North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
by Race/Ethnicity 1

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

To download a Microsoft Word version of this document, click here.

A2: Ever held an administrative position	White	Faculty of Color
..... No (%)	73.9	95.8
..... Yes (%)	26.1	4.2
Total (N)	257	24

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.5	33.3
3: Agree (%)	49.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	13.1	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	252	24

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.8	41.7
3: Agree (%)	49.2	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	20.2	20.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.8	.
Total (N)	252	24

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.1	42.9
3: Agree (%)	52.6	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.8	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.
Total (N)	247	21

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.9	4.1
5: Very strong (%)	28.0	35.0
4: Strong (%)	37.4	45.0
3: Average (%)	27.6	15.0
2: Weak (%)	5.6	5.0
1: Very weak (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	214	20

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.1	4.1
5: Very strong (%)	39.8	33.3
4: Strong (%)	38.1	45.8
3: Average (%)	16.0	20.8
2: Weak (%)	4.9	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	244	24

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	43.3	37.5
4: Strong (%)	35.3	54.2
3: Average (%)	17.5	8.3
2: Weak (%)	3.6	.
1: Very weak (%)	0.4	.
Total (N)	252	24

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	15.8	27.3
4: Strong (%)	38.2	72.7
3: Average (%)	30.3	.
2: Weak (%)	14.5	.
1: Very weak (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	76	11

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.8
5: Very strong (%)	12.9	18.8
4: Strong (%)	40.6	37.5
3: Average (%)	37.6	43.8
2: Weak (%)	8.2	.
1: Very weak (%)	0.6	.
Total (N)	170	16

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.3
5: Very strong (%)	46.1	47.6
4: Strong (%)	35.1	33.3
3: Average (%)	16.2	19.0
2: Weak (%)	2.2	.
1: Very weak (%)	0.4	.
Total (N)	228	21

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	4.1
5: Very strong (%)	17.7	26.3
4: Strong (%)	47.3	52.6
3: Average (%)	29.6	21.1
2: Weak (%)	4.9	.
1: Very weak (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	203	19

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.9	4.2
A (%)	20.2	30.0
B (%)	58.1	55.0
C (%)	16.7	15.0
D (%)	2.5	.
F (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	198	20

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.2	4.4
A (%)	38.7	47.8
B (%)	48.4	47.8
C (%)	10.1	4.3
D (%)	1.6	.
F (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	248	23

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.5	4.7
A (%)	57.1	66.7
B (%)	35.4	33.3
C (%)	7.1	.
D (%)	0.4	.
Total (N)	254	24

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.4	4.5
A (%)	51.2	58.3
B (%)	40.9	37.5
C (%)	6.7	4.2
D (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	252	24

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.5	4.6
A (%)	53.6	58.3
B (%)	44.0	41.7
C (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	252	24

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	4.5	4.5
A (%)	51.8	50.0
B (%)	41.5	50.0
C (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	253	24

B4: Department's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	30.6	54.2
Vision with slow progress (%)	41.3	29.2
No clear vision (%)	25.4	16.7
Not familiar (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	252	24

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.6	50.0
3: Agree (%)	57.3	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.6	.
Total (N)	178	20

B6: College's vision for the future	White	Faculty of Color
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	16.1	41.7
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.9	33.3
No clear vision (%)	35.0	16.7
Not familiar (%)	15.0	8.3
Total (N)	254	24

B7a: Department change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	56.5	79.2
Change for the worse (%)	16.6	4.2
Not really change (%)	26.9	16.7
Total (N)	253	24

B7b: College change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	29.8	66.7
Change for the worse (%)	19.0	.
Not really change (%)	51.2	33.3
Total (N)	252	24

B7c: NC State change in next five years	White	Faculty of Color
Change for the better (%)	39.0	62.5
Change for the worse (%)	14.3	.
Not really change (%)	46.6	37.5
Total (N)	251	24

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	37.0	47.8
3: Good (%)	43.5	34.8
2: Fair (%)	14.2	17.4
1: Poor (%)	5.3	.
Total (N)	246	23

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	44.1	54.5
3: Good (%)	34.5	31.8
2: Fair (%)	13.9	13.6
1: Poor (%)	7.6	.
Total (N)	238	22

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	37.9	40.9
3: Good (%)	40.8	50.0
2: Fair (%)	13.3	9.1
1: Poor (%)	7.9	.
Total (N)	240	22

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	31.1	38.1
3: Good (%)	46.2	52.4
2: Fair (%)	18.5	9.5
1: Poor (%)	4.2	.
Total (N)	238	21

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.6
4: Excellent (%)	53.0	61.9
3: Good (%)	38.9	33.3
2: Fair (%)	4.5	4.8
1: Poor (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	247	21

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	22.0	40.9
3: Good (%)	38.1	45.5
2: Fair (%)	28.0	9.1
1: Poor (%)	11.9	4.5
Total (N)	236	22

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	39.7	65.2
3: Good (%)	38.8	26.1
2: Fair (%)	14.9	4.3
1: Poor (%)	6.6	4.3
Total (N)	242	23

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	33.3
3: Good (%)	43.4	52.4
2: Fair (%)	21.2	4.8
1: Poor (%)	10.4	9.5
Total (N)	212	21

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	17.5	27.3
3: Good (%)	39.4	45.5
2: Fair (%)	24.8	22.7
1: Poor (%)	18.3	4.5
Total (N)	246	22

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	27.6	35.0
3: Good (%)	43.0	45.0
2: Fair (%)	20.2	10.0
1: Poor (%)	9.2	10.0
Total (N)	228	20

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	43.6	57.1
3: Good (%)	33.1	28.6
2: Fair (%)	16.5	14.3
1: Poor (%)	6.8	.
Total (N)	236	21

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	57.3	52.4
3: Good (%)	35.9	38.1
2: Fair (%)	4.7	9.5
1: Poor (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	234	21

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	40.2	47.6
3: Good (%)	41.4	38.1
2: Fair (%)	12.7	9.5
1: Poor (%)	5.7	4.8
Total (N)	244	21

