North Carolina State University
2000 Sophomore Student Survey:
College Comparisons Tables
(Knowledge, Skills and Personal Development)

Knowledge, Skills and Personal Development
* General education goals
* Personal development goals
* World view goals
* Needs being met by NCSU

Knowledge, Skills and Personal Development

Q General education goals

Writing skills NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.11 3.13 2.91 3.38 2.95 3.00 3.41 2.96 3.17 3.22 3.11
    2.8 2.1 9.1 1.4 4.1 5.6 0.7 3.8 1.7 1.3 2.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 15.7 13.2 15.2 8.5 20.2 13.9 7.9 28.3 19.0 13.3 14.6
3: Somewhat % 49.2 54.1 51.5 40.8 52.5 55.6 41.1 35.8 39.7 47.3 53.1
4: Very Much % 32.3 30.6 24.2 49.3 23.2 25.0 50.3 32.1 39.7 38.0 30.2
Back to top
 
Speaking skills NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.94 2.96 2.73 3.00 2.80 2.83 3.20 2.61 3.11 3.17 2.85
    7.3 5.4 18.2 9.9 8.5 8.3 3.4 13.7 5.4 4.1 8.6
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 19.9 20.1 21.2 14.1 24.6 25.0 14.8 27.5 10.7 12.3 20.4
3: Somewhat % 45.0 47.3 30.3 42.3 45.5 41.7 40.3 43.1 51.8 45.9 48.4
4: Very Much % 27.9 27.2 30.3 33.8 21.4 25.0 41.6 15.7 32.1 37.7 22.6
Back to top
 
Listening skills NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.24 3.35 3.09 3.24 3.16 3.09 3.39 3.09 3.40 3.26 3.21
    3.2 1.7 6.1 4.3 4.1 5.7 0.7 5.7 . 3.4 4.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 10.5 8.8 15.2 4.3 12.4 17.1 9.2 13.2 10.5 8.7 9.4
3: Somewhat % 45.1 42.5 42.4 54.3 46.6 40.0 40.8 47.2 38.6 47.0 47.9
4: Very Much % 41.2 47.1 36.4 37.1 36.9 37.1 49.3 34.0 50.9 40.9 38.5
Back to top
 
Comprehension skills NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.30 3.38 3.06 3.34 3.25 3.31 3.40 3.23 3.36 3.29 3.23
    1.9 1.2 3.0 1.4 2.5 . 0.7 3.8 1.7 2.0 2.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 10.5 9.5 21.2 8.6 10.7 14.3 7.9 9.4 15.5 8.7 12.6
3: Somewhat % 43.4 39.7 42.4 44.3 46.0 40.0 42.1 47.2 27.6 47.3 45.3
4: Very Much % 44.2 49.6 33.3 45.7 40.8 45.7 49.3 39.6 55.2 42.0 40.0
Back to top
 
Using math skills NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.39 3.29 2.97 3.11 3.70 3.42 2.87 3.54 3.33 3.36 3.38
    2.0 1.2 . 4.2 0.7 . 6.8 . 1.7 1.3 5.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 10.6 14.4 32.4 14.1 2.7 8.3 22.3 9.6 15.5 11.9 5.2
3: Somewhat % 33.7 38.3 38.2 47.9 22.8 41.7 48.0 26.9 31.0 36.4 36.5
4: Very Much % 53.7 46.1 29.4 33.8 73.8 50.0 23.0 63.5 51.7 50.3 53.1
Back to top
 
Applying scientific inquiry NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.34 3.57 2.70 3.35 3.50 3.42 2.89 3.37 3.35 3.04 3.25
    1.8 0.4 18.5 . 1.8 2.8 2.7 1.9 1.8 0.7 1.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 10.0 3.3 14.8 5.9 5.7 5.6 27.7 7.7 7.0 20.1 11.0
3: Somewhat % 40.9 35.5 44.4 52.9 33.3 38.9 47.3 42.3 45.6 53.2 49.5
4: Very Much % 47.3 60.7 22.2 41.2 59.2 52.8 22.3 48.1 45.6 25.9 38.5
Back to top
 
