North Carolina State University
Campus Climate Survey Trends (Graduate)
Section E: Campus Climate

Tables of Results
by Student Demographic Profile

The NC State University Campus Climate Survey was conducted in two years: 2004 and 2010. This page shows trends in survey responses for items included in both survey waves, broken down by student demographic profile.

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Faculty respect for students	NC State support for various student groups
Student respect for faculty	Grad program support for various student groups
Friendships between students with different backgrounds

Section E: Campus Climate

Faculty respect for grad students in general

Faculty respect for grad students in general	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	3.2	31.0%	58.4%	8.6%	2.0%	1,294
2004
2010	3.3	42.4%	49.0%	7.2%	1.3%	1,193

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		3.2	30.8%	58.5%	8.9%	1.9%	621
Male	2004
	2010	3.3	42.6%	49.4%	6.3%	1.8%	559
Female	2004	3.2	31.2%	58.4%	8.3%	2.1%	673
	2010	3.3	42.3%	48.7%	8.0%	0.9%	634

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.0	23.5%	58.0%	13.6%	4.9%	81
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.2	31.6%	55.7%	11.4%	1.3%	79
Asian	2004	3.1	22.2%	66.2%	11.1%	0.5%	198
	2010	3.4	44.7%	50.0%	4.3%	1.0%	302
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.2	29.7%	59.5%	8.1%	2.7%	37
	2010	3.5	51.6%	45.2%	3.2%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.2	33.5%	57.5%	7.2%	1.8%	880
	2010	3.3	42.2%	48.0%	8.2%	1.6%	742

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		3.2	32.0%	57.4%	8.5%	2.1%	1,163
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.3	40.9%	48.9%	8.7%	1.5%	843
International student	2004	3.1	22.1%	67.2%	9.2%	1.5%	131
	2010	3.4	46.0%	49.4%	3.7%	0.9%	350

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.0	25.9%	55.7%	15.5%	2.8%	316
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.3	40.2%	48.5%	8.9%	2.4%	336
Middle class	2004	3.2	29.6%	61.7%	6.9%	1.8%	666
	2010	3.3	42.4%	49.9%	6.7%	0.9%	549
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.3	40.0%	53.7%	4.7%	1.7%	300
	2010	3.4	44.2%	48.3%	6.5%	1.0%	292

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.2	32.3%	57.0%	8.1%	2.7%	186
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.4	45.7%	48.0%	4.7%	1.6%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.2	30.8%	58.6%	8.6%	1.9%	1,099
	2010	3.3	41.8%	49.3%	7.7%	1.2%	1,041

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.2	31.6%	58.4%	8.1%	1.9%	1,216
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.3	43.1%	48.7%	7.0%	1.2%	1,068
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.0	20.0%	60.0%	16.4%	3.6%	55
	2010	3.2	35.9%	51.6%	10.9%	1.6%	64

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.2	31.2%	58.7%	8.2%	1.9%	1,229
No disability	2004
	2010	3.3	43.3%	48.6%	6.8%	1.3%	1,097
Disability	2004	2.9	25.0%	50.0%	18.8%	6.3%	48
	2010	3.2	32.3%	54.2%	11.5%	2.1%	96

Faculty respect for grad students in general		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		3.2	30.7%	58.5%	8.7%	2.1%	1,068
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.3	42.9%	49.2%	6.4%	1.4%	1,042
Non-Traditional	2004	3.2	32.3%	58.0%	8.0%	1.8%	226
	2010	3.3	39.1%	47.7%	12.6%	0.7%	151

Faculty respect for minority grad students

Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	3.1	28.6%	57.6%	10.9%	2.9%	1,289
2004
2010	3.3	40.0%	49.7%	7.9%	2.4%	1,186

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		3.1	29.3%	57.4%	11.2%	2.1%	617
Male	2004
	2010	3.3	41.2%	50.0%	6.8%	2.0%	558
Female	2004	3.1	28.0%	57.9%	10.6%	3.6%	672
	2010	3.2	38.9%	49.5%	8.9%	2.7%	628

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		2.5	11.1%	48.1%	23.5%	17.3%	81
African American/Black	2004
	2010	2.8	20.3%	50.6%	21.5%	7.6%	79
Asian	2004	3.0	17.2%	64.1%	17.2%	1.5%	198
	2010	3.3	40.6%	49.5%	7.9%	2.0%	303
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.0	24.3%	54.1%	16.2%	5.4%	37
	2010	3.4	48.4%	41.9%	9.7%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.2	32.3%	58.6%	7.7%	1.4%	875
	2010	3.3	41.5%	49.8%	6.7%	2.0%	735

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		3.1	30.1%	56.2%	10.6%	3.0%	1,158
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.3	39.2%	50.5%	7.9%	2.4%	835
International student	2004	3.0	15.3%	70.2%	13.0%	1.5%	131
	2010	3.3	41.9%	47.9%	8.0%	2.3%	351

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.0	23.8%	54.3%	16.8%	5.1%	315
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.2	36.5%	49.1%	9.9%	4.5%	334
Middle class	2004	3.1	27.6%	61.1%	8.9%	2.4%	666
	2010	3.3	40.6%	50.6%	6.8%	2.0%	545
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.2	36.4%	53.2%	8.8%	1.7%	297
	2010	3.3	42.3%	49.1%	7.9%	0.7%	291

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.1	29.6%	55.9%	11.3%	3.2%	186
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.2	37.0%	51.2%	9.4%	2.4%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.1	28.5%	57.9%	10.8%	2.8%	1,095
	2010	3.3	40.2%	49.6%	7.8%	2.3%	1,034

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.1	29.3%	57.8%	10.0%	2.9%	1,212
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.3	40.4%	50.1%	7.6%	1.9%	1,062
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.9	14.5%	58.2%	25.5%	1.8%	55
	2010	3.1	36.5%	46.0%	11.1%	6.3%	63

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.1	28.8%	58.0%	10.5%	2.7%	1,225
No disability	2004
	2010	3.3	40.5%	49.3%	8.2%	2.1%	1,090
Disability	2004	2.9	22.9%	50.0%	18.8%	8.3%	48
	2010	3.2	34.4%	55.2%	5.2%	5.2%	96

Faculty respect for minority grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		3.1	28.2%	57.9%	10.8%	3.0%	1,063
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.3	41.0%	49.3%	7.6%	2.0%	1,036
Non-Traditional	2004	3.2	30.5%	56.2%	11.1%	2.2%	226
	2010	3.1	32.7%	52.7%	10.0%	4.7%	150

Undergrad respect for minority TAs

Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	2.6	10.1%	52.2%	29.5%	8.2%	1,246
2004
2010	2.9	22.6%	52.2%	20.5%	4.7%	1,139

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		2.6	11.2%	49.9%	29.7%	9.2%	607
Male	2004
	2010	3.0	23.6%	52.3%	20.4%	3.7%	539
Female	2004	2.7	9.1%	54.3%	29.4%	7.2%	639
	2010	2.9	21.7%	52.0%	20.7%	5.7%	600

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		2.5	5.1%	48.7%	33.3%	12.8%	78
African American/Black	2004
	2010	2.7	12.9%	52.9%	28.6%	5.7%	70
Asian	2004	2.6	8.2%	49.2%	34.4%	8.2%	195
	2010	3.0	27.3%	53.0%	16.7%	3.0%	300
Hispanic/Latino	2004	2.6	11.4%	45.7%	31.4%	11.4%	35
	2010	3.0	25.8%	51.6%	22.6%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	2.7	10.8%	53.9%	28.1%	7.3%	841
	2010	2.9	21.5%	52.1%	20.8%	5.6%	701

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		2.7	10.7%	52.1%	28.8%	8.3%	1,118
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	2.9	20.5%	51.8%	22.4%	5.3%	794
International student	2004	2.5	4.7%	52.3%	35.9%	7.0%	128
	2010	3.0	27.2%	53.0%	16.2%	3.5%	345

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		2.5	7.3%	49.5%	32.6%	10.6%	301
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	2.9	21.2%	51.3%	22.2%	5.4%	316
Middle class	2004	2.7	9.0%	55.3%	28.1%	7.6%	644
	2010	2.9	23.3%	52.3%	19.7%	4.8%	524
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	2.7	15.5%	47.6%	30.0%	6.9%	290
	2010	2.9	22.6%	51.9%	21.2%	4.2%	283

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		2.6	9.7%	54.0%	27.8%	8.5%	176
First generation student	2004
	2010	2.9	22.1%	52.5%	21.3%	4.1%	122
Not first generation	2004	2.6	10.2%	51.8%	29.8%	8.2%	1,062
	2010	2.9	22.8%	51.8%	20.7%	4.7%	995

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		2.6	10.1%	52.7%	29.3%	7.9%	1,173
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.0	23.9%	51.4%	20.7%	3.9%	1,019
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.4	5.9%	39.2%	39.2%	15.7%	51
	2010	2.7	9.8%	57.4%	21.3%	11.5%	61

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status*		2.7	10.0%	52.9%	29.4%	7.8%	1,185
No disability	2004
	2010	2.9	23.3%	51.8%	20.2%	4.7%	1,050
Disability	2004	2.3	13.3%	28.9%	35.6%	22.2%	45
	2010	2.8	13.5%	56.2%	24.7%	5.6%	89

Undergrad respect for minority TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		2.6	9.0%	52.0%	30.7%	8.3%	1,040
Traditional	2004
	2010	2.9	23.0%	51.1%	21.0%	4.9%	1,004
Non-Traditional	2004	2.8	15.5%	52.9%	23.8%	7.8%	206
	2010	2.9	19.3%	60.0%	17.0%	3.7%	135

Undergrad respect for female TAs

Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	2.8	12.0%	58.6%	25.2%	4.2%	1,245
2004
2010	3.1	27.1%	57.4%	13.7%	1.8%	1,142

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		2.8	12.9%	58.9%	24.9%	3.3%	606
Male	2004
	2010	3.1	28.4%	57.7%	12.7%	1.1%	542
Female	2004	2.8	11.1%	58.4%	25.5%	5.0%	639
	2010	3.1	25.8%	57.2%	14.7%	2.3%	600

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		2.7	5.1%	66.7%	21.8%	6.4%	78
African American/Black	2004
	2010	2.9	12.9%	67.1%	17.1%	2.9%	70
Asian	2004	2.8	9.2%	60.5%	29.7%	0.5%	195
	2010	3.2	28.7%	59.7%	10.7%	1.0%	300
Hispanic/Latino	2004	2.8	14.7%	58.8%	20.6%	5.9%	34
	2010	3.3	40.0%	46.7%	13.3%	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	2.8	13.2%	57.9%	24.7%	4.2%	841
	2010	3.1	27.7%	56.4%	14.1%	1.8%	704

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		2.8	12.5%	58.1%	24.8%	4.6%	1,117
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.1	25.9%	56.5%	15.5%	2.0%	798
International student	2004	2.8	7.0%	63.3%	28.9%	0.8%	128
	2010	3.2	29.7%	59.6%	9.6%	1.2%	344

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		2.6	8.0%	56.1%	28.2%	7.6%	301
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.0	25.2%	55.5%	16.1%	3.2%	317
Middle class	2004	2.8	11.5%	62.0%	23.6%	3.0%	644
	2010	3.1	28.9%	57.2%	12.5%	1.3%	526
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	2.8	17.3%	53.3%	26.3%	3.1%	289
	2010	3.1	25.8%	59.0%	14.1%	1.1%	283

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		2.8	10.8%	58.0%	28.4%	2.8%	176
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.1	25.8%	59.2%	14.2%	0.8%	120
Not first generation	2004	2.8	12.2%	58.6%	24.8%	4.4%	1,061
	2010	3.1	27.4%	57.0%	13.9%	1.7%	1,000

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		2.8	12.0%	59.0%	25.0%	3.9%	1,172
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.1	28.0%	57.1%	13.6%	1.3%	1,022
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.5	7.8%	45.1%	37.3%	9.8%	51
	2010	2.9	16.4%	62.3%	18.0%	3.3%	61

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status*		2.8	11.9%	59.4%	25.0%	3.7%	1,184
No disability	2004
	2010	3.1	27.6%	57.8%	12.8%	1.8%	1,050
Disability	2004	2.4	13.3%	33.3%	35.6%	17.8%	45
	2010	2.9	20.7%	53.3%	25.0%	1.1%	92

Undergrad respect for female TAs		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age*		2.8	11.3%	59.4%	25.0%	4.3%	1,040
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.1	27.8%	56.6%	13.7%	1.9%	1,007
Non-Traditional	2004	2.8	15.6%	54.6%	26.3%	3.4%	205
	2010	3.1	21.5%	63.7%	14.1%	0.7%	135

Back to Top

Grad student respect for faculty

Grad student respect for faculty	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	3.2	30.9%	61.5%	6.5%	1.1%	1,288
2004
2010	3.3	39.3%	54.6%	5.5%	0.7%	1,191

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		3.2	32.6%	59.0%	7.1%	1.3%	617
Male	2004
	2010	3.3	39.8%	54.3%	4.7%	1.3%	558
Female	2004	3.2	29.4%	63.8%	6.0%	0.9%	671
	2010	3.3	38.9%	54.8%	6.2%	0.2%	633

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.2	27.5%	63.8%	7.5%	1.3%	80
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.2	27.8%	64.6%	6.3%	1.3%	79
Asian	2004	3.2	27.3%	64.6%	7.6%	0.5%	198
	2010	3.4	42.9%	53.5%	3.3%	0.3%	303
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.3	33.3%	61.1%	5.6%	.	36
	2010	3.4	41.9%	51.6%	6.5%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.2	31.5%	62.1%	5.5%	0.9%	876
	2010	3.3	39.1%	54.5%	5.7%	0.7%	739

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		3.2	31.2%	61.0%	6.7%	1.1%	1,158
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.3	37.6%	55.5%	6.1%	0.8%	840
International student	2004	3.2	28.5%	66.2%	4.6%	0.8%	130
	2010	3.4	43.3%	52.4%	4.0%	0.3%	351

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.1	25.9%	62.0%	10.5%	1.6%	313
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.3	37.6%	53.4%	7.8%	1.2%	335
Middle class	2004	3.2	30.5%	63.5%	4.7%	1.4%	665
	2010	3.3	39.2%	55.3%	4.9%	0.5%	548
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.3	37.2%	56.7%	6.0%	.	298
	2010	3.4	40.8%	54.8%	4.1%	0.3%	292

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.2	30.3%	60.5%	7.6%	1.6%	185
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.4	40.9%	54.3%	4.7%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	3.2	31.0%	61.7%	6.3%	1.0%	1,094
	2010	3.3	39.0%	54.8%	5.6%	0.7%	1,039

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.2	30.7%	61.9%	6.3%	1.1%	1,210
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.3	39.8%	54.2%	5.5%	0.5%	1,066
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.2	32.7%	56.4%	9.1%	1.8%	55
	2010	3.3	40.6%	54.7%	3.1%	1.6%	64

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.2	31.2%	61.6%	6.1%	1.1%	1,223
No disability	2004
	2010	3.3	40.1%	53.8%	5.4%	0.7%	1,095
Disability	2004	3.0	22.9%	58.3%	18.8%	.	48
	2010	3.2	30.2%	63.5%	6.3%	.	96

Grad student respect for faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		3.2	30.5%	62.2%	6.2%	1.1%	1,064
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.3	40.2%	53.4%	5.7%	0.7%	1,041
Non-Traditional	2004	3.2	33.0%	58.0%	8.0%	0.9%	224
	2010	3.3	32.7%	62.7%	4.0%	0.7%	150

Grad student respect for minority faculty

Grad student respect for minority faculty	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	3.2	29.7%	60.0%	9.2%	1.1%	1,274
2004
2010	3.3	38.1%	53.6%	6.9%	1.4%	1,184

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		3.2	30.6%	58.7%	10.0%	0.8%	612
Male	2004
	2010	3.3	38.1%	55.2%	5.6%	1.1%	554
Female	2004	3.2	28.9%	61.3%	8.5%	1.4%	662
	2010	3.3	38.1%	52.2%	8.1%	1.6%	630

