North Carolina State University
2008 Sophomore Student Survey:
College Comparisons
of Evaluations of Student Services

This document reports survey data on college differences in respondents' ratings of student services. Specifically, results are presented for perceptions of campus safety, assessments of academic services outside the classroom, and assessments of non-academic services and the associated staff. Survey results for all respondents are provided in "2008 Sophomore Student Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods see "2008 Sophomore Student Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile." For exact question wording, see the survey instrument, or click on the "Q" in the table headers below.

Campus Safety | Services Outside the Classroom | Non-Academic Service Areas | Financial Aid Services


Q Campus Safety

Campus taken sufficient steps to ensure safety		NCSU	College/School
			CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
Yes	%	80.9	81.9	83.0	77.1	78.8	81.8	82.1	87.8	70.5	85.7	80.6
No	%	7.4	7.9	5.7	9.4	11.5	5.3	5.6	6.1	18.2	7.1	5.6
Not sure	%	11.7	10.2	11.3	13.5	9.6	12.8	12.3	6.1	11.4	7.1	13.9
Total	N	1342	254	53	245	52	374	179	49	44	56	36

Back to Top
Q Rating of Services Outside the Classroom

Length of orientation session		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.70	2.64	2.76	2.58	2.69	2.74	2.80	2.67	2.66	2.83	2.65
4: Excellent	%	10.9	9.7	12.2	8.0	18.8	11.6	11.4	6.7	10.5	14.8	14.7
3: Good	%	55.8	54.2	59.2	52.4	41.7	57.3	63.3	60.0	52.6	57.4	50.0
2: Fair	%	25.4	26.7	20.4	29.7	29.2	24.7	19.6	26.7	28.9	24.1	20.6
1: Poor	%	7.9	9.3	8.2	9.9	10.4	6.4	5.7	6.7	7.9	3.7	14.7
Total	N	1202	236	49	212	48	328	158	45	38	54	34

Quality of orientation programs		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.72	2.79	2.82	2.60	2.71	2.71	2.76	2.80	2.53	2.85	2.71
4: Excellent	%	10.5	9.9	12.2	7.6	16.7	11.7	9.5	8.9	7.9	14.8	11.8
3: Good	%	55.7	62.7	59.2	51.7	47.9	52.1	60.1	64.4	47.4	55.6	52.9
2: Fair	%	29.3	24.0	26.5	34.1	25.0	31.9	27.2	24.4	34.2	29.6	29.4
1: Poor	%	4.5	3.4	2.0	6.6	10.4	4.2	3.2	2.2	10.5	.	5.9
Total	N	1202	233	49	211	48	332	158	45	38	54	34

Helpfulness of orientation staff		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.08	3.09	3.22	3.00	3.21	3.04	3.17	3.11	2.92	3.19	3.06
4: Excellent	%	26.8	28.8	34.7	23.1	31.9	24.8	29.7	20.0	26.3	27.8	32.4
3: Good	%	56.1	52.8	53.1	56.1	57.4	56.6	58.9	71.1	47.4	63.0	41.2
2: Fair	%	15.5	17.6	12.2	17.9	10.6	16.5	10.1	8.9	18.4	9.3	26.5
1: Poor	%	1.7	0.9	.	2.8	.	2.1	1.3	.	7.9	.	.
Total	N	1197	233	49	212	47	327	158	45	38	54	34

Orientations accomodations		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.80	2.81	3.00	2.67	2.91	2.78	2.84	2.88	2.71	2.91	2.79
4: Excellent	%	14.1	14.1	29.8	10.6	23.9	13.5	11.8	9.5	10.5	18.9	20.6
3: Good	%	54.6	56.8	40.4	50.0	47.8	54.5	62.7	71.4	57.9	52.8	38.2
2: Fair	%	28.0	25.2	29.8	35.6	23.9	28.2	23.5	16.7	23.7	28.3	41.2
1: Poor	%	3.2	3.8	.	3.8	4.3	3.8	2.0	2.4	7.9	.	.
Total	N	1174	234	47	208	46	319	153	42	38	53	34

Overall effectiveness of orientation		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.82	2.88	2.84	2.67	2.94	2.81	2.87	2.84	2.63	2.98	2.76
4: Excellent	%	14.2	14.9	16.3	10.8	22.9	15.2	14.4	4.4	10.5	18.5	14.7
3: Good	%	57.7	61.7	55.1	52.4	54.2	55.6	61.3	75.6	57.9	61.1	47.1
2: Fair	%	23.7	20.0	24.5	30.2	16.7	24.6	21.3	20.0	15.8	20.4	38.2
1: Poor	%	4.4	3.4	4.1	6.6	6.3	4.6	3.1	.	15.8	.	.
Total	N	1204	235	49	212	48	329	160	45	38	54	34

Access to advisor		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.00	3.12	3.34	2.93	3.17	3.12	2.35	3.06	2.66	3.52	3.20
4: Excellent	%	32.4	35.9	47.2	28.4	37.0	36.1	10.6	28.0	25.0	64.3	34.3
3: Good	%	42.3	44.5	39.6	44.4	44.4	44.5	35.9	54.0	27.3	23.2	51.4
2: Fair	%	18.2	14.8	13.2	18.5	16.7	14.8	31.8	14.0	36.4	12.5	14.3
1: Poor	%	7.1	4.7	.	8.6	1.9	4.6	21.8	4.0	11.4	.	.
Total	N	1332	256	53	243	54	371	170	50	44	56	35

