North Carolina State University
2008 Sophomore Student Survey:
College Comparisons of Academic Environment

This Web document reports survey data on college differences in the respondents' overall assessment of the academic environment at NC State. Survey results for all respondents are provided in "2008 Sophomore Student Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods, see "2008 Sophomore Student Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile." For exact question wording, see the survey instrument, or click on the "Q" in the table headers below.

Intellectual Enviroment | Overall Instruction and Education | Classroom Environment | Faculty Contributions | Mentoring Experiences

Q Intellectual Environment

Intellectual environment on this campus		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.19	3.26	3.40	3.10	3.15	3.20	3.15	3.20	2.98	3.27	3.37
4: Very strong	%	28.7	32.7	39.6	24.7	24.5	30.2	22.6	32.0	13.6	32.1	42.9
3: Strong	%	62.5	61.4	60.4	61.7	66.0	60.1	71.2	56.0	70.5	62.5	54.3
2: Weak	%	8.1	5.5	.	12.8	9.4	9.0	5.1	12.0	15.9	5.4	.
1: Very weak	%	0.7	0.4	.	0.8	.	0.8	1.1	.	.	.	2.9
Total	N	1333	254	53	243	53	368	177	50	44	56	35

Back to Top

Q Overall Instruction and Education

	NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	PAMS
Overall education at NC State	3.35	3.48	3.53	3.33	3.28	3.30	3.30	3.38	3.39	3.23
Overall quality of instruction	3.12	3.17	3.28	3.14	3.08	3.07	3.08	3.16	3.05	3.11

Back to Top

Classroom Environment

Q Number of Classes Too Large to Learn Effectively

# Classes too large to learn effectively		NCSU	College/School
			CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
None	%	28.6	29.3	20.8	28.9	20.8	30.8	25.1	28.6	38.6	10.7	52.8
One	%	22.2	18.4	34.0	22.8	15.1	22.3	21.8	24.5	34.1	30.4	11.1
Two	%	27.1	28.9	24.5	27.2	39.6	24.7	27.9	28.6	22.7	32.1	16.7
Three	%	13.6	12.5	9.4	15.9	18.9	13.4	10.6	16.3	4.5	23.2	13.9
Four or more	%	8.5	10.9	11.3	5.3	5.7	8.8	14.5	2.0	.	3.6	5.6
Total	N	1345	256	53	246	53	373	179	49	44	56	36

Back to Top

Q Number of Classes had Difficulty Understanding the Instructor???s English

# Classes difficulty understand instructor's English		NCSU	College/School
			CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
None	%	23.4	19.6	18.9	34.3	20.8	19.5	23.3	18.0	29.5	21.4	30.6
One	%	31.6	34.1	34.0	38.0	26.4	23.7	36.7	22.0	40.9	35.7	25.0
Two	%	25.9	28.2	26.4	19.2	34.0	28.0	23.9	28.0	27.3	26.8	25.0
Three	%	12.2	11.0	17.0	5.3	15.1	16.0	13.3	22.0	2.3	14.3	8.3
Four or more	%	6.9	7.1	3.8	3.3	3.8	12.8	2.8	10.0	.	1.8	11.1
Total	N	1347	255	53	245	53	375	180	50	44	56	36

Back to Top

Q Faculty Contributions

Set high expectations to learn		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.33	3.37	3.38	3.27	3.24	3.34	3.28	3.38	3.36	3.36	3.31
4: Excellent	%	37.8	41.2	41.5	33.6	27.8	39.8	33.9	38.0	38.6	43.6	38.9
3: Good	%	57.6	55.6	54.7	60.2	68.5	54.9	61.1	62.0	59.1	49.1	55.6
2: Fair	%	4.2	2.3	3.8	6.1	3.7	5.0	3.9	.	2.3	7.3	2.8
1: Poor	%	0.4	0.8	.	.	.	0.3	1.1	.	.	.	2.8
Total	N	1350	257	53	244	54	377	180	50	44	55	36