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		2.8	17.5%	53.8%	22.5%	6.3%	80
African American/Black	2004
	2010	2.9	20.3%	55.7%	21.5%	2.5%	79
Asian	2004	3.1	27.6%	59.7%	12.8%	.	196
	2010	3.3	39.7%	53.0%	6.3%	1.0%	302
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.2	32.4%	58.8%	5.9%	2.9%	34
	2010	3.4	45.2%	48.4%	6.5%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.2	30.8%	62.1%	6.7%	0.5%	867
	2010	3.3	39.2%	54.4%	5.0%	1.4%	735

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		3.2	29.8%	59.9%	9.1%	1.2%	1,146
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.3	37.2%	54.3%	7.2%	1.3%	834
International student	2004	3.2	28.1%	61.7%	10.2%	.	128
	2010	3.3	40.3%	52.0%	6.3%	1.4%	350

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.1	25.1%	57.3%	15.3%	2.3%	307
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.3	37.5%	52.0%	9.0%	1.5%	333
Middle class	2004	3.2	28.0%	63.7%	7.3%	1.1%	661
	2010	3.3	37.4%	54.3%	6.6%	1.7%	545
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.3	38.5%	54.7%	6.8%	.	296
	2010	3.3	39.3%	54.8%	5.2%	0.7%	290

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.1	30.0%	54.4%	13.3%	2.2%	180
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.3	39.4%	53.5%	6.3%	0.8%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.2	29.6%	61.0%	8.5%	0.9%	1,087
	2010	3.3	37.9%	53.8%	7.1%	1.3%	1,032

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.2	30.0%	60.4%	8.6%	1.1%	1,198
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.3	38.8%	53.3%	6.8%	1.1%	1,061
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.0	21.8%	58.2%	18.2%	1.8%	55
	2010	3.3	37.1%	53.2%	9.7%	.	62

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.2	30.1%	59.9%	8.9%	1.2%	1,211
No disability	2004
	2010	3.3	39.0%	53.1%	6.6%	1.3%	1,090
Disability	2004	3.0	20.8%	62.5%	16.7%	.	48
	2010	3.1	27.7%	59.6%	10.6%	2.1%	94

Grad student respect for minority faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		3.2	29.8%	60.4%	8.7%	1.1%	1,057
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.3	39.0%	52.9%	6.9%	1.2%	1,036
Non-Traditional	2004	3.2	29.0%	58.5%	11.5%	0.9%	217
	2010	3.2	31.8%	58.8%	6.8%	2.7%	148

Faculty respect for female grad students

Faculty respect for female grad students	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	3.2	29.2%	59.9%	9.4%	1.5%	1,276
2004
2010	3.3	42.3%	48.1%	8.1%	1.6%	1,192

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		3.2	31.1%	59.5%	8.9%	0.5%	610
Male	2004
	2010	3.4	45.2%	48.1%	5.4%	1.3%	557
Female	2004	3.1	27.5%	60.2%	9.9%	2.4%	666
	2010	3.3	39.7%	48.0%	10.4%	1.9%	635

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.0	16.7%	67.9%	11.5%	3.8%	78
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.0	25.6%	55.1%	15.4%	3.8%	78
Asian	2004	3.1	25.6%	63.6%	10.8%	.	195
	2010	3.4	45.9%	50.5%	3.3%	0.3%	303
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.2	30.6%	58.3%	8.3%	2.8%	36
	2010	3.5	58.1%	35.5%	6.5%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.2	30.6%	60.1%	7.8%	1.5%	869
	2010	3.3	41.8%	47.0%	9.4%	1.8%	741

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		3.2	29.4%	59.5%	9.5%	1.7%	1,147
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.3	40.1%	48.1%	9.6%	2.1%	842
International student	2004	3.2	27.9%	63.6%	8.5%	.	129
	2010	3.4	47.4%	48.0%	4.3%	0.3%	350

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.0	24.1%	58.2%	16.1%	1.6%	311
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.2	41.5%	44.8%	10.1%	3.6%	335
Middle class	2004	3.2	27.3%	63.2%	7.9%	1.7%	660
	2010	3.3	42.3%	48.5%	8.0%	1.3%	549
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.3	39.3%	54.2%	5.4%	1.0%	295
	2010	3.4	42.8%	51.0%	6.2%	.	292

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		3.2	29.3%	58.7%	10.9%	1.1%	184
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.4	44.1%	48.0%	7.9%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	3.2	29.2%	60.1%	9.1%	1.6%	1,085
	2010	3.3	41.9%	48.1%	8.3%	1.7%	1,041

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.2	29.7%	60.5%	8.5%	1.3%	1,200
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.3	43.1%	47.9%	7.8%	1.2%	1,068
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.8	18.2%	50.9%	27.3%	3.6%	55
	2010	3.2	35.9%	50.0%	10.9%	3.1%	64

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.2	29.3%	60.3%	8.9%	1.5%	1,213
No disability	2004
	2010	3.3	43.1%	48.0%	7.4%	1.6%	1,096
Disability	2004	3.0	29.2%	47.9%	20.8%	2.1%	48
	2010	3.1	33.3%	49.0%	15.6%	2.1%	96

Faculty respect for female grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		3.2	28.9%	60.4%	9.0%	1.7%	1,055
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.3	43.2%	48.0%	7.3%	1.5%	1,042
Non-Traditional	2004	3.2	30.8%	57.5%	11.3%	0.5%	221
	2010	3.2	36.0%	48.7%	13.3%	2.0%	150

Grad student respect for female faculty

Grad student respect for female faculty	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	3.2	32.2%	59.2%	7.4%	1.2%	1,278
2004
2010	3.3	41.1%	52.4%	5.6%	0.8%	1,186

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		3.3	33.9%	58.1%	7.5%	0.5%	614
Male	2004
	2010	3.4	42.6%	51.8%	4.9%	0.7%	556
Female	2004	3.2	30.7%	60.1%	7.4%	1.8%	664
	2010	3.3	39.8%	52.9%	6.3%	1.0%	630

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.1	21.3%	63.8%	13.8%	1.3%	80
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.2	25.6%	64.1%	10.3%	.	78
Asian	2004	3.2	27.4%	61.9%	10.2%	0.5%	197
	2010	3.4	43.9%	52.5%	3.3%	0.3%	303
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.3	31.4%	62.9%	5.7%	.	35
	2010	3.5	51.6%	45.2%	3.2%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.3	34.1%	59.6%	5.2%	1.2%	869
	2010	3.3	41.4%	51.9%	5.7%	1.0%	736

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		3.2	32.5%	58.9%	7.4%	1.2%	1,148
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.3	40.0%	52.7%	6.3%	1.0%	835
International student	2004	3.2	30.0%	61.5%	7.7%	0.8%	130
	2010	3.4	43.9%	51.6%	4.0%	0.6%	351

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.1	26.8%	59.7%	11.6%	1.9%	310
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.3	40.8%	52.0%	6.3%	0.9%	331
Middle class	2004	3.2	30.9%	61.1%	7.0%	1.1%	661
	2010	3.3	40.4%	53.0%	5.5%	1.1%	547
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.4	41.4%	54.2%	3.7%	0.7%	297
	2010	3.4	42.1%	52.4%	5.1%	0.3%	292

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.2	33.0%	57.1%	8.8%	1.1%	182
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.4	42.9%	52.4%	4.0%	0.8%	126
Not first generation	2004	3.2	32.1%	59.5%	7.2%	1.2%	1,089
	2010	3.3	41.0%	52.5%	5.9%	0.7%	1,035

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.2	32.4%	59.7%	6.8%	1.1%	1,202
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.3	41.5%	52.5%	5.5%	0.6%	1,063
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.0	27.3%	50.9%	18.2%	3.6%	55
	2010	3.3	41.9%	51.6%	4.8%	1.6%	62

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.2	32.4%	59.1%	7.2%	1.2%	1,215
No disability	2004
	2010	3.3	42.1%	51.6%	5.5%	0.8%	1,090
Disability	2004	3.2	29.2%	58.3%	12.5%	.	48
	2010	3.2	30.2%	61.5%	7.3%	1.0%	96

Grad student respect for female faculty		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		3.2	32.0%	59.8%	6.8%	1.3%	1,056
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.3	41.8%	51.6%	5.8%	0.9%	1,037
Non-Traditional	2004	3.2	33.3%	55.9%	10.4%	0.5%	222
	2010	3.3	36.9%	57.7%	4.7%	0.7%	149

Back to Top

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	3.0	25.1%	54.0%	16.2%	4.6%	1,275
2004
2010	3.2	33.5%	53.0%	11.0%	2.5%	1,182

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		3.0	26.4%	53.3%	15.5%	4.7%	613
Male	2004
	2010	3.2	32.7%	54.7%	10.3%	2.3%	556
Female	2004	3.0	23.9%	54.7%	16.9%	4.5%	662
	2010	3.2	34.2%	51.4%	11.7%	2.7%	626

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		2.6	8.9%	55.7%	24.1%	11.4%	79
African American/Black	2004
	2010	2.9	18.2%	62.3%	13.0%	6.5%	77
Asian	2004	2.7	13.7%	50.8%	28.4%	7.1%	197
	2010	3.1	29.7%	52.5%	13.5%	4.3%	303
Hispanic/Latino	2004	2.4	5.6%	50.0%	22.2%	22.2%	36
	2010	3.3	41.9%	41.9%	16.1%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.1	28.8%	56.2%	12.5%	2.5%	865
	2010	3.2	36.7%	52.5%	9.5%	1.2%	733

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		3.0	26.5%	54.3%	14.8%	4.5%	1,144
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.2	35.2%	53.5%	9.9%	1.4%	832
International student	2004	2.7	13.0%	51.9%	29.0%	6.1%	131
	2010	3.1	29.4%	51.7%	13.7%	5.1%	350

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		2.9	21.6%	49.7%	21.6%	7.1%	310
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.1	30.1%	55.4%	12.0%	2.4%	332
Middle class	2004	3.0	23.9%	57.3%	14.7%	4.1%	658
	2010	3.2	34.8%	50.6%	12.0%	2.6%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.1	32.0%	51.5%	13.1%	3.4%	297
	2010	3.2	35.1%	54.3%	8.2%	2.4%	291

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		2.9	24.9%	45.9%	23.8%	5.5%	181
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.1	32.5%	48.4%	16.7%	2.4%	126
Not first generation	2004	3.0	25.2%	55.5%	14.8%	4.5%	1,087
	2010	3.2	33.8%	53.3%	10.6%	2.3%	1,031

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.0	25.4%	54.5%	15.6%	4.4%	1,199
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.2	34.2%	52.9%	10.6%	2.3%	1,058
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.7	18.2%	47.3%	25.5%	9.1%	55
	2010	3.1	31.7%	50.8%	15.9%	1.6%	63

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.0	25.0%	54.4%	16.1%	4.5%	1,212
No disability	2004
	2010	3.2	33.9%	52.5%	10.9%	2.8%	1,086
Disability	2004	2.9	27.1%	47.9%	16.7%	8.3%	48
	2010	3.2	29.2%	58.3%	12.5%	.	96

Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age		3.0	25.3%	53.5%	16.7%	4.4%	1,059
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.2	34.1%	52.1%	11.1%	2.6%	1,034
Non-Traditional	2004	3.0	24.1%	56.5%	13.9%	5.6%	216
	2010	3.1	29.1%	58.8%	10.1%	2.0%	148

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Year*	2.8	17.3%	49.0%	26.7%	7.0%	1,249
2004
2010	3.1	28.9%	51.3%	15.9%	3.9%	1,163

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*		2.7	17.6%	45.1%	28.9%	8.4%	596
Male	2004
	2010	3.0	26.8%	51.5%	16.2%	5.5%	544
Female	2004	2.8	17.0%	52.5%	24.8%	5.7%	653
	2010	3.1	30.7%	51.2%	15.7%	2.4%	619

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		2.4	5.3%	46.1%	35.5%	13.2%	76
African American/Black	2004
	2010	2.6	8.3%	55.6%	25.0%	11.1%	72
Asian	2004	2.4	6.8%	38.5%	45.8%	8.9%	192
	2010	2.9	23.2%	47.8%	23.2%	5.7%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	2.2	2.9%	42.9%	28.6%	25.7%	35
	2010	3.2	33.3%	50.0%	16.7%	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	2.9	20.8%	52.9%	21.7%	4.6%	849
	2010	3.2	33.1%	52.5%	11.7%	2.6%	727

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*		2.8	18.5%	50.3%	24.5%	6.7%	1,122
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.1	31.7%	52.6%	12.7%	3.0%	821
International student	2004	2.4	6.3%	37.8%	46.5%	9.4%	127
	2010	2.9	22.2%	48.2%	23.7%	5.8%	342

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		2.7	15.1%	44.7%	30.3%	9.9%	304
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.0	27.4%	50.0%	18.0%	4.6%	328
Middle class	2004	2.8	15.3%	51.3%	27.0%	6.4%	640
	2010	3.0	28.5%	51.2%	15.6%	4.7%	533
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	2.9	24.4%	48.1%	22.4%	5.1%	295
	2010	3.1	31.5%	51.7%	15.0%	1.7%	286

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		2.7	17.0%	40.9%	32.4%	9.7%	176
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.0	24.2%	50.0%	23.4%	2.4%	124
Not first generation	2004	2.8	17.4%	50.3%	25.7%	6.6%	1,066
	2010	3.1	29.6%	51.1%	15.4%	3.9%	1,016

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		2.8	17.7%	49.9%	26.5%	6.0%	1,175
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.1	29.0%	51.1%	16.5%	3.4%	1,041
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.2	10.9%	29.1%	30.9%	29.1%	55
	2010	3.0	30.2%	49.2%	11.1%	9.5%	63

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status		2.8	17.4%	49.4%	26.3%	7.0%	1,187
No disability	2004
	2010	3.1	29.0%	51.5%	15.8%	3.7%	1,070
Disability	2004	2.7	19.1%	38.3%	34.0%	8.5%	47
	2010	3.0	28.0%	49.5%	17.2%	5.4%	93

Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students		Mean	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age*		2.8	17.7%	48.8%	26.8%	6.8%	1,046
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.1	30.1%	50.0%	16.1%	3.7%	1,022
Non-Traditional	2004	2.7	15.3%	50.2%	26.6%	7.9%	203
	2010	3.0	19.9%	61.0%	14.2%	5.0%	141

Back to Top

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.9	22.0%	51.1%	22.6%	3.6%	0.6%	1,285
2004
2010	4.0	27.4%	52.1%	17.6%	2.2%	0.7%	1,181

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.9	23.4%	50.1%	22.9%	2.9%	0.6%	619
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	25.9%	54.4%	17.7%	1.4%	0.5%	555
Female	2004	3.9	20.7%	52.1%	22.4%	4.2%	0.6%	666
	2010	4.0	28.8%	50.0%	17.6%	2.9%	0.8%	626

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.2	3.8%	41.3%	30.0%	20.0%	5.0%	80
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.4	6.3%	46.8%	30.4%	13.9%	2.5%	79
Asian	2004	3.8	14.6%	48.5%	34.8%	2.0%	.	198
	2010	4.0	23.3%	56.7%	19.7%	.	0.3%	300
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.9	20.0%	54.3%	22.9%	2.9%	.	35
	2010	4.3	40.0%	46.7%	13.3%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.0	24.8%	53.4%	19.1%	2.4%	0.2%	874
	2010	4.1	31.1%	51.2%	15.4%	1.9%	0.4%	733

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	23.3%	51.3%	21.1%	3.6%	0.7%	1,153
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	29.1%	49.3%	17.6%	3.1%	0.8%	833
International student	2004	3.7	10.6%	49.2%	36.4%	3.8%	.	132
	2010	4.1	23.6%	58.6%	17.5%	.	0.3%	348

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.9	22.4%	49.0%	21.2%	7.1%	0.3%	312
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.9	25.4%	52.0%	15.4%	5.7%	1.5%	331
Middle class	2004	3.9	20.3%	52.7%	24.1%	2.0%	0.9%	659
	2010	4.1	28.3%	51.8%	19.3%	0.6%	.	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.0	25.2%	50.3%	20.5%	3.7%	0.3%	298
	2010	4.1	28.7%	52.2%	17.6%	1.0%	0.3%	289