Sufficient time with advisor		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.91	3.06	3.25	2.81	3.02	2.97	2.40	2.96	2.55	3.56	2.94
4: Excellent	%	30.4	36.2	39.6	25.1	31.5	33.2	11.2	30.0	20.5	65.5	31.4
3: Good	%	38.1	39.0	47.2	38.7	42.6	37.3	36.7	44.0	34.1	27.3	37.1
2: Fair	%	23.0	19.3	11.3	28.4	22.2	22.3	32.5	18.0	25.0	5.5	25.7
1: Poor	%	8.4	5.5	1.9	7.8	3.7	7.1	19.5	8.0	20.5	1.8	5.7
Total	N	1324	254	53	243	54	367	169	50	44	55	35

Accurate info on degree reqs/course sequencing		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.99	3.07	3.17	2.80	3.00	3.14	2.76	2.98	2.73	3.24	2.94
4: Excellent	%	33.1	37.2	39.6	27.6	29.6	36.9	21.3	30.0	25.0	49.1	42.9
3: Good	%	39.8	39.1	39.6	36.6	44.4	43.9	42.0	40.0	34.1	34.5	20.0
2: Fair	%	20.2	17.0	18.9	23.9	22.2	15.4	28.4	28.0	29.5	7.3	25.7
1: Poor	%	6.9	6.7	1.9	11.9	3.7	3.8	8.3	2.0	11.4	9.1	11.4
Total	N	1325	253	53	243	54	369	169	50	44	55	35

Advisor knowledge of policies/procedures		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.99	3.00	3.21	2.82	2.96	3.14	2.81	3.00	2.55	3.31	3.09
4: Excellent	%	28.1	30.8	34.6	20.7	25.9	34.4	16.7	22.0	11.4	50.9	34.3
3: Good	%	48.1	44.0	53.8	50.2	46.3	47.7	54.2	58.0	47.7	32.7	42.9
2: Fair	%	18.7	20.0	9.6	19.4	25.9	15.7	22.6	18.0	25.0	12.7	20.0
1: Poor	%	5.2	5.2	1.9	9.7	1.9	2.2	6.5	2.0	15.9	3.6	2.9
Total	N	1308	250	52	237	54	363	168	50	44	55	35

Academic advising services overall		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.94	3.03	3.26	2.83	3.07	3.06	2.45	2.90	2.59	3.36	3.06
4: Excellent	%	28.2	32.9	43.4	22.5	31.5	31.6	10.1	22.0	22.7	54.5	28.6
3: Good	%	43.5	43.5	39.6	44.3	46.3	46.5	40.5	48.0	31.8	30.9	51.4
2: Fair	%	22.1	17.3	17.0	27.0	20.4	18.4	33.9	28.0	27.3	10.9	17.1
1: Poor	%	6.3	6.3	.	6.1	1.9	3.5	15.5	2.0	18.2	3.6	2.9
Total	N	1328	255	53	244	54	370	168	50	44	55	35

Academic assistance in writing		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.03	2.98	3.00	2.95	3.16	3.02	3.04	3.11	2.83	3.21	3.38
4: Excellent	%	23.0	17.8	25.0	26.8	31.6	22.6	19.6	31.6	8.3	28.6	37.5
3: Good	%	59.2	63.3	50.0	48.2	52.6	59.4	66.1	47.4	75.0	64.3	62.5
2: Fair	%	15.3	17.8	25.0	17.9	15.8	15.1	12.5	21.1	8.3	7.1	.
1: Poor	%	2.5	1.1	.	7.1	.	2.8	1.8	.	8.3	.	.
Total	N	404	90	16	56	19	106	56	19	12	14	16

Academic assistance in reading		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.92	2.84	2.63	2.91	3.20	2.88	2.89	3.20	2.83	3.08	3.18
4: Excellent	%	17.7	12.5	12.5	21.3	40.0	18.7	8.7	30.0	16.7	25.0	18.2
3: Good	%	59.4	60.9	50.0	53.2	40.0	54.9	73.9	60.0	66.7	58.3	81.8
2: Fair	%	19.7	25.0	25.0	21.3	20.0	22.0	15.2	10.0	.	16.7	.
1: Poor	%	3.2	1.6	12.5	4.3	.	4.4	2.2	.	16.7	.	.
Total	N	310	64	8	47	15	91	46	10	6	12	11

Academic assistance in mathematics		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.10	3.06	3.12	3.01	3.21	3.13	3.07	3.44	2.72	2.90	3.39
4: Excellent	%	30.9	28.9	28.0	27.5	32.1	34.4	23.6	56.3	22.2	13.8	43.5
3: Good	%	51.5	50.8	56.0	52.5	57.1	47.3	63.9	31.3	44.4	65.5	52.2
2: Fair	%	14.2	18.0	16.0	13.8	10.7	15.1	8.3	12.5	16.7	17.2	4.3
1: Poor	%	3.4	2.3	.	6.3	.	3.2	4.2	.	16.7	3.4	.
Total	N	621	128	25	80	28	186	72	32	18	29	23

Academic assistance in study skills		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.93	2.86	2.75	2.84	3.17	2.93	2.93	3.27	2.75	2.95	3.14
4: Excellent	%	20.7	20.5	16.7	18.0	33.3	22.4	14.5	33.3	12.5	15.0	28.6
3: Good	%	55.2	50.0	50.0	50.0	50.0	53.3	65.5	60.0	62.5	65.0	64.3
2: Fair	%	20.4	24.4	25.0	30.0	16.7	19.6	18.2	6.7	12.5	20.0	.
1: Poor	%	3.7	5.1	8.3	2.0	.	4.7	1.8	.	12.5	.	7.1
Total	N	377	78	12	50	18	107	55	15	8	20	14

