[- NC State University -]
Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey: An Overview

Table of Contents

Return to OIRP Survey Page
Return to OIRP Home Page

Office of Institutional Planning and Research, June 1998
Philip Handwerk, Graduate Research Assistant
Denise Gardner, Coordinator of Survey Research


Introduction

The University of North Carolina General Administration (UNC-GA) has developed a system of student surveys to help evaluate institutional performance. During the spring 1998 semester all sixteen UNC campuses conducted a survey of students in the middle of their undergraduate programs (currently registered 'sophomores' who have completed 45-59 hours, with at least 30 at their current institution). This reports represents an initial university-level overview of the results for NC State.

No significant differences by gender, ethnicity, or academic unit were found between NC State's survey group and its broader population of students; thus, the results may be regarded as representative of the sophomore class as defined by UNC-GA. This report presents information regarding the demographics, profile, assessment of faculty contributions, academic environment, and knowledge development of sophomore students at NC State in the Spring of 1998.

Summary

DEMOGRAPHICS OF SOPHOMORE SURVEY RESPONDENTS

No significant differences by gender, ethnicity, or academic unit were found between NC State's survey group and its broader population of students; thus, the results may be regarded as representative of the sophomore class as defined by UNC-GA (currently registered 'sophomores' who have completed 45-59 hours, with at least 30 at their current institution).

Demographics of Sophomore Class and Survey Respondents
Ethnic
Sophomore Class
Survey Respondents
Group
Female
Male
Total
Female
Male
Total

African-American
101

12.7%
88

8.6%
189

10.4%
54

10.3%
44

7.1%
98

8.5%

Asian
28

3.5%
49

4.8%
77

4.2%
20

3.8%
34

5.5%
54

4.7%

Hispanic
7

0.9%
14

1.4%
21

1.2%
4

0.8%
10

1.6%
14

1.2%

Native American
5

0.6%
12

1.2%
17

0.9%
2

0.4%
6

1.0%
8

0.7%

White
652

82.2%
861

84.1%
1,513

83.3%
443

84.7%
530

84.9%
973

84.8%

Total
793

43.6%
1,024

56.4%
1,817

100.0%
523

45.6%
624

54.4%
1,147

100.0%

Classifications by Academic Unit
Population
Survey
Academic Unit
N
%
n
%
Agriculture and Life Sciences (Bachelor's) 37120.4 26423.0
Design63 3.548 4.2
Education and Psychology 804.4 453.9
Engineering496 27.3345 30.1
First Year College 1236.8 635.5
Forest Resources67 3.740 3.5
Humanities and Social Sciences 22712.5 12611.0
Management244 13.4126 11.0
Physical and Mathematical Sciences 593.2 363.1
Textiles87 4.854 4.7

PROFILE INFORMATION

This section presents information about sophomore students, including plans for degree completion, satisfaction with choice of NC State, whether or not they have worked during the academic year, and their impressions of sense of community and diversity issues at NC State.

Plan to Complete Degree and Would Still Choose to Attend NC State

Average Hours Worked Per Week During Academic Year

Note: 67.3% of survey respondents indicated the average hours that they had worked during the current academic year.

Relationship of Work to Academic Major

Sense of Belonging or Community at NC State


Commitment to Minority Success and Diversity Leadership



Disagreement That Racial Conflict and Lack of Respect are Prevalent

FACULTY CONTRIBUTIONS AND ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT

This section presents respondents' evaluations of faculty in nine areas, and their overall evaluations of the learning environment at NC State.

Faculty Contributions


Number of Classes Too Large to Learn Effectively


Number of Classes in Which Student Had Difficulty Understanding Spoken English of Instructor

Overall Intellectual Environment


Overall Evaluation of Quality of Instruction and Education Receiving


SERVICES FOR STUDENTS

This sections examines sophomore ratings of the help available outside the classroom, safety of the campus, and satisfaction with offices that serve students (including service and staff responsiveness). For each service, respondents could choose a "don't know/did not use" option. The table below displays the number and percent of respondents choosing this option for the overall service items. This response is removed from analysis on all services items, as revealed in the next seven charts.

Percent Choosing the "Don't Know / Did Not Use" Option
Service
n
%
Overall skills lab/tutoring 53148.5%
Overall career-related services 26023.8%
Overall effectiveness of orientation 13912.7%
Overall technology services 242.1%
Overall academic advising services 191.7%
Overall library services 171.5%

Overall Ratings of Services Outside the Classroom


Orientation for New Students


Academic Advising


Academic Skill Labs/Tutoring Services

Library Services

Technology Services

Career-Related Services

Availability of Course Materials at Campus Bookstore


Campus Has Taken Sufficient Steps to Ensure Physical Safety


Non-academic service areas were also evaluated. Respondents were asked to rate both the service area and its staff responsiveness, and could choose a "don't know/did not use" option. The table below displays the number and percent of respondents choosing this option. This response is removed from analysis on all items, as revealed in the following two charts.

Percent Choosing the "Don't Know / Did Not Use" Option
Service Area
n
%
Campus counseling (not career) services 80875.1%
Opportunities to participate in community service projects 52247.8%
Financial aid services 48744.6%
Opportunities to develop leadership skills 43539.9%
Campus residence life programs for students living in university-owned housing 39836.4%
Campus health services 37334.0%
Business services / cashier / student accounts 28426.3%
Opportunities to participate in campus recreational and other extra-curricular activities
274

24.9%
Campus food services 22920.9%
Registration process 12811.7%

Evaluation of Non-Academic Service Areas

Evaluation of Non-Academic Service Areas' Staff Responsiveness

KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT

Sophomore students rated the extent NC State had contributed to their knowledge, skills and personal development on a set of goals held by NC State for undergraduate preparation. Respondents rated the contribution using a four-point scale, from "not at all" to "very much", and could also choose a "don't know" options. Only four items had more than 4% "don't know" response: appreciating racial equity (4.9%), appreciating gender equity (5.2%), exercising public responsibility and community service (5.2%), and recognizing and acting upon ethical principles (5.3%). Results, excluding the "don't know" responses, are presented in four areas: technical skills, attitudes and values, established goals for undergraduate education, and personal development.

Contribution Made by NC State to Technical Skills

Contribution Made by NC State to Attitudes and Values

Contribution Made by NC State to Established Goals

Contribution Made by NC State to Student's Personal Development


Return to top