North Carolina State University
2010 Campus Climate Survey (Graduate)
Section E: Campus Climate

Tables of Results
by Student Demographic Profile

The following tables provide results to questions in Section E: Campus Climate, broken down by gender, race/ethnicity, residency, socioeconomic background, college generation, sexual orientation, disability status, and age1. Statistically significant differences (p>.05) between groups (e.g., between women and men) are noted with an asterisk (*). For exact question wording for this section, click here.

To download an MS Word document with results by demographic profile, click here.

Campus Climate Survey Table of Contents | Annotated Questionnaire | Section E by Academic College

E1a-c: Faculty respect for graduate students	E2a-u: NC State supportive for various student groups
E1d-f: Graduate student respect for faculty	E3a-u: Graduate program supportive for various student groups
E1g-h: Undergraduate student respect for teaching assistants	E4a-g: Negative, inappropriate, or stereotypical statements by faculty/instructors
E1i-j: Graduate student respect for other graduate students	E5a-g: Negative, inappropriate, or stereotypical statements by graduate students
E1k-l: Friendships between graduate students with different backgrounds	E6a-g: Negative, inappropriate, or stereotypical statements by staff

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	42.4%	49.0%	7.2%	1.3%	1,193

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.3	42.6%	49.4%	6.3%	1.8%	559
.....Male
.....Female	3.3	42.3%	48.7%	8.0%	0.9%	634

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	3.2	31.6%	55.7%	11.4%	1.3%	79
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.4	44.7%	50.0%	4.3%	1.0%	302
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.5	51.6%	45.2%	3.2%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.3	42.2%	48.0%	8.2%	1.6%	742
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.4	43.2%	51.4%	5.4%	.	37
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*	3.3	40.9%	48.9%	8.7%	1.5%	843
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.4	46.0%	49.4%	3.7%	0.9%	350

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.3	40.2%	48.5%	8.9%	2.4%	336
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.3	42.4%	49.9%	6.7%	0.9%	549
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.4	44.2%	48.3%	6.5%	1.0%	292

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.4	45.7%	48.0%	4.7%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.3	41.8%	49.3%	7.7%	1.2%	1,041

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	3.3	43.1%	48.7%	7.0%	1.2%	1,068
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.2	35.9%	51.6%	10.9%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.1	23.9%	63.0%	8.7%	4.3%	46

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.3	43.3%	48.6%	6.8%	1.3%	1,097
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.2	32.3%	54.2%	11.5%	2.1%	96

E1a: Faculty respect for grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age*	3.3	42.9%	49.2%	6.4%	1.4%	1,042
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.3	39.1%	47.7%	12.6%	0.7%	151

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	40.0%	49.7%	7.9%	2.4%	1,186

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.3	41.2%	50.0%	6.8%	2.0%	558
.....Male
.....Female	3.2	38.9%	49.5%	8.9%	2.7%	628

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	2.8	20.3%	50.6%	21.5%	7.6%	79
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.3	40.6%	49.5%	7.9%	2.0%	303
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.4	48.4%	41.9%	9.7%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.3	41.5%	49.8%	6.7%	2.0%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.3	38.9%	55.6%	2.8%	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency	3.3	39.2%	50.5%	7.9%	2.4%	835
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.3	41.9%	47.9%	8.0%	2.3%	351

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.2	36.5%	49.1%	9.9%	4.5%	334
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.3	40.6%	50.6%	6.8%	2.0%	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.3	42.3%	49.1%	7.9%	0.7%	291

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.2	37.0%	51.2%	9.4%	2.4%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.3	40.2%	49.6%	7.8%	2.3%	1,034

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.3	40.4%	50.1%	7.6%	1.9%	1,062
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.1	36.5%	46.0%	11.1%	6.3%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.0	28.3%	54.3%	8.7%	8.7%	46

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.3	40.5%	49.3%	8.2%	2.1%	1,090
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.2	34.4%	55.2%	5.2%	5.2%	96

E1b: Faculty respect for minority grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.3	41.0%	49.3%	7.6%	2.0%	1,036
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.1	32.7%	52.7%	10.0%	4.7%	150

E1c: Faculty respect for female students

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	42.3%	48.1%	8.1%	1.6%	1,192

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*	3.4	45.2%	48.1%	5.4%	1.3%	557
.....Male
.....Female	3.3	39.7%	48.0%	10.4%	1.9%	635

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.0	25.6%	55.1%	15.4%	3.8%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.4	45.9%	50.5%	3.3%	0.3%	303
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.5	58.1%	35.5%	6.5%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.3	41.8%	47.0%	9.4%	1.8%	741
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.3	43.2%	45.9%	5.4%	5.4%	37
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*	3.3	40.1%	48.1%	9.6%	2.1%	842
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.4	47.4%	48.0%	4.3%	0.3%	350

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.2	41.5%	44.8%	10.1%	3.6%	335
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.3	42.3%	48.5%	8.0%	1.3%	549
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.4	42.8%	51.0%	6.2%	.	292

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.4	44.1%	48.0%	7.9%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.3	41.9%	48.1%	8.3%	1.7%	1,041

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.3	43.1%	47.9%	7.8%	1.2%	1,068
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.2	35.9%	50.0%	10.9%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.0	26.7%	53.3%	11.1%	8.9%	45

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.3	43.1%	48.0%	7.4%	1.6%	1,096
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.1	33.3%	49.0%	15.6%	2.1%	96

E1c: Faculty respect for female students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.3	43.2%	48.0%	7.3%	1.5%	1,042
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.2	36.0%	48.7%	13.3%	2.0%	150

Back to Top

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	39.3%	54.6%	5.5%	0.7%	1,191

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.3	39.8%	54.3%	4.7%	1.3%	558
.....Male
.....Female	3.3	38.9%	54.8%	6.2%	0.2%	633

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	3.2	27.8%	64.6%	6.3%	1.3%	79
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.4	42.9%	53.5%	3.3%	0.3%	303
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.4	41.9%	51.6%	6.5%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.3	39.1%	54.5%	5.7%	0.7%	739
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.1	35.1%	45.9%	16.2%	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency	3.3	37.6%	55.5%	6.1%	0.8%	840
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.4	43.3%	52.4%	4.0%	0.3%	351

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.3	37.6%	53.4%	7.8%	1.2%	335
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.3	39.2%	55.3%	4.9%	0.5%	548
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.4	40.8%	54.8%	4.1%	0.3%	292

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.4	40.9%	54.3%	4.7%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.3	39.0%	54.8%	5.6%	0.7%	1,039

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.3	39.8%	54.2%	5.5%	0.5%	1,066
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.3	40.6%	54.7%	3.1%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.0	19.6%	69.6%	6.5%	4.3%	46

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.3	40.1%	53.8%	5.4%	0.7%	1,095
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.2	30.2%	63.5%	6.3%	.	96

E1d: Graduate student respect for faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.3	40.2%	53.4%	5.7%	0.7%	1,041
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.3	32.7%	62.7%	4.0%	0.7%	150

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	38.1%	53.6%	6.9%	1.4%	1,184

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.3	38.1%	55.2%	5.6%	1.1%	554
.....Male
.....Female	3.3	38.1%	52.2%	8.1%	1.6%	630

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	2.9	20.3%	55.7%	21.5%	2.5%	79
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.3	39.7%	53.0%	6.3%	1.0%	302
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.4	45.2%	48.4%	6.5%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.3	39.2%	54.4%	5.0%	1.4%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.1	34.3%	42.9%	20.0%	2.9%	35
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency	3.3	37.2%	54.3%	7.2%	1.3%	834
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.3	40.3%	52.0%	6.3%	1.4%	350

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.3	37.5%	52.0%	9.0%	1.5%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.3	37.4%	54.3%	6.6%	1.7%	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.3	39.3%	54.8%	5.2%	0.7%	290

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.3	39.4%	53.5%	6.3%	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.3	37.9%	53.8%	7.1%	1.3%	1,032

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.3	38.8%	53.3%	6.8%	1.1%	1,061
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.3	37.1%	53.2%	9.7%	.	62
.....Prefer not to answer	3.0	19.6%	67.4%	4.3%	8.7%	46

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.3	39.0%	53.1%	6.6%	1.3%	1,090
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.1	27.7%	59.6%	10.6%	2.1%	94

E1e: Graduate student respect for minority faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.3	39.0%	52.9%	6.9%	1.2%	1,036
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.2	31.8%	58.8%	6.8%	2.7%	148

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	41.1%	52.4%	5.6%	0.8%	1,186

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.4	42.6%	51.8%	4.9%	0.7%	556
.....Male
.....Female	3.3	39.8%	52.9%	6.3%	1.0%	630

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.2	25.6%	64.1%	10.3%	.	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.4	43.9%	52.5%	3.3%	0.3%	303
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.5	51.6%	45.2%	3.2%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.3	41.4%	51.9%	5.7%	1.0%	736
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.1	36.1%	41.7%	16.7%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency	3.3	40.0%	52.7%	6.3%	1.0%	835
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.4	43.9%	51.6%	4.0%	0.6%	351

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.3	40.8%	52.0%	6.3%	0.9%	331
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.3	40.4%	53.0%	5.5%	1.1%	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.4	42.1%	52.4%	5.1%	0.3%	292

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.4	42.9%	52.4%	4.0%	0.8%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.3	41.0%	52.5%	5.9%	0.7%	1,035

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.3	41.5%	52.5%	5.5%	0.6%	1,063
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.3	41.9%	51.6%	4.8%	1.6%	62
.....Prefer not to answer	3.0	26.1%	58.7%	8.7%	6.5%	46

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.3	42.1%	51.6%	5.5%	0.8%	1,090
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.2	30.2%	61.5%	7.3%	1.0%	96

E1f: Graduate student respect for female faculty	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.3	41.8%	51.6%	5.8%	0.9%	1,037
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.3	36.9%	57.7%	4.7%	0.7%	149

Back to Top

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	2.9	22.6%	52.2%	20.5%	4.7%	1,139

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.0	23.6%	52.3%	20.4%	3.7%	539
.....Male
.....Female	2.9	21.7%	52.0%	20.7%	5.7%	600

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	2.7	12.9%	52.9%	28.6%	5.7%	70
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.0	27.3%	53.0%	16.7%	3.0%	300
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.0	25.8%	51.6%	22.6%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	2.9	21.5%	52.1%	20.8%	5.6%	701
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	2.7	17.1%	45.7%	31.4%	5.7%	35
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*	2.9	20.5%	51.8%	22.4%	5.3%	794
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.0	27.2%	53.0%	16.2%	3.5%	345

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	2.9	21.2%	51.3%	22.2%	5.4%	316
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	2.9	23.3%	52.3%	19.7%	4.8%	524
.....Upper middle/Upper class	2.9	22.6%	51.9%	21.2%	4.2%	283

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	2.9	22.1%	52.5%	21.3%	4.1%	122
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	2.9	22.8%	51.8%	20.7%	4.7%	995

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.0	23.9%	51.4%	20.7%	3.9%	1,019
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	2.7	9.8%	57.4%	21.3%	11.5%	61
.....Prefer not to answer	2.6	8.9%	57.8%	17.8%	15.6%	45

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	2.9	23.3%	51.8%	20.2%	4.7%	1,050
.....No disability
.....Disability	2.8	13.5%	56.2%	24.7%	5.6%	89

E1g: Undergrad respect for minority TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	2.9	23.0%	51.1%	21.0%	4.9%	1,004
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	2.9	19.3%	60.0%	17.0%	3.7%	135

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	27.1%	57.4%	13.7%	1.8%	1,142

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.1	28.4%	57.7%	12.7%	1.1%	542
.....Male
.....Female	3.1	25.8%	57.2%	14.7%	2.3%	600

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	2.9	12.9%	67.1%	17.1%	2.9%	70
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.2	28.7%	59.7%	10.7%	1.0%	300
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.3	40.0%	46.7%	13.3%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	3.1	27.7%	56.4%	14.1%	1.8%	704
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	2.8	16.7%	50.0%	27.8%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*	3.1	25.9%	56.5%	15.5%	2.0%	798
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.2	29.7%	59.6%	9.6%	1.2%	344

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.0	25.2%	55.5%	16.1%	3.2%	317
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.1	28.9%	57.2%	12.5%	1.3%	526
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.1	25.8%	59.0%	14.1%	1.1%	283

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.1	25.8%	59.2%	14.2%	0.8%	120
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.1	27.4%	57.0%	13.9%	1.7%	1,000

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.1	28.0%	57.1%	13.6%	1.3%	1,022
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	2.9	16.4%	62.3%	18.0%	3.3%	61
.....Prefer not to answer	2.8	20.0%	55.6%	13.3%	11.1%	45

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.1	27.6%	57.8%	12.8%	1.8%	1,050
.....No disability
.....Disability	2.9	20.7%	53.3%	25.0%	1.1%	92

E1h: Undergrad respect for female TAs	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.1	27.8%	56.6%	13.7%	1.9%	1,007
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.1	21.5%	63.7%	14.1%	0.7%	135

Back to Top

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.3	36.4%	55.0%	7.3%	1.3%	1,183

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.3	35.9%	56.0%	6.7%	1.4%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.3	36.9%	54.1%	7.8%	1.1%	628

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	2.9	18.2%	58.4%	18.2%	5.2%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.2	32.6%	56.5%	10.0%	1.0%	301
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.2	35.5%	48.4%	16.1%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.3	39.7%	55.0%	4.4%	1.0%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.2	40.5%	43.2%	13.5%	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency	3.3	37.5%	55.1%	6.1%	1.3%	833
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.2	34.0%	54.9%	10.0%	1.1%	350

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.2	34.1%	56.9%	7.2%	1.8%	334
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.3	37.7%	54.0%	7.0%	1.3%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.3	36.7%	54.7%	8.0%	0.7%	289

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.3	40.0%	50.4%	8.8%	0.8%	125
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.3	36.1%	55.6%	7.2%	1.2%	1,033

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.3	37.3%	54.9%	6.8%	1.0%	1,060
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.2	34.9%	54.0%	9.5%	1.6%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	2.9	17.8%	62.2%	13.3%	6.7%	45

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.3	37.2%	54.1%	7.4%	1.4%	1,087
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.2	28.1%	65.6%	6.3%	.	96

E1i: Graduate student respect for grad students of different race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.3	37.0%	54.5%	7.2%	1.3%	1,036
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.2	32.7%	58.5%	7.5%	1.4%	147

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.2	33.4%	55.7%	8.8%	2.0%	1,175

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.2	33.3%	56.2%	7.8%	2.7%	552
.....Male
.....Female	3.2	33.5%	55.4%	9.6%	1.4%	623

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	2.9	14.7%	65.3%	16.0%	4.0%	75
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.2	30.6%	59.5%	8.3%	1.7%	301
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.3	43.3%	46.7%	10.0%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	3.2	36.2%	53.8%	7.9%	2.0%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.1	31.4%	51.4%	14.3%	2.9%	35
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	2