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	39.0	45.0
3: Good (%)	39.4	40.0
2: Fair (%)	14.0	5.0
1: Poor (%)	7.6	10.0
Total (N)	236	20

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	43.6	57.1
3: Good (%)	35.1	28.6
2: Fair (%)	15.6	4.8
1: Poor (%)	5.8	9.5
Total (N)	225	21

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.2	20.0
3: Good (%)	39.7	55.0
2: Fair (%)	37.6	10.0
1: Poor (%)	16.5	15.0
Total (N)	242	20

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	4.4	15.0
3: Good (%)	24.2	45.0
2: Fair (%)	41.0	20.0
1: Poor (%)	30.4	20.0
Total (N)	227	20

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	5.0	15.8
3: Good (%)	23.9	47.4
2: Fair (%)	43.3	10.5
1: Poor (%)	27.9	26.3
Total (N)	201	19

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	19.7	28.6
3: Good (%)	44.0	42.9
2: Fair (%)	21.4	4.8
1: Poor (%)	15.0	23.8
Total (N)	234	21

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	5.9	30.0
3: Good (%)	30.9	35.0
2: Fair (%)	37.7	10.0
1: Poor (%)	25.5	25.0
Total (N)	220	20

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	17.6	36.8
3: Good (%)	37.4	31.6
2: Fair (%)	25.6	26.3
1: Poor (%)	19.4	5.3
Total (N)	227	19

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	5.2	13.3
3: Good (%)	33.5	40.0
2: Fair (%)	36.1	20.0
1: Poor (%)	25.2	26.7
Total (N)	155	15

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	6.1	33.3
3: Good (%)	30.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	32.5	14.3
1: Poor (%)	30.9	19.0
Total (N)	246	21

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	3.8	11.8
3: Good (%)	31.3	64.7
2: Fair (%)	31.3	11.8
1: Poor (%)	33.7	11.8
Total (N)	208	17

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	23.9	41.2
3: Good (%)	46.8	41.2
2: Fair (%)	21.4	11.8
1: Poor (%)	8.0	5.9
Total (N)	201	17

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	34.4	50.0
3: Good (%)	52.7	22.2
2: Fair (%)	8.9	16.7
1: Poor (%)	4.0	11.1
Total (N)	224	18

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	10.2	30.0
3: Good (%)	46.3	40.0
2: Fair (%)	27.8	20.0
1: Poor (%)	15.7	10.0
Total (N)	216	20

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	7.5	27.8
3: Good (%)	43.3	38.9
2: Fair (%)	30.3	16.7
1: Poor (%)	18.9	16.7
Total (N)	201	18

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	33.2	38.9
3: Good (%)	43.3	33.3
2: Fair (%)	14.9	11.1
1: Poor (%)	8.7	16.7
Total (N)	208	18

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	6.0	5.3
3: Good (%)	34.5	42.1
2: Fair (%)	43.0	42.1
1: Poor (%)	16.6	10.5
Total (N)	235	19

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	5.1	14.3
3: Good (%)	29.3	28.6
2: Fair (%)	38.9	42.9
1: Poor (%)	26.8	14.3
Total (N)	157	14

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	7.4	17.6
3: Good (%)	50.0	41.2
2: Fair (%)	29.2	29.4
1: Poor (%)	13.4	11.8
Total (N)	216	17

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	30.6	31.3
3: Good (%)	47.4	37.5
2: Fair (%)	13.3	25.0
1: Poor (%)	8.7	6.3
Total (N)	196	16

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	35.6	38.9
3: Good (%)	51.6	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.6	16.7
1: Poor (%)	3.2	11.1
Total (N)	219	18

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	13.5	16.7
3: Good (%)	51.6	44.4
2: Fair (%)	26.0	22.2
1: Poor (%)	8.9	16.7
Total (N)	192	18

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	13.0	14.3
3: Good (%)	45.2	42.9
2: Fair (%)	28.2	21.4
1: Poor (%)	13.6	21.4
Total (N)	177	14

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	34.3	29.4
3: Good (%)	47.8	35.3
2: Fair (%)	13.5	11.8
1: Poor (%)	4.3	23.5
Total (N)	207	17

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.0	47.8
3: Agree (%)	39.6	47.8
2: Disagree (%)	6.4	4.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.0	.
Total (N)	250	23

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.1	40.9
3: Agree (%)	44.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	12.9	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	248	22

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.7	50.0
3: Agree (%)	37.2	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	6.9	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	247	22

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.2	27.3
3: Agree (%)	42.5	40.9
2: Disagree (%)	34.0	22.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.3	9.1
Total (N)	247	22

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.5	14.3
3: Agree (%)	37.4	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	41.5	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.6	4.8
Total (N)	246	21

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very familiar (%)	40.2	34.8
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	36.9	39.1
2: Not very familiar (%)	19.3	8.7
1: Not at all familiar (%)	3.6	17.4
Total (N)	249	23

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Very well (%)	6.4	.
3: Fairly well (%)	32.3	18.2
2: Not very well (%)	49.0	59.1
1: Not at all (%)	12.4	22.7
Total (N)	251	22

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.0
4: Very well (%)	5.2	.
3: Fairly well (%)	33.6	17.4
2: Not very well (%)	52.0	60.9
1: Not at all (%)	9.2	21.7
Total (N)	250	23

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very well (%)	14.3	.
3: Fairly well (%)	39.8	52.2
2: Not very well (%)	40.2	34.8
1: Not at all (%)	5.6	13.0
Total (N)	251	23

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Very well (%)	30.3	13.6
3: Fairly well (%)	43.0	54.5
2: Not very well (%)	23.1	18.2
1: Not at all (%)	3.6	13.6
Total (N)	251	22

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.9	8.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	27.8	34.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.3	4.3
Total (N)	248	23

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.0	47.8
3: Agree (%)	38.6	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	7.2	8.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	4.3
Total (N)	251	23

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	42.8	40.9
3: Good (%)	40.3	45.5
2: Fair (%)	14.0	9.1
1: Poor (%)	2.9	4.5
Total (N)	243	22

