North Carolina State University
2006 Sophomore Student Survey:
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Comparisons
in Assessment of Academic Environment
This document reports survey data on gender and racial/ethnic differences in
respondents’ assessment of the academic environment at NC State. Specifically,
results are presented for respondents’ assessments of the intellectual
environment on campus, the overall quality of instruction and the overall
education they are receiving, the classroom environment, and faculty
contributions. Survey results for all respondents are provided in
"
2004 Sophomore Student Survey: All Respondents."
For
information about the survey and analysis methods see
"
2004 Sophomore Student Survey: Introduction,
Methods, and Student Demographic Profile." For exact question wording,
see the
survey instrument, or click on the "Q"
in the table headers below.
Intellectual Enviroment |
Overall
Instruction and Education |
Classroom Environment |
Faculty Contributions |
Faculty Mentoring Experiences
Q Intellectual Environment
|
All |
Women |
Men |
Af. Am |
White |
Other |
Intellectual environment on this campus |
3.15 |
3.13 |
3.16 |
3.20 |
3.16 |
2.98 |
Frequency Distributions:
Gender/Ethnicity
Back to Top
Q
Overall Instruction and Education
|
All |
Women |
Men |
Af. Am |
White |
Other |
Overall quality of instruction |
3.09 |
3.12 |
3.07 |
3.11 |
3.03 |
2.99 |
Overall education at NC State |
3.30 |
3.34 |
3.27 |
3.33 |
3.25 |
3.15 |
Frequency Distributions:
Gender/Ethnicity
Back to Top
Q Number of Classes
Too Large to Learn Effectively
None |
29.2%
|
27.1%
|
31.1%
|
25.4%
|
31.1%
|
16.3%
|
One |
18.8%
|
22.0%
|
15.8%
|
18.7%
|
17.9%
|
27.4%
|
Two |
27.4%
|
27.5%
|
27.2%
|
29.9%
|
27.1%
|
27.4%
|
Three |
15.4%
|
15.0%
|
15.7%
|
16.4% |
15.2%
|
15.6%
|
Four or more |
9.2%
|
8.4%
|
10.1%
|
9.7% |
8.7%
|
13.3%
|
Back to Top
Q Number of Classes had Difficulty
Understanding the Instructor’s English
None |
19.8%
|
20.3%
|
19.4%
|
26.9%
|
18.7%
|
22.4%
|
One |
30.1%
|
34.5%
|
26.0%
|
35.1%
|
29.1%
|
34.3%
|
Two |
26.8%
|
26.2%
|
27.3%
|
23.9%
|
28.4%
|
15.7%
|
Three |
13.7%
|
11.1%
|
16.3%
|
11.2%
|
12.9%
|
23.9%
|
Four or more |
9.5%
|
7.9%
|
11.0%
|
3.0%
|
10.9%
|
3.7%
|
Back to Top
Q Faculty
Contributions
|
How well do faculty members... |
All |
Women |
Men |
Af. Am |
White |
Other |
Set high expectations to learn
| 3.26 |
3.29 |
3.23 |
3.27 |
3.16 |
3.24 |
Respect diverse talents/ways of learning |
2.96 |
2.97 |
2.96 |
2.98 |
2.84 |
2.94 |
Encourage you to be actively involved |
3.01 |
3.02 |
2.99 |
3.02 |
2.95 |
2.91 |
Encourage student-faculty interaction |
2.95 |
2.92 |
2.97 |
2.98 |
2.84 |
2.84 |
Give you frequent and prompt feedback |
3.01 |
3.02 |
3.00 |
3.03 |
2.94 |
2.92 |
Encourage devoting time/energy to coursework |
3.21 |
3.22 |
3.20 |
3.22 |
3.20 |
3.16 |
Opp. to learn cooperatively w/ students |
2.86 |
2.86 |
2.87 |
2.87 |
2.82 |
2.83 |
Care about academic success and welfare |
2.90 |
2.92 |
2.89 |
2.93 |
2.76 |
2.84 |
General eval of instructors on 8 items |
3.05 |
3.07 |
3.04 |
3.07 |
2.93 |
3.00 |
Frequency Distributions:
Gender/Ethnicity
Back to Top
Q Faculty
Mentoring Experiences
5.9%
|
6.3%
|
5.5%
|
6.1%
|
5.7%
|
6.8%
|
5.4% |
5.4% |
5.4% |
6.8% |
5.0% |
7.5% |
3.8% |
4.3% |
3.3% |
6.3% |
3.5% |
3.8% |
5.3% |
4.7% |
5.9% |
7.7% |
5.1% |
5.3% |
26.2% |
29.0% |
23.7% |
36.7% |
24.4% |
32.3% |
15.2% |
17.1% |
13.5% |
26.2% |
13.5% |
19.5% |
7.6% |
8.2% |
7.0% |
20.0% |
6.4% |
6.1% |
11.8% |
14.1% |
9.6% |
22.5% |
10.3% |
14.4% |
|
3.39
|
3.36
|
3.43
|
3.40
|
3.40
|
3.33
|
3.52
|
3.50
|
3.53
|
3.55
|
3.83
|
3.20
|
3.47
|
3.48
|
3.47
|
3.48
|
3.83
|
3.00
|
3.32
|
3.28
|
3.34
|
3.37
|
3.14
|
3.14
|
3.58
|
3.58
|
3.58
|
3.61
|
3.55
|
3.44
|
3.61
|
3.64
|
3.57
|
3.62
|
3.70
|
3.46
|
3.61
|
3.56
|
3.67
|
3.59
|
3.67
|
3.57
|
3.46
|
3.40
|
3.56
|
3.49
|
3.52
|
3.24
|
Back to Top
For more information on the 2006 Sophomore Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email:
nancy_whelchel@ncsu.edu
Posted: November, 2006
Return to 2006 Sophomore Survey Table of Contents Page
Return to OIRP Survey Page
Return to OIRP Home Page