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency	3.2	34.6%	54.6%	8.7%	2.2%	830
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.2	30.7%	58.6%	9.0%	1.7%	345

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.2	33.2%	54.7%	9.4%	2.7%	331
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.2	32.9%	56.3%	8.6%	2.2%	538
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.2	34.5%	55.9%	8.6%	1.0%	290

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.2	33.6%	56.0%	8.8%	1.6%	125
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.2	33.6%	55.7%	8.8%	1.9%	1,027

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.2	34.0%	56.3%	8.4%	1.3%	1,053
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.0	30.2%	47.6%	12.7%	9.5%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	2.9	22.2%	57.8%	11.1%	8.9%	45

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.2	33.9%	55.7%	8.5%	1.9%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.1	28.7%	56.4%	11.7%	3.2%	94

E1j: Graduate student respect for grad students of different sexual orientation	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.2	34.3%	54.8%	9.0%	1.9%	1,030
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.2	27.6%	62.8%	6.9%	2.8%	145

Back to Top

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.2	33.5%	53.0%	11.0%	2.5%	1,182

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender	3.2	32.7%	54.7%	10.3%	2.3%	556
.....Male
.....Female	3.2	34.2%	51.4%	11.7%	2.7%	626

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	2.9	18.2%	62.3%	13.0%	6.5%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.1	29.7%	52.5%	13.5%	4.3%	303
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.3	41.9%	41.9%	16.1%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.2	36.7%	52.5%	9.5%	1.2%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.1	27.0%	56.8%	10.8%	5.4%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	.	.	.	100.0%	1

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*	3.2	35.2%	53.5%	9.9%	1.4%	832
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.1	29.4%	51.7%	13.7%	5.1%	350

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.1	30.1%	55.4%	12.0%	2.4%	332
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.2	34.8%	50.6%	12.0%	2.6%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.2	35.1%	54.3%	8.2%	2.4%	291

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.1	32.5%	48.4%	16.7%	2.4%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.2	33.8%	53.3%	10.6%	2.3%	1,031

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	3.2	34.2%	52.9%	10.6%	2.3%	1,058
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.1	31.7%	50.8%	15.9%	1.6%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	2.9	19.6%	58.7%	13.0%	8.7%	46

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.2	33.9%	52.5%	10.9%	2.8%	1,086
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.2	29.2%	58.3%	12.5%	.	96

E1k: Friendships between grad students of different racial/ethnic groups	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age	3.2	34.1%	52.1%	11.1%	2.6%	1,034
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.1	29.1%	58.8%	10.1%	2.0%	148

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students

	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.1	28.9%	51.3%	15.9%	3.9%	1,163

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Gender*	3.0	26.8%	51.5%	16.2%	5.5%	544
.....Male
.....Female	3.1	30.7%	51.2%	15.7%	2.4%	619

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	2.6	8.3%	55.6%	25.0%	11.1%	72
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	2.9	23.2%	47.8%	23.2%	5.7%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.2	33.3%	50.0%	16.7%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	3.2	33.1%	52.5%	11.7%	2.6%	727
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.0	25.7%	51.4%	22.9%	.	35
.....Other/Unknown	2.5	50.0%	.	.	50.0%	2

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Residency*	3.1	31.7%	52.6%	12.7%	3.0%	821
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	2.9	22.2%	48.2%	23.7%	5.8%	342

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.0	27.4%	50.0%	18.0%	4.6%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.0	28.5%	51.2%	15.6%	4.7%	533
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.1	31.5%	51.7%	15.0%	1.7%	286

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.0	24.2%	50.0%	23.4%	2.4%	124
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.1	29.6%	51.1%	15.4%	3.9%	1,016

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	3.1	29.0%	51.1%	16.5%	3.4%	1,041
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.0	30.2%	49.2%	11.1%	9.5%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.0	24.4%	55.6%	11.1%	8.9%	45

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.1	29.0%	51.5%	15.8%	3.7%	1,070
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.0	28.0%	49.5%	17.2%	5.4%	93

E1l: Friendships between heterosexual and GLBT grad students	Mean Rating	4: Excellent	3: Good	2: Fair	1: Poor	Total (N)
Age*	3.1	30.1%	50.0%	16.1%	3.7%	1,022
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.0	19.9%	61.0%	14.2%	5.0%	141

Back to Top

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	27.4%	52.1%	17.6%	2.2%	0.7%	1,181

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	25.9%	54.4%	17.7%	1.4%	0.5%	555
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	28.8%	50.0%	17.6%	2.9%	0.8%	626

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.4	6.3%	46.8%	30.4%	13.9%	2.5%	79
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	23.3%	56.7%	19.7%	.	0.3%	300
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.3	40.0%	46.7%	13.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	31.1%	51.2%	15.4%	1.9%	0.4%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	21.6%	48.6%	21.6%	2.7%	5.4%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	29.1%	49.3%	17.6%	3.1%	0.8%	833
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.1	23.6%	58.6%	17.5%	.	0.3%	348

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.9	25.4%	52.0%	15.4%	5.7%	1.5%	331
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	28.3%	51.8%	19.3%	0.6%	.	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	28.7%	52.2%	17.6%	1.0%	0.3%	289

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	29.9%	50.4%	18.1%	0.8%	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	27.4%	52.4%	17.4%	2.3%	0.5%	1,027

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.1	28.0%	52.1%	17.6%	1.9%	0.4%	1,054
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.9	28.1%	51.6%	9.4%	7.8%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	14.6%	54.2%	29.2%	.	2.1%	48

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	28.0%	51.8%	17.4%	2.1%	0.6%	1,084
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	20.6%	54.6%	19.6%	3.1%	2.1%	97

E2a: NCSU Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	27.6%	52.1%	17.4%	2.1%	0.7%	1,032
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	26.2%	51.7%	18.8%	2.7%	0.7%	149

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	27.0%	49.6%	21.1%	1.8%	0.5%	1,184

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	25.3%	51.2%	20.1%	2.9%	0.5%	557
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	28.5%	48.2%	22.0%	0.8%	0.5%	627

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	15.4%	50.0%	29.5%	3.8%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	20.8%	53.8%	22.1%	2.6%	0.7%	303
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	29.0%	41.9%	29.0%	.	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	31.1%	48.6%	19.2%	1.0%	0.1%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.6	18.9%	40.5%	27.0%	8.1%	5.4%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency	4.0	29.3%	47.8%	20.9%	1.6%	0.5%	833
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	21.7%	53.8%	21.7%	2.3%	0.6%	351

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.0	26.1%	49.7%	21.5%	2.1%	0.6%	330
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	26.9%	51.2%	20.3%	1.3%	0.4%	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	29.0%	46.6%	22.4%	2.1%	.	290

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	28.3%	46.5%	21.3%	3.1%	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	27.1%	50.1%	20.9%	1.7%	0.3%	1,030

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	27.1%	50.1%	21.0%	1.5%	0.3%	1,057
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	32.8%	43.8%	15.6%	4.7%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	16.7%	47.9%	31.3%	4.2%	.	48

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	26.9%	49.8%	21.1%	1.9%	0.4%	1,087
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.0	28.9%	47.4%	21.6%	.	2.1%	97

E2b: NCSU Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	27.0%	49.5%	21.5%	1.4%	0.6%	1,035
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	27.5%	50.3%	18.1%	4.0%	.	149

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.8	19.2%	49.6%	27.5%	3.0%	0.8%	1,180

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.8	18.4%	50.6%	27.4%	2.7%	0.9%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.8	19.8%	48.6%	27.5%	3.2%	0.8%	625

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.4	6.4%	38.5%	42.3%	11.5%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	18.7%	54.7%	25.3%	1.0%	0.3%	300
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	22.6%	48.4%	25.8%	3.2%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	3.9	20.8%	49.5%	26.5%	2.6%	0.7%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.4	13.5%	35.1%	35.1%	8.1%	8.1%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.8	19.5%	46.8%	28.8%	3.8%	1.1%	832
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	18.4%	56.3%	24.1%	0.9%	0.3%	348

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.7	16.4%	50.3%	26.1%	5.8%	1.5%	330
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.9	20.4%	51.4%	26.4%	1.5%	0.4%	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.8	20.8%	45.5%	31.3%	2.1%	0.3%	288

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.8	20.5%	48.8%	26.0%	3.1%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.8	19.3%	49.8%	27.5%	2.8%	0.6%	1,026

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.9	19.5%	49.9%	27.8%	2.3%	0.6%	1,053
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.8	20.3%	50.0%	18.8%	6.3%	4.7%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.6	12.5%	45.8%	33.3%	8.3%	.	48

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.8	19.9%	49.7%	26.8%	3.0%	0.7%	1,083
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.6	11.3%	48.5%	35.1%	3.1%	2.1%	97

E2c: NCSU Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.8	19.5%	49.5%	27.4%	2.7%	0.9%	1,031
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.8	16.8%	50.3%	27.5%	4.7%	0.7%	149

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.8	19.5%	45.6%	31.5%	2.6%	0.9%	1,174

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.8	18.8%	47.9%	29.7%	2.7%	0.9%	553
.....Male
.....Female	3.8	20.1%	43.5%	33.2%	2.4%	0.8%	621

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.4	7.7%	37.2%	43.6%	10.3%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	24.1%	49.2%	24.7%	1.7%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	23.3%	40.0%	36.7%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	3.8	19.3%	45.8%	32.1%	2.1%	0.7%	729
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.2	5.6%	33.3%	47.2%	5.6%	8.3%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.7	17.9%	43.4%	34.8%	2.9%	1.1%	828
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	23.4%	50.9%	23.7%	1.7%	0.3%	346

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.7	17.3%	44.7%	32.2%	4.6%	1.2%	329
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.9	20.3%	48.1%	29.7%	1.5%	0.6%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.8	21.4%	41.8%	34.4%	2.1%	0.4%	285

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*	3.7	20.5%	37.8%	35.4%	3.9%	2.4%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.8	19.6%	46.6%	31.0%	2.4%	0.5%	1,021

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	3.8	20.0%	45.7%	31.6%	2.1%	0.7%	1,049
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.7	17.5%	46.0%	28.6%	4.8%	3.2%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.6	12.5%	45.8%	33.3%	8.3%	.	48

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.8	20.3%	45.9%	30.4%	2.7%	0.6%	1,078
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.6	10.4%	41.7%	43.8%	1.0%	3.1%	96

E2d: NCSU Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.8	20.0%	45.2%	31.4%	2.4%	1.0%	1,025
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.8	16.1%	48.3%	32.2%	3.4%	.	149

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	37.0%	42.1%	17.8%	2.3%	0.8%	1,179

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	29.3%	45.5%	20.1%	3.2%	1.8%	556
.....Male
.....Female	4.3	43.8%	39.0%	15.7%	1.4%	.	623

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	4.4	55.1%	34.6%	9.0%	1.3%	.	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.2	38.8%	46.5%	14.0%	0.3%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.5	56.7%	36.7%	6.7%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	34.1%	40.9%	20.6%	3.3%	1.1%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.9	24.3%	48.6%	21.6%	2.7%	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.1	36.6%	39.6%	19.4%	3.2%	1.1%	833
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.2	37.9%	48.0%	13.9%	.	0.3%	346

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.2	38.8%	42.1%	16.1%	1.8%	1.2%	330
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	35.3%	41.5%	20.2%	2.2%	0.7%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	37.8%	42.7%	16.3%	2.8%	0.3%	288

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	37.8%	42.5%	17.3%	.	2.4%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.1	36.9%	42.1%	17.9%	2.5%	0.6%	1,025

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	4.1	36.1%	42.3%	18.5%	2.3%	0.8%	1,052
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.4	53.1%	35.9%	6.3%	3.1%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	4.0	27.1%	50.0%	20.8%	.	2.1%	48

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.1	36.7%	42.7%	17.6%	2.2%	0.8%	1,082
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.1	40.2%	35.1%	20.6%	3.1%	1.0%	97

E2e: NCSU Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.1	36.6%	41.7%	18.3%	2.5%	1.0%	1,030
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.2	39.6%	45.0%	14.8%	0.7%	.	149

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	27.7%	51.4%	18.5%	1.9%	0.6%	1,178

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	25.9%	51.2%	19.2%	3.1%	0.7%	557
.....Male
.....Female	4.1	29.3%	51.5%	17.9%	0.8%	0.5%	621

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.9	25.6%	43.6%	28.2%	1.3%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	23.8%	54.1%	19.1%	2.3%	0.7%	303
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	31.0%	44.8%	13.8%	10.3%	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	30.0%	51.6%	17.0%	1.1%	0.3%	729
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.5	13.5%	45.9%	27.0%	8.1%	5.4%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.1	29.7%	49.7%	18.9%	1.2%	0.5%	827
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	22.8%	55.3%	17.7%	3.4%	0.9%	351

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	31.1%	47.0%	19.2%	2.1%	0.6%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	26.7%	51.8%	19.7%	1.7%	0.2%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	26.0%	55.4%	16.3%	1.7%	0.7%	289

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	26.8%	49.6%	19.7%	3.9%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	27.8%	51.7%	18.5%	1.7%	0.4%	1,024

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	4.1	27.8%	51.8%	18.6%	1.6%	0.3%	1,051
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.9	26.6%	50.0%	17.2%	3.1%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.9	22.9%	47.9%	22.9%	4.2%	2.1%	48

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	28.0%	51.4%	18.2%	1.8%	0.6%	1,082
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	24.0%	51.0%	21.9%	2.1%	1.0%	96

E2f: NCSU Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	27.9%	50.6%	19.0%	1.7%	0.7%	1,029
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.1	26.2%	56.4%	14.8%	2.7%	.	149

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	27.2%	53.4%	18.0%	0.8%	0.6%	1,181

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.1	27.7%	52.6%	18.7%	0.4%	0.5%	555
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	26.7%	54.2%	17.3%	1.3%	0.6%	626

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.9	16.7%	56.4%	25.6%	.	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.1	26.5%	54.0%	18.9%	0.3%	0.3%	302
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.3	43.3%	46.7%	10.0%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	28.4%	53.4%	16.5%	1.2%	0.4%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.7	16.2%	48.6%	29.7%	.	5.4%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency	4.0	27.4%	51.9%	19.0%	1.1%	0.6%	831
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.1	26.6%	57.1%	15.4%	0.3%	0.6%	350

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.0	26.0%	51.7%	19.9%	1.5%	0.9%	331
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	27.6%	54.4%	16.9%	0.7%	0.4%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	28.4%	52.9%	18.3%	0.3%	.	289

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	27.6%	47.2%	24.4%	0.8%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.1	27.4%	54.0%	17.3%	0.9%	0.4%	1,027

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.1	27.4%	53.6%	17.8%	0.9%	0.3%	1,054
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	29.7%	48.4%	18.8%	.	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	16.7%	56.3%	22.9%	2.1%	2.1%	48

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.1	27.9%	53.3%	17.4%	0.9%	0.5%	1,084
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	19.6%	54.6%	23.7%	.	2.1%	97

