NC State logo

2012 Alumni Survey
Gender and Racial/Ethnic Comparisons of Undergraduate Educational Goals
Critical and Creative Thinking Frequency Distributions

This document reports frequency distributions of critical and creative thinking goals by gender and race/ethnicity. Comparisons of mean ratings are available on the web.

Importance | Preparation


Importance

Problem solving skills overall NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 88.3% 85.9% 90.4% 92.6% 91.0% 87.7% 92.2%
3: Somewhat important 10.9% 13.3% 8.8% 5.3% 9.0% 11.5% 7.8%
2: Not very important 0.7% 0.8% 0.5% 2.1% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%
1: Not at all important 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%
Total (N) 2,777 1,308 1,469 94 155 2,375 153
Back to Top


Defining problems NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 78.6% 75.1% 81.8% 79.8% 83.1% 78.3% 79.1%
3: Somewhat important 19.3% 22.1% 16.7% 17.0% 15.6% 19.6% 19.0%
2: Not very important 1.8% 2.6% 1.2% 2.1% 1.3% 1.9% 2.0%
1: Not at all important 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 1.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%
Total (N) 2,774 1,307 1,467 94 154 2,373 153
Back to Top


Examining problems from multiple perspectives NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 75.5% 74.3% 76.5% 83.0% 85.8% 74.1% 81.0%
3: Somewhat important 21.4% 22.1% 20.8% 13.8% 12.3% 22.6% 17.6%
2: Not very important 2.7% 3.1% 2.4% 2.1% 1.9% 3.0% 0.7%
1: Not at all important 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 1.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.7%
Total (N) 2,772 1,306 1,466 94 155 2,370 153
Back to Top


Breaking down complex topics to enhance understanding NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 68.9% 67.4% 70.3% 74.5% 81.9% 67.6% 73.2%
3: Somewhat important 24.7% 25.3% 24.2% 21.3% 14.2% 25.8% 20.9%
2: Not very important 5.7% 6.5% 5.0% 4.3% 2.6% 6.0% 5.2%
1: Not at all important 0.6% 0.8% 0.5% 0.0% 1.3% 0.6% 0.7%
Total (N) 2,773 1,306 1,467 94 155 2,371 153
Back to Top


Identifying relevant ideas/information NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 72.7% 72.7% 72.7% 82.8% 79.1% 71.7% 75.8%
3: Somewhat important 24.5% 24.5% 24.6% 15.1% 19.6% 25.7% 17.6%
2: Not very important 2.3% 2.6% 2.1% 2.2% 1.3% 2.2% 6.5%
1: Not at all important 0.4% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%
Total (N) 2,767 1,304 1,463 93 153 2,368 153
Back to Top


Using information technologies and search strategies to access information NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 65.4% 66.5% 64.4% 76.3% 72.3% 64.4% 66.7%
3: Somewhat important 26.8% 25.8% 27.7% 15.1% 25.2% 27.5% 24.2%
2: Not very important 6.5% 6.3% 6.8% 7.5% 0.6% 6.8% 7.8%
1: Not at all important 1.3% 1.5% 1.2% 1.1% 1.9% 1.3% 1.3%
Total (N) 2,767 1,307 1,460 93 155 2,366 153
Back to Top


Critically analyzing and evaluating ideas/information NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 76.3% 73.5% 78.9% 87.1% 77.4% 75.5% 81.7%
3: Somewhat important 20.1% 21.9% 18.5% 9.7% 18.7% 21.0% 14.4%
2: Not very important 3.0% 4.1% 2.1% 3.2% 2.6% 3.0% 3.9%
1: Not at all important 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.0% 1.3% 0.5% 0.0%
Total (N) 2,768 1,307 1,461 93 155 2,367 153
Back to Top


Integrating ideas/information from multiple sources NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 66.9% 66.4% 67.4% 74.2% 74.0% 65.8% 72.5%
3: Somewhat important 26.8% 26.4% 27.2% 21.5% 18.8% 28.0% 20.3%
2: Not very important 5.5% 6.2% 4.9% 4.3% 5.8% 5.5% 6.5%
1: Not at all important 0.7% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 1.3% 0.7% 0.7%
Total (N) 2,766 1,305 1,461 93 154 2,366 153
Back to Top