Enhancing analytical skills NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.45 3.53 3.26 3.42 3.56 3.61 3.25 3.35 3.39 3.28 3.34
    0.9 . 3.2 1.4 0.9 . 1.4 2.0 . 1.4 1.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 6.3 2.1 6.5 8.7 4.4 3.0 13.9 2.0 8.9 10.3 8.6
3: Somewhat % 40.0 42.9 51.6 36.2 32.3 33.3 43.1 54.9 42.9 46.9 45.2
4: Very Much % 52.7 55.0 38.7 53.6 62.4 63.6 41.7 41.2 48.2 41.4 45.2
Back to top
 
Developing computer skills NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.52 3.49 3.27 3.34 3.62 3.53 3.41 3.38 3.52 3.53 3.62
    1.7 1.3 9.1 4.2 1.1 . 1.3 1.9 3.4 2.0 .
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 7.4 9.2 6.1 11.3 6.1 5.6 14.1 11.5 3.4 3.4 3.2
3: Somewhat % 28.0 28.5 33.3 31.0 22.7 36.1 26.8 32.7 31.0 34.2 31.6
4: Very Much % 63.0 61.1 51.5 53.5 70.0 58.3 57.7 53.8 62.1 60.4 65.3
Back to top
 
Understanding of diverse backgrounds/values NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.13 3.23 3.03 3.40 3.00 3.14 3.28 3.02 3.14 3.12 3.12
    5.0 3.8 6.1 1.4 6.6 5.7 4.1 3.8 1.8 5.4 5.6
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 15.8 13.4 15.2 10.0 18.7 14.3 10.9 26.9 14.3 16.3 14.6
3: Somewhat % 40.9 38.9 48.5 35.7 43.2 40.0 38.1 32.7 51.8 39.5 41.6
4: Very Much % 38.4 43.9 30.3 52.9 31.5 40.0 46.9 36.5 32.1 38.8 38.2
Back to top
 
Understanding influence of science/technology NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.39 3.52 3.03 3.33 3.47 3.26 3.19 3.34 3.55 3.29 3.34
    1.7 . 5.9 1.5 1.6 5.7 2.7 3.8 1.8 2.0 1.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 8.0 7.8 20.6 9.0 5.5 11.4 11.5 5.7 1.8 12.7 6.4
3: Somewhat % 39.5 32.5 38.2 44.8 37.2 34.3 50.0 43.4 35.7 40.0 50.0
4: Very Much % 50.7 59.7 35.3 44.8 55.7 48.6 35.8 47.2 60.7 45.3 42.6
Back to top
 
Ability to analyze ideas/information NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.37 3.44 3.39 3.43 3.34 3.35 3.33 3.19 3.48 3.33 3.36
    1.4 0.4 3.0 1.4 1.6 5.9 1.4 1.9 1.8 1.3 1.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 7.3 4.9 9.1 7.2 9.4 5.9 6.8 11.3 3.6 7.3 4.2
3: Somewhat % 44.5 44.4 33.3 37.7 42.1 35.3 49.3 52.8 39.3 48.0 52.6
4: Very Much % 46.8 50.2 54.5 53.6 46.9 52.9 42.6 34.0 55.4 43.3 42.1
Back to top
 
Ability to do projects independently NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.39 3.52 3.79 3.43 3.31 3.29 3.42 3.11 3.57 3.42 3.34
    2.1 1.3 . 2.9 2.5 8.6 0.7 3.8 . 3.4 1.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 6.0 4.2 2.9 4.3 7.5 2.9 4.1 20.8 1.8 4.7 6.3
3: Somewhat % 42.1 36.0 14.7 39.1 46.8 40.0 47.9 35.8 39.3 38.3 50.5
4: Very Much % 49.8 58.6 82.4 53.6 43.2 48.6 47.3 39.6 58.9 53.7 42.1
Back to top
 

Q Personal development goals

Recognizing and acting upon ethical principles NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.04 3.11 2.81 3.25 2.91 2.94 3.13 2.88 3.17 3.18 3.05
    6.5 5.3 12.9 3.0 8.2 5.9 6.7 12.0 5.6 3.4 4.4
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 16.4 12.8 16.1 11.9 20.7 23.5 14.1 20.0 7.4 14.2 17.6
3: Somewhat % 43.9 48.0 48.4 41.8 43.2 41.2 38.9 36.0 51.9 43.9 46.2
4: Very Much % 33.1 33.9 22.6 43.3 27.9 29.4 40.3 32.0 35.2 38.5 31.9
Back to top
 