E2g: NCSU Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.1	27.5%	53.1%	17.9%	0.9%	0.6%	1,031
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	24.7%	56.0%	18.0%	0.7%	0.7%	150

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	30.2%	46.8%	20.8%	1.7%	0.5%	1,176

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	3.9	24.5%	47.6%	24.1%	2.7%	1.1%	555
.....Male
.....Female	4.2	35.3%	46.1%	17.9%	0.8%	.	621

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	4.2	37.2%	41.0%	21.8%	.	.	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	23.4%	52.2%	23.4%	0.7%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.3	40.0%	46.7%	13.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	31.8%	45.1%	20.1%	2.5%	0.5%	730
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	4.0	29.7%	48.6%	18.9%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.1	32.9%	44.0%	20.2%	2.3%	0.6%	831
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	23.8%	53.3%	22.3%	0.3%	0.3%	345

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	33.2%	45.4%	19.8%	0.9%	0.6%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	27.1%	48.6%	22.5%	1.5%	0.4%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	33.0%	44.4%	19.4%	2.8%	0.3%	288

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	28.3%	48.8%	20.5%	0.8%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.1	30.6%	46.6%	20.7%	1.8%	0.3%	1,022

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	30.1%	47.0%	20.8%	1.7%	0.4%	1,050
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.2	39.7%	46.0%	11.1%	1.6%	1.6%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	16.7%	43.8%	37.5%	.	2.1%	48

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	29.7%	47.2%	20.9%	1.7%	0.5%	1,079
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.1	35.1%	42.3%	19.6%	2.1%	1.0%	97

E2h: NCSU Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	29.8%	46.6%	21.0%	1.9%	0.6%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.1	32.9%	47.7%	19.5%	.	.	149

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.5	15.0%	36.1%	37.0%	9.5%	2.5%	1,174

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	3.6	16.1%	39.9%	33.6%	8.1%	2.3%	554
.....Male
.....Female	3.5	14.0%	32.7%	40.0%	10.6%	2.6%	620

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.2	6.5%	26.0%	50.6%	11.7%	5.2%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.7	14.6%	46.5%	35.9%	1.7%	1.3%	301
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.8	21.4%	35.7%	42.9%	.	.	28
.....White/Caucasian	3.5	16.2%	33.6%	35.8%	12.1%	2.5%	730
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	2.9	5.6%	25.0%	36.1%	25.0%	8.3%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.4	15.5%	31.4%	37.3%	12.8%	3.0%	828
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.7	13.9%	47.4%	36.1%	1.4%	1.2%	346

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.5	13.4%	35.3%	38.3%	10.3%	2.7%	329
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.6	15.6%	37.6%	35.9%	8.3%	2.6%	540
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.5	15.7%	34.1%	37.6%	11.1%	1.4%	287

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.6	15.0%	37.0%	40.9%	5.5%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.5	15.1%	36.2%	36.1%	10.1%	2.4%	1,021

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.6	15.8%	36.8%	37.2%	8.6%	1.7%	1,047
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	2.8	3.1%	29.7%	25.0%	28.1%	14.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.4	10.4%	31.3%	50.0%	6.3%	2.1%	48

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.5	15.6%	36.7%	36.7%	9.0%	2.0%	1,077
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.2	8.2%	29.9%	40.2%	14.4%	7.2%	97

E2i: NCSU Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.5	15.4%	36.2%	36.6%	9.4%	2.4%	1,025
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.4	12.1%	35.6%	39.6%	10.1%	2.7%	149

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.6	16.2%	41.0%	33.7%	7.3%	1.7%	1,171

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.6	16.0%	42.5%	33.2%	6.5%	1.8%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.6	16.4%	39.6%	34.3%	8.1%	1.6%	616

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.4	6.7%	40.0%	40.0%	9.3%	4.0%	75
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.7	13.7%	47.2%	35.8%	2.7%	0.7%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.8	21.4%	39.3%	39.3%	.	.	28
.....White/Caucasian	3.6	18.5%	39.0%	31.7%	9.2%	1.6%	731
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.2	5.6%	36.1%	38.9%	11.1%	8.3%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.6	17.5%	37.8%	33.1%	9.5%	2.2%	829
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.7	13.2%	48.8%	35.4%	2.0%	0.6%	342

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.5	14.1%	40.1%	34.9%	8.3%	2.8%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.7	16.9%	43.0%	31.5%	7.6%	1.1%	540
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.6	17.5%	37.4%	37.8%	6.3%	1.0%	286

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.6	14.3%	43.7%	35.7%	4.8%	1.6%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.6	16.6%	40.7%	33.5%	7.6%	1.6%	1,021

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.7	17.0%	41.3%	33.7%	6.7%	1.3%	1,044
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.2	4.6%	40.0%	29.2%	20.0%	6.2%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.5	12.8%	34.0%	44.7%	6.4%	2.1%	47

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.7	16.8%	41.5%	33.1%	7.2%	1.4%	1,074
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.4	10.3%	35.1%	40.2%	9.3%	5.2%	97

E2j: NCSU Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.6	16.7%	40.2%	34.0%	7.5%	1.7%	1,025
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.6	13.0%	46.6%	32.2%	6.2%	2.1%	146

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	35.3%	43.3%	19.9%	1.0%	0.5%	1,179

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.1	32.4%	46.6%	19.2%	0.7%	1.1%	556
.....Male
.....Female	4.1	37.9%	40.3%	20.5%	1.3%	.	623

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	4.1	34.6%	43.6%	20.5%	1.3%	.	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	26.5%	52.3%	20.5%	0.3%	0.3%	298
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.2	44.8%	31.0%	24.1%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	38.2%	40.4%	19.5%	1.4%	0.5%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	4.1	40.5%	35.1%	21.6%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.1	38.7%	39.3%	20.1%	1.3%	0.6%	832
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.1	27.1%	52.7%	19.6%	0.3%	0.3%	347

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	36.4%	41.9%	20.5%	0.9%	0.3%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	33.6%	43.8%	20.6%	1.3%	0.7%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.2	37.0%	44.3%	18.3%	0.3%	.	289

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	34.6%	44.1%	20.5%	.	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.1	35.4%	43.3%	19.9%	1.1%	0.3%	1,022

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.1	34.5%	44.3%	19.8%	1.0%	0.4%	1,051
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.4	57.1%	27.0%	14.3%	.	1.6%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	16.7%	45.8%	33.3%	2.1%	2.1%	48

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.1	35.1%	43.8%	19.6%	1.0%	0.5%	1,082
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.1	37.1%	37.1%	23.7%	1.0%	1.0%	97

E2k: NCSU Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*	4.1	36.1%	42.8%	19.8%	1.1%	0.3%	1,029
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	30.0%	46.7%	20.7%	0.7%	2.0%	150

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.8	19.1%	46.1%	31.7%	2.5%	0.7%	1,175

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.8	19.8%	47.3%	29.3%	2.7%	0.9%	556
.....Male
.....Female	3.8	18.4%	45.1%	33.8%	2.3%	0.5%	619

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	14.1%	46.2%	35.9%	2.6%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	19.5%	50.3%	29.5%	0.3%	0.3%	298
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	3.8	19.0%	45.1%	31.8%	3.6%	0.5%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.6	16.7%	41.7%	36.1%	.	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.8	18.9%	44.1%	32.7%	3.4%	0.8%	829
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	19.4%	50.9%	29.2%	0.3%	0.3%	346

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.8	18.0%	46.8%	32.1%	2.4%	0.6%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.8	18.3%	47.6%	30.8%	2.8%	0.6%	542
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.9	22.6%	42.2%	33.4%	1.4%	0.3%	287

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.8	20.5%	46.5%	29.1%	3.1%	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.8	19.3%	46.1%	31.9%	2.3%	0.5%	1,020

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.8	19.6%	46.6%	31.1%	2.3%	0.4%	1,047
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.7	21.9%	35.9%	34.4%	4.7%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.6	6.3%	50.0%	41.7%	.	2.1%	48

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.8	19.4%	46.9%	30.8%	2.3%	0.6%	1,079
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.6	15.6%	37.5%	41.7%	4.2%	1.0%	96

E2l: NCSU Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.8	19.8%	45.3%	31.7%	2.5%	0.7%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.8	14.2%	52.0%	31.1%	2.0%	0.7%	148

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.7	15.8%	44.1%	33.6%	5.1%	1.4%	1,174

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.7	16.5%	44.6%	33.1%	4.9%	0.9%	556
.....Male
.....Female	3.6	15.0%	43.7%	34.1%	5.3%	1.8%	618

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.5	7.8%	41.6%	44.2%	3.9%	2.6%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.8	16.4%	50.2%	30.8%	2.0%	0.7%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.8	20.7%	37.9%	41.4%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	3.7	16.4%	42.7%	33.0%	6.6%	1.4%	731
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.4	8.3%	36.1%	44.4%	5.6%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	.	.	50.0%	.	2

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.6	15.5%	41.7%	34.6%	6.5%	1.7%	827
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.8	16.4%	49.9%	31.4%	1.7%	0.6%	347

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.6	14.1%	44.5%	33.1%	6.1%	2.1%	326
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.7	16.3%	44.5%	33.6%	5.0%	0.6%	541
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.7	17.4%	43.4%	34.0%	4.2%	1.0%	288

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.7	16.5%	44.9%	32.3%	4.7%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.7	15.9%	44.5%	33.5%	5.1%	1.1%	1,019

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.7	16.5%	45.0%	33.2%	4.4%	0.9%	1,046
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.2	10.9%	31.3%	35.9%	14.1%	7.8%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.5	6.3%	45.8%	39.6%	8.3%	.	48

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.7	16.3%	44.7%	32.8%	5.1%	1.0%	1,078
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.4	9.4%	37.5%	42.7%	5.2%	5.2%	96

E2m: NCSU Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.7	16.3%	43.6%	33.6%	5.2%	1.4%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.6	12.2%	47.6%	34.0%	4.8%	1.4%	147

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.7	17.4%	42.9%	34.5%	4.1%	1.1%	1,171

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.7	17.7%	44.9%	32.8%	3.6%	1.1%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.7	17.2%	41.1%	36.0%	4.5%	1.1%	616

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.5	10.5%	35.5%	48.7%	3.9%	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.8	17.1%	50.3%	30.5%	1.0%	1.0%	298
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	27.6%	41.4%	31.0%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	3.7	18.2%	41.1%	34.2%	5.5%	1.0%	730
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.4	8.3%	36.1%	47.2%	2.8%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	3.5	50.0%	.	.	50.0%	.	2

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.7	17.6%	39.4%	36.2%	5.7%	1.1%	825
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.8	17.1%	51.2%	30.3%	0.3%	1.2%	346

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.6	14.8%	43.7%	34.5%	5.5%	1.5%	325
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.8	18.2%	44.4%	33.5%	3.5%	0.4%	538
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.7	19.4%	39.4%	36.7%	3.5%	1.0%	289

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.8	21.3%	41.7%	32.3%	3.1%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.7	17.1%	43.2%	34.8%	4.1%	0.7%	1,016

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.8	17.9%	44.1%	34.0%	3.4%	0.7%	1,044
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.4	17.5%	25.4%	38.1%	15.9%	3.2%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.5	6.3%	45.8%	39.6%	4.2%	4.2%	48

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.7	18.0%	43.6%	33.6%	4.1%	0.7%	1,076
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.4	10.5%	34.7%	45.3%	4.2%	5.3%	95

E2n: NCSU Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.7	17.7%	42.3%	34.5%	4.2%	1.3%	1,026
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.7	15.2%	46.9%	34.5%	3.4%	.	145

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	28.1%	47.9%	20.8%	2.4%	0.9%	1,176

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	28.8%	49.5%	19.3%	1.4%	0.9%	555
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	27.4%	46.4%	22.2%	3.2%	0.8%	621

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.8	16.7%	50.0%	29.5%	2.6%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.1	30.4%	50.2%	18.7%	0.3%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.4	53.3%	30.0%	16.7%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	27.6%	47.5%	20.8%	3.1%	1.0%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.7	20.0%	45.7%	25.7%	5.7%	2.9%	35
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	27.4%	45.8%	22.5%	3.3%	1.1%	828
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.1	29.6%	52.9%	17.0%	0.3%	0.3%	348

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.9	27.8%	43.4%	23.5%	3.4%	1.8%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	26.2%	51.7%	19.9%	2.0%	0.2%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	32.3%	45.5%	19.8%	2.1%	0.3%	288

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	28.3%	44.1%	22.8%	3.9%	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	28.4%	48.5%	20.2%	2.3%	0.7%	1,022

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	4.0	28.7%	48.0%	20.3%	2.4%	0.7%	1,049
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.8	23.4%	46.9%	21.9%	4.7%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.9	20.8%	47.9%	31.3%	.	.	48

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	4.0	29.2%	48.4%	19.8%	2.1%	0.5%	1,079
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.6	15.5%	42.3%	32.0%	5.2%	5.2%	97

E2o: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*	4.0	28.6%	47.9%	20.7%	1.9%	0.9%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	24.2%	47.7%	21.5%	6.0%	0.7%	149

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.8	20.1%	45.8%	29.3%	3.9%	0.8%	1,177

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	3.9	20.5%	48.5%	27.7%	2.2%	1.1%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.8	19.8%	43.4%	30.7%	5.5%	0.6%	622

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.4	9.0%	37.2%	41.0%	11.5%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	20.4%	48.5%	28.1%	2.0%	1.0%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	27.6%	34.5%	37.9%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	3.8	21.3%	45.8%	28.4%	4.0%	0.5%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.6	11.1%	52.8%	25.0%	5.6%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.8	20.6%	43.9%	29.8%	4.9%	0.8%	830
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	19.0%	50.4%	28.2%	1.4%	0.9%	347

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.7	18.5%	43.2%	28.6%	7.9%	1.8%	329
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.8	20.1%	47.2%	29.7%	3.0%	.	542
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.9	22.2%	45.8%	29.9%	1.4%	0.7%	288

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.7	21.3%	39.4%	31.5%	6.3%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.8	20.2%	46.6%	28.9%	3.6%	0.6%	1,023

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.8	20.7%	46.2%	28.8%	3.8%	0.6%	1,050
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.6	18.8%	42.2%	26.6%	9.4%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.6	10.4%	43.8%	43.8%	.	2.1%	48

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.8	20.7%	46.5%	28.8%	3.1%	0.8%	1,080
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.5	13.4%	38.1%	35.1%	12.4%	1.0%	97

E2p: NCSU Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.8	20.5%	45.5%	29.5%	3.5%	1.0%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.8	17.3%	48.0%	28.0%	6.7%	.	150

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.9	20.5%	50.0%	27.8%	1.3%	0.3%	1,178

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.9	19.1%	49.5%	29.7%	0.9%	0.7%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.9	21.8%	50.4%	26.2%	1.6%	.	623