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	17.0	17.4
3: Good (%)	46.0	56.5
2: Fair (%)	25.1	8.7
1: Poor (%)	11.9	17.4
Total (N)	235	23

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	13.5	10.0
3: Good (%)	47.6	60.0
2: Fair (%)	29.2	15.0
1: Poor (%)	9.7	15.0
Total (N)	185	20

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	9.5	5.3
3: Good (%)	46.9	52.6
2: Fair (%)	36.9	31.6
1: Poor (%)	6.7	10.5
Total (N)	179	19

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	.
3: Agree (%)	54.0	69.2
2: Disagree (%)	23.5	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.4	7.7
Total (N)	187	13

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.5	8.3
3: Agree (%)	53.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	23.2	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.3	16.7
Total (N)	181	12

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	7.4	9.1
3: Agree (%)	46.3	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.7	18.2
Total (N)	175	11

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Very effective (%)	18.4	.
3: Somewhat effective (%)	50.6	71.4
2: Not very effective (%)	23.0	28.6
1: Not at all effective (%)	8.0	.
Total (N)	87	7

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
4: Very important (%)	46.0	45.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	45.2	54.5
2: Not very important (%)	7.7	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	248	22

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.7
4: Very important (%)	43.6	72.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	43.6	22.7
2: Not very important (%)	11.6	4.5
1: Not at all important (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	250	22

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.5
4: Very important (%)	23.8	63.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	41.3	26.3
2: Not very important (%)	26.5	5.3
1: Not at all important (%)	8.5	5.3
Total (N)	223	19

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	15.8
3: Agree (%)	68.9	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	15.5	26.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	206	19

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.8	21.1
3: Agree (%)	51.9	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	17.5	15.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.8	10.5
Total (N)	206	19

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	29.4
3: Agree (%)	53.1	47.1
2: Disagree (%)	14.9	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	5.9
Total (N)	194	17

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.1	27.8
3: Agree (%)	57.1	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.7	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	5.6
Total (N)	196	18

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.4	16.7
3: Agree (%)	49.1	61.1
2: Disagree (%)	24.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.2	11.1
Total (N)	218	18

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	21.4
3: Agree (%)	52.1	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.5	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	7.1
Total (N)	194	14

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.8	25.0
3: Agree (%)	52.3	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	6.3
Total (N)	195	16

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.5	42.9
3: Agree (%)	41.5	52.4
2: Disagree (%)	2.8	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	246	21

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	51.5	40.0
3: Agree (%)	44.8	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.5	.
Total (N)	194	15

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.3	47.6
3: Agree (%)	41.1	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	4.9	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	4.8
Total (N)	246	21

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.8	35.7
3: Agree (%)	44.9	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	156	14

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.4	40.9
3: Agree (%)	42.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.4	4.5
Total (N)	237	22

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	52.5	40.9
3: Agree (%)	44.6	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.5	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.4	4.5
Total (N)	240	22

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.5	40.0
3: Agree (%)	45.2	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	6.0	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.3	5.0
Total (N)	217	20

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	26.7
3: Agree (%)	42.9	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	6.0	6.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.2	.
Total (N)	168	15

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.6	66.7
3: Agree (%)	31.7	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	2.9	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	243	21

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.3	63.2
3: Agree (%)	34.3	36.8
2: Disagree (%)	1.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	210	19

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.7	63.6
3: Agree (%)	32.8	36.4
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	241	22

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.6	61.1
3: Agree (%)	33.7	38.9
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	.
Total (N)	178	18

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	63.4	61.9
3: Agree (%)	32.8	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.0	4.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	235	21

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	64.4	63.6
3: Agree (%)	33.5	31.8
2: Disagree (%)	1.7	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.4	.
Total (N)	236	22

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	59.3	61.9
3: Agree (%)	33.6	28.6
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.8	.
Total (N)	226	21

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.7	61.1
3: Agree (%)	32.6	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	178	18

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	16.0	33.3
3: Some (%)	42.9	38.1
2: A little (%)	26.1	14.3
1: Not at all (%)	15.1	14.3
Total (N)	238	21

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.0	11.8
3: Some (%)	29.6	35.3
2: A little (%)	21.2	23.5
1: Not at all (%)	40.2	29.4
Total (N)	189	17

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.5
4: A great deal (%)	40.9	63.6
3: Some (%)	34.4	27.3
2: A little (%)	15.0	9.1
1: None (%)	9.7	.
Total (N)	247	22

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	18.8	22.7
3: Some (%)	26.5	31.8
2: A little (%)	20.4	18.2
1: None (%)	34.3	27.3
Total (N)	245	22

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	8.5	4.8
3: Some (%)	21.1	28.6
2: A little (%)	19.8	23.8
1: None (%)	50.6	42.9
Total (N)	247	21

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	16.2	36.4
3: Some (%)	31.6	36.4
2: A little (%)	26.3	13.6
1: None (%)	25.9	13.6
Total (N)	247	22

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.7	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	5.7	4.5
3: Some (%)	15.9	27.3
2: A little (%)	16.3	36.4
1: None (%)	62.0	31.8
Total (N)	245	22

E9f: Interest in advising international students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.2
4: A great deal (%)	25.1	65.0
3: Some (%)	38.9	5.0
2: A little (%)	15.8	15.0
1: None (%)	20.2	15.0
Total (N)	247	20

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.0	33.3
3: Agree (%)	46.8	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	9.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.2	14.3
Total (N)	250	21

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	53.9	65.0
3: Agree (%)	45.2	35.0
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	230	20

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.3	35.0
3: Agree (%)	61.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0
Total (N)	239	20

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.7	25.0
3: Agree (%)	53.8	65.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.1	5.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.4	5.0
Total (N)	249	20

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.1	5.9
3: Agree (%)	55.7	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	25.8	35.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.4	5.9
Total (N)	221	17

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.8	.
3: Agree (%)	52.4	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	32.7	36.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.2	.
Total (N)	147	11

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.1	42.1
3: Agree (%)	52.0	42.1
2: Disagree (%)	9.4	10.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	5.3
Total (N)	244	19