Academic assistance in foreign language		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.90	2.86	2.88	2.90	3.33	2.93	2.78	2.90	2.80	2.82	3.29
4: Excellent	%	21.3	18.0	25.0	25.0	41.7	20.0	14.8	20.0	20.0	27.3	28.6
3: Good	%	53.1	54.0	37.5	48.3	50.0	56.7	55.6	50.0	60.0	45.5	71.4
2: Fair	%	19.9	24.0	37.5	18.3	8.3	20.0	22.2	30.0	.	9.1	.
1: Poor	%	5.8	4.0	.	8.3	.	3.3	7.4	.	20.0	18.2	.
Total	N	277	50	8	60	12	60	54	10	5	11	7

Academic assistance in computer science		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.92	2.94	2.75	3.00	3.27	2.79	3.03	3.25	2.80	3.10	2.92
4: Excellent	%	21.4	21.2	16.7	22.9	36.4	20.2	17.9	33.3	20.0	20.0	23.1
3: Good	%	54.2	55.8	41.7	57.1	54.5	47.9	66.7	58.3	60.0	70.0	53.8
2: Fair	%	19.2	19.2	41.7	17.1	9.1	22.7	15.4	8.3	.	10.0	15.4
1: Poor	%	5.2	3.8	.	2.9	.	9.2	.	.	20.0	.	7.7
Total	N	308	52	12	35	11	119	39	12	5	10	13

Academic assistance in science		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.09	3.15	2.86	3.02	3.19	3.04	3.10	3.17	2.83	3.13	3.20
4: Excellent	%	30.2	35.6	22.7	25.0	29.6	29.1	20.8	33.3	16.7	30.4	36.0
3: Good	%	52.4	48.0	50.0	55.0	59.3	50.8	70.8	50.0	50.0	52.2	52.0
2: Fair	%	13.6	11.9	18.2	16.7	11.1	15.1	6.3	16.7	33.3	17.4	8.0
1: Poor	%	3.9	4.5	9.1	3.3	.	5.0	2.1	.	.	.	4.0
Total	N	597	177	22	60	27	179	48	30	6	23	25

Academic help services overall		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.99	3.02	2.92	2.99	3.10	2.96	3.00	3.24	2.59	2.78	3.17
4: Excellent	%	20.7	20.4	26.9	25.6	27.6	18.9	10.8	41.2	11.8	12.5	25.0
3: Good	%	59.3	61.3	42.3	51.2	55.2	59.7	78.4	41.2	47.1	59.4	66.7
2: Fair	%	18.2	17.7	26.9	19.5	17.2	19.4	10.8	17.6	29.4	21.9	8.3
1: Poor	%	1.8	0.6	3.8	3.7	.	1.9	.	.	11.8	6.3	.
Total	N	705	181	26	82	29	206	74	34	17	32	24

Library hours of operation		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.67	3.69	3.68	3.69	3.70	3.67	3.57	3.71	3.55	3.72	3.79
4: Excellent	%	68.6	71.0	67.9	69.9	75.5	68.5	59.0	70.8	61.9	73.6	78.8
3: Good	%	29.8	27.0	32.1	29.2	20.8	29.8	39.3	29.2	33.3	24.5	21.2
2: Fair	%	1.4	2.0	.	0.4	1.9	1.7	1.7	.	2.4	1.9	.
1: Poor	%	0.2	.	.	0.4	1.9	.	.	.	2.4	.	.
Total	N	1299	252	53	236	53	356	173	48	42	53	33

Staff responsiveness		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.30	3.34	3.31	3.33	3.28	3.33	3.22	3.33	3.11	3.27	3.29
4: Excellent	%	40.8	44.4	37.8	43.5	38.3	41.8	33.6	41.9	27.0	42.2	46.4
3: Good	%	49.6	46.3	55.6	47.0	53.2	49.6	55.9	48.8	59.5	44.4	39.3
2: Fair	%	8.6	8.4	6.7	8.0	6.4	8.2	9.9	9.3	10.8	11.1	10.7
1: Poor	%	1.0	0.9	.	1.5	2.1	0.4	0.7	.	2.7	2.2	3.6
Total	N	1091	214	45	200	47	280	152	43	37	45	28

Access to databases and collections		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.43	3.46	3.41	3.47	3.37	3.44	3.34	3.49	3.28	3.35	3.53
4: Excellent	%	47.8	53.5	41.2	49.8	47.1	48.6	38.0	51.1	35.0	47.1	56.3
3: Good	%	47.3	39.1	58.8	48.5	43.1	46.5	58.3	46.8	57.5	41.2	40.6
2: Fair	%	4.6	7.0	.	0.9	9.8	4.8	3.7	2.1	7.5	11.8	3.1
1: Poor	%	0.2	0.4	.	0.9	.	.	.	.	.	.	.
Total	N	1240	243	51	231	51	331	163	47	40	51	32

Training to use library		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.95	3.04	3.10	2.89	2.91	2.94	2.85	3.17	2.76	3.02	2.89
4: Excellent	%	27.9	29.9	37.5	24.9	31.9	28.7	21.7	31.7	21.1	30.4	39.3
3: Good	%	45.8	48.1	40.0	46.8	36.2	44.3	49.3	53.7	47.4	47.8	25.0
2: Fair	%	19.6	18.6	17.5	21.0	23.4	19.9	21.1	14.6	18.4	15.2	21.4
1: Poor	%	6.6	3.5	5.0	7.3	8.5	7.2	7.9	.	13.2	6.5	14.3
Total	N	1135	231	40	205	47	307	152	41	38	46	28

