North Carolina State University
2006 Faculty Well-Being Survey:

Results for the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
by Number of Years Employed at NC State

To skip directly to a particular section, select the section below.

Section B: Image and Vision	Section I: Post-Tenure Review
Section C: Leadership	Section J: Pay and Compensation
Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships	Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment
Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism	Section L: Recreation/Wellness
Section F: Working Relationships	Section M: Work Activities
Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development	Section N: Conclusions/Overall Satisfaction
Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

A2: Ever held an administrative position	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
..... No (%)	94.1	82.4	52.6	64.5
..... Yes (%)	5.9	17.6	47.4	35.5
Total (N)	34	34	19	31

Back to Top

Section B: Image and Vision

B1a: Department doing good job of recruiting faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.2	3.4	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	20.6	42.1	37.9
3: Agree (%)	33.3	76.5	52.6	55.2
2: Disagree (%)	21.2	2.9	5.3	3.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.	3.4
Total (N)	33	34	19	29

B1b: Department creating culture where faculty can develop to full potential	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	26.5	15.8	27.6
3: Agree (%)	39.4	47.1	47.4	58.6
2: Disagree (%)	24.2	26.5	36.8	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	.	3.4
Total (N)	33	34	19	29

B1c: Department retaining most effective and productive faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.8	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	3.0	15.8	17.9
3: Agree (%)	30.0	60.6	52.6	64.3
2: Disagree (%)	23.3	30.3	26.3	10.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	20.0	6.1	5.3	7.1
Total (N)	30	33	19	28

B2a: Department national reputation for undergraduate educ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.8	3.5	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	25.0	21.2	5.6	24.1
4: Strong (%)	46.9	39.4	44.4	48.3
3: Average (%)	28.1	39.4	44.4	24.1
2: Weak (%)	.	.	5.6	3.4
Total (N)	32	33	18	29

B2b: Department national reputation for graduate education	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.7	3.7
5: Very strong (%)	9.7	5.9	22.2	16.1
4: Strong (%)	35.5	47.1	27.8	48.4
3: Average (%)	48.4	47.1	44.4	29.0
2: Weak (%)	6.5	.	5.6	3.2
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	31	34	18	31

B2c: Department national reputation for research & scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.9	3.7	3.9
5: Very strong (%)	18.2	5.9	11.1	19.4
4: Strong (%)	48.5	73.5	55.6	51.6
3: Average (%)	30.3	20.6	27.8	25.8
2: Weak (%)	3.0	.	5.6	3.2
Total (N)	33	34	18	31

B2d: Department national reputation for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.2	3.3	3.5	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	33.3	.	.	25.0
4: Strong (%)	50.0	57.1	50.0	.
3: Average (%)	16.7	28.6	50.0	50.0
2: Weak (%)	.	.	.	25.0
1: Very weak (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	6	7	2	4

B2e: Department national reputation for tech & managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.4	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	11.1	5.0	.	.
4: Strong (%)	55.6	40.0	37.5	38.9
3: Average (%)	33.3	55.0	62.5	50.0
2: Weak (%)	.	.	.	11.1
Total (N)	18	20	8	18

B2f: Department national reputation for extension & engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.4	3.3	3.5
5: Very strong (%)	17.2	.	.	12.5
4: Strong (%)	55.2	45.8	50.0	33.3
3: Average (%)	27.6	45.8	33.3	41.7
2: Weak (%)	.	8.3	16.7	12.5
Total (N)	29	24	12	24

B2g: Department national reputation for contrib to econ Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.2	3.3	3.3
5: Very strong (%)	12.5	.	.	10.5
4: Strong (%)	50.0	35.0	46.2	26.3
3: Average (%)	37.5	50.0	38.5	52.6
2: Weak (%)	.	15.0	15.4	.
1: Very weak (%)	.	.	.	10.5
Total (N)	16	20	13	19

B3a: Grade undergraduate majors' ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.4	3.8	3.9	4.0
A (%)	45.2	17.6	26.3	20.0
B (%)	48.4	55.9	42.1	60.0
C (%)	6.5	11.8	26.3	20.0
D (%)	.	14.7	5.3	.
Total (N)	31	34	19	30

B3b: Grade graduate student ability to meet prog demands	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.0	3.8	3.9	4.1
A (%)	15.6	11.8	10.5	22.6
B (%)	68.8	61.8	68.4	67.7
C (%)	12.5	23.5	21.1	6.5
D (%)	3.1	2.9	.	3.2
Total (N)	32	34	19	31

B3c: Grade demonstrated professional ability of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.5	4.4	4.4	4.4
A (%)	54.5	52.9	47.4	48.4
B (%)	39.4	38.2	42.1	45.2
C (%)	6.1	8.8	10.5	3.2
D (%)	.	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	33	34	19	31

B3d: Grade professional achievement of faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.5	4.5	4.4	4.4
A (%)	54.5	55.9	52.6	45.2
B (%)	45.5	38.2	31.6	48.4
C (%)	.	5.9	15.8	3.2
D (%)	.	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	33	34	19	31

B3e: Grade own demonstrated professional ability	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.6	4.6	4.5	4.4
A (%)	58.1	58.8	57.9	45.2
B (%)	41.9	41.2	36.8	51.6
C (%)	.	.	5.3	.
F (%)	.	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	31	34	19	31

B3f: Grade own professional achievement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	4.6	4.5	4.4	4.3
A (%)	58.1	55.9	52.6	38.7
B (%)	41.9	41.2	36.8	54.8
C (%)	.	2.9	10.5	3.2
F (%)	.	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	31	34	19	31

B4: Department's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	45.5	30.3	36.8	54.8
Vision with slow progress (%)	33.3	66.7	42.1	38.7
No clear vision (%)	18.2	3.0	21.1	3.2
Not familiar (%)	3.0	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	33	33	19	31

B5: Agreement with department vision for future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	38.5	38.7	20.0	31.0
3: Agree (%)	53.8	54.8	73.3	55.2
2: Disagree (%)	7.7	6.5	6.7	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.4
Total (N)	26	31	15	29

B6: College's vision for the future	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Clear vision; actively working toward goals (%)	30.3	17.6	36.8	22.6
Vision with slow progress (%)	15.2	29.4	15.8	41.9
No clear vision (%)	6.1	29.4	15.8	16.1
Not familiar (%)	48.5	23.5	31.6	19.4
Total (N)	33	34	19	31

B7a: Department change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	45.5	47.1	47.4	38.7
Change for the worse (%)	24.2	32.4	15.8	12.9
Not really change (%)	30.3	20.6	36.8	48.4
Total (N)	33	34	19	31

B7b: College change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	38.7	25.0	36.8	33.3
Change for the worse (%)	3.2	37.5	26.3	6.7
Not really change (%)	58.1	37.5	36.8	60.0
Total (N)	31	32	19	30

B7c: NC State change in next five years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Change for the better (%)	48.4	31.3	26.3	35.5
Change for the worse (%)	.	25.0	26.3	6.5
Not really change (%)	51.6	43.8	47.4	58.1
Total (N)	31	32	19	31

Back to Top

Section C: Leadership

C1a: Dept admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.3	3.1	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	42.4	43.8	36.8	54.8
3: Good (%)	21.2	43.8	42.1	32.3
2: Fair (%)	15.2	9.4	10.5	9.7
1: Poor (%)	21.2	3.1	10.5	3.2
Total (N)	33	32	19	31

C1b: Dept admin seek faculty input for dept vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.3	3.1	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	39.4	54.8	31.6	45.2
3: Good (%)	33.3	25.8	47.4	41.9
2: Fair (%)	15.2	16.1	15.8	6.5
1: Poor (%)	12.1	3.2	5.3	6.5
Total (N)	33	31	19	31

C1c: Dept admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.0	2.7	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	30.3	25.8	21.1	38.7
3: Good (%)	33.3	54.8	36.8	35.5
2: Fair (%)	21.2	16.1	31.6	19.4
1: Poor (%)	15.2	3.2	10.5	6.5
Total (N)	33	31	19	31

C1d: Dept admin delegate dept responsibility to faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.9	3.3
4: Excellent (%)	40.6	26.7	15.8	45.2
3: Good (%)	37.5	50.0	63.2	38.7
2: Fair (%)	15.6	16.7	21.1	12.9
1: Poor (%)	6.3	6.7	.	3.2
Total (N)	32	30	19	31

C1e: Dept admin grant faculty autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.0	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	42.4	29.0	36.8	55.2
3: Good (%)	33.3	58.1	36.8	31.0
2: Fair (%)	18.2	12.9	15.8	10.3
1: Poor (%)	6.1	.	10.5	3.4
Total (N)	33	31	19	29

C1f: Dept admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.8	2.7	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	21.2	9.4	15.8	30.0
3: Good (%)	51.5	65.6	47.4	50.0
2: Fair (%)	21.2	25.0	26.3	10.0
1: Poor (%)	6.1	.	10.5	10.0
Total (N)	33	32	19	30

C1g: Dept admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	32.3	26.3	33.3
3: Good (%)	34.4	48.4	42.1	43.3
2: Fair (%)	25.0	6.5	15.8	16.7
1: Poor (%)	9.4	12.9	15.8	6.7
Total (N)	32	31	19	30

C1h: Dept admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.6	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	7.4	29.4	33.3
3: Good (%)	39.3	55.6	29.4	37.0
2: Fair (%)	14.3	18.5	17.6	29.6
1: Poor (%)	21.4	18.5	23.5	.
Total (N)	28	27	17	27

C1i: Dept admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.5	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	30.3	12.5	10.5	30.0
3: Good (%)	36.4	34.4	42.1	36.7
2: Fair (%)	24.2	40.6	36.8	23.3
1: Poor (%)	9.1	12.5	10.5	10.0
Total (N)	33	32	19	30

C1j: Dept admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.7	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	15.6	26.3	25.0
3: Good (%)	46.7	46.9	31.6	57.1
2: Fair (%)	13.3	28.1	31.6	10.7
1: Poor (%)	10.0	9.4	10.5	7.1
Total (N)	30	32	19	28

C1k: Dept admin serve as advocate for dept to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.2	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	46.4	27.6	52.9	53.3
3: Good (%)	25.0	51.7	29.4	36.7
2: Fair (%)	14.3	17.2	5.9	10.0
1: Poor (%)	14.3	3.4	11.8	.
Total (N)	28	29	17	30

C1l: Dept admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.2	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	62.1	53.3	33.3	53.8
3: Good (%)	31.0	43.3	55.6	34.6
2: Fair (%)	6.9	3.3	5.6	7.7
1: Poor (%)	.	.	5.6	3.8
Total (N)	29	30	18	26