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	3.7	10.3%	55.1%	30.8%	3.8%	.	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	19.5%	49.2%	30.3%	0.3%	0.7%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	23.3%	43.3%	33.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	3.9	22.2%	49.7%	26.5%	1.5%	0.1%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	13.9%	61.1%	22.2%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency	3.9	21.6%	49.5%	26.9%	1.7%	0.2%	832
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	17.9%	51.2%	30.1%	0.3%	0.6%	346

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.9	19.5%	51.4%	26.7%	2.1%	0.3%	329
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.9	20.7%	50.6%	27.2%	1.3%	0.2%	541
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.9	21.7%	47.2%	30.3%	0.3%	0.3%	290

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	23.6%	44.9%	29.9%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.9	20.3%	50.8%	27.3%	1.3%	0.3%	1,024

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	3.9	20.8%	49.7%	27.9%	1.3%	0.3%	1,052
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	25.4%	54.0%	17.5%	1.6%	1.6%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	6.3%	54.2%	39.6%	.	.	48

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.9	20.8%	49.9%	27.8%	1.2%	0.3%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.8	17.5%	51.5%	27.8%	2.1%	1.0%	97

E2q: NCSU Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.9	21.1%	48.7%	28.3%	1.5%	0.4%	1,028
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	16.7%	58.7%	24.7%	.	.	150

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	26.7%	45.6%	26.0%	1.4%	0.3%	1,174

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	3.9	23.4%	45.4%	28.5%	2.2%	0.5%	555
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	29.7%	45.7%	23.7%	0.8%	.	619

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	4.1	31.2%	44.2%	23.4%	1.3%	.	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	21.5%	48.1%	29.6%	0.3%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	30.0%	36.7%	33.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	28.3%	45.1%	24.5%	2.0%	0.1%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.9	25.0%	47.2%	25.0%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	29.5%	43.7%	24.6%	1.9%	0.2%	828
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	20.2%	50.0%	29.2%	0.3%	0.3%	346

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	30.7%	46.6%	21.5%	0.9%	0.3%	326
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	25.7%	45.8%	27.4%	1.1%	.	541
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.9	24.9%	43.6%	28.4%	2.8%	0.3%	289

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	33.1%	40.2%	26.8%	.	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	26.2%	46.4%	25.7%	1.6%	0.2%	1,020

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	26.7%	45.6%	26.0%	1.5%	0.2%	1,047
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.2	40.6%	42.2%	15.6%	.	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	8.3%	52.1%	37.5%	2.1%	.	48

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	26.5%	46.1%	26.0%	1.2%	0.2%	1,077
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	29.9%	39.2%	25.8%	4.1%	1.0%	97

E2r: NCSU Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	27.6%	44.2%	26.5%	1.4%	0.3%	1,026
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	20.9%	54.7%	22.3%	2.0%	.	148

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.7	18.9%	46.2%	26.9%	6.7%	1.3%	1,178

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.8	19.6%	46.1%	27.9%	5.0%	1.3%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.7	18.3%	46.2%	26.0%	8.2%	1.3%	623

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.6	14.1%	47.4%	28.2%	7.7%	2.6%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	19.7%	50.5%	26.8%	2.7%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.8	20.0%	40.0%	36.7%	3.3%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	3.7	19.5%	44.7%	26.7%	7.6%	1.4%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.3	8.3%	44.4%	19.4%	22.2%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.7	18.9%	43.7%	27.2%	8.4%	1.7%	830
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	19.0%	52.0%	26.1%	2.6%	0.3%	348

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.7	17.1%	45.7%	26.5%	8.2%	2.4%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.8	18.4%	46.8%	27.6%	6.4%	0.7%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.8	21.8%	46.0%	26.3%	5.5%	0.3%	289

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.7	19.7%	43.3%	28.3%	6.3%	2.4%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.8	18.8%	46.9%	26.6%	6.7%	1.0%	1,023

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.8	19.1%	47.2%	26.4%	6.4%	1.0%	1,051
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.5	21.9%	31.3%	28.1%	15.6%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.5	6.3%	50.0%	37.5%	2.1%	4.2%	48

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.8	19.3%	46.7%	26.6%	6.2%	1.2%	1,082
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.5	14.6%	40.6%	30.2%	12.5%	2.1%	96

E2s: NCSU Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*	3.8	19.0%	46.3%	27.9%	5.6%	1.2%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.6	18.5%	45.7%	19.9%	13.9%	2.0%	151

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.7	17.7%	41.7%	30.3%	8.5%	1.8%	1,179

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	3.7	18.9%	44.9%	28.5%	5.6%	2.2%	555
.....Male
.....Female	3.6	16.7%	38.9%	31.9%	11.1%	1.4%	624

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.4	10.3%	39.7%	32.1%	15.4%	2.6%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.8	19.4%	50.5%	25.8%	3.3%	1.0%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.7	26.7%	23.3%	43.3%	6.7%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	3.6	17.8%	39.5%	31.5%	9.5%	1.6%	734
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.1	8.3%	36.1%	27.8%	16.7%	11.1%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.6	17.2%	37.9%	32.2%	10.7%	2.0%	832
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.8	19.0%	51.0%	25.6%	3.2%	1.2%	347

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.6	16.7%	38.6%	31.9%	9.7%	3.0%	329
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.7	17.3%	43.5%	30.0%	8.3%	0.9%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.7	20.4%	41.5%	29.4%	7.3%	1.4%	289

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.6	19.7%	38.6%	29.9%	10.2%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.7	17.7%	42.3%	30.0%	8.3%	1.7%	1,026

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.7	18.1%	42.5%	29.4%	8.5%	1.4%	1,053
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.5	20.3%	28.1%	37.5%	7.8%	6.3%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.4	6.4%	42.6%	38.3%	10.6%	2.1%	47

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.7	18.5%	42.2%	30.0%	7.8%	1.5%	1,082
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.3	9.3%	36.1%	33.0%	16.5%	5.2%	97

E2t: NCSU Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*	3.7	17.8%	42.7%	30.7%	7.4%	1.5%	1,030
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.5	17.4%	34.9%	27.5%	16.1%	4.0%	149

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.9	21.5%	46.4%	30.2%	1.5%	0.4%	1,170

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	3.9	22.0%	50.0%	26.0%	1.3%	0.7%	554
.....Male
.....Female	3.8	20.9%	43.2%	33.9%	1.8%	0.2%	616

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.6	13.2%	40.8%	42.1%	2.6%	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	22.5%	50.3%	25.8%	0.7%	0.7%	298
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.8	20.7%	41.4%	37.9%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	3.9	22.2%	46.4%	29.8%	1.5%	0.1%	729
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.5	13.9%	33.3%	41.7%	8.3%	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.8	21.6%	43.9%	32.1%	2.1%	0.4%	825
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	21.2%	52.5%	25.5%	0.3%	0.6%	345

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.8	21.2%	44.2%	31.9%	2.1%	0.6%	326
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.9	21.5%	47.7%	29.7%	0.9%	0.2%	539
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.9	22.3%	46.7%	28.9%	2.1%	.	287

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	24.8%	42.4%	29.6%	3.2%	.	125
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.9	21.1%	47.3%	30.0%	1.3%	0.3%	1,019

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.9	21.6%	47.4%	29.1%	1.6%	0.2%	1,044
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.8	29.7%	31.3%	34.4%	1.6%	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.6	6.4%	48.9%	44.7%	.	.	47

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	3.9	22.0%	47.1%	29.1%	1.5%	0.4%	1,074
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.7	15.6%	38.5%	42.7%	2.1%	1.0%	96

E2u: NCSU Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.9	21.6%	46.5%	30.0%	1.5%	0.5%	1,024
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.8	20.5%	45.9%	31.5%	2.1%	.	146

Back to Top

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	33.3%	44.8%	18.0%	2.9%	1.0%	1,181

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	29.8%	47.3%	20.2%	2.2%	0.5%	554
.....Male
.....Female	4.1	36.4%	42.6%	16.1%	3.5%	1.4%	627

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	24.4%	37.2%	23.1%	12.8%	2.6%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	23.4%	54.5%	20.4%	1.3%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.1	33.3%	43.3%	23.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	38.2%	42.4%	16.1%	2.4%	0.8%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	32.4%	32.4%	21.6%	5.4%	8.1%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.1	37.8%	40.6%	17.1%	3.2%	1.3%	836
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	22.3%	55.1%	20.3%	2.0%	0.3%	345

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	4.0	33.6%	42.4%	16.4%	5.5%	2.1%	330
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	33.3%	45.5%	18.6%	2.2%	0.4%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	33.4%	45.2%	19.7%	1.4%	0.3%	290

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	32.3%	44.9%	21.3%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.1	33.5%	44.6%	17.8%	3.1%	1.0%	1,029

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.1	33.6%	45.1%	17.9%	2.8%	0.6%	1,055
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	41.5%	33.8%	15.4%	3.1%	6.2%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	17.4%	50.0%	26.1%	4.3%	2.2%	46

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.1	33.6%	44.5%	18.0%	3.0%	0.8%	1,083
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.0	29.6%	48.0%	18.4%	1.0%	3.1%	98

E3a: Grad Prog Supportiveness: African American students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.1	33.3%	44.4%	18.5%	2.8%	1.0%	1,031
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.1	33.3%	47.3%	14.7%	3.3%	1.3%	150

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	35.4%	46.0%	16.8%	1.3%	0.6%	1,179

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.1	32.5%	48.2%	17.5%	1.1%	0.7%	554
.....Male
.....Female	4.2	37.9%	44.0%	16.2%	1.4%	0.5%	625

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	4.0	30.3%	40.8%	27.6%	.	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	23.6%	53.8%	19.3%	2.7%	0.7%	301
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.1	43.3%	26.7%	30.0%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.2	40.1%	44.7%	14.2%	0.8%	0.1%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.9	40.5%	32.4%	16.2%	2.7%	8.1%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.2	40.1%	43.0%	15.6%	0.7%	0.6%	833
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	24.0%	53.2%	19.7%	2.6%	0.6%	346

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	34.9%	45.0%	17.4%	1.5%	1.2%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.2	35.3%	47.4%	16.2%	1.1%	.	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.2	36.6%	44.1%	17.9%	1.0%	0.3%	290

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	33.1%	44.1%	20.5%	2.4%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.2	35.7%	46.2%	16.4%	1.2%	0.5%	1,028

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.2	35.8%	45.7%	17.1%	1.1%	0.3%	1,055
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.1	35.4%	46.2%	12.3%	1.5%	4.6%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	4.0	22.7%	54.5%	18.2%	4.5%	.	44

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.1	35.1%	46.3%	16.7%	1.3%	0.6%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.2	38.8%	41.8%	17.3%	1.0%	1.0%	98

E3b: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Asian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.1	35.8%	45.4%	16.9%	1.3%	0.7%	1,031
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.1	32.4%	50.0%	16.2%	1.4%	.	148

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	29.3%	44.8%	23.4%	1.8%	0.7%	1,177

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	26.3%	46.5%	25.0%	1.6%	0.5%	551
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	31.9%	43.3%	22.0%	1.9%	0.8%	626

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	22.1%	36.4%	35.1%	3.9%	2.6%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	21.8%	53.0%	23.5%	1.3%	0.3%	298
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	32.3%	41.9%	22.6%	3.2%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	32.8%	43.3%	22.1%	1.5%	0.3%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.7	32.4%	27.0%	27.0%	5.4%	8.1%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	32.9%	41.3%	23.0%	1.9%	0.8%	833
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	20.6%	53.2%	24.4%	1.5%	0.3%	344

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.9	28.3%	42.2%	24.3%	3.4%	1.8%	325
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	29.9%	46.4%	22.4%	1.3%	.	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	30.4%	43.9%	24.9%	0.7%	.	289

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	28.3%	40.2%	29.1%	2.4%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	29.5%	45.5%	22.8%	1.7%	0.6%	1,025

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	30.1%	44.9%	23.2%	1.5%	0.3%	1,053
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.8	29.2%	38.5%	23.1%	3.1%	6.2%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	11.4%	52.3%	31.8%	4.5%	.	44

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	29.6%	45.0%	22.8%	1.9%	0.6%	1,079
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	26.5%	41.8%	30.6%	.	1.0%	98

E3c: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Hispanic/Latino students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	29.7%	44.4%	23.2%	1.9%	0.8%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	26.7%	47.3%	25.3%	0.7%	.	150

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	28.8%	42.1%	26.5%	1.8%	0.8%	1,170

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.9	26.2%	45.3%	26.0%	1.6%	0.9%	550
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	31.1%	39.4%	26.9%	1.9%	0.6%	620

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.8	23.7%	34.2%	36.8%	3.9%	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	24.2%	51.2%	22.6%	1.3%	0.7%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.8	30.0%	26.7%	40.0%	3.3%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	31.1%	40.6%	26.2%	1.6%	0.4%	729
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.6	27.8%	27.8%	33.3%	2.8%	8.3%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	31.3%	37.9%	27.9%	2.1%	0.8%	828
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	22.8%	52.3%	23.1%	1.2%	0.6%	342

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.9	29.1%	38.3%	27.9%	3.1%	1.5%	326
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	29.2%	44.1%	25.0%	1.5%	0.2%	537
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	29.1%	41.5%	28.4%	0.7%	0.3%	289

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	28.6%	35.7%	32.5%	3.2%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	29.1%	42.6%	26.0%	1.6%	0.7%	1,020

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	29.7%	42.2%	26.0%	1.6%	0.5%	1,047
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.8	28.1%	34.4%	31.3%	1.6%	4.7%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	13.3%	48.9%	33.3%	4.4%	.	45

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	29.1%	42.0%	26.2%	2.0%	0.7%	1,073
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	25.8%	43.3%	29.9%	.	1.0%	97

E3d: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Native American/Alaska Native students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	29.2%	42.0%	26.0%	2.0%	0.9%	1,021
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	26.2%	43.0%	30.2%	0.7%	.	149

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.2	38.3%	44.4%	15.7%	1.3%	0.4%	1,179

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.1	30.9%	47.5%	19.3%	1.4%	0.9%	554
.....Male
.....Female	4.3	44.8%	41.6%	12.5%	1.1%	.	625

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	4.4	53.2%	36.4%	10.4%	.	.	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.1	30.1%	52.8%	16.1%	0.7%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.3	46.7%	33.3%	20.0%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.2	39.4%	42.6%	15.8%	1.8%	0.4%	734
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	4.2	43.2%	35.1%	18.9%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.2	41.7%	40.9%	15.2%	1.7%	0.5%	834
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.1	29.9%	52.8%	16.8%	0.3%	0.3%	345

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.2	42.4%	42.4%	13.1%	1.5%	0.6%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.2	36.5%	44.9%	17.1%	1.1%	0.4%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.2	37.2%	45.2%	16.6%	1.0%	.	290

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.2	39.4%	44.1%	15.0%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.2	38.0%	44.6%	15.9%	1.2%	0.4%	1,027

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.2	37.9%	44.9%	15.6%	1.3%	0.3%	1,053
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.4	52.3%	33.8%	12.3%	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.9	21.7%	50.0%	26.1%	.	2.2%	46