Library services overall		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.41	3.43	3.43	3.41	3.43	3.42	3.34	3.48	3.30	3.34	3.38
4: Excellent	%	44.5	47.0	43.4	45.6	50.9	45.6	37.6	47.9	37.5	41.5	44.1
3: Good	%	51.5	49.4	56.6	50.2	41.5	50.7	59.0	52.1	55.0	50.9	50.0
2: Fair	%	3.9	3.6	.	3.8	7.5	3.7	3.5	.	7.5	7.5	5.9
1: Poor	%	0.1	.	.	0.4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.
Total	N	1291	251	53	237	53	349	173	48	40	53	34

Access to the Internet		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.57	3.51	3.54	3.53	3.43	3.66	3.55	3.58	3.45	3.57	3.69
4: Excellent	%	61.0	54.9	55.8	57.3	54.7	70.7	57.6	62.0	54.5	58.9	71.4
3: Good	%	35.0	41.2	42.3	38.5	35.8	25.3	39.5	34.0	38.6	39.3	25.7
2: Fair	%	3.6	3.5	1.9	4.2	7.5	3.5	2.8	4.0	4.5	1.8	2.9
1: Poor	%	0.4	0.4	.	.	1.9	0.5	.	.	2.3	.	.
Total	N	1336	255	52	239	53	375	177	50	44	56	35

Hrs of op for comp center labs and help		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.43	3.42	3.45	3.43	3.33	3.48	3.38	3.48	3.09	3.59	3.49
4: Excellent	%	49.3	48.7	47.7	49.8	41.7	52.7	43.9	47.8	37.2	61.2	54.3
3: Good	%	45.3	46.0	50.0	44.9	50.0	43.1	50.3	52.2	39.5	36.7	40.0
2: Fair	%	4.8	4.5	2.3	4.3	8.3	3.9	5.8	.	18.6	2.0	5.7
1: Poor	%	0.6	0.9	.	1.0	.	0.3	.	.	4.7	.	.
Total	N	1206	224	44	207	48	355	155	46	43	49	35

Access to up-to-date facilities		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.41	3.38	3.29	3.41	3.35	3.49	3.36	3.46	3.26	3.41	3.55
4: Excellent	%	48.0	44.8	37.5	46.4	50.0	54.1	42.0	50.0	44.2	47.1	60.6
3: Good	%	45.8	49.0	54.2	48.2	34.6	40.9	52.2	45.8	44.2	47.1	33.3
2: Fair	%	5.7	5.8	8.3	4.9	15.4	4.8	5.1	4.2	4.7	5.9	6.1
1: Poor	%	0.6	0.4	.	0.4	.	0.3	0.6	.	7.0	.	.
Total	N	1254	241	48	224	52	357	157	48	43	51	33

Access to trained staff for help		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.13	3.15	3.15	3.13	3.00	3.10	3.18	3.32	2.98	3.06	3.23
4: Excellent	%	32.7	34.9	26.8	29.8	23.3	32.4	33.6	39.5	31.7	37.3	40.0
3: Good	%	49.4	47.8	61.0	53.6	53.5	47.3	53.1	52.6	41.5	35.3	46.7
2: Fair	%	16.0	14.8	12.2	16.0	23.3	18.6	11.2	7.9	19.5	23.5	10.0
1: Poor	%	1.9	2.4	.	0.6	.	1.7	2.1	.	7.3	3.9	3.3
Total	N	1073	209	41	181	43	296	143	38	41	51	30

Technology training classes		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.14	3.33	3.11	3.05	3.10	3.10	3.19	3.25	2.83	3.14	3.04
4: Excellent	%	33.3	42.0	25.0	28.6	25.8	32.5	32.7	37.5	23.3	42.9	36.0
3: Good	%	49.6	49.6	60.7	50.9	58.1	48.1	54.8	50.0	40.0	35.7	40.0
2: Fair	%	14.7	7.6	14.3	17.9	16.1	16.0	11.5	12.5	33.3	14.3	16.0
1: Poor	%	2.4	0.8	.	2.7	.	3.4	1.0	.	3.3	7.1	8.0
Total	N	781	131	28	112	31	268	104	24	30	28	25

Technology services overall		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.34	3.33	3.33	3.30	3.35	3.42	3.30	3.38	3.17	3.28	3.29
4: Excellent	%	38.9	38.9	34.6	34.8	40.4	46.1	31.9	39.6	33.3	33.3	40.0
3: Good	%	56.3	55.1	63.5	60.8	53.8	49.6	65.7	58.3	52.4	61.1	48.6
2: Fair	%	4.7	6.1	1.9	4.4	5.8	4.0	2.4	2.1	11.9	5.6	11.4
1: Poor	%	0.2	.	.	.	.	0.3	.	.	2.4	.	.
Total	N	1294	247	52	227	52	371	166	48	42	54	35

Opportunity for career assistance		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.08	3.16	3.21	2.89	3.31	3.10	3.04	3.17	3.04	3.15	2.89
4: Excellent	%	27.6	34.1	21.2	22.1	38.9	29.2	23.9	30.6	17.4	25.6	7.1
3: Good	%	55.6	50.2	78.8	50.0	52.8	53.9	59.0	55.6	69.6	64.1	78.6
2: Fair	%	14.4	13.3	.	22.8	8.3	14.4	14.9	13.9	13.0	10.3	10.7
1: Poor	%	2.4	2.4	.	5.1	.	2.5	2.2	.	.	.	3.6
Total	N	960	211	33	136	36	284	134	36	23	39	28

