1998 First Year Student Survey:
Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile

(Report No. 2)

Introduction

This series of reports presents findings from the 1998 Entering First-Year Student Survey at NC State. Since 1972, Entering Students have been surveyed each year during the New Student Orientation sessions conducted in June and August. Students entering into all 11 undergraduate academic units, including the Agricultural Institute and the First-Year College, are included. Part of this survey contributes to the University of North Carolina General Administration's (UNC-GA) system-wide efforts to evaluate institutional performance.

This introductory report describes the survey's methodology, and provides a demographic profile of survey respondents in comparison to the Fall 1998 First Year class. Specifically, it compares gender, race/ethnicity, and academic unit of survey respondents with the Fall 1998 first-year student population, and presents academic preparation statistics for first-year students. This report is followed by an overview of all students who participated in the First Year Survey. Summary statistics are presented for each survey topic, including student background characteristics, the application process, educational intent and interests, and goals for undergraduate education. Subsequent reports focus on each individual survey topic, and provide gender and racial/ethnic comparisons as well as comparisons between colleges.

Survey Methods

Respondents
A total of 3,321 first-year students attended these orientation sessions and returned completed surveys. Of this total, 3,240 surveys, which represents 85.5 percent of the 3,783 first-year students who were still enrolled in classes 10 days into the fall 1998 semester, were usable for this report. As described below, there are no significant differences between respondents and the first year class with respect to gender, race/ethnicity, or college.

Analyses
Because the response rate is very high (85.5%) and the number of respondents is large (3,783), the margin of error for these results is very low -- under one percent (.27%) at a 95 percent confidence interval. That is, if 26.3 percent of the respondents say they were 'very certain' of their college major, we can be 95 percent sure that the true figure would be between 26.03 percent (26.3 - .27) and 26.57 percent (26.3 + .27) if all first-year students had responded to the survey. The margin of error increases as the sample size decreases, so statements for various subgroups, such as the separate figures reported for whites and African Americans, are less precise than statements based on the total sample. However, given the high response rate (e.g., 345 of 444 African Americans responded to the survey), the margin of error even for small subgroups is close to +1.0 percent at the 95 percent confidence interval.

The data obtained from the first-year orientation sessions were analyzed using standard statistical methods. In analyses not presented in these reports, responses were tested to determine whether there were significant differences between women and men, between white, African American, and other minority students, and between the different colleges. Questions requiring categorical responses were analyzed with chi-square tests, and questions with numerically coded responses were analyzed with either T-tests or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan�s multiple comparison procedure.

These reports attempt to provide a level of detail that makes the data more accessible and interpretable to the novice data user. A primary purpose is to highlight patterns found in responses to related question items or between comparison groups. Such consistencies among items or between groups are usually more important for understanding the data than are the sizes of the differences between individual pairs of ratings or ranks or, to some extent, whether the differences are statistically significant. While some individual small differences might actually be statistically significant, they may not be substantively meaningful. On the other hand, when even relatively small differences yield consistent patterns within a similar series of questions, the results are potentially more telling.

Demographics of the First-Year Class and Survey Respondents

Gender and Race/Ethnicity (Table 2-1)
There are no significant gender or racial/ethnicity differences between the first-year students actually enrolled at NC State and those in the survey population. Women make up about 40 percent of the first-year student population, compared to 41.4 percent of the survey respondents. White students make up 81.3 percent of the first-year student population, 11.7 percent are African American, and 7.0% are other minorities. Among survey respondents, 82.6 percent are white, 10.6 percent African American, and 6.7 percent other minorities.


