3: Somewhat important (%)	23.3	28.6
2: Not very important (%)	7.8	2.0
1: Not at all important (%)	5.2	1.0
Total (N)	116	98

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	24.6	18.6
3: Agree (%)	43.2	51.5
2: Disagree (%)	27.1	16.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.1	13.4
Total (N)	118	97

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.2	21.6
3: Agree (%)	56.8	53.6
2: Disagree (%)	20.3	19.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.7	5.2
Total (N)	118	97

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	16.0
3: Agree (%)	55.7	57.4
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	21.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	5.3
Total (N)	115	94

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.6	21.9
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	41.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.4	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.2	11.5
Total (N)	118	96

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.0	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	36.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.0	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	24.0	22.2
Total (N)	25	18

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	10.3
3: Satisfied (%)	45.8	46.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.8	30.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.5	12.4
Total (N)	118	97

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	75.0	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	7.1
Total (N)	16	14

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.1	4.3
3: Satisfied (%)	55.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	29.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.6	16.0
Total (N)	118	94

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.5	2.1
3: Satisfied (%)	36.5	38.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.4	39.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.6	20.2
Total (N)	115	94

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	53.0	48.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.6	29.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.3	12.6
Total (N)	115	95

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.8	14.6
3: Satisfied (%)	62.7	51.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.1	28.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	6.3
Total (N)	118	96

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.7	3.3
3: Satisfied (%)	30.9	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.1	42.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	21.1
Total (N)	110	90

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.3	1.6
3: Satisfied (%)	30.7	34.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	44.0	39.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	24.0	23.8
Total (N)	75	63

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.5	9.5
3: Satisfied (%)	40.7	44.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.4	17.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.4	28.4
Total (N)	108	95

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.9	1.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.9	2.1
3: Satisfied (%)	25.7	29.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	29.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	39.0	38.9
Total (N)	105	95

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.1	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	68.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.2	21.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.1	5.3
Total (N)	33	19

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	17.4	16.7
Total (N)	23	6

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	3.8
3: Satisfied (%)	79.8	59.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.8	27.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	8.9
Total (N)	94	79

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.5	3.1
3: Satisfied (%)	62.6	60.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	30.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.4	5.2
Total (N)	115	97

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.9	11.6
3: Satisfied (%)	78.1	77.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.0	9.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	1.1
Total (N)	114	95

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.6	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	51.3	52.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.5	30.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.6	10.5
Total (N)	115	95

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.9	1.7
3: Satisfied (%)	47.8	40.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.0	40.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.2	18.3
Total (N)	69	60

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.0	4.2
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	45.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	40.9	39.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.1	10.4
Total (N)	66	48

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.6	3.8
3: Satisfied (%)	68.1	69.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.0	20.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	6.4
Total (N)	94	78

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.2	1.9
3: Satisfied (%)	59.4	64.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.1	26.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.2	7.5
Total (N)	69	53

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.8	3.7
3: Satisfied (%)	47.6	63.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	25.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.9	7.4
Total (N)	42	27

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.4	3.8
3: Satisfied (%)	64.9	65.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.3	26.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.4	3.8
Total (N)	37	26

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.0	1.8
4: A lot (%)	10.2	7.2
3: Some (%)	25.4	16.5
2: A little (%)	22.0	24.7
1: None at all (%)	42.4	51.5
Total (N)	118	97

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very likely (%)	10.3	10.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	33.3	21.6
2: Not very likely (%)	27.4	35.1
1: Not at all likely (%)	29.1	33.0
Total (N)	117	97

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.0	4.5
3: Satisfied (%)	65.8	65.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.8	28.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	1.1
Total (N)	117	88

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	9.6
3: Satisfied (%)	59.8	59.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.9	28.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.5	2.1
Total (N)	117	94

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.4	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	63.3	47.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.3	7.5
Total (N)	79	40

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	11.4
3: Satisfied (%)	71.4	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.1	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	70	44