Info. on internships/co-op/other		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.06	3.16	3.06	2.80	3.20	3.16	3.01	3.20	2.73	3.07	2.80
4: Excellent	%	29.9	36.5	20.6	19.4	43.5	34.9	23.8	30.0	15.2	26.8	20.0
3: Good	%	49.7	44.8	67.6	48.4	37.0	48.4	56.5	62.5	48.5	53.7	53.3
2: Fair	%	16.8	16.5	8.8	25.2	15.2	14.1	16.3	5.0	30.3	19.5	13.3
1: Poor	%	3.7	2.2	2.9	7.1	4.3	2.6	3.4	2.5	6.1	.	13.3
Total	N	1068	230	34	155	46	312	147	40	33	41	30

Resources to explore career options		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.05	3.14	3.21	2.82	3.11	3.12	3.01	3.00	2.79	3.10	2.93
4: Excellent	%	28.5	35.6	23.7	18.9	40.9	32.3	25.3	26.3	10.3	23.8	20.0
3: Good	%	50.8	46.7	73.7	50.3	31.8	49.3	54.8	47.4	62.1	61.9	56.7
2: Fair	%	17.5	13.8	2.6	25.2	25.0	16.7	15.1	26.3	24.1	14.3	20.0
1: Poor	%	3.2	4.0	.	5.7	2.3	1.7	4.8	.	3.4	.	3.3
Total	N	1039	225	38	159	44	288	146	38	29	42	30

Info. avail through computers/Internet		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.10	3.18	3.26	2.90	3.26	3.11	3.14	3.21	2.83	3.11	2.97
4: Excellent	%	30.1	34.5	25.6	20.1	44.7	31.0	32.2	36.8	16.7	28.3	21.9
3: Good	%	52.7	51.3	74.4	55.5	38.3	50.3	53.7	47.4	60.0	54.3	59.4
2: Fair	%	14.3	11.6	.	18.9	14.9	17.3	10.1	15.8	13.3	17.4	12.5
1: Poor	%	2.9	2.6	.	5.5	2.1	1.3	4.0	.	10.0	.	6.3
Total	N	1083	232	39	164	47	306	149	38	30	46	32

Career-related services overall		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.04	3.14	3.12	2.81	3.15	3.09	3.01	3.12	2.77	3.09	2.88
4: Excellent	%	24.6	32.1	16.7	15.9	41.3	26.9	21.7	24.4	12.9	22.7	9.4
3: Good	%	56.8	52.1	81.0	53.5	37.0	56.4	60.5	63.4	58.1	63.6	71.9
2: Fair	%	16.2	13.7	.	26.5	17.4	15.4	15.1	12.2	22.6	13.6	15.6
1: Poor	%	2.4	2.1	2.4	4.1	4.3	1.3	2.6	.	6.5	.	3.1
Total	N	1104	234	42	170	46	312	152	41	31	44	32

Avail of books/supplies at bookstore		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.10	3.14	3.15	3.06	2.92	3.16	3.06	3.06	2.88	3.10	3.03
4: Excellent	%	29.5	30.3	26.9	27.7	30.8	34.7	23.4	25.5	19.0	30.6	32.4
3: Good	%	53.3	55.7	61.5	54.5	38.5	48.6	61.4	55.3	57.1	49.0	47.1
2: Fair	%	14.4	11.5	11.5	14.5	23.1	14.7	12.9	19.1	16.7	20.4	11.8
1: Poor	%	2.7	2.5	.	3.4	7.7	1.9	2.3	.	7.1	.	8.8
Total	N	1286	244	52	235	52	360	171	47	42	49	34

Virtual Advising Center Web site		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.03	3.10	3.14	2.96	2.93	3.02	2.97	3.16	2.78	3.10	3.11
4: Excellent	%	20.9	25.3	28.6	18.7	17.9	19.3	14.7	25.0	16.7	26.7	31.6
3: Good	%	62.5	59.6	60.0	62.7	64.3	64.4	67.6	68.8	50.0	56.7	47.4
2: Fair	%	14.9	14.4	8.6	14.2	10.7	15.8	17.6	3.1	27.8	16.7	21.1
1: Poor	%	1.7	0.7	2.9	4.5	7.1	0.5	.	3.1	5.6	.	.
Total	N	746	146	35	134	28	202	102	32	18	30	19

Back to Top
Q Evaluation of Non-Academic Service Areas

Service Area: Registration Process		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.06	3.06	3.04	3.04	3.00	3.09	3.05	3.17	2.78	3.14	3.21
4: Excellent	%	25.2	23.8	20.0	26.9	24.0	25.4	22.0	28.6	17.1	30.6	46.4
3: Good	%	58.7	59.5	68.9	53.9	56.0	60.6	64.0	60.0	53.7	57.1	32.1
2: Fair	%	13.2	15.4	6.7	15.0	16.0	11.7	11.3	11.4	19.5	8.2	17.9
1: Poor	%	2.9	1.3	4.4	4.1	4.0	2.3	2.7	.	9.8	4.1	3.6
Total	N	1125	227	45	193	50	307	150	35	41	49	28

Service Area: Financial Aid Application/Award		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.05	3.04	3.15	2.99	3.09	3.07	3.10	2.96	2.53	3.32	3.15
4: Excellent	%	29.8	29.6	30.0	31.1	29.4	28.6	26.7	25.0	16.7	48.4	45.0
3: Good	%	50.9	50.9	55.0	44.4	55.9	55.3	60.0	54.2	40.0	35.5	30.0
2: Fair	%	13.4	13.8	15.0	16.3	8.8	10.6	10.0	12.5	23.3	16.1	20.0
1: Poor	%	5.9	5.7	.	8.1	5.9	5.5	3.3	8.3	20.0	.	5.0
Total	N	762	159	40	135	34	199	90	24	30	31	20