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.9	23.4%	53.3%	16.8%	6.5%	.	184
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	29.9%	50.4%	18.1%	0.8%	0.8%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.9	21.8%	50.9%	23.4%	3.1%	0.7%	1,088
	2010	4.0	27.4%	52.4%	17.4%	2.3%	0.5%	1,027

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.9	22.5%	51.3%	21.9%	3.6%	0.7%	1,203
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.1	28.0%	52.1%	17.6%	1.9%	0.4%	1,054
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.7	10.9%	52.7%	30.9%	5.5%	.	55
	2010	3.9	28.1%	51.6%	9.4%	7.8%	3.1%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.9	21.6%	51.7%	22.6%	3.5%	0.7%	1,217
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	28.0%	51.8%	17.4%	2.1%	0.6%	1,084
Disability	2004	4.0	31.9%	40.4%	21.3%	6.4%	.	47
	2010	3.9	20.6%	54.6%	19.6%	3.1%	2.1%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.9	21.5%	51.0%	23.6%	3.2%	0.8%	1,061
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	27.6%	52.1%	17.4%	2.1%	0.7%	1,032
Non-Traditional	2004	4.0	24.6%	51.8%	18.3%	5.4%	.	224
	2010	4.0	26.2%	51.7%	18.8%	2.7%	0.7%	149

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.7	14.7%	41.1%	39.6%	3.6%	0.9%	1,269
2004
2010	3.8	19.5%	45.6%	31.5%	2.6%	0.9%	1,174

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.7	15.2%	41.9%	39.3%	2.8%	0.8%	613
Male	2004
	2010	3.8	18.8%	47.9%	29.7%	2.7%	0.9%	553
Female	2004	3.6	14.3%	40.2%	39.9%	4.4%	1.1%	656
	2010	3.8	20.1%	43.5%	33.2%	2.4%	0.8%	621

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.2	4.0%	30.7%	53.3%	8.0%	4.0%	75
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.4	7.7%	37.2%	43.6%	10.3%	1.3%	78
Asian	2004	3.6	11.7%	39.6%	46.2%	1.5%	1.0%	197
	2010	3.9	24.1%	49.2%	24.7%	1.7%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.3	5.7%	31.4%	54.3%	8.6%	.	35
	2010	3.9	23.3%	40.0%	36.7%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	3.7	16.6%	44.2%	35.9%	2.9%	0.5%	864
	2010	3.8	19.3%	45.8%	32.1%	2.1%	0.7%	729

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.7	15.5%	41.2%	38.5%	3.8%	1.1%	1,137
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.7	17.9%	43.4%	34.8%	2.9%	1.1%	828
International student	2004	3.5	8.3%	40.2%	49.2%	2.3%	.	132
	2010	4.0	23.4%	50.9%	23.7%	1.7%	0.3%	346

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.6	13.7%	38.2%	42.2%	4.9%	1.0%	306
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.7	17.3%	44.7%	32.2%	4.6%	1.2%	329
Middle class	2004	3.7	13.9%	43.6%	38.7%	2.6%	1.1%	653
	2010	3.9	20.3%	48.1%	29.7%	1.5%	0.6%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.7	17.6%	38.3%	38.6%	4.7%	0.7%	295
	2010	3.8	21.4%	41.8%	34.4%	2.1%	0.4%	285

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.7	16.0%	44.8%	35.4%	3.3%	0.6%	181
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.7	20.5%	37.8%	35.4%	3.9%	2.4%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.6	14.5%	40.5%	40.2%	3.7%	1.0%	1,076
	2010	3.8	19.6%	46.6%	31.0%	2.4%	0.5%	1,021

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.7	15.2%	41.7%	38.8%	3.3%	1.0%	1,190
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.8	20.0%	45.7%	31.6%	2.1%	0.7%	1,049
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.2	3.6%	29.1%	54.5%	12.7%	.	55
	2010	3.7	17.5%	46.0%	28.6%	4.8%	3.2%	63

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.7	14.7%	41.5%	39.5%	3.4%	0.9%	1,204
No disability	2004
	2010	3.8	20.3%	45.9%	30.4%	2.7%	0.6%	1,078
Disability	2004	3.5	15.6%	31.1%	42.2%	8.9%	2.2%	45
	2010	3.6	10.4%	41.7%	43.8%	1.0%	3.1%	96

NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		3.6	14.4%	40.7%	40.6%	3.2%	1.1%	1,052
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.8	20.0%	45.2%	31.4%	2.4%	1.0%	1,025
Non-Traditional	2004	3.7	16.6%	42.9%	35.0%	5.5%	.	217
	2010	3.8	16.1%	48.3%	32.2%	3.4%	.	149

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.9	22.6%	47.1%	26.4%	3.2%	0.6%	1,282
2004
2010	4.0	27.0%	49.6%	21.1%	1.8%	0.5%	1,184

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.9	23.2%	47.4%	26.0%	2.9%	0.5%	620
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	25.3%	51.2%	20.1%	2.9%	0.5%	557
Female	2004	3.9	22.1%	46.8%	26.9%	3.5%	0.8%	662
	2010	4.0	28.5%	48.2%	22.0%	0.8%	0.5%	627

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.7	12.8%	52.6%	25.6%	9.0%	.	78
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.7	15.4%	50.0%	29.5%	3.8%	1.3%	78
Asian	2004	3.6	10.9%	40.8%	44.3%	2.5%	1.5%	201
	2010	3.9	20.8%	53.8%	22.1%	2.6%	0.7%	303
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.9	25.7%	42.9%	22.9%	8.6%	.	35
	2010	4.0	29.0%	41.9%	29.0%	.	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	4.0	26.2%	49.9%	21.5%	2.3%	0.1%	870
	2010	4.1	31.1%	48.6%	19.2%	1.0%	0.1%	733

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	23.6%	48.0%	24.3%	3.5%	0.6%	1,149
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	29.3%	47.8%	20.9%	1.6%	0.5%	833
International student	2004	3.7	14.3%	39.1%	45.1%	0.8%	0.8%	133
	2010	3.9	21.7%	53.8%	21.7%	2.3%	0.6%	351

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.9	22.4%	46.8%	25.3%	4.9%	0.6%	308
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.0	26.1%	49.7%	21.5%	2.1%	0.6%	330
Middle class	2004	3.9	21.0%	48.9%	27.1%	2.3%	0.8%	661
	2010	4.0	26.9%	51.2%	20.3%	1.3%	0.4%	547
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.9	26.6%	43.8%	25.9%	3.4%	0.3%	297
	2010	4.0	29.0%	46.6%	22.4%	2.1%	.	290

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.9	23.1%	49.5%	22.5%	4.4%	0.5%	182
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	28.3%	46.5%	21.3%	3.1%	0.8%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.9	22.5%	46.9%	27.0%	2.9%	0.6%	1,087
	2010	4.0	27.1%	50.1%	20.9%	1.7%	0.3%	1,030

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.9	23.3%	47.2%	25.8%	3.0%	0.7%	1,201
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	27.1%	50.1%	21.0%	1.5%	0.3%	1,057
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.6	9.1%	45.5%	38.2%	7.3%	.	55
	2010	4.0	32.8%	43.8%	15.6%	4.7%	3.1%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.9	22.1%	47.9%	26.6%	2.9%	0.6%	1,215
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	26.9%	49.8%	21.1%	1.9%	0.4%	1,087
Disability	2004	3.9	34.8%	32.6%	19.6%	10.9%	2.2%	46
	2010	4.0	28.9%	47.4%	21.6%	.	2.1%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		3.9	21.9%	46.2%	28.1%	3.1%	0.8%	1,061
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	27.0%	49.5%	21.5%	1.4%	0.6%	1,035
Non-Traditional	2004	4.0	26.2%	51.6%	18.6%	3.6%	.	221
	2010	4.0	27.5%	50.3%	18.1%	4.0%	.	149

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.7	15.6%	43.4%	34.6%	5.7%	0.7%	1,273
2004
2010	3.8	19.2%	49.6%	27.5%	3.0%	0.8%	1,180

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.7	15.6%	43.4%	36.4%	4.1%	0.5%	615
Male	2004
	2010	3.8	18.4%	50.6%	27.4%	2.7%	0.9%	555
Female	2004	3.7	15.5%	43.5%	32.8%	7.3%	0.9%	658
	2010	3.8	19.8%	48.6%	27.5%	3.2%	0.8%	625

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.3	3.9%	36.4%	44.2%	15.6%	.	77
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.4	6.4%	38.5%	42.3%	11.5%	1.3%	78
Asian	2004	3.6	10.3%	39.0%	48.2%	2.6%	.	195
	2010	3.9	18.7%	54.7%	25.3%	1.0%	0.3%	300
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.3	5.6%	41.7%	33.3%	16.7%	2.8%	36
	2010	3.9	22.6%	48.4%	25.8%	3.2%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.8	18.3%	46.3%	30.2%	4.7%	0.5%	867
	2010	3.9	20.8%	49.5%	26.5%	2.6%	0.7%	732

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.7	16.4%	44.2%	32.5%	6.1%	0.8%	1,142
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.8	19.5%	46.8%	28.8%	3.8%	1.1%	832
International student	2004	3.5	8.4%	36.6%	52.7%	2.3%	.	131
	2010	3.9	18.4%	56.3%	24.1%	0.9%	0.3%	348

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.6	15.0%	39.5%	35.9%	8.8%	0.7%	306
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.7	16.4%	50.3%	26.1%	5.8%	1.5%	330
Middle class	2004	3.7	14.7%	46.1%	34.4%	4.1%	0.8%	655
	2010	3.9	20.4%	51.4%	26.4%	1.5%	0.4%	545
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.7	17.8%	41.8%	33.3%	6.4%	0.7%	297
	2010	3.8	20.8%	45.5%	31.3%	2.1%	0.3%	288

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.7	17.6%	42.9%	33.0%	6.0%	0.5%	182
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.8	20.5%	48.8%	26.0%	3.1%	1.6%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.7	15.1%	43.7%	34.8%	5.7%	0.7%	1,079
	2010	3.8	19.3%	49.8%	27.5%	2.8%	0.6%	1,026

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.7	16.0%	43.7%	34.0%	5.5%	0.8%	1,194
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.9	19.5%	49.9%	27.8%	2.3%	0.6%	1,053
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.3	3.7%	38.9%	44.4%	13.0%	.	54
	2010	3.8	20.3%	50.0%	18.8%	6.3%	4.7%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.7	15.4%	44.0%	34.5%	5.6%	0.6%	1,207
No disability	2004
	2010	3.8	19.9%	49.7%	26.8%	3.0%	0.7%	1,083
Disability	2004	3.4	15.2%	32.6%	37.0%	10.9%	4.3%	46
	2010	3.6	11.3%	48.5%	35.1%	3.1%	2.1%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.7	15.2%	42.5%	36.1%	5.4%	0.9%	1,054
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.8	19.5%	49.5%	27.4%	2.7%	0.9%	1,031
Non-Traditional	2004	3.8	17.4%	47.9%	27.4%	7.3%	.	219
	2010	3.8	16.8%	50.3%	27.5%	4.7%	0.7%	149

NCSU Supportiveness: White students

NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year	4.1	34.9%	45.3%	18.1%	1.3%	0.4%	1,279
2004
2010	4.1	37.0%	42.1%	17.8%	2.3%	0.8%	1,179

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		4.0	32.7%	42.9%	21.6%	1.9%	0.8%	617
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	29.3%	45.5%	20.1%	3.2%	1.8%	556
Female	2004	4.2	36.9%	47.4%	15.0%	0.8%	.	662
	2010	4.3	43.8%	39.0%	15.7%	1.4%	.	623

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		4.4	54.4%	32.9%	12.7%	.	.	79
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.4	55.1%	34.6%	9.0%	1.3%	.	78
Asian	2004	4.1	32.3%	44.9%	22.2%	0.5%	.	198
	2010	4.2	38.8%	46.5%	14.0%	0.3%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	4.1	34.3%	42.9%	20.0%	2.9%	.	35
	2010	4.5	56.7%	36.7%	6.7%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	33.3%	48.3%	16.8%	1.3%	0.3%	871
	2010	4.0	34.1%	40.9%	20.6%	3.3%	1.1%	733

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		4.1	34.9%	45.8%	17.4%	1.5%	0.4%	1,147
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.1	36.6%	39.6%	19.4%	3.2%	1.1%	833
International student	2004	4.1	34.8%	40.9%	24.2%	.	.	132
	2010	4.2	37.9%	48.0%	13.9%	.	0.3%	346

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		4.1	35.7%	43.2%	17.2%	2.6%	1.3%	308
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.2	38.8%	42.1%	16.1%	1.8%	1.2%	330
Middle class	2004	4.1	30.7%	48.7%	19.2%	1.2%	0.2%	657
	2010	4.1	35.3%	41.5%	20.2%	2.2%	0.7%	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.3	43.1%	39.8%	16.7%	0.3%	.	299
	2010	4.1	37.8%	42.7%	16.3%	2.8%	0.3%	288

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.2	37.7%	46.4%	13.1%	1.1%	1.6%	183
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	37.8%	42.5%	17.3%	.	2.4%	127
Not first generation	2004	4.1	34.4%	45.1%	18.9%	1.4%	0.2%	1,084
	2010	4.1	36.9%	42.1%	17.9%	2.5%	0.6%	1,025

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		4.1	35.0%	45.3%	18.1%	1.3%	0.3%	1,200
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.1	36.1%	42.3%	18.5%	2.3%	0.8%	1,052
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	4.1	37.0%	44.4%	14.8%	1.9%	1.9%	54
	2010	4.4	53.1%	35.9%	6.3%	3.1%	1.6%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.1	35.0%	45.5%	17.9%	1.2%	0.4%	1,215
No disability	2004
	2010	4.1	36.7%	42.7%	17.6%	2.2%	0.8%	1,082
Disability	2004	4.0	34.1%	38.6%	20.5%	6.8%	.	44
	2010	4.1	40.2%	35.1%	20.6%	3.1%	1.0%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		4.1	35.7%	43.9%	18.7%	1.3%	0.4%	1,059
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	36.6%	41.7%	18.3%	2.5%	1.0%	1,030
Non-Traditional	2004	4.1	30.9%	51.8%	15.5%	1.4%	0.5%	220
	2010	4.2	39.6%	45.0%	14.8%	0.7%	.	149

NCSU Supportiveness: International students

NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.9	23.0%	49.9%	23.0%	3.3%	0.7%	1,276
2004
2010	4.0	27.7%	51.4%	18.5%	1.9%	0.6%	1,178

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.9	22.0%	49.9%	23.7%	3.4%	1.0%	617
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	25.9%	51.2%	19.2%	3.1%	0.7%	557
Female	2004	3.9	24.0%	49.9%	22.5%	3.2%	0.5%	659
	2010	4.1	29.3%	51.5%	17.9%	0.8%	0.5%	621

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.6	12.8%	48.7%	29.5%	6.4%	2.6%	78
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.9	25.6%	43.6%	28.2%	1.3%	1.3%	78
Asian	2004	3.6	12.1%	45.5%	36.9%	3.5%	2.0%	198
	2010	4.0	23.8%	54.1%	19.1%	2.3%	0.7%	303
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.8	17.1%	51.4%	25.7%	5.7%	.	35
	2010	4.0	31.0%	44.8%	13.8%	10.3%	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	4.0	27.1%	51.8%	18.7%	2.3%	0.1%	868
	2010	4.1	30.0%	51.6%	17.0%	1.1%	0.3%	729

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	24.2%	50.3%	21.5%	3.3%	0.6%	1,144
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.1	29.7%	49.7%	18.9%	1.2%	0.5%	827
International student	2004	3.7	12.9%	46.2%	36.4%	3.0%	1.5%	132
	2010	4.0	22.8%	55.3%	17.7%	3.4%	0.9%	351