Constructing clear, precise, and accurate arguments NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 62.5% 59.7% 65.0% 69.9% 67.1% 61.9% 63.4%
3: Somewhat important 27.6% 28.5% 26.8% 19.4% 27.7% 28.3% 22.2%
2: Not very important 8.7% 10.3% 7.4% 8.6% 4.5% 8.7% 14.4%
1: Not at all important 1.1% 1.5% 0.8% 2.2% 0.6% 1.2% 0.0%
Total (N) 2,768 1,307 1,461 93 155 2,367 153
Back to Top


Combining/synthesizing existing ideas/information in original ways NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 52.3% 52.5% 52.2% 65.6% 66.2% 50.4% 60.1%
3: Somewhat important 34.4% 33.8% 35.0% 30.1% 24.7% 35.9% 24.8%
2: Not very important 11.6% 11.7% 11.5% 3.2% 8.4% 12.1% 13.1%
1: Not at all important 1.6% 1.9% 1.4% 1.1% 0.6% 1.7% 2.0%
Total (N) 2,765 1,306 1,459 93 154 2,365 153
Back to Top


Generating innovative solutions NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very important 59.8% 55.4% 63.7% 64.5% 66.2% 59.0% 62.1%
3: Somewhat important 31.1% 34.2% 28.3% 25.8% 29.2% 31.7% 27.5%
2: Not very important 8.0% 9.2% 7.0% 9.7% 3.2% 8.1% 10.5%
1: Not at all important 1.1% 1.2% 1.0% 0.0% 1.3% 1.2% 0.0%
Total (N) 2,767 1,306 1,461 93 154 2,367 153
Back to Top


Preparation

Problem solving skills overall NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 52.5% 48.0% 56.5% 55.9% 56.1% 52.3% 49.7%
3: Somewhat 42.0% 46.3% 38.3% 38.7% 38.7% 42.2% 45.1%
2: Very little 4.6% 5.1% 4.2% 4.3% 5.2% 4.7% 2.6%
1: Not at all 0.9% 0.6% 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.8% 2.6%
Total (N) 2,764 1,303 1,461 93 155 2,363 153
Back to Top


Defining problems NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 44.2% 41.7% 46.4% 43.0% 49.7% 44.1% 40.5%
3: Somewhat 46.9% 49.3% 44.8% 47.3% 46.5% 46.9% 46.4%
2: Very little 7.8% 7.9% 7.6% 8.6% 3.9% 7.8% 9.8%
1: Not at all 1.2% 1.1% 1.2% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% 3.3%
Total (N) 2,761 1,303 1,458 93 155 2,360 153
Back to Top


Examining problems from multiple perspectives NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 41.9% 41.5% 42.3% 40.9% 52.3% 41.6% 37.9%
3: Somewhat 47.4% 48.0% 46.9% 43.0% 36.8% 48.2% 48.4%
2: Very little 9.3% 9.3% 9.3% 14.0% 10.3% 8.9% 11.8%
1: Not at all 1.3% 1.2% 1.4% 2.2% 0.6% 1.3% 2.0%
Total (N) 2,763 1,303 1,460 93 155 2,362 153
Back to Top


Breaking down complex topics to enhance understanding NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 42.0% 41.8% 42.3% 45.2% 58.7% 41.2% 36.6%
3: Somewhat 48.2% 49.2% 47.4% 44.1% 34.2% 49.4% 47.1%
2: Very little 8.5% 8.1% 9.0% 8.6% 6.5% 8.4% 13.1%
1: Not at all 1.2% 0.9% 1.4% 2.2% 0.6% 1.0% 3.3%
Total (N) 2,761 1,301 1,460 93 155 2,360 153
Back to Top


