NC State logo

North Carolina State University
2005 First-Year Student Survey:
Introduction, Methods, and Student Demographic Profile

Introduction

This series of reports presents findings from the 2005 First-Year Student Survey at NC State. Each year since 1972, students entering the Fall semester have been asked to participate in the survey. The survey is conducted during the New Student Orientation sessions held during the summer months prior to the start of the semester. Students entering into all 11 undergraduate academic units, including the Agricultural Institute and the First Year College, are included. Part of this survey contributes to the University of North Carolina Office of the President's (UNC-OP) system-wide efforts to evaluate institutional performance.

This introductory report describes the survey's methodology and provides a demographic profile of survey respondents in comparison to the Fall 2005 first-year class. It compares gender, race/ethnicity1, and academic unit of survey respondents with the Fall 2005 first-year student population, and presents academic preparation statistics for first-year students. Reports with gender and racial/ethnic comparisons, as well as comparisons between colleges and departments within colleges, are available on the Web. In each report, summary statistics are presented for each survey topic, including student background characteristics, the application process, educational intent and interests, and goals for undergraduate education.

Survey Methods

Respondents

A total of 3,753 usable surveys were completed by enrolled and attending first-year students during New Student Orientation sessions. This figure represents 85.8 percent of the 4,375 first-year students who were still enrolled in classes 10 days into the Fall 2005 semester. No significant differences were found between respondents and the first-year class with respect to gender, race/ethnicity and college.

Analyses

The data obtained from the first-year orientation sessions were analyzed using standard statistical methods. In analyses not presented in these reports, responses were tested to determine whether there were significant differences between women and men, between white, African American, and non-African American minority students, and between the different colleges2.

Because the response rate is very high (85.8%) and the number of incoming students is large (4,375), the margin of error for these results is very low -- under one percent ( +0.2) at a 95 percent confidence interval. That is, if 27.0 percent of the respondents say they were "very certain" of their college major, we can be 95 percent sure that the true figure would be between 26.8 percent (27.0 - 0.2) and 27.2 percent (27.0 + 0.2) if all first-year students had responded to the survey3. The margin of error increases as the sample size decreases, so statements for various subgroups, such as the separate figures reported for whites and African Americans, are less precise than statements based on the total sample. However, given the high response rate (e.g., 367 of 407, or 90.2% of African Americans responded to the survey), the margin of error even for small subgroups is very low (e.g., +0.5 at the 95 percent confidence interval for African Americans).

These reports attempt to provide a level of detail that makes the data more accessible and interpretable to the novice data user. A primary purpose is to highlight patterns found in responses to related question items or between comparison groups. Such consistencies among items or between groups are usually more important for understanding the data than are the sizes of the differences between individual pairs of ratings or ranks or, to some extent, whether the differences are statistically significant. While some individual small differences might be statistically significant, they may not be substantively meaningful. On the other hand, when even relatively small differences yield consistent patterns within a similar series of questions, the results are potentially more telling.

Demographics of the First-Year Class and Survey Respondents

Gender and Race/Ethnicity (Table 1)

There are no significant gender or racial/ethnic differences between the first-year students actually enrolled at NC State and those in the survey population. Women make up 44.0 percent of the first-year population and 43.5 percent of the survey population. Among the first-year student population, 80.6 percent are white, 9.3 percent are African American, and 10.2 percent are non-African American minorities. Among survey respondents, 80.2 percent are white, 9.8 percent African American, and 10.1 percent non-African American minorities.