C1m: Dept admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	3.0	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	25.0	31.6	43.3
3: Good (%)	46.9	43.8	47.4	33.3
2: Fair (%)	9.4	31.3	10.5	20.0
1: Poor (%)	12.5	.	10.5	3.3
Total (N)	32	32	19	30

C1n: Dept admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.8	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	28.1	21.1	39.3
3: Good (%)	40.0	34.4	42.1	46.4
2: Fair (%)	16.7	28.1	31.6	7.1
1: Poor (%)	10.0	9.4	5.3	7.1
Total (N)	30	32	19	28

C1o: Dept admin promote diversity within dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.3	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	53.1	43.3	50.0	51.7
3: Good (%)	34.4	43.3	33.3	37.9
2: Fair (%)	12.5	10.0	16.7	10.3
1: Poor (%)	.	3.3	.	.
Total (N)	32	30	18	29

C2a: College admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.2	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	34.6	.	10.5	10.3
3: Good (%)	46.2	44.0	42.1	37.9
2: Fair (%)	19.2	36.0	31.6	37.9
1: Poor (%)	.	20.0	15.8	13.8
Total (N)	26	25	19	29

C2b: College admin seek faculty input for vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.0	2.0	2.3
4: Excellent (%)	35.0	.	.	7.1
3: Good (%)	30.0	18.2	31.6	32.1
2: Fair (%)	30.0	59.1	36.8	46.4
1: Poor (%)	5.0	22.7	31.6	14.3
Total (N)	20	22	19	28

C2c: College admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.0	2.2	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	36.8	.	.	11.5
3: Good (%)	36.8	20.0	40.0	34.6
2: Fair (%)	15.8	55.0	40.0	38.5
1: Poor (%)	10.5	25.0	20.0	15.4
Total (N)	19	20	15	26

C2d: College admin grant departmental autonomy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.3	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	41.7	4.2	16.7	27.6
3: Good (%)	45.8	45.8	61.1	48.3
2: Fair (%)	4.2	29.2	16.7	13.8
1: Poor (%)	8.3	20.8	5.6	10.3
Total (N)	24	24	18	29

C2e: College admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.3	2.5	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	8.3	11.8	12.5
3: Good (%)	40.0	29.2	41.2	45.8
2: Fair (%)	20.0	41.7	29.4	33.3
1: Poor (%)	.	20.8	17.6	8.3
Total (N)	20	24	17	24

C2f: College admin appreciate your contrib to mission	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.5	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	45.0	9.1	5.6	20.0
3: Good (%)	40.0	40.9	50.0	40.0
2: Fair (%)	10.0	36.4	22.2	20.0
1: Poor (%)	5.0	13.6	22.2	20.0
Total (N)	20	22	18	25

C2g: College admin conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	2.6	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	33.3	7.1	9.1	26.7
3: Good (%)	44.4	57.1	54.5	33.3
2: Fair (%)	22.2	7.1	27.3	26.7
1: Poor (%)	.	28.6	9.1	13.3
Total (N)	9	14	11	15

C2h: College admin provide necessary resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.0	2.1	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	25.0	7.4	.	13.3
3: Good (%)	42.9	22.2	31.6	40.0
2: Fair (%)	28.6	29.6	42.1	20.0
1: Poor (%)	3.6	40.7	26.3	26.7
Total (N)	28	27	19	30

C2i: College admin allocate resources fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	1.9	2.4	2.7
4: Excellent (%)	20.0	8.3	12.5	19.2
3: Good (%)	55.0	20.8	31.3	42.3
2: Fair (%)	15.0	25.0	43.8	30.8
1: Poor (%)	10.0	45.8	12.5	7.7
Total (N)	20	24	16	26

C2j: College admin serve as advocate for college to univ	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	2.9	3.2
4: Excellent (%)	35.0	9.5	33.3	36.8
3: Good (%)	35.0	33.3	40.0	42.1
2: Fair (%)	15.0	23.8	13.3	21.1
1: Poor (%)	15.0	33.3	13.3	.
Total (N)	20	21	15	19

C2k: College admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.2	3.0
4: Excellent (%)	47.8	34.8	33.3	30.8
3: Good (%)	52.2	47.8	53.3	46.2
2: Fair (%)	.	13.0	13.3	15.4
1: Poor (%)	.	4.3	.	7.7
Total (N)	23	23	15	26

C2l: College admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.7	2.9	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	31.8	10.5	11.8	14.8
3: Good (%)	59.1	57.9	64.7	59.3
2: Fair (%)	4.5	21.1	23.5	22.2
1: Poor (%)	4.5	10.5	.	3.7
Total (N)	22	19	17	27

C2m: College admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.2	2.8	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	35.0	10.5	5.9	16.0
3: Good (%)	55.0	31.6	70.6	56.0
2: Fair (%)	5.0	21.1	17.6	20.0
1: Poor (%)	5.0	36.8	5.9	8.0
Total (N)	20	19	17	25

C2n: College admin promote diversity within college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.3	3.5	3.4
4: Excellent (%)	52.0	46.2	64.7	51.7
3: Good (%)	44.0	42.3	23.5	41.4
2: Fair (%)	4.0	3.8	11.8	6.9
1: Poor (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	25	26	17	29

C3a: Univ admin communication with faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.2	2.0	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	30.0	4.3	.	7.7
3: Good (%)	35.0	21.7	27.8	19.2
2: Fair (%)	35.0	60.9	44.4	57.7
1: Poor (%)	.	13.0	27.8	15.4
Total (N)	20	23	18	26

C3b: Univ admin use faculty ideas in decision-making	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1	2.0	2.2
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	6.3	.	6.3
3: Good (%)	40.0	.	31.3	18.8
2: Fair (%)	33.3	87.5	37.5	62.5
1: Poor (%)	.	6.3	31.3	12.5
Total (N)	15	16	16	16

C3c: Univ admin set clear and explicit priorities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.2	2.5	2.4
4: Excellent (%)	31.3	.	17.6	4.5
3: Good (%)	50.0	34.8	23.5	36.4
2: Fair (%)	12.5	47.8	47.1	50.0
1: Poor (%)	6.3	17.4	11.8	9.1
Total (N)	16	23	17	22

C3d: Univ admin serves as advocate for univ to constituents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	2.5	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	26.7	16.7	17.6	11.1
3: Good (%)	60.0	38.9	35.3	66.7
2: Fair (%)	13.3	22.2	29.4	22.2
1: Poor (%)	.	22.2	17.6	.
Total (N)	15	18	17	18

C3e: Univ admin support academic freedom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.2	2.8	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	50.0	37.5	23.5	22.7
3: Good (%)	45.0	50.0	41.2	50.0
2: Fair (%)	5.0	8.3	29.4	18.2
1: Poor (%)	.	4.2	5.9	9.1
Total (N)	20	24	17	22

C3f: Univ admin make rational decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.4	2.6
4: Excellent (%)	27.8	11.1	.	10.5
3: Good (%)	55.6	44.4	52.6	42.1
2: Fair (%)	16.7	33.3	31.6	42.1
1: Poor (%)	.	11.1	15.8	5.3
Total (N)	18	18	19	19

C3g: Univ admin make equitable decisions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.1	2.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	29.4	9.5	.	11.8
3: Good (%)	52.9	33.3	41.2	41.2
2: Fair (%)	11.8	19.0	35.3	35.3
1: Poor (%)	5.9	38.1	23.5	11.8
Total (N)	17	21	17	17

C3h: Univ admin promote diversity within university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.2	2.9	3.1
4: Excellent (%)	40.0	31.8	26.3	25.0
3: Good (%)	55.0	54.5	42.1	62.5
2: Fair (%)	5.0	13.6	26.3	12.5
1: Poor (%)	.	.	5.3	.
Total (N)	20	22	19	24

Back to Top

Section D: Faculty-Administration Relationships

D1a: I am encouraged to give input on curricular issues	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.6	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	42.4	59.4	36.8	48.4
3: Agree (%)	45.5	37.5	52.6	41.9
2: Disagree (%)	12.1	3.1	5.3	6.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	5.3	3.2
Total (N)	33	32	19	31

D1b: I am encouraged to give input on prog assessment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.2	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.3	38.7	26.3	32.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	48.4	57.9	54.8
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	9.7	15.8	9.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.2	.	3.2
Total (N)	33	31	19	31

D1c: I am encouraged to give input on dept hiring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	50.0	33.3	48.4
3: Agree (%)	42.4	40.6	50.0	35.5
2: Disagree (%)	24.2	6.3	11.1	9.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.1	5.6	6.5
Total (N)	33	32	18	31

D1d: I am encouraged to give input on college admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.4	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	6.5	10.5	9.7
3: Agree (%)	26.7	41.9	36.8	35.5
2: Disagree (%)	53.3	38.7	36.8	35.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	12.9	15.8	19.4
Total (N)	30	31	19	31

D1e: I am encouraged to give input on university admin appointments	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.4	2.3	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.3	3.2	5.3	6.5
3: Agree (%)	24.1	45.2	42.1	32.3
2: Disagree (%)	58.6	41.9	31.6	32.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.9	9.7	21.1	29.0
Total (N)	29	31	19	31

D2: Familiarity with academic program assessment in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.8	3.4	3.2
4: Very familiar (%)	24.2	22.6	52.6	32.3
3: Somewhat familiar (%)	27.3	48.4	42.1	58.1
2: Not very familiar (%)	36.4	19.4	.	6.5
1: Not at all familiar (%)	12.1	9.7	5.3	3.2
Total (N)	33	31	19	31

D3a: Understanding of resource allocation to university	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.3	2.7	2.4
4: Very well (%)	3.2	6.5	15.8	3.2
3: Fairly well (%)	29.0	38.7	36.8	41.9
2: Not very well (%)	45.2	35.5	47.4	41.9
1: Not at all (%)	22.6	19.4	.	12.9
Total (N)	31	31	19	31

D3b: Understanding of resource allocation to college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.5	2.3
4: Very well (%)	3.2	6.5	5.3	3.2
3: Fairly well (%)	22.6	25.8	36.8	32.3
2: Not very well (%)	54.8	48.4	57.9	58.1
1: Not at all (%)	19.4	19.4	.	6.5
Total (N)	31	31	19	31

D3c: Understanding of resource allocation to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.7	2.7
4: Very well (%)	3.1	12.9	10.5	12.9
3: Fairly well (%)	37.5	22.6	52.6	54.8
2: Not very well (%)	46.9	48.4	36.8	25.8
1: Not at all (%)	12.5	16.1	.	6.5
Total (N)	32	31	19	31