Respect diverse talents/ways of learning		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.03	3.06	3.08	2.99	3.04	2.98	3.11	3.08	3.23	2.93	2.92
4: Excellent	%	24.2	28.2	25.0	21.2	22.6	21.2	27.2	26.0	31.8	27.3	16.7
3: Good	%	56.4	52.9	59.6	59.2	58.5	56.2	58.3	58.0	59.1	41.8	63.9
2: Fair	%	17.1	15.3	13.5	16.7	18.9	21.5	12.2	14.0	9.1	27.3	13.9
1: Poor	%	2.2	3.5	1.9	2.9	.	1.1	2.2	2.0	.	3.6	5.6
Total	N	1347	255	52	245	53	377	180	50	44	55	36

Encourage you to be actively involved		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.07	3.12	3.04	3.07	3.04	3.01	3.06	3.24	3.23	3.04	3.06
4: Excellent	%	27.1	30.7	30.2	25.8	24.1	22.3	26.8	38.0	38.6	26.8	33.3
3: Good	%	53.9	51.4	43.4	55.7	55.6	57.8	54.7	48.0	47.7	53.6	44.4
2: Fair	%	17.4	16.7	26.4	17.6	20.4	18.3	15.6	14.0	11.4	16.1	16.7
1: Poor	%	1.6	1.2	.	0.8	.	1.6	2.8	.	2.3	3.6	5.6
Total	N	1350	257	53	244	54	377	179	50	44	56	36

Encourage student-faculty interaction		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.96	2.95	2.98	2.93	2.93	2.97	2.98	3.06	3.16	2.93	2.89
4: Excellent	%	24.5	23.8	24.5	26.1	22.2	23.6	22.3	32.0	31.8	25.0	22.2
3: Good	%	49.8	50.4	49.1	44.1	51.9	51.7	54.7	44.0	52.3	44.6	50.0
2: Fair	%	23.0	22.3	26.4	26.1	22.2	22.3	21.2	22.0	15.9	28.6	22.2
1: Poor	%	2.7	3.5	.	3.7	3.7	2.4	1.7	2.0	.	1.8	5.6
Total	N	1350	256	53	245	54	377	179	50	44	56	36

Give you frequent and prompt feedback		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.03	3.07	2.98	2.99	3.11	3.02	3.02	3.02	2.95	2.98	3.14
4: Excellent	%	24.8	28.0	18.9	22.1	27.8	25.2	24.4	20.0	25.0	23.2	30.6
3: Good	%	54.5	52.5	62.3	54.9	55.6	53.6	55.6	62.0	45.5	53.6	58.3
2: Fair	%	19.2	17.9	17.0	22.5	16.7	19.4	17.8	18.0	29.5	21.4	5.6
1: Poor	%	1.5	1.6	1.9	0.4	.	1.9	2.2	.	.	1.8	5.6
Total	N	1351	257	53	244	54	377	180	50	44	56	36

Encourage devoting time/energy to coursework		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.29	3.36	3.25	3.22	3.17	3.31	3.24	3.22	3.48	3.25	3.25
4: Excellent	%	38.4	43.6	35.8	33.5	31.5	39.9	35.6	34.0	52.3	40.0	36.1
3: Good	%	52.2	49.8	52.8	55.5	53.7	51.6	53.9	54.0	45.5	47.3	55.6
2: Fair	%	8.8	5.8	11.3	11.0	14.8	8.2	10.0	12.0	.	10.9	5.6
1: Poor	%	0.5	0.8	.	.	.	0.3	0.6	.	2.3	1.8	2.8
Total	N	1350	257	53	245	54	376	180	50	44	55	36

Opp. to learn cooperatively w/ students		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.89	2.85	2.91	2.95	3.06	2.82	2.87	3.14	3.18	2.79	2.78
4: Excellent	%	18.1	15.2	20.8	18.1	29.6	15.8	15.0	32.0	38.6	16.1	16.7
3: Good	%	55.1	58.0	49.1	61.3	46.3	53.5	57.8	50.0	43.2	50.0	47.2
2: Fair	%	24.2	23.3	30.2	17.7	24.1	27.3	26.1	18.0	15.9	30.4	33.3
1: Poor	%	2.6	3.5	.	2.9	.	3.5	1.1	.	2.3	3.6	2.8
Total	N	1347	257	53	243	54	374	180	50	44	56	36