Table 1: Demographics of First-Year Population and Survey Respondents

Racial/Ethnic Group
N
%
First-Year Population Survey Respondents Response Rate
Women Men Total Women Men Total Women Men Total
White 1,525
33.6%
2,001
46.7%
3,526
80.6%
1,278
34.1%
1,733
46.2%
3,011
80.2%
83.8% 86.6% 85.4%
Native American 14
0.3%
20
0.5%
34
0.8%
14
0.4%
18
0.5%
32
0.9%
100.0% 90.0% 94.1%
African American 226
5.2%
181
4.1%
407
9.3%
207
5.5%
160
4.3%
367
9.8%
91.6% 88.4% 90.2%
Asian 80
1.8%
131
3.0%
211
4.8%
68
1.8%
114
3.0%
182
4.9%
85.0% 87.0% 86.3%
Hispanic 40
0.9%
54
1.2%
94
2.2%
34
0.9%
48
1.3%
82
2.2%
85.0% 88.9% 87.2%
Other 38
0.9%
65
1.5%
103
2.4%
32
0.9%
47
1.3%
79
2.1%
84.2% 72.3% 76.7%
Total 1,923
44.0%
2,452
56.1%
4,375
100.0%
1,633
43.5%
2,120
56.5%
3,753
100.0%
84.9% 86.5% 85.8%
Note: Survey respondents are included in figures for the First-Year class.

Academic Units (Table 2)

Table 2 shows enrollment of first-year students and survey respondents by academic unit. Again there are no significant differences between the first-year student population and survey respondents. The largest percentages of first-year students enrolled in the College of Engineering (26.9%) and First Year College (20.7%). The smallest percentages enrolled in the College of Design (2.1%) and the College of Education (2.4%). Respondents from the Agricultural Institute have been excluded from the analyses presented in this series of reports so that responses reflect the views and circumstances of students pursing baccalaureate degrees.

Table 2: Classification by Academic Unit

Academic Unit First-Year Population Survey Respondents Response
Rate
N % N % %
Agriculture and Life Science 685 15.7% 576 15.3% 84.1%
Design 90 2.1% 83 2.2% 92.2%
Education 105 2.4% 95 2.5% 90.5%
Engineering 1,176 26.9% 1,089 29.0% 92.6%
Natural Resources 110 2.5% 77 2.1% 70.0%
Humanities and Social Sciences 569 13.0% 457 12.2% 80.3%
Physical and Math Sciences 187 4.3% 159 4.2% 85.0%
Textiles 171 3.9% 143 3.8% 83.6%
Management 256 5.9% 218 5.8% 85.2%
First-Year 904 20.7% 763 20.3% 84.4%
Subtotal 4,253 97.2% 3,660 87.7% 86.1%
Agricultural Institute 122 2.8% 93 2.5% 76.2%
Total 4,375 100.0% 3,753 100.0% 85.8%

Academic Preparation (Table 3)

Table 3 presents academic statistics for the 2005 first-year class and survey respondents. High school grade point average was slightly higher among survey respondents than among the first-year student population. There are no significant differences between the first-year class and survey respondents on standardized achievement test scores.

Table 3: Academic Preparation of First-Year Class and Survey Respondents

Academic Preparation Measure First-Year
Population
Survey
Respondents
SAT Verbal 573.4 575.6
SAT Math 606.6 608.5
SAT Total 1180.0 1184.0
High School GPA 4.03 4.06


Endnotes:

1. The term "racial/ethnic" is used throughout these reports to recognize the potentially blurred distinction between the individual terms. In application materials students were requested to identify themselves using the following categories: Caucasian, African American or Black (not of Hispanic origin), Native American Indian or Alaskan, Asian or Pacific Islander, or Hispanic (Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish origin or culture, regardless of race). For analysis purposes, these categories were collapsed into "White," "African American," and "other minorities." (back)
2. Questions requiring categorical responses were analyzed with chi-square tests, and questions with numerically coded responses were analyzed with either T-tests or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan's multiple comparison procedure. Complete results are available from UPA on request. (back)
3. A 95 percent confidence interval denotes the range of values which contains the true population value in 95 of 100 possible random samples of the first-year student population. The margin of error given in the text is conservative since it was calculated assuming a 50/50 response distribution for all questions. Margins of error for individual survey items are likely to be even smaller because response distributions are rarely symmetrical. (back)


For more information on the 2005 First-Year Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: February, 2007

Download a Microsoft Word Version of this report.

Return to 2005 First-Year Student Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page