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.9	22.4%	47.1%	26.0%	3.9%	0.6%	308
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	31.1%	47.0%	19.2%	2.1%	0.6%	328
Middle class	2004	3.9	20.9%	53.3%	22.5%	2.6%	0.8%	657
	2010	4.0	26.7%	51.8%	19.7%	1.7%	0.2%	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.0	28.3%	45.8%	20.9%	4.4%	0.7%	297
	2010	4.0	26.0%	55.4%	16.3%	1.7%	0.7%	289

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.9	24.0%	48.1%	23.5%	3.3%	1.1%	183
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	26.8%	49.6%	19.7%	3.9%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	3.9	22.7%	50.5%	22.8%	3.3%	0.6%	1,082
	2010	4.0	27.8%	51.7%	18.5%	1.7%	0.4%	1,024

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.9	23.5%	50.4%	22.1%	3.3%	0.8%	1,197
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.1	27.8%	51.8%	18.6%	1.6%	0.3%	1,051
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.7	13.0%	46.3%	35.2%	5.6%	.	54
	2010	3.9	26.6%	50.0%	17.2%	3.1%	3.1%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.9	22.6%	50.5%	22.9%	3.3%	0.7%	1,212
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	28.0%	51.4%	18.2%	1.8%	0.6%	1,082
Disability	2004	3.9	28.9%	42.2%	22.2%	4.4%	2.2%	45
	2010	3.9	24.0%	51.0%	21.9%	2.1%	1.0%	96

NCSU Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.9	22.4%	49.3%	24.1%	3.4%	0.8%	1,057
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	27.9%	50.6%	19.0%	1.7%	0.7%	1,029
Non-Traditional	2004	4.0	26.0%	53.0%	17.8%	2.7%	0.5%	219
	2010	4.1	26.2%	56.4%	14.8%	2.7%	.	149

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	4.0	22.7%	54.8%	20.3%	2.0%	0.2%	1,277
2004
2010	4.1	27.2%	53.4%	18.0%	0.8%	0.6%	1,181

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		4.0	24.3%	52.2%	22.2%	1.1%	0.2%	613
Male	2004
	2010	4.1	27.7%	52.6%	18.7%	0.4%	0.5%	555
Female	2004	4.0	21.2%	57.2%	18.5%	2.9%	0.2%	664
	2010	4.0	26.7%	54.2%	17.3%	1.3%	0.6%	626

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*		3.9	11.3%	68.8%	16.3%	3.8%	.	80
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.9	16.7%	56.4%	25.6%	.	1.3%	78
Asian	2004	3.8	12.2%	53.1%	34.7%	.	.	196
	2010	4.1	26.5%	54.0%	18.9%	0.3%	0.3%	302
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.9	22.2%	50.0%	25.0%	2.8%	.	36
	2010	4.3	43.3%	46.7%	10.0%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.0	25.8%	55.9%	15.8%	2.4%	0.1%	868
	2010	4.1	28.4%	53.4%	16.5%	1.2%	0.4%	732

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		4.0	23.5%	55.3%	18.7%	2.3%	0.2%	1,147
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	27.4%	51.9%	19.0%	1.1%	0.6%	831
International student	2004	3.8	15.4%	50.8%	33.8%	.	.	130
	2010	4.1	26.6%	57.1%	15.4%	0.3%	0.6%	350

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		4.0	22.6%	54.8%	19.7%	2.6%	0.3%	310
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.0	26.0%	51.7%	19.9%	1.5%	0.9%	331
Middle class	2004	4.0	20.9%	55.9%	20.9%	2.1%	0.2%	656
	2010	4.1	27.6%	54.4%	16.9%	0.7%	0.4%	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.0	26.7%	52.7%	19.3%	1.4%	.	296
	2010	4.1	28.4%	52.9%	18.3%	0.3%	.	289

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.0	26.6%	52.7%	17.9%	2.2%	0.5%	184
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	27.6%	47.2%	24.4%	0.8%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	4.0	21.9%	55.4%	20.5%	2.0%	0.1%	1,081
	2010	4.1	27.4%	54.0%	17.3%	0.9%	0.4%	1,027

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		4.0	23.1%	55.3%	19.6%	1.8%	0.2%	1,198
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.1	27.4%	53.6%	17.8%	0.9%	0.3%	1,054
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.6	13.2%	47.2%	30.2%	9.4%	.	53
	2010	4.0	29.7%	48.4%	18.8%	.	3.1%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*		4.0	22.8%	55.1%	19.8%	2.1%	0.2%	1,210
No disability	2004
	2010	4.1	27.9%	53.3%	17.4%	0.9%	0.5%	1,084
Disability	2004	3.9	19.1%	53.2%	27.7%	.	.	47
	2010	3.9	19.6%	54.6%	23.7%	.	2.1%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		4.0	22.2%	54.8%	21.1%	1.7%	0.2%	1,056
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	27.5%	53.1%	17.9%	0.9%	0.6%	1,031
Non-Traditional	2004	4.0	25.3%	54.8%	16.3%	3.6%	.	221
	2010	4.0	24.7%	56.0%	18.0%	0.7%	0.7%	150

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year	4.0	27.8%	48.2%	23.0%	0.8%	0.2%	1,276
2004
2010	4.0	30.2%	46.8%	20.8%	1.7%	0.5%	1,176

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.9	23.3%	47.5%	27.5%	1.5%	0.3%	615
Male	2004
	2010	3.9	24.5%	47.6%	24.1%	2.7%	1.1%	555
Female	2004	4.1	32.1%	48.9%	18.9%	0.2%	.	661
	2010	4.2	35.3%	46.1%	17.9%	0.8%	.	621

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*		4.2	35.4%	49.4%	15.2%	.	.	79
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.2	37.2%	41.0%	21.8%	.	.	78
Asian	2004	3.8	13.8%	48.5%	37.2%	0.5%	.	196
	2010	4.0	23.4%	52.2%	23.4%	0.7%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.9	25.7%	45.7%	25.7%	2.9%	.	35
	2010	4.3	40.0%	46.7%	13.3%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	30.7%	49.5%	18.8%	0.8%	0.2%	869
	2010	4.1	31.8%	45.1%	20.1%	2.5%	0.5%	730

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		4.1	29.4%	48.3%	21.2%	0.9%	0.2%	1,145
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.1	32.9%	44.0%	20.2%	2.3%	0.6%	831
International student	2004	3.7	13.7%	47.3%	38.9%	.	.	131
	2010	4.0	23.8%	53.3%	22.3%	0.3%	0.3%	345

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		4.0	28.2%	47.9%	22.0%	1.6%	0.3%	309
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	33.2%	45.4%	19.8%	0.9%	0.6%	328
Middle class	2004	4.0	24.8%	50.2%	24.2%	0.8%	.	656
	2010	4.0	27.1%	48.6%	22.5%	1.5%	0.4%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.1	34.1%	44.3%	21.3%	.	0.3%	296
	2010	4.1	33.0%	44.4%	19.4%	2.8%	0.3%	288

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.0	25.7%	53.0%	19.7%	1.1%	0.5%	183
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	28.3%	48.8%	20.5%	0.8%	1.6%	127
Not first generation	2004	4.0	28.1%	47.5%	23.5%	0.7%	0.1%	1,081
	2010	4.1	30.6%	46.6%	20.7%	1.8%	0.3%	1,022

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		4.0	28.0%	48.0%	23.0%	0.8%	0.2%	1,197
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	30.1%	47.0%	20.8%	1.7%	0.4%	1,050
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	4.1	26.4%	52.8%	20.8%	.	.	53
	2010	4.2	39.7%	46.0%	11.1%	1.6%	1.6%	63

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.0	27.5%	48.7%	22.9%	0.7%	0.2%	1,212
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	29.7%	47.2%	20.9%	1.7%	0.5%	1,079
Disability	2004	4.1	36.4%	40.9%	20.5%	2.3%	.	44
	2010	4.1	35.1%	42.3%	19.6%	2.1%	1.0%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		4.0	28.0%	46.5%	24.7%	0.7%	0.2%	1,057
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	29.8%	46.6%	21.0%	1.9%	0.6%	1,027
Non-Traditional	2004	4.1	26.9%	56.6%	15.1%	1.4%	.	219
	2010	4.1	32.9%	47.7%	19.5%	.	.	149

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.3	8.3%	33.2%	44.2%	11.6%	2.7%	1,266
2004
2010	3.6	16.2%	41.0%	33.7%	7.3%	1.7%	1,171

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.3	9.7%	29.7%	47.9%	10.3%	2.3%	609
Male	2004
	2010	3.6	16.0%	42.5%	33.2%	6.5%	1.8%	555
Female	2004	3.3	7.0%	36.4%	40.8%	12.8%	3.0%	657
	2010	3.6	16.4%	39.6%	34.3%	8.1%	1.6%	616

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.2	3.8%	30.4%	48.1%	15.2%	2.5%	79
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.4	6.7%	40.0%	40.0%	9.3%	4.0%	75
Asian	2004	3.2	4.7%	17.7%	70.3%	6.3%	1.0%	192
	2010	3.7	13.7%	47.2%	35.8%	2.7%	0.7%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	2.9	.	19.4%	61.1%	13.9%	5.6%	36
	2010	3.8	21.4%	39.3%	39.3%	.	.	28
White/Caucasian	2004	3.4	9.3%	37.8%	38.4%	12.2%	2.4%	863
	2010	3.6	18.5%	39.0%	31.7%	9.2%	1.6%	731

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.4	9.1%	34.8%	41.0%	12.3%	2.8%	1,137
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.6	17.5%	37.8%	33.1%	9.5%	2.2%	829
International student	2004	3.1	1.6%	18.6%	72.9%	5.4%	1.6%	129
	2010	3.7	13.2%	48.8%	35.4%	2.0%	0.6%	342

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.2	9.4%	25.7%	46.9%	13.7%	4.2%	307
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.5	14.1%	40.1%	34.9%	8.3%	2.8%	327
Middle class	2004	3.4	7.4%	37.7%	42.6%	10.3%	2.0%	652
	2010	3.7	16.9%	43.0%	31.5%	7.6%	1.1%	540
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.3	9.5%	30.3%	44.6%	12.9%	2.7%	294
	2010	3.6	17.5%	37.4%	37.8%	6.3%	1.0%	286

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		3.3	9.9%	28.2%	50.8%	8.3%	2.8%	181
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.6	14.3%	43.7%	35.7%	4.8%	1.6%	126
Not first generation	2004	3.3	8.1%	34.0%	43.0%	12.3%	2.7%	1,075
	2010	3.6	16.6%	40.7%	33.5%	7.6%	1.6%	1,021

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.4	8.6%	34.4%	44.1%	10.8%	2.2%	1,189
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.7	17.0%	41.3%	33.7%	6.7%	1.3%	1,044
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.5	3.7%	7.4%	38.9%	35.2%	14.8%	54
	2010	3.2	4.6%	40.0%	29.2%	20.0%	6.2%	65

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.3	8.5%	33.6%	44.0%	11.6%	2.4%	1,201
No disability	2004
	2010	3.7	16.8%	41.5%	33.1%	7.2%	1.4%	1,074
Disability	2004	3.0	6.4%	21.3%	46.8%	14.9%	10.6%	47
	2010	3.4	10.3%	35.1%	40.2%	9.3%	5.2%	97

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.3	8.4%	32.1%	45.0%	11.5%	3.0%	1,048
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.6	16.7%	40.2%	34.0%	7.5%	1.7%	1,025
Non-Traditional	2004	3.4	7.8%	38.5%	40.4%	11.9%	1.4%	218
	2010	3.6	13.0%	46.6%	32.2%	6.2%	2.1%	146

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.8	21.5%	43.9%	31.9%	2.4%	0.3%	1,272
2004
2010	4.1	35.3%	43.3%	19.9%	1.0%	0.5%	1,179

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.8	20.6%	43.6%	33.0%	2.6%	0.3%	613
Male	2004
	2010	4.1	32.4%	46.6%	19.2%	0.7%	1.1%	556
Female	2004	3.9	22.5%	44.2%	31.0%	2.1%	0.3%	659
	2010	4.1	37.9%	40.3%	20.5%	1.3%	.	623

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.7	13.9%	41.8%	43.0%	.	1.3%	79
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.1	34.6%	43.6%	20.5%	1.3%	.	78
Asian	2004	3.7	15.4%	44.6%	39.0%	1.0%	.	195
	2010	4.0	26.5%	52.3%	20.5%	0.3%	0.3%	298
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.8	22.2%	36.1%	41.7%	.	.	36
	2010	4.2	44.8%	31.0%	24.1%	.	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	3.9	23.6%	45.5%	28.1%	2.5%	0.3%	866
	2010	4.1	38.2%	40.4%	19.5%	1.4%	0.5%	735

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	22.6%	43.9%	30.5%	2.6%	0.4%	1,141
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.1	38.7%	39.3%	20.1%	1.3%	0.6%	832
International student	2004	3.7	12.2%	43.5%	44.3%	.	.	131
	2010	4.1	27.1%	52.7%	19.6%	0.3%	0.3%	347

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.8	20.8%	40.3%	35.4%	3.6%	.	308
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	36.4%	41.9%	20.5%	0.9%	0.3%	327
Middle class	2004	3.8	19.4%	46.6%	31.2%	2.3%	0.5%	653
	2010	4.1	33.6%	43.8%	20.6%	1.3%	0.7%	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.9	27.4%	42.2%	28.7%	1.4%	0.3%	296
	2010	4.2	37.0%	44.3%	18.3%	0.3%	.	289

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		3.9	23.0%	44.8%	29.5%	2.7%	.	183
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	34.6%	44.1%	20.5%	.	0.8%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.8	21.4%	43.9%	32.0%	2.3%	0.4%	1,077
	2010	4.1	35.4%	43.3%	19.9%	1.1%	0.3%	1,022

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.8	22.0%	43.9%	31.4%	2.3%	0.3%	1,194
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.1	34.5%	44.3%	19.8%	1.0%	0.4%	1,051
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.8	17.0%	47.2%	34.0%	1.9%	.	53
	2010	4.4	57.1%	27.0%	14.3%	.	1.6%	63

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.8	21.1%	44.7%	31.4%	2.4%	0.3%	1,206
No disability	2004
	2010	4.1	35.1%	43.8%	19.6%	1.0%	0.5%	1,082
Disability	2004	3.9	32.6%	30.4%	34.8%	2.2%	.	46
	2010	4.1	37.1%	37.1%	23.7%	1.0%	1.0%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		3.8	22.3%	43.0%	32.0%	2.5%	0.3%	1,057
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	36.1%	42.8%	19.8%	1.1%	0.3%	1,029
Non-Traditional	2004	3.8	17.7%	48.4%	31.6%	1.9%	0.5%	215
	2010	4.0	30.0%	46.7%	20.7%	0.7%	2.0%	150

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year	3.7	14.9%	47.8%	29.0%	6.9%	1.3%	1,268
2004
2010	3.7	18.9%	46.2%	26.9%	6.7%	1.3%	1,178

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender		3.7	15.5%	46.0%	31.1%	5.7%	1.6%	611
Male	2004
	2010	3.8	19.6%	46.1%	27.9%	5.0%	1.3%	555
Female	2004	3.7	14.3%	49.5%	27.1%	8.1%	1.1%	657
	2010	3.7	18.3%	46.2%	26.0%	8.2%	1.3%	623

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.4	7.4%	44.4%	28.4%	16.0%	3.7%	81
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.6	14.1%	47.4%	28.2%	7.7%	2.6%	78
Asian	2004	3.6	7.8%	45.6%	43.0%	3.6%	.	193
	2010	3.9	19.7%	50.5%	26.8%	2.7%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.3	5.6%	33.3%	44.4%	13.9%	2.8%	36
	2010	3.8	20.0%	40.0%	36.7%	3.3%	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	3.8	17.5%	49.9%	25.4%	6.0%	1.0%	861
	2010	3.7	19.5%	44.7%	26.7%	7.6%	1.4%	733

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.7	16.0%	47.9%	27.0%	7.6%	1.5%	1,137
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.7	18.9%	43.7%	27.2%	8.4%	1.7%	830
International student	2004	3.6	5.3%	46.6%	46.6%	1.5%	.	131
	2010	3.9	19.0%	52.0%	26.1%	2.6%	0.3%	348