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.2	38.2%	44.5%	15.5%	1.4%	0.4%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.2	38.8%	42.9%	17.3%	.	1.0%	98

E3e: Grad Prog Supportiveness: White students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.2	38.2%	43.9%	16.1%	1.4%	0.5%	1,030
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.2	38.9%	47.7%	12.8%	0.7%	.	149

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	36.3%	45.0%	16.3%	1.7%	0.7%	1,179

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.1	34.0%	47.7%	16.1%	1.4%	0.7%	553
.....Male
.....Female	4.2	38.3%	42.7%	16.5%	1.9%	0.6%	626

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	4.1	37.7%	37.7%	20.8%	2.6%	1.3%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	25.7%	53.0%	19.0%	1.7%	0.7%	300
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	40.0%	23.3%	33.3%	3.3%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.2	40.5%	43.8%	14.1%	1.4%	0.3%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	32.4%	37.8%	16.2%	5.4%	8.1%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.2	41.1%	41.8%	15.1%	1.4%	0.6%	833
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	24.9%	52.9%	19.1%	2.3%	0.9%	346

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	36.1%	44.0%	15.6%	3.1%	1.2%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.2	36.6%	45.2%	16.9%	1.1%	0.2%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.2	37.2%	45.2%	15.5%	1.4%	0.7%	290

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	34.6%	44.9%	16.5%	3.9%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.2	36.8%	45.0%	16.2%	1.4%	0.7%	1,027

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.2	36.7%	45.5%	15.8%	1.4%	0.5%	1,054
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	38.5%	38.5%	15.4%	3.1%	4.6%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.9	24.4%	44.4%	24.4%	6.7%	.	45

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.1	36.1%	45.2%	16.2%	1.9%	0.6%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.2	38.8%	42.9%	17.3%	.	1.0%	98

E3f: Grad Prog Supportiveness: International students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.1	36.5%	44.4%	16.7%	1.6%	0.8%	1,029
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.2	34.7%	49.3%	13.3%	2.7%	.	150

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	35.0%	46.6%	16.7%	1.4%	0.4%	1,181

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.1	31.9%	48.4%	18.4%	0.5%	0.7%	554
.....Male
.....Female	4.2	37.6%	45.0%	15.2%	2.1%	0.2%	627

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	4.2	33.3%	48.7%	17.9%	.	.	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.1	26.4%	53.5%	19.4%	0.3%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.2	40.0%	40.0%	20.0%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.2	38.6%	44.2%	15.2%	1.6%	0.3%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	29.7%	37.8%	18.9%	8.1%	5.4%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.2	38.9%	43.8%	15.3%	1.6%	0.5%	836
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	25.5%	53.3%	20.0%	0.9%	0.3%	345

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	35.2%	45.8%	15.8%	2.1%	1.2%	330
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	33.5%	47.8%	17.5%	1.3%	.	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.2	37.7%	45.0%	16.6%	0.7%	.	289

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	34.6%	44.1%	19.7%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.1	35.0%	47.0%	16.4%	1.3%	0.4%	1,027

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.2	34.9%	46.9%	16.9%	1.0%	0.2%	1,053
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.1	40.9%	39.4%	12.1%	3.0%	4.5%	66
.....Prefer not to answer	3.9	23.4%	53.2%	17.0%	6.4%	.	47

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.2	35.4%	46.4%	16.6%	1.3%	0.4%	1,083
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.1	30.6%	49.0%	17.3%	2.0%	1.0%	98

E3g: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Female students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.1	35.2%	46.0%	17.1%	1.3%	0.5%	1,029
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.2	33.6%	50.7%	13.8%	2.0%	.	152

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.1	35.9%	44.6%	18.4%	0.8%	0.3%	1,177

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	28.7%	47.5%	22.0%	1.3%	0.5%	550
.....Male
.....Female	4.3	42.1%	42.1%	15.3%	0.5%	.	627

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	4.2	40.8%	40.8%	18.4%	.	.	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	24.5%	54.0%	20.5%	0.7%	0.3%	298
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.2	40.0%	36.7%	23.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.2	39.6%	41.7%	17.4%	1.1%	0.1%	734
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	4.1	37.8%	40.5%	18.9%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.2	40.8%	41.0%	16.9%	1.1%	0.2%	834
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	23.9%	53.4%	22.2%	0.3%	0.3%	343

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.2	37.2%	45.7%	15.9%	0.9%	0.3%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	36.0%	43.4%	19.8%	0.7%	.	541
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	35.2%	44.8%	19.0%	0.7%	0.3%	290

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.1	33.3%	44.4%	20.6%	1.6%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.2	36.3%	44.6%	18.2%	0.7%	0.2%	1,026

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.2	36.0%	44.8%	18.2%	0.9%	0.2%	1,050
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.3	48.5%	37.9%	12.1%	.	1.5%	66
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	15.2%	52.2%	32.6%	.	.	46

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.2	36.0%	44.5%	18.4%	0.9%	0.2%	1,079
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.1	34.7%	45.9%	18.4%	.	1.0%	98

E3h: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Male students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.1	35.7%	44.6%	18.6%	0.9%	0.3%	1,028
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.2	36.9%	45.0%	17.4%	0.7%	.	149

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.8	24.1%	39.7%	32.2%	2.8%	1.1%	1,166

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.8	22.1%	42.6%	31.4%	2.9%	0.9%	547
.....Male
.....Female	3.8	25.8%	37.2%	33.0%	2.7%	1.3%	619

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.6	13.2%	40.8%	39.5%	3.9%	2.6%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.8	18.6%	48.6%	30.7%	1.4%	0.7%	296
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.8	25.0%	28.6%	46.4%	.	.	28
.....White/Caucasian	3.9	27.3%	37.5%	30.8%	3.4%	1.0%	728
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.6	25.0%	19.4%	47.2%	2.8%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.8	27.1%	36.2%	32.0%	3.4%	1.3%	827
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.8	16.8%	48.4%	32.7%	1.5%	0.6%	339

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.7	22.3%	37.0%	35.5%	3.7%	1.5%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.9	24.9%	40.6%	30.7%	3.0%	0.9%	535
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.9	25.5%	39.9%	32.5%	1.7%	0.3%	286

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.8	24.2%	39.1%	34.4%	1.6%	0.8%	128
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.8	24.2%	39.7%	32.1%	3.1%	1.0%	1,014

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.9	25.0%	40.2%	31.8%	2.4%	0.6%	1,042
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.4	20.0%	26.2%	33.8%	10.8%	9.2%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.6	8.9%	44.4%	44.4%	2.2%	.	45

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.8	24.4%	39.8%	32.3%	2.5%	1.0%	1,069
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.7	20.6%	39.2%	32.0%	6.2%	2.1%	97

E3i: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Transgender students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.8	24.6%	39.5%	31.8%	3.0%	1.1%	1,020
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.8	20.5%	41.1%	35.6%	1.4%	1.4%	146

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.9	26.8%	42.1%	28.0%	2.2%	0.9%	1,170

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.9	23.6%	44.0%	28.9%	2.4%	1.1%	550
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	29.5%	40.3%	27.3%	2.1%	0.8%	620

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	17.3%	41.3%	34.7%	4.0%	2.7%	75
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.8	18.2%	50.7%	28.7%	1.4%	1.0%	296
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	27.6%	31.0%	41.4%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	31.0%	40.0%	26.0%	2.5%	0.5%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.7	27.8%	25.0%	38.9%	2.8%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	30.7%	39.0%	27.0%	2.5%	0.8%	831
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.8	17.1%	49.6%	30.7%	1.5%	1.2%	339

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.8	24.8%	39.4%	30.9%	4.0%	0.9%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	3.9	27.5%	43.3%	26.6%	1.7%	0.9%	538
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	28.6%	41.5%	28.2%	1.4%	0.3%	287

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	28.1%	40.6%	28.9%	1.6%	0.8%	128
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.9	26.8%	42.1%	28.0%	2.4%	0.7%	1,018

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	3.9	27.6%	42.2%	27.6%	2.1%	0.6%	1,045
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.7	27.7%	30.8%	30.8%	6.2%	4.6%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	8.7%	52.2%	37.0%	.	2.2%	46

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.9	27.0%	42.1%	28.2%	1.9%	0.9%	1,072
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.8	24.5%	41.8%	26.5%	6.1%	1.0%	98

E3j: Grad Prog Supportiveness: GLB students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.9	27.0%	41.8%	28.0%	2.2%	1.0%	1,023
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	25.2%	43.5%	28.6%	2.0%	0.7%	147

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	30.3%	42.5%	25.6%	1.3%	0.3%	1,179

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	28.0%	45.7%	25.1%	0.5%	0.7%	554
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	32.3%	39.7%	26.1%	1.9%	.	625

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.9	26.0%	41.6%	32.5%	.	.	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	26.1%	51.5%	21.7%	0.3%	0.3%	299
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	32.1%	40.1%	25.6%	1.9%	0.3%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.9	35.1%	24.3%	37.8%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	32.4%	38.5%	27.1%	1.7%	0.4%	834
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	25.2%	52.2%	22.0%	0.3%	0.3%	345

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.0	28.4%	42.4%	27.1%	1.8%	0.3%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	30.5%	42.8%	25.0%	1.3%	0.4%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	32.9%	40.8%	25.6%	0.7%	.	289

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	31.7%	42.9%	23.8%	0.8%	0.8%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	30.2%	42.3%	25.9%	1.4%	0.2%	1,026

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	30.7%	42.8%	25.0%	1.2%	0.3%	1,053
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	35.9%	31.3%	28.1%	3.1%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	12.8%	48.9%	38.3%	.	.	47

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	30.2%	42.8%	25.4%	1.3%	0.3%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.0	31.6%	38.8%	27.6%	1.0%	1.0%	98

E3k: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	30.8%	41.6%	25.9%	1.4%	0.3%	1,028
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	26.5%	48.3%	23.8%	0.7%	0.7%	151

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.9	26.9%	42.4%	29.5%	0.9%	0.3%	1,171

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.9	25.4%	44.6%	28.6%	1.1%	0.4%	552
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	28.3%	40.5%	30.2%	0.8%	0.2%	619

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	18.2%	39.0%	40.3%	1.3%	1.3%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	22.3%	52.7%	24.3%	0.3%	0.3%	296
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	31.0%	31.0%	37.9%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	29.3%	39.8%	29.7%	1.2%	.	731
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	30.6%	27.8%	38.9%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	29.3%	38.6%	30.7%	1.2%	0.2%	830
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	21.1%	51.9%	26.4%	0.3%	0.3%	341

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.9	25.9%	42.0%	30.2%	1.5%	0.3%	324
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	27.5%	43.1%	28.8%	0.6%	.	541
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	28.1%	40.6%	30.2%	1.0%	.	288

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	27.8%	43.7%	27.8%	0.8%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	27.0%	42.3%	29.7%	1.0%	0.1%	1,020

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	27.7%	42.4%	28.9%	0.9%	0.1%	1,047
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.9	28.1%	35.9%	31.3%	3.1%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	10.9%	50.0%	39.1%	.	.	46

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	27.1%	42.9%	28.9%	0.9%	0.2%	1,073
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.8	24.5%	37.8%	35.7%	1.0%	1.0%	98

E3l: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Jewish students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	27.4%	41.9%	29.5%	1.0%	0.3%	1,022
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	23.5%	46.3%	29.5%	0.7%	.	149

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.9	26.2%	42.1%	30.2%	1.2%	0.3%	1,170

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.9	25.0%	43.7%	29.2%	1.5%	0.5%	551
.....Male
.....Female	3.9	27.1%	40.7%	31.0%	1.0%	0.2%	619

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.6	14.5%	38.2%	44.7%	1.3%	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	20.9%	52.5%	24.6%	1.3%	0.7%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	31.0%	31.0%	37.9%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	29.2%	39.7%	29.9%	1.2%	.	730
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	27.8%	25.0%	44.4%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	3.9	28.6%	38.4%	31.5%	1.2%	0.2%	828
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	20.2%	51.2%	26.9%	1.2%	0.6%	342

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.9	22.9%	42.1%	32.5%	2.2%	0.3%	323
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	27.7%	43.2%	28.6%	0.6%	.	542
.....Upper middle/Upper class	3.9	28.2%	39.0%	31.0%	1.4%	0.3%	287

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	24.6%	42.1%	31.7%	1.6%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.9	26.6%	42.0%	30.0%	1.2%	0.2%	1,019

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	4.0	27.2%	42.3%	29.3%	1.1%	0.2%	1,046
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.7	21.9%	35.9%	37.5%	3.1%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	13.0%	45.7%	41.3%	.	.	46

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	3.9	26.4%	42.6%	29.4%	1.3%	0.3%	1,072
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.8	23.5%	36.7%	38.8%	.	1.0%	98

E3m: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Muslim students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	3.9	26.5%	41.9%	30.1%	1.1%	0.4%	1,022
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	23.6%	43.9%	30.4%	2.0%	.	148

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.9	27.1%	42.0%	29.8%	0.9%	0.3%	1,168

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	3.9	25.5%	43.6%	29.6%	0.9%	0.4%	550
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	28.5%	40.5%	29.9%	1.0%	0.2%	618

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	19.7%	36.8%	40.8%	1.3%	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	22.3%	51.4%	25.7%	0.3%	0.3%	296
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	32.1%	28.6%	39.3%	.	.	28
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	29.5%	40.1%	29.3%	1.1%	.	730
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.7	27.8%	25.0%	41.7%	2.8%	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	29.5%	38.4%	30.7%	1.2%	0.2%	828
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	21.2%	50.6%	27.6%	0.3%	0.3%	340

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.9	25.1%	40.6%	31.9%	2.2%	0.3%	323
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	27.6%	43.9%	28.1%	0.4%	.	540
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	29.3%	38.7%	31.4%	0.7%	.	287

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	27.0%	41.3%	31.7%	.	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	3.9	27.1%	41.9%	29.8%	1.1%	0.1%	1,017

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	28.0%	42.2%	28.7%	1.0%	0.1%	1,044
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.8	25.0%	34.4%	37.5%	1.6%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	3.7	10.9%	43.5%	45.7%	.	.	46

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	27.5%	42.4%	29.1%	0.8%	0.2%	1,071
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.8	22.7%	37.1%	37.1%	2.1%	1.0%	97

E3n: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Other Non-Christian students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	27.6%	41.7%	29.6%	0.8%	0.3%	1,021
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	23.1%	43.5%	31.3%	2.0%	.	147

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	30.5%	44.0%	23.4%	1.5%	0.7%	1,169

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	28.9%	46.1%	23.6%	0.9%	0.5%	547
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	32.0%	42.1%	23.2%	1.9%	0.8%	622

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	18.4%	36.8%	40.8%	2.6%	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	27.6%	48.3%	23.5%	.	0.7%	294
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.1	40.0%	30.0%	26.7%	3.3%	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	32.4%	44.3%	20.8%	1.9%	0.5%	731
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.9	33.3%	27.8%	36.1%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	32.3%	41.5%	23.5%	1.9%	0.7%	829
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	26.2%	50.0%	22.9%	0.3%	0.6%	340