D3d: Understanding of resource allocation within department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	3.0	3.0
4: Very well (%)	12.1	15.6	36.8	22.6
3: Fairly well (%)	45.5	46.9	31.6	61.3
2: Not very well (%)	30.3	31.3	26.3	12.9
1: Not at all (%)	12.1	6.3	5.3	3.2
Total (N)	33	32	19	31

D4: Faculty have sufficient input on dept resource allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.9	3.1	15.8	12.9
3: Agree (%)	61.3	65.6	36.8	54.8
2: Disagree (%)	19.4	25.0	47.4	29.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	6.3	.	3.2
Total (N)	31	32	19	31

D5: Dept faculty searches/appointments are collegial and inclusive	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	40.6	40.6	36.8	54.8
3: Agree (%)	43.8	40.6	47.4	35.5
2: Disagree (%)	9.4	15.6	10.5	9.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.3	3.1	5.3	.
Total (N)	32	32	19	31

D6a: Relations between faculty in dept and dept admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.4	3.0	3.5
4: Excellent (%)	34.4	45.2	31.6	58.1
3: Good (%)	37.5	48.4	47.4	32.3
2: Fair (%)	9.4	6.5	10.5	9.7
1: Poor (%)	18.8	.	10.5	.
Total (N)	32	31	19	31

D6b: Relations between faculty in dept and college admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.7	2.9
4: Excellent (%)	24.1	3.7	21.1	23.1
3: Good (%)	48.3	63.0	36.8	46.2
2: Fair (%)	17.2	7.4	31.6	26.9
1: Poor (%)	10.3	25.9	10.5	3.8
Total (N)	29	27	19	26

D6c: Relations between faculty in dept and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.4	2.2	2.5
4: Excellent (%)	19.0	4.8	.	5.9
3: Good (%)	47.6	47.6	41.2	47.1
2: Fair (%)	28.6	33.3	35.3	41.2
1: Poor (%)	4.8	14.3	23.5	5.9
Total (N)	21	21	17	17

D6d: Relations between all faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.3	2.2	2.8
4: Excellent (%)	21.1	.	.	14.3
3: Good (%)	52.6	45.5	38.9	50.0
2: Fair (%)	26.3	36.4	38.9	35.7
1: Poor (%)	.	18.2	22.2	.
Total (N)	19	22	18	14

D7a: Faculty Senate effective commun between faculty and univ admin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	6.7	5.0
3: Agree (%)	58.3	70.6	40.0	60.0
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	17.6	40.0	15.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	11.8	13.3	20.0
Total (N)	12	17	15	20

D7b: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty in general	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.4	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	.	6.3	.
3: Agree (%)	54.5	53.3	43.8	72.2
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	40.0	37.5	5.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.7	12.5	22.2
Total (N)	11	15	16	18

D7c: Faculty Senate advocates for faculty like me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.4	2.2	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.7	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	42.9	37.5	41.2
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	50.0	43.8	35.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	25.0	7.1	18.8	23.5
Total (N)	12	14	16	17

D8: Effectiveness of university grievance procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.7	3.2
4: Very effective (%)	20.0	11.1	10.0	25.0
3: Somewhat effective (%)	60.0	66.7	60.0	66.7
2: Not very effective (%)	.	11.1	20.0	8.3
1: Not at all effective (%)	20.0	11.1	10.0	.
Total (N)	5	9	10	12

D9: Importance of "ombuds" for informal conflict resolution	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Very important (%)	60.6	27.6	36.8	50.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	30.3	55.2	42.1	32.1
2: Not very important (%)	9.1	17.2	10.5	14.3
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	10.5	3.6
Total (N)	33	29	19	28

Back to Top

Section E: Diversity/Multiculturalism

E1: Importance of institutional emphasis on diversity/multiculturalism	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	2.9	3.4	3.2
4: Very important (%)	64.5	35.5	55.6	35.5
3: Somewhat important (%)	29.0	38.7	33.3	51.6
2: Not very important (%)	6.5	9.7	5.6	9.7
1: Not at all important (%)	.	16.1	5.6	3.2
Total (N)	31	31	18	31

E2: Importance of diversity to enhanced learning in own classroom	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.4	2.8	2.5
4: Very important (%)	32.3	10.0	16.7	16.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	41.9	43.3	55.6	29.0
2: Not very important (%)	25.8	26.7	16.7	41.9
1: Not at all important (%)	.	20.0	11.1	12.9
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

E3: NCSU prepares students to live and work in diverse society	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.2	7.1	6.3	15.4
3: Agree (%)	63.0	78.6	68.8	80.8
2: Disagree (%)	14.8	14.3	25.0	3.8
Total (N)	27	28	16	26

E4a: My dept recruits historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.5	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	65.5	46.2	33.3	45.2
3: Agree (%)	27.6	53.8	55.6	48.4
2: Disagree (%)	6.9	.	11.1	3.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	29	26	18	31

E4b: My dept retains historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.4	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	38.5	31.3	42.9
3: Agree (%)	42.9	61.5	43.8	53.6
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	.	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.6
Total (N)	28	26	16	28

E4c: My dept supports historically underrepresented students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.1	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	46.2	45.8	31.3	44.4
3: Agree (%)	38.5	54.2	43.8	51.9
2: Disagree (%)	15.4	.	25.0	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.7
Total (N)	26	24	16	27

E4d: My dept recruits historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.3	3.0	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	48.3	34.5	27.8	46.7
3: Agree (%)	48.3	58.6	50.0	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	3.4	6.9	16.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	5.6	.
Total (N)	29	29	18	30

E4e: My dept retains historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.1	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	23.8	29.4	54.2
3: Agree (%)	37.5	76.2	52.9	45.8
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	.	17.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	.	.	.
Total (N)	24	21	17	24

E4f: My dept supports historically underrepresented faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.0	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	34.8	23.5	47.8
3: Agree (%)	31.8	65.2	52.9	52.2
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	.	23.5	.
Total (N)	22	23	17	23

E5a: Dept environ accepting/respectful of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.3	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	69.0	48.3	38.9	32.1
3: Agree (%)	24.1	44.8	55.6	57.1
2: Disagree (%)	6.9	3.4	5.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.4	.	10.7
Total (N)	29	29	18	28

E5b: Dept environ accepting/respectful of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.3	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	83.3	55.6	41.7	26.3
3: Agree (%)	16.7	44.4	50.0	73.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	18	18	12	19

E5c: Dept environ accepting/respectful of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.3	3.2	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	66.7	44.8	33.3	40.7
3: Agree (%)	23.3	44.8	55.6	59.3
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	10.3	11.1	.
Total (N)	30	29	18	27

E5d: Dept environ accepting/respectful of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.5	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	85.7	64.3	45.5	25.0
3: Agree (%)	7.1	28.6	54.5	75.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	14	14	11	16

E5e: Dept environ accepting/respectful of nationality/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	80.6	46.4	38.9	42.3
3: Agree (%)	19.4	50.0	55.6	57.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.6	5.6	.
Total (N)	31	28	18	26

E5f: Dept environ accepting/respectful of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.3	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	78.6	48.1	37.5	42.9
3: Agree (%)	21.4	48.1	56.3	57.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.7	6.3	.
Total (N)	28	27	16	28

E5g: Dept environ accepting/respectful of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.3	3.4	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	78.3	42.1	37.5	47.6
3: Agree (%)	21.7	52.6	62.5	52.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	23	19	16	21

E5h: Dept environ accepting/respectful of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.2	3.0	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	72.2	45.5	33.3	46.7
3: Agree (%)	22.2	36.4	44.4	53.3
2: Disagree (%)	5.6	9.1	11.1	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	9.1	11.1	.
Total (N)	18	11	9	15

E6a: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of age	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.7	58.6	52.9	48.0
3: Agree (%)	23.3	34.5	47.1	52.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.9	.	.
Total (N)	30	29	17	25

E6b: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of disability status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.5	3.5	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	79.2	58.3	53.8	44.4
3: Agree (%)	20.8	37.5	46.2	55.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.2	.	.
Total (N)	24	24	13	18

E6c: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of gender	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	70.0	58.6	47.1	50.0
3: Agree (%)	30.0	37.9	52.9	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.4	.	.
Total (N)	30	29	17	24

E6d: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of military status	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.5	3.6	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	78.9	60.0	58.3	33.3
3: Agree (%)	15.8	35.0	41.7	66.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	5.0	.	.
Total (N)	19	20	12	15

E6e: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of national/ethnic origin	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.7	55.2	47.1	50.0
3: Agree (%)	23.3	37.9	52.9	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	6.9	.	.
Total (N)	30	29	17	24

E6f: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of race and color	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	75.0	57.1	50.0	50.0
3: Agree (%)	25.0	35.7	50.0	50.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	28	28	16	24

E6g: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of religion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.4	3.5	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	76.9	52.2	47.1	54.5
3: Agree (%)	23.1	43.5	52.9	45.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	26	23	17	22

E6h: Faculty welcomed at dept social events regardless of sexual orientation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.4	3.4	3.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	73.9	58.8	60.0	47.1
3: Agree (%)	17.4	29.4	30.0	47.1
2: Disagree (%)	8.7	5.9	.	5.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.9	10.0	.
Total (N)	23	17	10	17

E7: Faculty diversity/multiculturalism enhancement of intellectual diversity in dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.5	2.5	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	37.5	10.7	5.9	16.1
3: Some (%)	40.6	53.6	58.8	41.9
2: A little (%)	18.8	10.7	11.8	9.7
1: Not at all (%)	3.1	25.0	23.5	32.3
Total (N)	32	28	17	31

E8: Inclusion of diversity-related topics, scholarship, etc in your courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.7	1.9	1.7
4: A great deal (%)	7.1	4.2	.	3.4
3: Some (%)	28.6	16.7	29.4	13.8
2: A little (%)	14.3	25.0	29.4	34.5
1: Not at all (%)	50.0	54.2	41.2	48.3
Total (N)	28	24	17	29

E9a: Interest in research, extension, art endeavors outside U.S.	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.0	3.4	3.0
4: A great deal (%)	50.0	36.7	50.0	48.4
3: Some (%)	28.1	40.0	44.4	19.4
2: A little (%)	12.5	6.7	.	12.9
1: None (%)	9.4	16.7	5.6	19.4
Total (N)	32	30	18	31

E9b: Interest in teaching study abroad	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.3	2.7	2.2
4: A great deal (%)	25.0	23.3	33.3	16.1
3: Some (%)	28.1	20.0	33.3	29.0
2: A little (%)	21.9	20.0	5.6	16.1
1: None (%)	25.0	36.7	27.8	38.7
Total (N)	32	30	18	31