Service Area: Financial Aid Disbursement		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.05	3.09	3.03	2.97	3.15	3.09	3.07	3.00	2.50	3.33	2.94
4: Excellent	%	29.7	32.4	23.5	32.3	30.3	27.9	26.8	27.3	9.1	48.1	33.3
3: Good	%	51.0	48.5	58.8	42.7	57.6	57.4	57.3	45.5	45.5	37.0	38.9
2: Fair	%	14.1	14.7	14.7	14.5	9.1	10.9	12.2	27.3	31.8	14.8	16.7
1: Poor	%	5.3	4.4	2.9	10.5	3.0	3.8	3.7	.	13.6	.	11.1
Total	N	681	136	34	124	33	183	82	22	22	27	18

Service Area: Food Services		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.66	2.69	2.71	2.62	2.72	2.70	2.77	2.75	2.12	2.57	2.53
4: Excellent	%	15.4	18.7	15.6	12.7	18.0	14.0	19.9	11.4	4.8	13.0	21.9
3: Good	%	47.2	43.9	48.9	47.8	50.0	50.8	47.3	56.8	33.3	43.5	34.4
2: Fair	%	25.7	24.8	26.7	28.8	18.0	26.1	22.6	27.3	31.0	30.4	18.8
1: Poor	%	11.6	12.6	8.9	10.7	14.0	9.1	10.3	4.5	31.0	13.0	25.0
Total	N	1169	230	45	205	50	329	146	44	42	46	32

Service Area: Health Services		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.17	3.19	3.22	3.11	3.07	3.20	3.22	3.22	2.97	3.21	3.00
4: Excellent	%	36.2	39.8	32.6	36.3	34.1	36.1	36.8	31.7	22.2	41.7	27.3
3: Good	%	47.6	40.8	58.7	45.3	46.3	49.4	50.7	58.5	52.8	41.7	50.0
2: Fair	%	13.3	17.9	6.5	11.9	12.2	12.5	10.5	9.8	25.0	12.5	18.2
1: Poor	%	2.9	1.5	2.2	6.5	7.3	1.9	2.0	.	.	4.2	4.5
Total	N	1051	201	46	201	41	263	152	41	36	48	22

Service Area: Counseling (personal)		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.16	3.11	3.00	3.32	3.05	3.16	3.07	2.83	2.86	3.13	3.50
4: Excellent	%	31.0	29.6	11.1	42.3	26.3	31.0	26.2	8.3	14.3	26.7	50.0
3: Good	%	56.2	54.9	77.8	50.0	57.9	56.0	57.1	75.0	71.4	60.0	50.0
2: Fair	%	10.0	12.7	11.1	5.1	10.5	11.0	14.3	8.3	.	13.3	.
1: Poor	%	2.8	2.8	.	2.6	5.3	2.0	2.4	8.3	14.3	.	.
Total	N	361	71	9	78	19	100	42	12	7	15	8

Service Area: Business Services/Cashier		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.06	3.08	3.23	3.03	3.00	3.08	3.11	3.07	2.85	2.92	3.08
4: Excellent	%	24.0	25.7	27.5	23.5	21.4	24.6	25.0	26.7	14.8	15.4	24.0
3: Good	%	60.2	58.3	67.5	60.8	57.1	58.9	62.9	53.3	63.0	64.1	64.0
2: Fair	%	13.9	14.4	5.0	11.1	21.4	16.1	10.5	20.0	14.8	17.9	8.0
1: Poor	%	1.9	1.6	.	4.6	.	0.4	1.6	.	7.4	2.6	4.0
Total	N	915	187	40	153	42	248	124	30	27	39	25

Service Area: Residence Life Programs		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.95	2.98	3.02	2.95	2.77	2.87	3.07	3.16	2.78	3.00	3.04
4: Excellent	%	22.8	22.6	23.8	23.1	19.1	21.6	25.5	34.2	11.1	21.4	28.0
3: Good	%	53.9	56.5	57.1	53.1	46.8	50.4	57.3	50.0	63.9	59.5	52.0
2: Fair	%	18.9	17.5	16.7	19.4	25.5	21.6	16.4	13.2	16.7	16.7	16.0
1: Poor	%	4.4	3.4	2.4	4.4	8.5	6.4	0.9	2.6	8.3	2.4	4.0
Total	N	927	177	42	160	47	250	110	38	36	42	25

Service Area: Opps in ex-curr activities		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.17	3.24	3.43	3.13	3.16	3.09	3.18	3.23	2.97	3.21	3.17
4: Excellent	%	33.2	39.2	47.7	30.3	30.2	29.1	31.3	37.2	25.7	37.2	36.7
3: Good	%	52.4	47.6	47.7	54.5	55.8	53.1	57.3	48.8	51.4	53.5	46.7
2: Fair	%	12.3	11.3	4.5	13.1	14.0	15.6	9.3	14.0	17.1	2.3	13.3
1: Poor	%	2.1	1.9	.	2.0	.	2.2	2.0	.	5.7	7.0	3.3
Total	N	1073	212	44	198	43	275	150	43	35	43	30

Service Area: Opps. in Commun Serv Projs		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.02	3.18	3.39	3.00	3.12	2.87	2.97	3.12	2.55	2.97	3.17
4: Excellent	%	29.5	38.0	44.7	30.2	33.3	21.6	22.1	28.6	9.7	36.1	41.4
3: Good	%	47.8	44.8	50.0	46.2	48.5	47.6	57.3	54.8	51.6	33.3	37.9
2: Fair	%	18.3	14.5	5.3	17.2	15.2	26.9	16.0	16.7	22.6	22.2	17.2
1: Poor	%	4.4	2.7	.	6.5	3.0	3.8	4.6	.	16.1	8.3	3.4
Total	N	938	221	38	169	33	208	131	42	31	36	29