Identifying relevant ideas/information NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 41.5% 43.4% 39.8% 35.5% 49.4% 41.4% 38.8%
3: Somewhat 51.4% 50.0% 52.6% 52.7% 46.1% 51.5% 53.9%
2: Very little 6.2% 5.8% 6.7% 10.8% 3.9% 6.2% 5.9%
1: Not at all 0.9% 0.8% 1.0% 1.1% 0.6% 0.9% 1.3%
Total (N) 2,755 1,298 1,457 93 154 2,356 152
Back to Top


Using information technologies and search strategies to access information NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 44.6% 46.5% 42.9% 38.7% 56.8% 44.0% 45.4%
3: Somewhat 42.6% 41.8% 43.4% 46.2% 32.3% 43.6% 36.8%
2: Very little 11.0% 10.4% 11.4% 11.8% 10.3% 10.7% 14.5%
1: Not at all 1.8% 1.2% 2.3% 3.2% 0.6% 1.7% 3.3%
Total (N) 2,755 1,302 1,453 93 155 2,355 152
Back to Top


Critically analyzing and evaluating ideas/information NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 48.8% 48.2% 49.3% 38.7% 55.5% 49.0% 44.7%
3: Somewhat 45.8% 46.4% 45.3% 54.8% 40.0% 45.8% 46.7%
2: Very little 4.7% 5.0% 4.5% 6.5% 3.9% 4.5% 7.2%
1: Not at all 0.7% 0.5% 0.9% 0.0% 0.6% 0.7% 1.3%
Total (N) 2,758 1,302 1,456 93 155 2,358 152
Back to Top


Integrating ideas/information from multiple sources NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 42.8% 45.9% 40.0% 31.2% 56.1% 42.6% 38.8%
3: Somewhat 49.5% 47.8% 51.1% 57.0% 38.7% 49.8% 52.6%
2: Very little 6.7% 5.7% 7.6% 9.7% 4.5% 6.7% 7.2%
1: Not at all 1.0% 0.6% 1.3% 2.2% 0.6% 0.9% 1.3%
Total (N) 2,755 1,301 1,454 93 155 2,355 152
Back to Top


Constructing clear, precise, and accurate arguments NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 35.7% 38.2% 33.4% 29.0% 47.1% 35.4% 31.6%
3: Somewhat 50.8% 48.2% 53.1% 54.8% 40.0% 51.3% 51.3%
2: Very little 11.4% 11.8% 11.1% 10.8% 11.0% 11.2% 15.1%
1: Not at all 2.1% 1.9% 2.3% 5.4% 1.9% 2.0% 2.0%
Total (N) 2,757 1,302 1,455 93 155 2,357 152
Back to Top


Combining/synthesizing existing ideas/information in original ways NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 31.4% 32.9% 30.1% 26.9% 42.2% 30.9% 31.6%
3: Somewhat 52.9% 52.3% 53.3% 52.7% 42.9% 53.8% 48.0%
2: Very little 13.4% 12.8% 13.9% 16.1% 13.6% 13.1% 15.8%
1: Not at all 2.3% 1.9% 2.7% 4.3% 1.3% 2.2% 4.6%
Total (N) 2,754 1,301 1,453 93 154 2,355 152
Back to Top


Generating innovative solutions NCSU Women Men Asian AfAm White Other
4: Very much 31.6% 30.1% 33.0% 24.7% 36.1% 32.1% 24.3%
3: Somewhat 50.8% 52.4% 49.4% 54.8% 43.2% 51.3% 48.7%
2: Very little 14.8% 14.9% 14.7% 16.1% 16.8% 14.2% 21.1%
1: Not at all 2.8% 2.6% 3.0% 4.3% 3.9% 2.5% 5.9%
Total (N) 2,758 1,302 1,456 93 155 2,358 152
Back to Top


For more information on the 2012 Alumni Survey contact:
Dr. Nancy Whelchel, Associate Director for Survey Research
Office of Institutional Planning and Research
Box 7002
NCSU
Phone: (919) 515-4184
Email: Nancy_Whelchel@ncsu.edu

Posted: July, 2012

Return to 2012 Alumni Survey Table of Contents Page

Return to OIRP Survey Page

Return to OIRP Home Page