2001 First-Year Student Survey:
College Comparisons Tables
(Evaluation of the Application Process)

 

Evaluation of the Application Process
 * Number of colleges applied to
* Factors influencing decision to attend NCSU
* Most influential factor in decision to attend
* Satisfaction with the admissions process
* Contacts during the admissions process
* Virtual advising center rating

Evaluation of the Application Process

Q Number of colleges applied to
Number of colleges applied to NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
    25.0 26.5 22.8 19.6 35.9 21.0 13.3 25.5 25.5 16.9 19.2
One %
Two % 25.4 23.4 18.5 19.6 25.7 36.0 23.5 16.3 28.2 24.0 28.2
Three % 22.7 21.6 31.5 33.3 18.6 21.0 28.5 24.5 25.5 29.2 21.9
Four % 14.1 15.8 14.1 17.6 10.3 12.0 17.3 13.3 13.6 13.5 16.9
Five or more % 12.7 12.8 13.0 9.8 9.4 10.0 17.3 20.4 7.3 16.5 13.7
Back to Top

Q Factors influencing decision to attend NC State
Academic reputation NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 4.09 4.08 4.21 4.19 4.21 4.13 3.90 3.99 4.14 3.95 4.05
    0.9 1.2 . . 1.0 . 1.9 3.1 . 0.8 0.2
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 1.7 1.6 2.2 . 1.6 1.0 2.2 2.1 1.8 2.6 1.5
3: Moderate infl. % 18.4 18.9 13.2 15.4 13.1 16.0 24.8 18.6 17.3 22.6 21.9
4: Strong influence % 45.4 44.6 46.2 50.0 43.6 52.0 46.4 45.4 46.4 48.7 45.4
5: Very strong infl. % 33.6 33.7 38.5 34.6 40.7 31.0 24.8 30.9 34.5 25.3 31.0

 
Cost NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.16 3.23 3.15 2.92 3.45 2.94 3.00 3.41 2.99 3.02 2.89
    11.7 9.2 10.5 14.3 7.6 13.3 15.4 7.4 13.5 12.2 17.0
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 16.1 15.4 16.3 14.3 11.6 21.4 17.0 13.7 17.3 20.0 20.0
3: Moderate infl. % 32.0 34.4 36.0 44.9 29.9 32.7 32.0 32.6 35.6 34.9 30.4
4: Strong influence % 25.1 25.8 22.1 18.4 30.0 23.5 23.2 23.2 24.0 20.0 22.4
5: Very strong infl. % 15.0 15.2 15.1 8.2 20.9 9.2 12.4 23.2 9.6 12.9 10.2

 
Location NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.62 3.61 3.42 3.53 3.44 3.45 3.90 3.56 3.83 3.93 3.65
    4.7 6.5 4.3 3.9 5.5 5.1 3.1 7.2 4.6 2.6 3.6
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 9.6 8.3 10.8 11.8 12.8 15.2 5.6 12.4 5.6 4.5 9.2
3: Moderate infl. % 28.1 28.3 36.6 31.4 31.2 29.3 22.2 21.6 21.3 23.3 28.5
4: Strong influence % 34.2 31.7 35.5 33.3 32.4 30.3 36.7 35.1 38.9 36.5 35.7
5: Very strong infl. % 23.4 25.3 12.9 19.6 18.0 20.2 32.4 23.7 29.6 33.1 23.0

 
Size NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.96 2.90 2.92 2.88 2.66 2.94 3.27 3.07 3.31 3.23 3.08
    11.3 13.6 7.6 11.8 16.5 13.0 7.5 10.4 6.6 6.9 7.8
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 21.3 20.3 26.1 25.5 26.6 17.0 11.8 17.7 14.2 17.3 22.0
3: Moderate infl. % 36.4 37.4 38.0 27.5 36.3 42.0 39.9 38.5 30.2 35.0 35.3
4: Strong influence % 22.1 19.9 22.8 33.3 15.3 19.0 28.0 20.8 39.6 27.7 24.6
5: Very strong infl. % 8.8 8.7 5.4 2.0 5.3 9.0 12.8 12.5 9.4 13.1 10.3

 
Availability of program NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.80 4.05 4.30 3.85 3.98 4.02 3.47 4.01 4.11 3.39 3.52
    3.1 1.2 1.1 4.2 2.2 5.1 4.8 7.4 2.8 6.1 3.2
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 8.1 6.5 3.2 6.3 6.1 3.1 9.8 5.3 2.8 9.9 12.7
3: Moderate infl. % 26.4 20.6 17.0 22.9 19.9 22.4 37.5 13.7 21.1 37.3 34.1
4: Strong influence % 30.6 29.5 22.3 33.3 34.4 23.5 29.5 26.3 27.5 32.7 29.2
5: Very strong infl. % 31.7 42.2 56.4 33.3 37.3 45.9 18.4 47.4 45.9 14.1 20.8