Public responsibility & comununity service NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.85 3.01 2.52 3.06 2.74 2.82 2.93 2.58 2.98 2.90 2.85
    7.8 4.3 12.1 4.5 8.7 8.8 9.7 17.0 3.7 8.8 6.5
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 21.0 17.1 33.3 17.9 25.3 23.5 14.5 20.8 20.4 16.9 26.1
3: Somewhat % 48.9 52.1 45.5 44.8 49.2 44.1 49.0 49.1 50.0 50.0 43.5
4: Very Much % 22.2 26.5 9.1 32.8 16.9 23.5 26.9 13.2 25.9 24.3 23.9
Back to top
 
Ability to lead/guide others NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.13 3.25 3.12 3.16 3.05 3.09 3.16 2.81 3.35 3.19 3.05
    3.9 1.2 8.8 4.4 4.6 8.6 3.4 11.3 . 3.3 3.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 14.5 11.5 17.6 14.7 16.0 8.6 12.3 18.9 12.7 12.7 20.8
3: Somewhat % 46.9 48.0 26.5 41.2 49.7 48.6 49.3 47.2 40.0 46.0 43.8
4: Very Much % 34.7 39.3 47.1 39.7 29.7 34.3 34.9 22.6 47.3 38.0 32.3
Back to top
 
Ability to function as part of team NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.29 3.41 3.47 3.29 3.26 3.11 3.24 3.06 3.50 3.29 3.14
    2.5 0.4 . 1.5 3.2 5.7 2.7 7.5 1.8 2.0 3.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 9.7 6.6 5.9 7.4 9.6 11.4 10.9 18.9 7.1 9.3 16.0
3: Somewhat % 44.4 44.4 41.2 51.5 44.9 48.6 46.3 34.0 30.4 46.7 44.7
4: Very Much % 43.4 48.6 52.9 39.7 42.3 34.3 40.1 39.6 60.7 42.0 36.2
Back to top
 
Value learning as lifelong NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.39 3.56 3.47 3.52 3.30 3.29 3.37 3.12 3.44 3.39 3.40
    2.4 1.7 6.3 . 3.2 2.9 2.7 5.8 1.8 1.4 1.0
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 7.3 2.9 6.3 6.0 9.5 5.7 4.8 19.2 3.5 10.8 5.2
3: Somewhat % 39.3 33.6 21.9 35.8 41.1 51.4 45.6 32.7 43.9 35.1 46.9
4: Very Much % 50.9 61.8 65.6 58.2 46.2 40.0 46.9 42.3 50.9 52.7 46.9
Back to top
 
Commitment to fitness NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.08 3.26 2.88 3.06 2.97 3.14 2.99 2.92 3.25 3.22 3.08
    6.3 2.9 5.9 7.2 7.6 8.6 7.4 9.4 1.8 5.3 9.4
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 15.3 14.8 32.4 13.0 17.6 11.4 17.4 13.2 8.8 11.9 10.4
3: Somewhat % 42.4 36.2 29.4 46.4 45.1 37.1 43.6 52.8 52.6 38.4 42.7
4: Very Much % 35.9 46.1 32.4 33.3 29.7 42.9 31.5 24.5 36.8 44.4 37.5
Back to top
 
Taking responsibility for behavior NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.41 3.53 3.00 3.43 3.35 3.31 3.41 3.21 3.54 3.48 3.47
    3.9 1.7 14.7 2.9 5.0 8.6 4.7 5.8 . 2.0 3.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 8.3 7.0 14.7 10.1 8.6 8.6 8.1 11.5 10.7 6.7 6.3
3: Somewhat % 30.6 27.7 26.5 27.5 33.0 25.7 29.1 38.5 25.0 32.7 30.5
4: Very Much % 57.2 63.6 44.1 59.4 53.4 57.1 58.1 44.2 64.3 58.7 60.0
Back to top
 
