2000 Graduating Senior Survey Data Tables:
Frequency Distributions to Survey Items #1-9
(Faculty Contributions)


This document reports the frequency distributions by gender and race/ethnicity of survey items #1-9 of the 2000 Graduating Senior Survey. A table comparing mean ratings is available on the web.

Exact wording of question: Please evaluate how well faculty members in your major department do each of the following.



Set high expectations for you to learn

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

0.3%

0.5%

0.2%

1.2%

0.1%

2.5%

Fair

4.4%

3.4%

5.3%

8.1%

4.0%

5.0%

Good

49.3%

46.5%

52.0%

46.5%

49.3%

52.5%

Excellent

46.0%

49.7%

42.6%

44.2%

46.6%

40.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


Respect the diverse talents and ways of learning of you and your classmates

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

2.0%

1.3%

2.6%

1.2%

2.1%

1.3%

Fair

19.7%

17.4%

21.8%

38.8%

18.4%

16.3%

Good

53.9%

51.7%

56.0%

48.2%

54.1%

57.5%

Excellent

24.5%

29.6%

19.7%

11.8%

25.4%

25.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


Encourage you to be an actively involved learner

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

1.2%

0.5%

1.8%

1.2%

1.1%

2.5%

Fair

14.7%

12.9%

16.3%

23.3%

13.6%

20.0%

Good

50.1%

47.0%

52.9%

46.5%

50.8%

43.8%

Excellent

34.1%

39.6%

29.0%

29.1%

34.5%

33.8%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


Encourage student-faculty interaction, in and out of the classroom

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

2.3%

1.4%

3.2%

2.3%

2.1%

6.3%

Good

44.6%

42.7%

46.4%

48.8%

44.4%

42.5%

Fair

18.7%

15.8%

21.5%

27.9%

18.0%

18.8%

Excellent

34.3%

40.1%

28.9%

20.9%

35.5%

32.5%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


Give you frequent and prompt feedback

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

0.9%

0.6%

1.2%

1.2%

0.8%

2.5%

Fair

13.8%

10.5%

16.9%

15.3%

13.8%

12.5%

Good

57.1%

55.0%

59.2%

65.9%

57.0%

50.0%

Excellent

28.1%

33.9%

22.7%

17.6%

28.4%

35.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


Encourage you to devote sufficient time and energy to your coursework

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

0.2%

0.0%

0.5%

0.0%

0.2%

1.3%

Fair

6.7%

6.6%

6.8%

4.7%

6.7%

8.8%

Good

50.6%

45.7%

55.2%

61.6%

49.9%

48.8%

Excellent

42.5%

47.7%

37.5%

33.7%

43.2%

41.3%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


Develop opportunities for you to learn cooperatively with fellow students

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

0.9%

0.5%

1.2%

0.0%

0.9%

1.3%

Fair

11.9%

12.6%

11.2%

18.6%

11.6%

8.9%

Good

45.6%

42.7%

48.3%

45.3%

45.5%

46.8%

Excellent

41.7%

44.3%

39.2%

36.0%

42.0%

43.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


Care about your academic success and welfare

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

3.0%

2.1%

3.9%

7.1%

2.8%

2.5%

Fair

19.5%

15.5%

23.3%

24.7%

18.5%

27.5%

Good

45.2%

44.8%

45.5%

47.1%

45.4%

40.0%

Excellent

32.2%

37.6%

27.2%

21.2%

33.2%

30.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top


In general, how would you evaluate your instructors on these eight measures?

 

All

Women

Men

AfAm

White

Other

Poor

0.2%

0.0%

0.5%

0.0%

0.2%

1.3%

Fair

9.0%

7.4%

10.6%

20.9%

8.2%

7.5%

Good

58.2%

53.8%

62.3%

59.3%

57.9%

61.3%

Excellent

32.5%

38.8%

26.6%

19.8%

33.7%

30.0%

View Mean Ratings: Gender/Ethnicity
Back to top



For more information on the 2000 Graduating Senior Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: May, 2001

Download a Microsoft Word Version (Word 6.0 or higher) of this report.
We've named the file .bin so your browser gives you a download window instead of displaying the file. When you download it you can rename it to .doc to indicate that it's a Word file.

Return to 2000 Graduating Senior Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page