 
Recommended NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.34 3.37 3.39 3.37 3.28 3.57 3.36 3.09 3.68 3.38 3.31
    9.2 9.5 7.8 10.2 9.4 5.4 9.0 14.6 5.8 8.6 9.6
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 15.6 13.9 14.4 22.4 16.6 16.3 14.3 18.0 11.5 14.9 15.9
3: Moderate infl. % 28.1 27.8 24.4 12.2 29.3 25.0 29.9 28.1 20.2 29.0 28.9
4: Strong influence % 26.3 28.0 37.8 30.6 25.3 22.8 25.2 22.5 33.7 25.1 25.5
5: Very strong infl. % 20.8 20.9 15.6 24.5 19.3 30.4 21.6 16.9 28.8 22.4 20.1

 
Number of hours transferred/credited NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.18 2.18 1.95 2.30 2.11 2.43 2.24 2.61 2.24 2.18 2.16
    34.6 37.3 40.0 22.2 38.6 14.9 31.5 25.0 34.8 32.8 32.5
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 29.6 24.7 31.7 48.1 29.0 40.4 30.9 17.2 30.4 29.7 32.5
3: Moderate infl. % 23.5 25.3 23.3 11.1 18.3 31.9 24.7 40.6 17.4 27.3 25.4
4: Strong influence % 8.4 8.2 3.3 14.8 10.7 12.8 8.0 6.3 10.9 7.0 5.8
5: Very strong infl. % 4.0 4.5 1.7 3.7 3.3 . 4.9 10.9 6.5 3.1 3.8

 
Level of support for my intended major NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.77 3.92 4.29 3.90 4.18 3.81 3.27 4.20 3.99 3.35 3.31
    4.4 3.1 2.2 2.0 1.8 3.1 6.8 3.1 3.8 4.7 8.6
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 9.2 8.6 5.6 5.9 3.9 9.3 14.0 2.1 6.7 14.1 15.0
3: Moderate infl. % 23.8 19.9 10.0 25.5 15.0 21.6 39.4 14.4 19.0 35.7 31.3
4: Strong influence % 30.1 30.2 25.6 33.3 33.2 35.1 24.4 33.0 27.6 32.9 26.8
5: Very strong infl. % 32.6 38.2 56.7 33.3 46.1 30.9 15.3 47.4 42.9 12.5 18.3

 
Facilities and resources available NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.66 3.81 3.75 3.65 3.71 3.76 3.56 4.02 4.07 3.49 3.48
    3.4 2.6 4.3 3.8 3.2 2.0 2.8 2.0 1.9 4.2 4.7
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 8.0 5.5 3.2 7.7 7.6 6.1 10.3 4.1 2.8 10.3 10.3
3: Moderate infl. % 29.3 26.3 34.4 32.7 26.5 29.3 31.9 16.3 18.5 33.5 34.6
4: Strong influence % 37.3 39.6 29.0 30.8 39.9 39.4 37.8 44.9 39.8 36.1 32.9
5: Very strong infl. % 21.9 26.1 29.0 25.0 22.7 23.2 17.2 32.7 37.0 16.0 17.5

 
Scholarships/financial aid available NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.84 2.97 2.46 3.85 2.85 3.24 2.89 3.07 2.75 2.62 2.67
    20.7 17.7 28.6 8.7 20.7 11.5 17.7 18.8 23.5 27.3 23.0
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 23.3 19.1 28.6 8.7 23.9 23.0 25.4 16.5 23.5 24.2 25.4
3: Moderate infl. % 24.7 29.4 24.3 10.9 23.2 20.7 25.0 27.1 22.4 23.7 25.4
4: Strong influence % 14.4 16.6 5.7 32.6 14.2 19.5 13.8 14.1 15.3 8.8 14.1
5: Very strong infl. % 16.9 17.2 12.9 39.1 18.0 25.3 18.1 23.5 15.3 16.0 12.0