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	4.0	30.3%	40.2%	25.1%	2.8%	1.5%	323
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.1	31.4%	44.7%	22.6%	1.3%	.	541
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	30.3%	45.6%	23.3%	0.3%	0.3%	287

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	29.4%	42.9%	27.0%	.	0.8%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	30.9%	43.9%	23.0%	1.7%	0.5%	1,018

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	4.0	30.9%	44.6%	22.5%	1.3%	0.6%	1,044
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.9	30.8%	32.3%	30.8%	4.6%	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.9	23.9%	43.5%	32.6%	.	.	46

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	4.0	30.7%	44.5%	23.2%	1.4%	0.2%	1,072
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.8	28.9%	38.1%	24.7%	2.1%	6.2%	97

E3o: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with disabilities	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	30.3%	44.1%	23.6%	1.4%	0.6%	1,022
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	32.0%	42.9%	21.8%	2.0%	1.4%	147

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	3.9	28.6%	41.7%	26.1%	2.6%	0.9%	1,173

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	26.9%	45.5%	25.5%	1.1%	1.1%	550
.....Male
.....Female	3.9	30.2%	38.4%	26.6%	4.0%	0.8%	623

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.6	17.1%	35.5%	35.5%	10.5%	1.3%	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	22.6%	49.8%	26.3%	0.3%	1.0%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	3.9	31.0%	31.0%	37.9%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	32.2%	40.0%	24.3%	2.9%	0.7%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	27.8%	33.3%	30.6%	2.8%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	31.6%	38.3%	25.6%	3.5%	1.0%	831
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	21.3%	50.0%	27.2%	0.6%	0.9%	342

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	3.8	27.7%	40.0%	22.5%	8.0%	1.8%	325
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	29.5%	42.7%	26.7%	0.9%	0.2%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	29.3%	40.4%	29.6%	.	0.7%	287

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	30.2%	36.5%	28.6%	4.0%	0.8%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	28.7%	42.1%	25.9%	2.5%	0.8%	1,022

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	29.0%	42.1%	25.8%	2.5%	0.6%	1,047
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.8	32.3%	27.7%	27.7%	7.7%	4.6%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	17.0%	48.9%	31.9%	.	2.1%	47

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	4.0	28.8%	42.4%	25.8%	2.0%	0.9%	1,075
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.8	26.5%	33.7%	29.6%	9.2%	1.0%	98

E3p: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Poor/working class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	28.7%	41.9%	26.3%	2.1%	1.0%	1,024
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	28.2%	40.3%	24.8%	6.0%	0.7%	149

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	29.5%	43.3%	26.3%	0.7%	0.3%	1,174

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	26.9%	45.0%	26.9%	0.7%	0.5%	551
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	31.8%	41.7%	25.8%	0.6%	.	623

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.8	19.7%	39.5%	40.8%	.	.	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	3.9	22.6%	50.8%	25.9%	0.3%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	33.1%	41.6%	24.3%	1.0%	0.1%	734
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.9	30.6%	33.3%	33.3%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	32.8%	40.1%	26.0%	0.8%	0.2%	832
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	21.3%	50.9%	27.2%	0.3%	0.3%	342

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.0	28.6%	44.3%	25.2%	1.5%	0.3%	325
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	29.8%	43.6%	26.1%	0.4%	0.2%	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	30.3%	40.8%	28.6%	0.3%	.	287

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	30.4%	41.6%	27.2%	0.8%	.	125
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	29.3%	43.5%	26.4%	0.7%	0.2%	1,024

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	4.0	29.8%	43.6%	25.7%	0.8%	0.2%	1,048
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	33.8%	32.3%	32.3%	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	14.9%	51.1%	34.0%	.	.	47

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	29.5%	43.5%	26.2%	0.7%	0.2%	1,076
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.0	29.6%	40.8%	27.6%	1.0%	1.0%	98

E3q: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Middle class students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	29.8%	42.5%	26.6%	0.8%	0.3%	1,026
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.0	27.0%	48.6%	24.3%	.	.	148

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	31.4%	42.1%	25.6%	0.6%	0.3%	1,171

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	27.9%	44.0%	26.8%	0.7%	0.5%	548
.....Male
.....Female	4.1	34.5%	40.4%	24.6%	0.5%	.	623

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.9	26.3%	36.8%	35.5%	1.3%	.	76
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	23.3%	50.0%	26.0%	0.3%	0.3%	296
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	35.0%	40.6%	23.6%	0.7%	0.1%	732
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.9	36.1%	27.8%	33.3%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.1	35.3%	38.7%	25.1%	0.7%	0.2%	830
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	22.0%	50.4%	27.0%	0.3%	0.3%	341

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.1	33.3%	42.9%	22.5%	0.9%	0.3%	324
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	30.1%	42.8%	26.5%	0.6%	.	544
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	32.3%	38.9%	28.1%	0.4%	0.4%	285

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	33.3%	38.9%	27.0%	0.8%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	31.2%	42.5%	25.6%	0.6%	0.2%	1,020

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	31.6%	42.7%	24.9%	0.7%	0.2%	1,045
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	4.0	40.0%	27.7%	30.8%	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	14.9%	48.9%	36.2%	.	.	47

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	31.0%	42.9%	25.3%	0.6%	0.2%	1,073
.....No disability
.....Disability	4.0	35.7%	33.7%	28.6%	1.0%	1.0%	98

E3r: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Upper class/wealthy students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	31.6%	41.6%	25.9%	0.6%	0.3%	1,023
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	4.1	30.4%	45.3%	23.6%	0.7%	.	148

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	30.6%	43.5%	22.3%	3.1%	0.4%	1,178

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	27.7%	45.3%	24.6%	1.8%	0.5%	552
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	33.1%	42.0%	20.3%	4.3%	0.3%	626

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	19.5%	41.6%	33.8%	3.9%	1.3%	77
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	24.2%	50.8%	23.9%	0.7%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	33.3%	33.3%	33.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.1	34.1%	42.3%	19.6%	3.9%	0.1%	736
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.6	30.6%	22.2%	33.3%	8.3%	5.6%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.5	50.0%	50.0%	.	.	.	2

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	33.7%	40.4%	21.3%	4.2%	0.5%	835
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	23.0%	51.3%	24.8%	0.6%	0.3%	343

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	4.0	29.4%	43.7%	20.5%	5.5%	0.9%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	30.5%	44.2%	22.9%	2.4%	.	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.1	33.3%	41.3%	23.3%	2.1%	.	288

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	29.4%	44.4%	23.8%	2.4%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	30.8%	43.6%	22.0%	3.3%	0.3%	1,026

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	31.1%	43.9%	21.7%	3.1%	0.2%	1,052
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.9	30.8%	35.4%	26.2%	4.6%	3.1%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.9	21.3%	46.8%	29.8%	2.1%	.	47

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status*	4.0	30.7%	43.7%	22.5%	2.7%	0.4%	1,080
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	28.6%	41.8%	20.4%	8.2%	1.0%	98

E3s: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Nontraditional students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*	4.0	31.0%	43.5%	23.0%	2.0%	0.5%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	27.8%	43.7%	17.9%	10.6%	.	151

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	29.3%	42.5%	23.4%	3.7%	1.1%	1,177

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender	4.0	27.6%	44.5%	24.5%	2.7%	0.7%	551
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	30.8%	40.7%	22.5%	4.5%	1.4%	626

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.6	17.9%	38.5%	33.3%	9.0%	1.3%	78
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	24.2%	51.5%	22.9%	1.0%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	33.3%	30.0%	36.7%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	32.6%	40.5%	21.5%	4.4%	1.1%	734
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.6	25.0%	30.6%	33.3%	2.8%	8.3%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	32.0%	38.8%	23.1%	4.6%	1.4%	834
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	3.9	22.7%	51.3%	24.2%	1.5%	0.3%	343

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	3.9	29.0%	40.2%	23.8%	4.9%	2.1%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	29.3%	43.1%	23.8%	3.5%	0.4%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	30.9%	43.1%	22.6%	2.8%	0.7%	288

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	4.0	31.0%	39.7%	24.6%	4.8%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	29.2%	43.0%	23.2%	3.5%	1.1%	1,026

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	4.0	29.5%	42.8%	23.1%	3.8%	0.8%	1,051
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.9	32.3%	40.0%	21.5%	1.5%	4.6%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	23.4%	38.3%	31.9%	4.3%	2.1%	47

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	29.3%	42.7%	23.6%	3.3%	1.0%	1,079
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	29.6%	39.8%	21.4%	7.1%	2.0%	98

E3t: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Students with children	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age*	4.0	29.7%	43.3%	23.2%	2.8%	1.0%	1,028
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.8	26.8%	36.9%	24.8%	9.4%	2.0%	149

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students

	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Total (N)	4.0	29.1%	41.8%	28.2%	0.4%	0.4%	1,165

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Gender*	4.0	26.3%	46.0%	26.3%	0.7%	0.7%	548
.....Male
.....Female	4.0	31.6%	38.1%	30.0%	0.2%	0.2%	617

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	3.7	21.3%	34.7%	41.3%	.	2.7%	75
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	4.0	24.3%	50.3%	24.7%	0.3%	0.3%	296
.....Hispanic/Latino	4.0	31.0%	34.5%	34.5%	.	.	29
.....White/Caucasian	4.0	31.8%	40.0%	27.5%	0.6%	0.1%	727
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	3.8	27.8%	30.6%	38.9%	.	2.8%	36
.....Other/Unknown	4.0	50.0%	.	50.0%	.	.	2

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Residency*	4.0	31.8%	37.9%	29.4%	0.5%	0.5%	824
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	4.0	22.6%	51.3%	25.5%	0.3%	0.3%	341

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	4.0	29.7%	39.0%	29.7%	0.6%	0.9%	323
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	4.0	29.1%	44.0%	26.7%	0.2%	.	539
.....Upper middle/Upper class	4.0	29.8%	39.6%	29.8%	0.7%	.	285

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	3.9	28.0%	39.2%	32.0%	0.8%	.	125
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	4.0	29.5%	42.1%	27.8%	0.4%	0.3%	1,015

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	4.0	29.8%	41.7%	27.7%	0.5%	0.2%	1,042
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	3.9	31.7%	34.9%	30.2%	.	3.2%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	3.8	13.0%	50.0%	37.0%	.	.	46

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Disability Status	4.0	29.3%	42.1%	28.0%	0.4%	0.3%	1,069
.....No disability
.....Disability	3.9	27.1%	38.5%	31.3%	1.0%	2.1%	96

E3u: Grad Prog Supportiveness: Veteran students	Mean Rating	5: Strongly supportive	4: Supportive	3: Neutral	2: Nonsupportive	1: Strongly nonsupportive	Total (N)
Age	4.0	29.3%	42.4%	27.5%	0.3%	0.5%	1,020
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	3.9	27.6%	37.9%	33.1%	1.4%	.	145

Back to Top

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	93.0%	5.1%	1.3%	0.3%	0.3%	1,178

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.1	93.3%	4.7%	1.5%	0.2%	0.4%	551
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	92.8%	5.4%	1.1%	0.5%	0.2%	627

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.1	91.3%	8.8%	.	.	.	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	92.2%	6.5%	1.0%	.	0.3%	293
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.1	93.5%	6.5%	.	.	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	93.5%	4.2%	1.6%	0.5%	0.1%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.1	94.6%	2.7%	.	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	93.1%	4.9%	1.3%	0.5%	0.2%	838
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	92.9%	5.6%	1.2%	.	0.3%	340

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.1	89.9%	7.0%	1.8%	0.9%	0.3%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	94.1%	4.2%	1.5%	.	0.2%	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	94.4%	4.9%	0.3%	0.3%	.	286

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.1	91.3%	6.3%	1.6%	0.8%	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	93.3%	5.1%	1.2%	0.3%	0.2%	1,024

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	1.1	93.0%	5.3%	1.2%	0.3%	0.2%	1,052
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.1	93.8%	3.1%	.	1.6%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.1	91.7%	4.2%	4.2%	.	.	48

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	94.4%	4.5%	0.9%	0.1%	0.1%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.4	78.4%	11.3%	5.2%	3.1%	2.1%	97

E4a: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	92.8%	5.6%	1.2%	0.3%	0.2%	1,027
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	94.7%	2.0%	2.0%	0.7%	0.7%	151

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.2	87.9%	7.6%	3.8%	0.5%	0.3%	1,177

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender*	1.2	87.5%	8.4%	3.6%	.	0.5%	550
.....Male
.....Female	1.2	88.2%	6.9%	4.0%	1.0%	.	627

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.2	86.3%	7.5%	6.3%	.	.	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	89.7%	7.5%	2.4%	.	0.3%	292
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.1	87.1%	12.9%	.	.	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	1.2	87.5%	7.5%	4.2%	0.7%	0.1%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.4	83.8%	5.4%	5.4%	2.7%	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.2	87.0%	7.6%	4.4%	0.7%	0.2%	838
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	90.0%	7.4%	2.4%	.	0.3%	339

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.2	85.1%	9.1%	4.3%	0.9%	0.6%	329
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.2	88.5%	6.8%	4.4%	0.4%	.	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	89.4%	7.7%	2.5%	0.4%	.	284

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	87.3%	8.7%	4.0%	.	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.2	87.9%	7.5%	3.8%	0.6%	0.2%	1,023

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.2	88.6%	7.6%	3.2%	0.5%	0.1%	1,051
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.5	73.4%	10.9%	12.5%	.	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.2	87.5%	4.2%	6.3%	2.1%	.	48

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.2	88.3%	7.5%	3.7%	0.3%	0.2%	1,081
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	82.3%	8.3%	5.2%	3.1%	1.0%	96

E4b: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.2	87.1%	8.2%	3.8%	0.6%	0.3%	1,026
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	92.7%	3.3%	4.0%	.	.	151

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.2	87.2%	9.7%	2.7%	0.2%	0.3%	1,177

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.2	86.4%	9.6%	3.5%	.	0.5%	550
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	87.9%	9.7%	2.1%	0.3%	.	627

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.2	81.3%	15.0%	3.8%	.	.	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	82.9%	13.0%	3.4%	0.3%	0.3%	293
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.4	70.0%	20.0%	10.0%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	90.5%	7.3%	2.0%	.	0.1%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.4	81.1%	10.8%	2.7%	2.7%	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	89.0%	8.4%	2.3%	0.1%	0.2%	838
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.2	82.6%	13.0%	3.8%	0.3%	0.3%	339

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.2	85.7%	10.4%	3.4%	.	0.6%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.2	88.1%	8.6%	3.1%	0.2%	.	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.2	87.0%	11.2%	1.4%	0.4%	.	285

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	83.2%	12.8%	4.0%	.	.	125
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.2	87.7%	9.4%	2.5%	0.2%	0.2%	1,024