E9c: Interest in participating in spring break service learning	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.8	1.6	1.7	1.3
4: A great deal (%)	9.7	6.9	5.6	.
3: Some (%)	16.1	6.9	16.7	9.7
2: A little (%)	16.1	20.7	16.7	12.9
1: None (%)	58.1	65.5	61.1	77.4
Total (N)	31	29	18	31

E9d: Interest in participating in international service projects	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.3	2.2	2.0
4: A great deal (%)	16.7	20.7	11.1	9.7
3: Some (%)	26.7	27.6	33.3	19.4
2: A little (%)	23.3	10.3	16.7	29.0
1: None (%)	33.3	41.4	38.9	41.9
Total (N)	30	29	18	31

E9e: Interest in teaching in international studies major	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.7	1.7	1.7	1.4
4: A great deal (%)	6.5	6.9	.	.
3: Some (%)	19.4	20.7	22.2	9.7
2: A little (%)	12.9	6.9	27.8	19.4
1: None (%)	61.3	65.5	50.0	71.0
Total (N)	31	29	18	31

E9f: Interest in advising international students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.7	2.9	2.7
4: A great deal (%)	25.8	26.7	16.7	16.1
3: Some (%)	29.0	40.0	66.7	48.4
2: A little (%)	29.0	6.7	5.6	22.6
1: None (%)	16.1	26.7	11.1	12.9
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

Back to Top

Section F: Working Relationships

F1: There is unity/cohesion among faculty in my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.9	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	22.6	20.0	5.6	25.8
3: Agree (%)	35.5	53.3	55.6	45.2
2: Disagree (%)	35.5	23.3	27.8	25.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.5	3.3	11.1	3.2
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

F2a: Good communication between my students and me	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.6	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	54.8	55.2	61.1	51.6
3: Agree (%)	45.2	44.8	38.9	48.4
Total (N)	31	29	18	31

F2b: Good communication between dept and our students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	27.6	16.7	26.7
3: Agree (%)	67.9	65.5	77.8	73.3
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	6.9	5.6	.
Total (N)	28	29	18	30

F2c: Good communication between faculty in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.8	16.7	11.1	25.8
3: Agree (%)	45.2	66.7	66.7	58.1
2: Disagree (%)	29.0	13.3	22.2	9.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.3	.	6.5
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

F2d: Good communication between my dept and other depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.1	5.0	6.3	4.3
3: Agree (%)	54.5	55.0	56.3	56.5
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	35.0	25.0	30.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	5.0	12.5	8.7
Total (N)	22	20	16	23

F2e: Good communication between my college and other colleges	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	6.7	10.0	12.5
3: Agree (%)	68.4	40.0	50.0	56.3
2: Disagree (%)	21.1	46.7	30.0	18.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.3	6.7	10.0	12.5
Total (N)	19	15	10	16

F3: Dept environ promotes respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	43.3	39.3	27.8	29.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	57.1	55.6	58.1
2: Disagree (%)	3.3	3.6	11.1	12.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.3	.	5.6	.
Total (N)	30	28	18	31

F4a: Frequency given/recvd teaching advice in dept past few years	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.2	3.2	2.8
Frequently (%)	41.9	41.9	38.9	16.1
Sometimes (%)	41.9	45.2	50.0	64.5
Seldom (%)	9.7	6.5	5.6	6.5
Never (%)	6.5	6.5	5.6	12.9
Total (N)	31	31	18	31

F4b: Frequency given/recvd research/artistic feedback in dept past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.2	3.1	2.8
Frequently (%)	33.3	45.2	41.2	16.1
Sometimes (%)	40.0	32.3	29.4	61.3
Seldom (%)	13.3	16.1	29.4	9.7
Never (%)	13.3	6.5	.	12.9
Total (N)	30	31	17	31

F4c: Frequency given/recvd help with dept/college bureaucracy past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.1	2.9
Frequently (%)	22.6	32.3	38.9	22.6
Sometimes (%)	51.6	41.9	27.8	51.6
Seldom (%)	19.4	25.8	33.3	19.4
Never (%)	6.5	.	.	6.5
Total (N)	31	31	18	31

F4d: Frequency given/recvd help undrsnd reappointment, promotion, tenure past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.9	3.0
Frequently (%)	22.6	32.3	27.8	16.1
Sometimes (%)	54.8	45.2	38.9	71.0
Seldom (%)	9.7	16.1	27.8	9.7
Never (%)	12.9	6.5	5.6	3.2
Total (N)	31	31	18	31

F4e: Frequency given/recvd help with work/personal balance issues past few yrs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	2.2	2.2	2.0
Frequently (%)	9.7	16.1	22.2	3.2
Sometimes (%)	32.3	22.6	16.7	29.0
Seldom (%)	19.4	29.0	22.2	35.5
Never (%)	38.7	32.3	38.9	32.3
Total (N)	31	31	18	31

F5a: Frequency of collab with faculty in your dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.6	3.4	3.1	3.3
Frequently (%)	67.7	56.7	44.4	48.4
Sometimes (%)	25.8	30.0	33.3	38.7
Seldom (%)	3.2	13.3	11.1	3.2
Never (%)	3.2	.	11.1	9.7
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

F5b: Frequency of collab with faculty in other NCSU depts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.7	2.2
Frequently (%)	51.6	40.0	22.2	12.9
Sometimes (%)	16.1	26.7	44.4	32.3
Seldom (%)	12.9	20.0	16.7	19.4
Never (%)	19.4	13.3	16.7	35.5
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

F5c: Frequency of collab with faculty from other universities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.7	3.3	3.2	3.2
Frequently (%)	80.6	56.7	55.6	48.4
Sometimes (%)	16.1	26.7	22.2	32.3
Seldom (%)	.	6.7	11.1	9.7
Never (%)	3.2	10.0	11.1	9.7
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

F5d: Frequency of collab with non-faculty external to NCSU	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.8	2.6	2.1
Frequently (%)	19.4	33.3	22.2	12.9
Sometimes (%)	19.4	30.0	33.3	22.6
Seldom (%)	25.8	16.7	22.2	29.0
Never (%)	35.5	20.0	22.2	35.5
Total (N)	31	30	18	31

Back to Top

Section G: Faculty Support & Professional Development

G1a: Satisfaction with level of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.4	48.3	61.1	54.8
3: Satisfied (%)	51.7	41.4	22.2	41.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.4	10.3	11.1	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	.	5.6	3.2
Total (N)	29	29	18	31

G1b: Satisfaction with number of courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.0	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	41.4	37.9	16.7	43.3
3: Satisfied (%)	48.3	48.3	66.7	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.3	13.8	16.7	16.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	6.7
Total (N)	29	29	18	30

G1c: Satisfaction with choice in courses	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.4	3.4	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.5	53.6	55.6	54.8
3: Satisfied (%)	51.7	39.3	38.9	41.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.9	3.6	.	3.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.9	3.6	5.6	.
Total (N)	29	28	18	31

G1d: Satisfaction with course content discretion	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.6	3.7	3.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	55.2	60.7	72.2	58.1
3: Satisfied (%)	41.4	35.7	27.8	38.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	3.4	3.6	.	3.2
Total (N)	29	28	18	31

G1e: Satisfaction with number of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	3.1	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.1	34.5	22.2	41.9
3: Satisfied (%)	62.1	48.3	61.1	45.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.3	10.3	16.7	9.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.4	6.9	.	3.2
Total (N)	29	29	18	31

G1f: Satisfaction with quality of undergraduates	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.8	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	13.8	12.5	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	53.6	44.8	56.3	69.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	17.9	37.9	25.0	13.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	3.4	6.3	13.8
Total (N)	28	29	16	29

G1g: Satisfaction with quality of graduate students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.1	7.1	5.9	22.6
3: Satisfied (%)	62.1	60.7	70.6	67.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.8	32.1	23.5	6.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	.	3.2
Total (N)	29	28	17	31

G1h: Satisfaction with access to grad TAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.6	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	10.7	16.7	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	57.1	67.9	44.4	57.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	7.1	22.2	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	14.3	16.7	.
Total (N)	28	28	18	28

G1i: Satisfaction with access to grad RAs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.8	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	29.2	9.1	11.8	27.3
3: Satisfied (%)	54.2	68.2	58.8	59.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	13.6	29.4	13.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	9.1	.	.
Total (N)	24	22	17	22

G2a: NCSU supports innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.0	28.6	27.8	20.7
3: Agree (%)	55.6	53.6	55.6	65.5
2: Disagree (%)	7.4	17.9	11.1	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	5.6	3.4
Total (N)	27	28	18	29

G2b: NCSU supports innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	3.1	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	30.8	27.8	25.9
3: Agree (%)	46.2	50.0	55.6	63.0
2: Disagree (%)	3.8	19.2	16.7	11.1
Total (N)	26	26	18	27

G2c: NCSU supports innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	2.8	2.5	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	40.0	.	40.0
3: Agree (%)	50.0	20.0	66.7	20.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	16.7	40.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	16.7	.
Total (N)	4	5	6	5

G2d: NCSU supports innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	10.0	27.3	16.7	18.8
3: Agree (%)	80.0	54.5	66.7	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	18.2	16.7	18.8
Total (N)	10	11	12	16

G3a: NCSU rewards innovative teaching	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.7	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	16.0	17.9	11.1	10.3
3: Agree (%)	48.0	39.3	50.0	48.3
2: Disagree (%)	28.0	35.7	22.2	37.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.0	7.1	16.7	3.4
Total (N)	25	28	18	29

G3b: NCSU rewards innovative research and scholarly activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.0	2.9	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	37.5	28.6	27.8	41.9
3: Agree (%)	54.2	46.4	38.9	45.2
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	25.0	27.8	6.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	5.6	6.5
Total (N)	24	28	18	31

G3c: NCSU rewards innovative creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	2.6	2.7	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	20.0	.	33.3
3: Agree (%)	50.0	40.0	66.7	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	33.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	5	6	3

G3d: NCSU rewards innovative extension/engagement/econ dev activity	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	7.1	.	10.0
3: Agree (%)	45.5	50.0	81.8	70.0
2: Disagree (%)	27.3	28.6	18.2	10.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	14.3	.	10.0
Total (N)	11	14	11	10

G4a: Satisfaction: Availability of classroom technology	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	37.9	24.1	16.7	19.4
3: Satisfied (%)	41.4	37.9	61.1	64.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	10.3	31.0	11.1	6.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.3	6.9	11.1	9.7
Total (N)	29	29	18	31