 
Campus visit prior to orientation NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.20 3.26 3.15 3.45 2.95 3.35 3.39 3.13 3.40 3.39 3.27
    9.8 10.6 8.3 2.1 11.5 11.3 9.5 11.7 7.7 5.6 9.4
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 15.9 13.4 16.7 21.3 21.3 13.8 9.9 14.3 12.1 13.0 14.3
3: Moderate infl. % 33.4 33.2 36.9 23.4 37.0 23.8 30.6 36.4 34.1 34.0 30.7
4: Strong influence % 26.9 25.2 27.4 36.2 21.0 31.3 31.7 24.7 25.3 31.6 31.1
5: Very strong infl. % 14.1 17.6 10.7 17.0 9.2 20.0 18.3 13.0 20.9 15.8 14.6

 
Contact with a current student NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.10 3.06 2.81 3.49 2.90 3.01 3.32 3.24 3.31 3.14 3.22
    13.9 16.5 18.2 2.4 16.2 21.0 12.9 12.1 13.3 9.9 11.1
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 17.9 14.9 22.1 17.1 21.8 17.3 12.9 19.7 15.6 22.2 15.4
3: Moderate infl. % 27.9 30.6 24.7 31.7 28.3 19.8 24.9 22.7 24.4 26.9 29.5
4: Strong influence % 25.6 22.6 31.2 26.8 23.3 23.5 28.5 22.7 20.0 26.4 29.0
5: Very strong infl. % 14.8 15.4 3.9 22.0 10.4 18.5 20.9 22.7 26.7 14.6 15.1

 
Contact with a faculty or staff member NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.48 2.60 2.60 2.69 2.30 2.57 2.59 3.08 2.58 2.33 2.45
    28.0 25.3 21.0 25.7 32.1 22.2 26.1 14.5 31.1 26.5 29.7
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 24.9 24.9 22.6 20.0 27.3 27.0 20.9 21.0 16.2 29.9 24.5
3: Moderate infl. % 26.1 23.3 40.3 22.9 24.4 31.7 29.4 21.0 27.0 31.6 24.7
4: Strong influence % 13.5 17.4 8.1 22.9 11.1 9.5 14.4 29.0 14.9 7.7 13.5
5: Very strong infl. % 7.5 9.1 8.1 8.6 5.1 9.5 9.2 14.5 10.8 4.3 7.6

 
Contact with a graduate NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.75 2.91 2.51 2.48 2.57 2.90 2.96 2.76 3.03 2.99 2.69
    21.9 19.9 23.7 22.2 25.5 17.2 18.1 20.0 18.3 15.3 23.9
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 22.0 19.2 28.8 29.6 23.6 24.1 19.9 24.4 18.3 20.4 21.9
3: Moderate infl. % 26.3 25.1 25.4 29.6 26.7 25.9 28.1 24.4 25.4 29.3 25.3
4: Strong influence % 18.7 22.3 16.9 14.8 17.0 17.2 15.8 22.2 18.3 19.7 19.4
5: Very strong infl. % 11.1 13.6 5.1 3.7 7.2 15.5 18.1 8.9 19.7 15.3 9.6

 
Letter from outside Admissions Office NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.10 2.19 1.89 2.36 2.00 2.20 2.20 2.39 2.34 2.06 2.03
    39.1 37.2 39.3 27.3 43.0 31.1 36.7 33.8 31.2 39.7 40.8
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 28.0 24.0 37.5 30.3 27.3 33.8 25.5 25.4 27.3 27.4 31.1
3: Moderate infl. % 20.8 26.7 19.6 24.2 19.2 21.6 23.5 19.7 26.0 23.3 15.9
4: Strong influence % 8.2 7.4 1.8 15.2 7.8 10.8 9.7 9.9 7.8 6.2 8.8
5: Very strong infl. % 3.9 4.7 1.8 3.0 2.7 2.7 4.6 11.3 7.8 3.4 3.5

 
Attendance at a College Fair NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.06 2.08 2.07 2.10 1.95 2.06 2.11 2.11 2.15 1.97 2.15
    38.8 39.8 32.6 27.6 43.3 39.2 38.9 37.0 33.3 38.9 34.8
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 28.8 25.6 34.9 37.9 28.0 23.5 28.2 28.3 31.7 32.7 29.9
3: Moderate infl. % 22.4 24.0 25.6 31.0 20.2 31.4 18.3 23.9 25.0 22.1 22.9
4: Strong influence % 8.1 8.1 7.0 3.4 7.1 3.9 12.2 8.7 6.7 4.4 10.2
5: Very strong infl. % 1.9 2.4 . . 1.4 2.0 2.3 2.2 3.3 1.8 2.2