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.2	87.5%	9.6%	2.6%	0.2%	0.1%	1,051
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.3	79.7%	15.6%	1.6%	.	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.2	87.5%	4.2%	8.3%	.	.	48

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status	1.2	87.5%	9.5%	2.6%	0.2%	0.2%	1,080
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.2	83.5%	11.3%	4.1%	.	1.0%	97

E4c: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.2	86.5%	10.3%	2.7%	0.2%	0.3%	1,026
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	92.1%	5.3%	2.6%	.	.	151

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.2	84.3%	11.4%	3.7%	0.3%	0.3%	1,177

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.2	84.4%	11.6%	3.3%	0.2%	0.5%	550
.....Male
.....Female	1.2	84.2%	11.2%	4.0%	0.5%	0.2%	627

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.4	72.5%	18.8%	8.8%	.	.	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	81.8%	13.0%	4.1%	0.7%	0.3%	292
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.5	58.1%	29.0%	12.9%	.	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	1.2	88.2%	8.8%	2.4%	0.3%	0.3%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.4	73.0%	18.9%	5.4%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.2	85.6%	10.6%	3.3%	0.2%	0.2%	839
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.3	81.1%	13.3%	4.4%	0.6%	0.6%	338

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.3	82.1%	11.2%	5.5%	0.6%	0.6%	329
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.2	85.1%	11.7%	2.8%	0.2%	0.2%	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.2	84.6%	11.5%	3.5%	0.3%	.	286

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*	1.2	82.4%	13.6%	1.6%	1.6%	0.8%	125
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.2	84.3%	11.4%	3.9%	0.2%	0.2%	1,024

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.2	84.5%	11.6%	3.4%	0.3%	0.2%	1,052
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.3	81.3%	12.5%	3.1%	.	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.3	80.9%	6.4%	10.6%	2.1%	.	47

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status	1.2	84.7%	11.4%	3.2%	0.4%	0.3%	1,080
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	79.4%	11.3%	8.2%	.	1.0%	97

E4d: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.2	84.0%	11.7%	3.7%	0.3%	0.3%	1,026
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.2	86.1%	9.3%	3.3%	0.7%	0.7%	151

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.2	86.0%	9.3%	3.9%	0.3%	0.4%	1,174

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.2	86.5%	9.5%	3.5%	0.2%	0.4%	548
.....Male
.....Female	1.2	85.6%	9.1%	4.3%	0.5%	0.5%	626

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.2	87.5%	6.3%	6.3%	.	.	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	87.6%	10.0%	1.7%	0.7%	.	291
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.2	86.7%	10.0%	3.3%	.	.	30
.....White/Caucasian	1.2	84.7%	9.8%	4.6%	0.3%	0.5%	734
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.2	94.6%	.	2.7%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency*	1.2	85.3%	9.0%	4.9%	0.2%	0.6%	836
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	87.9%	10.1%	1.5%	0.6%	.	338

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.2	85.0%	8.0%	6.1%	0.6%	0.3%	326
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.2	85.7%	9.9%	3.5%	0.4%	0.6%	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.2	87.4%	10.1%	2.4%	.	.	286

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	87.3%	8.7%	2.4%	0.8%	0.8%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.2	85.8%	9.5%	4.1%	0.3%	0.3%	1,020

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.2	86.7%	9.0%	3.7%	0.3%	0.3%	1,048
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.4	76.6%	12.5%	7.8%	.	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.3	79.2%	14.6%	4.2%	2.1%	.	48

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.2	86.7%	9.1%	3.6%	0.4%	0.2%	1,077
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.4	78.4%	11.3%	7.2%	.	3.1%	97

E4e: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.2	86.0%	9.9%	3.4%	0.3%	0.4%	1,024
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.2	86.0%	5.3%	7.3%	0.7%	0.7%	150

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	92.2%	5.3%	2.2%	0.2%	0.2%	1,175

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.1	91.6%	5.3%	2.7%	.	0.4%	549
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	92.7%	5.3%	1.8%	0.3%	.	626

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.1	92.5%	3.8%	3.8%	.	.	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	93.1%	5.9%	1.0%	.	.	290
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.2	83.9%	16.1%	.	.	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	92.1%	5.0%	2.4%	0.3%	0.1%	735
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.2	91.9%	.	5.4%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	91.8%	5.0%	2.7%	0.2%	0.2%	838
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	93.2%	5.9%	0.9%	.	.	337

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.1	90.2%	6.7%	2.1%	0.6%	0.3%	328
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	91.9%	5.5%	2.6%	.	.	545
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	94.7%	3.5%	1.8%	.	.	285

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.1	89.7%	9.5%	0.8%	.	.	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	92.5%	4.9%	2.4%	0.2%	0.1%	1,021

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	93.3%	5.1%	1.3%	0.2%	.	1,049
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.5	75.0%	6.3%	15.6%	.	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.2	87.5%	8.3%	4.2%	.	.	48

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	93.0%	4.8%	2.0%	.	0.1%	1,079
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	82.3%	10.4%	4.2%	2.1%	1.0%	96

E4f: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	91.9%	5.6%	2.1%	0.2%	0.2%	1,024
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	94.0%	3.3%	2.6%	.	.	151

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	89.9%	6.8%	2.6%	0.3%	0.3%	1,173

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.1	90.3%	6.9%	2.2%	.	0.5%	548
.....Male
.....Female	1.2	89.4%	6.7%	3.0%	0.6%	0.2%	625

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.2	85.0%	10.0%	5.0%	.	.	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	91.4%	6.9%	1.7%	.	.	290
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.3	80.6%	12.9%	3.2%	3.2%	.	31
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	90.6%	6.4%	2.3%	0.3%	0.4%	733
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.4	81.1%	2.7%	10.8%	2.7%	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.2	89.4%	6.8%	2.9%	0.5%	0.5%	836
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	91.1%	6.8%	2.1%	.	.	337

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.2	85.9%	9.8%	3.4%	0.6%	0.3%	327
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	91.3%	5.9%	2.4%	0.2%	0.2%	543
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	91.3%	5.6%	2.4%	0.3%	0.3%	286

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student*	1.2	84.9%	11.1%	1.6%	1.6%	0.8%	126
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	90.4%	6.5%	2.7%	0.2%	0.2%	1,019

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	90.4%	6.7%	2.4%	0.4%	0.2%	1,047
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.3	82.8%	9.4%	4.7%	.	3.1%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.2	85.4%	8.3%	6.3%	.	.	48

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	90.5%	6.2%	2.7%	0.4%	0.2%	1,076
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	82.5%	13.4%	2.1%	.	2.1%	97

E4g: Faculty/instructors make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	89.9%	6.8%	2.5%	0.3%	0.4%	1,022
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.2	89.4%	6.6%	3.3%	0.7%	.	151

Back to Top

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.3	81.6%	13.2%	4.0%	0.5%	0.6%	1,187

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.3	79.8%	14.4%	4.3%	0.9%	0.5%	555
.....Male
.....Female	1.2	83.2%	12.2%	3.8%	0.2%	0.6%	632

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.1	91.4%	7.4%	1.2%	.	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	85.2%	12.1%	2.4%	.	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.1	90.6%	9.4%	.	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.3	79.1%	14.2%	5.2%	0.8%	0.7%	737
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.4	73.7%	18.4%	5.3%	.	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency*	1.3	79.5%	14.3%	4.9%	0.7%	0.6%	841
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.2	86.7%	10.7%	2.0%	.	0.6%	346

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.3	80.5%	13.8%	4.8%	0.3%	0.6%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.3	80.8%	14.8%	3.1%	0.7%	0.5%	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.2	84.4%	10.0%	4.8%	0.3%	0.3%	289

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	81.1%	16.5%	2.4%	.	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.3	81.6%	13.2%	4.2%	0.6%	0.5%	1,032

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	1.2	82.5%	12.8%	3.8%	0.5%	0.5%	1,061
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.4	70.3%	20.3%	6.3%	1.6%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.4	74.5%	17.0%	6.4%	.	2.1%	47

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.2	83.6%	12.5%	3.2%	0.3%	0.5%	1,090
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.7	59.8%	21.6%	13.4%	3.1%	2.1%	97

E5a: Grad students make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.3	80.6%	14.1%	4.1%	0.6%	0.7%	1,034
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.2	88.9%	7.2%	3.9%	.	.	153

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.5	66.7%	21.0%	9.8%	1.6%	0.9%	1,188

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.5	67.3%	19.2%	11.5%	1.1%	0.9%	556
.....Male
.....Female	1.5	66.1%	22.6%	8.2%	2.1%	0.9%	632

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.4	67.9%	24.7%	4.9%	1.2%	1.2%	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.3	77.1%	17.8%	4.4%	0.3%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.4	68.8%	18.8%	12.5%	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.6	62.6%	22.6%	11.9%	1.9%	0.9%	738
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.9	57.9%	10.5%	18.4%	7.9%	5.3%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency*	1.6	62.6%	22.2%	11.9%	2.3%	1.1%	842
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.3	76.6%	18.2%	4.6%	.	0.6%	346

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.5	64.0%	21.9%	11.1%	2.1%	0.9%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.5	68.4%	20.1%	9.1%	1.3%	1.1%	548
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.5	65.7%	22.5%	9.7%	1.7%	0.3%	289

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.4	69.3%	19.7%	9.4%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.5	66.0%	21.7%	9.8%	1.6%	0.9%	1,033

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.5	67.9%	21.0%	8.9%	1.5%	0.8%	1,061
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.9	42.2%	31.3%	21.9%	3.1%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.6	66.7%	12.5%	14.6%	2.1%	4.2%	48

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.5	68.1%	20.9%	9.0%	1.2%	0.8%	1,091
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.9	50.5%	22.7%	18.6%	6.2%	2.1%	97

E5b: Grad students make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.5	65.6%	22.1%	9.7%	1.5%	1.1%	1,035
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.4	73.9%	13.7%	10.5%	2.0%	.	153

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.5	67.5%	19.4%	9.8%	2.8%	0.6%	1,187

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.6	64.1%	20.2%	12.3%	2.9%	0.5%	555
.....Male
.....Female	1.4	70.4%	18.7%	7.6%	2.7%	0.6%	632

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.5	66.7%	22.2%	7.4%	3.7%	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.4	70.4%	17.2%	10.4%	1.7%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.7	56.3%	21.9%	21.9%	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.5	67.2%	19.9%	9.2%	3.3%	0.4%	737
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.8	60.5%	18.4%	10.5%	2.6%	7.9%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.5	66.8%	19.5%	9.8%	3.3%	0.6%	841
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.5	69.1%	19.1%	9.8%	1.4%	0.6%	346

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.5	64.6%	23.4%	9.0%	2.4%	0.6%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.5	69.1%	17.7%	9.7%	2.7%	0.7%	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.5	67.1%	18.3%	11.1%	3.5%	.	289

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.5	62.2%	23.6%	12.6%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.5	67.8%	19.3%	9.4%	3.0%	0.5%	1,032

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	1.5	67.4%	19.4%	9.8%	2.9%	0.5%	1,060
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.5	64.1%	23.4%	9.4%	1.6%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.5	66.7%	18.8%	10.4%	2.1%	2.1%	48

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.5	68.6%	19.4%	9.5%	1.9%	0.6%	1,090
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.9	54.6%	19.6%	12.4%	12.4%	1.0%	97

E5c: Grad students make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age*	1.5	66.0%	20.8%	9.7%	2.9%	0.7%	1,034
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.4	77.8%	9.8%	10.5%	2.0%	.	153

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.6	62.9%	21.9%	12.0%	2.4%	0.8%	1,187

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.6	61.4%	21.1%	13.9%	2.5%	1.1%	555
.....Male
.....Female	1.5	64.2%	22.6%	10.3%	2.2%	0.6%	632

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.8	53.1%	22.2%	21.0%	3.7%	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.5	64.3%	22.6%	10.8%	2.0%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.8	50.0%	25.0%	18.8%	6.3%	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.5	64.5%	21.4%	11.3%	1.9%	0.9%	737
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.9	52.6%	23.7%	10.5%	7.9%	5.3%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.6	62.3%	22.2%	12.0%	2.6%	0.8%	841
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.5	64.5%	21.1%	11.8%	1.7%	0.9%	346

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.6	58.9%	26.4%	12.0%	1.8%	0.9%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.5	64.8%	20.3%	11.9%	2.2%	0.9%	548
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.6	63.5%	20.8%	11.8%	3.5%	0.3%	288

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.6	55.9%	31.5%	11.0%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.6	63.6%	21.2%	12.0%	2.4%	0.8%	1,032

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	1.6	63.3%	21.8%	11.6%	2.5%	0.8%	1,060
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.7	57.8%	23.4%	15.6%	1.6%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.6	56.3%	27.1%	14.6%	.	2.1%	48

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.5	64.3%	21.4%	11.7%	1.9%	0.7%	1,090
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.9	47.4%	27.8%	15.5%	7.2%	2.1%	97

E5d: Grad students make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.6	61.5%	23.0%	12.1%	2.4%	1.0%	1,034
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.4	72.5%	14.4%	11.1%	2.0%	.	153

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.5	65.4%	19.6%	11.0%	3.2%	0.8%	1,186

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.6	64.0%	19.4%	12.9%	2.5%	1.1%	556
.....Male
.....Female	1.5	66.7%	19.7%	9.2%	3.8%	0.6%	630

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.5	69.1%	16.0%	13.6%	1.2%	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.4	73.9%	17.3%	6.8%	1.7%	0.3%	295
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.5	75.0%	9.4%	9.4%	6.3%	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.6	60.6%	22.0%	12.5%	3.9%	1.1%	738
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.5	76.3%	7.9%	10.5%	2.6%	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency*	1.6	62.7%	20.2%	12.4%	3.9%	0.8%	841
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.4	72.2%	18.0%	7.5%	1.4%	0.9%	345

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.5	63.7%	21.9%	10.8%	3.0%	0.6%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.5	65.8%	19.2%	10.3%	3.8%	0.9%	546
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.5	66.1%	18.3%	12.5%	2.4%	0.7%	289

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.5	65.4%	22.0%	8.7%	3.9%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.5	65.4%	19.6%	11.1%	3.2%	0.8%	1,031

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.5	66.1%	19.8%	9.9%	3.4%	0.8%	1,060
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.8	54.7%	17.2%	23.4%	3.1%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.7	57.4%	23.4%	17.0%	.	2.1%	47

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.5	67.3%	18.9%	10.5%	2.5%	0.8%	1,089
.....No disability
.....Disability	2.0	44.3%	26.8%	16.5%	11.3%	1.0%	97

E5e: Grad students make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.6	64.6%	20.5%	10.9%	3.1%	0.9%	1,033
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.5	71.2%	13.1%	11.1%	3.9%	0.7%	153

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.5	67.2%	20.0%	9.0%	2.9%	0.9%	1,183

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.6	65.2%	19.1%	10.6%	4.0%	1.1%	554
.....Male
.....Female	1.4	69.0%	20.8%	7.5%	1.9%	0.8%	629