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
Frequently (%)	26.7	23.8
Sometimes (%)	47.4	52.4
Seldom (%)	13.4	4.8
Never (%)	12.6	19.0
Total (N)	247	21

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
Frequently (%)	48.8	33.3
Sometimes (%)	39.5	61.9
Seldom (%)	7.7	4.8
Never (%)	4.0	.
Total (N)	248	21

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
Frequently (%)	35.5	20.0
Sometimes (%)	41.9	55.0
Seldom (%)	17.7	20.0
Never (%)	4.8	5.0
Total (N)	248	20

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
Frequently (%)	39.5	30.0
Sometimes (%)	44.0	50.0
Seldom (%)	12.1	15.0
Never (%)	4.4	5.0
Total (N)	248	20

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.4
Frequently (%)	11.4	5.0
Sometimes (%)	28.9	45.0
Seldom (%)	30.1	35.0
Never (%)	29.7	15.0
Total (N)	246	20

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9
Frequently (%)	75.4	85.7
Sometimes (%)	20.2	14.3
Seldom (%)	2.0	.
Never (%)	2.4	.
Total (N)	248	21

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.5
Frequently (%)	54.7	57.1
Sometimes (%)	30.4	33.3
Seldom (%)	11.7	9.5
Never (%)	3.2	.
Total (N)	247	21

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
Frequently (%)	45.6	42.9
Sometimes (%)	35.9	47.6
Seldom (%)	11.7	4.8
Never (%)	6.9	4.8
Total (N)	248	21

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
Frequently (%)	40.9	28.6
Sometimes (%)	28.7	38.1
Seldom (%)	17.8	19.0
Never (%)	12.6	14.3
Total (N)	247	21

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	48.4	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	48.4	53.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.6	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.5	.
Total (N)	190	15

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.9	40.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.3	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	193	15

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	58.6	66.7
3: Satisfied (%)	36.1	26.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.7	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	191	15

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	78.1	64.3
3: Satisfied (%)	19.8	28.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	2.1	7.1
Total (N)	192	14

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	40.4	42.9
3: Satisfied (%)	50.8	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.0	.
Total (N)	193	14

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.9	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	60.1	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.6	8.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.4	.
Total (N)	168	12

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.0	56.3
3: Satisfied (%)	65.3	37.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.3	6.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	219	16

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.9	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	63.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.0	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.3	.
Total (N)	162	11

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.7	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	50.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.5	6.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.0	6.7
Total (N)	191	15

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.2	35.3
3: Agree (%)	59.1	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	4.0	11.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.7	.
Total (N)	225	17

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.9	40.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	45.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.8	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.3	.
Total (N)	240	20

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	50.0
3: Agree (%)	50.9	37.5
2: Disagree (%)	8.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	57	8

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.9	53.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	5.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	198	15

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.6	14.3
3: Agree (%)	53.7	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	19.0	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.7	.
Total (N)	216	14

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.3	46.7
3: Agree (%)	47.2	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	9.9	13.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	233	15

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	42.9
3: Agree (%)	58.0	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	12.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	.
Total (N)	50	7

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.7	30.8
3: Agree (%)	51.7	53.8
2: Disagree (%)	18.3	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	.
Total (N)	180	13

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.8	30.8
3: Satisfied (%)	57.7	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.6	7.7
Total (N)	194	13

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.5	.
3: Satisfied (%)	58.0	100.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.2	.
Total (N)	131	11

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	19.9	30.8
3: Satisfied (%)	75.3	61.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.8	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.1	.
Total (N)	186	13

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.6	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	41.2	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.5	42.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.8	.
Total (N)	136	7

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.7	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	63.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.8	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.0	.
Total (N)	181	12

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	70.9	81.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.8	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.7	.
Total (N)	148	11

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.9	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	38.1	35.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.0	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.0	7.1
Total (N)	226	14

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.0	30.0
3: Satisfied (%)	55.7	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.6	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.
Total (N)	194	10

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.0	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	39.4	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.4	30.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.1	.
Total (N)	175	10

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.2	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	68.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.0	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.7	.
Total (N)	169	12

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.8	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	57.4	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	24.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.9	8.3
Total (N)	169	12

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.3	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	56.4	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	5.4	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	241	18

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.3	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.4	73.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.2	6.7
Total (N)	169	15

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	8.5	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	60.6	84.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.1	7.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.7	.
Total (N)	188	13

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	White	Faculty of Color
Yes (%)	32.0	71.4
No (%)	67.6	23.8
Don't know (%)	0.4	4.8
Total (N)	247	21

G6: Mentor helpfulness	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.5
4: Very helpful (%)	46.8	66.7
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	30.4	20.0
2: Not very helpful (%)	20.3	6.7
1: Not at all helpful (%)	2.5	6.7
Total (N)	79	15

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.2	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	58.0	47.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.3	21.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.5	15.8
Total (N)	212	19

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	59.6	43.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.1	31.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.6	12.5
Total (N)	208	16

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	26.7
3: Satisfied (%)	58.0	46.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.9	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	12.7	6.7
Total (N)	181	15

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	56.1	53.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.8	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	15.6	7.7
Total (N)	180	13

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	1.6	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	37.8	23.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.2	30.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.4	38.5
Total (N)	193	13

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	2.8	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	36.7	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.8	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	22.8	33.3
Total (N)	180	12

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	2.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.7	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	22.5	21.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	38.5	35.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	35.3	35.7
Total (N)	187	14

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	29.1	35.0
3: Agree (%)	43.0	40.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.5	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	237	20

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	34.7	36.8
3: Agree (%)	51.0	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	11.7	10.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	239	19

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.8	55.6
3: Agree (%)	57.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.1	.
Total (N)	228	18

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.2	50.0
3: Agree (%)	48.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	8.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	1.4	.
Total (N)	211	16

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.9	41.2
3: Agree (%)	41.9	52.9
2: Disagree (%)	17.5	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	5.9
Total (N)	217	17