Self-confidence NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.20 3.31 3.18 3.22 3.13 3.09 3.23 2.85 3.33 3.33 3.16
    4.8 2.1 6.1 1.5 6.8 5.9 4.0 11.5 1.8 2.6 6.3
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 12.7 12.0 18.2 17.6 12.5 20.6 13.4 17.3 10.9 8.6 11.5
3: Somewhat % 39.8 38.4 27.3 38.2 41.0 32.4 37.6 46.2 40.0 41.7 42.7
4: Very Much % 42.7 47.5 48.5 42.6 39.6 41.2 45.0 25.0 47.3 47.0 39.6
Back to top
 
Sense of personal identity NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.25 3.38 3.39 3.32 3.14 3.17 3.23 3.02 3.31 3.47 3.14
    4.7 2.9 . 1.5 6.2 5.7 4.1 7.5 3.6 3.3 8.4
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 13.1 10.4 18.2 14.7 15.0 20.0 13.5 17.0 12.7 7.3 11.6
3: Somewhat % 34.8 32.9 24.2 33.8 37.4 25.7 37.8 41.5 32.7 28.5 37.9
4: Very Much % 47.5 53.8 57.6 50.0 41.5 48.6 44.6 34.0 50.9 60.9 42.1
Back to top
 
Independence and self-reliance NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.51 3.62 3.55 3.48 3.44 3.29 3.41 3.40 3.77 3.59 3.59
    2.4 2.0 3.0 . 3.6 2.9 2.0 3.8 1.8 0.7 2.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 5.7 2.9 3.0 8.7 6.4 11.4 9.5 9.4 1.8 4.6 3.2
3: Somewhat % 30.2 25.8 30.3 34.8 32.7 40.0 33.3 30.2 14.0 29.6 28.4
4: Very Much % 61.7 69.3 63.6 56.5 57.3 45.7 55.1 56.6 82.5 65.1 66.3
Back to top
 
Potential for success NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.44 3.55 3.53 3.51 3.35 3.29 3.41 3.15 3.59 3.58 3.45
    3.2 1.2 5.9 . 4.3 2.9 3.3 7.5 3.6 1.3 4.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 5.3 3.7 . 5.8 6.8 14.3 5.3 13.2 1.8 2.0 3.1
3: Somewhat % 35.9 33.6 29.4 37.7 38.3 34.3 38.4 35.8 26.8 34.2 36.5
4: Very Much % 55.7 61.5 64.7 56.5 50.6 48.6 53.0 43.4 67.9 62.5 56.3
Back to top
 
Coping with change NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.36 3.44 3.48 3.50 3.29 3.23 3.35 3.11 3.55 3.46 3.31
    3.1 2.5 . 1.5 4.6 2.9 3.3 3.8 1.8 1.3 3.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 8.3 5.8 9.1 2.9 7.8 17.1 10.0 20.8 8.9 6.6 10.5
3: Somewhat % 37.5 37.0 33.3 39.7 41.0 34.3 34.7 35.8 21.4 37.1 38.9
4: Very Much % 51.1 54.7 57.6 55.9 46.5 45.7 52.0 39.6 67.9 55.0 47.4
Back to top
 
Ability to handle stress NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.15 3.23 3.18 3.13 3.12 3.09 3.09 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.17
    6.0 4.1 9.1 5.8 7.1 5.7 5.3 11.3 7.1 4.6 4.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 14.4 11.5 9.1 13.0 16.2 17.1 13.9 28.3 10.7 11.9 14.6
3: Somewhat % 38.7 41.4 36.4 43.5 34.9 40.0 47.7 34.0 32.1 37.1 41.7
4: Very Much % 40.9 43.0 45.5 37.7 41.9 37.1 33.1 26.4 50.0 46.4 39.6
Back to top
 
Personal growth NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.41 3.54 3.50 3.53 3.34 3.31 3.36 3.06 3.48 3.51 3.43
    2.9 1.6 3.1 1.5 3.4 5.7 4.0 7.5 3.6 1.3 2.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 6.2 3.7 9.4 . 7.8 11.4 4.0 17.0 3.6 5.9 6.3
3: Somewhat % 37.4 33.3 21.9 42.6 40.0 28.6 44.0 37.7 33.9 33.6 38.5
4: Very Much % 53.4 61.3 65.6 55.9 48.9 54.3 48.0 37.7 58.9 59.2 53.1
Back to top
 