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.6	14.6%	41.2%	31.2%	11.4%	1.6%	308
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.7	17.1%	45.7%	26.5%	8.2%	2.4%	328
Middle class	2004	3.7	14.5%	49.9%	28.2%	5.8%	1.5%	653
	2010	3.8	18.4%	46.8%	27.6%	6.4%	0.7%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.8	16.7%	49.7%	27.9%	5.1%	0.7%	294
	2010	3.8	21.8%	46.0%	26.3%	5.5%	0.3%	289

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.7	17.0%	45.6%	29.1%	7.7%	0.5%	182
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.7	19.7%	43.3%	28.3%	6.3%	2.4%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.7	14.7%	48.1%	28.8%	6.9%	1.5%	1,076
	2010	3.8	18.8%	46.9%	26.6%	6.7%	1.0%	1,023

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.7	15.2%	48.4%	28.5%	6.5%	1.3%	1,191
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.8	19.1%	47.2%	26.4%	6.4%	1.0%	1,051
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.3	11.3%	34.0%	32.1%	20.8%	1.9%	53
	2010	3.5	21.9%	31.3%	28.1%	15.6%	3.1%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.7	15.1%	48.3%	28.7%	6.7%	1.2%	1,203
No disability	2004
	2010	3.8	19.3%	46.7%	26.6%	6.2%	1.2%	1,082
Disability	2004	3.3	12.8%	34.0%	31.9%	17.0%	4.3%	47
	2010	3.5	14.6%	40.6%	30.2%	12.5%	2.1%	96

NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.7	14.2%	48.6%	30.2%	6.0%	1.0%	1,050
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.8	19.0%	46.3%	27.9%	5.6%	1.2%	1,027
Non-Traditional	2004	3.6	18.3%	44.0%	23.4%	11.5%	2.8%	218
	2010	3.6	18.5%	45.7%	19.9%	13.9%	2.0%	151

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.6	12.5%	40.9%	39.3%	5.9%	1.3%	1,263
2004
2010	3.8	20.1%	45.8%	29.3%	3.9%	0.8%	1,177

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.6	12.7%	40.8%	39.6%	5.6%	1.3%	608
Male	2004
	2010	3.9	20.5%	48.5%	27.7%	2.2%	1.1%	555
Female	2004	3.6	12.4%	41.1%	38.9%	6.3%	1.4%	655
	2010	3.8	19.8%	43.4%	30.7%	5.5%	0.6%	622

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*		3.2	3.8%	35.4%	41.8%	15.2%	3.8%	79
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.4	9.0%	37.2%	41.0%	11.5%	1.3%	78
Asian	2004	3.5	9.4%	34.4%	52.1%	4.2%	.	192
	2010	3.9	20.4%	48.5%	28.1%	2.0%	1.0%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.2	.	31.4%	57.1%	8.6%	2.9%	35
	2010	3.9	27.6%	34.5%	37.9%	.	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	3.7	14.3%	44.5%	35.1%	5.2%	0.9%	861
	2010	3.8	21.3%	45.8%	28.4%	4.0%	0.5%	733

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.6	13.2%	42.0%	36.9%	6.4%	1.5%	1,133
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.8	20.6%	43.9%	29.8%	4.9%	0.8%	830
International student	2004	3.4	6.2%	31.5%	60.0%	2.3%	.	130
	2010	3.9	19.0%	50.4%	28.2%	1.4%	0.9%	347

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.4	11.4%	32.0%	43.5%	10.5%	2.6%	306
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.7	18.5%	43.2%	28.6%	7.9%	1.8%	329
Middle class	2004	3.6	11.4%	45.6%	36.7%	5.4%	0.9%	651
	2010	3.8	20.1%	47.2%	29.7%	3.0%	.	542
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.7	16.4%	39.9%	39.9%	2.7%	1.0%	293
	2010	3.9	22.2%	45.8%	29.9%	1.4%	0.7%	288

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.5	13.3%	35.9%	39.8%	7.7%	3.3%	181
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.7	21.3%	39.4%	31.5%	6.3%	1.6%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.6	12.4%	41.8%	39.1%	5.7%	1.0%	1,072
	2010	3.8	20.2%	46.6%	28.9%	3.6%	0.6%	1,023

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.6	13.0%	41.7%	38.6%	5.5%	1.2%	1,186
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.8	20.7%	46.2%	28.8%	3.8%	0.6%	1,050
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.1	3.8%	24.5%	50.9%	17.0%	3.8%	53
	2010	3.6	18.8%	42.2%	26.6%	9.4%	3.1%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.6	12.7%	41.4%	39.1%	5.7%	1.2%	1,200
No disability	2004
	2010	3.8	20.7%	46.5%	28.8%	3.1%	0.8%	1,080
Disability	2004	3.2	11.1%	26.7%	42.2%	13.3%	6.7%	45
	2010	3.5	13.4%	38.1%	35.1%	12.4%	1.0%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.6	12.5%	40.0%	40.6%	5.7%	1.1%	1,047
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.8	20.5%	45.5%	29.5%	3.5%	1.0%	1,027
Non-Traditional	2004	3.6	12.5%	45.4%	32.9%	6.9%	2.3%	216
	2010	3.8	17.3%	48.0%	28.0%	6.7%	.	150

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.8	16.1%	49.6%	32.0%	2.1%	0.2%	1,261
2004
2010	3.9	20.5%	50.0%	27.8%	1.3%	0.3%	1,178

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender		3.7	15.0%	46.6%	35.7%	2.3%	0.3%	607
Male	2004
	2010	3.9	19.1%	49.5%	29.7%	0.9%	0.7%	555
Female	2004	3.8	17.1%	52.3%	28.6%	1.8%	0.2%	654
	2010	3.9	21.8%	50.4%	26.2%	1.6%	.	623

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*		3.7	10.3%	48.7%	37.2%	3.8%	.	78
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.7	10.3%	55.1%	30.8%	3.8%	.	78
Asian	2004	3.6	8.9%	40.6%	48.4%	2.1%	.	192
	2010	3.9	19.5%	49.2%	30.3%	0.3%	0.7%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.4	.	44.4%	52.8%	.	2.8%	36
	2010	3.9	23.3%	43.3%	33.3%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	3.9	18.3%	53.9%	26.4%	1.4%	.	859
	2010	3.9	22.2%	49.7%	26.5%	1.5%	0.1%	735

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.8	17.1%	51.3%	29.4%	2.0%	0.3%	1,131
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.9	21.6%	49.5%	26.9%	1.7%	0.2%	832
International student	2004	3.5	7.7%	34.6%	55.4%	2.3%	.	130
	2010	3.9	17.9%	51.2%	30.1%	0.3%	0.6%	346

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.7	14.3%	44.8%	36.7%	3.6%	0.6%	308
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.9	19.5%	51.4%	26.7%	2.1%	0.3%	329
Middle class	2004	3.8	14.8%	53.1%	30.2%	1.7%	0.2%	648
	2010	3.9	20.7%	50.6%	27.2%	1.3%	0.2%	541
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.9	20.9%	47.3%	30.5%	1.4%	.	292
	2010	3.9	21.7%	47.2%	30.3%	0.3%	0.3%	290

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.8	14.0%	53.1%	29.6%	2.2%	1.1%	179
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.9	23.6%	44.9%	29.9%	1.6%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	3.8	16.4%	49.2%	32.3%	2.1%	0.1%	1,072
	2010	3.9	20.3%	50.8%	27.3%	1.3%	0.3%	1,024

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		3.8	16.2%	50.1%	31.5%	2.1%	0.1%	1,184
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.9	20.8%	49.7%	27.9%	1.3%	0.3%	1,052
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.7	15.1%	43.4%	39.6%	.	1.9%	53
	2010	4.0	25.4%	54.0%	17.5%	1.6%	1.6%	63

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.8	16.1%	49.8%	31.8%	2.1%	0.2%	1,197
No disability	2004
	2010	3.9	20.8%	49.9%	27.8%	1.2%	0.3%	1,081
Disability	2004	3.8	17.4%	50.0%	28.3%	2.2%	2.2%	46
	2010	3.8	17.5%	51.5%	27.8%	2.1%	1.0%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.8	16.1%	48.1%	33.2%	2.3%	0.2%	1,047
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.9	21.1%	48.7%	28.3%	1.5%	0.4%	1,028
Non-Traditional	2004	3.9	15.9%	56.5%	26.2%	0.9%	0.5%	214
	2010	3.9	16.7%	58.7%	24.7%	.	.	150

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.9	23.0%	45.4%	30.8%	0.7%	0.1%	1,258
2004
2010	4.0	26.7%	45.6%	26.0%	1.4%	0.3%	1,174

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender		3.9	21.1%	44.2%	33.9%	0.8%	.	607
Male	2004
	2010	3.9	23.4%	45.4%	28.5%	2.2%	0.5%	555
Female	2004	4.0	24.7%	46.5%	28.0%	0.6%	0.2%	651
	2010	4.0	29.7%	45.7%	23.7%	0.8%	.	619

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		4.0	29.5%	41.0%	29.5%	.	.	78
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.1	31.2%	44.2%	23.4%	1.3%	.	77
Asian	2004	3.6	13.1%	37.7%	48.7%	0.5%	.	191
	2010	3.9	21.5%	48.1%	29.6%	0.3%	0.3%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.6	8.3%	44.4%	47.2%	.	.	36
	2010	4.0	30.0%	36.7%	33.3%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.0	24.4%	49.4%	25.6%	0.6%	.	856
	2010	4.0	28.3%	45.1%	24.5%	2.0%	0.1%	732

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	24.4%	46.9%	27.8%	0.8%	0.1%	1,128
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	29.5%	43.7%	24.6%	1.9%	0.2%	828
International student	2004	3.5	10.8%	32.3%	56.9%	.	.	130
	2010	3.9	20.2%	50.0%	29.2%	0.3%	0.3%	346

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.9	26.9%	39.0%	32.1%	2.0%	.	305
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	30.7%	46.6%	21.5%	0.9%	0.3%	326
Middle class	2004	3.9	20.4%	50.1%	28.9%	0.5%	0.2%	647
	2010	4.0	25.7%	45.8%	27.4%	1.1%	.	541
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.9	24.6%	42.3%	33.1%	.	.	293
	2010	3.9	24.9%	43.6%	28.4%	2.8%	0.3%	289

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		3.9	23.9%	46.7%	29.4%	.	.	180
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	33.1%	40.2%	26.8%	.	.	127
Not first generation	2004	3.9	22.8%	45.4%	30.8%	0.8%	0.1%	1,068
	2010	4.0	26.2%	46.4%	25.7%	1.6%	0.2%	1,020

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.9	22.8%	45.5%	30.9%	0.8%	0.1%	1,181
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	26.7%	45.6%	26.0%	1.5%	0.2%	1,047
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	4.0	28.3%	47.2%	24.5%	.	.	53
	2010	4.2	40.6%	42.2%	15.6%	.	1.6%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.9	22.9%	45.6%	30.6%	0.8%	0.1%	1,194
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	26.5%	46.1%	26.0%	1.2%	0.2%	1,077
Disability	2004	4.0	28.3%	43.5%	28.3%	.	.	46
	2010	3.9	29.9%	39.2%	25.8%	4.1%	1.0%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		3.9	23.0%	44.3%	31.8%	0.9%	0.1%	1,044
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	27.6%	44.2%	26.5%	1.4%	0.3%	1,026
Non-Traditional	2004	4.0	22.9%	50.9%	26.2%	.	.	214
	2010	3.9	20.9%	54.7%	22.3%	2.0%	.	148

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.5	11.0%	37.1%	39.6%	10.2%	1.9%	1,249
2004
2010	3.7	17.7%	41.7%	30.3%	8.5%	1.8%	1,179

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.5	11.6%	37.8%	42.3%	6.8%	1.5%	603
Male	2004
	2010	3.7	18.9%	44.9%	28.5%	5.6%	2.2%	555
Female	2004	3.4	10.5%	36.5%	37.2%	13.5%	2.3%	646
	2010	3.6	16.7%	38.9%	31.9%	11.1%	1.4%	624

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.2	5.4%	35.1%	36.5%	20.3%	2.7%	74
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.4	10.3%	39.7%	32.1%	15.4%	2.6%	78
Asian	2004	3.5	8.4%	37.2%	51.3%	3.1%	.	191
	2010	3.8	19.4%	50.5%	25.8%	3.3%	1.0%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.1	.	37.1%	42.9%	17.1%	2.9%	35
	2010	3.7	26.7%	23.3%	43.3%	6.7%	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	3.5	12.4%	38.5%	37.4%	9.8%	1.9%	854
	2010	3.6	17.8%	39.5%	31.5%	9.5%	1.6%	734

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.5	11.4%	37.4%	38.0%	11.0%	2.1%	1,120
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	3.6	17.2%	37.9%	32.2%	10.7%	2.0%	832
International student	2004	3.5	7.8%	34.9%	53.5%	3.9%	.	129
	2010	3.8	19.0%	51.0%	25.6%	3.2%	1.2%	347

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.3	10.3%	33.1%	38.4%	15.6%	2.6%	302
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.6	16.7%	38.6%	31.9%	9.7%	3.0%	329
Middle class	2004	3.5	10.1%	41.2%	37.9%	9.3%	1.5%	646
	2010	3.7	17.3%	43.5%	30.0%	8.3%	0.9%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.5	14.2%	32.5%	43.9%	7.3%	2.1%	289
	2010	3.7	20.4%	41.5%	29.4%	7.3%	1.4%	289

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.4	11.2%	38.2%	36.0%	12.4%	2.2%	178
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.6	19.7%	38.6%	29.9%	10.2%	1.6%	127
Not first generation	2004	3.5	11.0%	37.1%	40.0%	10.0%	1.9%	1,062
	2010	3.7	17.7%	42.3%	30.0%	8.3%	1.7%	1,026

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.5	11.2%	38.1%	39.2%	9.7%	1.8%	1,173
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.7	18.1%	42.5%	29.4%	8.5%	1.4%	1,053
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.0	7.5%	22.6%	39.6%	26.4%	3.8%	53
	2010	3.5	20.3%	28.1%	37.5%	7.8%	6.3%	64

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.5	11.0%	37.5%	39.6%	9.9%	1.9%	1,188
No disability	2004
	2010	3.7	18.5%	42.2%	30.0%	7.8%	1.5%	1,082
Disability	2004	3.3	13.6%	29.5%	31.8%	22.7%	2.3%	44
	2010	3.3	9.3%	36.1%	33.0%	16.5%	5.2%	97

NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.4	10.7%	36.4%	41.6%	9.4%	1.8%	1,038
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.7	17.8%	42.7%	30.7%	7.4%	1.5%	1,030
Non-Traditional	2004	3.5	12.8%	40.8%	29.9%	14.2%	2.4%	211
	2010	3.5	17.4%	34.9%	27.5%	16.1%	4.0%	149

Back to Top

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.9	24.2%	47.9%	23.7%	3.6%	0.6%	1,258
2004
2010	4.1	33.3%	44.8%	18.0%	2.9%	1.0%	1,181

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.9	23.4%	47.8%	25.7%	3.0%	0.2%	603
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	29.8%	47.3%	20.2%	2.2%	0.5%	554
Female	2004	3.9	25.0%	48.1%	21.8%	4.1%	0.9%	655
	2010	4.1	36.4%	42.6%	16.1%	3.5%	1.4%	627

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.3	6.9%	45.8%	25.0%	15.3%	6.9%	72
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.7	24.4%	37.2%	23.1%	12.8%	2.6%	78
Asian	2004	3.7	16.2%	43.5%	36.1%	3.7%	0.5%	191
	2010	4.0	23.4%	54.5%	20.4%	1.3%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.8	13.9%	55.6%	22.2%	8.3%	.	36
	2010	4.1	33.3%	43.3%	23.3%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.0	26.9%	50.5%	20.4%	2.2%	0.1%	864
	2010	4.1	38.2%	42.4%	16.1%	2.4%	0.8%	735