G4b: Satisfaction: Teaching reduction for scholarly/prof growth	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.6	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	31.8	7.7	5.6	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	27.3	42.3	55.6	51.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.7	34.6	27.8	25.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	18.2	15.4	11.1	11.1
Total (N)	22	26	18	27

G4c: Satisfaction: Teaching workshop/seminar opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	3.1	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	23.1	18.5	12.5	12.0
3: Satisfied (%)	73.1	74.1	81.3	88.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	7.4	6.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	.	.	.
Total (N)	26	27	16	25

G4d: Satisfaction: Avail of funds to attend teaching conference/wrkshp	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.8	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	26.7	5.0	7.7	5.0
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	40.0	61.5	65.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.3	25.0	30.8	20.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	20.0	30.0	.	10.0
Total (N)	15	20	13	20

G4e: Satisfaction: Learning technology training/support	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	30.4	16.0	12.5	7.4
3: Satisfied (%)	52.2	72.0	56.3	81.5
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	4.0	31.3	7.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	8.0	.	3.7
Total (N)	23	25	16	27

G4f: Satisfaction: Campus bookstore meeting course needs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.2	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.4	17.4	23.5	21.4
3: Satisfied (%)	69.6	69.6	76.5	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	13.0	8.7	.	3.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.3	.	.
Total (N)	23	23	17	28

G4g: Satisfaction: Availability of funds to present work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.1	2.8	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.8	3.7	12.5	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	37.0	50.0	33.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	25.9	37.5	40.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	33.3	.	14.8
Total (N)	24	27	16	27

G4h: Satisfaction: Opportunities for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	12.0	5.6	17.9
3: Satisfied (%)	47.4	44.0	61.1	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	42.1	16.0	27.8	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	28.0	5.6	17.9
Total (N)	19	25	18	28

G4i: Satisfaction: Financial support for scholarly/professional leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	2.4	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	10.0	9.1	6.7	17.9
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	27.3	40.0	46.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.0	31.8	40.0	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.0	31.8	13.3	14.3
Total (N)	20	22	15	28

G4j: Satisfaction: Leadership development opportunities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	.	7.7	8.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	66.7	46.2	58.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	14.3	38.5	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	19.0	7.7	.
Total (N)	12	21	13	12

G4k: Satisfaction: Support for dept assessment Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	.	6.3	16.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	72.7	68.8	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	13.6	18.8	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	13.6	6.3	5.6
Total (N)	14	22	16	18

G4l: Satisfaction: Availability of/access to materials via NCSU Libraries	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.5	3.2	3.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	34.5	48.1	33.3	36.7
3: Satisfied (%)	58.6	51.9	55.6	63.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.9	.	11.1	.
Total (N)	29	27	18	30

G4m: Satisfaction: Support with dealing with student concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	2.9	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	24.0	20.0	6.7	20.8
3: Satisfied (%)	64.0	64.0	80.0	75.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.0	12.0	13.3	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.0	.	4.2
Total (N)	25	25	15	24

G4n: Satisfaction: Support for technology transfer	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.8	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	10.5	.	13.3
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	42.1	81.8	66.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	31.6	18.2	13.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	15.8	.	6.7
Total (N)	12	19	11	15

G5: Assignment of formal mentor	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Yes (%)	60.7	29.0	5.6	.
No (%)	32.1	71.0	94.4	100.0
Don't know (%)	7.1	.	.	.
Total (N)	28	31	18	31

G6: Mentor helpfulness	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	4.0
4: Very helpful (%)	52.9	33.3	100.0
3: Somewhat helpful (%)	11.8	44.4	.
2: Not very helpful (%)	23.5	22.2	.
1: Not at all helpful (%)	11.8	.	.
Total (N)	17	9	1

G7a: Satisfaction: Pre-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	2.8	3.2	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	47.8	20.0	26.7	23.1
3: Satisfied (%)	47.8	56.0	66.7	57.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	8.0	6.7	15.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	4.3	16.0	.	3.8
Total (N)	23	25	15	26

G7b: Satisfaction: Post-award support from college for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.9	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	8.0	12.5	20.0
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	48.0	62.5	60.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	9.5	20.0	25.0	12.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	9.5	24.0	.	8.0
Total (N)	21	25	16	25

G7c: Satisfaction: Pre-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.7	2.7	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	8.7	7.7	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	60.9	53.8	61.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	21.7	38.5	19.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	8.3	8.7	.	4.8
Total (N)	12	23	13	21

G7d: Satisfaction: Post-award University support for grant/contract	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.3	4.8	.	14.3
3: Satisfied (%)	46.7	38.1	64.3	61.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	33.3	33.3	28.6	14.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	23.8	7.1	9.5
Total (N)	15	21	14	21

G7e: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to investigator	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.5	1.5	1.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	.	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	33.3	17.4	13.3	29.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	22.2	17.4	6.7	20.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	33.3	65.2	73.3	50.0
Total (N)	18	23	15	24

G7f: Satisfaction: Allocation of indirect grant costs to department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.9	1.6	1.6	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	6.7	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	20.0	19.0	13.3	26.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	23.8	33.3	21.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	46.7	57.1	53.3	52.2
Total (N)	15	21	15	23

G7g: Satisfaction: PI control over indirect cost allocation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.1	1.5	1.6	1.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.6	.	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	17.6	16.7	13.3	25.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.5	20.8	13.3	20.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	41.2	62.5	66.7	54.2
Total (N)	17	24	15	24

Back to Top

Section H: Performance Review, Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure

H1: Faculty performance review standards are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	29.0	27.8	32.3
3: Agree (%)	53.6	48.4	50.0	64.5
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	19.4	22.2	3.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	3.6	3.2	.	.
Total (N)	28	31	18	31

H2: Faculty performance review procedures are clearly stated	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.1	3.2	3.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	25.8	27.8	45.2
3: Agree (%)	50.0	61.3	66.7	54.8
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	9.7	5.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.1	3.2	.	.
Total (N)	28	31	18	31

H3: SME is consistent with departmental vision	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.3	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.1	36.4	20.0	40.7
3: Agree (%)	73.9	59.1	73.3	55.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	4.5	6.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.7
Total (N)	23	22	15	27

H4: SME is consistent with departmental promotion standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	45.0	23.1	37.0
3: Agree (%)	66.7	50.0	76.9	59.3
2: Disagree (%)	.	5.0	.	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	3.7
Total (N)	21	20	13	27

H5a: Performance Review feedback appropriately based on SME	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	2.8	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	45.5	23.5	23.1	18.2
3: Agree (%)	40.9	70.6	46.2	77.3
2: Disagree (%)	13.6	5.9	23.1	4.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	22	17	13	22

H5b: Performance Review feedback helpful for professional Development	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.8	13.0	20.0	4.2
3: Agree (%)	45.5	56.5	40.0	66.7
2: Disagree (%)	18.2	30.4	33.3	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	.	6.7	4.2
Total (N)	22	23	15	24

H5c: Performance Review feedback corresponds with my perceptions of own performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.0	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	36.4	21.7	23.5	20.8
3: Agree (%)	50.0	60.9	58.8	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	4.5	17.4	11.8	12.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	9.1	.	5.9	4.2
Total (N)	22	23	17	24

H5d: Performance Review feedback helps understand relation to other faculty	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.8	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.2	13.6	17.6	8.3
3: Agree (%)	40.9	40.9	58.8	58.3
2: Disagree (%)	36.4	40.9	11.8	25.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.5	4.5	11.8	8.3
Total (N)	22	22	17	24

H5e: Feedback given appropriate weight in merit raises	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	13.6	17.6	4.3
3: Agree (%)	57.1	59.1	47.1	82.6
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	22.7	23.5	4.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	4.5	11.8	8.7
Total (N)	21	22	17	23

H6: Understanding of current Academic Tenure Policy	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.8	3.0
4: Very well (%)	14.3	20.0	16.7	19.4
3: Fairly well (%)	46.4	43.3	50.0	64.5
2: Not very well (%)	28.6	16.7	27.8	9.7
1: Not at all (%)	10.7	20.0	5.6	6.5
Total (N)	28	30	18	31

H7_1: Participated in RPT process as candidate	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	46.4	41.9	55.6	45.2
Yes (%)	53.6	58.1	44.4	54.8
Total (N)	28	31	18	31

H7_2: Participated in RPT process as voter	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	85.7	29.0	11.1	9.7
Yes (%)	14.3	71.0	88.9	90.3
Total (N)	28	31	18	31

H7_3: Participated in RPT process as review committee member	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	92.9	64.5	44.4	38.7
Yes (%)	7.1	35.5	55.6	61.3
Total (N)	28	31	18	31

H7_4: Have never participated in RPT process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	67.9	80.6	94.4	96.8
Yes (%)	32.1	19.4	5.6	3.2
Total (N)	28	31	18	31

H8: Understand dept RPT standards	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	3.4	3.6
4: Very well (%)	21.4	33.3	44.4	64.5
3: Fairly well (%)	46.4	40.0	50.0	32.3
2: Not very well (%)	28.6	20.0	5.6	.
1: Not at all (%)	3.6	6.7	.	3.2
Total (N)	28	30	18	31

H9: Understand dept RPT procedures	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	3.4	3.7
4: Very well (%)	25.0	37.9	44.4	71.0
3: Fairly well (%)	46.4	44.8	55.6	29.0
2: Not very well (%)	25.0	10.3	.	.
1: Not at all (%)	3.6	6.9	.	.
Total (N)	28	29	18	31

H10: Departmental RPT standards applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.9	3.2	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	23.5	19.2	31.3	29.0
3: Agree (%)	64.7	53.8	56.3	64.5
2: Disagree (%)	5.9	23.1	12.5	6.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.9	3.8	.	.
Total (N)	17	26	16	31

H11: Departmental RPT procedures applied consistently/fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.2	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	16.0	38.9	38.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	68.0	50.0	51.6
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	16.0	5.6	9.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	5.6	.
Total (N)	18	25	18	31

H12a: Sufficient resources for teaching/mentoring students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	2.7	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	8.3	11.1	6.9
3: Agree (%)	62.5	45.8	50.0	58.6
2: Disagree (%)	8.3	41.7	38.9	20.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.2	4.2	.	13.8
Total (N)	24	24	18	29

H12b: Sufficient resources for discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.3	2.6	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	20.0	.	5.9	.
3: Agree (%)	75.0	45.0	52.9	54.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	35.0	35.3	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.0	20.0	5.9	12.5
Total (N)	20	20	17	24

H12c: Sufficient resources for creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	2.3	2.3	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	50.0	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	50.0	50.0	33.3	100.0
2: Disagree (%)	.	25.0	66.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	25.0	.	.
Total (N)	4	4	3	4