Service Area: Opps to Dev Leadership Skills		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.05	3.12	3.40	3.05	3.18	2.91	3.06	3.16	2.70	3.07	3.29
4: Excellent	%	29.8	34.6	51.2	30.4	35.0	22.4	25.7	30.2	12.1	31.8	50.0
3: Good	%	49.5	45.2	37.2	48.6	47.5	50.6	57.9	55.8	60.6	50.0	35.7
2: Fair	%	16.9	18.0	11.6	16.6	17.5	22.8	12.9	14.0	12.1	11.4	7.1
1: Poor	%	3.8	2.3	.	4.4	.	4.2	3.6	.	15.2	6.8	7.1
Total	N	1006	217	43	181	40	237	140	43	33	44	28

Back to Top
Q Evaluation of Non-Academic Services Staff Responsiveness

Staff Resp: Registration Process		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.03	3.05	3.07	3.02	2.98	3.09	2.88	3.03	2.71	3.28	3.20
4: Excellent	%	25.0	25.4	23.3	28.8	22.4	25.8	17.3	21.2	18.4	37.0	32.0
3: Good	%	56.5	57.1	62.8	49.7	55.1	58.4	60.4	63.6	44.7	54.3	60.0
2: Fair	%	15.2	15.1	11.6	15.8	20.4	15.1	15.8	12.1	26.3	8.7	4.0
1: Poor	%	3.3	2.4	2.3	5.6	2.0	0.7	6.5	3.0	10.5	.	4.0
Total	N	1034	205	43	177	49	279	139	33	38	46	25

Staff Resp: Financial Aid Application/Award		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.03	2.97	3.21	2.96	3.16	3.07	3.03	3.09	2.56	3.25	3.10
4: Excellent	%	31.1	28.9	33.3	32.1	34.4	31.9	25.8	30.4	16.0	46.4	45.0
3: Good	%	47.0	46.7	53.8	42.5	50.0	48.4	56.2	52.2	40.0	35.7	25.0
2: Fair	%	15.6	17.1	12.8	14.9	12.5	14.9	13.5	13.0	28.0	14.3	25.0
1: Poor	%	6.3	7.2	.	10.4	3.1	4.8	4.5	4.3	16.0	3.6	5.0
Total	N	730	152	39	134	32	188	89	23	25	28	20

Staff Resp: Financial Aid Disbursement		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.04	3.02	3.06	2.98	3.16	3.08	3.10	2.95	2.50	3.26	3.13
4: Excellent	%	30.9	32.5	25.0	33.6	29.0	29.8	28.6	26.3	10.0	43.5	50.0
3: Good	%	48.0	43.7	59.4	41.8	58.1	52.6	57.1	42.1	40.0	39.1	25.0
2: Fair	%	15.2	17.5	12.5	13.1	12.9	13.5	10.4	31.6	40.0	17.4	12.5
1: Poor	%	5.8	6.3	3.1	11.5	.	4.1	3.9	.	10.0	.	12.5
Total	N	637	126	32	122	31	171	77	19	20	23	16

Staff Resp: Food Services		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.71	2.75	2.64	2.72	2.69	2.71	2.71	2.69	2.48	2.73	2.77
4: Excellent	%	18.9	22.2	15.9	17.9	16.3	17.4	21.6	11.9	15.0	15.9	30.0
3: Good	%	45.3	41.8	45.5	47.3	44.9	47.7	42.4	54.8	35.0	50.0	40.0
2: Fair	%	23.7	24.4	25.0	23.4	30.6	23.4	21.6	23.8	32.5	25.0	6.7
1: Poor	%	12.2	11.6	13.6	11.4	8.2	11.5	14.4	9.5	17.5	9.1	23.3
Total	N	1135	225	44	201	49	321	139	42	40	44	30

Staff Resp: Health Services		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.10	3.11	3.11	3.01	3.15	3.13	3.19	3.15	2.86	3.17	3.00
4: Excellent	%	34.8	37.1	32.6	33.2	42.5	34.1	38.7	27.5	22.9	38.3	27.3
3: Good	%	45.5	41.6	47.8	43.2	37.5	48.6	44.7	62.5	48.6	44.7	45.5
2: Fair	%	14.8	16.2	17.4	15.1	12.5	13.7	14.0	7.5	20.0	12.8	27.3
1: Poor	%	4.8	5.1	2.2	8.5	7.5	3.5	2.7	2.5	8.6	4.3	.
Total	N	1031	197	46	199	40	255	150	40	35	47	22

Staff Resp: Counseling (personal)		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.14	3.07	3.00	3.28	3.06	3.16	2.98	2.83	3.00	3.36	3.38
4: Excellent	%	33.6	30.4	22.2	43.4	35.3	35.0	23.8	8.3	28.6	35.7	50.0
3: Good	%	50.3	49.3	55.6	44.7	41.2	50.0	54.8	75.0	57.1	64.3	37.5
2: Fair	%	12.1	17.4	22.2	7.9	17.6	11.0	16.7	8.3	.	.	12.5
1: Poor	%	4.0	2.9	.	3.9	5.9	4.0	4.8	8.3	14.3	.	.
Total	N	354	69	9	76	17	100	42	12	7	14	8