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.2	44.4
3: Agree (%)	46.1	38.9
2: Disagree (%)	23.3	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.4	5.6
Total (N)	232	18

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.2	38.9
3: Agree (%)	48.7	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	10.8	11.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.
Total (N)	232	18

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	41.2
3: Agree (%)	39.4	23.5
2: Disagree (%)	35.1	29.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	5.9
Total (N)	231	17

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.8	35.3
3: Agree (%)	48.2	41.2
2: Disagree (%)	18.4	23.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.6	.
Total (N)	228	17

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Very well (%)	25.0	20.0
3: Fairly well (%)	48.0	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	21.3	20.0
1: Not at all (%)	5.7	10.0
Total (N)	244	20

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	30.8	40.0
Yes (%)	69.2	60.0
Total (N)	247	20

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	27.5	65.0
Yes (%)	72.5	35.0
Total (N)	247	20

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	55.5	85.0
Yes (%)	44.5	15.0
Total (N)	247	20

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	86.2	60.0
Yes (%)	13.8	40.0
Total (N)	247	20

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Very well (%)	42.0	30.0
3: Fairly well (%)	43.6	50.0
2: Not very well (%)	11.5	15.0
1: Not at all (%)	2.9	5.0
Total (N)	243	20

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Very well (%)	48.6	36.8
3: Fairly well (%)	39.9	36.8
2: Not very well (%)	8.6	21.1
1: Not at all (%)	2.9	5.3
Total (N)	243	19

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.7	40.0
3: Agree (%)	40.3	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	14.7	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.
Total (N)	211	10

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.1	36.4
3: Agree (%)	47.0	45.5
2: Disagree (%)	4.2	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.7	9.1
Total (N)	215	11

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.6	26.7
3: Agree (%)	55.1	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	27.1	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	6.7
Total (N)	207	15

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.2	26.7
3: Agree (%)	54.1	46.7
2: Disagree (%)	29.3	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	6.7
Total (N)	205	15

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.4	42.9
3: Agree (%)	61.4	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.
Total (N)	44	7

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.4	30.8
3: Agree (%)	58.0	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	23.9	23.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	7.7
Total (N)	138	13

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.6	28.6
3: Agree (%)	49.7	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	21.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.7	7.1
Total (N)	175	14

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.4	26.7
3: Agree (%)	52.6	26.7
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.0	13.3
Total (N)	211	15

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.5	.
3: Agree (%)	53.7	76.5
2: Disagree (%)	16.2	17.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.6	5.9
Total (N)	216	17

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	35.9	11.1
3: Agree (%)	48.6	83.3
2: Disagree (%)	11.8	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	220	18

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	.
3: Agree (%)	52.2	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	.
Total (N)	46	8

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.7	7.1
3: Agree (%)	56.1	78.6
2: Disagree (%)	16.5	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	139	14

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.1	11.8
3: Agree (%)	59.4	82.4
2: Disagree (%)	9.9	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	.
Total (N)	192	17

H13f: Department rewards professional service	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	15.0	13.3
3: Agree (%)	60.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	19.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	6.7
Total (N)	220	15

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	White	Faculty of Color
Has experience (%)	71.5	20.0
No experience (%)	28.5	80.0
Total (N)	235	20

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	39.6	80.0
Yes (%)	60.4	20.0
Total (N)	235	20

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	57.4	95.0
Yes (%)	42.6	5.0
Total (N)	235	20

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	90.6	100.0
Yes (%)	9.4	.
Total (N)	235	20

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	97.4	100.0
Yes (%)	2.6	.
Total (N)	235	20

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.7	9.1
3: Agree (%)	63.2	72.7
2: Disagree (%)	14.0	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.1	9.1
Total (N)	171	11

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.2	16.7
3: Agree (%)	55.2	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	24.5	8.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.1	16.7
Total (N)	192	12

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.0	16.7
3: Agree (%)	59.7	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	15.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.1	8.3
Total (N)	191	12

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.9	15.4
3: Agree (%)	52.9	61.5
2: Disagree (%)	24.6	7.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.6	15.4
Total (N)	191	13

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.7	.
3: Agree (%)	61.7	88.9
2: Disagree (%)	6.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.0	11.1
Total (N)	167	9

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.9	.
3: Agree (%)	59.6	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	7.8	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	14.3
Total (N)	166	7

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	19.4	12.5
3: Agree (%)	56.1	75.0
2: Disagree (%)	17.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	12.5
Total (N)	155	8

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.8	28.6
3: Satisfied (%)	61.3	42.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.5	28.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.5	.
Total (N)	173	7

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.5	7.1
3: Agree (%)	46.6	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	23.6	7.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.4	14.3
Total (N)	191	14

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.7	9.1
3: Agree (%)	46.7	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	25.5	18.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	15.2	9.1
Total (N)	165	11

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.1	10.0
3: Agree (%)	36.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	36.5	20.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	17.0	10.0
Total (N)	159	10

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.
3: Agree (%)	34.9	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	37.6	22.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.8	33.3
Total (N)	149	9

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.
3: Agree (%)	23.5	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	40.8	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	29.1	16.7
Total (N)	179	12

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.3
4: Very well (%)	20.8	.
3: Fairly well (%)	36.7	45.0
2: Not very well (%)	24.5	35.0
1: Not at all (%)	18.0	20.0
Total (N)	245	20

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.9	11.8
3: Agree (%)	53.5	70.6
2: Disagree (%)	16.8	11.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.8	5.9
Total (N)	226	17

J4: I have access to benefits information	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.6	36.8
3: Agree (%)	55.4	63.2
2: Disagree (%)	6.2	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	242	19

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	4.2	.
3: Agree (%)	18.5	31.6
2: Disagree (%)	30.6	52.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	46.8	15.8
Total (N)	216	19

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.6	.
3: Agree (%)	40.6	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	25.9	28.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	24.9	14.3
Total (N)	197	14

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.1	12.5
3: Agree (%)	54.3	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	25.6	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.0	12.5
Total (N)	164	8