H12d: Sufficient resources for tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.6	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	30.0	.	.	7.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	47.1	70.0	69.2
2: Disagree (%)	10.0	41.2	20.0	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.0	11.8	10.0	7.7
Total (N)	10	17	10	13

H12e: Sufficient resources for extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4	2.3	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	58.3	60.0	50.0	81.8
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	30.0	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.3	20.0	20.0	9.1
Total (N)	12	10	10	11

H12f: Sufficient resources for professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.7	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	26.7	.	13.3	8.3
3: Agree (%)	40.0	47.1	46.7	62.5
2: Disagree (%)	26.7	47.1	40.0	16.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	5.9	.	12.5
Total (N)	15	17	15	24

H13a: Department rewards teaching/mentoring of students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.7	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.4	18.5	16.7	6.9
3: Agree (%)	52.2	48.1	38.9	69.0
2: Disagree (%)	21.7	29.6	38.9	17.2
1: Strongly disagree (%)	8.7	3.7	5.6	6.9
Total (N)	23	27	18	29

H13b: Department rewards discovery of knowledge	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.1	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	39.1	23.8	40.0	27.3
3: Agree (%)	56.5	61.9	26.7	63.6
2: Disagree (%)	.	14.3	33.3	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	4.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	23	21	15	22

H13c: Department rewards creative artistry and literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	3.0	2.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	20.0	.	.
3: Agree (%)	33.3	40.0	100.0	.
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	.	100.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	33.3	40.0	.	.
Total (N)	6	5	3	2

H13d: Department rewards tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.5	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	14.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	57.1	28.6	87.5	90.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	50.0	12.5	9.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	7.1	.	.
Total (N)	14	14	8	11

H13e: Department rewards extension/engagement	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.6	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	31.3	11.8	18.2	7.1
3: Agree (%)	43.8	47.1	36.4	85.7
2: Disagree (%)	12.5	29.4	36.4	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	12.5	11.8	9.1	7.1
Total (N)	16	17	11	14

H13f: Department rewards professional service	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.9	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	27.8	8.3	13.3	7.7
3: Agree (%)	50.0	54.2	60.0	73.1
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	37.5	26.7	15.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	5.6	.	.	3.8
Total (N)	18	24	15	26

Back to Top

Section I: Post-Tenure Review

I1_1: No experience with PTR	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Has experience (%)	3.7	76.9	100.0	100.0
No experience (%)	96.3	23.1	.	.
Total (N)	27	26	16	29

I1_2: Have had PTR Comprehensive Review	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	42.3	18.8	6.9
Yes (%)	.	57.7	81.3	93.1
Total (N)	27	26	16	29

I1_3: Have served on PTR committee	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	96.3	69.2	50.0	51.7
Yes (%)	3.7	30.8	50.0	48.3
Total (N)	27	26	16	29

I1_4: Have been dept/college administrator in PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	96.3	96.2	81.3	89.7
Yes (%)	3.7	3.8	18.8	10.3
Total (N)	27	26	16	29

I1_5: Had other PTR experience	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	92.3	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	.	7.7	.	.
Total (N)	27	26	16	29

I2a: Easy to find PTR information on NCSU website	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.8	2.9	2.9
4: Strongly agree (%)	28.6	10.5	7.1	7.7
3: Agree (%)	71.4	63.2	78.6	76.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	26.3	7.1	11.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	3.8
Total (N)	7	19	14	26

I2b: PTR process known/understood in department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.3	2.9	3.0	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	9.5	20.0	13.8
3: Agree (%)	14.3	66.7	60.0	75.9
2: Disagree (%)	57.1	23.8	20.0	10.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	7	21	15	29

I2c: Departmental PTR procedures are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	3.0	3.1	3.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	14.3	20.0	13.8
3: Agree (%)	42.9	71.4	66.7	82.8
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	14.3	13.3	3.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.	.	.
Total (N)	7	21	15	29

I2d: Departmental PTR standards are clear	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.9	2.8	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	10.0	20.0	10.3
3: Agree (%)	28.6	65.0	46.7	79.3
2: Disagree (%)	42.9	25.0	26.7	6.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	.	6.7	3.4
Total (N)	7	20	15	29

I2e: Departmental PTR procedures are followed equitably	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.1	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	22.2	21.4	20.0
3: Agree (%)	75.0	77.8	71.4	80.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.1	.
Total (N)	4	18	14	25

I2f: Departmental PTR standards are applied fairly	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.2	3.0	3.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	22.2	23.1	20.8
3: Agree (%)	66.7	77.8	61.5	79.2
2: Disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	7.7	.
Total (N)	3	18	13	24

I2g: Dept PTR committee members are well prepared and trained	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	2.9	3.0	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	33.3	13.3	15.4	14.3
3: Agree (%)	66.7	66.7	69.2	61.9
2: Disagree (%)	.	20.0	15.4	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	.	.	9.5
Total (N)	3	15	13	21

I3: Overall satisfaction with PTR process	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	1.5	2.7	2.6	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	.	5.3	6.3	13.8
3: Satisfied (%)	.	68.4	56.3	62.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	50.0	21.1	25.0	6.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	50.0	5.3	12.5	17.2
Total (N)	2	19	16	29

Back to Top

Section J: Pay and Compensation

J1a: My salary is competitive within my department	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.4	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.3	10.3	6.3	14.3
3: Agree (%)	89.5	37.9	56.3	42.9
2: Disagree (%)	5.3	34.5	25.0	33.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	17.2	12.5	9.5
Total (N)	19	29	16	21

J1b: My salary is competitive within my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.2	2.0	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	4.5	.	7.1
3: Agree (%)	100.0	36.4	30.0	35.7
2: Disagree (%)	.	36.4	40.0	42.9
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	22.7	30.0	14.3
Total (N)	11	22	10	14

J1c: My salary is competitive within NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.2	1.9	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	4.2	.	7.7
3: Agree (%)	90.9	29.2	30.0	38.5
2: Disagree (%)	9.1	45.8	30.0	38.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	20.8	40.0	15.4
Total (N)	11	24	10	13

J1d: My salary is competitive within UNC system	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	1.9	1.7	2.1
4: Strongly agree (%)	.	4.5	.	.
3: Agree (%)	83.3	18.2	10.0	33.3
2: Disagree (%)	16.7	36.4	50.0	41.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	40.9	40.0	25.0
Total (N)	12	22	10	12

J1e: My salary is competitive within discipline at comparable institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	1.8	1.8	1.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	5.6	3.8	.	5.0
3: Agree (%)	44.4	19.2	23.1	10.0
2: Disagree (%)	38.9	34.6	30.8	45.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	11.1	42.3	46.2	40.0
Total (N)	18	26	13	20

J2: Understand how faculty salaries determined	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.0	2.6	2.8	2.9
4: Very well (%)	3.6	16.1	22.2	27.6
3: Fairly well (%)	28.6	48.4	50.0	51.7
2: Not very well (%)	28.6	16.1	11.1	6.9
1: Not at all (%)	39.3	19.4	16.7	13.8
Total (N)	28	31	18	29

J3: My department links salary increase to meritorious performance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.9	2.9	3.0
4: Strongly agree (%)	14.3	21.4	25.0	25.9
3: Agree (%)	71.4	53.6	50.0	59.3
2: Disagree (%)	14.3	17.9	18.8	7.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	7.1	6.3	7.4
Total (N)	21	28	16	27

J4: I have access to benefits information	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.3	3.1	3.3
4: Strongly agree (%)	21.4	36.7	29.4	34.5
3: Agree (%)	71.4	56.7	52.9	65.5
2: Disagree (%)	7.1	3.3	17.6	.
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	3.3	.	.
Total (N)	28	30	17	29

J5: Healthcare benefits are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.0	1.6	2.2
4: Strongly agree (%)	12.0	8.3	.	.
3: Agree (%)	28.0	16.7	13.3	39.1
2: Disagree (%)	24.0	37.5	33.3	39.1
1: Strongly disagree (%)	36.0	37.5	53.3	21.7
Total (N)	25	24	15	23

J6: Retirement programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.5	2.4	1.9	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	9.5	8.3	.	11.1
3: Agree (%)	47.6	50.0	30.8	44.4
2: Disagree (%)	28.6	16.7	30.8	44.4
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	25.0	38.5	.
Total (N)	21	24	13	18

J7: Voluntary benefits programs are competitive with other institutions	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.4	2.2	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	6.7	.	.	7.1
3: Agree (%)	66.7	64.7	50.0	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	20.0	11.8	20.0	14.3
1: Strongly disagree (%)	6.7	23.5	30.0	7.1
Total (N)	15	17	10	14

J8: I am satisfied with my compensation at NC State	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.3	2.2	2.4
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	.	.	.
3: Agree (%)	63.0	40.0	33.3	55.2
2: Disagree (%)	18.5	50.0	50.0	34.5
1: Strongly disagree (%)	.	10.0	16.7	10.3
Total (N)	27	30	18	29

J9: Departmental environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.8	2.8	2.8
4: Strongly agree (%)	17.9	14.8	12.5	17.2
3: Agree (%)	50.0	63.0	56.3	58.6
2: Disagree (%)	21.4	11.1	25.0	13.8
1: Strongly disagree (%)	10.7	11.1	6.3	10.3
Total (N)	28	27	16	29

J10: NCSU environment enables work/personal life balance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.6	2.6
4: Strongly agree (%)	11.1	3.8	5.6	3.6
3: Agree (%)	66.7	73.1	55.6	71.4
2: Disagree (%)	14.8	11.5	27.8	10.7
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	11.5	11.1	14.3
Total (N)	27	26	18	28

J11a: Importance of flexible work hours	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.5	3.6	3.5
4: Very important (%)	89.3	71.4	66.7	69.0
3: Somewhat important (%)	10.7	17.9	22.2	20.7
2: Not very important (%)	.	3.6	11.1	3.4
1: Not at all important (%)	.	7.1	.	6.9
Total (N)	28	28	18	29

J11b: Importance of maternity/paternity leave	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.7	3.8	3.3
4: Very important (%)	92.9	71.4	76.5	55.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	7.1	25.0	23.5	27.6
2: Not very important (%)	.	3.6	.	6.9
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	10.3
Total (N)	28	28	17	29

J11c: Importance of family leave time	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.6	3.8	3.4
4: Very important (%)	82.1	60.7	81.3	58.6
3: Somewhat important (%)	17.9	39.3	18.8	24.1
2: Not very important (%)	.	.	.	13.8
1: Not at all important (%)	.	.	.	3.4
Total (N)	28	28	16	29