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	25.5%	48.2%	22.1%	3.5%	0.6%	1,130
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.1	37.8%	40.6%	17.1%	3.2%	1.3%	836
International student	2004	3.7	13.3%	45.3%	37.5%	3.9%	.	128
	2010	4.0	22.3%	55.1%	20.3%	2.0%	0.3%	345

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.9	24.7%	44.5%	25.3%	4.9%	0.6%	308
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.0	33.6%	42.4%	16.4%	5.5%	2.1%	330
Middle class	2004	3.9	23.5%	49.0%	24.0%	2.8%	0.8%	651
	2010	4.1	33.3%	45.5%	18.6%	2.2%	0.4%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.0	25.8%	49.5%	21.3%	3.5%	.	287
	2010	4.1	33.4%	45.2%	19.7%	1.4%	0.3%	290

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.0	28.8%	46.9%	20.3%	3.4%	0.6%	177
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	32.3%	44.9%	21.3%	1.6%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	3.9	23.5%	48.3%	24.2%	3.5%	0.6%	1,071
	2010	4.1	33.5%	44.6%	17.8%	3.1%	1.0%	1,029

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.9	24.9%	48.0%	23.3%	3.2%	0.6%	1,180
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.1	33.6%	45.1%	17.9%	2.8%	0.6%	1,055
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.7	13.0%	50.0%	29.6%	7.4%	.	54
	2010	4.0	41.5%	33.8%	15.4%	3.1%	6.2%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.9	23.9%	48.7%	23.3%	3.5%	0.6%	1,196
No disability	2004
	2010	4.1	33.6%	44.5%	18.0%	3.0%	0.8%	1,083
Disability	2004	4.0	31.8%	36.4%	29.5%	2.3%	.	44
	2010	4.0	29.6%	48.0%	18.4%	1.0%	3.1%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: African American students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.9	23.0%	47.6%	25.3%	3.7%	0.6%	1,041
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	33.3%	44.4%	18.5%	2.8%	1.0%	1,031
Non-Traditional	2004	4.1	30.4%	49.8%	16.1%	3.2%	0.5%	217
	2010	4.1	33.3%	47.3%	14.7%	3.3%	1.3%	150

>Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.7	18.8%	39.0%	38.8%	2.7%	0.6%	1,237
2004
2010	4.0	28.8%	42.1%	26.5%	1.8%	0.8%	1,170

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.7	17.9%	39.5%	40.0%	2.0%	0.5%	597
Male	2004
	2010	3.9	26.2%	45.3%	26.0%	1.6%	0.9%	550
Female	2004	3.7	19.7%	38.6%	37.7%	3.4%	0.6%	640
	2010	4.0	31.1%	39.4%	26.9%	1.9%	0.6%	620

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.4	7.2%	36.2%	44.9%	8.7%	2.9%	69
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.8	23.7%	34.2%	36.8%	3.9%	1.3%	76
Asian	2004	3.6	14.4%	36.4%	47.1%	1.6%	0.5%	187
	2010	4.0	24.2%	51.2%	22.6%	1.3%	0.7%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.3	5.6%	33.3%	50.0%	11.1%	.	36
	2010	3.8	30.0%	26.7%	40.0%	3.3%	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	3.8	20.8%	41.6%	35.3%	2.0%	0.2%	850
	2010	4.0	31.1%	40.6%	26.2%	1.6%	0.4%	729

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.7	19.7%	39.3%	37.4%	3.0%	0.6%	1,110
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	31.3%	37.9%	27.9%	2.1%	0.8%	828
International student	2004	3.6	11.0%	37.0%	51.2%	0.8%	.	127
	2010	4.0	22.8%	52.3%	23.1%	1.2%	0.6%	342

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.7	19.3%	34.7%	42.3%	3.0%	0.7%	300
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.9	29.1%	38.3%	27.9%	3.1%	1.5%	326
Middle class	2004	3.7	18.1%	40.8%	38.2%	2.3%	0.6%	642
	2010	4.0	29.2%	44.1%	25.0%	1.5%	0.2%	537
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.8	20.5%	39.9%	36.0%	3.2%	0.4%	283
	2010	4.0	29.1%	41.5%	28.4%	0.7%	0.3%	289

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.8	22.5%	39.3%	35.8%	1.7%	0.6%	173
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.9	28.6%	35.7%	32.5%	3.2%	.	126
Not first generation	2004	3.7	18.3%	39.2%	39.1%	2.8%	0.6%	1,054
	2010	4.0	29.1%	42.6%	26.0%	1.6%	0.7%	1,020

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.7	19.5%	39.3%	38.3%	2.4%	0.5%	1,161
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	29.7%	42.2%	26.0%	1.6%	0.5%	1,047
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.4	7.5%	34.0%	47.2%	9.4%	1.9%	53
	2010	3.8	28.1%	34.4%	31.3%	1.6%	4.7%	64

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.7	18.8%	39.8%	38.2%	2.6%	0.5%	1,177
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	29.1%	42.0%	26.2%	2.0%	0.7%	1,073
Disability	2004	3.5	21.4%	21.4%	50.0%	4.8%	2.4%	42
	2010	3.9	25.8%	43.3%	29.9%	.	1.0%	97

Grad Program Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.7	18.6%	38.3%	39.9%	2.6%	0.6%	1,026
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	29.2%	42.0%	26.0%	2.0%	0.9%	1,021
Non-Traditional	2004	3.8	19.9%	42.7%	33.6%	3.3%	0.5%	211
	2010	3.9	26.2%	43.0%	30.2%	0.7%	.	149

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	4.0	28.9%	45.1%	22.8%	2.6%	0.6%	1,247
2004
2010	4.1	35.4%	46.0%	16.8%	1.3%	0.6%	1,179

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		4.0	29.5%	44.0%	24.3%	1.7%	0.5%	600
Male	2004
	2010	4.1	32.5%	48.2%	17.5%	1.1%	0.7%	554
Female	2004	4.0	28.4%	46.1%	21.3%	3.4%	0.8%	647
	2010	4.2	37.9%	44.0%	16.2%	1.4%	0.5%	625

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.7	15.7%	51.4%	24.3%	5.7%	2.9%	70
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.0	30.3%	40.8%	27.6%	.	1.3%	76
Asian	2004	3.7	17.7%	39.6%	38.0%	3.1%	1.6%	192
	2010	4.0	23.6%	53.8%	19.3%	2.7%	0.7%	301
Hispanic/Latino	2004	4.0	30.6%	47.2%	16.7%	5.6%	.	36
	2010	4.1	43.3%	26.7%	30.0%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	31.9%	46.8%	19.2%	2.0%	0.1%	855
	2010	4.2	40.1%	44.7%	14.2%	0.8%	0.1%	733

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		4.0	29.7%	45.8%	21.3%	2.7%	0.6%	1,119
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.2	40.1%	43.0%	15.6%	0.7%	0.6%	833
International student	2004	3.8	22.7%	39.1%	35.9%	1.6%	0.8%	128
	2010	4.0	24.0%	53.2%	19.7%	2.6%	0.6%	346

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		4.0	31.8%	39.4%	24.5%	3.3%	1.0%	302
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	34.9%	45.0%	17.4%	1.5%	1.2%	327
Middle class	2004	4.0	26.5%	48.1%	22.8%	2.0%	0.6%	649
	2010	4.2	35.3%	47.4%	16.2%	1.1%	.	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.0	31.3%	44.7%	20.8%	2.8%	0.4%	284
	2010	4.2	36.6%	44.1%	17.9%	1.0%	0.3%	290

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.0	34.3%	40.0%	22.3%	2.3%	1.1%	175
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	33.1%	44.1%	20.5%	2.4%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	4.0	28.0%	46.1%	22.8%	2.5%	0.6%	1,062
	2010	4.2	35.7%	46.2%	16.4%	1.2%	0.5%	1,028

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		4.0	29.7%	45.2%	22.2%	2.3%	0.6%	1,171
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.2	35.8%	45.7%	17.1%	1.1%	0.3%	1,055
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.6	13.2%	43.4%	34.0%	7.5%	1.9%	53
	2010	4.1	35.4%	46.2%	12.3%	1.5%	4.6%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.0	28.2%	46.2%	22.6%	2.4%	0.6%	1,186
No disability	2004
	2010	4.1	35.1%	46.3%	16.7%	1.3%	0.6%	1,081
Disability	2004	4.0	44.2%	23.3%	25.6%	4.7%	2.3%	43
	2010	4.2	38.8%	41.8%	17.3%	1.0%	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Asian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		4.0	29.0%	44.3%	23.9%	2.1%	0.7%	1,035
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	35.8%	45.4%	16.9%	1.3%	0.7%	1,031
Non-Traditional	2004	4.0	28.8%	48.6%	17.5%	4.7%	0.5%	212
	2010	4.1	32.4%	50.0%	16.2%	1.4%	.	148

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.8	20.0%	42.8%	33.3%	3.3%	0.6%	1,231
2004
2010	4.0	29.3%	44.8%	23.4%	1.8%	0.7%	1,177

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.8	18.9%	41.8%	36.7%	2.4%	0.3%	594
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	26.3%	46.5%	25.0%	1.6%	0.5%	551
Female	2004	3.8	21.0%	43.8%	30.1%	4.2%	0.8%	637
	2010	4.0	31.9%	43.3%	22.0%	1.9%	0.8%	626

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.4	7.2%	42.0%	37.7%	11.6%	1.4%	69
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.7	22.1%	36.4%	35.1%	3.9%	2.6%	77
Asian	2004	3.6	12.8%	36.9%	47.6%	2.7%	.	187
	2010	3.9	21.8%	53.0%	23.5%	1.3%	0.3%	298
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.6	11.1%	52.8%	25.0%	8.3%	2.8%	36
	2010	4.0	32.3%	41.9%	22.6%	3.2%	.	31
White/Caucasian	2004	3.9	22.6%	44.7%	30.1%	2.2%	0.4%	845
	2010	4.1	32.8%	43.3%	22.1%	1.5%	0.3%	732

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.8	20.7%	43.5%	31.7%	3.4%	0.6%	1,105
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	32.9%	41.3%	23.0%	1.9%	0.8%	833
International student	2004	3.6	13.5%	36.5%	47.6%	2.4%	.	126
	2010	3.9	20.6%	53.2%	24.4%	1.5%	0.3%	344

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.7	19.9%	37.5%	36.9%	5.3%	0.3%	301
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.9	28.3%	42.2%	24.3%	3.4%	1.8%	325
Middle class	2004	3.8	19.1%	45.2%	32.9%	2.2%	0.6%	635
	2010	4.0	29.9%	46.4%	22.4%	1.3%	.	545
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.8	22.3%	43.5%	30.0%	3.5%	0.7%	283
	2010	4.0	30.4%	43.9%	24.9%	0.7%	.	289

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.8	25.3%	37.4%	33.9%	2.9%	0.6%	174
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.9	28.3%	40.2%	29.1%	2.4%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	3.8	19.1%	43.9%	33.0%	3.3%	0.6%	1,047
	2010	4.0	29.5%	45.5%	22.8%	1.7%	0.6%	1,025

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.8	20.5%	43.0%	33.0%	3.0%	0.5%	1,156
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	30.1%	44.9%	23.2%	1.5%	0.3%	1,053
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.5	9.6%	40.4%	38.5%	9.6%	1.9%	52
	2010	3.8	29.2%	38.5%	23.1%	3.1%	6.2%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.8	19.7%	44.1%	32.6%	3.1%	0.5%	1,171
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	29.6%	45.0%	22.8%	1.9%	0.6%	1,079
Disability	2004	3.5	23.8%	16.7%	47.6%	9.5%	2.4%	42
	2010	3.9	26.5%	41.8%	30.6%	.	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.8	19.7%	41.7%	34.7%	3.3%	0.6%	1,022
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	29.7%	44.4%	23.2%	1.9%	0.8%	1,027
Non-Traditional	2004	3.9	21.5%	48.3%	26.3%	3.3%	0.5%	209
	2010	4.0	26.7%	47.3%	25.3%	0.7%	.	150

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year	4.1	34.0%	46.6%	18.2%	0.9%	0.2%	1,252
2004
2010	4.2	38.3%	44.4%	15.7%	1.3%	0.4%	1,179

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		4.1	31.7%	44.2%	22.3%	1.3%	0.5%	602
Male	2004
	2010	4.1	30.9%	47.5%	19.3%	1.4%	0.9%	554
Female	2004	4.2	36.2%	48.9%	14.5%	0.5%	.	650
	2010	4.3	44.8%	41.6%	12.5%	1.1%	.	625

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		4.4	49.3%	38.0%	11.3%	1.4%	.	71
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.4	53.2%	36.4%	10.4%	.	.	77
Asian	2004	4.1	31.8%	43.8%	24.5%	.	.	192
	2010	4.1	30.1%	52.8%	16.1%	0.7%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	4.2	31.4%	54.3%	14.3%	.	.	35
	2010	4.3	46.7%	33.3%	20.0%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	33.1%	49.1%	16.6%	0.9%	0.2%	859
	2010	4.2	39.4%	42.6%	15.8%	1.8%	0.4%	734

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency		4.1	34.2%	47.2%	17.4%	1.0%	0.3%	1,124
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.2	41.7%	40.9%	15.2%	1.7%	0.5%	834
International student	2004	4.1	32.8%	42.2%	25.0%	.	.	128
	2010	4.1	29.9%	52.8%	16.8%	0.3%	0.3%	345

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		4.1	36.3%	43.1%	17.3%	2.3%	1.0%	306
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.2	42.4%	42.4%	13.1%	1.5%	0.6%	328
Middle class	2004	4.1	31.3%	49.4%	18.8%	0.5%	.	648
	2010	4.2	36.5%	44.9%	17.1%	1.1%	0.4%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.2	37.1%	45.5%	17.5%	.	.	286
	2010	4.2	37.2%	45.2%	16.6%	1.0%	.	290

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.1	36.4%	46.0%	14.8%	1.1%	1.7%	176
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.2	39.4%	44.1%	15.0%	1.6%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	4.1	33.5%	47.1%	18.7%	0.8%	.	1,066
	2010	4.2	38.0%	44.6%	15.9%	1.2%	0.4%	1,027

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		4.1	33.8%	47.2%	18.0%	0.9%	0.2%	1,174
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.2	37.9%	44.9%	15.6%	1.3%	0.3%	1,053
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	4.1	37.0%	42.6%	18.5%	.	1.9%	54
	2010	4.4	52.3%	33.8%	12.3%	.	1.5%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.1	33.5%	47.8%	17.7%	0.8%	0.3%	1,191
No disability	2004
	2010	4.2	38.2%	44.5%	15.5%	1.4%	0.4%	1,081
Disability	2004	4.1	46.5%	23.3%	27.9%	2.3%	.	43
	2010	4.2	38.8%	42.9%	17.3%	.	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: White students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		4.1	34.3%	45.7%	19.0%	0.8%	0.2%	1,037
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.2	38.2%	43.9%	16.1%	1.4%	0.5%	1,030
Non-Traditional	2004	4.1	32.6%	51.2%	14.4%	1.4%	0.5%	215
	2010	4.2	38.9%	47.7%	12.8%	0.7%	.	149

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	4.0	30.3%	46.4%	19.8%	2.9%	0.6%	1,249
2004
2010	4.1	36.3%	45.0%	16.3%	1.7%	0.7%	1,179

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender		4.0	29.8%	45.9%	20.6%	3.0%	0.7%	601
Male	2004
	2010	4.1	34.0%	47.7%	16.1%	1.4%	0.7%	553
Female	2004	4.0	30.9%	46.8%	19.0%	2.8%	0.6%	648
	2010	4.2	38.3%	42.7%	16.5%	1.9%	0.6%	626

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.8	18.6%	54.3%	18.6%	5.7%	2.9%	70
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.1	37.7%	37.7%	20.8%	2.6%	1.3%	77
Asian	2004	3.7	16.2%	43.5%	33.5%	4.7%	2.1%	191
	2010	4.0	25.7%	53.0%	19.0%	1.7%	0.7%	300
Hispanic/Latino	2004	4.0	22.2%	58.3%	13.9%	5.6%	.	36
	2010	4.0	40.0%	23.3%	33.3%	3.3%	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	34.5%	46.4%	16.9%	2.1%	0.1%	858
	2010	4.2	40.5%	43.8%	14.1%	1.4%	0.3%	733