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.7	5.3
3: Agree (%)	49.0	63.2
2: Disagree (%)	35.5	31.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.8	.
Total (N)	245	19

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.7	26.3
3: Agree (%)	59.1	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	13.2	10.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	5.3
Total (N)	242	19

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	13.2	20.0
3: Agree (%)	59.5	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	20.2	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.0	5.0
Total (N)	242	20

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Very important (%)	70.1	65.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	25.8	35.0
2: Not very important (%)	3.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	244	20

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.7
4: Very important (%)	73.1	70.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	22.9	30.0
2: Not very important (%)	2.4	.
1: Not at all important (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	245	20

J11c: Importance of family leave time	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.8
4: Very important (%)	71.3	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	27.0	25.0
2: Not very important (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	244	20

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.7	3.9
4: Very important (%)	71.8	85.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	24.5	15.0
2: Not very important (%)	3.3	.
1: Not at all important (%)	0.4	.
Total (N)	245	20

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.7
4: Very important (%)	58.4	75.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	32.1	20.0
2: Not very important (%)	7.0	5.0
1: Not at all important (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	243	20

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Very important (%)	70.5	73.7
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.3	21.1
2: Not very important (%)	6.6	5.3
1: Not at all important (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	244	19

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.8	15.8
3: Agree (%)	36.5	57.9
2: Disagree (%)	29.5	10.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	19.3	15.8
Total (N)	244	19

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.9	10.5
3: Agree (%)	42.8	52.6
2: Disagree (%)	27.2	36.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	13.2	.
Total (N)	243	19

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	8.7	5.6
3: Agree (%)	52.1	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	31.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	5.6
Total (N)	242	18

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	38.0	21.1
3: Satisfied (%)	43.4	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.0	5.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.6	10.5
Total (N)	242	19

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	22.5	27.8
3: Satisfied (%)	50.6	38.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.2	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	11.1
Total (N)	178	18

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.3	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.8	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	.
Total (N)	197	14

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.7	18.2
3: Satisfied (%)	43.0	54.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.2	18.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.2	9.1
Total (N)	114	11

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.8	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	39.5	36.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.0	21.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.8	26.3
Total (N)	243	19

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.9	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	29.8	31.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.0	21.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	29.3	31.6
Total (N)	242	19

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.6	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	53.3	47.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.4	26.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.7	21.1
Total (N)	240	19

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.1	15.8
3: Satisfied (%)	53.7	63.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	19.7	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	13.5	10.5
Total (N)	244	19

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.9	21.1
3: Satisfied (%)	52.8	57.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	20.9	15.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.5	5.3
Total (N)	235	19

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.1	7.7
3: Satisfied (%)	47.1	15.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.1	69.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	19.8	7.7
Total (N)	172	13

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.5	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	44.1	44.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	23.7	16.7
Total (N)	236	18

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.0	.
3: Satisfied (%)	26.4	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	38.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	34.9	27.8
Total (N)	235	18

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.6	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	65.2	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.3	50.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.9	.
Total (N)	92	4

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.1	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	38.6	45.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	37.8	27.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.5	18.2
Total (N)	127	11

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.6	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	56.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.4	31.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.2	6.3
Total (N)	219	16

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.4	5.9
3: Satisfied (%)	47.9	58.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.8	23.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	16.0	11.8
Total (N)	238	17

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.9	6.7
3: Satisfied (%)	68.5	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.4	13.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.2	13.3
Total (N)	238	15

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.3	5.9
3: Satisfied (%)	44.6	52.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	23.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.8	17.6
Total (N)	240	17

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.3	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	51.6	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.5	38.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.6	.
Total (N)	186	18

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.5	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	56.3	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.7	.
Total (N)	176	16

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.0	22.2
3: Satisfied (%)	72.7	61.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.8	.
Total (N)	216	18

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	4.6	6.3
3: Satisfied (%)	56.4	56.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	27.2	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	11.8	.
Total (N)	195	16

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.0	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	52.3	64.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.6	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.1	7.1
Total (N)	128	14

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.4	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	63.0	81.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	21.3	9.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.3	.
Total (N)	127	11

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: A lot (%)	28.9	31.6
3: Some (%)	25.6	10.5
2: A little (%)	20.7	31.6
1: None at all (%)	24.8	26.3
Total (N)	242	19

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6
4: Very likely (%)	31.0	36.8
3: Somewhat likely (%)	33.1	15.8
2: Not very likely (%)	22.3	21.1
1: Not at all likely (%)	13.6	26.3
Total (N)	242	19

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.5	5.6
3: Satisfied (%)	74.6	72.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	11.3	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.7	5.6
Total (N)	240	18

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.4	.
3: Satisfied (%)	76.0	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.8	27.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.7	5.6
Total (N)	242	18

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.2	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	60.6	69.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.8	7.7
Total (N)	165	13

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.1	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	65.8	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.5	25.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.5	12.5
Total (N)	161	8

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.7	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	76.7	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	1.9	16.7
Total (N)	103	6

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.7	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	72.1	62.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.0	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	12.5
Total (N)	140	8

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	12.3	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	65.6	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.7	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.4	.
Total (N)	163	7

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
Once a week or more (%)	25.8	15.8
A few times a month (%)	11.1	5.3
A few times a semester (%)	10.2	36.8
Once a semester (%)	4.5	.
Once a year (%)	5.7	10.5
Never (%)	42.6	31.6
Total (N)	244	19

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
Once a week or more (%)	6.6	11.1
A few times a month (%)	8.7	.
A few times a semester (%)	17.4	22.2
Once a semester (%)	7.9	5.6
Once a year (%)	8.7	5.6
Never (%)	50.6	55.6
Total (N)	241	18

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.6	1.8
Once a week or more (%)	1.6	5.3
A few times a month (%)	4.5	5.3
A few times a semester (%)	6.6	10.5
Once a semester (%)	3.7	.
Once a year (%)	6.2	.
Never (%)	77.4	78.9
Total (N)	243	19