Time management NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.29 3.39 3.36 3.26 3.23 3.00 3.21 2.98 3.51 3.49 3.22
    4.1 2.5 3.0 5.8 4.3 8.6 4.6 9.4 5.3 2.0 3.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 10.5 7.8 12.1 11.6 12.5 17.1 11.3 22.6 . 3.3 14.6
3: Somewhat % 38.1 38.5 30.3 33.3 39.0 40.0 42.4 28.3 33.3 38.2 39.6
4: Very Much % 47.3 51.2 54.5 49.3 44.2 34.3 41.7 39.6 61.4 56.6 42.7
Back to top
 
Self discipline NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.39 3.50 3.38 3.47 3.33 3.23 3.32 3.17 3.56 3.49 3.35
    3.1 1.6 . 1.5 4.1 5.7 3.4 7.7 3.5 2.0 2.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 8.0 6.2 17.6 4.4 8.7 8.6 9.4 11.5 . 6.6 10.6
3: Somewhat % 35.8 32.5 26.5 39.7 37.2 42.9 39.6 36.5 33.3 31.6 37.2
4: Very Much % 53.1 59.7 55.9 54.4 49.9 42.9 47.7 44.2 63.2 59.9 50.0
Back to top
 

Q World view goals

Developing tolerance for diverse views NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.19 3.27 3.13 3.38 3.11 3.28 3.26 2.96 3.23 3.19 3.23
    4.8 3.8 6.7 1.5 6.5 5.6 4.2 9.8 1.9 3.4 3.4
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 11.9 10.2 10.0 9.1 14.1 11.1 7.7 17.6 11.5 12.9 10.3
3: Somewhat % 42.4 41.1 46.7 39.4 41.0 33.3 46.2 39.2 48.1 44.9 46.0
4: Very Much % 40.9 44.9 36.7 50.0 38.4 50.0 42.0 33.3 38.5 38.8 40.2
Back to top
 
Appreciating racial equity NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.98 3.06 2.65 3.18 2.88 2.85 3.16 2.83 3.30 2.95 2.94
    7.6 4.6 17.6 2.9 8.7 14.7 2.8 13.5 1.9 10.6 10.0
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 16.5 16.0 23.5 14.7 19.1 11.8 13.9 17.3 7.5 14.6 17.8
3: Somewhat % 46.1 47.7 35.3 44.1 47.9 47.1 47.9 42.3 49.1 43.7 40.0
4: Very Much % 29.9 31.6 23.5 38.2 24.2 26.5 35.4 26.9 41.5 31.1 32.2
Back to top
 
Appreciating gender equity NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.00 3.11 2.82 3.16 2.86 2.97 3.14 2.83 3.29 3.01 3.00
    7.1 3.8 14.7 3.0 8.2 9.1 3.4 15.4 3.8 9.3 8.7
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 16.6 15.3 17.6 19.4 20.0 15.2 14.5 15.4 7.7 13.3 17.4
3: Somewhat % 45.4 47.2 38.2 35.8 48.8 45.5 46.2 40.4 44.2 44.7 39.1
4: Very Much % 30.8 33.6 29.4 41.8 22.9 30.3 35.9 28.8 44.2 32.7 34.8
Back to top
 
Advancing appreciation of the arts NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.70 2.69 3.56 2.77 2.55 2.65 2.86 2.51 2.95 2.72 2.78
    12.6 12.0 2.9 7.2 16.5 20.6 8.3 15.1 3.6 11.0 14.1
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 27.4 26.9 8.8 30.4 29.0 23.5 24.1 35.8 29.1 30.8 20.7
3: Somewhat % 37.2 41.0 17.6 40.6 37.6 26.5 40.7 32.1 36.4 33.6 38.0
4: Very Much % 22.8 20.1 70.6 21.7 16.9 29.4 26.9 17.0 30.9 24.7 27.2
Back to top
 
