North Carolina State University
2006 Sophomore Student Survey:
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Comparisons
in Assessment of Academic Environment

This document reports survey data on gender and racial/ethnic differences in respondents’ assessment of the academic environment at NC State. Specifically, results are presented for respondents’ assessments of the intellectual environment on campus, the overall quality of instruction and the overall education they are receiving, the classroom environment, and faculty contributions. Survey results for all respondents are provided in "2004 Sophomore Student Survey: All Respondents." For information about the survey and analysis methods see "2004 Sophomore Student Survey: Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile." For exact question wording, see the survey instrument, or click on the "Q" in the table headers below.

Intellectual Enviroment | Overall Instruction and Education | Classroom Environment | Faculty Contributions | Faculty Mentoring Experiences


Q Intellectual Environment
  Mean Rating
(Based on a scale where 4='very strong' 3='strong' 2='weak'
All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Intellectual environment on this campus 3.15 3.13 3.16 3.20 3.16 2.98
Frequency Distributions: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to Top
Q Overall Instruction and Education
  Mean Rating
(Based on a scale where 4='very strong' 3='strong' 2='weak'
All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Overall quality of instruction 3.09 3.12 3.07 3.11 3.03 2.99
Overall education at NC State 3.30 3.34 3.27 3.33 3.25 3.15
Frequency Distributions: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to Top
Q Number of Classes Too Large to Learn Effectively
# Classes too large to learn effectively All Women Men AfAm White Other
None 29.2% 27.1% 31.1% 25.4% 31.1% 16.3%
One 18.8% 22.0% 15.8% 18.7% 17.9% 27.4%
Two 27.4% 27.5% 27.2% 29.9% 27.1% 27.4%
Three 15.4% 15.0% 15.7% 16.4% 15.2% 15.6%
Four or more 9.2% 8.4% 10.1% 9.7% 8.7% 13.3%
Back to Top
Q Number of Classes had Difficulty Understanding the Instructor’s English
# Classes difficulty understand instructor's English All Women Men AfAm White Other
None 19.8% 20.3% 19.4% 26.9% 18.7% 22.4%
One 30.1% 34.5% 26.0% 35.1% 29.1% 34.3%
Two 26.8% 26.2% 27.3% 23.9% 28.4% 15.7%
Three 13.7% 11.1% 16.3% 11.2% 12.9% 23.9%
Four or more 9.5% 7.9% 11.0% 3.0% 10.9% 3.7%
Back to Top
Q Faculty Contributions
  Mean Rating
(Based on a scale where 4='excellent' 3='good' 2='fair' and 1='poor')
How well do faculty members... All Women Men Af. Am White Other
Set high expectations to learn 3.26 3.29 3.23 3.27 3.16 3.24
Respect diverse talents/ways of learning 2.96 2.97 2.96 2.98 2.84 2.94
Encourage you to be actively involved 3.01 3.02 2.99 3.02 2.95 2.91
Encourage student-faculty interaction 2.95 2.92 2.97 2.98 2.84 2.84
Give you frequent and prompt feedback 3.01 3.02 3.00 3.03 2.94 2.92
Encourage devoting time/energy to coursework 3.21 3.22 3.20 3.22 3.20 3.16
Opp. to learn cooperatively w/ students 2.86 2.86 2.87 2.87 2.82 2.83
Care about academic success and welfare 2.90 2.92 2.89 2.93 2.76 2.84
General eval of instructors on 8 items 3.05 3.07 3.04 3.07 2.93 3.00
Frequency Distributions: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to Top

Q Faculty Mentoring Experiences
Had experience at NC State NCSU Women Men AfAm White Other
Work on ind study w/ faculty 5.9% 6.3% 5.5% 6.1% 5.7% 6.8%
Work on non-course rsch w/ faculty 5.4% 5.4% 5.4% 6.8% 5.0% 7.5%
Work on extension/pub svc proj w/ faculty 3.8% 4.3% 3.3% 6.3% 3.5% 3.8%
Assist teaching class/lab w/ fac guidance 5.3% 4.7% 5.9% 7.7% 5.1% 5.3%
Reg met w/ faculty for academic guidance 26.2% 29.0% 23.7% 36.7% 24.4% 32.3%
Reg met w/ faculty for prof guidance 15.2% 17.1% 13.5% 26.2% 13.5% 19.5%
Reg met w/ faculty for non-acad guidance 7.6% 8.2% 7.0% 20.0% 6.4% 6.1%
Work w/ faculty on campus activities 11.8% 14.1% 9.6% 22.5% 10.3% 14.4%


  Mean Rating
(Scale: 4='A Great Deal' 3='Some' 2='A Little' and 1='Not At All')
Experience's contribution to growth NCSU Women Men White AfAm Other
Work on ind study w/ faculty 3.39 3.36 3.43 3.40 3.40 3.33
Work on non-course rsch w/ faculty 3.52 3.50 3.53 3.55 3.83 3.20
Work on extension/pub svc proj w/ faculty 3.47 3.48 3.47 3.48 3.83 3.00
Assist teaching class/lab w/ fac guidance 3.32 3.28 3.34 3.37 3.14 3.14
Reg met w/ faculty for academic guidance 3.58 3.58 3.58 3.61 3.55 3.44
Reg met w/ faculty for prof guidance 3.61 3.64 3.57 3.62 3.70 3.46
Reg met w/ faculty for non-acad guidance 3.61 3.56 3.67 3.59 3.67 3.57
Work w/ faculty on campus activities 3.46 3.40 3.56 3.49 3.52 3.24
Back to Top


For more information on the 2006 Sophomore Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: nancy_whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: November, 2006

Return to 2006 Sophomore Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page