Care about academic success and welfare		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	2.95	2.97	3.04	2.93	2.94	2.92	3.02	3.08	3.05	2.75	2.86
4: Excellent	%	23.5	23.5	24.5	21.9	25.9	22.3	25.0	34.0	27.3	14.5	27.8
3: Good	%	52.2	54.1	54.7	52.5	46.3	53.1	55.6	44.0	50.0	49.1	36.1
2: Fair	%	20.4	18.4	20.8	21.9	24.1	19.4	16.1	18.0	22.7	32.7	30.6
1: Poor	%	3.9	3.9	.	3.7	3.7	5.3	3.3	4.0	.	3.6	5.6
Total	N	1346	255	53	242	54	377	180	50	44	55	36

General eval of instructors on 8 items		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.10	3.12	3.11	3.09	3.17	3.07	3.14	3.22	3.26	2.91	3.06
4: Excellent	%	21.0	21.8	18.9	20.0	27.8	19.1	21.3	30.0	31.0	12.7	22.2
3: Good	%	68.9	69.6	73.6	69.0	61.1	69.2	71.3	64.0	66.7	65.5	66.7
2: Fair	%	9.4	7.4	7.5	10.6	11.1	11.4	7.3	4.0	.	21.8	5.6
1: Poor	%	0.7	1.2	.	0.4	.	0.3	.	2.0	2.4	.	5.6
Total	N	1347	257	53	245	54	377	178	50	42	55	36

Back to Top

Q Mentoring Experiences

Had experience		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
Work on ind study w/ faculty	%	5.2%	7.8%	7.5%	4.9%	9.3%	3.4%	5.6%	6.0%	6.8%	0.0%	2.8%
Work on non-course rsch w/ faculty	%	5.1%	8.6%	1.9%	4.5%	13.0%	4.0%	2.8%	8.0%	4.5%	0.0%	5.6%
Work on extension/pub svc proj w/ faculty	%	5.0%	5.8%	1.9%	6.5%	3.7%	3.7%	3.3%	12.0%	4.5%	5.4%	8.3%
Assist teaching class/lab w/ fac guidance	%	4.6%	4.3%	3.8%	6.5%	3.7%	4.8%	1.7%	6.0%	0.0%	7.1%	8.3%
Reg met w/ faculty for academic guidance	%	29.0%	40.9%	20.8%	28.0%	27.8%	23.3%	17.8%	22.0%	40.9%	48.2%	44.4%
Reg met w/ faculty for prof guidance	%	19.7%	28.0%	17.0%	18.7%	29.6%	14.1%	13.9%	18.0%	15.9%	35.7%	25.0%
Reg met w/ faculty for non-acad guidance	%	9.8%	11.7%	7.5%	8.9%	11.1%	8.5%	6.1%	20.0%	15.9%	12.5%	8.3%
Work w/ faculty on campus activities	%	13.4%	18.7%	15.1%	15.9%	22.2%	9.0%	10.6%	12.0%	6.8%	14.3%	11.1%
Total	N	1353	257	53	246	54	377	180	50	44	56	36

Contrib to grwth: ind study w/ faculty		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	PAMS
	Mean	3.58	3.69	3.25	3.55	3.80	3.58	3.22	4.00	4.00	3.00
A great deal	%	64.1	81.3	50.0	54.5	80.0	58.3	33.3	100.0	100.0	.
Some	%	31.3	12.5	25.0	45.5	20.0	41.7	55.6	.	.	100.0
A little	%	3.1	.	25.0	.	.	.	11.1	.	.	.
Not at all	%	1.6	6.3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.
Total	N	64	16	4	11	5	12	9	3	3	1

Contrib to grwth: Non-course rsch w/ faculty		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	PAMS
	Mean	3.37	3.37	4.00	3.10	3.43	3.29	3.25	4.00	4.00	3.50
A great deal	%	51.6	52.6	100.0	30.0	57.1	42.9	50.0	100.0	100.0	50.0
Some	%	38.7	36.8	.	60.0	28.6	50.0	25.0	.	.	50.0
A little	%	4.8	5.3	.	.	14.3	.	25.0	.	.	.
Not at all	%	4.8	5.3	.	10.0	.	7.1	.	.	.	.
Total	N	62	19	1	10	7	14	4	3	2	2