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.7	11.5
3: Satisfied (%)	80.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	34.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	3.8
Total (N)	35	26

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.7	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	67.5	60.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.6	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.2	3.0
Total (N)	77	66

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.8	18.8
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	72.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.7	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.8	.
Total (N)	78	48

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	1.6
Once a week or more (%)	19.7	1.0
A few times a month (%)	8.5	3.1
A few times a semester (%)	10.3	9.4
Once a semester (%)	6.0	4.2
Once a year (%)	9.4	5.2
Never (%)	46.2	77.1
Total (N)	117	96

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.3	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	4.2	.
A few times a month (%)	9.3	5.2
A few times a semester (%)	15.3	17.7
Once a semester (%)	11.0	2.1
Once a year (%)	5.1	6.3
Never (%)	55.1	68.8
Total (N)	118	96

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.3	1.3
Once a week or more (%)	0.8	.
A few times a month (%)	2.5	1.1
A few times a semester (%)	2.5	5.3
Once a semester (%)	3.4	2.1
Once a year (%)	5.1	4.2
Never (%)	85.6	87.4
Total (N)	118	95

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
Once a week or more (%)	3.4	1.1
A few times a month (%)	5.1	6.3
A few times a semester (%)	26.3	35.8
Once a semester (%)	18.6	18.9
Once a year (%)	22.9	18.9
Never (%)	23.7	18.9
Total (N)	118	95

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	1.9
Once a week or more (%)	3.4	.
A few times a month (%)	5.1	4.2
A few times a semester (%)	23.1	12.5
Once a semester (%)	12.0	11.5
Once a year (%)	13.7	10.4
Never (%)	42.7	61.5
Total (N)	117	96

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	33.3	27.8
3: Some (%)	23.1	26.8
2: A little (%)	14.5	19.6
1: None at all (%)	29.1	25.8
Total (N)	117	97

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.5	1.7
4: Very likely (%)	5.1	6.3
3: Somewhat likely (%)	11.9	18.9
2: Not very likely (%)	13.6	13.7
1: Not at all likely (%)	69.5	61.1
Total (N)	118	95

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	Male	Female
Mean # Hrs Work	52.1	51.4
more than 60 hrs (%)	12.2	12.5
51 to 60 hrs (%)	27.0	31.3
41 to 50 hrs (%)	42.6	30.2
40 hrs or less (%)	18.3	26.0
Total (N)	115	96

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	46.1	56.7
more than 50% of time (%)	30.8	47.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	52.1	39.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	14.5	9.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	2.6	2.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	1.0
0% of time (%)	.	1.0
Total (N)	117	97

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	10.3	7.3
Yes (%)	89.7	92.7
Total (N)	117	96

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	47.0	36.5
Yes (%)	53.0	63.5
Total (N)	117	96

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	41.0	45.8
Yes (%)	59.0	54.2
Total (N)	117	96

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	88.9	81.3
Yes (%)	11.1	18.8
Total (N)	117	96

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	Male	Female
No (%)	44.4	66.7
Yes (%)	55.6	33.3
Total (N)	117	96

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	6.7	7.2
more than 50% of time (%)	.	1.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.9	2.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	12.8	10.3
6% to 10% of time (%)	23.9	22.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	41.0	40.2
0% of time (%)	21.4	23.7
Total (N)	117	97

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	37.0	40.5
Yes (%)	63.0	59.5
Total (N)	92	74

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	Male	Female
No (%)	32.6	21.6
Yes (%)	67.4	78.4
Total (N)	92	74

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	24.2	17.6
more than 50% of time (%)	3.4	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	41.9	32.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	26.5	21.6
6% to 10% of time (%)	12.0	7.2
1% to 5% of time (%)	3.4	10.3
0% of time (%)	12.8	28.9
Total (N)	117	97

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.8	1.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	1.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	4.3	3.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.8	2.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.1	3.1
0% of time (%)	83.8	90.7
Total (N)	117	97