J11d: Importance of altering tenure clock for family concerns	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.9	3.4	3.6	3.4
4: Very important (%)	92.9	53.6	76.5	62.1
3: Somewhat important (%)	7.1	35.7	11.8	24.1
2: Not very important (%)	.	7.1	11.8	10.3
1: Not at all important (%)	.	3.6	.	3.4
Total (N)	28	28	17	29

J11e: Importance of childcare facility on or near campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.8	3.2	3.1	3.2
4: Very important (%)	78.6	46.4	29.4	44.8
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.4	35.7	47.1	37.9
2: Not very important (%)	.	10.7	23.5	6.9
1: Not at all important (%)	.	7.1	.	10.3
Total (N)	28	28	17	29

J11f: Importance of tuition remission for dependents	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.3	3.4	3.4	3.3
4: Very important (%)	57.1	62.1	64.7	55.2
3: Somewhat important (%)	21.4	24.1	11.8	31.0
2: Not very important (%)	17.9	6.9	23.5	6.9
1: Not at all important (%)	3.6	6.9	.	6.9
Total (N)	28	29	17	29

Back to Top

Section K: Campus Infrastructure/Physical Environment

K1: I have sufficient clerical/admin support in my dept	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	6.5	11.1	24.1
3: Agree (%)	42.9	48.4	44.4	34.5
2: Disagree (%)	17.9	32.3	38.9	31.0
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	12.9	5.6	10.3
Total (N)	28	31	18	29

K2: I have sufficient tech assistance	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.5	2.6	2.7
4: Strongly agree (%)	25.0	6.5	11.1	20.7
3: Agree (%)	35.7	48.4	44.4	37.9
2: Disagree (%)	25.0	35.5	38.9	27.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	14.3	9.7	5.6	13.8
Total (N)	28	31	18	29

K3: There is sufficient support staff in my college	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.6	2.7	2.5
4: Strongly agree (%)	18.5	6.9	11.1	13.8
3: Agree (%)	51.9	58.6	50.0	41.4
2: Disagree (%)	22.2	17.2	33.3	27.6
1: Strongly disagree (%)	7.4	17.2	5.6	17.2
Total (N)	27	29	18	29

K4a: Satisfaction with office space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.4	3.0	3.2	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	50.0	29.0	33.3	27.6
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	48.4	50.0	55.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	12.9	16.7	13.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	9.7	.	3.4
Total (N)	28	31	18	29

K4b: Satisfaction with lab space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.6	3.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	33.3	13.3	42.9	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	40.0	53.3	28.6	55.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.7	13.3	14.3	33.3
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	20.0	14.3	.
Total (N)	15	15	7	9

K4c: Satisfaction with classrooms in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.3	2.5	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	3.3	5.9	6.9
3: Satisfied (%)	42.9	46.7	47.1	55.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	39.3	30.0	35.3	24.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	20.0	11.8	13.8
Total (N)	28	30	17	29

K4d: Satisfaction with labs in which you teach	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.2	2.4	2.5	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	53.8	.	.	12.5
3: Satisfied (%)	15.4	57.1	50.0	50.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	28.6	50.0	37.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	14.3	.	.
Total (N)	13	14	6	8

K4e: Satisfaction with maintenance of building in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.2	2.5	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	18.5	9.7	5.9	10.3
3: Satisfied (%)	48.1	32.3	47.1	41.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.9	29.0	35.3	27.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.4	29.0	11.8	20.7
Total (N)	27	31	17	29

K4f: Satisfaction with infrastructure of bldgs in which you work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.2	2.2	2.4
4: Very Satisfied (%)	17.9	6.5	.	6.9
3: Satisfied (%)	39.3	32.3	47.1	37.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	35.7	35.5	29.4	41.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.1	25.8	23.5	13.8
Total (N)	28	31	17	29

K4g: Satisfaction with availability of up-to-date equipment	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	11.1	.	10.7
3: Satisfied (%)	50.0	44.4	47.1	53.6
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	22.2	41.2	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.7	22.2	11.8	14.3
Total (N)	28	27	17	28

K4h: Satisfaction with availability of office supplies	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	28.6	13.3	5.9	24.1
3: Satisfied (%)	60.7	63.3	82.4	55.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	16.7	11.8	13.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	6.7	.	6.9
Total (N)	28	30	17	29

K4i: Satisfaction with availability of informal meeting space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.6	2.6	2.4	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	25.0	10.3	5.9	10.3
3: Satisfied (%)	28.6	51.7	35.3	44.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	32.1	20.7	47.1	34.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	14.3	17.2	11.8	10.3
Total (N)	28	29	17	29

K4j: Satisfaction with dining options on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	2.3	2.2	2.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	.	7.7	4.5
3: Satisfied (%)	27.3	45.8	23.1	31.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	33.3	46.2	54.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	27.3	20.8	23.1	9.1
Total (N)	22	24	13	22

K4k: Satisfaction with availability of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	1.9	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	3.4	.	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	67.9	51.7	25.0	51.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	7.1	27.6	43.8	37.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	10.7	17.2	31.3	6.9
Total (N)	28	29	16	29

K4l: Satisfaction with cost of parking	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.1	1.7	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	3.4	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	51.9	37.9	25.0	41.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	29.6	24.1	18.8	37.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	7.4	34.5	56.3	20.7
Total (N)	27	29	16	29

K4m: Satisfaction with Wolfline	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	3.1	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	9.1	20.0	16.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	54.5	70.0	33.3	81.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	36.4	10.0	50.0	18.2
Total (N)	11	10	6	11

K4n: Satisfaction with commute between Centennial and main	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.1	2.1	2.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.0	5.3	11.1	.
3: Satisfied (%)	35.0	26.3	22.2	35.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	36.8	33.3	52.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	25.0	31.6	33.3	11.8
Total (N)	20	19	9	17

K4o: Satisfaction with campus safety	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.7	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	13.0	4.0	5.9	.
3: Satisfied (%)	78.3	68.0	76.5	84.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.7	24.0	11.8	8.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	4.0	5.9	8.0
Total (N)	23	25	17	25

K4p: Satisfaction with campus aesthetics	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.5	2.1	2.6
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.5	.	.	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	57.7	53.6	31.3	55.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.9	39.3	43.8	37.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.8	7.1	25.0	3.4
Total (N)	26	28	16	29

K4q: Satisfaction with upkeep of campus grounds	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.8	2.7	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	6.9	.	3.4
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	69.0	75.0	79.3
2: Dissatisfied (%)	12.5	20.7	18.8	13.8
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	3.4	6.3	3.4
Total (N)	24	29	16	29

K4r: Satisfaction with amount of green space	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.6	2.3	2.5
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	3.6	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	60.7	60.7	50.0	55.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	28.6	28.6	31.3	37.9
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	3.6	7.1	18.8	6.9
Total (N)	28	28	16	29

K5a: Satisfaction with energy conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.4	2.7	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	14.3	.	6.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	61.9	56.5	53.3	72.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	23.8	26.1	40.0	22.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	17.4	.	4.5
Total (N)	21	23	15	22

K5b: Satisfaction with water conservation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	2.6	2.8	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.8	.	7.7	.
3: Satisfied (%)	68.4	68.4	69.2	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	15.8	26.3	23.1	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	5.3	.	.
Total (N)	19	19	13	18

K5c: Satisfaction with recycling efforts	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	2.8	3.1	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.8	15.4	17.6	15.4
3: Satisfied (%)	70.8	61.5	76.5	80.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	8.3	15.4	5.9	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	7.7	.	3.8
Total (N)	24	26	17	26

K5d: Satisfaction with alternative transportation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.2	2.9
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.3	10.0	.	5.3
3: Satisfied (%)	63.2	60.0	28.6	84.2
2: Dissatisfied (%)	26.3	25.0	64.3	10.5
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	5.3	5.0	7.1	.
Total (N)	19	20	14	19

K5e: Satisfaction with green building practices	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.7	2.0	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	15.4	.	.	.
3: Satisfied (%)	53.8	73.3	33.3	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	30.8	26.7	33.3	22.2
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	33.3	.
Total (N)	13	15	9	9

K5f: Satisfaction with use of recycled-content resources	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.6	3.1
4: Very Satisfied (%)	16.7	7.1	.	9.1
3: Satisfied (%)	58.3	71.4	72.7	90.9
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	21.4	18.2	.
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	12	14	11	11

K6: Interest in hotel/conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.6	2.3	2.6
4: A lot (%)	39.3	21.4	22.2	24.1
3: Some (%)	28.6	39.3	27.8	34.5
2: A little (%)	17.9	17.9	11.1	20.7
1: None at all (%)	14.3	21.4	38.9	20.7
Total (N)	28	28	18	29

K7: Likelihood of using conference center on Centennial Campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.9	2.7	2.6
4: Very likely (%)	35.7	28.6	22.2	20.7
3: Somewhat likely (%)	28.6	42.9	44.4	27.6
2: Not very likely (%)	21.4	17.9	16.7	41.4
1: Not at all likely (%)	14.3	10.7	16.7	10.3
Total (N)	28	28	18	29

Back to Top

Section L: Recreation/Wellness

L1: Satisfaction with recreation activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.8	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	11.1	17.2	5.6	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	70.4	65.5	77.8	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	18.5	17.2	11.1	3.6
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	5.6	.
Total (N)	27	29	18	28

L2: Satisfaction with cultural activities on campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.7	2.8	2.6	2.8
4: Very Satisfied (%)	3.8	6.9	5.9	3.6
3: Satisfied (%)	61.5	72.4	58.8	71.4
2: Dissatisfied (%)	34.6	13.8	29.4	21.4
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	6.9	5.9	3.6
Total (N)	26	29	17	28

L3a: Satisfaction with Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	3.1	2.8	3.3
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.0	25.0	8.3	43.5
3: Satisfied (%)	70.0	62.5	75.0	47.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	25.0	12.5	8.3	8.7
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	8.3	.
Total (N)	20	16	12	23

L3b: Satisfaction with recreation space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.0	2.7	3.2
4: Very Satisfied (%)	5.6	17.6	9.1	25.0
3: Satisfied (%)	77.8	64.7	63.6	65.0
2: Dissatisfied (%)	16.7	17.6	18.2	10.0
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	9.1	.
Total (N)	18	17	11	20

L3c: Satisfaction with organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.1	3.1	2.9	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.7	14.3	14.3	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	92.3	85.7	57.1	77.8
2: Dissatisfied (%)	.	.	28.6	11.1
Total (N)	13	7	7	9

L3d: Satisfaction with ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	3.1	2.7	3.0
4: Very Satisfied (%)	7.1	12.5	13.3	7.1
3: Satisfied (%)	78.6	81.3	46.7	85.7
2: Dissatisfied (%)	14.3	6.3	33.3	7.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	.	.	6.7	.
Total (N)	14	16	15	14