Table 2-1: Demographics of First-Year Class and Survey Respondents
Racial/Ethnic Group
N
%

First-Year Class

Survey Respondents

Female

Male

Total

Female

Male

Total

African-American
226
6.0%
218
5.8%
444
11.7%
188
5.8%
157
4.8%
345
10.6%
Asian
68
1.8%
101
2.7%
169
4.5%
50
1.5%
86
2.6%
136
4.2%
Hispanic
30
0.8%
30
0.8%
60
1.6%
27
0.8%
22
0.7%
49
1.5%
Native American
14
0.4%
21
0.6%
35
0.9%
13
0.4%
19
0.6%
32
1.0%
White
1,192
31.5%
1,883
49.8%
3,075
81.3%
1,063
32.8%
1,615
49.6%
2,678
82.6%
Total
1,530
40.4%
2,253
59.6%
3,783
100.0%
1,341
41.4%
1,899
58.6%
3,240
100.0%
Note: Some percentage values do not sum to 100.0% due to rounding.
Note: Survey respondents are included in figures for the First-Year Class.

Academic Units
(Table 2-2)
Table 2-2 shows enrollment of first-year students and survey respondents by academic unit. Again there are no significant differences between the first-year students actually enrolled and those responding to the survey. The largest percentage of first-year students enrolled in the College of Engineering (COE, 30.0%) and First-Year College (FYC, 22.1%). The smallest percentages are for the School of Design (Design, 2.2%) and the College of Forest Resources (CFR, 2.8%).

Table 2-2: Classification by Academic Unit
Academic Unit
First-Year Class
Survey Respondents
n
%
n
%
Agriculture and Life Science
567
15.0
505
15.6
Design
83
2.2
74
2.3
Education and Psychology
119
3.1
101
3.1
Engineering
1,134
30.0
1,009
31.1
First-Year College
837
22.1
695
21.5
Forest Resources
106
2.8
88
2.7
Humanities and Social Sciences
274
7.2
231
7.1
Management
259
6.8
210
6.5
Physical and Mathematical Sciences
119
3.1
98
3.0
Textiles
144
3.8
132
4.1
Subtotal
3,642
96.3
3,143
97.0
Agricultural Institute
141
3.7
97
3.0
Total
3,783
100.0
3,240
100.0

Academic Preparation (Tables 2-3 and 2-4)
Table 2-3 presents statistics for fall 1998 first-year bachelor�s degree students. The mean SAT total for all students was 1159, which is similar to the 1997 first-year mean of 1154. The highest average SAT scores were for students enrolled in the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences (PAMS) and in COE. PAMS and COE students also had the highest average Admissions Index (AI) and High School Grade Point Average (HSGPA). Table 4 shows changes in these statistics (SAT total score, AI, and HSGPA) of first-year Bachelor�s students since 1995.


Table 2-3: Fall 1998 First-Year Bachelor�s Students Statistics by Academic Unit
Academic Unit # and % of those responding
SAT Verbal
SAT Math
SAT Total
AI
HS
GPA
Agriculture and Life Sciences (Bachelor�s)
566 (15.0%)
567
573
1141
2.96
3.84
Design
83 (2.2%)
586
611
1197
3.00
3.84
Education and Psychology
119 (3.1%)
561
567
1129
3.01
3.90
Engineering
1,123 (29.7%)
591
638
1229
3.08
4.02
First-Year College
836 (22.1%)
539
557
1096
2.73
3.53
Forest Resources
106 (2.8%)
553
582
1135
2.88
3.74
Humanities and Social Sciences
274 (7.2%)
567
551
1117
2.81
3.61
Management
254 (6.7%)
551
578
1129
2.87
3.69
Physical and Mathematical Sciences
119 (3.1%)
601
646
1246
3.15
4.07
Textiles
144 (3.8%)
552
574
1125
2.90
3.80
Overall
3,624 (95.8%)
567
592
1159
2.93
3.80

Table 2-4: Academic Preparation Statistics:
Trends, 1995-1998
Statistic
1995
1996
1997
1998
SAT total
1061
1149
1154
1159
AI
2.93
2.77
2.84
2.93
HSGPA
3.56
3.65
3.69
3.80


For more information on the 1998 First Year Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: August, 1999

Download a Microsoft Word Version (Word 6.0 or higher) of this report.
We've named the file .bin so your browser gives you a download window instead of displaying the file. When you download it you can rename it to .doc to indicate that it's a Word file.

Return to 1998 First Year Student Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page