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.8	1.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	2.6	1.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	6.8	5.2
1% to 5% of time (%)	15.4	11.3
0% of time (%)	75.2	82.5
Total (N)	117	97

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	72.4	64.7
Yes (%)	27.6	35.3
Total (N)	29	17

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	62.1	82.4
Yes (%)	37.9	17.6
Total (N)	29	17

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	89.7	94.1
Yes (%)	10.3	5.9
Total (N)	29	17

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	93.1	94.1
Yes (%)	6.9	5.9
Total (N)	29	17

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	Male	Female
No (%)	82.8	70.6
Yes (%)	17.2	29.4
Total (N)	29	17

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	10.1	8.5
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.9	5.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	33.3	23.7
6% to 10% of time (%)	29.1	18.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	20.5	18.6
0% of time (%)	16.2	34.0
Total (N)	117	97

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	79.6	75.0
Yes (%)	20.4	25.0
Total (N)	98	64

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	23.5	15.6
Yes (%)	76.5	84.4
Total (N)	98	64

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	39.8	43.8
Yes (%)	60.2	56.3
Total (N)	98	64

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	70.4	70.3
Yes (%)	29.6	29.7
Total (N)	98	64

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	Male	Female
No (%)	62.2	64.1
Yes (%)	37.8	35.9
Total (N)	98	64

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.2	0.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	1.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.7	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	1.7	3.1
0% of time (%)	96.6	95.9
Total (N)	117	97

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	Male	Female
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.7	5.4
more than 50% of time (%)	2.6	1.0
26% to 50% of time (%)	10.3	7.2
11% to 25% of time (%)	9.4	5.2
6% to 10% of time (%)	5.1	3.1
1% to 5% of time (%)	8.5	7.2
0% of time (%)	64.1	76.3
Total (N)	117	97

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	Male	Female
No (%)	59.8	63.9
Yes (%)	40.2	36.1
Total (N)	117	97

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	Male	Female
No (%)	60.7	69.1
Yes (%)	39.3	30.9
Total (N)	117	97

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	Male	Female
No (%)	79.5	86.6
Yes (%)	20.5	13.4
Total (N)	117	97

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	Male	Female
No (%)	85.5	86.6
Yes (%)	14.5	13.4
Total (N)	117	97

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	Male	Female
No (%)	59.0	67.0
Yes (%)	41.0	33.0
Total (N)	117	97

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	Male	Female
No (%)	66.7	79.4
Yes (%)	33.3	20.6
Total (N)	117	97

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	Male	Female
No (%)	94.0	91.8
Yes (%)	6.0	8.2
Total (N)	117	97

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	21.6	21.1
A few times (%)	47.4	40.0
About once per month (%)	7.8	14.7
Two or three times per month (%)	7.8	7.4
At least once per week (%)	15.5	16.8
Total (N)	116	95

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	Male	Female
Never (%)	63.8	63.8
Once or twice (%)	14.7	24.5
Three to five times (%)	11.2	4.3
Six to ten times (%)	4.3	4.3
More than 10 times (%)	6.0	3.2
Total (N)	116	94

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	Male	Female
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	13.8	9.5
2 (%)	28.4	28.4
3 (%)	28.4	23.2
4 (%)	22.4	32.6
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	6.9	6.3
Total (N)	116	95

M7: Change how you spend your work time	Male	Female
I would change how I spent time (%)	63.2	77.0
I would not change a thing (%)	36.8	23.0
Total (N)	106	87

Back to Top

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	32.2	21.3
3: Satisfied (%)	46.1	43.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.4	27.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	7.4
Total (N)	115	94

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.5	16.8
3: Agree (%)	41.7	46.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.5	21.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.2	15.8
Total (N)	115	95

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.0	63.2
3: Agree (%)	39.1	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	115	95