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency		4.1	31.6%	46.3%	18.7%	2.8%	0.5%	1,122
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.2	41.1%	41.8%	15.1%	1.4%	0.6%	833
International student	2004	3.8	18.9%	46.5%	29.1%	3.9%	1.6%	127
	2010	4.0	24.9%	52.9%	19.1%	2.3%	0.9%	346

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		4.0	33.2%	37.1%	25.4%	3.3%	1.0%	307
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	36.1%	44.0%	15.6%	3.1%	1.2%	327
Middle class	2004	4.0	27.2%	51.0%	18.9%	2.2%	0.8%	647
	2010	4.2	36.6%	45.2%	16.9%	1.1%	0.2%	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.1	34.3%	45.9%	16.3%	3.5%	.	283
	2010	4.2	37.2%	45.2%	15.5%	1.4%	0.7%	290

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.0	33.5%	39.8%	23.3%	1.7%	1.7%	176
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	34.6%	44.9%	16.5%	3.9%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	4.0	29.7%	47.6%	19.3%	2.9%	0.5%	1,063
	2010	4.2	36.8%	45.0%	16.2%	1.4%	0.7%	1,027

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		4.0	31.0%	46.4%	19.3%	2.7%	0.6%	1,172
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.2	36.7%	45.5%	15.8%	1.4%	0.5%	1,054
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.8	18.9%	47.2%	30.2%	1.9%	1.9%	53
	2010	4.0	38.5%	38.5%	15.4%	3.1%	4.6%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.0	29.9%	47.3%	19.5%	2.7%	0.6%	1,189
No disability	2004
	2010	4.1	36.1%	45.2%	16.2%	1.9%	0.6%	1,081
Disability	2004	3.9	38.1%	26.2%	28.6%	4.8%	2.4%	42
	2010	4.2	38.8%	42.9%	17.3%	.	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: International students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		4.0	30.0%	46.3%	20.2%	2.8%	0.7%	1,035
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	36.5%	44.4%	16.7%	1.6%	0.8%	1,029
Non-Traditional	2004	4.1	31.8%	46.7%	17.8%	3.3%	0.5%	214
	2010	4.2	34.7%	49.3%	13.3%	2.7%	.	150

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	4.0	28.1%	51.0%	18.5%	2.0%	0.3%	1,252
2004
2010	4.1	35.0%	46.6%	16.7%	1.4%	0.4%	1,181

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		4.0	28.0%	48.5%	21.8%	1.7%	.	600
Male	2004
	2010	4.1	31.9%	48.4%	18.4%	0.5%	0.7%	554
Female	2004	4.1	28.2%	53.4%	15.5%	2.3%	0.6%	652
	2010	4.2	37.6%	45.0%	15.2%	2.1%	0.2%	627

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.9	11.3%	67.6%	16.9%	4.2%	.	71
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.2	33.3%	48.7%	17.9%	.	.	78
Asian	2004	3.8	16.1%	49.5%	33.3%	1.0%	.	192
	2010	4.1	26.4%	53.5%	19.4%	0.3%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.9	22.2%	58.3%	13.9%	2.8%	2.8%	36
	2010	4.2	40.0%	40.0%	20.0%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	32.1%	50.8%	14.8%	2.0%	0.3%	858
	2010	4.2	38.6%	44.2%	15.2%	1.6%	0.3%	735

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency		4.1	29.1%	51.4%	17.1%	2.0%	0.4%	1,124
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.2	38.9%	43.8%	15.3%	1.6%	0.5%	836
International student	2004	3.9	19.5%	47.7%	31.3%	1.6%	.	128
	2010	4.0	25.5%	53.3%	20.0%	0.9%	0.3%	345

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		4.0	29.3%	48.0%	20.1%	2.3%	0.3%	304
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	35.2%	45.8%	15.8%	2.1%	1.2%	330
Middle class	2004	4.0	26.6%	53.1%	18.0%	2.0%	0.3%	651
	2010	4.1	33.5%	47.8%	17.5%	1.3%	.	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.1	30.5%	49.8%	17.9%	1.4%	0.4%	285
	2010	4.2	37.7%	45.0%	16.6%	0.7%	.	289

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.1	32.2%	46.9%	19.2%	1.1%	0.6%	177
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	34.6%	44.1%	19.7%	1.6%	.	127
Not first generation	2004	4.0	27.4%	51.9%	18.3%	2.1%	0.3%	1,065
	2010	4.1	35.0%	47.0%	16.4%	1.3%	0.4%	1,027

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		4.1	28.6%	51.2%	18.3%	1.5%	0.3%	1,174
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.2	34.9%	46.9%	16.9%	1.0%	0.2%	1,053
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.8	20.4%	50.0%	20.4%	9.3%	.	54
	2010	4.1	40.9%	39.4%	12.1%	3.0%	4.5%	66

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.0	27.8%	51.7%	18.3%	1.9%	0.3%	1,189
No disability	2004
	2010	4.2	35.4%	46.4%	16.6%	1.3%	0.4%	1,083
Disability	2004	4.1	35.6%	37.8%	24.4%	2.2%	.	45
	2010	4.1	30.6%	49.0%	17.3%	2.0%	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Female students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		4.0	27.6%	50.6%	19.3%	2.1%	0.4%	1,037
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	35.2%	46.0%	17.1%	1.3%	0.5%	1,029
Non-Traditional	2004	4.1	30.7%	53.0%	14.9%	1.4%	.	215
	2010	4.2	33.6%	50.7%	13.8%	2.0%	.	152

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	4.1	29.2%	48.5%	21.4%	1.0%	.	1,248
2004
2010	4.1	35.9%	44.6%	18.4%	0.8%	0.3%	1,177

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		4.0	25.5%	46.8%	25.8%	1.8%	.	600
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	28.7%	47.5%	22.0%	1.3%	0.5%	550
Female	2004	4.1	32.6%	50.0%	17.3%	0.2%	.	648
	2010	4.3	42.1%	42.1%	15.3%	0.5%	.	627

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		4.2	30.0%	57.1%	11.4%	1.4%	.	70
African American/Black	2004
	2010	4.2	40.8%	40.8%	18.4%	.	.	76
Asian	2004	3.8	15.8%	44.2%	39.5%	0.5%	.	190
	2010	4.0	24.5%	54.0%	20.5%	0.7%	0.3%	298
Hispanic/Latino	2004	4.1	27.0%	51.4%	21.6%	.	.	37
	2010	4.2	40.0%	36.7%	23.3%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	32.1%	49.8%	17.2%	0.9%	.	856
	2010	4.2	39.6%	41.7%	17.4%	1.1%	0.1%	734

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		4.1	30.6%	49.0%	19.4%	1.0%	.	1,120
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.2	40.8%	41.0%	16.9%	1.1%	0.2%	834
International student	2004	3.8	16.4%	43.8%	39.1%	0.8%	.	128
	2010	4.0	23.9%	53.4%	22.2%	0.3%	0.3%	343

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		4.0	30.0%	44.6%	23.8%	1.7%	.	303
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.2	37.2%	45.7%	15.9%	0.9%	0.3%	328
Middle class	2004	4.0	27.4%	50.4%	21.5%	0.8%	.	647
	2010	4.1	36.0%	43.4%	19.8%	0.7%	.	541
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.1	32.2%	49.0%	18.5%	0.3%	.	286
	2010	4.1	35.2%	44.8%	19.0%	0.7%	0.3%	290

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		4.1	30.5%	46.3%	22.0%	1.1%	.	177
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.1	33.3%	44.4%	20.6%	1.6%	.	126
Not first generation	2004	4.1	28.8%	49.1%	21.2%	0.8%	.	1,061
	2010	4.2	36.3%	44.6%	18.2%	0.7%	0.2%	1,026

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		4.1	29.1%	48.7%	21.2%	0.9%	.	1,172
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.2	36.0%	44.8%	18.2%	0.9%	0.2%	1,050
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	4.1	32.7%	46.2%	21.2%	.	.	52
	2010	4.3	48.5%	37.9%	12.1%	.	1.5%	66

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.1	28.8%	49.3%	21.1%	0.8%	.	1,186
No disability	2004
	2010	4.2	36.0%	44.5%	18.4%	0.9%	0.2%	1,079
Disability	2004	4.1	38.6%	34.1%	25.0%	2.3%	.	44
	2010	4.1	34.7%	45.9%	18.4%	.	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Male students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		4.0	29.2%	47.0%	22.9%	0.8%	.	1,033
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.1	35.7%	44.6%	18.6%	0.9%	0.3%	1,028
Non-Traditional	2004	4.1	28.8%	55.3%	14.0%	1.9%	.	215
	2010	4.2	36.9%	45.0%	17.4%	0.7%	.	149

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.5	12.6%	35.5%	45.4%	4.9%	1.5%	1,236
2004
2010	3.9	26.8%	42.1%	28.0%	2.2%	0.9%	1,170

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.5	12.1%	30.6%	50.9%	4.8%	1.7%	588
Male	2004
	2010	3.9	23.6%	44.0%	28.9%	2.4%	1.1%	550
Female	2004	3.6	13.1%	40.0%	40.4%	5.1%	1.4%	648
	2010	4.0	29.5%	40.3%	27.3%	2.1%	0.8%	620

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race Ethnicity		3.4	8.6%	34.3%	50.0%	5.7%	1.4%	70
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.7	17.3%	41.3%	34.7%	4.0%	2.7%	75
Asian	2004	3.3	5.3%	23.0%	68.4%	2.7%	0.5%	187
	2010	3.8	18.2%	50.7%	28.7%	1.4%	1.0%	296
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.1	.	24.3%	67.6%	5.4%	2.7%	37
	2010	3.9	27.6%	31.0%	41.4%	.	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	3.6	14.5%	40.0%	38.9%	4.9%	1.6%	850
	2010	4.0	31.0%	40.0%	26.0%	2.5%	0.5%	732

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.6	13.7%	37.0%	42.2%	5.4%	1.6%	1,113
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	30.7%	39.0%	27.0%	2.5%	0.8%	831
International student	2004	3.2	2.4%	22.0%	74.0%	0.8%	0.8%	123
	2010	3.8	17.1%	49.6%	30.7%	1.5%	1.2%	339

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.4	12.7%	27.7%	49.0%	8.7%	2.0%	300
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.8	24.8%	39.4%	30.9%	4.0%	0.9%	327
Middle class	2004	3.6	11.9%	39.5%	43.5%	3.6%	1.6%	641
	2010	3.9	27.5%	43.3%	26.6%	1.7%	0.9%	538
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.6	14.8%	34.9%	45.1%	4.2%	1.1%	284
	2010	4.0	28.6%	41.5%	28.2%	1.4%	0.3%	287

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		3.5	14.0%	27.3%	50.0%	8.1%	0.6%	172
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.9	28.1%	40.6%	28.9%	1.6%	0.8%	128
Not first generation	2004	3.5	12.5%	36.9%	44.5%	4.5%	1.7%	1,055
	2010	3.9	26.8%	42.1%	28.0%	2.4%	0.7%	1,018

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.6	13.1%	36.1%	45.7%	4.1%	0.9%	1,162
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	3.9	27.6%	42.2%	27.6%	2.1%	0.6%	1,045
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	2.8	7.5%	22.6%	30.2%	24.5%	15.1%	53
	2010	3.7	27.7%	30.8%	30.8%	6.2%	4.6%	65

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.5	12.9%	35.6%	45.4%	4.8%	1.4%	1,174
No disability	2004
	2010	3.9	27.0%	42.1%	28.2%	1.9%	0.9%	1,072
Disability	2004	3.3	8.9%	33.3%	40.0%	11.1%	6.7%	45
	2010	3.8	24.5%	41.8%	26.5%	6.1%	1.0%	98

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Gay, lesbian and bisexual students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		3.5	12.5%	33.9%	47.1%	4.8%	1.7%	1,028
Traditional	2004
	2010	3.9	27.0%	41.8%	28.0%	2.2%	1.0%	1,023
Non-Traditional	2004	3.6	13.0%	43.3%	37.0%	5.8%	1.0%	208
	2010	3.9	25.2%	43.5%	28.6%	2.0%	0.7%	147

Note: Transgendered students were included in 2004 question wording, but not 2010 wording.

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.7	19.4%	38.9%	38.7%	2.5%	0.5%	1,245
2004
2010	4.0	30.3%	42.5%	25.6%	1.3%	0.3%	1,179

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.7	19.4%	38.0%	40.0%	1.8%	0.7%	597
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	28.0%	45.7%	25.1%	0.5%	0.7%	554
Female	2004	3.7	19.4%	39.7%	37.5%	3.1%	0.3%	648
	2010	4.0	32.3%	39.7%	26.1%	1.9%	.	625

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.5	11.3%	39.4%	43.7%	4.2%	1.4%	71
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.9	26.0%	41.6%	32.5%	.	.	77
Asian	2004	3.7	14.1%	41.4%	42.9%	1.6%	.	191
	2010	4.0	26.1%	51.5%	21.7%	0.3%	0.3%	299
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.7	16.2%	37.8%	45.9%	.	.	37
	2010	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	3.8	21.1%	40.1%	35.9%	2.2%	0.6%	852
	2010	4.0	32.1%	40.1%	25.6%	1.9%	0.3%	735

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.8	20.2%	38.8%	37.8%	2.6%	0.5%	1,118
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	32.4%	38.5%	27.1%	1.7%	0.4%	834
International student	2004	3.6	12.6%	39.4%	46.5%	1.6%	.	127
	2010	4.0	25.2%	52.2%	22.0%	0.3%	0.3%	345

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.7	19.9%	32.4%	43.5%	3.6%	0.7%	306
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.0	28.4%	42.4%	27.1%	1.8%	0.3%	328
Middle class	2004	3.8	18.4%	41.6%	37.4%	2.2%	0.5%	642
	2010	4.0	30.5%	42.8%	25.0%	1.3%	0.4%	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.8	21.4%	40.4%	36.1%	1.8%	0.4%	285
	2010	4.1	32.9%	40.8%	25.6%	0.7%	.	289

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.8	25.6%	36.4%	34.7%	3.4%	.	176
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	31.7%	42.9%	23.8%	0.8%	0.8%	126
Not first generation	2004	3.7	18.4%	39.5%	39.3%	2.3%	0.6%	1,059
	2010	4.0	30.2%	42.3%	25.9%	1.4%	0.2%	1,026

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.8	19.7%	39.3%	38.0%	2.6%	0.5%	1,169
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	30.7%	42.8%	25.0%	1.2%	0.3%	1,053
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.6	17.0%	30.2%	52.8%	.	.	53
	2010	4.0	35.9%	31.3%	28.1%	3.1%	1.6%	64

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.7	19.0%	39.8%	38.3%	2.4%	0.5%	1,183
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	30.2%	42.8%	25.4%	1.3%	0.3%	1,081
Disability	2004	3.8	29.5%	20.5%	45.5%	4.5%	.	44
	2010	4.0	31.6%	38.8%	27.6%	1.0%	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Christian students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.7	19.4%	38.3%	39.4%	2.4%	0.5%	1,035
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	30.8%	41.6%	25.9%	1.4%	0.3%	1,028
Non-Traditional	2004	3.8	19.5%	41.9%	35.2%	2.9%	0.5%	210
	2010	4.0	26.5%	48.3%	23.8%	0.7%	0.7%	151

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	4.0	25.7%	49.4%	21.1%	3.0%	0.8%	1,244
2004
2010	4.0	30.6%	43.5%	22.3%	3.1%	0.4%	1,178

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.9	23.4%	46.8%	26.4%	2.5%	0.8%	594
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	27.7%	45.3%	24.6%	1.8%	0.5%	552
Female	2004	4.0	27.8%	51.7%	16.3%	3.4%	0.8%	650
	2010	4.0	33.1%	42.0%	20.3%	4.3%	0.3%	626