 
Publications from NC State NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.27 2.32 2.30 2.37 2.11 2.35 2.35 2.28 2.30 2.27 2.37
    28.8 27.2 22.7 15.8 34.6 31.1 27.6 28.0 29.3 29.3 24.3
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 29.1 28.0 39.4 47.4 28.5 25.7 26.7 26.7 26.8 28.3 30.4
3: Moderate infl. % 30.3 31.7 24.2 21.1 29.3 24.3 30.2 36.0 30.5 30.9 31.8
4: Strong influence % 10.1 11.6 12.1 15.8 6.5 14.9 13.8 8.0 11.0 9.4 11.1
5: Very strong infl. % 1.7 1.3 1.5 . 1.1 4.1 1.7 1.3 2.4 2.1 2.4

 
Extracurricular opportunities NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.93 3.01 2.55 3.07 2.81 3.02 3.03 2.86 2.78 3.03 3.01
    14.8 13.2 23.8 13.0 15.3 12.8 12.6 20.9 22.6 13.0 14.1
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 19.3 15.5 23.8 15.2 23.6 18.6 16.9 17.6 18.3 17.4 18.4
3: Moderate infl. % 33.3 37.9 29.8 34.8 32.0 30.2 37.4 30.8 29.0 34.3 31.5
4: Strong influence % 23.4 24.0 19.0 26.1 23.2 30.2 21.6 16.5 18.3 24.3 24.7
5: Very strong infl. % 9.2 9.4 3.6 10.9 6.0 8.1 11.5 14.3 11.8 10.9 11.3

 
Other NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 4.34 4.59 4.70 4.33 4.29 4.44 4.31 4.89 4.00 4.12 4.23
    5.4 4.1 . . 7.1 11.1 . . 11.1 . 8.7
1: Very weak infl. %
2: Weak influence % 2.0 2.0 10.0 . 1.2 . 3.4 . . 4.0 1.4
3: Moderate infl. % 10.0 2.0 . 16.7 10.7 . 13.8 . 22.2 20.0 11.6
4: Strong influence % 18.4 14.3 . 33.3 17.9 11.1 31.0 11.1 11.1 36.0 14.5
5: Very strong infl. % 64.2 77.6 90.0 50.0 63.1 77.8 51.7 88.9 55.6 40.0 63.8
Back to Top

Q Most influential factor in decision to attend NCSU
Most influential factor NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
    25.0 23.3 14.8 15.6 25.7 21.1 24.2 19.8 23.8 23.3 29.1
Academic reputation %
Cost % 4.6 4.9 3.4 . 7.1 . 3.7 7.0 1.9 4.1 3.0
Location % 9.9 7.1 2.3 6.7 4.9 9.5 20.5 5.8 8.6 20.4 12.1
Size % 0.9 0.4 1.1 . 0.5 1.1 2.3 1.2 1.0 2.0 0.8
Availability of program % 11.5 17.1 27.3 15.6 12.3 20.0 4.7 18.6 11.4 5.7 7.6
Recommended % 6.1 6.0 3.4 6.7 3.9 11.6 8.1 2.3 10.5 11.4 5.9
Number of hours transferred/credited % 0.4 0.2 . . 0.3 . 0.3 . 1.0 . 0.7
Level of support for my intended major % 16.9 19.7 25.0 15.6 27.6 12.6 4.4 17.4 17.1 8.6 9.4
Facilities and resources available % 4.2 3.6 4.5 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.7 7.6 3.3 4.0
Scholarships/financial aid available % 5.8 5.6 8.0 20.0 6.1 9.5 7.4 10.5 3.8 5.3 3.2
Campus visit prior to orientation % 3.5 3.0 1.1 4.4 1.5 3.2 5.7 2.3 2.9 6.1 5.0
Contact with a current student % 2.9 2.1 . 4.4 1.1 3.2 5.7 3.5 2.9 3.3 4.3
Contact with a faculty or staff member % 0.5 0.6 . 4.4 0.3 . . . 1.9 . 0.8
Contact with a graduate % 0.7 0.4 1.1 . 0.7 1.1 1.3 . . 2.4 0.4
Letter from someone other than admissions % 0.1 0.4 . . 0.1 . . . . . .
Attendance at a College Fair % 0.1 0.2 . . 0.1 . 0.3 . . 0.4 .
Publications from NC State % 0.1 . . . . . 0.3 . . . 0.1
Extracurricular opportunities % 1.5 0.9 . . 0.5 . 2.7 . 1.9 1.6 3.3
Acceptance into First Year College % 2.0 . 2.3 . 0.2 . 0.3 1.2 . 0.4 7.2
Other % 3.3 4.5 5.7 2.2 2.7 3.2 3.7 5.8 3.8 1.6 3.0
Back to Top