Understanding world issues NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.98 3.08 3.03 3.19 2.79 2.86 3.24 2.81 3.09 3.00 3.06
    5.0 2.9 6.1 1.4 7.4 11.4 2.1 7.7 5.6 4.6 2.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 20.0 17.6 18.2 14.5 26.0 17.1 11.6 26.9 14.8 19.9 17.2
3: Somewhat % 47.1 47.7 42.4 47.8 47.4 45.7 46.6 42.3 44.4 46.4 52.7
4: Very Much % 27.9 31.8 33.3 36.2 19.3 25.7 39.7 23.1 35.2 29.1 28.0
Back to top
 
Understanding the present as it relates to history NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.95 2.99 2.91 2.90 2.80 2.71 3.26 2.88 3.06 3.02 2.99
    5.0 3.8 5.9 2.9 6.1 17.1 1.3 11.5 1.9 4.0 5.7
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 20.1 20.4 20.6 25.0 26.3 17.1 10.7 11.5 22.2 15.2 13.6
3: Somewhat % 50.2 48.8 50.0 51.5 49.2 42.9 48.3 53.8 44.4 55.6 56.8
4: Very Much % 24.7 27.1 23.5 20.6 18.4 22.9 39.6 23.1 31.5 25.2 23.9
Back to top
 
Ability to work with diverse backgrounds NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.24 3.34 3.24 3.36 3.18 3.12 3.26 3.02 3.53 3.21 3.22
    3.6 2.1 3.0 1.5 3.4 8.8 3.4 7.5 1.8 5.3 4.2
1: Not at all %
2: Very Little % 11.2 9.1 18.2 13.4 12.4 11.8 10.2 15.1 7.0 12.0 8.4
3: Somewhat % 42.8 42.0 30.3 32.8 47.4 38.2 43.5 45.3 28.1 39.3 48.4
4: Very Much % 42.4 46.9 48.5 52.2 36.8 41.2 42.9 32.1 63.2 43.3 38.9
Back to top
 

Q Needs being met by NCSU

Intellectual growth needs NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.29 3.45 3.56 3.32 3.23 3.28 3.25 3.02 3.34 3.28 3.23
    1.7 0.8 . . 2.4 . 1.3 7.5 . 2.0 1.0
1: Poorly %
2: Somewhat Adequately % 9.2 6.1 . 9.9 10.4 11.1 10.6 15.1 10.3 8.6 8.3
3: Adequately % 47.6 40.4 44.1 47.9 48.5 50.0 50.3 45.3 44.8 49.3 57.3
4: Very well % 41.5 52.7 55.9 42.3 38.7 38.9 37.7 32.1 44.8 40.1 33.3
Back to top
 
Career training needs NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.02 3.11 3.38 2.90 3.02 3.31 2.89 2.55 3.36 3.05 2.77
    5.6 4.9 . 8.6 5.5 2.8 7.9 11.3 1.7 3.3 8.3
1: Poorly %
2: Somewhat Adequately % 19.1 15.9 11.8 24.3 18.8 11.1 21.2 37.7 15.5 15.8 24.0
3: Adequately % 43.3 42.9 38.2 35.7 43.2 38.9 44.4 35.8 27.6 53.3 50.0
4: Very well % 31.9 36.3 50.0 31.4 32.4 47.2 26.5 15.1 55.2 27.6 17.7
Back to top
 
Personal growth needs NCSU COLLEGE
CALS Design CEP COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.10 3.28 3.24 3.13 2.98 3.00 3.17 2.64 3.07 3.24 3.11
    4.8 2.0 2.9 4.3 6.9 2.9 2.6 15.1 3.4 2.6 5.2
1: Poorly %
2: Somewhat Adequately % 17.2 12.7 11.8 18.6 20.2 22.9 17.2 28.3 19.0 13.2 12.5
3: Adequately % 41.4 40.4 44.1 37.1 41.3 45.7 40.4 34.0 44.8 41.7 47.9
4: Very well % 36.6 44.9 41.2 40.0 31.6 28.6 39.7 22.6 32.8 42.4 34.4
Back to top

 

 

 
For more information on the 2000 Sophomore Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: March, 2001

Download a Microsoft Word Version (Word 6.0 or higher) of this report.
We've named the file .bin so your browser gives you a download window instead of displaying the file. When you download it you can rename it to .doc to indicate that it's a Word file.

Return to 2000 Sophomore Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page