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*		3.7	15.3%	51.4%	20.8%	9.7%	2.8%	72
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.7	19.5%	41.6%	33.8%	3.9%	1.3%	77
Asian	2004	3.6	10.1%	44.7%	42.6%	2.1%	0.5%	188
	2010	4.0	24.2%	50.8%	23.9%	0.7%	0.3%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.5	10.8%	40.5%	37.8%	10.8%	.	37
	2010	4.0	33.3%	33.3%	33.3%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	4.1	30.8%	50.5%	15.6%	2.5%	0.7%	854
	2010	4.1	34.1%	42.3%	19.6%	3.9%	0.1%	736

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		4.0	27.5%	50.1%	18.2%	3.2%	0.9%	1,119
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	33.7%	40.4%	21.3%	4.2%	0.5%	835
International student	2004	3.6	9.6%	42.4%	47.2%	0.8%	.	125
	2010	4.0	23.0%	51.3%	24.8%	0.6%	0.3%	343

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.9	26.2%	43.6%	22.3%	5.9%	2.0%	305
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.0	29.4%	43.7%	20.5%	5.5%	0.9%	327
Middle class	2004	4.0	24.5%	51.6%	21.3%	2.0%	0.6%	644
	2010	4.0	30.5%	44.2%	22.9%	2.4%	.	545
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	4.1	28.5%	50.4%	19.0%	2.1%	.	284
	2010	4.1	33.3%	41.3%	23.3%	2.1%	.	288

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		4.0	27.6%	44.8%	24.1%	2.9%	0.6%	174
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	29.4%	44.4%	23.8%	2.4%	.	126
Not first generation	2004	4.0	25.5%	50.1%	20.5%	3.0%	0.8%	1,061
	2010	4.0	30.8%	43.6%	22.0%	3.3%	0.3%	1,026

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation		4.0	26.4%	48.9%	20.9%	2.9%	0.9%	1,169
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	31.1%	43.9%	21.7%	3.1%	0.2%	1,052
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.8	15.4%	59.6%	19.2%	5.8%	.	52
	2010	3.9	30.8%	35.4%	26.2%	4.6%	3.1%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		4.0	25.9%	49.4%	21.3%	2.8%	0.6%	1,181
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	30.7%	43.7%	22.5%	2.7%	0.4%	1,080
Disability	2004	3.8	23.9%	50.0%	10.9%	8.7%	6.5%	46
	2010	3.9	28.6%	41.8%	20.4%	8.2%	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Nontraditional students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		4.0	24.8%	49.8%	22.5%	2.2%	0.7%	1,032
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	31.0%	43.5%	23.0%	2.0%	0.5%	1,027
Non-Traditional	2004	4.0	30.2%	47.2%	14.6%	6.6%	1.4%	212
	2010	3.9	27.8%	43.7%	17.9%	10.6%	.	151

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.7	15.9%	42.3%	36.5%	4.4%	1.0%	1,241
2004
2010	3.9	28.6%	41.7%	26.1%	2.6%	0.9%	1,173

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.7	16.1%	40.2%	38.7%	4.0%	1.0%	595
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	26.9%	45.5%	25.5%	1.1%	1.1%	550
Female	2004	3.7	15.6%	44.3%	34.5%	4.6%	0.9%	646
	2010	3.9	30.2%	38.4%	26.6%	4.0%	0.8%	623

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.4	5.6%	40.3%	41.7%	11.1%	1.4%	72
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.6	17.1%	35.5%	35.5%	10.5%	1.3%	76
Asian	2004	3.5	11.2%	34.0%	50.0%	3.7%	1.1%	188
	2010	3.9	22.6%	49.8%	26.3%	0.3%	1.0%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.3	2.7%	29.7%	62.2%	2.7%	2.7%	37
	2010	3.9	31.0%	31.0%	37.9%	.	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	3.8	18.2%	45.5%	31.6%	4.0%	0.6%	850
	2010	4.0	32.2%	40.0%	24.3%	2.9%	0.7%	733

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.7	16.9%	43.5%	34.0%	4.6%	1.0%	1,117
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	31.6%	38.3%	25.6%	3.5%	1.0%	831
International student	2004	3.4	6.5%	31.5%	58.9%	2.4%	0.8%	124
	2010	3.9	21.3%	50.0%	27.2%	0.6%	0.9%	342

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.5	16.4%	32.9%	42.1%	6.3%	2.3%	304
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.8	27.7%	40.0%	22.5%	8.0%	1.8%	325
Middle class	2004	3.7	14.8%	46.0%	34.5%	3.9%	0.8%	641
	2010	4.0	29.5%	42.7%	26.7%	0.9%	0.2%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.8	17.5%	44.6%	34.4%	3.5%	.	285
	2010	4.0	29.3%	40.4%	29.6%	.	0.7%	287

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.6	18.0%	35.5%	39.0%	4.1%	3.5%	172
First generation student	2004
	2010	3.9	30.2%	36.5%	28.6%	4.0%	0.8%	126
Not first generation	2004	3.7	15.5%	43.6%	35.9%	4.4%	0.6%	1,060
	2010	4.0	28.7%	42.1%	25.9%	2.5%	0.8%	1,022

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.7	16.2%	43.0%	36.3%	3.6%	0.9%	1,165
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	29.0%	42.1%	25.8%	2.5%	0.6%	1,047
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.3	9.4%	32.1%	37.7%	18.9%	1.9%	53
	2010	3.8	32.3%	27.7%	27.7%	7.7%	4.6%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.7	15.9%	42.7%	36.6%	4.0%	0.8%	1,179
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	28.8%	42.4%	25.8%	2.0%	0.9%	1,075
Disability	2004	3.4	15.6%	35.6%	31.1%	13.3%	4.4%	45
	2010	3.8	26.5%	33.7%	29.6%	9.2%	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Poor/working class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		3.7	16.1%	41.5%	37.6%	4.0%	0.9%	1,034
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	28.7%	41.9%	26.3%	2.1%	1.0%	1,024
Non-Traditional	2004	3.7	15.0%	46.4%	30.9%	6.3%	1.4%	207
	2010	3.9	28.2%	40.3%	24.8%	6.0%	0.7%	149

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.8	18.2%	48.4%	31.2%	1.8%	0.4%	1,242
2004
2010	4.0	29.5%	43.3%	26.3%	0.7%	0.3%	1,174

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.8	17.0%	45.3%	35.4%	1.9%	0.5%	594
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	26.9%	45.0%	26.9%	0.7%	0.5%	551
Female	2004	3.9	19.3%	51.2%	27.5%	1.7%	0.3%	648
	2010	4.0	31.8%	41.7%	25.8%	0.6%	.	623

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.7	13.9%	47.2%	37.5%	1.4%	.	72
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.8	19.7%	39.5%	40.8%	.	.	76
Asian	2004	3.5	10.1%	38.3%	48.4%	2.1%	1.1%	188
	2010	3.9	22.6%	50.8%	25.9%	0.3%	0.3%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.4	2.7%	43.2%	51.4%	.	2.7%	37
	2010	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	3.9	20.3%	52.5%	25.5%	1.6%	.	851
	2010	4.1	33.1%	41.6%	24.3%	1.0%	0.1%	734

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	19.3%	49.9%	28.7%	1.7%	0.4%	1,118
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	32.8%	40.1%	26.0%	0.8%	0.2%	832
International student	2004	3.5	8.1%	34.7%	54.0%	2.4%	0.8%	124
	2010	3.9	21.3%	50.9%	27.2%	0.3%	0.3%	342

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.8	18.8%	43.4%	33.9%	3.3%	0.7%	304
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.0	28.6%	44.3%	25.2%	1.5%	0.3%	325
Middle class	2004	3.8	16.3%	51.5%	30.3%	1.4%	0.5%	643
	2010	4.0	29.8%	43.6%	26.1%	0.4%	0.2%	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.9	21.8%	47.2%	29.9%	1.1%	.	284
	2010	4.0	30.3%	40.8%	28.6%	0.3%	.	287

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student		3.8	18.6%	47.7%	30.2%	2.3%	1.2%	172
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	30.4%	41.6%	27.2%	0.8%	.	125
Not first generation	2004	3.8	18.1%	48.6%	31.3%	1.7%	0.3%	1,061
	2010	4.0	29.3%	43.5%	26.4%	0.7%	0.2%	1,024

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.8	18.4%	48.9%	30.7%	1.8%	0.3%	1,166
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	29.8%	43.6%	25.7%	0.8%	0.2%	1,048
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.7	17.0%	43.4%	37.7%	.	1.9%	53
	2010	4.0	33.8%	32.3%	32.3%	.	1.5%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.8	18.2%	48.6%	31.3%	1.7%	0.3%	1,180
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	29.5%	43.5%	26.2%	0.7%	0.2%	1,076
Disability	2004	3.7	20.0%	46.7%	24.4%	4.4%	4.4%	45
	2010	4.0	29.6%	40.8%	27.6%	1.0%	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Middle class students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.8	18.3%	47.0%	32.6%	1.8%	0.3%	1,033
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	29.8%	42.5%	26.6%	0.8%	0.3%	1,026
Non-Traditional	2004	3.9	17.7%	55.5%	24.4%	1.4%	1.0%	209
	2010	4.0	27.0%	48.6%	24.3%	.	.	148

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.9	21.6%	46.3%	31.6%	0.4%	0.1%	1,236
2004
2010	4.0	31.4%	42.1%	25.6%	0.6%	0.3%	1,171

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.9	20.9%	43.7%	35.2%	0.2%	.	593
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	27.9%	44.0%	26.8%	0.7%	0.5%	548
Female	2004	3.9	22.2%	48.7%	28.3%	0.6%	0.2%	643
	2010	4.1	34.5%	40.4%	24.6%	0.5%	.	623

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		4.0	25.7%	44.3%	30.0%	.	.	70
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.9	26.3%	36.8%	35.5%	1.3%	.	76
Asian	2004	3.6	12.8%	38.3%	48.4%	0.5%	.	188
	2010	4.0	23.3%	50.0%	26.0%	0.3%	0.3%	296
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.6	8.1%	43.2%	48.6%	.	.	37
	2010	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
White/Caucasian	2004	4.0	22.7%	50.2%	26.8%	0.4%	.	847
	2010	4.1	35.0%	40.6%	23.6%	0.7%	0.1%	732

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.9	22.8%	47.7%	29.0%	0.4%	0.1%	1,112
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.1	35.3%	38.7%	25.1%	0.7%	0.2%	830
International student	2004	3.5	10.5%	33.9%	55.6%	.	.	124
	2010	3.9	22.0%	50.4%	27.0%	0.3%	0.3%	341

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background		3.9	24.2%	41.4%	33.8%	0.7%	.	302
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	4.1	33.3%	42.9%	22.5%	0.9%	0.3%	324
Middle class	2004	3.9	19.4%	49.8%	30.5%	0.2%	0.2%	639
	2010	4.0	30.1%	42.8%	26.5%	0.6%	.	544
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.9	23.6%	44.4%	31.3%	0.7%	.	284
	2010	4.0	32.3%	38.9%	28.1%	0.4%	0.4%	285

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		3.9	25.7%	40.9%	33.3%	.	.	171
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	33.3%	38.9%	27.0%	0.8%	.	126
Not first generation	2004	3.9	20.9%	47.3%	31.2%	0.5%	0.1%	1,056
	2010	4.0	31.2%	42.5%	25.6%	0.6%	0.2%	1,020

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.9	21.5%	46.5%	31.6%	0.4%	0.1%	1,160
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	31.6%	42.7%	24.9%	0.7%	0.2%	1,045
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	4.0	24.5%	47.2%	28.3%	.	.	53
	2010	4.0	40.0%	27.7%	30.8%	.	1.5%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status		3.9	21.4%	46.7%	31.5%	0.3%	0.1%	1,175
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	31.0%	42.9%	25.3%	0.6%	0.2%	1,073
Disability	2004	4.0	31.8%	36.4%	29.5%	2.3%	.	44
	2010	4.0	35.7%	33.7%	28.6%	1.0%	1.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*		3.9	21.8%	45.2%	32.5%	0.5%	0.1%	1,029
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	31.6%	41.6%	25.9%	0.6%	0.3%	1,023
Non-Traditional	2004	3.9	20.8%	51.7%	27.5%	.	.	207
	2010	4.1	30.4%	45.3%	23.6%	0.7%	.	148

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Year*	3.7	16.6%	43.6%	32.3%	5.3%	2.2%	1,237
2004
2010	4.0	29.3%	42.5%	23.4%	3.7%	1.1%	1,177

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*		3.7	16.2%	41.5%	36.1%	4.4%	1.9%	593
Male	2004
	2010	4.0	27.6%	44.5%	24.5%	2.7%	0.7%	551
Female	2004	3.7	16.9%	45.5%	28.9%	6.2%	2.5%	644
	2010	4.0	30.8%	40.7%	22.5%	4.5%	1.4%	626

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity		3.3	7.1%	42.9%	30.0%	12.9%	7.1%	70
African American/Black	2004
	2010	3.6	17.9%	38.5%	33.3%	9.0%	1.3%	78
Asian	2004	3.6	9.7%	41.1%	45.9%	3.2%	.	185
	2010	4.0	24.2%	51.5%	22.9%	1.0%	0.3%	297
Hispanic/Latino	2004	3.2	.	41.7%	44.4%	8.3%	5.6%	36
	2010	4.0	33.3%	30.0%	36.7%	.	.	30
White/Caucasian	2004	3.8	19.2%	45.7%	28.5%	4.8%	1.8%	853
	2010	4.0	32.6%	40.5%	21.5%	4.4%	1.1%	734

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*		3.7	17.4%	44.3%	30.1%	5.8%	2.3%	1,114
U.S. resident	2004
	2010	4.0	32.0%	38.8%	23.1%	4.6%	1.4%	834
International student	2004	3.5	8.9%	36.6%	52.8%	0.8%	0.8%	123
	2010	3.9	22.7%	51.3%	24.2%	1.5%	0.3%	343

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*		3.5	16.3%	37.7%	33.0%	9.0%	4.0%	300
Poor/Working class	2004
	2010	3.9	29.0%	40.2%	23.8%	4.9%	2.1%	328
Middle class	2004	3.7	15.4%	46.5%	32.0%	4.5%	1.6%	641
	2010	4.0	29.3%	43.1%	23.8%	3.5%	0.4%	543
Upper middle/Upper class	2004	3.8	19.2%	43.7%	31.8%	3.5%	1.7%	286
	2010	4.0	30.9%	43.1%	22.6%	2.8%	0.7%	288

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*		3.6	17.0%	42.1%	31.0%	5.8%	4.1%	171
First generation student	2004
	2010	4.0	31.0%	39.7%	24.6%	4.8%	.	126
Not first generation	2004	3.7	16.5%	44.0%	32.4%	5.3%	1.9%	1,057
	2010	4.0	29.2%	43.0%	23.2%	3.5%	1.1%	1,026

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*		3.7	16.7%	43.9%	32.2%	5.1%	2.1%	1,163
Heterosexual	2004
	2010	4.0	29.5%	42.8%	23.1%	3.8%	0.8%	1,051
Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual	2004	3.5	13.2%	41.5%	28.3%	13.2%	3.8%	53
	2010	3.9	32.3%	40.0%	21.5%	1.5%	4.6%	65

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*		3.7	16.3%	44.6%	31.7%	5.4%	2.0%	1,176
No disability	2004
	2010	4.0	29.3%	42.7%	23.6%	3.3%	1.0%	1,079
Disability	2004	3.5	22.7%	22.7%	43.2%	4.5%	6.8%	44
	2010	3.9	29.6%	39.8%	21.4%	7.1%	2.0%	98

Grad Program Supportiveness: Students with children		Mean	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age		3.7	16.0%	43.0%	34.0%	5.0%	2.0%	1,028
Traditional	2004
	2010	4.0	29.7%	43.3%	23.2%	2.8%	1.0%	1,028
Non-Traditional	2004	3.7	19.6%	46.4%	23.9%	7.2%	2.9%	209
	2010	3.8	26.8%	36.9%	24.8%	9.4%	2.0%	149

Back to Top

 

For more information on the Campus Climate Survey trends contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: July, 2011

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page