Contrib to grwth: Extension/pub svc proj		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.39	3.27	4.00	3.46	4.00	3.42	3.00	3.50	3.50	3.00	3.50
A great deal	%	44.1	33.3	100.0	46.2	100.0	50.0	33.3	50.0	50.0	.	50.0
Some	%	50.8	60.0	.	53.8	.	41.7	33.3	50.0	50.0	100.0	50.0
A little	%	5.1	6.7	.	.	.	8.3	33.3	.	.	.	.
Total	N	59	15	1	13	2	12	3	6	2	3	2

Contrib to grwth: Assist teaching		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.30	3.89	3.50	3.07	2.00	3.31	3.00	3.33	3.75	2.67
A great deal	%	46.3	88.9	50.0	28.6	.	37.5	.	66.7	75.0	33.3
Some	%	37.0	11.1	50.0	50.0	.	56.3	100.0	.	25.0	.
A little	%	16.7	.	.	21.4	100.0	6.3	.	33.3	.	66.7
Total	N	54	9	2	14	2	16	1	3	4	3

Contrib to grwth: reg mtg w/ faculty-acad		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.57	3.61	3.55	3.53	3.29	3.52	3.64	3.82	3.71	3.63	3.44
A great deal	%	62.0	68.4	54.5	59.1	35.7	58.1	67.9	81.8	70.6	63.0	50.0
Some	%	33.7	26.5	45.5	34.8	57.1	37.2	28.6	18.2	29.4	37.0	43.8
A little	%	3.5	3.1	.	6.1	7.1	3.5	3.6	.	.	.	6.3
Not at all	%	0.8	2.0	.	.	.	1.2	.	.	.	.	.
Total	N	374	98	11	66	14	86	28	11	17	27	16

Contrib to grwth: reg mtg w/ faculty-prof		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.58	3.61	3.67	3.58	3.47	3.53	3.50	3.88	4.00	3.75	3.11
A great deal	%	64.9	68.7	66.7	65.0	46.7	58.8	59.1	87.5	100.0	75.0	44.4
Some	%	29.4	25.4	33.3	27.5	53.3	35.3	31.8	12.5	.	25.0	33.3
A little	%	4.8	4.5	.	7.5	.	5.9	9.1	.	.	.	11.1
Not at all	%	0.8	1.5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.1
Total	N	248	67	9	40	15	51	22	8	7	20	9

Contrib to grwth: reg mtg w/ fac-nonacad		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.63	3.61	3.75	3.72	3.17	3.45	4.00	3.78	3.71	3.86	3.67
A great deal	%	67.3	73.9	75.0	72.2	33.3	48.3	100.0	77.8	71.4	85.7	66.7
Some	%	28.3	13.0	25.0	27.8	50.0	48.3	.	22.2	28.6	14.3	33.3
A little	%	4.4	13.0	.	.	16.7	3.4	.	.	.	.	.
Total	N	113	23	4	18	6	29	7	9	7	7	3

Contrib to grwth: work w/ fac on campus activities		NCSU	CALS	CED	CHASS	CNR	COE	COM	COT	Design	FYC	PAMS
	Mean	3.42	3.59	3.25	3.41	3.58	3.37	3.14	3.20	3.67	3.63	2.75
A great deal	%	57.3	71.8	37.5	52.9	66.7	56.7	35.7	60.0	66.7	62.5	25.0
Some	%	31.8	17.9	50.0	38.2	25.0	30.0	50.0	20.0	33.3	37.5	50.0
A little	%	6.4	7.7	12.5	5.9	8.3	6.7	7.1	.	.	.	.
Not at all	%	4.5	2.6	.	2.9	.	6.7	7.1	20.0	.	.	25.0
Total	N	157	39	8	34	12	30	14	5	3	8	4

Back to Top


For more information on the 2008 Sophomore Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: nancy_whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: April, 2009

Return to 2008 Sophomore Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page