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3
Once a week or more (%)	0.4	.
A few times a month (%)	2.5	10.5
A few times a semester (%)	17.7	15.8
Once a semester (%)	21.4	10.5
Once a year (%)	18.1	15.8
Never (%)	39.9	47.4
Total (N)	243	19

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.1
Once a week or more (%)	2.9	.
A few times a month (%)	9.5	.
A few times a semester (%)	21.0	22.2
Once a semester (%)	13.2	11.1
Once a year (%)	14.8	16.7
Never (%)	38.7	50.0
Total (N)	243	18

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.2	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	18.9	42.1
3: Some (%)	25.0	10.5
2: A little (%)	15.6	21.1
1: None at all (%)	40.6	26.3
Total (N)	244	19

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.8	2.2
4: Very likely (%)	9.0	21.1
3: Somewhat likely (%)	16.0	15.8
2: Not very likely (%)	18.4	26.3
1: Not at all likely (%)	56.6	36.8
Total (N)	244	19

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	White	Faculty of Color
Mean # Hrs Work	55.8	52.8
more than 60 hrs (%)	17.7	10.5
51 to 60 hrs (%)	42.6	36.8
41 to 50 hrs (%)	35.4	47.4
40 hrs or less (%)	4.2	5.3
Total (N)	237	19

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	27.2	19.0
more than 50% of time (%)	12.8	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	28.0	26.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	25.1	36.8
6% to 10% of time (%)	16.5	10.5
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.1	10.5
0% of time (%)	6.6	15.8
Total (N)	243	19

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	25.6	31.3
Yes (%)	74.4	68.8
Total (N)	227	16

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	63.0	50.0
Yes (%)	37.0	50.0
Total (N)	227	16

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	26.0	18.8
Yes (%)	74.0	81.3
Total (N)	227	16

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	70.0	37.5
Yes (%)	30.0	62.5
Total (N)	227	16

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	19.4	25.0
Yes (%)	80.6	75.0
Total (N)	227	16

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	5.5	6.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	1.2	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	8.2	21.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	17.3	26.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	42.8	26.3
0% of time (%)	30.5	26.3
Total (N)	243	19

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	26.6	42.9
Yes (%)	73.4	57.1
Total (N)	169	14

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	31.4	50.0
Yes (%)	68.6	50.0
Total (N)	169	14

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	33.3	50.3
more than 50% of time (%)	21.0	47.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	35.0	36.8
11% to 25% of time (%)	22.6	10.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.0	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	5.3	.
0% of time (%)	9.1	5.3
Total (N)	243	19

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.7	0.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.8	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	0.4	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.6	5.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	2.9	.
0% of time (%)	94.2	94.7
Total (N)	243	19

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	17.3	10.6
more than 50% of time (%)	11.9	5.3
26% to 50% of time (%)	14.4	5.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.8	10.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	7.8	5.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	16.5	26.3
0% of time (%)	41.6	47.4
Total (N)	243	19

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	75.4	80.0
Yes (%)	24.6	20.0
Total (N)	142	10

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	34.5	70.0
Yes (%)	65.5	30.0
Total (N)	142	10

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	69.0	70.0
Yes (%)	31.0	30.0
Total (N)	142	10

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	75.4	80.0
Yes (%)	24.6	20.0
Total (N)	142	10

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	64.8	70.0
Yes (%)	35.2	30.0
Total (N)	142	10

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.6	3.8
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.8	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	14.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	28.4	15.8
1% to 5% of time (%)	43.6	52.6
0% of time (%)	13.2	31.6
Total (N)	243	19

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	78.2	84.6
Yes (%)	21.8	15.4
Total (N)	211	13

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	18.0	15.4
Yes (%)	82.0	84.6
Total (N)	211	13

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	27.5	23.1
Yes (%)	72.5	76.9
Total (N)	211	13

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	78.2	76.9
Yes (%)	21.8	23.1
Total (N)	211	13

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	64.9	76.9
Yes (%)	35.1	23.1
Total (N)	211	13

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.7	0.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	0.4	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	1.6	5.3
1% to 5% of time (%)	11.5	5.3
0% of time (%)	86.4	89.5
Total (N)	243	19

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	White	Faculty of Color
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.2	3.3
more than 50% of time (%)	4.1	.
26% to 50% of time (%)	4.5	5.3
11% to 25% of time (%)	7.0	.
6% to 10% of time (%)	4.9	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	14.0	21.1
0% of time (%)	65.4	73.7
Total (N)	243	19

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	54.7	47.4
Yes (%)	45.3	52.6
Total (N)	243	19

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	89.7	94.7
Yes (%)	10.3	5.3
Total (N)	243	19

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	81.5	89.5
Yes (%)	18.5	10.5
Total (N)	243	19

M3_4: Taught for another academic institution	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	89.7	84.2
Yes (%)	10.3	15.8
Total (N)	243	19

M3_5: Did outside consulting/freelance for pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	57.6	89.5
Yes (%)	42.4	10.5
Total (N)	243	19

M3_6: Did outside consulting/freelance without pay	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	54.7	78.9
Yes (%)	45.3	21.1
Total (N)	243	19

M3_7: Had other secondary employment	White	Faculty of Color
No (%)	98.4	100.0
Yes (%)	1.6	.
Total (N)	243	19

M4: Frequency of volunteer work past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	10.7	15.8
A few times (%)	42.6	57.9
About once per month (%)	17.8	10.5
Two or three times per month (%)	14.9	15.8
At least once per week (%)	14.0	.
Total (N)	242	19

M5: Frequency of public policy work past 5 years	White	Faculty of Color
Never (%)	40.1	52.9
Once or twice (%)	29.3	47.1
Three to five times (%)	15.3	.
Six to ten times (%)	5.4	.
More than 10 times (%)	9.9	.
Total (N)	242	17

M6: Management of work-related demands of past 2 years	White	Faculty of Color
1: Managing everything just fine (%)	4.5	15.8
2 (%)	24.0	26.3
3 (%)	33.1	36.8
4 (%)	29.3	10.5
5: Completely overwhelmed (%)	9.1	10.5
Total (N)	242	19