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.7	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	63.2
3: Agree (%)	25.2	34.7
2: Disagree (%)	2.6	1.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	1.1
Total (N)	115	95

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.2	30.9
3: Agree (%)	33.0	45.7
2: Disagree (%)	12.2	21.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	2.1
Total (N)	115	94

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.2	19.8
3: Agree (%)	53.2	50.5
2: Disagree (%)	11.7	24.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.9	5.5
Total (N)	111	91

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	18.5
3: Agree (%)	55.0	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	8.1	27.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	6.5
Total (N)	111	92

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or tenure	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	21.8	31.5
3: Some (%)	29.7	46.6
2: A little (%)	20.8	6.8
1: None at all (%)	27.7	15.1
Total (N)	101	73

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	18.6	30.4
3: Some (%)	51.0	34.8
2: A little (%)	14.7	17.4
1: None at all (%)	15.7	17.4
Total (N)	102	69

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.2	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	8.3	10.8
3: Some (%)	31.5	32.5
2: A little (%)	28.7	22.9
1: None at all (%)	31.5	33.7
Total (N)	108	83

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: A great deal (%)	24.3	22.2
3: Some (%)	30.8	29.6
2: A little (%)	25.2	32.1
1: None at all (%)	19.6	16.0
Total (N)	107	81

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	19.0	22.5
3: Some (%)	28.6	25.0
2: A little (%)	37.1	17.5
1: None at all (%)	15.2	35.0
Total (N)	105	80

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	1.8	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	.	1.1
3: Some (%)	14.9	20.7
2: A little (%)	46.5	34.8
1: None at all (%)	38.6	43.5
Total (N)	114	92

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	6.1	19.1
3: Some (%)	27.8	20.2
2: A little (%)	33.9	36.2
1: None at all (%)	32.2	24.5
Total (N)	115	94

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	11.4	19.8
3: Some (%)	25.4	27.5
2: A little (%)	24.6	24.2
1: None at all (%)	38.6	28.6
Total (N)	114	91

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.8
4: A great deal (%)	12.2	9.0
3: Some (%)	23.5	12.8
2: A little (%)	23.5	25.6
1: None at all (%)	40.8	52.6
Total (N)	98	78

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	25.2	36.8
3: Some (%)	32.2	36.8
2: A little (%)	27.8	16.8
1: None at all (%)	14.8	9.5
Total (N)	115	95

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	27.2	35.8
3: Some (%)	28.1	35.8
2: A little (%)	26.3	24.2
1: None at all (%)	18.4	4.2
Total (N)	114	95

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	10.6	18.1
3: Some (%)	43.4	41.5
2: A little (%)	32.7	30.9
1: None at all (%)	13.3	9.6
Total (N)	113	94

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	7.1	5.7
3: Some (%)	28.6	17.2
2: A little (%)	33.9	42.5
1: None at all (%)	30.4	34.5
Total (N)	112	87

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.4	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	14.9	7.2
3: Some (%)	33.0	20.3
2: A little (%)	24.5	33.3
1: None at all (%)	27.7	39.1
Total (N)	94	69

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	Male	Female
Mean Rating	2.9	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.0	9.7
3: Satisfied (%)	60.9	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.3	34.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	2.2
Total (N)	115	93

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	Male	Female
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
A lot more satisfied now (%)	10.4	9.5
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	37.4	33.7
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	25.2	23.2
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	20.0	20.0
A lot less satisfied now (%)	7.0	13.7
Total (N)	115	95

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	22.6	18.1
Yes - not very seriously (%)	15.7	7.4
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	29.6	29.8
Yes - very seriously (%)	32.2	44.7
Total (N)	115	94

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	Male	Female
No - never considered leaving (%)	63.2	43.5
Yes - not very seriously (%)	17.5	25.0
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	14.0	21.7
Yes - very seriously (%)	5.3	9.8
Total (N)	114	92

Back to top

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

Return to CHASS Results Index

Return to 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey Table of Contents Page