Q Satisfaction with the admissions process
Satisfaction with university admissions NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.40 3.40 3.42 3.35 3.43 3.35 3.45 3.39 3.46 3.50 3.33
    1.0 1.6 . . 0.6 2.0 0.9 . 1.8 1.5 1.0
1: Very dissatisfied %
2: Moderately dissatisfied % 5.6 5.2 3.2 9.6 4.6 2.0 5.2 10.3 0.9 5.6 7.9
3: Moderately satisfied % 45.3 44.6 51.6 46.2 46.2 55.1 41.7 40.2 46.4 34.5 48.2
4: Very satisfied % 48.1 48.6 45.2 44.2 48.6 40.8 52.1 49.5 50.9 58.4 42.9

 
Satisfaction with dept. admissions NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 3.37 3.36 3.41 3.38 3.41 3.36 3.41 3.53 3.55 3.52 3.21
    1.0 0.8 . 1.9 0.6 . 0.6 . 2.8 0.8 1.8
1: Very dissatisfied %
2: Moderately dissatisfied % 6.0 7.4 8.6 3.8 4.2 4.2 7.0 3.2 3.7 3.9 8.6
3: Moderately satisfied % 47.8 47.0 41.9 48.1 49.1 55.2 43.0 40.4 29.0 38.2 56.2
4: Very satisfied % 45.3 44.8 49.5 46.2 46.1 40.6 49.4 56.4 64.5 57.1 33.4

 
Satisfaction with financial aid process NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
  Mean 2.83 2.87 2.66 3.00 2.77 2.81 2.88 2.75 2.97 2.90 2.84
    8.1 7.6 15.1 3.0 9.3 10.1 7.2 7.5 4.6 6.9 7.3
1: Very dissatisfied %
2: Moderately dissatisfied % 23.0 21.9 22.6 24.2 23.4 18.8 19.0 26.9 18.5 26.9 24.3
3: Moderately satisfied % 46.9 46.1 43.4 42.4 48.5 50.7 52.8 49.3 52.3 35.9 45.1
4: Very satisfied % 22.1 24.4 18.9 30.3 18.8 20.3 21.0 16.4 24.6 30.3 23.3
Back to Top


Q Contacts during the admissions process
Call from faculty/staff NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
    81.1 83.3 70.2 67.3 81.6 74.0 84.0 64.3 75.5 81.0 83.9
No %
Yes % 18.9 16.7 29.8 32.7 18.4 26.0 16.0 35.7 24.5 19.0 16.1

 
Call from current student NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
    83.5 85.5 83.0 57.7 84.1 70.0 85.6 78.6 64.5 85.1 86.7
No %
Yes % 16.5 14.5 17.0 42.3 15.9 30.0 14.4 21.4 35.5 14.9 13.3

 
Call from graduate NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
    92.9 93.7 94.7 92.3 91.2 91.0 95.7 93.9 91.8 90.3 94.5
No %
Yes % 7.1 6.3 5.3 7.7 8.8 9.0 4.3 6.1 8.2 9.7 5.5

 
Letter from outside Admissions Office NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
    32.3 31.3 30.9 23.1 29.1 26.0 30.4 22.4 23.6 34.7 40.4
No %
Yes % 67.7 68.7 69.1 76.9 70.9 74.0 69.6 77.6 76.4 65.3 59.6
Back to Top

Q Virtual advising center rating
Viritual advising center rating NCSU College
CALS Design CED COE CNR CHASS PAMS COT COM FYC
    0.3 0.6 . . 0.6 . 0.3 . . . 0.1
Poor %
Fair % 2.8 2.6 5.4 3.8 2.6 1.0 3.1 1.0 . 3.0 3.6
Good % 20.2 19.7 14.1 11.5 18.8 27.0 22.1 22.4 16.4 19.8 22.4
Excellent % 8.1 8.2 6.5 13.5 5.7 6.0 11.0 4.1 10.0 7.5 10.2
Know about/did not use % 11.6 13.9 8.7 11.5 10.9 13.0 12.0 13.3 14.5 10.4 10.9
Did not know about % 56.9 55.1 65.2 59.6 61.3 53.0 51.5 59.2 59.1 59.3 52.8
Back to Top


For more information on the 2001 First-Year Student Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: December, 2001

Download a Microsoft Excel Version of college comparisons for all survey items.
Note: Set page size of Excel file to landscape to print with accurate page breaks.

Return to 2001 First-Year Student Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page