M7: Change how you spend your work time	White	Faculty of Color
I would change how I spent time (%)	74.1	50.0
I would not change a thing (%)	25.9	50.0
Total (N)	220	16

Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction

N1: Satisfaction with your "fit" in department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	35.3	33.3
3: Satisfied (%)	45.6	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.2	5.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.9	5.6
Total (N)	241	18

N2: I generally feel valued in my department	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.4	29.4
3: Agree (%)	43.3	64.7
2: Disagree (%)	12.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	5.9
Total (N)	240	17

N3a: I am treated with respect by my students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.6	3.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	60.4	70.6
3: Agree (%)	37.9	29.4
2: Disagree (%)	0.9	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.9	.
Total (N)	235	17

N3b: I am treated with respect by dept support staff	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	57.7	44.4
3: Agree (%)	39.4	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	2.1	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	.
Total (N)	241	18

N3c: I am treated with respect faculty in my dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.2	44.4
3: Agree (%)	49.8	50.0
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	5.6
Total (N)	241	18

N3d: I am treated with respect by NCSU administrators	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	32.2	35.3
3: Agree (%)	51.5	58.8
2: Disagree (%)	13.8	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	2.5	.
Total (N)	239	17

N4: I would recommend my department as a good place to work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	41.9	50.0
3: Agree (%)	44.0	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	13.3	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	0.8	5.6
Total (N)	241	18

N5a: Amount of stress due to reappointment, promotion or Tenure	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9
4: A great deal (%)	20.4	35.7
3: Some (%)	30.1	21.4
2: A little (%)	23.3	35.7
1: None at all (%)	26.2	7.1
Total (N)	206	14

N5b: Amount of stress from research/publication demands	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1
4: A great deal (%)	36.2	29.4
3: Some (%)	40.2	52.9
2: A little (%)	16.6	11.8
1: None at all (%)	7.0	5.9
Total (N)	229	17

N5c: Amount of stress from professional Development	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	12.1	5.9
3: Some (%)	38.1	41.2
2: A little (%)	25.5	41.2
1: None at all (%)	24.2	11.8
Total (N)	231	17

N5d: Amount of stress from institutional procedures	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	26.4	13.3
3: Some (%)	39.0	40.0
2: A little (%)	25.1	33.3
1: None at all (%)	9.5	13.3
Total (N)	231	15

N5e: Amount of stress from committee work	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	12.4	.
3: Some (%)	35.9	26.7
2: A little (%)	40.6	66.7
1: None at all (%)	11.1	6.7
Total (N)	234	15

N5f: Amount of stress from relationships with students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	1.9	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	4.3	.
3: Some (%)	20.7	31.3
2: A little (%)	35.3	31.3
1: None at all (%)	39.7	37.5
Total (N)	232	16

N5g: Amount of stress from relationships with faculty in dept	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.9
4: A great deal (%)	8.8	5.9
3: Some (%)	25.6	17.6
2: A little (%)	37.0	41.2
1: None at all (%)	28.6	35.3
Total (N)	238	17

N5h: Amount of stress from relationships w/dept admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.0	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	12.7	11.8
3: Some (%)	19.8	17.6
2: A little (%)	25.3	29.4
1: None at all (%)	42.2	41.2
Total (N)	237	17

N5i: Amount of stress from relationships w/college admin	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.1	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	9.5	.
3: Some (%)	24.0	29.4
2: A little (%)	33.9	11.8
1: None at all (%)	32.6	58.8
Total (N)	221	17

N5j: Amount of stress from workload	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.2	2.8
4: A great deal (%)	44.2	27.8
3: Some (%)	39.2	38.9
2: A little (%)	13.3	16.7
1: None at all (%)	3.3	16.7
Total (N)	240	18

N5k: Amount of stress from work/personal life balance	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	37.4	33.3
3: Some (%)	37.8	38.9
2: A little (%)	19.3	22.2
1: None at all (%)	5.5	5.6
Total (N)	238	18

N5l: Amount of stress from working with under-prepared students	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.6	2.5
4: A great deal (%)	17.0	6.7
3: Some (%)	35.8	46.7
2: A little (%)	34.9	40.0
1: None at all (%)	12.3	6.7
Total (N)	212	15

N5m: Amount of stress from self-assessment Activities	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.3	2.1
4: A great deal (%)	8.0	.
3: Some (%)	31.5	23.5
2: A little (%)	42.0	64.7
1: None at all (%)	18.5	11.8
Total (N)	238	17

N5n: Amount of stress from program assessment requirements	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	2.5	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	15.4	.
3: Some (%)	34.1	29.4
2: A little (%)	35.0	41.2
1: None at all (%)	15.4	29.4
Total (N)	214	17

N6: Overall satisfaction with NCSU	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.9	23.5
3: Satisfied (%)	64.6	58.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.4	17.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	2.1	.
Total (N)	240	17

N7: More or less satisfied with NC State, compared to 5 yrs ago	White	Faculty of Color
Mean Rating	3.1	3.6
A lot more satisfied now (%)	9.6	5.9
Somewhat more satisfied now (%)	33.8	64.7
Neither more or less satisfied now (%)	22.5	17.6
Somewhat less satisfied now (%)	23.8	11.8
A lot less satisfied now (%)	10.4	.
Total (N)	240	17

N8: Ever considered leaving NC State for another university	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	17.1	33.3
Yes - not very seriously (%)	19.2	16.7
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	27.1	33.3
Yes - very seriously (%)	36.7	16.7
Total (N)	240	18

N10: Ever considered leaving academe, since coming to NC State	White	Faculty of Color
No - never considered leaving (%)	40.6	50.0
Yes - not very seriously (%)	27.6	27.8
Yes - somewhat seriously (%)	18.0	11.1
Yes - very seriously (%)	13.8	11.1
Total (N)	239	18

Endnote:

1. "Faculty of Color" includes African American, Asian, Hispanic, and Native American respondents. Due to small cell sizes at this level of analysis,
this categorization of race/ethnicity was necessary to protect respondent confidentiality. (back)

For more information on the NC State University 2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: ncsu_surveys@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2007