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.6	62.5%	22.5%	12.5%	1.3%	1.3%	80
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.3	76.9%	16.3%	4.4%	1.7%	0.7%	295
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.6	71.9%	6.3%	15.6%	6.3%	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.6	63.7%	22.0%	10.1%	3.3%	1.0%	736
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.7	63.2%	18.4%	10.5%	5.3%	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency*	1.6	63.3%	21.8%	10.4%	3.6%	1.0%	839
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.3	76.7%	15.7%	5.5%	1.2%	0.9%	344

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.6	63.6%	22.0%	10.8%	2.7%	0.9%	332
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.5	68.5%	20.0%	7.3%	3.5%	0.7%	546
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.5	68.6%	18.5%	9.8%	2.1%	1.0%	287

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.5	66.9%	22.0%	9.4%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.5	67.0%	20.2%	8.8%	3.1%	0.9%	1,028

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.5	68.8%	19.6%	8.1%	2.7%	0.8%	1,057
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	2.0	38.1%	34.9%	19.0%	6.3%	1.6%	63
.....Prefer not to answer	1.6	66.7%	14.6%	12.5%	2.1%	4.2%	48

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.5	68.8%	19.7%	8.4%	2.4%	0.7%	1,086
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.9	49.5%	23.7%	15.5%	8.2%	3.1%	97

E5f: Grad students make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.5	66.3%	20.6%	9.1%	2.9%	1.1%	1,031
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.4	73.0%	16.4%	7.9%	2.6%	.	152

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.4	76.1%	15.8%	5.9%	1.6%	0.7%	1,186

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.4	75.5%	15.3%	7.2%	1.3%	0.7%	556
.....Male
.....Female	1.3	76.5%	16.2%	4.8%	1.9%	0.6%	630

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.4	67.9%	23.5%	7.4%	1.2%	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	82.2%	12.8%	3.7%	1.0%	0.3%	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.3	78.1%	12.5%	6.3%	3.1%	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.4	74.7%	16.4%	6.7%	1.5%	0.7%	736
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.7	68.4%	13.2%	5.3%	7.9%	5.3%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency*	1.4	73.2%	17.5%	6.7%	1.9%	0.7%	840
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.2	82.9%	11.6%	4.0%	0.9%	0.6%	346

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background*	1.5	69.4%	19.2%	8.7%	2.1%	0.6%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.3	78.2%	15.7%	4.4%	0.9%	0.7%	547
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.3	79.5%	12.2%	5.6%	2.4%	0.3%	288

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.4	74.8%	17.3%	6.3%	0.8%	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.3	76.1%	15.8%	5.8%	1.7%	0.5%	1,031

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation	1.3	76.6%	15.8%	5.4%	1.7%	0.6%	1,059
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.5	65.6%	21.9%	9.4%	1.6%	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.4	75.0%	10.4%	12.5%	.	2.1%	48

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.3	77.5%	15.2%	5.5%	1.2%	0.6%	1,089
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.7	59.8%	21.6%	10.3%	6.2%	2.1%	97

E5g: Grad students make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.4	75.3%	16.4%	5.9%	1.7%	0.6%	1,034
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.3	80.9%	11.2%	5.9%	0.7%	1.3%	152

Back to Top

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	92.6%	6.3%	0.8%	0.2%	0.1%	1,192

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.1	91.6%	6.6%	1.4%	0.2%	0.2%	558
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	93.5%	6.0%	0.3%	0.2%	.	634

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.1	95.1%	3.7%	1.2%	.	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	89.6%	9.1%	1.3%	.	.	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	93.1%	5.9%	0.7%	0.3%	.	742
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.1	94.7%	2.6%	.	.	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	93.3%	5.7%	0.7%	0.2%	0.1%	845
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	91.1%	7.8%	1.2%	.	.	347

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.1	91.3%	7.2%	0.9%	0.6%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	92.7%	6.4%	0.9%	.	551
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	93.8%	5.5%	0.7%	.	290

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.1	89.0%	9.4%	0.8%	0.8%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	93.1%	6.1%	0.8%	0.1%	1,037

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	93.1%	6.0%	0.7%	0.2%	.	1,064
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.2	87.7%	10.8%	.	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	1.2	85.4%	8.3%	6.3%	.	.	48

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	93.4%	6.0%	0.5%	0.1%	.	1,096
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	83.3%	9.4%	5.2%	1.0%	1.0%	96

E6a: Staff make inappropriate comments about disability status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	92.3%	6.6%	0.8%	0.2%	0.1%	1,039
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	94.8%	3.9%	1.3%	.	.	153

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	90.3%	6.7%	2.4%	0.4%	0.2%	1,191

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.1	90.1%	6.8%	2.3%	0.4%	0.4%	558
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	90.5%	6.6%	2.4%	0.5%	.	633

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.1	92.6%	3.7%	3.7%	.	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	88.2%	9.1%	2.4%	0.3%	.	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.1	90.6%	6.3%	3.1%	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	91.0%	6.3%	2.0%	0.5%	0.1%	741
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.2	89.5%	2.6%	5.3%	.	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	90.5%	6.0%	2.6%	0.6%	0.2%	844
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	89.9%	8.4%	1.7%	.	.	347

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.2	88.6%	6.9%	3.0%	1.2%	0.3%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	90.6%	7.3%	2.0%	0.2%	.	551
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	91.7%	5.9%	2.4%	.	.	289

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	86.6%	8.7%	3.1%	1.6%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	90.8%	6.6%	2.2%	0.3%	0.1%	1,036

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	91.3%	6.4%	1.8%	0.5%	0.1%	1,063
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.3	80.0%	9.2%	9.2%	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	1.3	81.3%	12.5%	6.3%	.	.	48

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	91.1%	6.4%	2.2%	0.3%	0.1%	1,095
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	82.3%	10.4%	4.2%	2.1%	1.0%	96

E6b: Staff make inappropriate comments about gender/sexual identity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	90.0%	7.0%	2.3%	0.5%	0.2%	1,038
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	92.8%	4.6%	2.6%	.	.	153

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	89.3%	7.8%	2.3%	0.4%	0.2%	1,192

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.2	87.5%	8.6%	3.2%	0.5%	0.2%	558
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	90.9%	7.1%	1.6%	0.3%	0.2%	634

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.1	92.6%	3.7%	3.7%	.	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	83.5%	12.1%	3.7%	0.7%	.	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.2	87.5%	6.3%	6.3%	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	91.4%	6.6%	1.5%	0.4%	0.1%	742
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.2	86.8%	7.9%	2.6%	.	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency*	1.1	91.0%	6.6%	1.8%	0.4%	0.2%	845
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.2	85.0%	10.7%	3.7%	0.6%	.	347

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.1	88.6%	8.4%	3.0%	.	.	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	89.7%	7.6%	1.8%	0.7%	0.2%	551
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	89.0%	7.9%	2.8%	0.3%	.	290

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	85.8%	7.9%	5.5%	0.8%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	89.7%	7.9%	1.9%	0.4%	0.1%	1,037

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	89.8%	7.5%	2.2%	0.4%	0.1%	1,064
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.3	81.5%	13.8%	3.1%	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	1.3	83.3%	8.3%	6.3%	2.1%	.	48

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	89.8%	7.7%	2.0%	0.5%	0.1%	1,096
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	83.3%	9.4%	6.3%	.	1.0%	96

E6c: Staff make inappropriate comments about immigration bkgrnd	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	88.9%	8.0%	2.6%	0.3%	0.2%	1,039
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	91.5%	6.5%	0.7%	1.3%	.	153

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.2	88.3%	8.1%	2.9%	0.6%	0.1%	1,192

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.2	88.0%	8.2%	2.9%	0.7%	0.2%	558
.....Male
.....Female	1.2	88.6%	8.0%	2.8%	0.5%	.	634

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.2	87.7%	7.4%	4.9%	.	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	85.2%	9.7%	3.7%	1.3%	.	298
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.2	84.4%	9.4%	6.3%	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	89.9%	7.6%	2.2%	0.4%	.	741
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.2	86.8%	7.9%	2.6%	.	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	89.1%	7.9%	2.5%	0.4%	0.1%	844
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.2	86.5%	8.6%	3.7%	1.1%	.	348

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.2	86.8%	9.9%	3.0%	0.3%	334
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.2	88.9%	7.3%	3.1%	0.7%	550
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.2	88.6%	8.3%	2.4%	0.7%	290

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	83.5%	11.0%	5.5%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	88.9%	7.9%	2.5%	0.7%	1,037

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	89.3%	7.5%	2.6%	0.6%	.	1,064
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.3	76.9%	16.9%	4.6%	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	1.3	79.2%	12.5%	6.3%	2.1%	.	48

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.2	88.9%	7.8%	2.7%	0.6%	.	1,096
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	82.3%	12.5%	4.2%	.	1.0%	96

E6d: Staff make inappropriate comments about race/ethnicity	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.2	88.1%	8.2%	3.1%	0.6%	0.1%	1,039
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	90.2%	7.8%	1.3%	0.7%	.	153

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	90.3%	7.0%	2.2%	0.4%	0.1%	1,192

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.1	90.1%	6.5%	2.7%	0.5%	0.2%	558
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	90.4%	7.6%	1.7%	0.3%	.	634

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity*	1.1	91.4%	6.2%	2.5%	.	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.2	88.6%	7.4%	3.7%	0.3%	.	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.1	93.8%	3.1%	3.1%	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	90.4%	7.4%	1.6%	0.5%	.	742
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.1	94.7%	2.6%	.	.	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	90.4%	7.2%	1.8%	0.5%	0.1%	845
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	89.9%	6.6%	3.2%	0.3%	.	347

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.1	88.9%	8.1%	2.7%	0.3%	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	90.6%	6.9%	2.0%	0.5%	551
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	91.0%	6.6%	2.1%	0.3%	290

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	85.8%	9.4%	3.1%	1.6%	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	90.7%	6.9%	2.0%	0.3%	1,037

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	90.8%	7.0%	1.8%	0.5%	.	1,064
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.3	81.5%	10.8%	6.2%	.	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	1.2	87.5%	6.3%	6.3%	.	.	48

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	91.1%	6.6%	2.0%	0.4%	.	1,096
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	81.3%	12.5%	4.2%	1.0%	1.0%	96

E6e: Staff make inappropriate comments about religion	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	90.0%	7.1%	2.4%	0.4%	0.1%	1,039
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	92.2%	6.5%	0.7%	0.7%	.	153

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	90.6%	5.9%	2.4%	0.9%	0.2%	1,192

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.2	90.3%	6.1%	2.0%	1.4%	0.2%	558
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	90.9%	5.7%	2.8%	0.5%	0.2%	634

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.1	92.6%	2.5%	4.9%	.	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	88.9%	8.4%	1.7%	1.0%	.	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.1	90.6%	9.4%	.	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	91.0%	5.4%	2.4%	1.1%	0.1%	742
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.2	92.1%	.	5.3%	.	2.6%	38
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.2	90.5%	5.3%	2.8%	1.1%	0.2%	845
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	90.8%	7.2%	1.4%	0.6%	.	347

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.2	88.3%	7.5%	2.7%	1.5%	.	333
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	91.3%	5.4%	2.0%	1.1%	0.2%	551
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	91.7%	5.2%	3.1%	.	.	290

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.2	86.6%	7.1%	3.9%	2.4%	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	91.1%	5.8%	2.2%	0.8%	0.1%	1,037

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	91.5%	5.7%	1.8%	0.8%	0.1%	1,064
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.4	78.5%	9.2%	9.2%	1.5%	1.5%	65
.....Prefer not to answer	1.3	83.3%	6.3%	8.3%	2.1%	.	48

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	91.4%	5.6%	2.2%	0.7%	0.1%	1,096
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.3	81.3%	9.4%	5.2%	3.1%	1.0%	96

E6f: Staff make inappropriate comments about sexual orientation	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	90.4%	6.2%	2.4%	0.9%	0.2%	1,039
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	92.2%	3.9%	2.6%	1.3%	.	153

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status

	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Total (N)	1.1	91.8%	6.6%	1.3%	0.2%	0.2%	1,191

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Gender	1.1	91.2%	7.0%	1.4%	0.2%	0.2%	558
.....Male
.....Female	1.1	92.3%	6.3%	1.1%	0.2%	0.2%	633

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Race/Ethnicity	1.1	91.4%	4.9%	2.5%	1.2%	.	81
.....African American/Black
.....Asian	1.1	90.6%	8.1%	1.3%	.	.	297
.....Hispanic/Latino	1.0	96.9%	3.1%	.	.	.	32
.....White/Caucasian	1.1	92.0%	6.6%	1.1%	0.1%	0.1%	742
.....Multiple races/ethnicities	1.2	91.9%	2.7%	2.7%	.	2.7%	37
.....Other/Unknown	1.0	100.0%	.	.	.	.	2

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Residency	1.1	91.8%	6.5%	1.2%	0.2%	0.2%	844
.....U.S. resident
.....International student	1.1	91.6%	6.9%	1.4%	.	.	347

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Socioeconomic Background	1.1	90.1%	8.1%	1.5%	0.3%	.	332
.....Poor/Working class
.....Middle class	1.1	92.4%	6.2%	1.1%	0.2%	0.2%	551
.....Upper middle/Upper class	1.1	92.4%	6.2%	1.4%	.	.	290

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
First Generation College Student	1.1	90.6%	8.7%	0.8%	.	.	127
.....First generation student
.....Not first generation	1.1	92.0%	6.5%	1.3%	0.2%	0.1%	1,036

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Sexual Orientation*	1.1	92.7%	5.9%	1.1%	0.2%	0.1%	1,064
.....Heterosexual or straight
.....Gay, lesbian, or bisexual	1.2	82.8%	14.1%	1.6%	.	1.6%	64
.....Prefer not to answer	1.2	81.3%	14.6%	4.2%	.	.	48

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Disability Status*	1.1	92.2%	6.5%	1.1%	0.1%	0.1%	1,095
.....No disability
.....Disability	1.2	86.5%	8.3%	3.1%	1.0%	1.0%	96

E6g: Staff make inappropriate comments about socioeconomic status	Mean Rating	1: Never	2: Rarely	3: Occasionally	4: Often	5: Very often	Total (N)
Age	1.1	91.7%	6.7%	1.3%	0.1%	0.2%	1,038
.....Traditional (20-35)
.....Non-Traditional (>35)	1.1	92.2%	5.9%	1.3%	0.7%	.	153

Back to Top

Continue to Section F: Shaping Attitudes about Diversity

View These Results by Academic College

To download an MS Word document with results by demographic profile, click here.

Endnote:
Gender, residency, and age are based on information obtained from official university records. Race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, college generation, sexual orientation, and disability status are based on self-reported survey data. Race/ethnicity was obtained from official university records for those who chose not to self-identify. (back)

For more information on the 2010 Campus Climate Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: January, 2011

Return to Student Demographic Profile Table of Contents

Return to 2010 Campus Climate Survey Table of Contents

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page