L3e: Satisfaction with Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.0	3.0	3.2	2.7
4: Very Satisfied (%)	20.0	18.2	20.0	11.1
3: Satisfied (%)	66.7	72.7	80.0	61.1
2: Dissatisfied (%)	6.7	.	.	11.1
1: Very dissatisfied (%)	6.7	9.1	.	16.7
Total (N)	15	11	10	18

L4a: How often use Carmichael Gymnasium	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	3.5	2.9	3.1	4.0
Once a week or more (%)	39.3	20.0	18.8	42.9
A few times a month (%)	7.1	10.0	18.8	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	3.6	10.0	12.5	10.7
Once a semester (%)	7.1	3.3	.	7.1
Once a year (%)	.	10.0	6.3	7.1
Never (%)	42.9	46.7	43.8	25.0
Total (N)	28	30	16	28

L4b: How often use recreational space around campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.8	2.0	2.6	3.4
Once a week or more (%)	10.7	6.7	12.5	14.3
A few times a month (%)	21.4	.	12.5	14.3
A few times a semester (%)	10.7	13.3	6.3	25.0
Once a semester (%)	3.6	6.7	6.3	14.3
Once a year (%)	3.6	13.3	18.8	7.1
Never (%)	50.0	60.0	43.8	25.0
Total (N)	28	30	16	28

L4c: How often participate in organized Campus Recreation Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.4	1.6	1.3
Once a week or more (%)	7.7	.	6.3	.
A few times a month (%)	.	3.6	6.3	.
A few times a semester (%)	19.2	3.6	.	3.6
Once a semester (%)	7.7	3.6	.	7.1
Once a year (%)	3.8	3.6	6.3	.
Never (%)	61.5	85.7	81.3	89.3
Total (N)	26	28	16	28

L4d: How often attend ARTS NC State programs	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.4	2.3	3.3	2.3
Once a week or more (%)	3.6	3.3	6.3	.
A few times a month (%)	.	3.3	18.8	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	17.9	10.0	25.0	21.4
Once a semester (%)	28.6	26.7	12.5	10.7
Once a year (%)	7.1	13.3	25.0	17.9
Never (%)	42.9	43.3	12.5	42.9
Total (N)	28	30	16	28

L4e: How often attend Wolfpack athletic events	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.7	2.1	2.3
Once a week or more (%)	7.1	.	.	.
A few times a month (%)	.	.	6.7	7.1
A few times a semester (%)	17.9	10.0	13.3	21.4
Once a semester (%)	10.7	16.7	6.7	7.1
Once a year (%)	10.7	10.0	26.7	21.4
Never (%)	53.6	63.3	46.7	42.9
Total (N)	28	30	15	28

L5: Interest in designated faculty-only dining facility	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.9	2.5	2.7	2.4
4: A great deal (%)	40.7	30.0	35.3	28.6
3: Some (%)	25.9	20.0	29.4	21.4
2: A little (%)	11.1	16.7	5.9	14.3
1: None at all (%)	22.2	33.3	29.4	35.7
Total (N)	27	30	17	28

L6: Likelihood of using gym on Centennial campus	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean Rating	2.2	1.7	1.6	1.5
4: Very likely (%)	21.4	10.0	5.9	10.7
3: Somewhat likely (%)	17.9	6.7	17.6	.
2: Not very likely (%)	21.4	23.3	5.9	14.3
1: Not at all likely (%)	39.3	60.0	70.6	75.0
Total (N)	28	30	17	28

Back to Top

Section M: Work Activities

M1: Total hours per week spent performing job-related work (collapsed)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean # Hrs Work	61.0	60.8	57.8	52.9
more than 60 hrs (%)	32.1	33.3	27.8	7.1
51 to 60 hrs (%)	50.0	40.0	33.3	39.3
41 to 50 hrs (%)	14.3	20.0	33.3	46.4
40 hrs or less (%)	3.6	6.7	5.6	7.1
Total (N)	28	30	18	28

M2A: Proportion of total hours spent on teaching/mentoring	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	41.0	36.9	37.2	37.0
more than 50% of time (%)	25.0	19.4	5.6	21.4
26% to 50% of time (%)	46.4	54.8	77.8	50.0
11% to 25% of time (%)	28.6	12.9	16.7	17.9
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	6.5	.	3.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	.	.	.	3.6
0% of time (%)	.	6.5	.	3.6
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M2a_1r: Includes teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	17.9	20.7	11.1	11.1
Yes (%)	82.1	79.3	88.9	88.9
Total (N)	28	29	18	27

M2a_2r: Includes professional development to improve teaching (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	50.0	79.3	72.2	59.3
Yes (%)	50.0	20.7	27.8	40.7
Total (N)	28	29	18	27

M2a_3r: Includes research projects with students (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	39.3	31.0	22.2	37.0
Yes (%)	60.7	69.0	77.8	63.0
Total (N)	28	29	18	27

M2a_4r: Includes supervising internships/field experiences (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	85.7	93.1	88.9	81.5
Yes (%)	14.3	6.9	11.1	18.5
Total (N)	28	29	18	27

M2a_5r: Includes student thesis/dissertation committee work (among those reporting time spent on teaching/mentoring)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	39.3	44.8	33.3	33.3
Yes (%)	60.7	55.2	66.7	66.7
Total (N)	28	29	18	27

M2B: Proportion of total hours spent advising students	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	7.3	5.7	6.6	9.2
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	.	.	10.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	14.3	9.7	11.1	7.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	32.1	16.1	22.2	17.9
1% to 5% of time (%)	35.7	45.2	55.6	53.6
0% of time (%)	17.9	29.0	11.1	10.7
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M2b_1r: Includes formal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	34.8	27.3	25.0	16.0
Yes (%)	65.2	72.7	75.0	84.0
Total (N)	23	22	16	25

M2b_2r: Includes informal advising (among those reporting time spent on advising)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	47.8	54.5	37.5	52.0
Yes (%)	52.2	45.5	62.5	48.0
Total (N)	23	22	16	25

M2C: Proportion of total hours spent on research/scholarly Activities	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	39.2	32.8	31.4	26.7
more than 50% of time (%)	17.9	3.2	11.1	10.7
26% to 50% of time (%)	53.6	67.7	44.4	35.7
11% to 25% of time (%)	17.9	9.7	27.8	25.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	3.6	.	16.7	3.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	3.6	3.2	.	7.1
0% of time (%)	3.6	16.1	.	17.9
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M2D: Proportion of total hours spent on creative artistry/literature	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.2	0.0	0.0	0.5
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	.	.	3.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	3.6	.	.	3.6
0% of time (%)	96.4	100.0	100.0	92.9
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M2E: Proportion of total hours spent on extension/engagement/econ dev	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	1.3	1.7	0.9	3.2
more than 50% of time (%)	.	.	.	3.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	3.2	.	.
11% to 25% of time (%)	3.6	.	.	.
1% to 5% of time (%)	14.3	16.1	22.2	14.3
0% of time (%)	82.1	80.6	77.8	82.1
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M2e_1r: Includes service learning teaching/mentoring (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	80.0	83.3	25.0	100.0
Yes (%)	20.0	16.7	75.0	.
Total (N)	5	6	4	5

M2e_2r: Includes extension education/non-credit programs (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	40.0	100.0	75.0	40.0
Yes (%)	60.0	.	25.0	60.0
Total (N)	5	6	4	5

M2e_3r: Includes economic development training/tech assistance (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	80.0	83.3	100.0	100.0
Yes (%)	20.0	16.7	.	.
Total (N)	5	6	4	5

M2e_4r: Includes partnering with private sector - job/investment creation (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	60.0	83.3	75.0	60.0
Yes (%)	40.0	16.7	25.0	40.0
Total (N)	5	6	4	5

M2e_5r: Public service grants/contracts (among those reporting time spent on extension/engagement)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	80.0	66.7	100.0	80.0
Yes (%)	20.0	33.3	.	20.0
Total (N)	5	6	4	5

M2F: Proportion of total hours spent on service work	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	8.1	10.4	13.6	10.9
26% to 50% of time (%)	.	3.2	11.1	7.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	21.4	29.0	27.8	25.0
6% to 10% of time (%)	14.3	29.0	44.4	28.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	50.0	22.6	11.1	21.4
0% of time (%)	14.3	16.1	5.6	17.9
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M2f_1r: Includes advising student groups (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	87.5	84.6	70.6	95.7
Yes (%)	12.5	15.4	29.4	4.3
Total (N)	24	26	17	23

M2f_2r: Includes dept/college/university committees (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	25.0	23.1	17.6	13.0
Yes (%)	75.0	76.9	82.4	87.0
Total (N)	24	26	17	23

M2f_3r: Includes professional service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	41.7	38.5	29.4	43.5
Yes (%)	58.3	61.5	70.6	56.5
Total (N)	24	26	17	23

M2f_4r: Includes academic program assessment activities (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	87.5	88.5	76.5	65.2
Yes (%)	12.5	11.5	23.5	34.8
Total (N)	24	26	17	23

M2f_5r: Includes other university service (among those reporting time spent on service work)	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	87.5	61.5	58.8	60.9
Yes (%)	12.5	38.5	41.2	39.1
Total (N)	24	26	17	23

M2G: Proportion of total hours spent on tech/managerial innovation	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	0.7	0.8	0.0	0.4
6% to 10% of time (%)	.	6.5	.	3.6
1% to 5% of time (%)	14.3	9.7	.	.
0% of time (%)	85.7	83.9	100.0	96.4
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M2H: Proportion of total hours spent on dept/college admin duties	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
Mean % of Time on Activity	2.3	5.5	10.8	8.8
more than 50% of time (%)	.	3.2	5.6	3.6
26% to 50% of time (%)	3.6	3.2	5.6	7.1
11% to 25% of time (%)	.	3.2	22.2	7.1
6% to 10% of time (%)	10.7	12.9	.	10.7
1% to 5% of time (%)	3.6	16.1	11.1	21.4
0% of time (%)	82.1	61.3	55.6	50.0
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M3_1: Worked summer at NCSU without overload pay	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	53.6	41.9	44.4	32.1
Yes (%)	46.4	58.1	55.6	67.9
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M3_2: Taught at NCSU on overload basis	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	100.0	83.9	72.2	75.0
Yes (%)	.	16.1	27.8	25.0
Total (N)	28	31	18	28

M3_3: Taught NCSU distance education class	6 or fewer	7-15	16-25	26 or more
No (%)	92.9	90.3	83.3	78.6
Yes (%)	7.1	9.7	16.7	21.4
Total (N)	28	31	18	28