Staff Resp: Business Services/Cashier		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.06	3.08	3.21	3.05	3.03	3.05	3.08	3.00	2.75	2.95	3.12
4: Excellent	%	25.0	27.2	28.2	26.8	23.1	24.8	23.7	23.3	8.3	18.9	32.0
3: Good	%	57.8	56.1	64.1	55.7	56.4	57.4	61.9	56.7	62.5	59.5	52.0
2: Fair	%	14.9	14.4	7.7	13.4	20.5	16.1	12.7	16.7	25.0	18.9	12.0
1: Poor	%	2.3	2.2	.	4.0	.	1.7	1.7	3.3	4.2	2.7	4.0
Total	N	883	180	39	149	39	242	118	30	24	37	25

Staff Resp: Residence Life Programs		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.97	2.99	3.14	2.95	2.83	2.89	3.08	3.18	2.81	3.03	3.08
4: Excellent	%	24.9	25.9	21.4	27.5	19.6	23.6	26.9	34.2	11.1	22.5	32.0
3: Good	%	52.6	52.3	71.4	46.3	50.0	49.2	55.6	52.6	69.4	60.0	52.0
2: Fair	%	17.2	17.2	7.1	20.0	23.9	19.8	16.7	10.5	8.3	15.0	8.0
1: Poor	%	5.3	4.6	.	6.3	6.5	7.4	0.9	2.6	11.1	2.5	8.0
Total	N	911	174	42	160	46	242	108	38	36	40	25

Staff Resp: Opps in ex-curr activities		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.13	3.21	3.40	3.11	3.10	3.05	3.14	3.17	2.88	3.21	3.21
4: Excellent	%	31.3	33.8	47.6	30.5	23.8	29.3	29.7	38.1	18.2	36.8	31.0
3: Good	%	53.2	54.6	45.2	53.2	61.9	50.6	56.8	42.9	57.6	52.6	58.6
2: Fair	%	13.0	10.6	7.1	13.2	14.3	16.3	11.5	16.7	18.2	5.3	10.3
1: Poor	%	2.5	1.0	.	3.2	.	3.8	2.0	2.4	6.1	5.3	.
Total	N	1034	207	42	190	42	263	148	42	33	38	29

Back to Top
Q Received Financial Aid

Have you received financial aid at NC State?		NCSU	College/School
			CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
Yes	%	58.2	63.1	78.8	57.3	66.0	56.6	46.9	68.0	52.3	48.2	68.6
No	%	41.8	36.9	21.2	42.7	34.0	43.4	53.1	32.0	47.7	51.8	31.4
Total	N	1331	252	52	241	53	371	177	50	44	56	35

Back to Top
Q Satisfaction with Financial Aid Package

Satisfaction with financial aid package		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.20	3.23	3.39	3.13	3.38	3.14	3.15	3.24	3.26	3.41	3.08
4: Very satisfied	%	36.8	38.4	41.5	36.2	44.1	34.0	32.9	44.1	30.4	48.1	33.3
2: Moderately dissatisfied	%	10.0	10.7	2.4	13.0	5.9	9.6	11.0	8.8	4.3	7.4	16.7
3: Moderately satisfied	%	49.5	48.4	56.1	45.7	50.0	51.2	52.4	41.2	65.2	44.4	45.8
1: Very dissatisfied	%	3.6	2.5	.	5.1	.	5.3	3.7	5.9	.	.	4.2
Total	N	771	159	41	138	34	209	82	34	23	27	24

Back to Top
Q Customer Service Skills of Financial Aid Staff

Financial aid reception staff		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.19	3.11	3.27	3.31	3.19	3.19	3.13	3.18	3.00	3.30	3.17
4: Excellent	%	35.7	33.6	33.3	44.8	42.9	34.3	26.8	36.4	15.4	45.0	33.3
3: Good	%	49.9	45.9	60.0	45.7	33.3	52.2	60.7	50.0	69.2	40.0	50.0
2: Fair	%	12.3	18.0	6.7	5.7	23.8	11.9	10.7	9.1	15.4	15.0	16.7
1: Poor	%	2.1	2.5	.	3.8	.	1.5	1.8	4.5	.	.	.
Total	N	535	122	30	105	21	134	56	22	13	20	12

Financial aid phone staff		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.10	3.01	3.16	3.21	3.18	3.09	3.11	3.18	2.79	3.31	2.82
4: Excellent	%	31.9	28.6	28.0	42.2	41.2	28.8	21.8	40.9	21.4	50.0	27.3
3: Good	%	49.4	47.3	60.0	41.1	35.3	53.4	67.3	45.5	42.9	37.5	36.4
2: Fair	%	15.6	20.5	12.0	12.2	23.5	16.1	10.9	4.5	28.6	6.3	27.3
1: Poor	%	3.1	3.6	.	4.4	.	1.7	.	9.1	7.1	6.3	9.1
Total	N	480	112	25	90	17	118	55	22	14	16	11

Financial aid advisor staff		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.21	3.21	3.28	3.21	3.16	3.23	3.04	3.14	3.33	3.41	3.21
4: Excellent	%	37.5	38.2	31.3	43.1	42.1	35.9	24.5	36.4	41.7	54.5	35.7
3: Good	%	48.8	47.3	65.6	40.2	36.8	53.1	58.5	50.0	50.0	31.8	50.0
2: Fair	%	10.5	11.8	3.1	10.8	15.8	9.4	13.2	4.5	8.3	13.6	14.3
1: Poor	%	3.1	2.7	.	5.9	5.3	1.6	3.8	9.1	.	.	.
Total	N	514	110	32	102	19	128	53	22	12	22	14

Back to Top


For more information on the 2008 Sophomore Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: nancy_whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2009

Return to 2008 Sophomore Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page